Promoting Development in Shared River Basins Case Studies from International Experience

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Promoting Development in Shared River Basins Case Studies from International Experience WATER GLOBAL PRACTICE Promoting Development in Shared River Basins Case Studies from International Experience Mehmet Altingoz, Antti Belinskij, Christian Brethaut, Afonso do Ó, Suren Gevinian, Glen Hearns, Marko Keskinen, Melissa McCracken, Vadim Ni, Niko Soininen, and Aaron T. Wolf About the Water Global Practice Launched in 2014, the Word Bank Group’s Water Global Practice brings together financing, knowledge, and implementation in one platform. By combining the Bank’s global knowledge with country investments, this model generates more firepower for transformational solutions to help countries grow sustainably. Please visit us at www.worldbank.org/water or follow us on Twitter @WorldBankWater. Promoting Development in Shared River Basins Case Studies from International Experience Mehmet Altingoz, Antti Belinskij, Christian Bréthaut, Afonso do Ó, Suren Gevinian, Glen Hearns, Marko Keskinen, Melissa McCracken, Vadim Ni, Niko Soininen, and Aaron T. Wolf © 2018 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org This work is a product of the staff of the World Bank with external contributions. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of the World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of the World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this work is subject to copyright. Because the World Bank encourages dissemination of its knowledge, this work may be reproduced, in whole or in part, for non-commercial purposes as long as full attribution to this work is given. Please cite the work as follows: Altingoz, Mehmet, Antti Belinskij, Christian Bréthaut, Afonso do Ó, Suren Gevinian, Glen Hearns, Marko Keskinen, Melissa McCracken, Vadim Ni, Niko Soininen, and Aaron T. Wolf. 2018. “Promoting Development in Shared River Basins: Case Studies from International Experience.” Washington, DC, World Bank. Any queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to World Bank Publications, The World Bank Group, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2625; e-mail: [email protected]. Cover photo: Aldeadavila Dam on the Douro River on the border between Spain and Portugal. © Rusm/ iStock. Cover design: Jean Franz, Franz & Company, Inc. Contents Preface xi Abbreviations xiii Chapter 1 Kura-Araks Basin 1 Summary: Three-Stage Process of Coordinated Basin Development 1 Part A: The Arpacay/Akhuryan Dam between Armenia and Turkey 1 Identification of Opportunities and Risks 1 Design of Intervention 2 Implementation and Compliance 3 Application of the Five Dimensions 4 Part B: Water Quality Management by Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia 4 Identification of Opportunities and Risks 4 Design of Intervention 5 Implementation and Compliance 5 Application of the Five Dimensions 5 Case Study Description 6 Introduction 6 Part A: The Arpaçay/Akhuryan Dam 7 Regulatory Framework 8 Protocol on the Beneficial Uses of Boundary Waters (1927) 8 Protocol on the Joint Construction of the Arpaçay Dam (1964) 9 Cooperation Agreement on the Construction of a Dam on the Bordering Arpaçay River and the Constitution of a Dam Lake (1973) 9 Protocol Concerning Mainly Technical Cooperation, Riverbed Changes (1990) 9 Protocol on the Establishment of Diplomatic Relations and the Protocol on the Development of Bilateral Relations (2009) 10 Institutional Frameworks 10 Analysis and Implementation 11 Key Points 14 Part B: Basin Water Quality 15 Regulatory Frameworks 16 International Conventions 16 Regional Policies 16 National Policies and Plans 17 Institutional Frameworks 18 International Institutions 18 National Institutions 18 International Projects and Agencies 19 Promoting Development in Shared River Basins iii Analysis and Implementation 20 The Water Quality Problem 20 Implementation of Regulatory and Institutional Frameworks 21 Progress and Challenges 24 Conclusions 25 Annexes 27 ANNEX 1A 27 Sub-Annex 27 Institutional Organization Charts 28 ANNEX 2A Treaty and Agreement Text or Text Reference 29 Convention Concerning Use of Water from Border Rivers and Streams between the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the Turkish Republic 31 Agreement between the Government of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the Turkish Republic on Cooperation in the Construction of a Dam and a Water Reservoir on the Akhurian (Arpa-Chai) Border River 34 Rules of Simplified Mutual Crossing of the Soviet-Turkish Border and Temporary Stay of Soviet and Turkish Citizens Involved in and Supervising Dam Construction on the Akhurian (Arpa-Chai) River 37 Guidelines on the Joint Operation of the Dam and Water Reservoir on the Akhurian (Arpa-Chai) River 41 Notes 46 Chapter 2 Columbia Basin 47 Summary: Three-Stage Process of Coordinated Basin Development 47 Identification of Opportunities and Risks 47 Design of Intervention 48 Implementation and Compliance 48 Application of the Five Dimensions 50 Case Study Description 51 Introduction 51 Institutional Framework 53 Non-Treaty Storage 54 Benefits Beyond the Basin 55 Competing Issues and Solutions 55 Difference of Opinion 1 57 Difference of Opinion 2 58 Difference of Opinion 3 58 Coordinated Operations of the Cascade System 59 Planning, Management, and Operations 59 iv Promoting Development in Shared River Basins Initial Filling Provisions 61 Filling Provisions for Treaty Storage 62 Summary of Duncan Special Operating Program (1 April 1967–31 March 1968) 63 Filling of Non-Treaty Storage (Revelstoke and Extra Storage at Mica) 66 Flood Control, Early Warning and Data Exchange 67 Hydrometeorological Committee and Data Sharing 68 Conclusions 70 Annexes 72 ANNEX 2A 72 History and General Information 72 Agreements 72 Hydrometeorological Data 72 Notes 72 Chapter 3 Chu and Talas Basins 77 Summary: Three-Stage Process of Coordinated Basin Development 77 Identification of Opportunities and Risks 77 Design of Intervention 78 Implementation and Compliance 79 Application of the Five Dimensions 80 Case Study Description 80 Introduction 80 Regulatory Framework on the Operation of Cascade and Water Quantity Management 82 All-Union Ministry of Melioration and Water Economy Regulations 83 Protocol on Sharing Operational Costs on the Water Management Facilities of Interstate Status 84 Bilateral Agreement on the Use of Water Management Facilities of Interstate Status 84 Institutional Arrangements for Transboundary Water Cooperation in the Chu and Talas Basins 86 Actual Implementation of the Regulatory and Institutional Framework 91 Reported Activities of the Bilateral Commission, Its Secretariat, and Working Groups 91 Stakeholder View of the Process 93 Analysis of the Implementation of the Regulatory and Institutional Framework 95 Conclusions and Recommendations 97 Notes 100 Chapter 4 Vuoksi Basin 101 Summary: Three-Stage Process of Coordinated Basin Development 101 Identification of Opportunities and Risks 101 Promoting Development in Shared River Basins v Design of Intervention 102 Implementation and Compliance 102 Application of the Five Dimensions 103 Case Study Description 104 Introduction 104 Study Context 105 Development of the International Regulatory Framework in the Vuoksi River 107 Geopolitical Background: Finish-Russian Relations 107 Water Cooperation between Finland and Russia 108 Cooperation in the Vuoksi River Basin 110 Theme 1: Institutional Cooperation 110 Regulatory Framework for Cooperation 110 Cooperation in Practice 112 Theme 2: Flow Regulation in the Vuoksi 116 Regulatory Framework for Flow Regulation 116 Flow Regulation in Practice 118 Theme 3: Compensation Mechanisms 121 Regulatory Framework for Compensations 121 Compensation Mechanisms in Practice 122 Conclusions 124 Annexes 127 ANNEX 4A 127 Key Agreements and Treaties 127 ANNEX 4B 128 Methodology 128 Notes 129 Chapter 5 Douro Basin 135 Summary: Three-Stage Process of Coordinated Basin Development 135 Identification of Opportunities and Risks 135 Design of Intervention 136 Implementation and Compliance 136 Application of the Five Dimensions 138 Case Study Description 138 Introduction 138 Regulatory Framework 140 Tools that are Part of the Regulatory Framework and Operate at Different Levels 140 Institutional Arrangements 147 Stakeholders’ Role, Scope of Action, and Liability 147 Inter-Relations, Level of Cooperation and Conflict Potential 151 vi Promoting Development in Shared River Basins Actual Implementation of the Framework 153 Informal Arrangements Guiding Implementation Not Captured in Formal Agreements 154 Implementation Success in Achieving the Goals Laid out in Ruling Agreements 155 Hindrances and What Would Need to Be Done to Achieve Framework Objectives 157 Conclusions 159 Annexes 160 ANNEX 5A 160 List of Interviewees 160 ANNEX 5B 160 Flowcharts 160 Web Links 161 Notes 162 Chapter 6 Rhône Basin 165 Summary: Three-Stage Process of Coordinated Basin Development 165 Part A: Coordination for Hydropower Production 165 Identification of Opportunities and Risks 165 Design of Intervention 166 Implementation and Compliance 167 Part B: Sediment Flushing at Verbois Dam 167 Identification of Opportunities and Risks 167 Design
Recommended publications
  • Akhuryan Basin Management Area KEY WATER ISSUES
    ARMENIA Akhuryan Basin Management Area KEY WATER ISSUES EEnvi ronmenPt al Pr otectioIn of IntRe rnati onal RivBe r Basin s The project is funded This project is implemented by a consortium by the European Union led by Hulla & Co. Human Dynamics KG The Environmental Protection of International River Basins (EPIRB) project aims to improve the quality of water in transboundary river basins in the wider Black Sea region and Belarus, including Armenia. One of the specific objectives is to improve technical capacities by developing river basin management plans (RBMPs) in selected pilot river basins, according to the requirements of the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD). One of the selected pilot basins is the Akhuryan basin management area, which includes the Akhuryan River basin, located in the western part of the Republic of Armenia, and the Metsamor River basin, which is adjacent to the Akhuryan River basin. 2 Good water status The Water Framework Directive is achieved when pollution is and river basin management plans controlled and there is One of the requirements of the WFD is the achievement and sufficient flow for ecosystems preservation of good water status by managing waters in natural to function and survive. units — that is, in river basins. River basin planning follows a structured approach: finding out facts, deciding on necessary actions, making a management plan, and putting the plan into practice. An important first step is to identify significant water management issues so that appropriate solutions and measures can be developed. The impacts of human activities Human activities can lead to serious problems in terms of both water quality and quantity.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Value-Chains Assessment Report April 2020.Pdf
    1 2 ABOUT THE EUROPEAN UNION The Member States of the European Union have decided to link together their know-how, resources and destinies. Together, they have built a zone of stability, democracy and sustainable development whilst maintaining cultural diversity, tolerance and individual freedoms. The European Union is committed to sharing its achievements and its values with countries and peoples beyond its borders. ABOUT THE PUBLICATION: This publication was produced within the framework of the EU Green Agriculture Initiative in Armenia (EU-GAIA) project, which is funded by the European Union (EU) and the Austrian Development Cooperation (ADC), and implemented by the Austrian Development Agency (ADA) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in Armenia. In the framework of the European Union-funded EU-GAIA project, the Austrian Development Agency (ADA) hereby agrees that the reader uses this manual solely for non-commercial purposes. Prepared by: EV Consulting CJSC © 2020 Austrian Development Agency. All rights reserved. Licensed to the European Union under conditions. Yerevan, 2020 3 CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 5 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................... 6 2. OVERVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT DYNAMICS OF AGRICULTURE IN ARMENIA AND GOVERNMENT PRIORITIES.....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ra Shirak Marz
    RA SHIRAK MARZ 251 RA SHIRAK MARZ Marz center – Gyumri town Territories - Artik, Akhuryan, Ani, Amasia and Ashotsk Towns - Gyumri, Artik, Maralik RA Shirak marz is situated in the north-west of the republic. In the West it borders with Turkey, in the North it borders with Georgia, in the East – RA Lori marz and in the South – RA Aragatsotn marz. Territory 2681 square km. Territory share of the marz in the territory of RA 9 % Urban communities 3 Rural communities 116 Towns 3 Villages 128 Population number as of January 1, 2006 281.4 ths. persons including urban 171.4 ths. persons rural 110.0 ths. persons Share of urban population size 60.9 % Share of marz population size in RA population size, 2005 39.1 % Agricultural land 165737 ha including - arable land 84530 ha Being at the height of 1500-2000 m above sea level (52 villages of the marz are at the height of 1500-1700 m above sea level and 55 villages - 2000 m), the marz is the coldest region 0 of Armenia, where the air temperature sometimes reaches -46 C in winter. The main railway and automobile highway connecting Armenia with Georgia pass through the marz territory. The railway and motor-road networks of Armenia and Turkey are connected here. On the Akhuryan river frontier with Turkey the Akhuryan reservoir was built that is the biggest in the country by its volume of 526 mln. m3. Marzes of the Republic of Armenia in figures, 1998-2002 252 The leading branches of industry of RA Shirak marz are production of food, including beverages and production of other non-metal mineral products.
    [Show full text]
  • Stocktaking Exercise to Identify Legal, Institutional, Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation Gaps and Barriers in Water Resour
    “National Adaptation Plan to advance medium and long-term adaptation planning in Armenia” UNDP-GCF Project Stocktaking exercise to identify legal, institutional, vulnerability assessment and adaptation gaps and barriers in water resources management under climate change conditions Prepared by “Geoinfo” LLC Contract Number: RFP 088/2019 YEREVAN 2020 Produced by GeoInfo, Ltd., Charents 1, Yerevan, Armenia Action coordinated by Vahagn Tonoyan Date 11.06.2020 Version Final Produced for UNDP Climate Change Program Financed by: GCF-UNDP “National Adaptation Plan to advance medium and long-term adaptation planning in Armenia” project Authors National experts: Liana Margaryan, Aleksandr Arakelyan, Edgar Misakyan, Olympia Geghamyan, Davit Zakaryan, Zara Ohanjanyan International consultant: Soroosh Sorooshian 2 Content List of Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................... 7 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 12 CHAPTER 1. ANALYSIS OF POLICY, LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK OF WATER SECTOR AND IDENTIFICATION OF GAPS AND BARRIERS IN THE CONTEXT OF CLIMATE CHANGE ............................. 19 Summary of Chapter 1 .......................................................................................................................... 19 1.1 The concept and criteria of water resources adaptation to climate change .................................
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Tourist Attraction
    Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... rediscover armenia guide armenia > tourism > rediscover armenia guide about cilicia | feedback | chat | © REDISCOVERING ARMENIA An Archaeological/Touristic Gazetteer and Map Set for the Historical Monuments of Armenia Brady Kiesling July 1999 Yerevan This document is for the benefit of all persons interested in Armenia; no restriction is placed on duplication for personal or professional use. The author would appreciate acknowledgment of the source of any substantial quotations from this work. 1 von 71 13.01.2009 23:05 Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... REDISCOVERING ARMENIA Author’s Preface Sources and Methods Armenian Terms Useful for Getting Lost With Note on Monasteries (Vank) Bibliography EXPLORING ARAGATSOTN MARZ South from Ashtarak (Maps A, D) The South Slopes of Aragats (Map A) Climbing Mt. Aragats (Map A) North and West Around Aragats (Maps A, B) West/South from Talin (Map B) North from Ashtarak (Map A) EXPLORING ARARAT MARZ West of Yerevan (Maps C, D) South from Yerevan (Map C) To Ancient Dvin (Map C) Khor Virap and Artaxiasata (Map C Vedi and Eastward (Map C, inset) East from Yeraskh (Map C inset) St. Karapet Monastery* (Map C inset) EXPLORING ARMAVIR MARZ Echmiatsin and Environs (Map D) The Northeast Corner (Map D) Metsamor and Environs (Map D) Sardarapat and Ancient Armavir (Map D) Southwestern Armavir (advance permission
    [Show full text]
  • Int Ccpr Css Arm 43371 E
    1.This report reflects the position of the "Cultural Centre of the Caucasus Yezidi" (hereinafter- CCCY), which works in the field of protection of rights and freedoms, protection of the cultural heritage of the Yazidi community in their countries of residence. The Yazidi community of Armenia is a national minority. 2.The Authors of the CCCY report welcome the official report Republicof Armenia and share many of its assessments and conclusions. We agree that the government of Georgia is committed to following the country's international obligations in the field of the protection of national minorities in several ways, and that there have been some positive changes in national legislation and domestic policy in recent years. 3. The CCCY report, however, is an alternative to the official one. From the outset, we did not consider confrontation with the government's position or the refutation of official information and official conclusions as our goal. The task of the report was to present a different from the official view of the situation with the involvement of other sources of information. At the same time, we tried, as far as possible, to avoid duplication of general information contained in the government report. This kind of description is intended, in our opinion, to promote a more versatile and deeper understanding of interested international organizations about human rights problems in Armenia, among national minorities, as well as meaningful and constructive discussions on these topics within the country. 4.For several decades, especially the last 5 years, conditions have been created when the entire ethnic group began to actively emigrate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Socio-Economic Impact of Climate Change in Armenia
    The Socio-Economic Impact of Climate Change in Armenia "Climate Change Impact Assessment" Project Yerevan 2009 The Socio-Economic Impact of Climate Change in Armenia Yerevan 2009 Authors: Elizabeth A. Stanton, Frank Ackerman, Flávia Resende, Stockholm Environment Institute – U.S. Center Tufts University, 11 Curtis Avenue Somerville, MA 02144, www.sei-us.org Reviewers: Anil Markandya, Basque Center for Climate Change, Seth Landau, Consultant Project Title: Climate Change Impact Assessment, UNDP/00049248 Implementing Agency: UNDP Armenia Implementing Partner: Ministry of Nature Protection of the Republic of Armenia UNDP Support: Keti Chachibaia, Regional Technical Advisor for Adaptation, Anna Kaplina, Programme Analyst, Bratislava UNDP Regional Centre for Europe and CIS Diana Harutyunyan, Climate Change Projects Manager, Vahagn Tonoyan, Task Leader, Climate Change Impact Assessment Project, UNDP Armenia Contributions: Cornelia Herzfeld, Ramón Bueno, and Adam Knoff at SEI-U.S, Mikhail Vermishev, Artem Kharazyan, Alvina Avagyan, Gagik Manucharyan, Anahit Hovsepyan, Hamlet Melkonyan, Levon Sahakyan, Ara Keshishyan, Armen Gevorgyan, Armen Nalbandyan, Benyamin Zakaryan, Boris Mnatsakanyan, Levon Chilingaryan, Georgi Fayvush, Lyonik Khachatryan, Rudik Nazaryan, Tigran Sadoyan and Hunan Ghazaryan, National Experts on Climate Change at UNDP Armenia Acknowledgement: This report, initiated by Mrs. Consuelo Vidal, Resident Representative of UNDP Armenia, is a product of cooperation and commitment of an extensive group of local and international consultants
    [Show full text]
  • Communication Strategy and Plan for the Akhuryan Pilot Water Basin Management Area (Akhuryan and Metsamor River Basins)
    Environmental Protection of International River Basins Project Contract No. 2011/279-666 This project is funded by A project implemented by a Consortium the European Union led by Hulla & Co. Human Dynamics KG EPIRB Project Activity 2.7 Public involvement and awareness raising activities Task 2.7.1: Develop a communication strategy for each basin Communication Strategy and Plan for the Akhuryan Pilot Water Basin Management Area (Akhuryan and Metsamor River Basins) March 2014 Produced by: The Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe (REC) Ady Endre ut, 9-11 2000, Szentendre, Hungary Authors: Imola Koszta, Jovanka Ignjatovic, Magdolna Toth Nagy Acknowledgements: To Vahagn Tonoyan, Country Water Management Expert, Armenia Produced for: Hulla & Co - Human Dynamics Financed by: European Union This document has been prepared for the European Union however it reflects the views only of the authors and the Human Dynamics Consortium implementing the project and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. EPIRB Activity 2.7: Communication Strategy and Plan for Akhuryan basin area TABLE OF CONTENT ACRONYMS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 PART I: BACKGROUND FOR DEVELOPING A COMMUNICATION STRATEGY FOR THE PILOT BASINS .... 3 1. The Legal and Policy Framework ...................................................................................................... 3 1.1. The Water Framework
    [Show full text]
  • Georgi Fayvush & Alla Aleksanyan Plant Diversity in Riverine Wetlands of Armenia
    Bocconea 29: 77-89 https://doi.org/10.7320/Bocc29.077 Version of Record published online on 5 August 2021 Georgi Fayvush & Alla Aleksanyan Plant diversity in riverine wetlands of Armenia Abstract Fayvush, G. & Aleksanyan, A.: Plant diversity in riverine wetlands of Armenia. — Bocconea 29: 77-89. 2021 — ISSN: 1120-4060 printed, 2280-3882 online. The article presents the results of a detailed comparative floristic analysis of the floras of wet- lands of the main river basins of Armenia. The taxonomic structure of the floras of individual basins and the ratio of life forms are considered, as well as a detailed chorological analysis is carried out. It is shown that, in general, the flora of the wetlands of Armenian river basins is mainly Holarctic, Circumboreal. The base of it constitute species are widely distributed in the north of Eurasia in the Postglacial period. A very large influence on the development of this flora had Ancient Mediterranean species survived the Ice Age in the more southern regions, in the Ancient Mediterranean. These species by their bio-ecological characteristics belong to hydro- and hygrophilous groups which are growing in wetlands in arid regions of the Earth. As for the features of the floras of separate river basins, they reflect the correct distribution of the territory of Armenia between Caucasian and Armeno-Iranian floristic province (between Circumboreal and Ancient Mediterranean subkingdoms of Holarctic floristic kingdom. Key words: Flora of Armenia, river basins, floristic analysis, wetlands. Introduction Armenia is a Southern Caucasian republic, bordering with Georgia (in the North), Azerbaijan (in the East), Turkey (in the West and South-West), and Iran (in the South).
    [Show full text]
  • Peatlands of Armenia / Moore in Armenien 323-333 © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; Download Unter
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Stapfia Jahr/Year: 2005 Band/Volume: 0085 Autor(en)/Author(s): Jenderedjian Karen Artikel/Article: Peatlands of Armenia / Moore in Armenien 323-333 © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Peatlands of Armenia K. JENDEREDJIAN Abstract: Armenia with an area of 29.743 km! is a mountainous country with a minimum altitude of 375 m and a maximum of 4.091 m a.s.l. (Mount Aragats). Depending on the character of origin, relief, hy- drology and plant formations 7 types of wetlands are distinguished in Armenia. Of them mires, sloping fens, bogged meadows, ephemeral and suspended marshes that are situated between altitudes 1.400 and 2.400 m a.s.l. can be considered as peat producing wetlands. The presence of Salvinia natans, white wa- ter-lily (Nymphaea alba, N. Candida), banana lily (Nymphoides peltata), bloder-worts (Ucricularia minor, U. intermedia) is characteristic sign of these wetlands. At least 70 peat deposits with total surface 3.000 ha are known in Armenia. Three peat deposits: Gilli, Saratovka and Shahnazar are of commercial impor- tance with total volume of peat 50 million m3. Armenian peat is of good agrochemical quality. In the 1980s total peat output was ca. 100.000 m3 annually. Main use of peat was in agriculture (fer- tiliser, litter for cattle) and balneology (mud cure). At present estimated peat excavation is about 50.000 m3 annually mainly for fuel. Peat producing wetlands are widely used for haying, grazing, especially dur- ing the dry season.
    [Show full text]
  • REHABILITATION of the RAILWAYS in the SOUTH CAUCASUS: ASSESSMENT of the POTENTIAL ECONOMIC BENEFITS Volume 2: Kars–Gyumri–Nakhchivan– Meghri–Baku Railway
    REHABILITATION OF THE RAILWAYS IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS: ASSESSMENT OF THE POTENTIAL ECONOMIC BENEFITS Volume 2: Kars–Gyumri–Nakhchivan– Meghri–Baku railway Funded by: Understanding conflict. Building peace. About International Alert International Alert helps people find peaceful solutions to conflict. We are one of the world’s leading peacebuilding organisations, with nearly 30 years of experience laying the foundations for peace. We work with local people around the world to help them build peace. And we advise governments, organisations and companies on how to support peace. We focus on issues which influence peace, including governance, economics, gender relations, social development, climate change, and the role of businesses and international organisations in high-risk places. www.international-alert.org This work has been produced with the assistance of the European Union and the UK Conflict Pool. We are also grateful for the support from our strategic donors: the UK Department for International Development UKAID; the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency; the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs; and the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade of Ireland. The opinions expressed in this report are solely those of International Alert and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of our donors. © International Alert 2014 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without full attribution. Layout by D. R. ink Front cover image: © DH Photos/iStockphoto Any photographs in this publication without sources specified were taken by Fuat Rasulov and Gubad Ibadoghlu during research trips.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Basin Management Plan for Akhuryan River Basin District
    Environmental Protection of International River Basins Project This project is funded by The European Union DRAFT BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR AKHURYAN RIVER BASIN DISTRICT March 2016 Acknowledgements The development of River Basin Management Plans for selected river basins/sub-river basins according to the requirements of the WFD is one of two specific objectives under the EU funded project “Environmental Protection of International River Basins” (Service Contract Nr. ENPI/2011/279-666, EuropeAid/131360/C/SER/Multi) implemented by Hulla & Co. Human Dynamics KG in consortium with the Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe (REC), CES Consulting Engineers Salzgitter GmbH, H.P. Gauff Ingenieure GmbH & Co. KG – JBG, Crimean Republic Association "Ekologiya I Mir" (CRAEM) and Ukrainian National Environmental NGO "Mama-86", for a period of 57 months from 30th January 2012 to 29th October 2016. For the preparation of this River Basin Management Plan for Akhuryan River Basin District of Armenia Specific acknowledgement is given to: − EPRIB" Project" team:" Mr." Timothy" Turner," Mr." Zurab" Jincharadze," Mr." Bernardas" Paukstys," Ms." Birgit" Vogel,"" Mr."Peter"Roncak,"Mr."Paul"Bujis,"Ms."Romina"Alvarez,"Mr."Vahagn"Tonoyan" − “Geoinfo”"LLC;"“Resource"Management”"LLC;"“NHRS”"LLC;" − Ministry"of"Nature"Protection"of"Armenia,"and"its"Water"Resources"Management"Agency,"Akhuryan"Water"Basin" Management"Authority,"Environmental"Impact"Monitoring"Centre,"Hydrogeological"Monitoring"Centre;" − Ministry"of"Emergency"Situations,"and"its"Armenian"State"Hydrometoerological"and"Monitoring"Service;"
    [Show full text]