DOCSLIB.ORG

King Gyanendra and the Destruction of Democracy in Nepal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
King Gyanendra and the Destruction of Democracy in Nepal KING GYANENDRA AND THE DESTRUCTION OF DEMOCRACY IN NEPAL: Extrait du Le Journal des Alternatives http://journal.alternatives.ca/spip.php?article1773 KING GYANENDRA AND THE DESTRUCTION OF DEMOCRACY IN NEPAL: - EN - Our organisation - Archives - National Projects - Alternatives Newspaper - 2005 - Vol. 9 No 7 - Date de mise en ligne : Monday 4 April 2005 Description : On 1 February 2005, King Gyanendra of Nepal usurped all executive powers of State through a proclamation of Emergency in the country that has been precipitously descending into bloody chaos since his anointment as the king following the inexplicable massacre of the royal clan on 1 June 2001. Copyright © Le Journal des Alternatives - All rights reserved Copyright © Le Journal des Alternatives Page 1/5 KING GYANENDRA AND THE DESTRUCTION OF DEMOCRACY IN NEPAL: On 1 February 2005, King Gyanendra of Nepal usurped all executive powers of State through a proclamation of Emergency in the country that has been precipitously descending into bloody chaos since his anointment as the king following the inexplicable massacre of the royal clan on 1 June 2001. The king justified the proclamation by citing the failure of the political parties in taking a unified approach against terrorism, their inability to hold elections in time and also their betrayal of the people's aspirations for social, political and economic justice. The accusations are uncanny for the reason that the monarchical manipulations, as enumerated below, have directly contributed to these failures of the multiparty system in Nepal. A FRAUD ON THE CONSTITUTION: In his televised addressed, King Gyanendra promised that the council of ministers being appointed under his chairmanship "will give utmost priority to reactivating multiparty democracy in the country within three years..." The king referred to Article 27(3) of the 1990 Constitution to claim legitimacy for his takeover. Article 27 (3) says that "His Majesty is to preserve and protect this Constitution by keeping in view the best interests and welfare of the people of Nepal." The communiqué issued by his press secretariat explained that the declaration of a state of emergency by the king was in accordance with Article 115 (1), which allows him to take the step in the event of a grave danger to the sovereignty or integrity of the kingdom. Article requires the proclamation to be approved by a two-thirds majority of the lower house of parliament within three months or of the National Assembly, meaning the upper house, when the lower house, having been dissolved, does not exist. The proclamation of Emergency under Article 115 can last, with the approval of parliament, for the maximum period of nine months. The lower house of Parliament has remained dissolved since 22 May 2002. Consequently, the 60-member National Assembly too remains defunct. Its composition ensures that a motion to ratify the emergency, even if the king should allow it to meet, would fail. However, in brazen contempt of the constitutional procedure for the ratification of the emergency and its permissible period, the king has promised to "give utmost priority to reactivating multiparty democracy", through the council of ministers under his chairmanship announced by him on 1 February 2005, within three years. This fraud on the constitution, irrespective of the consequences, is nothing short of a coup comparable only to the capture of political power by Gyanendra's father King Mahendra on 15 December 1960 when he had introduced the Panchayat system after dismissing the first elected government in the country under Prime Minister B. P. Koirala. MONARCHICAL MANIPULATIONS AND THE FAILURES OF THE MULTIPARTY SYSTEM: Gyanendra , who became the king of Nepal for the second time under circumstances of calamity for the country, had been crowned earlier in November 1950 when he was a three year-old infant. His grand-father Tribhuwan, along with all his sons, had then moved to India to work out the Delhi Agreement of 1951, which promised the end of feudal autocracy in Nepal and a democratic rule for its people under a constitution to be framed by an elected Constituent Assembly. Infant Gyanendra was relieved of the crown when his grand-father returned to Nepal in February 1951 to proclaim the inauguration of a democratic era under a constitutional monarchy. The story of more than 5 decades long struggle of the Nepali people to obtain that promise and their travails under royal machinations is long and harrowing. The so-called Democratic Revolution of April 1990 has been hailed as a significant, even if partial, achievement in that direction. The achievement got quickly dissipated even as the combined political leadership of the Nepali Congress and the United Left Front, in their haste for power, failed to safeguard the promise of a democratic rule under a constitution to be framed by an elected Assembly. The political power they obtained, under the policy of "national reconciliation with the palace", was partial. But it corrupted their political vision and culture swiftly and totally. More radical elements within the political process became quickly disenchanted to adopt the path of a "people's war". Starting from the mid-western hilly region of the country, where the people lived in abysmal conditions of poverty and deprivation of all fundamental human rights Copyright © Le Journal des Alternatives Page 2/5 KING GYANENDRA AND THE DESTRUCTION OF DEMOCRACY IN NEPAL: even as the State remained entrenched in its primitive feudalism, the "people's war" became widespread and implacable. The military response of the Nepali State under inspiration of "the global war on terror" and its failure to pursue the path of conciliation through honest dialogue on political reform merely galvanized the insurgency. Gyanendra's takeover of the kingdom, following the royal massacre on 1 June 2001, provided steam to the conflict. Prime Minister Koirala resigned from office on 19 July 2001, little over six weeks after the coronation of Gyanendra, to concede his inability to militarily defeat the insurgency. Sher Bahadur Deuba replaced him to announce a truce with the Maoists. The ceasefire and the attempt at peace talks quickly failed because of the government's unwillingness to discuss substantial reforms like the election of a constituent assembly to rewrite a new constitution for the country. King Gyanendra used the situation to encroach into the executive authority of State by declaring a State of Emergency on 26 November 2001. Sher Bahadur Deuba, who remained the head of the caretaker government, ingratiated himself to the king by supporting the extension of the Emergency and by brining in draconian laws like TADO. He also dissolved the lower house of the national parliament to remove the threat of a parliamentary opposition to the emergency regime. This paved the way for the king to further dismantle the façade of democracy that had been developed since April 1990. On 4 October 2002, King Gyanendra made his first direct move to run the country under the cover of Article 127 of the Constitution, which allows him to "issue necessary orders" to remove "any difficulty" "in connection with the implementation of the Constitution." Under this cover, the king sacked Deuba's government, assumed all executive authority and appointed his own cabinet and a prime minister to run the administration. The takeover was blatantly illegal. Under Article 36(1) of the 1990 Constitution, the king can only appoint the leader of the majority party in parliament as Prime Minister. In the absence of a clear majority and the failure of political agreement on a coalition government, the king is required to dissolve the parliament and to hold fresh elections within six months. Article 127 requires that the king's orders to remove "any difficulty" "in connection with the implementation" of the constitution "shall be laid before parliament". But there was no parliament, having already been dissolved by Deuba. The illegal emergency regime, with the king remaining its executive head, made a ceasefire agreement with the Maoists in January 2003 and carried out open negotiations with their leaders over the next seven months. The peace talks ultimately broke down in August 2003 as the Maoists refused to give up their demand for a constituent assembly and the government tried to militarily destroy their organization even as the façade of negotiations was on. The massacre of 19 Maoist sympathizers carried out by the Royal Nepal Army on 17 August 2003 at Doramba, even as the government representatives and the Maoists leaders were talking peace at Dang, has been exhaustively documented by the National Human Rights Commission of Nepal and other international human rights organizations. The incident epitomizes the brutality, lawlessness and total impunity with which the Nepali regime aims to stamp out the unrest in the country. REPORTS OF STATE ATROCITIES: The illegal emergency regime lasted until 2 June 2004 when, under the pressure of the "anti-regression" demonstrations organized jointly by five political parties, the king once again appointed Sher Bahadur Thapa as the Prime Minister of a multi-party government, which promised peace talks with the Maoists and early elections. The promises remained empty and unfulfilled as the government, under active encouragement of the United States arguing against appeasement with "Pol Pot like" Maoists, exhausted itself in anti-insurgency operations. The American ambassador to Nepal Michael E. Malinowki, who compared the Maoists with Cambodia's genocidal Pol Pot regime and Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda, went on reconnaissance missions to the military camps in the frontline insurgency infected areas apparently to boost the morale of the Nepali troops. Human rights violations and atrocities, including unlawful killings, summary executions, enforced disappearances, custodial torture, illegal detention and abduction, committed by both the State forces and the Maoist guerrillas became rampant and widespread.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nepal – Without a Parliament and Laws on Torture and Forced Disappearance, the Office of the OHCHR in Nepal Cannot Fulfil Its Work for Human Rights
    December 7, 2005 Ms Louise Arbour High Commissioner for Human Rights OHCHR-UNOG 8-14 Avenue de la Paix 1211 Geneva 10 SWITZERLAND Fax: +41 22 917-9012 Open letter to the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights to mark International Human Rights Day 2005 Dear Ms. Arbour, Re: Nepal – without a Parliament and laws on torture and forced disappearance, the Office of the OHCHR in Nepal cannot fulfil its work for human rights On the occasion of the December 10, 2005 International Human Rights Day, the Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) wishes to highlight the continuing flagrant abuses being perpetrated in Nepal and request your intervention regarding specific issues. AHRC welcomes the establishment of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in Nepal and commends you for your commitment and efforts in brining about this much-needed development. AHRC was involved in efforts to lobby for the establishment of this office and notes with satisfaction that it is now functioning and well staffed. The reported agreement between the CPN-Maoist insurgents and an alliance of seven opposition political parties presents new opportunities for the resolution of the country’s internal conflict through a democratic process. AHRC appreciates the intervention of the High Commissioner in a press release issued on December 1st, 2005, urging the Maoists to extend their unilateral ceasefire (which they have now reportedly done) and respect human rights, and for the Government of King Gyanendra and the security forces to also call a ceasefire and respect the rights to the freedoms of expression and peaceful assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2004 2009 Session document 21 February 2005 B6-0130/◄2005 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION with request for inclusion in the agenda for the debate on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law pursuant to Rule 115 of the Rules of Procedure by Nirj Deva, Charles Tannock, Thomas Mann, Geoffrey Van Orden and Simon Coveney on behalf of the EPP-ED on ◄Nepal PE 356.281 B6-0130/2005 European parliament resolution on Nepal The European Parliament, A. whereas in May 2002 HM King Gyanendra of Nepal dissolved Parliament on the recommendation of the then Prime Minister Deuba, requesting the Prime Minister to hold a general election by November 2002, whereas a European Parliament delegation was nominated to observe the elections scheduled for November 2002, whereas,however, these elections could not be held owing to a lack of security caused by the activities of the self- professed Maoist guerrillas, B. noting that the Prime Minister, whose sole mandate as per the Nepalese Constitution had been to create a stable environment conducive to holding general elections and to bringing the guerrillas into a restricted settlement, asked that his caretaker government's tenure be extended for a further 14 months and that the King was compelled to dismiss him in October 2002 owing to his inability to carry out this mandate, subsequently, according to a provision in Article 127 of the Nepalese Constitution, appointing Prime Minister Chand, later Prime Minister Thapar, and then re-appointing Prime Minister Deuba to fulfil this same mandate, C. noting that the guerrillas had 9 seats in the first Nepalese Parliament after the restoration of the multi-party system in 1990, yet in the second general election in 1994, they failed to secure a single seat in the House of Representatives, D.
    [Show full text]
  • From Transition to Defective Democracy: Mapping Asian Democratization
    From Transition to Defective Democracy: Mapping Asian Democratization AUREL CROISSANT This article undertakes a systematic inquiry of democratic development in Asia. It shows two main trends of democratization in south, south-east and north-east Asia. First, in most of the democracies the institutionalization of political rights exists side by side with stagnation or decline of the rule of law and civil liberties. Second, the quality of democracy in the different countries is growing further apart. While new democracies in north-east Asia are on the track to democratic consolidation, democracy in south Asia is on the edge or has already fallen victim to authoritarian renewal. In south-east Asia, democratic consolidation is stagnating. The article also provides for a systematic analysis of why and how defective democracies originate. It argues that not a single primary cause but a set of interconnected variables influences the track of democratic development. While ‘Asian values’, the type of colonial rule and ethnic heterogeneity give only weak support for democracy in Asia, socio-economic development, political institutions, stateness and political party systems are more important determinants. In the last section the article offers a sceptical outlook on the prospects for further liberal democratic development in Asia, arguing that for most young democracies in the region remaining a defective democracy is the most likely prospect in the near future. Key words: Pacific Asia; democratization; defective democracy; consolidation; ethnicity This inquiry undertakes a systematic review of democratic development in Asia. It draws on the concept of defective democracy developed by Wolfgang Merkel and others.1 The analysis will proceed as follows: first, it outlines an empirical map of democratic regimes in Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • European Union Democracy Promotion in Nepal
    From Monarchy to the Republic: European Union Democracy Promotion in Nepal Robot Limbu Dissertation submitted as a partial requirement for the conferral of the degree of Master in international Studies Supervisor: Doctor Luís Nuno Rodrigues, Full Professor ISCTE-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa Co-Supervisor: Doctor Diogo Bernardo de Penha Lemos, Guest Assistant ISCTE-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa October, 2020 Resumo O estudo avaliou o papel desempenhado pela União Europeia na facilitação da rápida transição do Nepal de uma monarquia para uma república democrática onde o povo exercia o controle sobre a liderança e governança do país por meio de seus representantes eleitos. O Nepal vinha tentando mudar do poder absoluto centralizado de um reino para o poder distributivo descentralizado do povo por meio de uma democracia por algum tempo, mas falhou na maioria das tentativas, pois a liderança do reino não permitiria a integração de ideologias democráticas na governança do país. O estudo utilizou análises secundárias qualitativas, com um enfoque particular em estudos de caso, para identificar e estabelecer a importância do envolvimento da UE na facilitação da democratização do Nepal. Os resultados obtidos neste estudo indicaram que a União Europeia esteve ativamente envolvida no processo de democratização do Nepal, através do qual prestou assistência humanitária e financeira, além de interferir como membro da comunidade internacional na denúncia das injustiças do governo, especialmente as injustiças de direitos humanos. Os resultados estabeleceram que a UE começou formalmente a apoiar o processo de democratização do país no ano de 2006, durante o II Movimento Popular, que resultou em uma mudança de regime bem-sucedida no Nepal, e uma transição no estilo de governança, com preferência por uma democracia sobre uma monarquia, pois esta era a melhor solução política para proteger os direitos humanos no Nepal, ao mesmo tempo em que promove o crescimento e o desenvolvimento econômico.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal One Hundred Days After Royal Takeover and Human Rights Crisis Deepens February 1– May 11, 2005
    Nepal One Hundred Days after Royal Takeover and Human Rights Crisis Deepens February 1– May 11, 2005 12 May 2005 Published by Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA) This report is a compilation of contributions coming from different organizations and individuals, both within Nepal and outside. Due to security reasons, the names of the contributors, editors and their institutional affiliations are not disclosed. 2 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 1.0 INTRODUCTION 7 1.1 General overview of the country 7 1.1.1 Socio-political development 7 1.1.2 Human rights regime 9 1.1.2.1 Constitution of the Kingdom of Nepal 1990 9 1.1.2.2 International human rights instruments 12 2.0 GROSS VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS 14 2.1 An overview of the violation of human rights after the royal-military takeover 14 2.1.1 Restrictions on media 15 2.1.2 Restrictions on travel 16 2.1.3 Violations by the Maoists 16 2.2 Constitutional and legal issues 17 2.2.1. Accountability 17 2.2.2 State of emergency 17 2.2.3 Legal standing of Government 19 2.2.4. Suppression of dissent 19 2.3 State of emergency and international obligations 19 2.3.1 Pre-conditions for declaring a state of emergency 20 2.3.2 Notification under ICCPR Article 4 21 2.4 Judiciary and constitutional institutions under trial 22 2.4.1 Royal Commission for Corruption Control (RCCC) 23 2.4.2 Violation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 24 2.4.3 Torture in detention 26 2.4.4 Judicial reluctance to engage in human rights protection 26 2.4.5 Militarization of the governance system
    [Show full text]
  • 30Main Edition-Pg15-0.Qxd (Page 1)
    Mumbai, Mon, May 1, 2006 p15 weather... world Cities in degree centigrade max min max min max min Bangkok 35 28 Hong Kong 29 24 Moscow 10 0 Beijing 20 15 Islamabad 38 23 New York 14 5 Colombo 30 29 Karachi 36 28 Paris 15 6 Chicago 16 4 London 16 5 Singapore 34 26 Dubai 34 24 Los Angeles 24 14 Tokyo 20 8 Blair fights to put scandals behind him — p16 ... short stories... Iran playing games: Rice Washington: US Secre- tary of State Condoleezza ‘They are killers’ Rice on Sunday accused Iran of “playing games” in the dispute over its nu- Manama, Bahrain. “Suryanarayana clear program and called Who are Taliban? Suryanarayana’s was in Bahrain for training and then on Tehran to come clean he also worked in Maldives for us. He Afghanistan was invaded by employers have and halt uranium enrich- was a simple and kindhearted person. the Russians in 1979. Ten ment. Speaking on ABC He was part of our family.It is a freak years later Afghan fighters announced a Rs 20 lakh television, Rice dismissed Iranian offers to tragedy that he was taken by the Tal- allow spot inspections of its nuclear facili- sent them packing with the compensation help of US and the iban as he was very familiar with the ties and to reopen discussions on a Russian local situation and security hazards,” proposal to conduct sensitive fuel cycle Mujahedeen. But the country soon fell into disarray. It was KSR Menon. Dubai Ahmed said. work for Tehran. —AFP then the Taliban came to the As a mark of respect, the Head he was a US spy and pleading Pak releases A Q Khan’s aide fore.
    [Show full text]
  • BRITAIN-NEPAI.J SOOIETY JOURNAIJ NO.Ll
    BRITAIN-NEPAI.J SOOIETY JOURNAIJ NO.ll 1987 BA CLAYS EDD Corporate Finance Capital raising. Secondary offerings. Flotations. Mergers, acquisitions and disposals. Corporate advice. Market making and Distribution UK gilts and fixed income securities. VK and international equities, margin instruments, futures and options. International Capital Markets Fixed and floating rate securities. US Government bonds. Note issuance facilities. Euro-commercial paper. Sterling commercial paper. Interest and currency swaps. Commercial Banking Syndicated loans. Off-balance-sheet financing. Treasury and Foreign Exchange A comprehensive range of treasury and security-related foreign exchange facilities. Research Investment research and economic analysis covering a wide range of markets, industries and companies in the UKand internationally. Private Client Services Private client investment management service both on a discretionary and non-discretionary basis. Unit trust fund selection service. Institutional Fund Management Investment and property management for institutions conducted through separately incorporated subsidiaries to ensure complete independence. DeVelopment ,,-""'k-"'""U Equity and loan development capital for the growing company. Manageinent and employee buy-outs. London· Hong Kong· Tokyo· New York· Amsterdam· Canberra· Sydney· Melbourne Birmingham· ManchesteJr THE INVESTM ENT BANKING A RlVi OFTH E BARCLAYS GROUP HEAD OFFICE: EBBGATE HOUSE,2 SWAN LAN E, LONDON EC4R 3TS.TELEPHONE: 01-623 2323.TELEX: 8812124 BZ\,\' G Performance. It's the most important word in the mind of any shrewd investor. But while unit trusts are quick to tell you how they perform in relation to other unit trusts, they never mention how they- measure up to Investment Trusts. THE FIGURES Over the years Investment Trusts have performed extremely well. And many of those managed by Flemings have consistently beaten the industry average.
    [Show full text]
  • Samjhana Inclusiveness in Nepalese Civil
    Inclusiveness in Nepalese Civil Service: Perception Analysis from Gender Perspective. By Samjhana Rayamajhi MPPG 5th Batch December 2016 Inclusiveness in Nepalese Civil Service: Perception Analysis from Gender Perspective. By Samjhana Rayamajhi MPPG 5th Batch Supervisor Dr. Narendra Raj Poudel Thesis Submitted to be Public Policy and Governance (PPG) Program in the partial fulfilled for the award of Master in Policy Public and Governance (MPPG) December 2016 i Dedication Dedicated to my Late Father who is my source of Inspiration. I miss you. ii Declaration I declare that the dissertation entitled “Inclusiveness in Nepalese Civil Service: Perception Analysis from Gender Perspective” submitted to the PPG Program of North South University, Bangladesh for the Degree of Master in Public Policy and Governance (MPPG) is an original work of mine. No part of it, in any form, has been copied from other sources without acknowledgement or submitted to any other university or institute for any degree or diploma. Views and expressions of the thesis bear the responsibility of mine with the exclusion of PPG for any errors and omissions to it. Signature Full Name: Samjhana Rayamajhi ID No. 1511228085 iii Acknowledgement First and foremost, I am grateful to partner institution of MPPG program; Department of Administration and Organization Theory, University of Bergen (UoB); Norway, Central Department of Public Administration (CDPA), Tribhuvan University (TU), Nepal; North South University (NSU), Bangladesh; and University of Paradeniya (UoP), Sri Lanka. I highly acknowledge to “The Norwegian Programme for Capacity Development in Higher Education and Research for Development (NORHED) by providing financial support throughout the study. It is a great pleasure for me to express my gratitude to my respected supervisor Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL Annual Report 2006.Qxd
    INDIA SRI LANKA PAKISTAN SAARC MALDIVES HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT 2006 NEPAL BHUTAN BANGLADESH ASIAN CENTRE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT 2006 S A R C ASIAN CENTRE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS edited by: Suhas Chakma SAARC Human Rights Report 2006 Edited by: Suhas Chakma Director, Asian Centre for Human Rights Published by: Asian Centre for Human Rights C-3/441-C, Janakpuri, New Delhi 110058 INDIA Phone/Fax: +91 11 25620583, 25503624 Website: www.achrweb.org Email: [email protected] First published 2006 © Asian Centre for Human Rights, 2006. No part of this publication can be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without prior permission of the publisher. Photos: Courtesy - India (The Tribune, India, 26 April 2005 at http://www.tribuneindia.com/2005/20050426/punjab.htm) Sri Lanka (http://img406.imageshack.us/img406/1469/r28473599251cy.jpg) Pakistan (BBC News, 3 March 2005 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4315491.stm) Maldives (Minivannews.com; http://www.minivannews.com/photos/12-13/pages/bf%20(24)_jpg.htm) Nepal (Kantipur Online, Nepal at http://www.kantipuronline.com/admin/nepfrontimg/kpr2005-7-25.jpg) Bhutan (http://ec.europa.eu/echo/images/photos/nepal/nepal_01.jpg) Bangladesh (http://www.albd.org/newsletter/2004/hartal_women_torture.jpg) ISBN : 81-88987-15-8 Price Rs. 745/- SAARC Human Rights Report 2006 iii Table of Contents Preface . .1 1. SAARC Human Rights Violators Index 2006 I. Indicators for ranking . .3 II. Explanation about ranking . .3 II. SAARC Human Rights Violators Index . .4 Bangladesh: Rank 1st . .4 Bhutan: Rank 2nd . .6 Nepal: Rank 3rd .
    [Show full text]
  • Political Violence in South and Southeast Asia
    United Nations University Press is the publishing arm of the United Nations University. UNU Press publishes scholarly and policy-oriented books and periodicals on the issues facing the United Nations and its peoples and member states, with particular emphasis upon international, regional and transboundary policies. The United Nations University was established as a subsidiary organ of the United Nations by General Assembly resolution 2951 (XXVII) of 11 December 1972. It functions as an international community of scholars engaged in research, postgraduate training and the dissemination of knowledge to address the pressing global problems of human survival, development and welfare that are the concern of the United Nations and its agencies. Its activities are devoted to advancing knowledge for human security and development and are focused on issues of peace and governance and environment and sustainable development. The Univer- sity operates through a worldwide network of research and training centres and programmes, and its planning and coordinating centre in Tokyo. Political violence in South and Southeast Asia Political violence in South and Southeast Asia: Critical perspectives Edited by Itty Abraham, Edward Newman and Meredith L. Weiss © United Nations University, 2010 The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not neces- sarily reflect the views of the United Nations University. United Nations University Press United Nations University, 53-70, Jingumae 5-chome, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo 150-8925, Japan Tel: +81-3-5467-1212 Fax: +81-3-3406-7345 E-mail: [email protected] general enquiries: [email protected] http://www.unu.edu United Nations University Office at the United Nations, New York 2 United Nations Plaza, Room DC2-2062, New York, NY 10017, USA Tel: +1-212-963-6387 Fax: +1-212-371-9454 E-mail: [email protected] United Nations University Press is the publishing division of the United Nations University.
    [Show full text]
  • An Exceptional Kind of Courage
    An exceptional kind of courage ‘People who never know when they get up in the morning, what the day will bring and if they will still be alive that night and yet still be willing to put their lives on the line for others, display an exceptional kind of courage’ Testimonies from Human Rights Defenders at The Third Dublin Platform for Human Rights Defenders 13-15 October 2005 Dublin Castle Foreword On October 13-15, 2005, 100 human rights defenders from 70 countries met for three days in Dublin Castle, for the Third Dublin Platform for Human Rights Defenders. The meeting was organised by Front Line, with interpretation in Arabic, English, French, Spanish and Russian. The meeting welcomed a number of distinguished speakers, including Hina Jilani, the UN Secretary General's Special Representative on Human Rights Defenders; Mr Dermot Ahern TD, Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Government of Ireland; Mr Conor Lenihan TD, Minister of State for Overseas Development and Human Rights of the Government of Ireland; Mr. Michael Matthiessen, Personal Representative for Human Rights of Javier Solana, EU Secretary General/High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy; Marit Gjelten, Human Rights and Democracy Section, Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Piet de Klerk, Ambassador at large for Human Rights, Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Michel Doucin, Ambassador for Human Rights, French Ministry of Foreign Affairs; and Jonathon Wolstenholme, Head of Public Policy, Human Rights Unit, UK Department of Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs. There is something in all of us that responds to the bravery of those who are willing to risk their lives and freedom in defence of the rights of others.
    [Show full text]
  • Last Hope RIGHTS the Need for Durable Solutions for Bhutanese Refugees in Nepal and India WATCH May 2007 Volume 19, No
    Bhutan/Nepal HUMAN Last Hope RIGHTS The Need for Durable Solutions for Bhutanese Refugees in Nepal and India WATCH May 2007 Volume 19, No. 7(C) Last Hope The Need for Durable Solutions for Bhutanese Refugees in Nepal and India I. Executive Summary............................................................................................... 1 II. Recommendations .............................................................................................. 8 III. Background.......................................................................................................12 IV. Life in the Refugee Camps in Nepal ...................................................................18 Cuts in Essential Services .................................................................................18 Sexual and Gender-Based Violence...................................................................23 V. Life for Ethnic Nepalis in Bhutan.........................................................................27 No Objection Certificates ..................................................................................27 Education .........................................................................................................30 Compulsory labor..............................................................................................30 Land ownership ................................................................................................ 31 Democratization ...............................................................................................34
    [Show full text]