Key Decision Makers in the European Institutions Relating to Packaging Issues

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Key Decision Makers in the European Institutions Relating to Packaging Issues Key Decision Makers in the European Institutions relating to packaging issues EUROPEAN COMMISSION ENVIRONMENT Commissioner: Karmenu Vella (Malta) DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR ENVIRONMENT DIRECTOR GENERAL : Karl Falkenberg Directorate A : Green Economy Director: Kestutis Sadauskas Advisor : Herbert Aichinger Unit: Waste management and recycling Head of Unit: Julio Garcia Burgues Deputy Head of Unit: Julius Langendorff Policy Officer : Mrs Hatzi Hulla EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOOD SAFETY Commissioner: Vytenis Andriukaitis (Lithuania) DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY DIRECTOR GENERAL : Ladislav Miko Directorate E: Safety of the Food Chain Director: Michael Flueh Unit : Innovation and Sustainability Head of Unit: Chantal Bruetschy Deputy Head of Unit: G Gallhoff Food Contact Materials team: Legislative Officer : B. Schupp Legal Officer: J. Briggs EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY COMMITTEE Chair: Giovanni La Via (Italy) Group of European People’s Party Vice- Chair: Benedek Javor (Hungary) Greens / European Free Alliance Party Vice-Chair: Daciana Octavia Sarbu (Romania) Alliance of Socialists and Democrats Party Vice-Chair: Pavel Poc (Czech Republic) Alliance of Socialists and Democrats Party Vice-Chair: Gilles Pargneaux (France) Alliance of Socialists and Democrats Party MEPs working on current Reports of interest to packaging: Sirpa Pietikainen (Finland) Group of European People’s Party • Rapporteur for Non-Legislative Report: “Resource Efficiency – Moving Towards a Circular Economy” MEPs active on packaging issues: Margrete Auken (Denmark) Greens / European Free Alliance Party • Rapporteur on Plastic Bag measure Simona Bonafè (Italy) Alliance of Socialists and Democrats Party • Rapporteur on Circular Economy legislative package which was abandoned Pilar Ayuso (Spain) Group of European People’s Party • Long standing friend of paper packaging industry Karl-Heinz Florenz (Germany) Group of European People’s Party • Previously shown interest in packaging Françoise Grossetête (France) Group of European People’s Party • Previously shown interest in packaging Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy (Netherlands) Alliance of Liberals and Democrats Party • Previously shown interest in packaging MEPs interested in Forestry Issues: Cristofer Fjellner (Sweden) Group of the European People’s party Matthias Groote (Germany) Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats Claude Turmes (Luxembourg) Greens / European Free Alliance Party .
Recommended publications
  • Frans Timmermans Cc: Günther Oettinger, Jyrki Katainen, Karmenu Vella and Phil Hogan
    Frans Timmermans Cc: Günther Oettinger, Jyrki Katainen, Karmenu Vella and Phil Hogan European Commission Rue de la Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels 20th March 2018 Dear First Vice-President Timmermans, We are writing to you as civil society representatives (environmental NGOs, farmers, food movements, and animal welfare groups) regarding the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) reform, following recent details given in Commission presentations to the Council and the Parliament on its substance, in particular the common EU objectives. 1) We would like to recall that for the next CAP to be truly results-oriented, make effective and efficient use of EU taxpayers’ money, and respond to citizens’ demands to better protect our natural resources, ensure the welfare of farmed animals and ensure many and diversified farms, the EU objectives should be specific, measurable and time-bound so that progress towards them can be properly monitored.1 2) Unfortunately we are very concerned that the objectives will be very general and vague, which will make it very easy for Member States to systematically choose the least ambitious measures without facing adequate monitoring or control—as experienced with the last reform’s ‘greening’, which added complexity and completely failed to address the challenges facing the sector. 3) Furthermore, objectives focussed on increasing production—such as ‘food security’—are not only unjustified in the context of overproduction and overconsumption in Europe, especially of animal products, but also risk undermining other objectives on the long-term resilience of the sector, the environment, animal welfare, climate, human health and fair income for the smallest and most sustainable farms.
    [Show full text]
  • TTIP-Letter-To-Schul
    Mr. Martin Schulz, President of the European Parliament European Parliament Bât. Paul-Henri Spaak, 09B011 60, rue Wiertz B-1047 Bruxelles 7 July 2016 Dear Mr. Schulz, In anticipation of the 14th round of negotiations between the EU and US for the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) planned to start on 11 July in Brussels, we are writing to you on behalf of over 65 organisations representing consumers, farmers, not-for-profit health insurers, environmental and general public interest groups to express our serious concerns that the European Commission is failing to respect the European Parliament’s 2015 Resolution on TTIP. 1 Today, we released new analysis, which demonstrates that the European Commission continues to ignore critical aspects of the European Parliament’s Resolution on TTIP, in particular regarding recommendations related to protecting public health, the environment, and democracy. 1. Negotiating on and affecting EU chemicals and pesticides rules The European Parliament has called on the European Commission not to negotiate on issues “where the EU and the US have very different rules” and not to allow regulatory cooperation to affect future standards in such areas. However, the European Commission has continued to negotiate on issues that will affect legislation on chemicals, pesticides, and cosmetic products, whether directly or through regulatory cooperation. This is particularly worrying because the European Commission is already lowering current EU standards of protection (such as on limits to pesticide residues in food) in order to remove barriers to trade. 2. Respect for the EU regulatory system The European Parliament has called on the European Commission “to fully respect the established regulatory systems on both sides of the Atlantic”.
    [Show full text]
  • Speakers' Biographies
    EUROPEAN TOURISM DAY BRUSSELS, 7 NOVEMBER 2018 SPEAKERS BIOGRAPHIES ELŻBIETA BIEŃKOWSKA European Commission Ms Bieńkowska has been the EU Commissioner for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs in the European Commission of Jean-Claude Juncker (since 2014). She was the Minister for Regional Development of Poland (between 2007 and 2013) and the Deputy Prime Minister and the Minister of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Poland (2013-2014). As the Deputy Prime Minister and the Minister of Infrastructure and Development, she was in charge of the strategic development system of the country, including the effective investment of European funds. Her work resulted in the full absorption of EU funds from the 2004-2006 budget and the successful distribution of almost EUR 68 billion granted to Poland (for the years 2007-2013). She managed the process of the preparation of the efficient EU funds implementation system from the EU budget for the years 2014-2020. Apart from the European funds, her tasks in the Polish Government included the management of transport infrastructure (roads, railway, air traffic and ship transport) and issues related to construction and housing. Between 1999 and 20017, she worked for the local government of the Silesia Region in Southern Poland. KARMENU VELLA European Commission Mr Vella is the European Commissioner for Environment, Maritime Affairs and Fisheries at the European Commission. He was first elected to the European Parliament in 1976 and has been re-elected nine consecutive times. During his political career, he has served as the Minister for Tourism and Aviation (2013-2014), the Tourism Minister (1996-1998), the Minister for Public Works (1981-1983), as well as a Member of the Maltese Parliament (1976-2014).
    [Show full text]
  • THE JUNCKER COMMISSION: an Early Assessment
    THE JUNCKER COMMISSION: An Early Assessment John Peterson University of Edinburgh Paper prepared for the 14th Biennial Conference of the EU Studies Association, Boston, 5-7th February 2015 DRAFT: Not for citation without permission Comments welcome [email protected] Abstract This paper offers an early evaluation of the European Commission under the Presidency of Jean-Claude Juncker, following his contested appointment as the so-called Spitzencandidat of the centre-right after the 2014 European Parliament (EP) election. It confronts questions including: What will effect will the manner of Juncker’s appointment have on the perceived legitimacy of the Commission? Will Juncker claim that the strength his mandate gives him license to run a highly Presidential, centralised Commission along the lines of his predecessor, José Manuel Barroso? Will Juncker continue to seek a modest and supportive role for the Commission (as Barroso did), or will his Commission embrace more ambitious new projects or seek to re-energise old ones? What effect will British opposition to Juncker’s appointment have on the United Kingdom’s efforts to renegotiate its status in the EU? The paper draws on a round of interviews with senior Commission officials conducted in early 2015 to try to identify patterns of both continuity and change in the Commission. Its central aim is to assess the meaning of answers to the questions posed above both for the Commission and EU as a whole in the remainder of the decade. What follows is the proverbial ‘thought piece’: an analysis that seeks to provoke debate and pose the right questions about its subject, as opposed to one that offers many answers.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Report by the Committee on Constitutional Affairs on the Modification of the Act of 20 September 1976 (1 February 2012)
    Second report by the Committee on Constitutional Affairs on the modification of the Act of 20 September 1976 (1 February 2012) Caption: Report dated 1 February 2012, drawn up by the European Parliament’s Committee on Constitutional Affairs, on the proposal for a modification of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the Members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage. Source: European Parliament. Second report on a proposal for a modification of the Act concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage of 20 September 1976 – Committee on Constitutional Affairs – Rapporteur : Andrew Duff, A7-0027/2012. Strasbourg: 01.02.2012. 14 p. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A7-2012- 0027+0+DOC+PDF+V0//en. Copyright: (c) European Parliament URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/second_report_by_the_committee_on_constitutional_affairs_on_the_modification_of_the_act_o f_20_september_1976_1_february_2012-en-5114272a-e549-445f-8206-ce1d55153153.html Last updated: 10/06/2014 1 / 15 10/06/2014 EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2009 - 2014 Plenary sitting A7-0027/2012 1.2.2012 SECOND REPORT on a proposal for a modification of the Act concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage of 20 September 1976 (2009/2134(INI)) Committee on Constitutional Affairs Rapporteur: Andrew Duff RR\890949EN.doc PE472.030v03-00 EN United in diversity EN 2 / 15 10/06/2014 PR_INI_art114mod CONTENTS Page MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION............................................ 3 ANNEX – Consolidated version of the Act concerning the election of the representatives of the Assembly by direct universal suffrage annexed to the Council decision of 20 September 1976, and of the subsequent amendments thereto.....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Forests Communication FE
    Communication from the European Commission Stepping up EU Action to Protect and Restore the World’s Forests. 2019, July 24th After last December’s announcement of the EU’s initiative to “step up European Action against Deforestation and Forest Degradation”, the European Commission has published yesterday its Communication “on stepping up EU Action to Protect and Restore the World’s Forests.” The document was presented by Frans Timmermans (first vice-president of the Commission) and Jyrki Katainen, (vice-president of the Commission and Commissioner for Jobs, Growth, Investment & Competitiveness) and praised both by Karmenu Vella (Commissioner for environment, maritime affairs and fisheries) and Neven Mimica (Commissioner for International Development). The Commission starts with the following assessment: Despite the EU’s recent positive trend in the growth of domestical forest cover, the global level still shows a bleak picture of continuing logging and rapidly disappearing forests, in particular regarding tropical primary forests. Indirectly, through consumption and trade, the EU is causing deforestation too as it represents around 10% of final consumption of products associated with deforestation. These products include palm oil, meat, soy, cocoa, rubber, timber and maize in the form of processed products or services. Thus the Communication expressed that deforestation and forest degradation pose a significant risk and challenge that needs to be tackled globally with more actions ”as despite all the efforts, we currently fall short on the conservation and sustainable use of forests”. Therefore the Commission calls for “a variety of regulatory and non-regulatory actions” and proposes a list of initial actions to reach its two-fold obJective of protecting the existing forests and to restore and increase the coverage worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Directory of the European Union
    ISSN 1831-6271 Regularly updated electronic version FY-WW-12-001-EN-C in 23 languages whoiswho.europa.eu EUROPEAN UNION EUROPEAN UNION Online services offered by the Publications Office eur-lex.europa.eu • EU law bookshop.europa.eu • EU publications OFFICIAL DIRECTORY ted.europa.eu • Public procurement 2012 cordis.europa.eu • Research and development EN OF THE EUROPEAN UNION BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑ∆Α • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND
    [Show full text]
  • To: Mr Maroš Šefčovič, Vice-President of the European Commission Mr
    To: Mr Maroš Šefčovič, Vice-President of the European Commission Mr Jyrki Katainen, Vice-President of the European Commission Mr Miguel Arias Cañete, Commissioner for Climate Action and Energy Mr Phil Hogan, Commissioner for Agriculture and Rural Development Mr Karmenu Vella, Commissioner for Environment and Maritime Affairs Cc: Mr Alexander Italianer, Secretary General of the European Commission Mr Jean-Eric Paquet, Deputy Secretary-General of the European Commission Brussels, 19 October 2016 Subject: Forest owners and managers’ views on the forthcoming Bioenergy Sustainability Policy Dear Vice-Presidents, Dear Commissioners, In the context of the ongoing work of the European Commission on developing a bioenergy sustainability policy for the EU, the Confederation of European Forest Owners (CEPF) and the European State Forest Association (EUSTAFOR) wish to elaborate their views on the topic of biomass sustainability. The active and sustainable management of European forests has a more crucial role than ever in contributing to the EU objectives of ensuring sustainable development, increasing the energy security, maintaining and creating jobs and boosting economic growth as well as decarbonizing the EU economy. In the EU, sustainable forest management is ensured and advanced through a comprehensive framework of policies at regional, national, EU and global level. This is coupled with well-established governance systems in the Member States that recognize the long history of secure ownership rights and long-term responsibility of 16 million private forest owners as well as the role of State Forest Management Organizations (SFMO), in securing the provision of market and non-market values from European forests to present and future generations in a sustainable way.
    [Show full text]
  • Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action
    Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CONTENTS With the European elections approaching, CAN The scores were based on the votes of all MEPs on Austria 2 Europe wanted to provide people with some these ten issues. For each vote, MEPs were either Belgium 3 background information on how Members of the given a point for voting positively (i.e. either ‘for’ Bulgaria 4 European Parliament (MEPs) and political parties or ‘against’, depending on if the text furthered or Cyprus 5 represented in the European Parliament – both hindered the development of climate and energy Czech Republic 6 national and Europe-wide – have supported or re- policies) or no points for any of the other voting Denmark 7 jected climate and energy policy development in behaviours (i.e. ‘against’, ‘abstain’, ‘absent’, ‘didn’t Estonia 8 the last five years. With this information in hand, vote’). Overall scores were assigned to each MEP Finland 9 European citizens now have the opportunity to act by averaging out their points. The same was done France 10 on their desire for increased climate action in the for the European Parliament’s political groups and Germany 12 upcoming election by voting for MEPs who sup- all national political parties represented at the Greece 14 ported stronger climate policies and are running European Parliament, based on the points of their Hungary 15 for re-election or by casting their votes for the respective MEPs. Finally, scores were grouped into Ireland 16 most supportive parties. CAN Europe’s European four bands that we named for ease of use: very Italy 17 Parliament scorecards provide a ranking of both good (75-100%), good (50-74%), bad (25-49%) Latvia 19 political parties and individual MEPs based on ten and very bad (0-24%).
    [Show full text]
  • COMMISSIONER Miguel Arias Cañete
    To: Mr. Maroš Šefčovič, Vice-President of the European Commission B-1049 Brussels Cc: COMMISSIONER Miguel Arias Cañete, Climate Action & Energy COMMISSIONER Karmenu Vella, Environment, Maritime Affairs & Fisheries COMMISSIONER Neven Mimica, International Cooperation & Development COMMISSIONER Johannes Hahn, European Neighbourhood Policy & Enlargement Negotiations Brussels, 09 June 2015 Health benefits of Serbia’s climate mitigation ambition Dear Vice-President Šefčovič, This week you will be in Serbia for visits including the “EU-SERBIA High Level Conference on Climate Change” on 10-11 June 2015. We understand that during these meetings, the Serbian government may announce its ambition for its greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation target, on the road to the Paris Climate conference in December 2015. In your meetings with Serbian officials, we call on you to underline the importance of high ambition on climate mitigation, which will also bring benefits to the health of Serbians and Europeans. Serbia relies heavily on coal power generation for energy production and plans to increase its capacity even more. Coal-fired power plants are both a major contributor to carbon emissions and air pollution. According to a recent assessment by the European Commission 1, Serbia has the second worst air quality in Europe, which results in premature death, ill-health and lost productivity. The health costs of coal power generation alone in Serbia are estimated to be up to 4.98 billion EUR per year 2. Earlier this month the Deputy Health Minister of Serbia, prof dr Berislav Vekić called on his Government colleagues to consider health protection in energy choices, and to take the long-term effects on population health into account when developing energy policies.
    [Show full text]
  • German Press Review – 07 October 2013
    German Press Review – 07 October 2013 European Parliament Refugees President Martin SCHULZ demands more solidarity within the European Union to host refugees. "This means also that Germany will have to welcome more refugees." MEP Manfred WEBER expressed similar opinion. MEP Cornelia ERNST said that Frontex is main part of a completely false asylum policy. MEP Hélène FLAUTRE estimates that nearly 25.000 refugees have died in the last 20 years in the Mediterranean see. Bild, p. 2 Der Spiegel, p. 104-106 Die Welt, p. 5 die tageszeitung, p. 3 European Elections/ Der Spiegel reports in detail about the next European Elections and especially Top candidates about the difference to the last elections, i.e. that all big party families will nominate candidates for the EU Commission President. The Social democrats may nominate President Martin SCHULZ. Der Spiegel, p. 34 Tobacco directive Süddeutsche Zeitung reports about the tobacco directive and especially about the massive lobby efforts of the tobacco industry. A number of German MEPs report about their experience with the tobacco lobby or are mentioned in the article. MEPs Matthias GROOTE, Rebecca HARMS, Renate SOMMER, Karl-Heinz FLORENZ, Holger KRAHMER and Peter LIESE are cited. Süddeutsche Zeitung, p. 19 working hours for Süddeutsche Zeitung reports on the vote about new rules for pilots. MEPs Michael pilots CRAMER and Knut FLECKENSTEIN criticize content, intention and procedure of the planned changes of the EU Commission. Süddeutsche Zeitung, p. 23 Lobbyism/ EU Der Spiegel reports in detail about high ranked officials of the European Commission Commission that continue their well paid career at lobby offices after having ended working for the institution.
    [Show full text]
  • Karmenu VELLA ' Brussels, 13 November 2014 Frans
    Ref. Ares(2014)3784827Ares(2015)1291649 - 13/11/201424/03/2015 Karmenu VELLA Member of the European Commission ' Brussels, 13 November 2014 Ref. Ares(2014) Frans Timmermans First Vice-President of the European Commission BERI 12/202 Фаалг, -plu/Ł, Dear Vicepresident, As discussed last week, I am attaching a preliminary assessment of the air quality and circular economy packages based on work by DG Environment on the basis of the task confided in me by President Juncker in my Mission letter, and in view of the preparation of the Commission Work Programme for 2015, I believe these assessments speak for themselves but let me highlight a few key points. First of all, I am, like you, insistent on the idea that, given the maturity of the legal framework on the environment, new legislative proposals in this area must be justifiable not only because of their value in improving the state of the environment but in how they contribute to the overall political priorities of this Commission, in particular to generating jobs, growth and competitiveness but also to the Energy Union. Decisions on whether to pursue work on these proposals must be considered on this basis, together with an assessment of their likelihood of being adopted by Council and Parliament within a reasonable timeframe. 1. Contribution to the Priorities of this Commission The air package has been designed fundamentally to tackle a health problem, namely the 400,000 premature deaths yearly in the ELI that can be put down to air pollution. However, the impact assessment was solidly grounded in a cost/benefit analysis looking at the impact on labour productivity of the proposal (reduction of days lost at work etc.) as well as reducing costs to health systems.
    [Show full text]