DOCSLIB.ORG

What Is at Stake in the US Presidential Election

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
What Is at Stake in the US Presidential Election What Is At Stake In The US Presidential Election By Dr. Paul Craig Roberts Region: USA Global Research, October 27, 2016 In-depth Report: U.S. Elections Paul Craig Roberts Institute for Political Economy 26 October 2016 Here Are The Presstitutes Who Control American’s Minds: “Several top journalists and TV news anchors RSVPed “yes” to attend a private, off-the- record gathering at the New York home of Joel Benenson, the chief campaign strategist for Hillary Clinton, two days before she announced her candidacy in 2015, according to emails Wikileaks has published from John Podesta’s purported accounts. The guest list for an earlier event at the home of John Podesta was limited to reporters who were expected to cover Clinton on the campaign trail.” I just heard an NPR presstitute declare that Texas, a traditional sure thing for Republicans was up for grabs in the presidential election. Little wonder if this report on Zero Hedge is correct. Apparently, the voting machines are already at work stealing the election for Killary. From my long experience in journalism, I know the American public is not very sharp. Nevertheless, it is difficult for me to believe that Americans, whose jobs, careers, and the same for their children and grandchildren, have been sold out by the elites who Hillary represents would actually vote for her. It makes no sense. If this were the case, how did Trump get the Republican nomination despite the vicious presstitute campaign against him? It seems obvious that the majority of Americans who have been suffering terribly at the hands of the One Percent who own Hillary lock, stock, and barrel, will not vote for the people who have ruined their lives and the lives of their children and grandchildren. Furthermore, if Trump’s election is as impossible as the presstitutes tell us—Hillary’s win is 93% certain according to the latest presstitute pronouncement—the vicious 24/7 attacks on Trump would be pointless. Wouldn’t they? Why the constant, frenetic, vicious attacks on a person who has no chance? There are reports that a company associated with a Hillary backer is supplying the voting machines to 16 states, including states that determine election outcomes. I do not know that these reports are correct. However, I do know for a fact that the oligarchic interests that rule America are opposed to Trump being elected President for the simple reason that they are unsure that they would be able to control him. It is hard to believe that dispossessed Americans will vote for Hillary, the representative of those who have dispossessed them, when Trump says he will re-empower the dispossessed. Hillary has denigrated ordinary Americans who, she says, she is so removed from by her wealth that she doesn’t even know who they are. Clearly, Hillary, paid $675,000 by Goldman Sachs for three 20-minute speeches, is not a representative of the people. She represents | 1 the One Percent whose policies have flushed the prospects of ordinary Americans down the toilet. What is really disturbing is the pretense by the presstitute scum that Trump’s lewd admiration for female charms is deemed more important than the prospect of nuclear war. At no time during the presidential primaries or during the current presidential campaign has it been mentioned that Russia is being assaulted daily by propaganda, threatened by military buildups, and being convinced that the United States and its European vassals are planning an attack. A threatened Russia, made insecure by inexplicable hostility and Western propaganda, is a danger manufactured by the neoconservative supporters of Hillary Clinton. If the American people are really so unbelievably stupid that they think lewd remarks about women are more important than avoiding nuclear war, the American people are too stupid to exist. They will deserve the mushroom clouds that will wipe them and everyone else off the face of the earth. Donald Trump is the only candidate in the primaries and the general election who has said that he sees no point in conflict with Russia when Putin has shown nothing but desire to work things out to mutual advantage. In contrast, Hillary has declared the thrice-elected president of Russia to be “the new Hitler” and has threatened Russia with military action. Hillary talks openly about regime change in Russia. Surely, in a free media at least one person in the print and TV media would raise this most important of all points. But where have you seen it? Only in my columns and a few others in the alternative media. In other words, we are about to have an election in which the important issue has played no role. And yet allegedly we are the exceptional, indispensable people, a people’s democracy protected by a free press. In truth, this mythical description of America is merely a cloak for the rule of the Oligarchs. And the Oligarchs are risking life on earth for their continual supremacy. Dr. Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. Roberts’ latest books areThe Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West, How America Was Lost, and The Neoconservative Threat to World Order. The original source of this article is Paul Craig Roberts Institute for Political Economy Copyright © Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, Paul Craig Roberts Institute for Political Economy, 2016 Comment on Global Research Articles on our Facebook page | 2 Become a Member of Global Research Articles by: Dr. Paul Craig Roberts About the author: Paul Craig Roberts, former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury and Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal, has held numerous university appointments. He is a frequent contributor to Global Research. Dr. Roberts can be reached at http://paulcraigroberts.org Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Centre of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post Global Research articles on community internet sites as long the source and copyright are acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original Global Research article. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected] www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner. For media inquiries: [email protected] | 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Women's Rights: Forbidden Subject
    1 WOMEN’S RIGHTS: FORBIDDEN SUBJECT © Pexel.com CONTENTSI Introduction 3 1. Covering women’s rights can kill 4 Miroslava Breach and Gauri Lankesh, journalists who provoked 4 Murdered with impunity 7 2. A range of abuses to silence journalists 8 The figures 8 Elena Milashina – price on her head 9 Online threats 10 3. Leading predators 12 Radical Islamists 12 Pro-life 14 Organized crime 15 4. Authoritarian regimes 17 Judicial harassment in Iran 17 Government blackout 19 Still off limits despite legislative progress 21 5. Shut up or resist 25 Exile when the pressure is too much 25 Resistant voices 26 Interview with Le Monde reporter Annick Cojean 28 Recommendations 30 © RSF © NINTRODUCTIONN “Never forget that a political, economic or religious crisis would suffice to call women’s rights into question,” Simone de Beauvoir wrote in The Second Sex. Contemporary developments unfortunately prove her right. In the United States, outraged protests against President Donald Trump’s sexist remarks erupted in early 2017. In Poland, a bill banning abortion, permitted in certain circumstances since 1993, was submitted to parliament in 2016. In Iraq, a bill endangering women’s rights that included lowering the legal age for marriage was presented to the parliament in Baghdad the same year. Covering women’s issues does not come without danger. A female editor was murdered for denouncing a sexist policy. A reporter was imprisoned for interviewing 3 a rape victim. A woman reporter was physically attacked for defending access to tampons, while a female blogger was threatened online for criticizing a video game.
    [Show full text]
  • Journalisme, « Fake News » & Desinformation
    Organisation des Nations Unies pour l’éducation, la science et la culture JOURNALISME, « FAKE NEWS » & DESINFORMATION Manuel pour l’enseignement et la formation en matière de journalisme Série de l’UNESCO sur l’enseignement du journalisme Publié en 2019 par l’Organisation des Nations Unies pour l’éducation, la science et la culture (UNESCO), 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France et la Fondation Hirondelle, Avenue du Temple 19C, 1012 Lausanne, Suisse. © UNESCO FONDATION HIRONDELLE 2019 ISBN UNESCO : 978-92-3-200195-5 ISBN FONDATION HIRONDELLE : 978-2-9701376-1-0 Œuvre publiée en libre accès sous la licence Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC-BY-SA 3.0 IGO) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/). Les utilisateurs du contenu de la présente publication acceptent les termes d’utilisation de l’Archive ouverte de libre accès UNESCO (www.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-fr). Titre original : Journalism, “Fake News” & Disinformation. Publié en 2018 par l’Organisation des Nations Unies pour l’éducation, la science et la culture (UNESCO), 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France. Les désignations employées dans cette publication et la présentation des données qui y figurent n’impliquent de la part de l’UNESCO aucune prise de position quant au statut juridique des pays, territoires, villes ou zones, ou de leurs autorités, ni quant au tracé de leurs frontières ou limites. Les idées et les opinions exprimées dans cette publication sont celles des auteurs ; elles ne reflètent pas nécessairement les points de vue de l’UNESCO et n’engagent en aucune façon l’Organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • ONLINE HARASSMENT of JOURNALISTS Attack of the Trolls
    ONLINE HARASSMENT OF JOURNALISTS Attack of the trolls 1 SOMMAIREI Introduction 3 1. Online harassment, a disinformation strategy 5 Mexico: “troll gangs” seize control of the news 5 In India, Narendra Modi’s “yoddhas” attack journalists online 6 Targeting investigative reporters and women 7 Censorship, self-censorship, disconnecting and exile 10 2. Hate amplified by the Internet’s virality 13 Censorship bots like “synchronized censorship” 13 Troll behaviour facilitated by filter bubbles 14 3. Harassment in full force 19 Crowd psychology 3.0: “Anyone can be a troll” 19 Companies behind the attacks 20 Terrorist groups conducting online harassment 20 The World Press Freedom Index’s best-ranked countries hit by online harassment 20 Journalists: victims of social network polarization 21 4. Troll armies: threats and propaganda 22 Russia: troll factory web brigades 22 China: “little pink thumbs,” the new Red Guards 24 Turkey: “AK trolls” continue the purge online 25 Algeria: online mercenaries dominate popular Facebook pages 26 Iran: the Islamic Republic’s virtual militias 27 Egypt: “Sisified” media attack online journalists 28 Vietnam: 10,000 “cyber-inspectors” to hunt down dissidents 28 Thailand: jobs for students as government “cyber scouts” 29 Sub-Saharan Africa: persecution moves online 29 5. RSF’s 25 recommendations 30 Tutorial 33 Glossary 35 NINTRODUCTIONN In a new report entitled “Online harassment of journalists: the trolls attack,” Reporters Without Borders (RSF) sheds light on the latest danger for journalists – threats and insults on social networks that are designed to intimidate them into silence. The sources of these threats and insults may be ordinary “trolls” (individuals or communities of individuals hiding behind their screens) or armies of online mercenaries.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Cause No. 2012-27197A MOKARAM-LATIF WEST LOOP, LTD, § in the DISTRICT COURT § Plaintiff, § V. § § 333Rd JUDICIAL DISTRICT
    Cause No. 2012-27197A MOKARAM-LATIF WEST LOOP, LTD, § IN THE DISTRICT COURT § Plaintiff, § § v. § 333rd JUDICIAL DISTRICT § ALI CHOUDHRI, et al., § § Defendants. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS OMNIBUS RESPONSE TO MOTIONS TO RECUSE Pursuant to Judge Susan Brown’s January 15, 2021 Letter Order, Defendant Ali Choudhri (“Choudhri”) files this Omnibus Response (“Response”) to the multiple Motions to Recuse (“Recusal Motions”) filed by PlaintiFF-in-Intervention Ali Mokaram (“Mokaram”) and would respectFully show as follows: PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Convicted felon Christopher Wyatt (“Wyatt”) is like one of those carnival fortune tellers who spews out— instead of generic fortunes — fake texts, lies, and whatever else suits his patron’s needs, if the price is right.1 After being paid to breach his fiduciary and contractual duties to his former employer, Wyatt made Mokaram and his co-recuser Osama Abdullatif’s (“Abdullatif”) wish of fabricated recusal evidence against newly-elected Judge Brittanye Morris (“Judge Morris”) come true. Every time Choudhri presents evidence to rebut Wyatt’s lies, Mokaram and Abdullatif simply put more money in the “Wyatt Lie Box” and out comes another lie. As discussed below, the Recusal Motions stand and fall on the testimony of a convicted felon that is heavily contradicted, ever changing with hoaxes and conspiracy theories, and is completely unreliable. As will be demonstrated herein, Wyatt was recorded confessing that he 1 See, e.g., https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6xEAaV8CIg. 1 intended to sell false evidence to Mokaram’s counsel unless he was paid. After Choudhri refused to be extorted, Wyatt’s testimony was purchased by Choudhri’s adversary AbdullatiF who has a troubled history of filing frivolous recusal motions, sponsoring litigation against his enemies, and was apparently involved in a failed suit seeking to have Judge Morris removed from the ballot before the latest attacks on her began.
    [Show full text]
  • Decoloniality and Extreme Speech
    Decoloniality/extreme speech: Udupa June 2020 Decoloniality and Extreme Speech Sahana Udupa LMU Munich Paper presented at the 65th e-seminar, Media Anthropology Network, European Association of Social Anthropologists, 17–30 June 2020. Abstract: This paper offers preliminary arguments for a decolonial critique of vitriol and disinformation circulating on online media—a phenomenon that has raised moral panic among liberal minded critics. The decolonial critique developed here probes the roots of this moral panic and considers the limits of analysis arising out of such a panic. Rather than viewing this moral panic as an expected reaction to a crisis produced by digital communication, I emphasize the need for historical sensibility and argue that information disorder and hate speech are part of the global process of racialized colonialism that is now increasingly funneling affective infrastructures of the digital in its further perpetuation. Keywords: Extreme speech, hate speech, online media, decoloniality, right-wing populism “Digital revolution is destroying French revolution”, rued a leading German journalist in a private conversation, when we were chitchatting about worldly affairs at a social club, just before the pandemic brought sweeping restrictions on physical gatherings. In stating the crisis so piquantly, she was voicing an anxiety that has gripped liberal voices lately. In her view, values of liberty, freedom and emancipation—established after so much struggle and with much historical weight—are now decimated by hate and lies of digital revolution favoring the far-right. A similar moral panic pervades a section of influential academic analyses around what is seen as an explosion of “fake news”, “filter bubbles”, lies, vitriol, naked slurs and downright comical nuisance that has suffused digital social media conversations, from top leaders to ordinary users.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Providing Safe Refuge to Journalists at Risk
    INDEPENDENT HIGH LEVEL PANEL OF LEGAL EXPERTS ON MEDIA FREEDOM Appointed by the Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury at the request of the Governments of the United Kingdom and Canada Report on Providing Safe Refuge to Journalists at Risk Drafted by: Mr. Can Yeğinsu Barrister and Adjunct Professor of Law Member of the High Level Panel of Legal Experts on Media Freedom This IBAHRI publication is a report of the High Level Panel of Legal Experts on Media Freedom, authored by Panel Member, Can Yeğinsu of 4 New Square Chambers, Columbia Law School, and Georgetown Uni- versity Law Center. The High Level Panel of Legal Experts on Media Freedom is an independent body comprised of fif- teen internationally renowned lawyers and jurists that was convened in July 2019, by Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury, at the request of the UK and Canadian governments. The Panel’s remit is to provide advice and recommendations to governments, including to the members of the Media Freedom Coalition, with a view to preventing and reversing abuses of media freedom around the world. IBAHRI was established under the honorary presidency of Nelson Mandela and is the International Bar As- sociation’s Human Rights Institute, an independent entity working to promote, protect and enforce human rights under a just rule of law, and to preserve the independence of the judiciary and the legal profession worldwide. IBAHRI acts as the Secretariat to the High Level Panel of Legal Experts on Media Freedom. Case Study Images: Ananta Bijoy Das (Case Study I) – alamy Can Dündar and Erdem Gül (Case
    [Show full text]
  • The Assault on Journalism Edited by Ulla Carlsson and Reeta Pöyhtäri
    The Assault on Journalism on Assault The People who exercise their right to freedom of expression through journalism should be able to practice their work without restrictions. They are, nonetheless, the constant targets of violence and threats. In an era of globalization and digitization, no single party can alone carry the responsibility for protection of journalism and freedom of expression. Instead, this responsibility must be assumed jointly by the state, the courts, media companies and journalist organizations, as well as by NGOs and civil society – on national as well as global levels. To support joint efforts to protect journalism, there is a growing need for research- The Assault based knowledge. Acknowledging this need, the aim of this publication is to highlight and fuel journalist safety as a field of research, to encourage worldwide participation, as well as to inspire further dialogues and new research initiatives. The contributions represent diverse perspectives on both empirical and theoretical on Journalism research and offer many quantitatively and qualitatively informed insights. The articles demonstrate that a new important interdisciplinary research field is in fact Building Knowledge to Protect emerging, and that the fundamental issue remains identical: Violence and threats against journalists constitute an attack on freedom of expression. Freedom of Expression Edited by The publication is the result of collaboration between the UNESCO Chair at the University of Gothenburg, UNESCO, IAMCR and a range of other partners.
    [Show full text]
  • I Expected a Male Reporter” a Qualitative Interview-Study of the Kerala Working Culture in Media Newsrooms
    Lunds Universitet Sofia Hermansson Institutionen för kommunikation och medier JOUK10-HT2016 Journalistik Handledare: Mia-Marie Hammarlin 2017-01-13 ”I expected a male reporter” A qualitative interview-study of the Kerala working culture in media newsrooms 2 Acknowledgement First of all, I would like to thank all of my interviewees for sharing your experiences and personal thoughts and opinions with me. Without you, the thesis would not have been able to be done and I am very grateful for your openness and kindness throughout the interview process. Secondly I would like to thank the teachers at Lund University for granting me the Linneaus Palme scholarship which made it possible for me to stay in Kerala for a whole semester, learning and experiencing a lot of different things that I will always bear with me. I would also like to thank all of the students and teachers at DCJ in Kerala, Trivandrum, for being so very helpful throughout the whole stay. 3 Abstract This thesis is a qualitative interview-study of the working conditions for female journalists within an Indian and Keralan context focusing on the female body and spaces. The study takes place in the Keralan society focusing on how women journalists cope with working in a traditional male dominated area and how the female body somehow is seen as an invader in the journalism field, based on pre-assumptions on sex and gender and female placement. From a persepctive of gender theory, mainly drawn on Judith Butler´s and Nirmal Puwar´s theories on gendered spaces and the female body, the study discusses strategies based on the female interviewees own perspectives and experiences working as professional journalists in a society as Kerala, where patriarchal structures still play a dominant role in the division of labor in both the private and the public sphere.
    [Show full text]
  • India: Pursuing Truth in the Face of Intolerance
    India Pursuing truth in the face of intolerance Cover: Indian activists take part in a protest rally against the killing of Indian journalist Gauri Lankesh at the India Gate memorial in New Delhi on September 6, 2017. Indian activists, politicians and journalists demanded a full investigation on September 6 into the murder of Gauri Lankesh, a newspaper editor and outspoken critic of the ruling Hindu nationalist party whose death has sent shockwaves across the country. SAJJAD HUSSAIN/AFP/Getty Images 1 84th PEN International Congress Carles Torner 2 Preface Report authors: Raksha Kumar, Gautam Bhatia, Salil Tripathi Apoorvanand and Nilanjana Roy. Editors: Raksha Kumar, Emma Wadsworth-Jones, 4 Introduction Salil Tripathi, Cathy McCann and Ebony Riddell Bamber Raksha Kumar With special thanks to: Sahar Halaimzai, Michael Halmshaw, Brett Evans Biedsheid and Getty Images 5 “...and then they came for the journalists” Published by PEN International, with the support of the Raksha Kumar Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida) PEN International 7 Law and Free Expression in Today’s India Unit A - Koops Mill Mews Gautam Bhatia 162-164 Abbey Street London SE1 2AN United Kingdom 10 Criminal Defamation: An effective legal gag on free speech PEN International promotes literature and freedom of Raksha Kumar expression and is governedby the PEN Charter and the principles it embodies: unhampered transmission of thought 14 Surviving in a world of ‘virtual’ abusers within each nation and between all nations. Founded in 1921, PEN International connects an international community of Raksha Kumar writers from its Secretariat in London. It is a forum where writers meet freely to discuss their work; it is also a voice speaking out for writers silenced in their own countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Carole Cadwalladr 70 I’M Not Biased
    ” The networked gaslighting of a high-impact investigative reporter Carole Cadwalladr 70 I’m not biased. I’m furious. I’m boiling with rage. The bullies are ”winning. Lies are winning. This assault on truth, justice, democracy is winning. And we can’t even see it. That video18 – created by a British political organisation, facilitated by a global technology platform – will have an impact on other women. On other journalists. It’s another line crossed. Carole Cadwalladr, 2017 18 See later discussion - Cadwalladr is referring to a deep fake video in which her head is superimposed on the body of a woman being repeatedly slapped by a line-up of men, one of whom holds a gun. “ 71 Carole Cadwalladr is a multi-award winning British journalist whose investigative work exposed the Facebook-Cambridge Analytica scandal that ultimately led to the biggest fines in history being imposed on the social media giant by privacy regulators on both sides of the Atlantic. It also resulted in the collapse of the “sketchy” data analytics company closely associated with former US President Donald Trump’s successful 2016 election campaign. But from the moment The Guardian and Observer19 newspapers published the first story in Cadwalladr’s ongoing investigative series into the scandal that compromised the Facebook accounts of up to 87 million users, the journalist became the target of a malign, misogynistic, disinformation-laced campaign of online violence which has grown increasingly threatening over time. This campaign has also created the enabling environment for her ongoing legal harassment by political actors. Cadwalladr’s reportage linked the Cambridge Analytica scandal to both the election of former US President Donald Trump, and Brexit - the referendum which led to the withdrawal of the UK from the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuno Fernando Araújo De Passos a Mediação Entre Cientistas E
    Universidade do Minho Instituto de Ciências Sociais Nuno Fernando Araújo de Passos A mediação entre cientistas e jornalistas. O caso do Gabinete de Comunicação da UMinho A mediação entre cientistas e jornalistas. O caso do Gabinete de Comunicação da UMinho Nuno Fernando Araújo de Passos Araújo Fernando Nuno UMinho | 2018 outubro de 2018 Universidade do Minho Instituto de Ciências Sociais Nuno Fernando Araújo de Passos A mediação entre cientistas e jornalistas. O caso do Gabinete de Comunicação da UMinho Dissertação de Mestrado Mestrado em Ciências da Comunicação Área de Especialização em Publicidade e Relações Públicas Trabalho efetuado sob a orientação da Professora Doutora Sara Balonas outubro de 2018 Agradecimentos - Aos meus filhos Rúben e Luca, pela motivação. À esposa Lénia, pela inspiração e companhia. - Ao meu pai Fernando, com muita saudade. À minha mãe Isabel, por poder contrariar-lhe os nãos protetores. À minha irmã Joana, pela coragem e perseverança omnipresente. - À professora Sara Balonas, pela orientação, erudição, generosidade e por acreditar que era possível. À professora Felisbela Lopes, pelo desafio inicial (sem ele não haveria esta viagem), pela insistência e pela compreensão. - À equipa do GCII – Catarina, Heliana, Júlia, Miguel, Nicolau, Paula, Pedros –, pela paciência e ajuda. E aos ex-elementos, sempre presentes, Carolina, Daniela, Emília, Íris, Joana, Mariana, Sandra, Vanessa. - Aos cientistas e jornalistas entrevistados, à Cristina Neto, à Susana Martins e a todos os que foram abordados sobre a dissertação, pela amável colaboração e pelos preciosos testemunhos para o trabalho. - Aos amigos, pelas palavras de incentivo, mesmo perante a minha ausência temporária. - A quem pensa que não vai conseguir chegar ao fim da caminhada académica.
    [Show full text]
  • The South Asia Press Freedom Report 2019-20
    STATES OF CONTROL: COVID, CUTS AND IMPUNITY SOUTH ASIA PRESS FREEDOM REPORT 2019-2020 18TH ANNUAL SOUTH ASIA PRESS FREEDOM REPORT 2019-2020 2 IFJ PRESS FREEDOM REPORT 2019–2020 3 Cover Photo: AFP photographer Sajjad Hussain works near India Gate during a government-imposed CONTENTS nationwide lockdown as a preventive measure against the spread of the Covid-19 in New Delhi on April 9, This document has been produced 2020. The Indian government’s by the International Federation of response to Covid-19 has led to Journalists (IFJ) on behalf of the controls on media and journalists South Asia Media Solidarity Network being denied access to public interest FOREWORD 4 (SAMSN). information. Afghan Independent Journalists’ Association Contents Photo: Journalists in Kashmir Bangladesh Manobadhikar Sangbadik use a cramped, makeshift media OVERVIEW 5 Forum centre during the internet shutdown to Federation of Nepali Journalists file stories. Free Media Movement, Sri Lanka UNESCO is pleased to support the SPECIAL SECTIONS Indian Journalists’ Union South-Asia Press Freedom Report Journalists Association of Bhutan 2019-20 with limited financial Maldives Journalists’ Association assistance. However, since this report THE PANDEMIC AND 9 Media Development Forum Maldives has been independently developed THE PRESS National Union of Journalists, India by the International Federation of National Union of Journalists, Nepal Journalists, Asia Pacific, therefore, Nepal Press Union UNESCO has no influence over DIGITAL CONTROL 12 Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists the content. The author(s) will be Sri Lanka Working Journalists’ responsible for the choice and the SWITCHED OFF 16 Association presentation of the facts contained in the paper and for the opinions South Asia Media Solidarity Network expressed therein, which will not be (SAMSN) – Defending rights of necessarily those of UNESCO and do COUNTRY CHAPTERS journalists and freedom of expression in not commit the Organisation.
    [Show full text]