DOCSLIB.ORG

Resurrecting Samuel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Resurrecting Samuel CHAPTER 7 Resurrecting Samuel With its army approaching Constantinople, the victorious Russia in the war against Ottomans stood in a position to dictate the armistice’s conditions. The peace agreement signed at the suburbs of Constantinople in San Stefano (today Yeshilkoy) on March 3rd 1878 stipulated the creation of a Great Bulgarian state with territory stretching from the Black Sea to Aegean, encompassing Bulgaria, part of Thrace and almost all Macedonia (Thessalonica excluded). This was not what the Great Powers had expected since the agreement’s formalization opened the prospects for Russia’s significant influence in the Balkans with Bulgaria as its satellite. Germany’s interference, together with Britain, Austria- Hungary, France, and Italy, resulted in the San Stefano treaty’s revision at the Congress of Berlin (June 14–July 14, 1878). With the Berlin Treaty, Bulgaria became an autonomous principality with significantly reduced territory. The treaty stripped Bulgaria from its southern territory that became a semiautono- mous province called Eastern Rumelia, while Macedonia remained under the Sultan’s direct control. Austria-Hungary occupied Bosnia and Herzegovina, while Serbia, Montenegro and Romania received independence. Together with Russia and Bulgaria’s frustrations, this political revision of the Balkans only further stirred the competition over Macedonia and Thrace, the provinces that remained under the Ottoman rule. In Freeman’s commentary to his study on the Southern Slavs in 1879, he stated that he was right to warn that Samuel and Basil II’s spirits would be called upon, however not for Orthodox reconciliation, but to fuel the Balkan confrontation over Macedonia. According to him, this warning remained a topical subject after “the arms of Russia gave practical freedom to the whole Bulgarian nation” and the diplomacy “of those who claim to represent England has ruled that that freedom should be taken away again from the greater part of the Bulgarian nation.” Criticizing the political constellation the Treaty of Berlin had created, Freeman again cautioned that “this unnatural division of the Bulgarian nation is in its own nature temporary” and that “the only result of the interference of those who profess to speak for England is the creation of an immediate wrong, with a likelihood of future bloodshed.”1 Writing from a different perspective, Margaritis Dimitsas came to a similar conclusion in his Epitome of History (1879). He declared that the natural beauty 1 Freeman, “The Southern Slaves,” 426–427. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2019 | doi:10.1163/9789004394292_009 256 CHAPTER 7 of Macedonia “must have incurred the envy of some malignant demon, who breathed a spirit of discord into many of the Bulgarian-speaking inhabitants of north-west Macedonia, so that they made of it an arena of foreign trickery and machinations”. Dimitsas advocated that Greece would emerge as a win- ner in this arena only through knowledge of history.2 The need to historically legitimize the territorial conquests sanctioned by the San Stefano Treaty and revised at the Berlin Congress, incited the Bulgarian nationalists’ appeal to the now-absolved Samuel to resurrect his great medieval state in Macedonia. An appropriate reaction by the Greek, Serbian and Macedonian nationalists was inevitable. As Dimitsas expected, however, the historiographers, crossing pens instead of swords in fierce debates for historical legitimization of the politi- cal projects, first faced the “demons.” The foundation for creating Samuel and Basil’s legends was finally prepared. This followed the previously established directions for the inevitable Balkan confrontation over Macedonia, which had an immediate impact on the historiographical discourse. The process of incor- porating Samuel and Basil II in the Balkan national histories began. Drinov and Jireček’s high positions in the Principality of Bulgaria, indicate that they were entrusted with the political agenda of constructing Bulgarian national history. From 1878 to 1879, Drinov served as Deputy Governor of Sofia and Minister of Popular Enlightenment and Spiritual Affairs. Jireček worked as Secretary and from 1881–1882, as Minister in the Ministry of Popular Enlightenment and Spiritual Affairs. Notably, the Bulgarian Principality in fact imported Drinov and Jireček’s historiographical constructs, which were then institutionalized through their political engagement. Acting on Drinov’s suggestion and Jireček’s support, Prince Alexander Dondukov-Korsakov (1820–1893), the Russian Imperial Commissioner super- vising Bulgaria’s transition to self-government, picked Sofia to be the Bulgarian Principality’s capital city. According to Drinov’s idea, Sofia symbolized the center of the Bulgarian lands that would include the future incorporation of Macedonia and Thrace that were lost with the Treaty of Berlin in 1878.3 In this political concept of the imaginary national territory, the direct association of Samuel’s Empire with Macedonia created the key motive for embracing Samuel in the newly constructed Bulgarian national history. Through Drinov’s initia- tive, Samuel became an integral part of the history curriculum in elementary 2 Margaritis G. Dimitsas, Epitomos istoria tis Makedonias (Athens: Palamidis, 1879), 43, cited by Gounaris, “Greek views of Macedonia,” 148–149. 3 Petăr Dinekov, “Kak Sofia be izbrana za stolitsa na Bălgaria,” Serdika 3/4 (1939), 3–4. The sup- port came from Jireček as well, which was not surprising, since he was one of the first to argue that Sofia was the seat of the Emperor Shishman. See, Jireček, Istoriia Bolgar, 246..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vladimir Paounovsky
    THE B ULGARIAN POLICY TTHE BB ULGARIAN PP OLICY ON THE BB ALKAN CCOUNTRIESAND NN ATIONAL MM INORITIES,, 1878-19121878-1912 Vladimir Paounovsky 1.IN THE NAME OF THE NATIONAL IDEAL The period in the history of the Balkan nations known as the “Eastern Crisis of 1875-1879” determined the international political development in the region during the period between the end of 19th century and the end of World War I (1918). That period was both a time of the consolidation of and opposition to Balkan nationalism with the aim of realizing, to a greater or lesser degree, separate national doctrines and ideals. Forced to maneuver in the labyrinth of contradictory interests of the Great Powers on the Balkan Peninsula, the battles among the Balkan countries for superiority of one over the others, led them either to Pyrrhic victories or defeats. This was particularly evident during the 1912-1913 Balkan Wars (The Balkan War and The Interallied War) and World War I, which was ignited by a spark from the Balkans. The San Stefano Peace Treaty of 3 March, 1878 put an end to the Russo-Turkish War (1877-1878). According to the treaty, an independent Bulgarian state was to be founded within the ethnographic borders defined during the Istanbul Conference of December 1876; that is, within the framework of the Bulgarian Exarchate. According to the treaty the only loss for Bulgaria was the ceding of North Dobroujda to Romania as compensa- tion for the return of Bessarabia to Russia. The Congress of Berlin (June 1878), however, re-consid- ered the Peace Treaty and replaced it with a new one in which San Stefano Bulgaria was parceled out; its greater part was put under Ottoman control again while Serbia was given the regions around Pirot and Vranya as a compensation for the occupation of Novi Pazar sancak (administrative district) by Austro-Hun- - 331 - VLADIMIR P AOUNOVSKY gary.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian National Identities, 1800S-1900S
    The Shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian National Identities, 1800s-1900s February 2003 Katrin Bozeva-Abazi Department of History McGill University, Montreal A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 Contents 1. Abstract/Resume 3 2. Note on Transliteration and Spelling of Names 6 3. Acknowledgments 7 4. Introduction 8 How "popular" nationalism was created 5. Chapter One 33 Peasants and intellectuals, 1830-1914 6. Chapter Two 78 The invention of the modern Balkan state: Serbia and Bulgaria, 1830-1914 7. Chapter Three 126 The Church and national indoctrination 8. Chapter Four 171 The national army 8. Chapter Five 219 Education and national indoctrination 9. Conclusions 264 10. Bibliography 273 Abstract The nation-state is now the dominant form of sovereign statehood, however, a century and a half ago the political map of Europe comprised only a handful of sovereign states, very few of them nations in the modern sense. Balkan historiography often tends to minimize the complexity of nation-building, either by referring to the national community as to a monolithic and homogenous unit, or simply by neglecting different social groups whose consciousness varied depending on region, gender and generation. Further, Bulgarian and Serbian historiography pay far more attention to the problem of "how" and "why" certain events have happened than to the emergence of national consciousness of the Balkan peoples as a complex and durable process of mental evolution. This dissertation on the concept of nationality in which most Bulgarians and Serbs were educated and socialized examines how the modern idea of nationhood was disseminated among the ordinary people and it presents the complicated process of national indoctrination carried out by various state institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Internal Macedonian-Adrianople Revolutionary Organization and the Idea for Autonomy for Macedonia and Adrianople Thrace
    The Internal Macedonian-Adrianople Revolutionary Organization and the Idea for Autonomy for Macedonia and Adrianople Thrace, 1893-1912 By Martin Valkov Submitted to Central European University Department of History In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Prof. Tolga Esmer Second Reader: Prof. Roumen Daskalov CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2010 “Copyright in the text of this thesis rests with the Author. Copies by any process, either in full or part, may be made only in accordance with the instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European Library. Details may be obtained from the librarian. This page must form a part of any such copies made. Further copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the written permission of the Author.” CEU eTD Collection ii Abstract The current thesis narrates an important episode of the history of South Eastern Europe, namely the history of the Internal Macedonian-Adrianople Revolutionary Organization and its demand for political autonomy within the Ottoman Empire. Far from being “ancient hatreds” the communal conflicts that emerged in Macedonia in this period were a result of the ongoing processes of nationalization among the different communities and the competing visions of their national projects. These conflicts were greatly influenced by inter-imperial rivalries on the Balkans and the combination of increasing interference of the Great European Powers and small Balkan states of the Ottoman domestic affairs. I argue that autonomy was a multidimensional concept covering various meanings white-washed later on into the clean narratives of nationalism and rebirth.
    [Show full text]
  • CM(99)138 Addendum 2
    COUNCIL CONSEIL OF EUROPE DE L'EUROPE Committee of Ministers Ministers ' Deputies CM Documents 689Meeting, 24[-25] November 1999 6 Social and economic questions 6.1 European population committee (CDPO) The demographic characteristics of national minorities in certain European States The demographic characteristics of the main ethnic/national minorities in Bulgaria CM(99)138 Addendum(restricted) 2 27 October 1999 Internet : www.coe.fr/cmline (password access) Intranet : home/cmline Table of contents I. Historical and statistical overview....................................................................................3 1. Hi stori cal B ackground ..............................................................................................3 2. Historical Formation of the Major Ethnic/Minority groups ..................................4 3. Sources of Information and the Reliability of Statistical Data on Ethnic/ Minority Groups...................................................................................................... 6 4. Concepts and Definitions of Nationality and Ethnic/Minority Group ................ 10 5. International Conventions for Population Exchange ............................................11 H. The demographic situation of ethnic/minority groups...............................................13 1. Population Size and Growth .................................................................................. 13 2. Age and Sex Composition ......................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Bulgarian Nationalism and Russia's Influence Upon It
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 5-2014 The rise of Bulgarian nationalism and Russia's influence upon it. Lin Wenshuang University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Wenshuang, Lin, "The rise of Bulgarian nationalism and Russia's influence upon it." (2014). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1548. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/1548 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE RISE OF BULGARIAN NATIONALISM AND RUSSIA‘S INFLUENCE UPON IT by Lin Wenshuang B. A., Beijing Foreign Studies University, China, 1997 M. A., Beijing Foreign Studies University, China, 2002 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Louisville in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Humanities University of Louisville Louisville, Kentucky May 2014 Copyright © 2014 by Lin Wenshuang All Rights Reserved THE RISE OF BULGARIAN NATIONALISM AND RUSSIA‘S INFLUENCE UPON IT by Lin Wenshuang B. A., Beijing Foreign Studies University, China, 1997 M. A., Beijing Foreign Studies University, China, 2002 A Dissertation Approved on April 1, 2014 By the following Dissertation Committee __________________________________ Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Varna Nessebar
    BALKANS A.B.A.T. Balkania Association of Balkan Alternative Tourism Str. Leninova No . 24 1000 – Skopje MACEDONIA Tel / fax : +389 2 32 23 101 Балканска Асоцијација за Алтернативен Туризам Балканија Text Fabio Cotifava, Emilia Kalaydjieva, Beatrice Cotifava Design Kalya Mondo srl, Alessandro Cotifava Photos GoBalkans ltd, Kalya Mondo srl Translation Chris Brewerton - Mantova (Italy) www.cbtraduzioni.it Printing Litocolor snc di Montanari e Rossetti - Guastalla di Reggio Emilia (Italy) Copyright GoBalkans ltd- December 2012 Privately printed edition BALKANIA is an Association of Balkan Alternative tourism which consists of eight member countries from the Balkans and Italy. Its activities include the execution of projects in order to promote the entire Balkan region as a tourist destination. In addition, its purpose is to restore the positive image of the Balkans in the public eye and promote their exceptional natural, histo- rical, cultural and anthropological heritage. The name of the Association, BALKANIA, sounds like a name of a new imaginary land on the territories represented by the hospitality of their population. One of the objectives of the project is to create a virtual geographic region that includes the territories and regions which are today identified with the term BALKANS. The efforts of the Association are aimed at channeling its energy to all forms that are alterna- tive to mass tourism, and which are in terms of the development of macro sectors identified as natural tourism, rural tourism and cultural tourism. BALKANIA is established on 24 .03.2009 in Skopje, in agreement with the Macedonian laws. It is formed by a group of partners from Macedonia, Bulgaria and Italy, with members from Bulgaria, Serbia, Montenegro , Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina ,Greece , Kosovo and Ma- cedonia .
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgaria About This Guide
    Expeditionary Culture Field Guide Varna Veliko Tarnovo Sofia Plovdiv Bulgaria About this Guide This guide is designed to prepare you to deploy to culturally complex environments and achieve mission objectives. The fundamental information contained within will help you understand the cultural dimension of your assigned location and gain skills necessary for success (Photo: Souvenir vendor in the old part of Plovdiv, Bulgaria, courtesy of CultureGrams, ProQuest). The guide consists of 2 parts: ECFG Part 1 “Culture General” provides the foundational knowledge you need to operate effectively in any global environment with a focus on Eastern Europe. Bulgaria Part 2 “Culture Specific” describes unique cultural features of Bulgarian society. It applies culture-general concepts to help increase your knowledge of your assigned deployment location. This section is designed to complement other pre-deployment training (Photo: USAF and Bulgarian senior NCOs discuss enlisted force development concerns). For further information, visit the Air Force Culture and Language Center (AFCLC) website at http://culture.af.mil/ or contact the AFCLC Region Team at [email protected]. Disclaimer: All text is the property of the AFCLC and may not be modified by a change in title, content, or labeling. It may be reproduced in its current format with the express permission of the AFCLC. All photography is provided as a courtesy of the US government, Wikimedia, and other sources. GENERAL CULTURE PART 1 – CULTURE GENERAL What is Culture? Fundamental to all aspects of human existence, culture shapes the way humans view life and functions as a tool we use to adapt to our social and physical environments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Secret Serbian-Bulgarian Treaty of Alliance of 1904 and the Russian Policy in the Balkans Before the Bosnian Crisis
    Wright State University CORE Scholar Browse all Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2007 The Secret Serbian-Bulgarian Treaty of Alliance of 1904 and the Russian Policy in the Balkans Before the Bosnian Crisis Kiril Valtchev Merjanski Wright State University Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all Part of the History Commons Repository Citation Merjanski, Kiril Valtchev, "The Secret Serbian-Bulgarian Treaty of Alliance of 1904 and the Russian Policy in the Balkans Before the Bosnian Crisis" (2007). Browse all Theses and Dissertations. 96. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all/96 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Browse all Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SECRET SERBIAN-BULGARIAN TREATY OF ALLIANCE OF 1904 AND THE RUSSIAN POLICY IN THE BALKANS BEFORE THE BOSNIAN CRISIS A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts By KIRIL VALTCHEV MERJANSKI M.A., Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, Bulgaria 2007 Wright State University COPYRIGHT BY KIRIL VALTCHEV MERJANSKI 2006 WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES Winter Quarter 2007 I hereby recommend that the thesis prepared under my supervision by KIRIL VALTCHEV MERJANSKI entitled THE SECRET SERBIAN-BULGARIAN TREATY OF ALLIANCE OF 1904 AND THE RUSSIAN POLICY IN THE BALKANS BEFORE THE BOSNIAN CRISIS be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS.
    [Show full text]
  • ( 1878 – 1914) Osman KÖSE• After the Conquest of Bulgaria In
    ODÜ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Aratırmaları Dergisi Issn: 1309-9302 http://sobiad.odu.edu.tr Cilt: 3 Sayı: 6 Aralık 2012 THE POLICIES OF THE BULGARIAN STATE TOWARDS THE MINORITIES ( 1878 – 1914) Osman KÖSE• Abstract After the Istanbul Conference in 1876 provided the groundwork, the Bulgarian state emerged as an independent state in 1878 under the Treaty of Berlin. The policy of exterminating the Turks to create a Slavic state, as put into practice by the Russians during the War of 1877-78, was picked up by the Bulgarians after the Russian departure from the scene, followed by acts of massacres and exiles. The Ottoman government not only negotiated with the Bulgarian Principality but also held talks with the Great Powers of Europe to stop the violence in the region against the former Ottoman populations but none yielded the expected results. While the European powers pointed out that they were against the violence and oppression towards the Turks in Bulgaria, they were not more than a spectator to these violent activities of the Bulgarians. Keywords: Bulgarian State, Ottoman Empire, Minorities After the conquest of Bulgaria in 1393, the Ottomans put an end to the administrative functions of the Bulgarian patriarchate and put it under the jurisdiction of that of the Greek Orthodox Church. The Bulgarian allegiance to the Ottoman state continued up until the early nineteenth century when Russians attempted at increasing the Bulgarian national awareness, which, coupled with the unjust administrative reconfigurations by the local Ottoman administrators, caused the Bulgarians to rebel at many points throughout the nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cinematographic Activities of Charles Rider Noble and John Mackenzie in the Balkans (Volume One)
    The Cinematographic Activities of Charles Rider Noble and John Mackenzie in the Balkans (Volume One) The Cinematographic Activities of Charles Rider Noble and John Mackenzie in the Balkans (Volume One) By Peter Kardjilov Translated from Bulgarian by Ivelina Petrova The Cinematographic Activities of Charles Rider Noble and John Mackenzie in the Balkans (Volume One) By Peter Kardjilov Translated from Bulgarian by Ivelina Petrova This book first published 2020 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2020 by Peter Kardjilov All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-4902-X ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-4902-9 TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume One Acknowledgements ix Chapter One.……...…………………………………………….. 1 A Little Bit of History A Few Explanations....……………………………………. 7 The Hectic Holidays of the Tumultuous 1903....…………. 10 Chapter Two.………………………………………………...….. 16 The Ilinden–Preobrazhenie Uprising (the Summer of 1903) The Beginning and the End of The Epic Struggle…......…. 16 Chapter Three…………………………………………………... 23 The Echo in the United Kingdom The Balkan Committee…………………………………… 23 British Correspondents……………………………………. 26 Under Social Pressure……….……………………………. 43 The Photochronicle of the Rebellion……………………… 48 Illustrated Weekly Periodicals…………………………….. 49 Books……………………………………………….……... 62 Private Audiences and Public Events…………….……...... 73 Chapter Four…………………………………………………… 79 The Life and Times of Charles Urban: The Beginning Young and Innocent……………………………………….. 79 The Detroit Prince of the Phonographs…………………… 82 Kinetoscopes……………………………………………… 82 Open Screen – Large Audience…………………………… 85 Maguire & Baucus………………………………………..
    [Show full text]
  • Diplomatic and Journalistic Comments on the Agreement Between the Ottoman Empire and the Principality of Bulgaria in 1904
    Diplomatic and Journalistic Comments on the Agreement between the Ottoman Empire and the Principality of Bulgaria in 1904 Valentin KITANOV Assoc. Prof. Ph.D., South-West University “Neofit Rilski” Department of History, Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria. E-mail: [email protected] Geliş Tarihi: 04.01.2019 Kabul Tarihi: 07.06.2019 ABSTRACT KITANOV, Valentin, Diplomatic and Journalistic Comments on the Agreement between the Ottoman Empire and the Principality of Bulgaria in 1904, CTAD, Year 15, Issue 30 (Fall 2019), pp. 85-108. Bulgarian-Ottoman relations from the end of the XIX-th and the beginning of the XX-th century played an important part in the process of transformation of the European Ottoman heritage into the modern state and political system of the Balkans. The Agreement between the two states from 1904 is a significant page in the history of those relations. The agreement entered into between the Ottoman Empire and the Principality of Bulgaria solved a number of problems at a moment crucial for the development of the Macedonian Question. The agreement was welcomed by the official diplomacy and was interpreted as a step forward to affirming the peace in the European Southeast. In the predominant part of political, diplomatic and journalists’ comments, the emphasis is on the outcomes of the agreement for the Bulgarian state. As far as European opinion-making circles were concerned, through that agreement Bulgaria turned into a guarantor - state for conducting the Murzsteg Reforms. That led the country to a higher-reputation level compared to its neighbour-states Greece and Serbia in terms of the Macedonian Question.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gujarati Lyrics of Kavi Dayarambhal
    The Gujarati Lyrics of Kavi Dayarambhal Rachel Madeline Jackson Dwyer School of Oriental and African Studies Thesis presented to the University of London for the degree PhD July 1995 /f h. \ ProQuest Number: 10673087 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10673087 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 ABSTRACT Kavi Dayarambhal or Dayaram (1777-1852), considered to be one of the three greatest poets of Gujarati, brought to an end not only the age of the great bhakta- poets, but also the age of Gujarati medieval literature. After Dayaram, a new age of Gujarati literature and language began, influenced by Western education and thinking. The three chapters of Part I of the thesis look at the ways of approaching North Indian devotional literature which have informed all subsequent readings of Dayaram in the hundred and fifty years since his death. Chapter 1 is concerned with the treatment by Indologists of the Krsnaite literature in Braj Bhasa, which forms a significant part of Dayaram's literary antecedents.
    [Show full text]