The Publishing of a Poet: an Empirical Examination of the Social Characteristics of Canadian Poets As Revealed in Small Press Literary Magazines
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The Publishing of a Poet: An Empirical Examination of the Social Characteristics of Canadian Poets as Revealed in Small Press Literary Magazines by Diane Monique Barlee B.A., University of Victoria, 2008 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of Sociology ! Diane Monique Barlee, 2011 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Supervisory Committee The Publishing of a Poet: An Empirical Examination of the Social Characteristics of Canadian Poets as Revealed in Small Press Literary Magazines by Diane Monique Barlee B.A., University of Victoria, 2008 Supervisory Committee Dr. Richard Ogmundson (Department of Sociology) Supervisor Dr. Peyman Vehabzadeh (Department of Sociology) Departmental Member Dr. Iain Macleod Higgins (Department of English) Outside Member iii Abstract Supervisory Committee Dr. Richard Ogmundson (Department of Sociology) Supervisor Dr. Peyman Vehabzadeh (Department of Sociology) Departmental Member Dr. Iain Macleod Higgins (Department of English) Outside Member This thesis is an exploratory examination of the social characteristics of 139 poets featured in a selection of five small press Canadian literary journals. The investigation charts and analyzes the demographics of 64 poets who were published in 1967, and 75 poets who were published in four small press literary magazines in 2010. The 2010 magazines were purposely sampled as representatives of specific geographical areas in Canada (i.e., the West Coast, the Prairies, Central Canada, and the East Coast). The results indicate that in 1967 female poets were less likely to be published; however, 43 years later, this bias has been rectified. Another notable difference between the two groups of poets is that in 1967 ethnic minorities were more likely to be published. Educational achievement was an important factor for both the 1967 and 2010 poets, as was location, occupation and editorial duties. iv Table of Contents Supervisory Committee.......................................................................................................ii! Abstract ............................................................................................................................. iii! Table of Contents ...............................................................................................................iv! List of Tables......................................................................................................................vi! List of Figures ...................................................................................................................vii! Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................... viii! Chapter 1. Introduction........................................................................................................1! 1.1 Rationale for this Thesis............................................................................................2! 1.2 Research Questions ...................................................................................................2! 1.3 Research Approach....................................................................................................2! 1.4 Research Methods .....................................................................................................3! 1.5 Structure of this Thesis..............................................................................................7! Chapter 2. Literature Review ............................................................................................10! 2.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................10! 2.2 Early Contributors ...................................................................................................10! 2.3 The Frankfurt School ..............................................................................................11! 2.4 Developments in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s ........................................................12! 2.5 Current Status..........................................................................................................14! 2.6 Contributions from Outside of the Field .................................................................17! Chapter 3. Canadian Literature ........................................................................................22! 3.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................22! 3.2 An Examination of the Data....................................................................................22! 3.3 A Summary of the Findings ....................................................................................25! Chapter 4. The Griffin Poetry Prize ..................................................................................26! 4.1 The Griffin Poetry Prize..........................................................................................26! 4.2 An Examination of the Data....................................................................................28! Chapter 5. The Malahat Review ........................................................................................30! 5.1 The Malahat Review................................................................................................30! 5.2 An Examination of the Data....................................................................................30! 5.3 A Summary of the Findings ....................................................................................33! 5.4 Subsequent Analysis ...............................................................................................34! Chapter 6. Prairie Fire......................................................................................................36! 6.1 Prairie Fire .............................................................................................................36! 6.2 An Examination of the Data....................................................................................36! 6.3 A Summary of the Findings ....................................................................................38! Chapter 7. Arc Poetry Magazine .......................................................................................40! 7.1 Arc ...........................................................................................................................40! 7.2 An Examination of the Data....................................................................................40! 7.3 A Summary of the Findings ....................................................................................43! Chapter 8. The Fiddlehead ................................................................................................45! 8.1 The Fiddlehead........................................................................................................45! 8.2 An Examination of the Data....................................................................................45! v 8.3 A Summary of the Findings ....................................................................................48! Chapter 9: An Overview of the 2010 Contributors Published in The Malahat Review, Prairie Fire, Arc, and The Fiddlehead..............................................................................49! 9.1 An Examination of the Aggregate Data ..................................................................49! 9.2 A Summary of the Aggregate Findings...................................................................51! Chapter 10. A Discussion of the Overall Findings............................................................52! 10.1 An Examination of the 1967 and 2010 Data .........................................................52! 10.1.1 Gender ...............................................................................................................52! 10.1.2 Race...................................................................................................................52! 10.1.3 Location.............................................................................................................54! 10.1.4 Education...........................................................................................................55! 10.1.5 Occupation ........................................................................................................56! 10.1.6 Previous Publications ........................................................................................58! 10.1.7 Editorial Duties .................................................................................................58! 10.2 Is Academia to Blame for the Decline in Poetry Readership?..............................59! Chapter 11. Conclusion, Limitations and Recommendations ...........................................63! 11.1 Conclusion.............................................................................................................63! 11.2 Limitations and Recommendations.......................................................................64! 11.3 A Postscript ...........................................................................................................66! References .........................................................................................................................69!