DOCSLIB.ORG

Design and Correction of Optical Systems Part 7

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Design and Correction of Optical Systems Part 7 1 Design and Correction of optical Systems Part 7: Geometrical aberrations Summer term 2012 Herbert Gross 2 Overview 2012-04-18 1. Basics 2012-04-18 2. Materials 2012-04-25 3.Components 2012-05-02 4. Paraxial optics 2012-05-09 5. Properties of optical systems 2012-05-16 6.Photometry 2012-05-23 7. Geometrical aberrations 2012-05-30 8. Wave optical aberrations 2012-06-06 9. Fourier optical image formation 2012-06-13 10.Performance criteria 1 2012-06-20 11.Performance criteria 2 2012-06-27 12.Measurement of system quality 2012-07-04 13.Correction of aberrations 1 2012-07-11 14.Optical system classification 2012-07-18 3 Part 7: Contents 2012-05-30 7.1 Representations 7.2 Power expansion of aberrations 7.3 Seidel aberrations 7.4 Surface contributions 7.5 Primary monochromatic aberrations 7.6 Chromatical aberrations 4 Optical Image Formation ° Perfect optical image: All rays coming from one object point intersect in one image point ° Real system with aberrations: 1. transverse aberrations in the image plane 2. longitudinal aberrations from the image plane 3. wave aberrations in the exit pupil 5 Representation of Geometrical Aberrations ° Longitudinal aberrations ∆s Gaussian image plane reference ray logitudinal aberration Gaussian along the reference ray image plane ∆∆∆l' ray ray reference U' point optical axis optical axis ∆∆∆l' o longitudinal aberration system projected on the axis system ∆ s' longitudinal aberration ° Transverse aberrations ∆y transverse reference ray ∆∆∆y' (real or ideal chief ray) aberration ray U' optical axis reference plane system 6 Representation of Geometrical Aberrations ° Angle aberrations ∆u ideal reference ray angular aberration ∆∆∆U' real ray optical axis system x reference sphere Gaussian wavefront reference plane ° Wave aberrations ∆W W > 0 paraxial ray real ray U' C z y' R ∆∆∆ ∆∆∆ s' < 0 7 Transverse Aberrations ° Typical low order polynomial contributions for: Defocus, coma, spherical, lateral color ° This allows a quick classification of real curves linear: quadratic: cubic: offset: defocus coma spherical lateral color 8 Transverse Aberrations ° Classical aberration curves ° Strong relation to spot diagram ° Usually only linear sampling along the x-, y-axis no information in the quadrant of the aperture ∆∆∆y ∆∆∆x 5 µµµm 5 µµµm tangential sagittal -1 y p xp 1 -1 1 Dx λλλ= 486 nm Dy λλλ= 588 nm λλλ= 656 nm 9 Spot Diagram ° All rays start in one point in the object plane ° The entrance pupil is sampled equidistant ° In the exit pupil, the transferred grid may be distorted ° In the image plane a spreaded spot diagram is generated 10 Spot Diagram ° Table with various values of: 1. Field size 486nm 546nm 656nm 2. Color ° Small circle: Airy diameter for axis comparison ° Large circle: Gaussian moment field zone full field 11 Aberrations of a Single Lens ° Single plane-convex lens, y BK7, f = 100 mm, λ = 500 nm ° Spot as a function of field position ° Coma shape rotates according to circular symmetry ° Decrease of performance with the distance to the axis x 12 Polynomial Expansion of the Aberrations ° Paraxial optics: small field and aperture angles Aberrations occur for larger angle values optical ° Two-dimensional Taylor expansion shows field yp axis entrance and aperture dependence pupil xp ° Expansion for one meridional field point y xp coma rays chief ° Pupil: cartesian or polar grid in x p / y p outer rays of ray aperture cone r θθθ ray yp O field sagittal point plane object height y meridional plane axis point object plane 13 Polynomial Expansion of Aberrations ° Taylor expansion of the deviation: k l m y' Image height index k ∆y(y ,' rp ,θ) = ∑ aklm ⋅ y' ⋅rp⋅cos θ lk ,, m rp Pupil height index l θ Pupil azimuth angle index m ° Symmetry invariance: selection of special combinations of exponent terms ° Number of terms: sum of isum number Type of aberration indices in the exponent isum of terms 2 2 image location ° The order of the aperture function depends on the aberration type used: 4 5 primary aberrations, 3rd/4th order primary aberrations: 6 9 secondary aberrations, 5th/6th order - 3rd order in transverse aberration ∆y 8 14 higher order - 4th order in wave aberration W Since the coupling relation 1 ∂W ∆y = − ⋅ R ∂x p changes the order by 1 14 Power Series Expansion of Aberrations ° General case : two coordinates in object plane and pupil ° Rotational symmetry: 3 invariants 1. Scalar product of field vector and pupil vector r r yp P ⋅ F = P ⋅ F ⋅ cos( ϕ F −ϕ P ) = x p ⋅ x + y p ⋅ y z 2. Square of field height xp P yp r r xp P F ⋅ F = F 2 = x 2 + y 2 y 3. Square of pupil height r r 2 2 2 F P ⋅ P = P = x + y x P p p upil F ° y Therefore: x Only special power combinations are physically meaningful Ob ject 15 Polynomial Expansion of Aberrations ° Representation of 2-dimensional Taylor series vs field y and aperture r ° Selection rules: checkerboard filling of the matrix ° Constant sum of exponents according to the order Image Primary location aberrations / Seidel Field y Secondary Spherical Coma Astigmatism aberrations y0 y 1 y 2 y 3 y 4 y 5 y cos y 3 cos y 5 cos 0 Distortion r Tilt Distortion Distortion primary secondary 2 1 r 1 y r cos 2 y 4 r 1 2 1 2 1 cos r Defocus y r y 4 r 1 Aper- Astig./Curvat. 2 y 3 2 ture r cos y r cos 3 r 2 Coma r 3 2 primary y r cos r 3 y 2 r 3 cos 2 3 r Spherical 2 3 primary y r y r 4 cos r 4 Coma secondary r 5 r 5 Spherical secondary 16 Primary Aberrations ° Expansion of the transverse aberration ∆y on image height y and pupil height r ° Lowest order 3 of real aberrations: primary or Seidel aberrations ° Spherical aberration: S 3 2 2 - no dependence on field, valid on axis ∆y = r ⋅ S + r ⋅ y ⋅r ⋅cos θ ⋅C - depends in 3rd order on apertur + y 2 ⋅r ⋅cos 2 θ ⋅ A + y 2 ⋅r ⋅ P ° Coma: C - linear function of field y + y3 ⋅ D - depends in 2rd order on apertur with azimuthal variation ° Astigmatism: A - linear function of apertur with azimuthal variation - quadratic function of field size ° Image curvature (Petzval): P - linear dependence on apertur - quadratic function of field size ° Distortion: D - No dependence on apertur - depends in 3rd order on the field size 17 Transverse Aberrations of Seidel 2 2 4 2 2 3 ° Transverse deviations x' (x' + y' )s' [2x' (x' x' + y' y' )+ x'(x' + y' )]s' s' ∆x'= p p p S'− p p p p p p C' 2n' R'3 2n' R'3 ° Sum of surface p p 2 2 2 2 2 2 contributions x'()x' x' + y' y' s' s' x' ()x' + y' s' s' + p p p A'+ p p p p P' k 3 3 n' R' p 2n' R' p S'= ∑ S j j=1 2 2 3 x'()x' + y' s s'' p k − 3 D' 2n' R' p C'= ∑C j j=1 k 2 2 4 2 2 3 A'= ∑ Aj y' p (x' p + y' p )s' [2y' p (x' x' p + y' y' p )+ y'(x' p + y' p )]s' s' p j=1 ∆y'= 3 S'− 3 C' k 2n'R' p 2n' R' p P'= ∑ Pj 2 2 2 2 2 2 y'()x' x' + y' y' s' s' y' ()x' + y' s' s' j=1 + p p p A'+ p p p p P' k 3 3 n' R' p 2n'R' p D'= ∑ D j 2 2 3 j=1 y'()x' + y' s s'' p − 3 D' 2n' R' p 18 Surface Contributions ° Spherical aberration 1 1 S 4Q2 j = ω j j − n' j s' j njs j n ω Q ° Coma 4 2 1 1 1 pj pj 1 1 C j = ω j Q j − ⋅ ⋅ − n' j s' j njs j ω jQ j s1 s p1 2 2 n ω Q ° Astigmatisms 4 2 1 1 1 pj pj 1 1 Aj = ω j Q j − ⋅ ⋅ − n' j s' j njs j ω jQ j s1 s p1 2 2 ° Field curvature 1 1 n ω Q 1 1 1 1 1 P 4Q2 1 pj pj j = ω j j − ⋅ ⋅ − − ⋅ − n' j s' j njs j ω jQ j s1 s p1 rr n' j n j ° Distortion 2 2 1 1 n ω Q 1 1 1 1 1 n ω Q 1 1 D = ω 4Q2 − ⋅ 1 pj pj ⋅ − − ⋅ − ⋅ 1 pj pj − j j j n' s' n s ω Q s s r n' n ω Q s s j j j j j j 1 p1 r j j j j 1 p1 19 Surface Contributions of Chromatical Aberrations ° Axial chromatical aberration (CHL ) 2 Φ j K j = ω j ν j ° Transverse chromatical aberration s⋅ s n −1 CHV 1p 1 j H j = ⋅ωj ω pjQ pj∆ F sp1− s 1 n jν j ° Total chromatical errors of a system 2 2 s'n CHL h ∆ s'CHL = −2 ⋅KLinse = − n''nω n f ⋅ ν n CHV ∆ y''CHV= y n ⋅∑ H j j=1 20 Surface Contributions ° Abbreviations: hj 1. height ratio of marginal rays ω j = h1 hpj 2. height ratio of chief rays ω pj = hp1 1 1 3. Surface invariant of Abbe Qj= n j ⋅ − rj s j 4. Abbe invariant of the pupil imaging 1 1 Qpj= n j ⋅ − rj s pj 21 Surface Contributions of Seidel ° In 3rd order (Seidel) : Additive contributions of all surfaces of a system to the total aberration 4 (' ' ) 1 1 2 ' ' ' ° Spherical aberration n n −n n n + n s S = − 2 ⋅ − ⋅ − 8n R s' R s' p' R − s'+ p' ° Coma C = 4⋅ ⋅ S s'−R 2 R − s'+ p' A = 4⋅ ⋅ S ° Astigmatisms s'−R 2 R − s'+ p' n (' n'−n) ° Field curvature P = 2⋅ ⋅ S − s'−R 4nRp '2 3 R − s'+ p' n (' n'−n) R − s'+ p' ° Distortion E = 4⋅ ⋅ S − ⋅ s'−R 2nRp '2 s'−R 22 Surface Contributions: Example 200 SI 0 ° Seidel aberrations: Spherical Aberration representation as sum of -200 1000 surface contributions possible SII ° Gives information on correction 0 Coma of a system -1000 ° Example: photographic lens 2000 SIII 0 Astigmatism -2000 1000 SIV 0 Retrofocus F/2.8 Petzval field curvature Field: w=37° -1000 6000 SV 0 Distortion -6000 5 10 150 3 4 2 CI 1 67 8 9 0 Axial color -100 600 CII 0 Lateral color -400 Surface 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Sum 23 Lens Contributions of Seidel ° In 3rd order (Seidel) : Additive contributions of lenses to the total aberration value (stop at lens position) 2 1 n3 n 2 (2 n2 )1 n2 (n )1 + − − 2 ° Spherical aberration Slens = 3 + ⋅ X − ⋅ M − ⋅ M 32 n(n − )1 f n −1 n −1 n + 2 n + 2 1 n +1 ° Coma Clens = 2 ⋅ X − 2( n + )1 M 4ns ' f n −1 1 ° Astigmatisms A = − lens 2 f ⋅ s'2 n +1 ° Field curvature P = − lens 4nf ⋅ s'2 ° Distortion Dlens = 0 24 Spherical Aberration ° Spherical aberration: On axis, circular symmetry ° Perfect focussing near axis: paraxial
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Synopsis of Technical Report
    Tzu-Yu Wu October 26, 2011 Opti 521 – Fall 2011 Introductory to opto-mechanical engineering Synopsis of Technical Report J.M. Sasian. ”Design, assembly, and testing of an objective lens for a free-space photonic switching system”, Optical Engineering 32(8), 1871-1878 (August 1993) 1. Introduction In this paper, the design, lens tolerancing, assembly and testing of a lens with a high numerical aperture over a small field of view are discussed. Although this object lens is specifically designed for a free-space photonic switching system, the concepts in aberration corrections and the approaches to reach a high NA within small field of view are applicable in many applications such as microscope objective lens, laser scan lenses. It also serves as a nice guide for a lens designer to understand the whole process of making a lens system which is not only limited to lens design but included tolerancing, lens ordering, the strategy to maintain the budget, assembly and testing details, and the approximate time required for each task. 2. Summary of the synopsis This synopsis mainly focuses on the general concepts in lens design of a fast objective lens with small field of view. It starts with a brief introduction on the lens requirement and lists the common aberration correction methods. Some explanations in aberration corrections are referenced from “Introduction to Lens Design with practical ZEMAX examples” by Joseph M Geary. Lens tolerancing, assembly and testing are included. Details in phonic switching system are neglected. Interested reader can refer the original paper for more details. 3. Lens requirement Lens requirements Focal length: 15mm Focal ratio: 1.5 Field of View: 7 degrees Wavelength: 850 nm Mapping: F-sin( ) ±1.0 Image surface: Flat Performance: Strehl휃 ratio> 0.95휇푚 over the full field Telecentricity: In the image space Lenses: Glass all spherical surfaces Page 1 of 5 4.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,838,480 Mcintyre Et Al
    USOO583848OA United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,838,480 McIntyre et al. (45) Date of Patent: Nov. 17, 1998 54) OPTICAL SCANNING SYSTEM WITH D. Stephenson, “Diffractive Optical Elements Simplify DIFFRACTIVE OPTICS Scanning Systems”, Laser Focus World, pp. 75-80, Jun. 1995. 75 Inventors: Kevin J. McIntyre, Rochester; G. Michael Morris, Fairport, both of N.Y. 73 Assignee: The University of Rochester, Primary Examiner James Phan Rochester, N.Y. Attorney, Agent, or Firm M. Lukacher; K. Lukacher 57 ABSTRACT 21 Appl. No.: 639,588 22 Filed: Apr. 29, 1996 An improved optical System having diffractive optic ele ments is provided for Scanning a beam. This optical System (51) Int. Cl. ............................................... GO2B 26/08 includes a laser Source for emitting a laser beam along a first 52 U.S. Cl. .......................... 359/205; 359/206; 359/207; path. A deflector, Such as a rotating polygonal mirror, 359/212; 359/216; 359/17 intersects the first path and translates the beam into a 58 Field of Search ..................................... 359/205-207, Scanning beam which moves along a Second path in a Scan 359/212-219, 17, 19,563, 568-570,900 plane. A lens System (F-0 lens) in the Second path has first 56) References Cited and Second elements for focusing the Scanning beam onto an image plane transverse to the Scan plane. The first and U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS Second elements each have a cylindrical, non-toric lens. One 4,176,907 12/1979 Matsumoto et al. .................... 359/217 or both of the first and second elements also provide a 5,031,979 7/1991 Itabashi.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterisation Studies on the Optics of the Prototype Fluorescence Telescope FAMOUS
    Characterisation studies on the optics of the prototype fluorescence telescope FAMOUS von Hans Michael Eichler Masterarbeit in Physik vorgelegt der Fakultät für Mathematik, Informatik und Naturwissenschaften der Rheinisch-Westfälischen Technischen Hochschule Aachen im März 2014 angefertigt im III. Physikalischen Institut A bei Prof. Dr. Thomas Hebbeker Erstgutachter und Betreuer Zweitgutachter Prof. Dr. Thomas Hebbeker Prof. Dr. Christopher Wiebusch III. Physikalisches Institut A III. Physikalisches Institut B RWTH Aachen University RWTH Aachen University Abstract In this thesis, the Fresnel lens of the prototype fluorescence telescope FAMOUS, which is built at the III. Physikalisches Institut of the RWTH Aachen, is characterised. Due to the usage of silicon photomultipliers as active detector component, an adequate optical performance is required. The optical performance and transmittance of the used Fresnel lens and the qualification for the operation in the fluorescence telescope FAMOUS is examined in several series of measurements and simulations. Zusammenfassung In dieser Arbeit wird die Fresnel-Linse des Prototyp-Fluoreszenz-Teleskops FAMOUS charakterisiert, welches am III. Physikalischen Institut der RWTH Aachen gebaut wird. Durch die Verwendung von Silizium-Photomultipliern als aktive Detektorkomponente werden besondere Anforderungen an die Optik des Teleskops gestellt. In verschiedenen Messreihen und Simulationen wird untersucht, ob die Abbildungsqualität und die Transmission der verwendeten Fresnel-Linse für die Verwendung in diesem Fluoreszenz- Teleskop geeignet ist. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Cosmic rays 3 2.1 Energy spectrum . 4 2.2 Sources of cosmic rays . 6 2.3 Extensive air showers . 7 3. Fluorescence light detection 11 3.1 Fluorescence yield . 11 3.2 The Pierre Auger fluorescence detector . 14 3.3 FAMOUS .
    [Show full text]
  • Wavefront Sensing for Adaptive Optics MARCOS VAN DAM & RICHARD CLARE W.M
    Wavefront sensing for adaptive optics MARCOS VAN DAM & RICHARD CLARE W.M. Keck Observatory Acknowledgments Wilson Mizner : "If you steal from one author it's plagiarism; if you steal from many it's research." Thanks to: Richard Lane, Lisa Poyneer, Gary Chanan, Jerry Nelson Outline Wavefront sensing Shack-Hartmann Pyramid Curvature Phase retrieval Gerchberg-Saxton algorithm Phase diversity Properties of a wave-front sensor Localization: the measurements should relate to a region of the aperture. Linearization: want a linear relationship between the wave-front and the intensity measurements. Broadband: the sensor should operate over a wide range of wavelengths. => Geometric Optics regime BUT: Very suboptimal (see talk by GUYON on Friday) Effect of the wave-front slope A slope in the wave-front causes an incoming photon to be displaced by x = zWx There is a linear relationship between the mean slope of the wavefront and the displacement of an image Wavelength-independent W(x) z x Shack-Hartmann The aperture is subdivided using a lenslet array. Spots are formed underneath each lenslet. The displacement of the spot is proportional to the wave-front slope. Shack-Hartmann spots 45-degree astigmatism Typical vision science WFS Lenslets CCD Many pixels per subaperture Typical Astronomy WFS Former Keck AO WFS sensor 21 pixels 2 mm 3x3 pixels/subap 200 μ lenslets CCD relay lens 3.15 reduction Centroiding The performance of the Shack-Hartmann sensor depends on how well the displacement of the spot is estimated. The displacement is usually estimated using the centroid (center-of-mass) estimator. x I(x, y) y I(x, y) s = sy = x I(x, y) I(x, y) This is the optimal estimator for the case where the spot is Gaussian distributed and the noise is Poisson.
    [Show full text]
  • Lab #5 Shack-Hartmann Wavefront Sensor
    EELE 482 Lab #5 Lab #5 Shack-Hartmann Wavefront Sensor (1 week) Contents: 1. Summary of Measurements 2 2. New Equipment and Background Information 2 3. Beam Characterization of the HeNe Laser 4 4. Maximum wavefront tilt 4 5. Spatially Filtered Beam 4 6. References 4 Shack-Hartmann Page 1 last edited 10/5/18 EELE 482 Lab #5 1. Summary of Measurements HeNe Laser Beam Characterization 1. Use the WFS to measure both beam radius w and wavefront radius R at several locations along the beam from the HeNe laser. Is the beam well described by the simple Gaussian beam model we have assumed? How do the WFS measurements compare to the chopper measurements made previously? Characterization of WFS maximum sensible wavefront gradient 2. Tilt the wavefront sensor with respect to the HeNe beam while monitoring the measured wavefront tilt. Determine the angle beyond which which the data is no longer valid. Investigation of wavefront quality after spatial filtering and collimation with various lenses 3. Use a single-mode fiber as a spatial filter. Characterize the beam emerging from the fiber for wavefront quality, and then measure the wavefront after collimation using a PCX lens and a doublet. Quantify the aberrations of these lenses. 2. New Equipment and Background Information 1. Shack-Hartmann Wavefront Sensor (WFS) The WFS uses an array of microlenses in front of a CMOS camera, with the camera sensor located at the back focal plane of the microlenses. Locally, the input beam will look like a portion of a plane wave across the small aperture of the microlens, and the beam will come to a focus on the camera with the center position of the focused spot determined by the local tilt of the wavefront.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 2: Geometrical Optics
    Lecture 2: Geometrical Optics Outline 1 Geometrical Approximation 2 Lenses 3 Mirrors 4 Optical Systems 5 Images and Pupils 6 Aberrations Christoph U. Keller, Leiden Observatory, [email protected] Lecture 2: Geometrical Optics 1 Ideal Optics ideal optics: spherical waves from any point in object space are imaged into points in image space corresponding points are called conjugate points focal point: center of converging or diverging spherical wavefront object space and image space are reversible Christoph U. Keller, Leiden Observatory, [email protected] Lecture 2: Geometrical Optics 2 Geometrical Optics rays are normal to locally flat wave (locations of constant phase) rays are reflected and refracted according to Fresnel equations phase is neglected ) incoherent sum rays can carry polarization information optical system is finite ) diffraction geometrical optics neglects diffraction effects: λ ) 0 physical optics λ > 0 simplicity of geometrical optics mostly outweighs limitations Christoph U. Keller, Leiden Observatory, [email protected] Lecture 2: Geometrical Optics 3 Lenses Surface Shape of Perfect Lens lens material has index of refraction n o z(r) · n + z(r) f = constant n · z(r) + pr 2 + (f − z(r))2 = constant solution z(r) is hyperbola with eccentricity e = n > 1 Christoph U. Keller, Leiden Observatory, [email protected] Lecture 2: Geometrical Optics 4 Paraxial Optics Assumptions: 1 assumption 1: Snell’s law for small angles of incidence (sin φ ≈ φ) 2 assumption 2: ray hight h small so that optics curvature can be neglected (plane optics, (cos φ ≈ 1)) 3 assumption 3: tanφ ≈ φ = h=f 4 decent until about 10 degrees Christoph U.
    [Show full text]
  • Optical Systems for Laser Scanners1 to Provide Yet Another Perspective
    2 OpticalSystemsforLaserScanners Stephen F. Sagan NeoOptics Lexington, Massachusetts, USA CONTENTS 2.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 70 2.2 Laser Scanner Configurations ............................................................................................71 2.2.1 Objective Scanning..................................................................................................71 2.2.2 Post-objective Scanning ..........................................................................................72 2.2.3 Pre-objective Scanning............................................................................................72 2.3 Optical Design and Optimization: Overview .................................................................72 2.4 Optical Invariants ................................................................................................................ 74 2.4.1 The Diffraction Limit .............................................................................................. 76 2.4.2 Real Gaussian Beams .............................................................................................. 76 2.4.3 Truncation Ratio ....................................................................................................... 77 2.5 Performance Issues .............................................................................................................. 79 2.5.1 Image Irradiance ......................................................................................................79
    [Show full text]
  • Utilization of a Curved Focal Surface Array in a 3.5M Wide Field of View Telescope
    Utilization of a curved focal surface array in a 3.5m wide field of view telescope Lt. Col. Travis Blake Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Tactical Technology Office E. Pearce, J. A. Gregory, A. Smith, R. Lambour, R. Shah, D. Woods, W. Faccenda Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lincoln Laboratory S. Sundbeck Schafer Corporation TMD M. Bolden CENTRA Technology, Inc. ABSTRACT Wide field of view optical telescopes have a range of uses for both astronomical and space-surveillance purposes. In designing these systems, a number of factors must be taken into account and design trades accomplished to best balance the performance and cost constraints of the system. One design trade that has been discussed over the past decade is the curving of the digital focal surface array to meet the field curvature versus using optical elements to flatten the field curvature for a more traditional focal plane array. For the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) 3.5-m Space Surveillance Telescope (SST)), the choice was made to curve the array to best satisfy the stressing telescope performance parameters, along with programmatic challenges. The results of this design choice led to a system that meets all of the initial program goals and dramatically improves the nation’s space surveillance capabilities. This paper will discuss the implementation of the curved focal-surface array, the performance achieved by the array, and the cost level-of-effort difference between the curved array versus a typical flat one. 1. INTRODUCTION Curved-detector technology for applications in astronomy, remote sensing, and, more recently, medical imaging has been a component in the decision-making process for fielded systems and products in these and other various disciplines for many decades.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Method for Coma-Free Alignment of Transmission Electron Microscopes and Digital Determination of Aberration Coefficients
    Scanning Microscopy Vol. 11, 1997 (Pages 251-256) 0891-7035/97$5.00+.25 Scanning Microscopy International, Chicago (AMF O’Hare),Coma-free IL 60666 alignment USA A NEW METHOD FOR COMA-FREE ALIGNMENT OF TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPES AND DIGITAL DETERMINATION OF ABERRATION COEFFICIENTS G. Ade* and R. Lauer Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Bundesallee 100, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany Abstract Introduction A simple method of finding the coma-free axis in Electron micrographs are affected by coma when the electron microscopes with high brightness guns and direction of illumination does not coincide with the direction quantifying the relevant aberration coefficients has been of the true optical axis of the electron microscope. Hence, developed which requires only a single image of a elimination of coma is of great importance in high-resolution monocrystal. Coma-free alignment can be achieved by work. With increasing resolution, the effects of three-fold means of an appropriate tilt of the electron beam incident astigmatism and other axial aberrations grow also in on the crystal. Using a small condenser aperture, the zone importance. To reduce the effect of aberrations, methods axis of the crystral is adjusted parallel to the beam and the for coma-free alignment of electron microscopes and beam is focused on the observation plane. In the slightly accurate determination of aberration coefficients are, there- defocused image of the crystal, several spots representing fore, required. the diffracted beams and the undiffracted one can be A method for coma-free alignment was originally detected. Quantitative values for the beam tilt required for proposed in an early paper by Zemlin et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Lens Design OPTI 517 Seidel Aberration Coefficients
    Lens Design OPTI 517 Seidel aberration coefficients Prof. Jose Sasian OPTI 517 Fourth-order terms 2 2 W H, W040 W131H W222 H 2 W220 H H W311H H H W400 H H Spherical aberration Coma Astigmatism (cylindrical aberration!) Field curvature Distortion Piston Prof. Jose Sasian OPTI 517 Coordinate system Prof. Jose Sasian OPTI 517 Spherical aberration h 2 h 4 Z 2r 8r 3 u h y1 y 2r W n'[PB'] n'[PA' ] n'[PB'] n[PB] We have a spherical surface of radius of curvature r, a ray intersecting the surface at point P, intersecting the reference sphere at B’, intersecting the wavefront in object space at B and in image space at A’, and passing in image space by the point Q’’ in the optical axis. The reference sphere in object space is centered at Q and in image space is centered at Q’ Question: how do we draw the first order Prof. Jose Sasian OPTI 517 marginal ray in image space? [PQ]2 s Z 2 h 2 s 2 2sZ Z 2 h 2 2 4 4 2 h h h h 2s 3 2 2r 8r 4r [PB] [OQ] [PQ] s 2 1 2 2 s h 2 1 1 h 4 1 1 h 4 1 1 2 2 s r 8r s r 8s s r 2 4 2 h s h s s 1 1 1 u s 2 r 4r 2 s 2 r h y1 y 2r Prof. Jose Sasian OPTI 517 Spherical aberration ' ' [PB] [OQ] [PQ] [PB'] [OQ ] [PQ ] 2 2 2 4 y 2 u 1 1 y 4 1 1 y u 1 1 y 1 1 1 y 1 y ' 2 ' 2 2 2r s r 8r s r 2 2r s r 8r s r 4 2 4 2 y 1 1 y 1 1 8s ' s ' r 8s s r W n '[PB'] n[PB] y 2 u 1 1 1 1 1 y n ' n ' 2 r s r s r y 4 1 1 1 1 n ' n 2 ' 8r s r s r 2 2 y 4 n ' 1 1 n 1 1 ' ' 8 s s r s s r Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tilted Interference Filter in a Converging Beam
    A&A 533, A82 (2011) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117305 & c ESO 2011 Astrophysics A tilted interference filter in a converging beam M. G. Löfdahl1,2,V.M.J.Henriques1,2, and D. Kiselman1,2 1 Institute for Solar Physics, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, AlbaNova University Center, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden e-mail: [email protected] 2 Stockholm Observatory, Dept. of Astronomy, Stockholm University, AlbaNova University Center, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden Received 20 May 2011 / Accepted 26 July 2011 ABSTRACT Context. Narrow-band interference filters can be tuned toward shorter wavelengths by tilting them from the perpendicular to the optical axis. This can be used as a cheap alternative to real tunable filters, such as Fabry-Pérot interferometers and Lyot filters. At the Swedish 1-meter Solar Telescope, such a setup is used to scan through the blue wing of the Ca ii H line. Because the filter is mounted in a converging beam, the incident angle varies over the pupil, which causes a variation of the transmission over the pupil, different for each wavelength within the passband. This causes broadening of the filter transmission profile and degradation of the image quality. Aims. We want to characterize the properties of our filter, at normal incidence as well as at different tilt angles. Knowing the broadened profile is important for the interpretation of the solar images. Compensating the images for the degrading effects will improve the resolution and remove one source of image contrast degradation. In particular, we need to solve the latter problem for images that are also compensated for blurring caused by atmospheric turbulence.
    [Show full text]
  • An Easy Way to Relate Optical Element Motion to System Pointing Stability
    An easy way to relate optical element motion to system pointing stability J. H. Burge College of Optical Sciences University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA [email protected], (520-621-8182) ABSTRACT The optomechanical engineering for mounting lenses and mirrors in imaging systems is frequently driven by the pointing or jitter requirements for the system. A simple set of rules was developed that allow the engineer to quickly determine the coupling between motion of an optical element and a change in the system line of sight. Examples are shown for cases of lenses, mirrors, and optical subsystems. The derivation of the stationary point for rotation is also provided. Small rotation of the system about this point does not cause image motion. Keywords: Optical alignment, optomechanics, pointing stability, geometrical optics 1. INTRODUCTION Optical systems can be quite complex, using lenses, mirrors, and prisms to create and relay optical images from one space to another. The stability of the system line of sight depends on the mechanical stability of the components and the optical sensitivity of the system. In general, tilt or decenter motion in an optical element will cause the image to shift laterally. The sensitivity to motion of the optical element is usually determined using computer simulation in an optical design code. If done correctly, the computer simulation will provide accurate and complete data for the engineer, allowing the construction of an error budget and complete tolerance analysis. However, the computer-derived sensitivity may not provide the engineer with insight that could be valuable for understanding and reducing the sensitivities or for troubleshooting in the field.
    [Show full text]