DOCSLIB.ORG

Department of the Interior

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Vol. 76 Tuesday, No. 35 February 22, 2011 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for Nine Bexar County, Texas, Invertebrates; Proposed Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:30 Feb 18, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\22FEP2.SGM 22FEP2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS2 9872 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 22, 2011 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR means that we will post any personal species should be included in the information you provide us (see the designation and why; Fish and Wildlife Service Public Comments section below for • Special management considerations more information). or protections that the features essential 50 CFR Part 17 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: to the conservation of the nine Bexar [Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2010–0091; MO Adam Zerrenner, Field Supervisor, U.S. County invertebrates identified in this 92210–0–009] Fish and Wildlife Service, Austin proposal may require, including Ecological Services Field Office, 10711 managing for the potential effects of RIN 1018–AX11 climate change; Burnet Road, Suite 200, Austin, TX • 78758; by telephone at 512–490–0057 What areas not occupied at the time Endangered and Threatened Wildlife of listing are essential for the and Plants; Designation of Critical x248; or by facsimile at 512–490–0974. If you use a telecommunications device conservation of the species and why; Habitat for Nine Bexar County, Texas, and Invertebrates for the deaf (TDD), call the Federal • Information Relay Service (FIRS) at Site-specific information on AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, 800–877–8339. subsurface geologic barriers to Interior. movement of the species or lack thereof. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: • The taxonomy and status of the ACTION: Proposed rule. Public Comments ground beetle previously identified as SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Rhadine exilis in Black Cat Cave This document consists of: (1) A (proposed Unit 13) and the value of the Wildlife Service (Service), propose to proposed rule to revise designated revise critical habitat designation for the cave and unit for conservation of the critical habitat for the Rhadine exilis species. Rhadine exilis (ground beetle, no (ground beetle, no common name); common name); Rhadine infernalis (3) Land use designations and current Rhadine infernalis (ground beetle, no or planned activities in the subject areas (ground beetle, no common name); common name); Helotes mold beetle Helotes mold beetle (Batrisodes and their possible impacts on proposed (Batrisodes venyivi); Cokendolpher Cave critical habitat. venyivi); Cokendolpher Cave harvestman (Texella cokendolpheri); harvestman (Texella cokendolpheri); (4) Any probable economic, national Robber Baron Cave meshweaver security, or other relevant impacts of Robber Baron Cave meshweaver (Cicurina baronia); Madla Cave (Cicurina baronia); Madla Cave designating any area that may be meshweaver (Cicurina madla); and included in the final designation. We meshweaver (Cicurina madla); and Braken Bat Cave meshweaver (Cicurina Braken Bat Cave meshweaver (Cicurina are particularly interested in any venii); and (2) A proposed rule to impacts on small entities or families, venii) under the Endangered Species designate critical habitat for Act of 1973, as amended (Act). We also and the benefits of including or Government Canyon Bat Cave excluding areas that exhibit these propose to designate critical habitat for meshweaver (Cicurina vespera) and the Government Canyon Bat Cave impacts. Government Canyon Bat Cave spider (5) Information on whether the benefit meshweaver (Cicurina vespera) and (Neoleptoneta microps). Government Canyon Bat Cave spider of an exclusion of any particular area We intend that any final action outweighs the benefit of inclusion under (Neoleptoneta microps). These species resulting from this proposed rule will be are collectively known as the nine Bexar section 4(b)(2) of the Act, in particular based on the best scientific and for those management plans covering County invertebrates. In total, we are commercial data available and be as proposing approximately 6,906 acres specified lands used as mitigation under accurate and as effective as possible. the La Cantera Habitat Conservation (ac) (2,795 hectares (ha)) as critical Therefore, we request comments or habitat for these invertebrates. The Plan (HCP) and lands on which impacts information from other concerned to the species have been authorized proposed critical habitat is located in government agencies, the scientific Bexar County, Texas. under that HCP. Copies of the La community, industry, or other Cantera HCP are available from the DATES: We will consider comments interested parties concerning this Austin Ecological Services Field Office received or postmarked on or before proposed rule. We particularly seek (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). April 25, 2011. We must receive comments concerning: (6) Information on the projected and requests for public hearings, in writing, (1) The reasons why we should or reasonably likely impacts of climate at the address shown in the FOR FURTHER should not designate habitat as ‘‘critical change on any of the nine Bexar County INFORMATION CONTACT section by April 8, habitat’’ under section 4 of the invertebrates and the critical habitat 2011. Endangered Species Act of 1973, as areas we are proposing. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments amended (Act) (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) (7) Information related to our 90-day by one of the following methods: including whether there are threats to finding on the July 8, 2010, petition to • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// the species from human activity, the remove critical habitat Unit 13 from www.regulations.gov. Follow the degree of which can be expected to designation (see Previous Federal instructions for submitting comments increase due to the designation, and Actions below). on Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2010–0091. whether that increase in threat (8) Whether we could improve or • U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public outweighs the benefit of designation modify our approach to designating Comments Processing, Attn: Docket No. such that the designation of critical critical habitat in any way to provide for FWS–R2–ES–2010–0091; Division of habitat may not be prudent. greater public participation and Policy and Directives Management; U.S. (2) Specific information on: understanding, or to better Fish and Wildlife Service; 4401 N. • The amount and distribution of any accommodate public concerns and Fairfax Drive, Suite 222; Arlington, VA of the nine Bexar County invertebrates’ comments. 22203. habitat; You may submit your comments and We will not accept e-mail or faxes. We • What areas occupied at the time of materials concerning this proposed rule will post all comments on http:// listing and that contain features by one of the methods listed in the www.regulations.gov. This generally essential to the conservation of the ADDRESSES section. We will not accept VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:30 Feb 18, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22FEP2.SGM 22FEP2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 22, 2011 / Proposed Rules 9873 comments sent by e-mail or fax or to an Individuals comprising the nine Bexar invertebrates, such as cave crickets address not listed in the ADDRESSES County invertebrates are small, ranging (Mitchell 1971b, p. 250). section. We will post your entire in length from 0.04 inch (in) Subsurface Environment comment—including your personal (1 millimeter (mm)) to 0.4 in (1 identifying information—on http:// centimeter (cm)). They are eyeless, or The nine Bexar County invertebrates www.regulations.gov. You may request essentially eyeless, and most lack require stable temperatures and at the top of your document that we pigment or coloration. Adaptations to constant, high humidity (Barr 1968, withhold personal information such as cave life may include adjustments to the p. 47; Mitchell 1971b, p. 250). They your street address, phone number, or e- low quantities of food, including low have lost the adaptations needed to mail address from public review. metabolism; long legs for efficient prevent desiccation in drier habitats However, we cannot guarantee that we movement; and loss of eyes, possibly as (Howarth 1983, p. 368) and the ability will be able to do so. an energy-saving trade-off (Howarth to detect or cope with more extreme Comments and materials we receive, 1983, pp. 374–376). These invertebrates temperatures (Mitchell 1971a, pp. 300– as well as supporting documentation we may be able to survive from months to 301). Temperatures in caves are used in preparing this proposed rule, years existing on little or no food typically the average annual surface will be available for public inspection (Howarth 1983, p. 375). Average life temperature with little variation on http://www.regulations.gov, or by spans of the listed Bexar County (Howarth 1983, p. 373; Dunlap 1995, p. appointment, during normal business invertebrates in central Texas are 76). Relative humidity is typically near 100 percent in caves that support hours, at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife unknown, but are likely multiple years troglobitic invertebrates (Elliott and Service, Austin Ecological Services for some species (Cicurina spp.), based Reddell 1989, p. 6; Zara 2010, pp. 9–10). FOR FURTHER on observations of juveniles kept in Field Office (see Microhabitat is an important INFORMATION CONTACT). captivity (Veni and Associates 1999, p. 165). Reproductive rates of troglobites component of features occupied by the Background (small, cave-dwelling animals that have nine Bexar County karst invertebrates adapted to their dark surroundings), and has been quantified for three of the It is our intent to discuss only those listed species that occur on Camp topics directly relevant to the such as these nine invertebrates, are typically very low (Poulson and White Bullis, R. exilis, R. infernalis, and Madla designation and revised designation of Cave meshweaver (Zara and Veni 2009, critical habitat in this proposed rule.
Recommended publications
  • Oak Woodland Litter Spiders James Steffen Chicago Botanic Garden

    Oak Woodland Litter Spiders James Steffen Chicago Botanic Garden

    Oak Woodland Litter Spiders James Steffen Chicago Botanic Garden George Retseck Objectives • Learn about Spiders as Animals • Learn to recognize common spiders to family • Learn about spider ecology • Learn to Collect and Preserve Spiders Kingdom - Animalia Phylum - Arthropoda Subphyla - Mandibulata Chelicerata Class - Arachnida Orders - Acari Opiliones Pseudoscorpiones Araneae Spiders Arachnids of Illinois • Order Acari: Mites and Ticks • Order Opiliones: Harvestmen • Order Pseudoscorpiones: Pseudoscorpions • Order Araneae: Spiders! Acari - Soil Mites Characteriscs of Spiders • Usually four pairs of simple eyes although some species may have less • Six pair of appendages: one pair of fangs (instead of mandibles), one pair of pedipalps, and four pair of walking legs • Spinnerets at the end of the abdomen, which are used for spinning silk threads for a variety of purposes, such as the construction of webs, snares, and retreats in which to live or to wrap prey • 1 pair of sensory palps (often much larger in males) between the first pair of legs and the chelicerae used for sperm transfer, prey manipulation, and detection of smells and vibrations • 1 to 2 pairs of book-lungs on the underside of abdomen • Primitively, 2 body regions: Cephalothorax, Abdomen Spider Life Cycle • Eggs in batches (egg sacs) • Hatch inside the egg sac • molt to spiderlings which leave from the egg sac • grows during several more molts (instars) • at final molt, becomes adult – Some long-lived mygalomorphs (tarantulas) molt after adulthood Phenology • Most temperate
  • Bexar County Karst Invertebrates Draft Recovery Plan

    Bexar County Karst Invertebrates Draft Recovery Plan

    Bexar County Karst Invertebrates Draft Recovery Plan March 2008 Bexar County Karst Invertebrates Draft Recovery Plan BEXAR COUNTY KARST INVERTEBRATES DRAFT RECOVERY PLAN Southwest Region U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Albuquerque, New Mexico March 2008 Approved: ___DRAFT_______________________________________ Regional Director, Southwest Region Date U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Concur: __DRAFT____________________________________________ Executive Director Date Texas Parks and Wildlife Department ii Bexar County Karst Invertebrates Draft Recovery Plan DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that the best available science indicates are necessary to recover or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), but are sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, state agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans are guidance and planning documents only. Identification of an action to be implemented by any private or public party does not create a legal obligation beyond existing legal requirements. Nothing in this plan should be construed as a commitment or requirement that any Federal agency obligate or pay funds in contravention of the Anti-Deficiency Act (U.S.C. 1341) or any other law or regulation. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views or the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the Service. They represent the official position of the Service only after the plan has been signed by the Regional Director as approved.
  • Arachnida: Araneae) from the Middle Eocene Messel Maar, Germany

    Arachnida: Araneae) from the Middle Eocene Messel Maar, Germany

    Palaeoentomology 002 (6): 596–601 ISSN 2624-2826 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/pe/ Short PALAEOENTOMOLOGY Copyright © 2019 Magnolia Press Communication ISSN 2624-2834 (online edition) PE https://doi.org/10.11646/palaeoentomology.2.6.10 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E7F92F14-A680-4D30-8CF5-2B27C5AED0AB A new spider (Arachnida: Araneae) from the Middle Eocene Messel Maar, Germany PAUL A. SELDEN1, 2, * & torsten wappler3 1Department of Geology, University of Kansas, 1475 Jayhawk Boulevard, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA. 2Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK. 3Hessisches Landesmuseum Darmstadt, Friedensplatz 1, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany. *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] The Fossil-Lagerstätte of Grube Messel, Germany, has Thomisidae and Salticidae (Schawaller & Ono, 1979; produced some of the most spectacular fossils of the Wunderlich, 1986). The Pliocene lake of Willershausen, Paleogene (Schaal & Ziegler, 1992; Gruber & Micklich, produced by solution of evaporites and subsequent collapse, 2007; Selden & Nudds, 2012; Schaal et al., 2018). However, has produced some remarkably preserved arthropod fossils few arachnids have been discovered or described from this (Briggs et al., 1998), including numerous spider families: World Heritage Site. An araneid spider was reported by Dysderidae, Lycosidae, Thomisidae and Salticidae (Straus, Wunderlich (1986). Wedmann (2018) reported that 160 1967; Schawaller, 1982). All of these localities are much spider specimens were known from Messel although, sadly, younger than Messel. few are well preserved. She figured the araneid mentioned by Wunderlich (1986) and a nicely preserved hersiliid (Wedmann, 2018: figs 7.8–7.9, respectively). Wedmann Material and methods (2018) mentioned six opilionids yet to be described, and figured one (Wedmann, 2018: fig.
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting

    University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting

    TOOLS FOR BIODIVERSITY ANALYSES USING NATURAL HISTORY COLLECTIONS AND REPOSITORIES: DATA MINING, MACHINE LEARNING AND PHYLODIVERSITY By CHANDRA EARL A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2020 1 . © 2020 Chandra Earl 2 . ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank my co-chairs and members of my supervisory committee for their mentoring and generous support, my collaborators and colleagues for their input and support and my parents and siblings for their loving encouragement and interest. 3 . TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................. 3 LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ 5 LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... 6 ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................... 8 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 9 2 GENEDUMPER: A TOOL TO BUILD MEGAPHYLOGENIES FROM GENBANK DATA ...................................................................................................................... 12 Materials and Methods...........................................................................................
  • Butterflies from the Middle Eocene: the Earliest Occurrence of Fossil Papilionoidea (Lepidoptera)

    Butterflies from the Middle Eocene: the Earliest Occurrence of Fossil Papilionoidea (Lepidoptera)

    THE PEARCE- SELLARDS Sctks NUMBER 29 BUTTERFLIES FROM THE MIDDLE EOCENE: THE EARLIEST OCCURRENCE OF FOSSIL PAPILIONOIDEA (LEPIDOPTERA) Christopher J. Durden and Hugh Rose 1978 Texas Memorial Museum/2400 Trinity/Austin, Texas 78705 W. W. Newcomb, Director The Pearce-Sellards Series is an occasional, miscellaneous series of brief reports of museum and museum associated field investigations and other research. Its title seeks to commemorate the first two directors of the Texas Memorial Museum, now both deceased: J. E. Pearce and Dr. E. H. Sellards, professors of anthropology and geology respectively, of The University of Texas. A complete list of Pearce-Sellards papers, as well as other publica- tions of the museum, will be sent upon request. BUTTERFLIES FROM THE MIDDLE EOCENE: THE EARLIEST OCCURRENCE OF FOSSIL PAPILIONOIDEA (LEPIDOPTERA) 1 Christopher J. Durden 2 and Hugh Rose 3 ABSTRACT Three fossil butterflies recently collected from the Green River Shale of Colorado extend the known range of Rhopalocera eight to ten million years back, to 48 Ma. Praepapilio Colorado n. g., n. sp., and P. gracilis n. sp. are primitive Papilionidae related to the modern Baronia brevicornis Salvin, but they require a new subfamily, Praepapilioninae. Riodinella nympha n. g., n. sp. is a primitive member of the Lycaenidae, related to modern Ancyluris, Riodina, and Rhetus, in the tribe Riodinidi. INTRODUCTION With approximately 194,000 living species, the Lepidoptera is, after the Coleoptera with some 350,000, species, the second most diverse order of organisms. It is underrepresented in the fossil record (Scudder 1875, 1891, 1892; Handlirsch 1925;Mackay 1970;Kuhne 1973; Shields 1976).
  • Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

    Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

    1 Justin Augustine (CA Bar No. 235561) Jaclyn Lopez (CA Bar No. 258589) 2 Center for Biological Diversity 351 California Street, Suite 600 3 San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel: (415) 436-9682 4 Fax: (415) 436-9683 [email protected] 5 [email protected] 6 Collette L. Adkins Giese (MN Bar No. 035059X)* Center for Biological Diversity 8640 Coral Sea Street Northeast 7 Minneapolis, MN 55449-5600 Tel: (651) 955-3821 8 Fax: (415) 436-9683 [email protected] 9 Michael W. Graf (CA Bar No. 136172) 10 Law Offices 227 Behrens Street 11 El Cerrito, CA 94530 Tel: (510) 525-7222 12 Fax: (510) 525-1208 [email protected] 13 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Center for Biological Diversity and 14 Pesticide Action Network North America *Seeking admission pro hac vice 15 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 19 20 CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL ) 21 DIVERSITY, a non-profit organization; and ) Case No.__________________ PESTICIDE ACTION NETWORK ) 22 NORTH AMERICA, a non-profit ) organization; ) 23 ) Plaintiffs, ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY 24 ) AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF v. ) 25 ) ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ) 26 AGENCY; and LISA JACKSON, ) Administrator, U.S. EPA; ) 27 ) Defendants. ) 28 _____________________________________ ) Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief 1 1 INTRODUCTION 2 1. This action challenges the failure of Defendants Environmental Protection Agency and 3 Lisa Jackson, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator, (collectively “EPA”) to consult with the 4 United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”) and National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) 5 (collectively “Service”) pursuant to Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C.
  • THE NATURAL HISTORY and TAXONOMY O F CICURINA BRYANTAE EXLINE (ARANEAE, AGELENIDAE ) R. G. Bennett

    THE NATURAL HISTORY and TAXONOMY O F CICURINA BRYANTAE EXLINE (ARANEAE, AGELENIDAE ) R. G. Bennett

    Bennett, R. G. 1985. The natural history and taxonomy of Cicurina bryantae Exline (Araneae, Agelen- idae). J. Arachnol ., 13 :87-96 . THE NATURAL HISTORY AND TAXONOMY O F CICURINA BRYANTAE EXLINE (ARANEAE, AGELENIDAE ) R. G. Bennett Department of Biolog y Western Carolina University Cullowhee, North Carolina 28723 ABSTRACT Since its description in 1936 Cicurina bryantae Exline has been rarely collected . The recen t discovery of the microhabitat preference of this spider has allowed the observation and collection o f substantial numbers of specimens . The following account is compiled from these data . The natural history of the species is discussed (including the interesting tubular retreat constructs inhabited by immatures and adults) . Both sexes are described and figured (the male for the first time) . INTRODUCTION In 1936 Harriet Exline described a new species in the genus Cicurina Menge, 1869 on the basis of female specimens collected at Newfound Gap on the Tennessee-North Caro- lina border in 1930 by Nathan Banks . She named the species bryantae in honor of Eliza- beth Bangs Bryant who was at that time working at the Museum of Comparative Zoology where the specimens were deposited . Since that date, Cicurina bryantae has rarely been collected, its behavior and life history have not been recorded, and the male has not been described . Chamberlin and Ivie (1940) redescribed the female and mentioned two more female s captured by Ivie in 1933 in East Tennessee . Apparently no other specimens were col- lected until 1972 when J. O. Howell found an undescribed Cicurina male in a pitfall trap set in Union County, Georgia .
  • Amphiesmeno- Ptera: the Caddisflies and Lepidoptera

    Amphiesmeno- Ptera: the Caddisflies and Lepidoptera

    CY501-C13[548-606].qxd 2/16/05 12:17 AM Page 548 quark11 27B:CY501:Chapters:Chapter-13: 13Amphiesmeno-Amphiesmenoptera: The ptera:Caddisflies The and Lepidoptera With very few exceptions the life histories of the orders Tri- from Old English traveling cadice men, who pinned bits of choptera (caddisflies)Caddisflies and Lepidoptera (moths and butter- cloth to their and coats to advertise their fabrics. A few species flies) are extremely different; the former have aquatic larvae, actually have terrestrial larvae, but even these are relegated to and the latter nearly always have terrestrial, plant-feeding wet leaf litter, so many defining features of the order concern caterpillars. Nonetheless, the close relationship of these two larval adaptations for an almost wholly aquatic lifestyle (Wig- orders hasLepidoptera essentially never been disputed and is supported gins, 1977, 1996). For example, larvae are apneustic (without by strong morphological (Kristensen, 1975, 1991), molecular spiracles) and respire through a thin, permeable cuticle, (Wheeler et al., 2001; Whiting, 2002), and paleontological evi- some of which have filamentous abdominal gills that are sim- dence. Synapomorphies linking these two orders include het- ple or intricately branched (Figure 13.3). Antennae and the erogametic females; a pair of glands on sternite V (found in tentorium of larvae are reduced, though functional signifi- Trichoptera and in basal moths); dense, long setae on the cance of these features is unknown. Larvae do not have pro- wing membrane (which are modified into scales in Lepi- legs on most abdominal segments, save for a pair of anal pro- doptera); forewing with the anal veins looping up to form a legs that have sclerotized hooks for anchoring the larva in its double “Y” configuration; larva with a fused hypopharynx case.
  • Whole Genome Shotgun Phylogenomics Resolves the Pattern

    Whole Genome Shotgun Phylogenomics Resolves the Pattern

    Whole genome shotgun phylogenomics resolves the pattern and timing of swallowtail butterfly evolution Rémi Allio, Celine Scornavacca, Benoit Nabholz, Anne-Laure Clamens, Felix Sperling, Fabien Condamine To cite this version: Rémi Allio, Celine Scornavacca, Benoit Nabholz, Anne-Laure Clamens, Felix Sperling, et al.. Whole genome shotgun phylogenomics resolves the pattern and timing of swallowtail butterfly evolution. Systematic Biology, Oxford University Press (OUP), 2020, 69 (1), pp.38-60. 10.1093/sysbio/syz030. hal-02125214 HAL Id: hal-02125214 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02125214 Submitted on 10 May 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Running head Shotgun phylogenomics and molecular dating Title proposal Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/sysbio/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/sysbio/syz030/5486398 by guest on 07 May 2019 Whole genome shotgun phylogenomics resolves the pattern and timing of swallowtail butterfly evolution Authors Rémi Allio1*, Céline Scornavacca1,2, Benoit Nabholz1, Anne-Laure Clamens3,4, Felix
  • Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List

    Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List

    Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List Associated Tables The Texas Priority Species List……………..733 Introduction For many years the management and conservation of wildlife species has focused on the individual animal or population of interest. Many times, directing research and conservation plans toward individual species also benefits incidental species; sometimes entire ecosystems. Unfortunately, there are times when highly focused research and conservation of particular species can also harm peripheral species and their habitats. Management that is focused on entire habitats or communities would decrease the possibility of harming those incidental species or their habitats. A holistic management approach would potentially allow species within a community to take care of themselves (Savory 1988); however, the study of particular species of concern is still necessary due to the smaller scale at which individuals are studied. Until we understand all of the parts that make up the whole can we then focus more on the habitat management approach to conservation. Species Conservation In terms of species diversity, Texas is considered the second most diverse state in the Union. Texas has the highest number of bird and reptile taxon and is second in number of plants and mammals in the United States (NatureServe 2002). There have been over 600 species of bird that have been identified within the borders of Texas and 184 known species of mammal, including marine species that inhabit Texas’ coastal waters (Schmidly 2004). It is estimated that approximately 29,000 species of insect in Texas take up residence in every conceivable habitat, including rocky outcroppings, pitcher plant bogs, and on individual species of plants (Riley in publication).
  • Karst Invertebrates Taxonomy

    Karst Invertebrates Taxonomy

    Endangered Karst Invertebrate Taxonomy of Central Texas U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Austin Ecological Services Field Office 10711 Burnet Rd. Suite #200 Austin, TX 78758 Original date: July 28, 2011 Revised on: April 4, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 ENDANGERED KARST INVERTEBRATE TAXONOMY ................................................. 1 2.1 Batrisodes texanus (Coffin Cave mold beetle) ......................................................................... 2 2.2 Batrisodes venyivi (Helotes mold beetle) .................................................................................. 3 2.3 Cicurina baronia (Robber Baron Cave meshweaver) ............................................................... 4 2.4 Cicurina madla (Madla Cave meshweaver) .............................................................................. 5 2.5 Cicurina venii (Braken Bat Cave meshweaver) ........................................................................ 6 2.6 Cicurina vespera (Government Canyon Bat Cave meshweaver) ............................................. 7 2.7 Neoleptoneta microps (Government Canyon Bat Cave spider) ................................................ 8 2.8 Neoleptoneta myopica (Tooth Cave spider) .............................................................................. 9 2.9 Rhadine exilis (no common name) .........................................................................................
  • Araneae (Spider) Photos

    Araneae (Spider) Photos

    Araneae (Spider) Photos Araneae (Spiders) About Information on: Spider Photos of Links to WWW Spiders Spiders of North America Relationships Spider Groups Spider Resources -- An Identification Manual About Spiders As in the other arachnid orders, appendage specialization is very important in the evolution of spiders. In spiders the five pairs of appendages of the prosoma (one of the two main body sections) that follow the chelicerae are the pedipalps followed by four pairs of walking legs. The pedipalps are modified to serve as mating organs by mature male spiders. These modifications are often very complicated and differences in their structure are important characteristics used by araneologists in the classification of spiders. Pedipalps in female spiders are structurally much simpler and are used for sensing, manipulating food and sometimes in locomotion. It is relatively easy to tell mature or nearly mature males from female spiders (at least in most groups) by looking at the pedipalps -- in females they look like functional but small legs while in males the ends tend to be enlarged, often greatly so. In young spiders these differences are not evident. There are also appendages on the opisthosoma (the rear body section, the one with no walking legs) the best known being the spinnerets. In the first spiders there were four pairs of spinnerets. Living spiders may have four e.g., (liphistiomorph spiders) or three pairs (e.g., mygalomorph and ecribellate araneomorphs) or three paris of spinnerets and a silk spinning plate called a cribellum (the earliest and many extant araneomorph spiders). Spinnerets' history as appendages is suggested in part by their being projections away from the opisthosoma and the fact that they may retain muscles for movement Much of the success of spiders traces directly to their extensive use of silk and poison.