New Route Extension of KY 645 2006 from US 23 to Interstate 64 Lawrence, Elliott, Rowan and Carter Counties Six-Year Highway Plan, Item No

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New Route Extension of KY 645 2006 from US 23 to Interstate 64 Lawrence, Elliott, Rowan and Carter Counties Six-Year Highway Plan, Item No 645 MAR New Route Extension of KY 645 2006 From US 23 to Interstate 64 Lawrence, Elliott, Rowan and Carter Counties Six-Year Highway Plan, Item No. 12-115.00 other interested parties, and the public; identify The Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC) has known issues, concerns, and constraints, undertaken this regional corridor study to consider including social, traffic, environmental, and the extension of KY 645 from US 23 in Ulysses to geotechnical considerations; define project goals; some location along Interstate 64 between establish the beginning and ending points of the Morehead and the Industrial Parkway (Exit 179) in project; develop and evaluate project alternatives Carter County. Portions of this new highway could based on project goals; and make pass through parts of Lawrence, Elliott, Rowan and recommendations. Carter Counties, providing improved access to employment centers, isolated communities, tourism This project was identified in the KYTC’s FY sites, and other regional corridors. Though a new 2000-2006 Six Year Highway Plan as Item No. route would not physically impact Martin County, it 12-115.00. Subsequent phases of project could also improve the mobility of Martin County development, including Design, Right-of-Way residents to points west. Acquisition, Utility Relocation, and Construction, are not scheduled in the most recent legislatively The purpose of this study was to listen to and share approved Kentucky Six-Year Highway Plan FY information with local officials, government agencies, 2005-2010. The project ends somewhere along I-64 between Morehead and the Industrial Parkway (KY 67) The project begins at KY 645 in Lawrence County EXISTING CONDITIONS PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED Characteristics of KY 645 and other major highways Through the collection of study area data and the in the study area were analyzed as part of this study, public involvement process, the need for an including data and/or information on transportation improved highway network has been identified in systems, geometric characteristics, bridges, traffic each of the four study area counties. The goals listed conditions, crash history, adequacy ratings, below are based on a compilation of input from environmental features, geotechnical characteristics highway officials, local government agencies, and planned highway improvements. Consideration interest groups, members of the general public, the of these factors for existing roadways helps to Citizens’ Advisory Team (CAT) and the project team. evaluate the need for improved highways in the area. These goals address accessibility, economic benefit, connectivity, and operational conditions: The existing KY 645 corridor is a four-lane Develop a new or improved highway that provides an roadway through moun- improved connection to I-64, while also addressing tainous terrain with 12- the following transportation service objectives: foot lanes and 10-foot • Enhances regional accessibility and mobility shoulders. The speed • Improves access to isolated communities and limit is 55 miles per hour populations (mph) along the entire • Serves as an interstate connector from the I-73/74 length of the route. corridor near Kermit, West Virginia to I-64 This roadway is traveled Develop a highway corridor that will serve the most by coal trucks and other heavy vehicles, as well as traffic, while also meeting the following traffic-related the general public. The existing traffic volume along objectives: KY 645 in the study area is about 5,860 vehicles per • Diverts traffic from US 23 to reduce congestion on day (vpd), with about 37.1% trucks. that route All of KY 645 in Lawrence County operates at • Optimizes and/or addresses future traffic flow on acceptable levels; however, several other roadways regional highways within the study area operate at unacceptable levels, • Provides travel time savings in the region, including portions of US 60, KY 1, KY 7 and KY 32. including the improvement of emergency By the year 2025, additional segments of area response times roadways are expected to decrease in service to Develop a corridor that considers all study area unacceptable levels, including most (95-100%) of KY interests, including socioeconomic, education, 7 in Elliott and Carter Counties, 73% of US 60 in tourism, and the environment, while giving Rowan County, and 43% of US 60 in Carter County. consideration to the following objectives: While no “high crash segments” or “high crash spots” • Assists in promoting economic growth and were identified along KY 645 in Lawrence County, a development in areas that have low-income number of these locations were identified along populations portions of I-64, US 60, KY 1, KY 7, KY 32 and other • Increases employment opportunities and gives routes. special consideration to areas with high unemployment A preliminary environmental footprint was also • Provides access to existing employment centers, developed for the KY 645 project area. This analysis including area industrial parks identified potential issues and concerns within and • Expands access to social services such as surrounding the defined project area. The following education and health care special features are important to this project and were • Provides improved access to key tourist highlighted on the environmental footprint: Daniel destinations (examples include Grayson Lake, Boone National Forest; Sheltowee Trace Trail; Yatesville Lake and the new golf course in Carter Grayson Lake State Park; Grayson Lake Wildlife County) Management Area; Yatesville Lake State Park; • Avoids or minimizes impacts to environmentally Yatesville Lake Wildlife Management Area; Laurel sensitive areas (i.e., the Daniel Boone National Creek; Caney Creek; Abandoned Mines; Dry and Forest, Laurel Creek, and Caney Creek) Abandoned Wells; and Numerous oil wells, gas wells, • Fits the natural surroundings and considers injection wells, water wells, and quarries. context-sensitive design ALTERNATIVES DEVELOPMENT recommended that Corridors 1, 3, 6, 7, and 8 Throughout the course of this study, the local would not move forward and that Corridors 2, 4, stakeholders and agency representatives were 5, and 9, as shown below, and the no-build given opportunities to provide input for the study and option, would be advanced for further to help develop the recommendations. There were consideration in the study process. two major rounds of coordination activities, including As part of the further evaluation process, Project Team Meetings, Local Elected Officials environmental and geotechnical overviews were Meetings, Local Agencies Meetings, Citizens conducted on the four corridors. The overviews Advisory Team (CAT) Meetings, Public Involvement provided additional detail within a more defined Meetings, Public Comment Surveys, and Resource area. A Level 2 Screening was also conducted, Agency Coordination. including: consideration of more detailed cost The first round of coordination sought to identify estimates; estimates of travel savings; cultural local needs, concerns and ideas for the project. and historic occurrences near the corridors; Map drawing exercises allowed the public to identify environmental resources within the corridor locations to avoid and/or access with a new route boundaries, such as water resources, natural or through the region. With input from the public, the forested areas, wetlands, floodplains, sensitive CAT and the project team, a total of nine (9) habitats, monitored sites, soil types, mines, preliminary corridors and the no-build option were cemeteries, and others; and geotechnical issues. developed for consideration, as shown in the map A second round of coordination gave local below. citizens, public officials and representatives of A Level 1 Screening of these corridors included government resource agencies the opportunity to consideration of the preliminary project goals and review the four corridors, the no-build option, and objectives, potential environmental and community Level 2 Screening. Of the 664 survey responses, impacts, planning level cost estimates, public input, 369 ranked Corridor 5 as the most preferred, and transportation and traffic issues. Based on the followed by Corridor 2 with 244 votes. The no- Level 1 Screening of the corridors, the Project Team build option was ranked as the least preferred. 8 5 6 7 9 3 4 1 2 RECOMMENDATIONS Ultimately, the Project Team recommended that two After carefully reviewing all the findings of the study, (2) alternatives be advanced for further consideration the Project Team recommended that Corridors 4 and in the next phase of project development: Corridors 2 9 should not move forward for further consideration. and 5. The Project Team also identified priority The Project Team also recognized the potential sections for Corridors 2 and 5, beginning at the benefits of Corridors 2 and 5 as two real needs in the existing terminus of KY 645 at US 23 and moving project area, and had a difficult time selecting one northwest, as shown in the map below. Estimated corridor over the other. costs for completion of the recommended corridors is Corridor 2 has a slight advantage in regional shown by section below, with a total of $413.1 million accessibility and mobility; will likely serve more traffic for Corridor 2 and about $363.5 million for Corridor 5. in the future and provides an improved route for CONTACT INFORMATION existing KY 32; offers better travel time savings; provides access to existing employment centers, Additional information regarding the KY 645
Recommended publications
  • Purpose and Need
    United States Department of Agriculture Cave Run Non-Motorized Forest Service Trails Initiative Southern Region November 2009 Scoping Document Cumberland Ranger District, Daniel Boone National Forest Bath, Rowan and Menifee Counties, Kentucky For Information Contact: Patty Beyer USDA Forest Service 115 South Lakeshore Drive, Suite E Marquette, MI 49855 (906) 226-1499 Or Tim Eling USDA Forest Service Daniel Boone National Forest 3451 Sky Bridge Road Stanton, KY 40380 (606) 663-0576 ext 101 Cave Run Non-Motorized Trails Initiative Scoping Document The Forest Service decision-making process provides Where is this opportunities for interested parties to give their ideas and opinions project in the about resource management proposals. This input is important in Forest Service helping the Forest Service to identify resource needs, which will shape the alternatives evaluated and lead to the formation of a project planning decision. The following explains the basic steps used in the project process? planning process, and where the attached proposal is in that process. Step One–Need for a project. The Forest Service or some other entity may identify the need for a project. YOU may bring the need for a project to the attention of the Forest Service. Step Two–Develop project proposal. The Forest Service or a project proponent develops detailed, site-specific proposal. YOU may be proponent who develops proposal or YOU can share input and ideas. Step Three–Scoping (public input). The Forest Service solicits public input on the site-specific proposal to define the scope of environmental analysis and range of alternatives to be considered. YOU provide site-specific input on the proposal including recommendations to protect the environment and improve the activities proposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Determining Rider Behaviors and Valuing Site Amenities That Contribute to Repeat Visits
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge University of Kentucky Master's Theses Graduate School 2008 AN ANALYSIS OF KENTUCKY EQUESTRIAN TRAIL RIDERS: DETERMINING RIDER BEHAVIORS AND VALUING SITE AMENITIES THAT CONTRIBUTE TO REPEAT VISITS Katharine Auchter University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Auchter, Katharine, "AN ANALYSIS OF KENTUCKY EQUESTRIAN TRAIL RIDERS: DETERMINING RIDER BEHAVIORS AND VALUING SITE AMENITIES THAT CONTRIBUTE TO REPEAT VISITS" (2008). University of Kentucky Master's Theses. 572. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/gradschool_theses/572 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Kentucky Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT OF THESIS AN ANALYSIS OF KENTUCKY EQUESTRIAN TRAIL RIDERS: DETERMINING RIDER BEHAVIORS AND VALUING SITE AMENITIES THAT CONTRIBUTE TO REPEAT VISITS The purpose of this travel cost study is to determine how rider behaviors and site characteristics influence repeat visits for equestrian trail riding in Kentucky. Primary data was collected via a survey developed and administered to trail riders in person and online. The average surveyed trail rider tends to be female, about 46 years old, with some higher education, and an annual household income of $65,000. She makes 11 trips to a specified site per year, 8 of which are daytrips, usually in the fall, and traveling 132 miles round trip. From other information gathered, an index of trail characteristics was developed to identify positive attributes of trails.
    [Show full text]
  • Trail Riding Fun Sheet
    Test your Trail Knowledge 1. Leave No Trace is a. A way to copy artwork without making lines b. A way to use trails without impacting the environment c. A way to use trails and keep others off 2. Wearing a helmet while riding will a. Make your head hot b. Shade your eyes c. Help protect your head 3. When you ride a horse you should wear a. A helmet, long pants, and close toe shoes with a good heel b. Sunglasses, shorts, and flip flops c. Bracelets, long pants, and flip flops 4. At Mammoth Cave National Park you can a. Ride your horse in the caves b. Ride your horse c. Only hike 5. The Sheltowee Trace trail is named for a. Danielle Davis b. Daniel Boyd c. Daniel Boone 6. Land Between the Lakes is Sheltowee is a Native a. A manmade peninsula American word that b. A natural peninsula means “big turtle”. c. An island Unscramble These KY State Parks that Offer Guided Trail Rides YK ADM ILGVLAE_______ ________ ___________ KLEA UBRADCMELN___________ ________________ YTUCKNEK SEHOR KPRA _______________ _______________ _____________ RRBEAN VRIER AEKL__________ ____________ ______________ MRADUBLNCE ALSFL________________ ________________ RECTRA VSCEA_______________ _______________ BARREN RIVER LAKE CUMBERLAND FALLS LAKE CUMBERLAND CARTER CAVES KY DAM VILLAGE KENTUCKY HORSE PARK © 2010 Kentucky Horse Council, Inc. www.kentuckyhorse.org Content in part by Lori Frey Find the Hidden Trail Ride Destinations K Y D C E V A C H T O M M A M G R T B A R R E N F O R K T R R R U R T R L R I D E S O M E E A E H A E T L E S O C K E C E K I E BARREN FORK P I
    [Show full text]
  • Abandoned Railroad Corridors in Kentucky
    KTC-03-31/MSC1-01-1F Abandoned Railroad Corridors in Kentucky: An Inventory and Assessment Kentucky Department for Local Government June 2003 Prepared by the Kentucky Transportation Center 1. Report No. 12. Government Accession 3. Recipients catalog no KTC-03-31/MSC 1-0 1-1F No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date June 2003 Abandoned Railroad Corridors in Kentucky: An Inventory and Assessment 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Lisa Rainey Brownell KTC-03-31/MSC1-01-1F Kentucky Transportation Center 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) 9. Performing Organization Name and Address Kentucky Transportation Center 11. Contract or Grant No. University of Kentucky Oliver H. Raymond Building Lexington. KY 40506-0281 12. Sponsoring Agency Code 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Department for Local Governments Final 1024 Capital Center Dr. Ste. 340 Frankfort, KY 40601 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract This report provides an inventory of Kentucky's abandoned rail lines and a detailed assessment to highlight the lines that may be the most suitable for future trail use. A secondary purpose of the report was to inventory historic railroad structures. Over 125 different abandoned rail lines were identified, mapped using GIS technology, and assessed for their current use and condition. These abandoned rights of way exist in all regions of the state, in urban and rural areas. 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement Abandoned Railroads, Rails to Trails Unlimited 19. Security Classif. (of this report) 120. Security Classif. (of this page) 121. No. of Pages 122.
    [Show full text]
  • Download 1 File
    JACKSOTHURSDAY, APRIL 5, 2012 N COUNTY EasterSU Egg NHunt OLUME UMBER V 85, N 14 - USPS 271940 This Saturday PUBLISHED WEEKLY SINCE 1926 11 am MCKEE, KY - 50 CENTS Bond Memorial Park Sponsored by JC Fair Board County Officials Answer Questions at Sand Gap McKee Looks to Become a “Trail Town” Jerry Sparks Town Hall Meeting Senior Reporter Jerry Sparks In 2011, the Kentucky Office of Tourism began to look at Senior Reporter the towns along the Sheltowee Trace and the Daniel Boone National Forest (DBNF) as potential locations as “Trail Jackson County officials (County Judge Executive Wil- Towns” where they could potentially gain some economic liam O Smith, Sheriff Denny Peyman, and Tourism Com- benefits from visits by users of the DBNF. mittee Chairman Gene Gatts) met with citizens of Sand Gap The Sheltowee Trace Association (STA) worked with KY last week (Thursday, March 30th, 2012) to discuss concerns Tourism to encourage the town of McKee along with More- of the residents in the area. head, Frenchburg, Livingston, London-Corbin, and Stearns- Judge Smith was asked about the status of the magis- Whitley City, to look at the potential by participating in the trate position responsible for representing the citizens in state developed Trail Town Assessment”. magistrate district #3. On February 29th, 2012 District #3 The STA has made visits to these communities with the The Turtle marks the Sheltowee Trace Trail. Magistrate Doug Rose, 46, pled guilty in the Eastern Dis- leadership of the Office of Tourism to share experiences and trict London US Court to charges of assaulting / resisting/ encourage local and county leadership to see if there is some to get out and enjoy the trails.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2021 Newsletter
    FOTT a 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation THE CUMBERLAND TRAILHEAD The voice of the Friends of the Trails Spring 2021 Cumberland County, TN Fairfield Glade Expansion Means Trail Reroutes Submitted by Jerry Brown The new development on Chestnut Ridge in Fairfield North required a reroute of the Canyon Trail. Because of advance notice, that reroute was accomplished by the FG Trails Committee and volunteer trail workers well before the bulldozers destroyed the old trail. Now, Phase 2 of the new housing development is in the planning stages, which will again require a preemptive effort to keep trails open once the construction begins. The new development will be all around the water tower. It will necessitate the reroute of a portion of the Good Samaritan Trail, the Rotherham Trail, and the Canyon Trail. The junction where these three trails currently meet will be lost and the plan is to reroute the trails so that the new intersection will be at Yoga Rock. Other casualties of the new development will be the water tower parking, the portion of the Yellow Loop along the road to the water tower, and the trail from the water tower down to the current junction. The plan is to reroute the Yellow Loop alongside Good Samaritan property just west of the back entrance road to Good Samaritan and connect to the Good Samaritan Trail south of the new development. The loss of the water tower parking will be resolved by expanding the Catoosa North parking area. The parking area and trail access hikers now use at the water tower in Fairfield North will no longer be available once The reroutes have already been scouted and flagged and construction of Phase 2 of the new housing development begins.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel Boone National Forest
    Daniel Boone National Forest From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Daniel Boone National Forest IUCN category VI (protected area with sustainable use of natural resources) View from the Tater Knob in the Daniel Boone National Forest Location Kentucky, USA Nearest city Winchester, Kentucky 37°17′17″N 83°52′31″W37.28806°N 83.87528°WCoordinates: Coordinates 37°17′17″N 83°52′31″W37.28806°N 83.87528°W 2,100,000 acres (8,500 km2) (proclamation boundary); Area 706,000 acres (2,860 km2) (Forest Service) Established 23 February 1937[1] Visitors 2,507,000 (in 2004) Governing body U.S. Forest Service Official website Daniel Boone National Forest is the only national forest completely within the boundary of Kentucky. Established in 1937, it was originally named the Cumberland National Forest, after the core region called the Cumberland Purchase Unit. About 2,100,000 acres (8,500 km2) are contained within its current proclamation boundary, of which 706,000 acres (2,860 km2) are owned and managed by the United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service (as of April 2006), up from around 620,000 acres (2,500 km2) in the early to mid-1990s. The forest was named after Daniel Boone, a frontiersman and explorer in the late 18th century who contributed greatly to the exploration and settlement of Kentucky. Contents [hide] • 1 Notable features • 2 History • 3 Recent controversies • 4 Counties • 5 References • 6 Further reading • 7 External links Daniel Boone National Forest surrounds or contains a variety of popular and notable features, including: • One of the world's largest concentrations of caves.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Name (Heading 1)
    FOREST SUPERVISOR’S CLOSURE ORDERS RECREATION AND VISUALS RESOURCE REPORT PREPARED BY: Mark Engler Acting Recreation Program Manager with Matt Able Acting Recreation Program Manager Daniel Boone National Forest February 24, 2015 Updated April 20, 2015 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Forest Supervisor’s Closure Orders Recreation and Visual Resources Report Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Proposed Action and Alternatives .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Michael J Bradley
    Vitae – Michael Bradley Michael J Bradley Education Ph.D. Oklahoma State University M.S. Western Illinois University B.S. Oklahoma State University Professional Experience & Appointments Associate Professor Teach in the undergraduate curricula for the Department Arkansas Tech University of Parks, Recreation, & Hospitality Aug 2020-Current Serve in various positions in the department, college, and university Serve in various professional service positions at local, state, regional, and national levels Associate Professor & Taught in the undergraduate and graduate curricula for Graduate Coordinator the Department of Recreation and Park Eastern Kentucky University Administration Aug 2012-Jul 2020 Principle investigator for various recreation & tourism projects at that national, state, and local levels for the Center for Economic Development, Entrepreneurship, & Technology Served in various positions in the department, college, and university. Served in various professional service positions at local, state, regional, and national levels Owner Developed content and managed branding, marketing, Dreaming Creek Brewery and social media Aug 2016-Apr 2020 Managed finances for two taprooms, statewide distribution, and operations Trained and scheduled taproom and event employees Field Research Coordinator Managed GIS site teams and helped develop park master Oklahoma State University plans for Oklahoma State Parks master plan & GIS Aug 2008-Jul2012 mapping project Taught in the undergraduate curricula for the Recreation Management and Therapeutic
    [Show full text]
  • Sheltowee Trace Trail
    North Terminus Sheltowee Trace National Recreation Trail 9.9 377 140 799 To 143 Ashland Triplet 4.5 144 64 377 64 60 799 174 977 Haldeman To 6.1 As a visitor to the Sheltowee Trace National Recreation Trail, feel settlement by colonial Europeans moving west. Campsites, old Flemingsburg 32 free to explore and discover the natural attractions along the buildings, and historic farmsteads still tell their stories. 5.9 To Sandy Hook 32 trail. Because of the mixed land ownership when the trail was These fragile archaeological resources are unmistakable evidence 60 Morehead Morehead established, the trail travels along roads as well as in the woods. of earlier lives - a common inheritance from past generations To 64 District Lexington Office 6.8 It touches significant historic trails like the Wilderness Road and with whom we have shared this land. Disturbing and vandalizing 801 519 Farmers 60 4.8 Warrior's Path, often following them for a short distance. these sites attacks the cultural heritage of the Native Americans. 826 1274 NOTE: This map is intended to provide general recreation locations These sites are the burial grounds, homes and sacred places of Salt Lick 801 CAVE RUN LAKE 519 36 White 9.6 Twin and is not an official transportation or trail map. For more detailed their ancestors, and form a part of the cultural heritage of all Olympia Sulphur Knobs 211 Horse Camp Pioneer Zilpo road maps, topographical maps, or recreation opportunity Americans. Destroying or defacing these places is like someone Weapons 36 Clear 129 Area Creek 1274 guides, please contact one of the addresses on the back of this vandalizing your home, church or cemetery.
    [Show full text]
  • America's National Forests
    COMPLIMENTARY $3.95 2019/2020 YOUR COMPLETE GUIDE TO THE PARKS AMERICA’S NATIONAL FORESTS ACTIVITIES • SIGHTSEEING • DINING • LODGING TRAILS • HISTORY • MAPS • MORE OFFICIAL PARTNERS AMNF_CVR1_2019_final.indd 1 5/6/19 11:40 AM T:5.375” S:4.75” PRESERVATION WELCOME S:7.375” T:8.375” SPECTACULAR VISTAS, ABUNDANT WILDLIFE, IMPORTANT SO TASTY EVERYONE WILL WANT A BITE. RESOURCES, AND HIGH QUALITY RECREATION. Our National Forests and Grasslands are truly “The People’s Lands.” These spectacular 193 million acres stretch from Alaska’s snow-capped peaks to Florida’s lush longleaf pine forests. Red rock deserts, sprawling grasslands, hardwood forests, and fascinating his- tory are all yours to explore and discover when you visit our National Forests and Grasslands. But these forests are about more than just scenic vistas and historic sites. Our forests provide water to millions of Americans in thousands of communities, harbor diverse wildlife, and provide resources for our nation. From clean air to clean water and from scenic drives to the thrill of wilderness solitude, our national forests offer an abundance of recreation opportunities, eco- system services, and a lifetime’s worth of exploration. The National Forest Foundation works to steward these incredible landscapes and en- gage Americans in their care. We do this through innovative grant programs, tree-planting projects, long-term investments in particular landscapes, and by bringing diverse groups to- gether. We also share the stories of our national forests and highlight the values these trea- sured public lands provide. We are proud to work with the American Park Network on this guide that lists just some of the incredible opportunities our National Forests and Grasslands offer.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Back Page
    Support your local 12. Bath County Sports Complex • Located on Well Rd. approximately ½ mile off PLACES TO SHOP! Residency • Director - Robert Barker - 859.473.0552 • Coordinator - Robert Gaunce- of US- 60 near I-64 exit #123 • This modern Sports venue includes facilities for 859.340.2572 E9 businesses! baseball, softball and soccer. The facility also includes bleacher seating, concession 25. Ardery’s Antiques & Collectibles • 627 Main St. • Paris, KY • 859-987-8180 stand, picnic tables, kids playground and restrooms. J10 • Over 7,000 sq ft of antiques, collectibles and home furnishings in a renovated J. J. 36. The Bourbon Drive-in • US 68 at Jackstown Road • Paris, KY• 859-987-2935 Newberry’s five & dime store from 1939. Featuring furniture, prints, paintings, • Family operated since 1955. Double feature “first run” family friendly films from BATH COUNTY 13. Cave Run Lake • Considered one of the most scenic lakes in the state of lighting, glassware, vintage costume jewelry and much more early Spring until late Fall. Popcorn, candy, cheese & chili dogs, chicken fingers, fish Kentucky • Cave Run is nestled in the rolling hills along Bath Counties southeast • Visit us on Facebook or www.arderysantiques.com B10 sandwiches, fried pick spears, onion petals, cheese cubes, nachos, ice cream, PLACES TO EAT!!! border • The 8,270 acre lake and its surrounding recreation areas are popular for pretzels, BBQ sandwiches, kids meals, corn dogs and funnel cakes • Facebook or boating, fishing, hiking, hunting and wildlife viewing. N11 26. CWF Products • 716 Main Street • Paris, KY• 859-333-0684 • For 15 years www.thebourbondrivein.com. D9 1.
    [Show full text]