DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Evaluation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Evaluation ENDLINE REPORT COMMUNICATION FOR EDUCATION AND IMPROVED SCHOOL GOVERNANCE (C4E) DECEMBER 2018 Disclaimer All opinions expressed in this evaluation report are that of the evalutor (Real-Time Evaluation, Ratha Lork and Kurt Bredenberg) or those interviewed (where indicated) and do not necessarily reflect of the views of CARE or UNICEF. Map of Target Areas List of Tables Table 2.1: Summary of SamplE SizE by ProvincE Table 2.2: Summary of Data CollEction MEthodologiEs EmployEd by KEy Informant and RElEvant Forms Table 3.1: Background CharactEristics of HousEholds Table 3.2: FrEquEncy of ChildrEn’s AttEndancE in thE Last 3 Months Table 3.3: AwarEnEss LEvEls of ChildrEn’s AbsencE Table 3.4: ParEnts Who IndicatEd That ThEir ChildrEn HavE to EngagE in Employ- ment Table 3.5: ParEnts Who HavE EvEr AllowEd ThEir ChildrEn to Stay HomE WhEn NOT ill Table 3.6: PErcEivEd SEriousnEss of StudEnt AbsEntEEism among Local & Education Officials Table 3.7: ParEntal AttitudEs About thE ImportancE of AttEnding School Table 3.8: FrEquEncy of HElping ChildrEn at HomE with HomEwork Table 3.9: PErcEptions among Officials REgarding thE DEgrEE to Which ParEnts ValuE Education Table 3.10: ParEnts Indicating, ThEy Know onE or MorE SSC mEmbErs at ThEir Child’s School. Table 3.11: Quality of ParEntal RElationship with SSC Table 3.12: ParEnts Indicating, ThEy AwarE thE Campaigns. Table 3.13: Campaigns Through Which Communication ChannEls. Table 3.14: Officials’ PErcEption of thE DEgrEE of ParEntal AwarEnEss of about In- formation Campaigns Table 3.15: ParEntal Opinion about thE RolEs and REsponsibilitiEs of SSCs (among thosE who havE evEr bEEn SSC mEmbErs) Table 3.16: Officials’ PErcEption of thE RElationship bEtwEEn School and Community Table 3.17: Variation on KEy InvEstigativE ParamEtErs by GEndEr and Ethnicity Table 3.18: Final BasElinE and Post-trEatmEnt Indicator ValuEs (TrEatmEnt and Con- trol Groups) Table of Contents Disclaimer Map of Target Areas List of Tables Acronyms and Abbreviations Executive Summary 1. INTRODUCTION 7 1.1 Background 7 1.2 PurposE and ObjEctivE of thE BasElinE AssEssmEnt 8 2. METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH 8 2.1 GenEral FramEwork and Focus 8 2.2 SamplE Construction 9 2.3 Data CollEction MEthods and SurvEy InstrumEnts 11 2.4 Data ManagEmEnt 12 2.5 Data TrEatmEnt 13 3. ASSESSMENT FINDINGS 14 3.1 HousEhold ReprEsEntation 14 3.2 School AttEndancE and AssociatEd CausEs 15 3.3 AttitudEs about thE ImportancE of Education 17 3.4 Community Education NEtworks and ChannEls of Communication 18 3.5 Variations on KEy ParamEtErs by GEndEr and Ethnicity 21 3.6 Comparison of KEy AttitudEs bEtwEEn TrEatmEnt and Control Groups and 22 OthEr StakEholdErs 4. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSIONS 26 ANNEXES 31 Annex 1: List of TrEatmEnt and Control VillagEs 31 Annex 2: CasE StudiEs 33 Annex 3: List of Data CollEction Forms 34 Annex 4: Summary List of All Data TablEs 53 Annex 5: CompositE REcord of Focus Group Discussions 62 Annex 6: List of KEy Informants 65 Page | 1 Acronyms and Abbreviations CAPI ComputEr AssistEd PErsonal IntErviEwing C4E Communication for Education DOE District OfficE of Education DTMT District Training and Monitoring Teams GIS GEographical Information SystEm MoEYS Ministry of Education, Youth, and Sport POE Provincial OfficE of Education PED Primary Education DEpartmEnt SSC School Support CommittEE ToR TErms of REfErEncE Page | 2 Executive Summary Background ThE prEsEnt rEport describEs an internal assessment of the impact of the Communication for Ed- ucation ProjEct (C4E) implEmEntEd by CARE in Ratanak Kiri and Mondulkiri ProvincEs. UndEr thE projEct, a communication for development campaign was designEd by CARE, in collaboration with UNICEF, MoEYS/PED and local govErnmEnt countErparts, to promotE bettEr awarEnEss and positivE attitudinal changEs toward valuEs of Education to incrEasE community dEmand for good quality education among parEnts, carEgivErs and community mEmbErs. ThE campaign also sought to strEngthEn pErcEptions of stakEholdErs’ rolE in supporting inclusivE lEarning EnvironmEnts for all childrEn at school. ThE communication channEls usEd by thE campaign includEd sound rEcord- ings (E.g., radio, public announcEmEnts, Etc.), posters, social mEdia, and othEr forms of communi- cation. In tEchnical tErms, the projEct focusEs on the rolE of what arE known as District-based Training and Monitoring Teams (DTMT1) and School Support Committees (SSCs) and their man- datE to promotE strEngthEnEd demand for inclusivE quality Education among community mEm- bers and other stakeholders. MembErs of thE School Support CommittEEs (SSCs) led thE cam- paign to improvE attitudEs and bEhaviors as thEsE rElate to Education. ThEsE champions facilitat- Ed a Human-Centered Design Approach to thE dEvElopmEnt of thE campaign and plannEd evEnts in rEmotE communitiEs targEtEd by thE projEct. ThE prEsEnt assEssmEnt took thE form of basElinE and EndlinE data collEction activitiEs to dEtEr- minE the ExtEnt of impacts during the four-month pEriod of actual implEmentation. ThE endlinE survEy itself occurrEd in DEcEmbEr 2018, approximatEly four months aftEr thE baselinE survEy. Impacts were primarily assessed through a review of changes in behaviors and attitudes among key stakEholdErs including housEholds, villagE chiefs, and Education officials. RElatEdly, thEsE impacts arE thought to also reflect the effectiveness of District Training and Monitoring Teams (DTMT1) and School Support CommittEEs in effEcting thE dEsirEd changEs. Specifically, thE basElinE-endlinE assEssmEnt sought to documEnt stakEholdErs’ undErstanding of thE importancE of education, thEir awareness of this importancE, and possiblE changEs in behav- ior and practicE that may result from subsEquEnt projEct intervEntions. AchiEving this objEctivE requirEd thE design of an assessment methodology, thE devElopmEnt of data collEction tools, thE training of enumerators, and data analysis procEdurEs. ThE prEsEnt report documEnts thE out- comEs of thEsE efforts, building on a basElinE assessment report that was implEmEntEd and com- plEtEd in August-SeptEmbEr 2018. Methodology Employed ThE currEnt assessmEnt collEctEd data from housEholds in a total of 40 villagE-communitiEs1 rep- resEnting a mix of rural and remotE locations as well as villagE chiEfs and educational officials in Ratanak Kiri and Mondul Kiri Provinces. A prEpondErancE of thE housEholds visitEd during thE assessment were of indigEnous ethnicity (about two-thirds). Data was collEctEd from 595 re- spondEnts at basElinE and 598 respondEnts at endline. Data collEctEd from thE various stakE- holdErs was triangulated to chEck for validity and areas of inconsistEncy. Investigators utilizEd focus group discussions and interviews, as key methodologiEs for data collEction. In ordEr to ex- peditE thE collEction and tabulation of data, information was immEdiately encoded into mobilE 1 Inclusive of 30 treatment villages and 10 control villages. Page | 3 devicEs that usE spEcializEd softwarE designEd for resEarch purposEs. Research Questions: 1. To what ExtEnt doEs communi- Conclusions about program impact arE basEd on a comparison ty undErstand about the im- of basElinE and endlinE valuEs. ThE instrumEntation for both portancE of Education? 2. To what ExtEnt do campaign survEys has beEn kept in largE part thE samE. BasEd on discus- activities rEach the community? sions with CARE, a small control group (10 villagEs) was includ- 3. What has bEEn changEd as a ed in thE data collEction methodology for comparison purposEs. result of thE campaign- Communi- cation for Education (C4E)? ThE dEvElopmEnt of data collEction tools and stratEgiEs wErE 4. What arE thE kEy rEcommEn- closEly guidEd by key research quEstions idEntifiEd in thE TErms dations to raisE furthEr undEr- standing of thE importancE of Edu- of REfErEncE for thE baseline assessmEnt. This includEd thE four cation? resEarch quEstions summarizEd in thE box to thE right. Summary of Impacts Key Impacts Indicated in Endline Data ThE prEsEnt EndlinE survEy found pos- Assessment Parameter Changes from Baseline That Exceed itivE impacts among 11 or 55% of thE Comparable Movement in a assessment parameters investigated Control Group 1. % of parents who have children as part of the evaluation process for Decreased by -7.2% frequently absent thE C4E projEct. ThEsE impacts arE 2. % of parents who have ever al- summarizEd in Box 4.1. Impact in this lowed their children to stay home Decreased by -6.9% when not ill casE is dEfinEd as thE movEmEnt of an 3. % of parents who interact with Increased by 14.2% indicator in a dEsirEd dirEction among SSC ‘often’ membErs of the trEatment group that 4. % of parents who have ever re- ceived information about educa- Increased by 10.0% exceeds comparable movement along tion ‘Often’ (Outreach Efforts) thE samE indicator in a control group. 5. % of officials who believe that Increased by 43.3% among Village Chiefs ThErE wErE in all ninE othEr assEss- communities value education ‘a Increased by 8.5% among Education great deal’ Officials ment parameters or 45% of thE total 6. % of officials who believe that in which thErE was no obsErvEd im- parents value education ‘a great Increased by 43.0% among Village Chiefs deal’ pact or whErE thE obsErvEd changEs 7. % of Education Officials who were lEss than thosE obsErvEd in thE believe DTMTs operate ‘effective- Increased by 1.2% ly’ (not asked of Village Chiefs) control group. Thus, onE can concludE 8. % of officials who bEliEvE com- that whilE thE C4E projEct achievEd munitiEs arE ’vEry EffectivE’ in Increased by 36.7% among Village Chiefs promoting transparEncy, per- Increased by 13% among Education Offi- positivE changE among a majority of formancE, and accountability of cials its stated indicators, there were still a primary schools 9. % of officials who bEliEvE that Increased by 30% among Village Chiefs numbEr of instancEs whErE impacts SSCs ‘play a strong rolE’ in Edu- duE to thE Education campaign wErE cation not conclusivE. 10. % of officials who feEl that par- Increased by 30% among Village Chiefs Ents arE ‘vEry awarE’ of infor- Increased by 21.8% among Education mation campaigns Officials Among thE positivE impacts obsErvEd, Increased by 30% among Village Chiefs 11.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cambodia High Frequency Phone Survey - Idpoor - Round1
    Generated by Vanny_Pong, Nov 21, 2020 03:43 Sections: 9, Sub-sections: 1, Questionnaire created by Vanny_Pong, Nov 21, 2020 03:43 Questions: 205. Last modified by Vanny_Pong, Nov 21, 2020 03:43 Questions with enabling conditions: 126 Questions with validation conditions:35 Not shared with anyone Rosters: 5 Variables: 12 Cambodia High Frequency Phone Survey - IDPoor - Round1 SURVEY IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION QUESTIONNAIRE DESCRIPTION [1] INTERVIEW INFORMATION Sub-sections: 1, Rosters: 2, Questions: 38, Static texts: 5, Variables: 7. [2B] BASIC INFORMATION RDD No sub-sections, No rosters, Questions: 18. [2C] SOCIAL ECONOMIC STATUS No sub-sections, No rosters, Questions: 3. [3] KNOWLEDGE, [4] BEHAVIOUR, [5] ACCESS, [6] EMPLOYMENT AND [8] FIES No sub-sections, No rosters, Questions: 91, Static texts: 11, Variables: 3. [7] INCOME LOSS No sub-sections, Rosters: 1, Questions: 8. [10] SHOCKS AND COPING No sub-sections, No rosters, Questions: 5, Static texts: 1. [11] SAFETY NETS No sub-sections, Rosters: 1, Questions: 11. [12] RESULT OF INTERVIEW No sub-sections, No rosters, Questions: 26, Static texts: 2. [CB] CALL BACK No sub-sections, Rosters: 1, Questions: 5, Static texts: 4, Variables: 2. APPENDIX A — CATEGORIES APPENDIX B — VARIABLES APPENDIX C — CATEGORIES FILTERS LEGEND 1 / 42 SURVEY IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION QUESTIONNAIRE DESCRIPTION Basic information Title Cambodia High Frequency Phone Survey - IDPoor - Round1 SURVEY IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION QUESTIONNAIRE DESCRIPTION 2 / 42 [1] INTERVIEW INFORMATION Zone SINGLE-SELECT zone SCOPE: IDENTIFYING
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Narrative Report 2012
    GgÁkarGnupléRBeQI Non-Timber Forest Products __________________________________________________ Annual Narrative Report for 2012 to ICCO & Kerk in Actie from NTFP Non-Timber Forest Products Organization Ban Lung, Ratanakiri Province, CAMBODIA Feb 28 2012 1 Contact addresses: Non-Timber Forest Products Organization (NTFP) Mr. Long Serey, Executive Director Email: [email protected] NTFP Main Office (Ratanakiri) NTFP Sub-office (Phnom Penh) Village 4, Sangkat Labanseak #16 Street 496 [Intersects St. 430] Banlung, Ratanakiri Province Sangkat Phsar Deom Skov CAMBODIA Khan Chamkarmorn Tel: (855) 75 974 039 Phnom Penh, CAMBODIA P.O. Box 89009 Tel: (855) 023 309 009 Web: www.ntfp-cambodia.org 2 Table of Contents Acronyms Executive summary 1. Overview of changes and challenges in the project/program context 1.1 Implications for implementation 2. Progress of the project (summary) ʹǤͳ ǯrograms and projects during 2012 2.2 Contextualized indicators and milestones 2.3 Other issues 2.4 Monitoring of progress by outputs and outcomes 3. Reflective analysis of implementation issues 3.1 Successful issue - personal and community perspectives on significant change 3.1.1 Account of Mr Bun Linn, a Kroeung ethnic 3.1.2 Account of Mr Dei Pheul, a Kawet ethnic 3.1.3 Account of Ms Seung Suth, a Tampuan ethnic 3.1.4 Account of Ms Thav Sin, a Tampuan ethnic 3.2 Unsuccessful issue (implementation partially done) 4. Lessons learned to date, challenges and solutions 4.1 Reference to KCB 4.2 Reference to youth (IYDP) 4.3 Reference to IPWP 4.4 Reference to CC 4.5 Reference to CF 4.6 Reference to CMLN 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambodian Journal of Natural History
    Cambodian Journal of Natural History Rediscovery of the Bokor horned frog Four more Cambodian bats How to monitor a marine reserve The need for community conservation areas Eleven new Masters of Science December 2013 Vol 2013 No. 2 Cambodian Journal of Natural History ISSN 2226–969X Editors Email: [email protected] • Dr Jenny C. Daltry, Senior Conservation Biologist, Fauna & Flora International. • Dr Neil M. Furey, Research Associate, Fauna & Flora International: Cambodia Programme. • Hang Chanthon, Former Vice-Rector, Royal University of Phnom Penh. • Dr Nicholas J. Souter, Project Manager, University Capacity Building Project, Fauna & Flora International: Cambodia Programme. International Editorial Board • Dr Stephen J. Browne, Fauna & Flora International, • Dr Sovanmoly Hul, Muséum National d’Histoire Singapore. Naturelle, Paris, France. • Dr Martin Fisher, Editor of Oryx—The International • Dr Andy L. Maxwell, World Wide Fund for Nature, Journal of Conservation, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Cambodia. • Dr L. Lee Grismer, La Sierra University, California, • Dr Jörg Menzel, University of Bonn, Germany. USA. • Dr Brad Pett itt , Murdoch University, Australia. • Dr Knud E. Heller, Nykøbing Falster Zoo, Denmark. • Dr Campbell O. Webb, Harvard University Herbaria, USA. Other peer reviewers for this volume • Dr Judith Eger, Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, • Berry Mulligan, Fauna & Flora International, Phnom Canada. Penh, Cambodia. • Pisuth Ek-Amnuay, Siam Insect Zoo & Museum, • Prof. Dr. Annemarie Ohler, Muséum national Chiang Mai, Thailand. d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France. • Dr James Guest, University of New South Wales, • Dr Jodi Rowley, Australian Museum, Sydney, Sydney, Australia. Australia. • Dr Kristofer M. Helgen, Smithsonian Institute, • Dr Manuel Ruedi, Natural History Museum of Washington DC, USA. Geneva, Geneva, Switz erland.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambodian-German Forestry Project Phnom Penh Cambodia
    Cambodian-German Forestry Project Phnom Penh DEPARTMENT OF Cambodia German Technical Cooperation FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE An Assessment of ongoing Community Forestry Initiatives in Cambodia - Implications for the Development of a Forestry Extension Strategy - Jürgen Fichtenau Ly Chou Beang Nup Sothea Dy Sophy Phnom Penh, November 2002 DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE #40 Norodom Boulevard X Road 144, Phnom Penh, Cambodia Tel.: +(855) 23-213937 (Team Leader ) Tel/Fax.: +(855) 23- 210 340 ( Project Office ) E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected] or [email protected] - An assessment of ongoing Community Forestry Initiatives in Cambodia – - Fichtenau, Beang, Nup, Dy - November 2002 Table of Contents Page Executive summary 4 List of abbreviations 7 Acknowledgements 9 1 Introduction 10 2 Methodology of survey 12 2.1 General considerations 12 2.2 Selection of field sites to be visited 15 2.3 GIS generated Information 16 2.3.1 Determination of Extension Categories and Locations of CF Initiatives 16 2.3.2 Determination of 10 km buffer zones 18 2.4 Strengths and weaknesses of the study 19 3 Overview of Community Forestry Initiatives 21 3.1 General figures for 57 Community Forestry Initiatives 23 3.2 Summary data for 57 Community Forestry Initiatives and their 24 significance in the context of Cambodia's forest situation 4 Findings on selected details 25 4.1 CF Initiatives and their environment 25 4.1.1 Forest abundance and population 25 4.1.2 Forest condition and development goals 27 4.1.3 Summary of findings on environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Concession Profile | Open Development Cambodia
    C A M B O D I A Concession Profile Share S K Plantation (Cambodia) PTE Company Identity Company : S K Plantation (Cambodia) PTE tt nn ee mm pp oo ll ee vv eepp DDOOLaneednn Identity [ View On Map ] Land Area : 8,000.00 hectares About Briefing s Maps Downloads Companies Laws & Reg ulations Natural Resources Census Data News Blog Links Contract Signed : May 18, 2012 Land Site Location : Bon pong,Phnum Kok,Hat Pak,Teun,Ta Lat commune, Veun Sai, Kon Mom district, Ratanakiri province Purpose of Investment : Rubber Plantation Reference(s) Sub Decree No 71.pdf (18/05/2012) This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Article sum m aries are copyrighted by their respective sources. This Open Developm ent Cam bodia (ODC) site is com piled from available docum entation and provides data without fee for general inform ational purposes only. It is not a com m ercial research service. Inform ation is posted only after a careful vetting and verification process, however ODC cannot guarantee accuracy, com pleteness or reliability from third party sources in every instance. Site users are encouraged to do additional research in support of their activities and to share the results of that research with our team at inf [email protected] to further im prove site accuracy. In deference to local Cam bodian Law, Open Developm ent Cam bodia (ODC) site users understand and agree to take full responsibility for reliance on any site inform ation provided and to hold harm less and waive any and all liability against individuals or entities associated with its developm ent, form and content for any loss, harm or dam age suffered as a result of its use.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf IWGIA Book Land Alienation 2006 EN
    Land Alienation in Indigenous Minority Communities - Ratanakiri Province, Cambodia Readers of this report are also directed toward the enclosed video documentary made on this topic in October 2005: “CRISIS – Indigenous Land Crisis in Ratanakiri”. Also relevant is the Report “Workshop to Seek Strategies to Prevent Indigenous Land Alienation” published by NGO Forum in collaboration with CARE Cambodia, 28-20 March 2005. - Final Draft- August 2006 Land Alienation in Indigenous Minority Communities - Ratanakiri Province, Cambodia Table of Contents Contents............................................................................................................................. 3 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. 4 Recommendations .............................................................................................................. 5 Executive Summary – November 2004................................................................................. 6 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 8 Methodology...................................................................................................................... 10 The Legal Situation.............................................................................................................. 11 The Situation in January 2006 ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Communities: Ethics, Values, Practice
    MAPPINGCOMMUNITIES ETHICS, VALUES, PRACTICE Edited by Jefferson Fox, Krisnawati Suryanata, and Peter Hershock ISBN # 0-86638-201-1 Published by the East-West Center Honolulu, Hawaii © East-West Center, 2005 The East-West Center is an education and research organization established by the U.S. Congress in 1960 to strengthen relations and understanding among the nations of Asia, the Pacific, and the United States. The Center promotes the development of a stable, prosperous, and peaceful Asia Pacific community through cooperative study, training, dialogue, and research. Funding for the Center comes from the U.S. government, with additional support provided by private agencies, individuals, foundations, corporations, and Asia Pacific governments. A PDF file and information about this publication can be found on the East-West Center website at www.EastWestCenter.org. For more information, please contact: Publication Sales Office East-West Center 1601 East-West Road Honolulu, HI 96848-1601 USA Telephone: (808) 944-7145 Facsimile: (808) 944-7376 Email: [email protected] Website: www.EastWestCenter.org iv TABLE OF CONTENTS vi Contributors vii Acronyms viii Acknowledgements 1 INTRODUCTION Jefferson Fox, Krisnawati Suryanata, Peter Hershock, and Albertus Hadi Pramono 11 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PARTICIPATORY MAPPING PROCESSES IN NORTHERN THAILAND Pornwilai Saipothong, Wutikorn Kojornrungrot, and David Thomas 29 EFFECTIVE MAPS FOR PLANNING SUSTAINABLE LAND USE AND LIVELIHOODS Prom Meta and Jeremy Ironside 43 UNDERSTANDING AND USING COMMUNITY MAPS AMONG INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES IN RATANAKIRI PROVINCE, CAMBODIA Klot Sarem, Jeremy Ironside, and Georgia Van Rooijen 57 EMPOWERING COMMUNITIES THROUGH MAPPING Zheng Baohua 73 DEVELOPMENT OF RURAL COMMUNITY CAPACITY THROUGH SPATIAL INFORMATION TECHNOLGY Yvonne Everett and Phil Towle 87 COMMUNITY-BASED MAPPING Mark Bujang 97 INSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF COUNTER-MAPPING TO INDONESIAN NGO’s Albertus Hadi Pramono 107 BUILDING LOCAL CAPACITY IN USING SIT FOR NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN EAST SUMBA, INDONESIA Martin Hardiono, H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Master Plan Study on Rural Electrification by Renewable Energy in the Kingdom of Cambodia
    No. Ministry of Industry, Mines and Energy in the Kingdom of Cambodia THE MASTER PLAN STUDY ON RURAL ELECTRIFICATION BY RENEWABLE ENERGY IN THE KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA FINAL REPORT VOLUME 5: APPENDICES June 2006 Japan International Cooperation Agency NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD., Tokyo ED JR KRI INTERNATIONAL CORP., Tokyo 06-082 Japan International Ministry of Industry, Mines and Cooperation Agency Energy in the Kingdom of Cambodia THE MASTER PLAN STUDY ON RURAL ELECTRIFICATION BY RENEWABLE ENERGY IN THE KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA FINAL REPORT VOLUME 5 : APPENDICES June 2006 NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD., Tokyo KRI INTERNATIONAL CORP., Tokyo Final Report (Appendices) Abbreviations Abbreviations Abbreviation Description ADB Asian Development Bank Ah Ampere hour ASEAN Association of South East Asian Nations ATP Ability to Pay BCS Battery Charging Station CBO Community Based Organization CDC Council of Development for Cambodia CDM Clean Development Mechanism CEC Community Electricities Cambodia CF Community Forestry CFR Complementary Function to REF CIDA Canadian International Development Agency DAC Development Assistance Committee DIME Department of Industry, Mines and Energy DNA Designated National Authority EAC Electricity Authority of Cambodia EdC Electricite du Cambodge EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EIRR Economic Internal Rate of Return ESA Energy Service Agent ESCO Energy Service Company EU European Union FIRR Financial Internal Rate of Return FS Feasibility Study GDP Gross Domestic Product GEF Global Environment Facility GHG Greenhouse Gas GIS Geographic
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Evaluation of the Multilingual Education National
    INDEPENDENT EVALUATION OF THE MULTILINGUAL EDUCATION NATIONAL ACTION PLAN IN CAMBODIA ANNEXES – VOLUME II July 2018 – February 2019 Cambodia EVALUATION REPORT MAY 2019 Photo: Indigenous children mapping their experiences in multilingual education Photo Credit ©UNICEF Cambodia/2018/Jessica Ball EVALUATION REPORT Independent Evaluation of the Multilingual Education National Action Plan in Cambodia July 2018 – February 2019 Cambodia Authors: Jessica Ball and Mariam Smith, with support from Srom Bunthy, Srey Mao, Ka Nom, Thuk Bun, Cheun Kham Phin, Chab A and Pim Kheav Submitted to UNICEF Cambodia Country Office on 18 February 2019. Edited by Deirdre Smith in April-May 2019. MAY 2019 Independent Evaluation of the Multilingual Education National Action Plan in Cambodia INDEPENDENT EVALUATION OF THE MULTILINGUAL EDUCATION NATIONAL ACTION PLAN IN CAMBODIA (Volume II) © United Nations Children’s Fund, Phnom Penh, 2019 United Nations Children’s Fund P.O. Box 176 Phnom Penh, Cambodia 12201 [email protected] May 2019 The United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) in Cambodia produces and publishes evaluation reports to fulfil a corporate commitment to transparency. These reports are designed to stimulate the free exchange of ideas among those interested in the study topic and to assure those supporting UNICEF’s work that it rigorously examines its strategies, results and overall effectiveness. The Evaluation of the Multilingual Education National Action Plan in Cambodia was prepared by Jessica Ball and Mariam Smith. Deirdre Smith edited the report. The evaluation was commissioned by UNICEF Cambodia on behalf of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport. It was managed by a team led by Erica Mattellone (Evaluation Specialist, UNICEF) with support provided by Phaloeuk Kong and Saky Lim (Monitoring and Evaluation Officers, UNICEF), Nhonh Sophea (Education Specialist, UNICEF), Katheryn Bennett (Chief, Education, UNICEF), Tyler Henry (UNICEF Intern) and Elizabeth Fisher (Research and Evaluation Associate, UNICEF).
    [Show full text]
  • MTF - Facility (FINAL)
    This PDF generated by angkor, 11/13/2017 3:55:05 AM Sections: 4, Sub-sections: 7, Questionnaire created by angkor, 3/23/2017 7:59:26 AM Questions: 148. Last modified by angkor, 6/12/2017 8:57:40 AM Questions with enabling conditions: 74 Questions with validation conditions: 24 Not shared with anyone Rosters: 2 Variables: 0 WB - MTF - Facility (FINAL) A. INTERVIEW IDENTIFICATION No sub-sections, No rosters, Questions: 8. INFORMED CONSENT No sub-sections, No rosters, Questions: 2, Static texts: 1. B. FACILITY Sub-sections: 7, Rosters: 2, Questions: 127. C. CONTACT DETAILS No sub-sections, No rosters, Questions: 11. APPENDIX A — OPTIONS APPENDIX B — OPTION FILTERS LEGEND 1 / 22 A. INTERVIEW IDENTIFICATION SURVEY_ID TEXT SURVEYID SCOPE: IDENTIFYING A1 - Province SINGLE-SELECT A1 01 Banteay Meanchey 02 Battambang 03 Kampong Cham 04 Kampong Chhnang 05 Kampong Speu 06 Kampong Thom 07 Kampot 08 Kandal 09 Kep 10 Koh Kong 11 Kracheh 12 Mondul Kiri 13 Otdar Meanchey 14 Pailin 15 Phnom Penh 16 Preah Sihanouk And 9 other [1] A3 - District SINGLE-SELECT: CASCADING A3 001 Malai 002 Mongkol Borei 003 Ou Chrov 004 Paoy Paet 005 Phnum Srok 006 Serei Saophoan 007 Svay Chek 008 Thma Puok 009 Banan 010 Battambang 011 Bavel 012 Koas Krala 013 Moung Ruessei 014 Phnum Proek 015 Rotonak Mondol 016 Sampov Lun And 125 other [2] A5 - Commune SINGLE-SELECT: CASCADING A5 001 Ta Kong 002 Kouk Ballangk 003 Ruessei Kraok 004 Changha 005 Paoy Paet 006 Phsar Kandal 007 Ponley 008 Srah Chik 009 Ou Ambel 010 Preah Ponlea 011 Phkoam 012 Phum Thmei 013 Ta Kream 014 Chamkar Samraong 015 Kdol Doun Teav A.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Indigenous Peoples in Cambodia
    UNITED NATIONS COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION (76TH SESSION 2010) Submitted by Indigenous People NGO Network (IPNN) Coordinated by NGO Forum on Cambodia In cooperation with Asian Indigenous Peoples Pact (AIPP) February 2010 UNITED NATIONS COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION (76TH SESSION 2010) THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN CAMBODIA Submitted by Indigenous People NGO Network (IPNN) Coordinated by NGO Forum on Cambodia In cooperation with Asian Indigenous Peoples Pact (AIPP) Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................2 2 INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN CAMBODIA ..........................................................................................2 3 OVERALL LEGAL FRAMEWORK ......................................................................................................3 4 EDUCATION ...........................................................................................................................................4 5 NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT...........................................................................................4 5.1 Forest Issues ...........................................................................................................................................5ry 5.2 Protected Areas..........................................................................................................................................6 5.3 LAND...............................................................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Farmers' Perceptions of Current Status and Constraints to Soybean Production in Ratanakiri Provinceof Cambodia
    sustainability Article Overview of Farmers’ Perceptions of Current Status and Constraints to Soybean Production in Ratanakiri Province of Cambodia Raby Nget 1,2,*, Edna A. Aguilar 2, Pompe C. Sta. Cruz 2, Consorcia E. Reaño 2, Pearl B. Sanchez 3, Manuel R. Reyes 4 and P. V. Vara Prasad 4 1 Agronomy Department, Royal University of Agriculture, Dangkor District, Phnom Penh P.O. Box 2696, Cambodia 2 Institute of Crop Science, College of Agriculture and Food Science, University of the Philippines Los Baños, Laguna 4031, Philippines; [email protected] (E.A.A.); [email protected] (P.C.S.C.); [email protected] (C.E.R.) 3 Agricultural Systems Institute, College of Agriculture and Food Science, University of the Philippines Los Baños, Laguna 4031, Philippines; [email protected] 4 Sustainable Intensification Innovation Lab, Department of Agronomy, Kansa State University, Manhattan, Kansas, KS 66056, USA; [email protected] (M.R.R.); [email protected] (P.V.V.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +855-92-115-536 Abstract: A study was undertaken in Koun Mom district of Ratanakiri province in Cambodia to analyze the perceptions of the current status and constraints to soybean production and identify solutions to improve production and the management practices. Primary data were collected by Citation: Nget, R.; Aguilar, E.A.; personal interviews at field level of 130 producers. Most respondents were in the medium age Cruz, P.C.S.; Reaño, C.E.; Sanchez, category, Grade 4 education, with an average land holding of 2.96 ha and annual income of KHR P.B.; Reyes, M.R.; Prasad, P.V.V.
    [Show full text]