Professor Sir Nevill Francis Mott Should Be on the Application of Wave CH, KB, Scd, FRS, Chevalier Ordre Nat

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Professor Sir Nevill Francis Mott Should Be on the Application of Wave CH, KB, Scd, FRS, Chevalier Ordre Nat 84 PROFILE head of theoretical physics at the Cavendish, Ralph Fowler, he set about finding his own problem which he decided Professor Sir Nevill Francis Mott should be on the application of wave CH, KB, ScD, FRS, Chevalier Ordre Nat. du Merite, Nobel Laureate in Physics mechanics to the scattering of charged particles - an active area of experimental investigation led by Ernest Rutherford. This work was published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society. One year after he graduated with first- in numerous countries - via handwritten class honours in 1928, Fowler arranged a letters most of which contained gems of grant to enable him to spend a year ideas that were treasured by their abroad, which he divided between visits to recipients. Unlike most of us he didn’t Copenhagen and Gottingen. At Copen­ have a cluttered desk with a massive pile in hagen he discussed with Niels Bohr the the in-tray; he worked in “real time”, startling prediction of Dirac in Cambridge writing first drafts of papers as ideas that the electron carried a spin, and began occurred to him and answering letters, work on a related problem. He clearly responding to requests for information, found it exciting to be in the company of and writing referee’s reports, references Bohr and other famous scientists of the era etc., often by return post. His mind was - for example, Pauli, Gamow, Heisenberg his principal filing cabinet. In these ways and Hartree, who visited Bohr’s famous he drew together ideas and people from institute. Before moving on to Gottingen, different disciplines in a unique manner. he returned for a few months to Cam­ bridge where he solved an important Born 30 September 1905, died 8 August 1996 problem relating to the scattering of alpha Early years particles. Chadwick, Rutherford’s second The death of Sir Nevill Mott at age 90 It was natural that Mott should take an in command, was clearly impressed and brought to a close the illustrious “life in early interest in physics. His mother and took Mott along to see Rutherford who science” of a man who stood academically, father both worked at the Cavendish exclaimed “If you think of anything else as well as literally, head and shoulders Laboratory at Cambridge University with like this, come and tell me.” This was above his contemporaries, many of whom J.J. Thomson, a few years after J.J.’s praise indeed and he later recalled it was were awed and inspired by his remarkable identification of cathode rays with on that day when he gained complete powers of intuition, his penetrating insight “corpuscles” (electrons) in 1897. In his confidence in his ability to make a career and his versatile creativity. autobiography “A Life in Science” he in theoretical physics. The staggeringly long length of his records that quite early in his life his While in Gottingen, where he had scientific career - his first paper was parents communicated to him the hoped to work with Max Born - an published in 1927 during the early days of excitement and importance of physics. opportunity that did not materialise owing quantum theory and his last on high- His mother taught him at home until he to Born being in poor health - Mott temperature superconductivity in 1996, was ten when he became a weekly boarder received an offer of a lectureship at four months after his death - must be at a small preparatory school near Manchester University under W.L. Bragg, unprecedented, and the range of his Stafford. Before he left that school at age which he accepted. A course of lectures he contributions to physics possibly 13 he was, according to his own words, gave there on wave mechanics led to his unequalled. He was the author of at least advanced in algebra and Latin and had first book “An Outline of Wave Mechanics” fifteen books and over three hundred been introduced to calculus. He spent the written at age 25. It was at Manchester scientific papers, covering a range of next five years as a boarder at Bristol’s where his interest turned to the properties topics as diverse as wave mechanics, Clifton College, where a gifted teacher, H. of materials, stimulated no doubt by the nuclear physics, the properties of metals, C. Beaven, instilled in him the beauty of power of the new technique of X-ray ionic crystals, semiconductors and glasses, mathematics. Later he recalled the crystallography to determine the structure and the nature of superconductivity - an excitement he felt when, at about age 16, of solids - a method which earned W.L. impressive list but, even so, one which he realised why any number raised to the Bragg (later Sir Lawrence and Cavendish does not convey or do justice to the range power nought equalled unity! In Professor of Experimental Physics) the of his activities. December 1923 he was awarded a major Nobel prize for physics, jointly with his Nevill Mott was a theoretical physicist scholarship by St John’s College, father W.H. Bragg. - a label far too narrow and restrictive to Cambridge, where he read for the An invitation to return to Cambridge describe his output and methods of mathematical tripos. came in 1930 and Mott accepted a working. His principal posts were at In spite of his mathematical ability, fellowship at Gonville and Caius College. Bristol and Cambridge but he was the Mott was never tempted to be a pure Now married, he found that theoretical “father” of a much larger community, mathematician; physics was his main physicists were rather more respected communicating (without the benefit of e- interest. His first research was undertaken than when he had first entered the mail) with hundreds of scientists, when he was an undergraduate. In the Cavendish. Nevertheless, the prime Europhysics News 28 28 1997 News Europhysics theoreticians and experimentalists alike, absence of any real suggestions from the interest there was still in atomic physics PROFILE 85 and 1932 was the Annus Mirabilis of the Europe, particularly in Germany, by the many recall the excitement at these Cavendish, when the neutron was application of quantum mechanics to the meetings. Numerous problems and discovered, the atom split and the positron understanding of the properties of metals puzzling properties of metals were solved (positive electron), predicted by Dirac, and of the difference between metals and at Bristol during those heady days - was first observed. Stimulated by this semiconductors. The work of Sommer- advancing the subject and, at the same extraordinary atmosphere and a field, Bloch, Peierls and Bethe was time, providing much of benefit to suggestion by Fowler that he write a book especially successful and Mott set about industrial metallurgists. on atomic collisions, Mott collaborated continuing this tradition. He found an In those six pre-war years at Bristol, with Harrie Massey to produce a classic enthusiastic supporter in Harry Jones, a Mott did not confine his attention to tome “The Theory of Atomic Collisions”, former research student of Fowler’s, and understanding the physics of metals. He which ran to several editions. together they wrote a famous textbook began his first work on semiconductors, a “Theory of the Properties of Metals and field with which he was to remain attached Bristol Alloys”. Strange as it may now seem to the for many more decades - in fact, well into In 1933, Mott accepted his first Chair, hundreds of solid-state physicists who his retirement. The initial stimulus came that of Professor of Theoretical Physics at learned their basic quantum mechanics of from Ronald Gurney who had arrived Bristol University. For six years up to the solids from this work, the book was not from Manchester and who, like Mott, had outbreak of the Second World War, he that well received by other theorists, being a remarkable talent for visualizing solids played a significant role in establishing criticised for lack of rigour. What in fact in terms of their constituent atoms and Bristol as one of the foremost centres for we see in this book is mathematics applied electron waves, without the need for solid-state physics. His philosophy, which to the direct interpretation of experi­ detailed mathematics. Together they he never abandoned during the remainder mental data, interspersed with bold wrote another “Mott and X” book (where of his life, was to have theoreticians and initiative ideas which leapfrog the formal in this case X was Gurney) titled experimentalists working closely together. development when the rigorous mathe­ “Electronic Processes in Ionic Crystals”. Together they laid the foundation of the field of colour centres in alkali halides by providing a description of the defects involved in terms of negative ion vacancies. They also worked out the physics behind the photographic process - why light falling on a grain of silver bromide was able to produce a speck of silver - the latent image. In 1940 Mott was awarded the Harker and Driffield medal from the Royal Photographic Society for this work. Four years earlier, at the age of 31, he had been elected a Fellow of The Royal Society. Mott’s personal qualities and human- itarianism were evident after the German occupation of Sudetenland, when there was a movement to rescue children of Physics Department, University of Bristol, 1935 Jewish descent from Czechoslovakia. He Front row, reading left to right looking at the photograph: W. Sucksmlth, H.W.B. Skinner, G.l. Harper, L.C. Jackson, N.F. and his wife, Ruth, with help from his Mott, A.M. Tyndall, S.H. Piper, I. Williams, H.H. Potter, W. Heitler. sister, Joan, housed two young refugees, Second row, reading left to right: ...Huntley, S.E.
Recommended publications
  • 2019 in the Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU)
    THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER FACTS AND FIGURES 2020 2 The University 4 World ranking 6 Academic pedigree 8 World-class research CONTENTS 10 Students 12 Making a difference 14 Global challenges, Manchester solutions 16 Stellify 18 Graduate careers 20 Staff 22 Faculties and Schools 24 Alumni 26 Innovation 28 Widening participation UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER 30 Cultural institutions UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER 32 Income 34 Campus investment 36 At a glance 1 THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER Our vision is to be recognised globally for the excellence of our people, research, learning and innovation, and for the benefits we bring to society and the environment. Our core goals and strategic themes Research and discovery Teaching and learning Social responsibility Our people, our values Innovation Civic engagement Global influence 2 3 WORLD RANKING The quality of our teaching and the impact of our research are the cornerstones of our success. We have risen from 78th in 2004* to 33rd – our highest ever place – in 2019 in the Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU). League table World ranking European ranking UK ranking 33 8 6 ARWU 33 8 6 WORLD EUROPE UK QS 27 8 6 Times Higher Education 55 16 8 *2004 ranking refers to the Victoria University of Manchester prior to the merger with UMIST. 4 5 ACADEMIC PEDIGREE 1906 1908 1915 1922 1922 We attract the highest-calibre researchers and teachers, with 25 Nobel Prize winners among J Thomson Ernest Rutherford William Archibald V Hill Niels Bohr Physics Chemistry Larence Bragg Physiology or Medicine Physics our current and former staff and students.
    [Show full text]
  • The Royal Society Medals and Awards
    The Royal Society Medals and Awards Table of contents Overview and timeline – Page 1 Eligibility – Page 2 Medals open for nominations – Page 8 Nomination process – Page 9 Guidance notes for submitting nominations – Page 10 Enquiries – Page 20 Overview The Royal Society has a broad range of medals including the Premier Awards, subject specific awards and medals celebrating the communication and promotion of science. All of these are awarded to recognise and celebrate excellence in science. The following document provides guidance on the timeline and eligibility criteria for the awards, the nomination process and our online nomination system Flexi-Grant. Timeline • Call for nominations opens 30 November 2020 • Call for nominations closes on 15 February 2021 • Royal Society contacts suggested referees from February to March if required. • Premier Awards, Physical and Biological Committees shortlist and seek independent referees from March to May • All other Committees score and recommend winners to the Premier Awards Committee by April • Premier Awards, Physical and Biological Committees score shortlisted nominations, review recommended winners from other Committees and recommend final winners of all awards by June • Council reviews and approves winners from Committees in July • Winners announced by August Eligibility Full details of eligibility can be found in the table. Nominees cannot be members of the Royal Society Council, Premier Awards Committee, or selection Committees overseeing the medal in question. More information about the selection committees for individual medals can be found in the table below. If the award is externally funded, nominees cannot be employed by the organisation funding the medal. Self-nominations are not accepted.
    [Show full text]
  • Chem 103, Section F0F Unit I
    Lecture 4 - Observations that Led to the Chem 103, Section F0F Nuclear Model of the Atom Unit I - An Overview of Chemistry Dalton’s theory proposed that atoms were indivisible particles. Lecture 4 • By the late 19th century, this aspect of Dalton’s theory was being challenged. • Work with electricity lead to the discovery of the electron, • Some observations that led to the nuclear model as a particle that carried a negative charge. for the structure of the atom • The modern view of the atomic structure and the elements • Arranging the elements into a (periodic) table 2 Lecture 4 - Observations that Led to the Lecture 4 - Observations that Led to the Nuclear Model of the Atom Nuclear Model of the Atom The cathode ray In 1897, J.J. Thomson (1856-1940) studies how cathode rays • Cathode rays were shown to be electrons are affected by electric and magnetic fields • This allowed him to determine the mass/charge ration of an electron Cathode rays are released by metals at the cathode 3 4 Lecture 4 - Observations that Led to the Lecture 4 - Observations that Led to the Nuclear Model of the Atom Nuclear Model of the Atom In 1897, J.J. Thomson (1856-1940) studies how cathode rays In 1897, J.J. Thomson (1856-1940) studies how cathode rays are affected by electric and magnetic fields are affected by electric and magnetic fields • Thomson estimated that the mass of an electron was less • Thomson received the 1906 Nobel Prize in Physics for his that 1/1000 the mass of the lightest atom, hydrogen!! work.
    [Show full text]
  • William Lawrence Bragg
    W ILLIAM L AWRENCE B R A G G The diffraction of X-rays by crystals Nobel Lecture, September 6, 1922* It is with the very greatest pleasure that I take this opportunity of expressing my gratitude to you for the great honour which you bestowed upon me, when you awarded my father and myself the Nobel Prize for Physics in the year 1915. In other years scientists have come here to express their thanks to you, who have received this great distinction for the work of an illustrious career devoted to research. That you should have given me, at the very out- set of my scientific career, even the most humble place amongst their ranks, is an honour of which I cannot but be very proud. You invited me here two years ago, after the end of the war, but a series of unfortunate circumstances made it impossible for me to accept your invi- tation. I have always profoundly regretted this, and it was therefore with the very greatest satisfaction that I received the invitation of Prof. Arrhenius a few months ago, and arranged for this visit. I am at last able to tell you how deeply grateful I am to you, and to give you my thanks in person. You have already honoured with the Nobel Prize Prof. von Laue, to whom we owe the great discovery which has made possible all progress in a new realm of science, the study of the structure of matter by the diffraction of X-rays. Prof von Laue, in his Nobel Lecture, has described to you how he was led to make his epochal discovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E Nobel Prizes in Nuclear Science
    Nuclear Science—A Guide to the Nuclear Science Wall Chart ©2018 Contemporary Physics Education Project (CPEP) Appendix E Nobel Prizes in Nuclear Science Many Nobel Prizes have been awarded for nuclear research and instrumentation. The field has spun off: particle physics, nuclear astrophysics, nuclear power reactors, nuclear medicine, and nuclear weapons. Understanding how the nucleus works and applying that knowledge to technology has been one of the most significant accomplishments of twentieth century scientific research. Each prize was awarded for physics unless otherwise noted. Name(s) Discovery Year Henri Becquerel, Pierre Discovered spontaneous radioactivity 1903 Curie, and Marie Curie Ernest Rutherford Work on the disintegration of the elements and 1908 chemistry of radioactive elements (chem) Marie Curie Discovery of radium and polonium 1911 (chem) Frederick Soddy Work on chemistry of radioactive substances 1921 including the origin and nature of radioactive (chem) isotopes Francis Aston Discovery of isotopes in many non-radioactive 1922 elements, also enunciated the whole-number rule of (chem) atomic masses Charles Wilson Development of the cloud chamber for detecting 1927 charged particles Harold Urey Discovery of heavy hydrogen (deuterium) 1934 (chem) Frederic Joliot and Synthesis of several new radioactive elements 1935 Irene Joliot-Curie (chem) James Chadwick Discovery of the neutron 1935 Carl David Anderson Discovery of the positron 1936 Enrico Fermi New radioactive elements produced by neutron 1938 irradiation Ernest Lawrence
    [Show full text]
  • Facts and Figures 2013
    Facts and Figures 201 3 Contents The University 2 World ranking 4 Academic pedigree 6 Areas of impact 8 Research power 10 Spin-outs 12 Income 14 Students 16 Graduate careers 18 Alumni 20 Faculties and Schools 22 Staff 24 Estates investment 26 Visitor attractions 28 Widening participation 30 At a glance 32 1 The University of Manchester Our Strategic Vision 2020 states our mission: “By 2020, The University of Manchester will be one of the top 25 research universities in the world, where all students enjoy a rewarding educational and wider experience; known worldwide as a place where the highest academic values and educational innovation are cherished; where research prospers and makes a real difference; and where the fruits of scholarship resonate throughout society.” Our core goals 1 World-class research 2 Outstanding learning and student experience 3 Social responsibility 2 3 World ranking The quality of our teaching and the impact of our research are the cornerstones of our success. 5 The Shanghai Jiao Tong University UK Academic Ranking of World ranking Universities assesses the best teaching and research universities, and in 2012 we were ranked 40th in the world. 7 World European UK European Year Ranking Ranking Ranking ranking 2012 40 7 5 2010 44 9 5 2005 53 12 6 2004* 78* 24* 9* 40 Source: 2012 Shanghai Jiao Tong University World Academic Ranking of World Universities ranking *2004 ranking refers to the Victoria University of Manchester prior to the merger with UMIST. 4 5 Academic pedigree Nobel laureates 1900 JJ Thomson , Physics (1906) We attract the highest calibre researchers and Ernest Rutherford , Chemistry (1908) teachers, boasting 25 Nobel Prize winners among 1910 William Lawrence Bragg , Physics (1915) current and former staff and students.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawrence Bragg's “Brainwave” Drives Father-Son Collaboration
    www.mrs.org/publications/bulletin HISTORICAL NOTE Lawrence Bragg’s “Brainwave” Drives Father-Son Collaboration In 1912, some 17 years after the serendip- and quickly began to learn what he could itous discovery of x-rays by Wilhelm on the subject. Röntgen, a debate raged as to the wave or Until this point in his life, at age 42, particle nature of this radiation phenome- William later recalled, “It had never non. William Henry Bragg, a 50-year-old entered my head that I should do any professor of physics at Leeds University in research work.” His curiosity aroused by England, came down firmly on the side of his reading on radiation, he soon obtained particles, citing the bullet-like nature of the some radium samples and began the rays, and how they were preferentially experiments that were to make him a lead- scattered in the forward direction when ing figure in radiation theory in a few colliding with matter. Max von Laue of years’ time. He quickly developed novel Germany, having produced elegant spot- hypotheses about the nature of radioactiv- diffraction photographs of CuS by aiming ity. The penetrating power of x-rays, and x-rays at crystal samples, used the diffrac- the fact that they are not deflected by a tion behavior as evidence for the wave magnetic field, were accounted for by the argument. Experiments by Charles G. “neutral pair hypothesis,” which stated Barkla that demonstrated the polarization that x-rays consisted of “an electron which of x-rays confirmed the wave theory in the has assumed a cloak of darkness in the minds of many scientists.
    [Show full text]
  • (Owen Willans) Richardson
    O. W. (Owen Willans) Richardson: An Inventory of His Papers at the Harry Ransom Center Descriptive Summary Creator: Richardson, O. W. (Owen Willans), 1879-1959 Title: O. W. (Owen Willans) Richardson Papers Dates: 1898-1958 (bulk 1920-1940) Extent: 112 document boxes, 2 oversize boxes (49.04 linear feet), 1 oversize folder (osf), 5 galley folders (gf) Abstract: The papers of Sir O. W. (Owen Willans) Richardson, the Nobel Prize-winning British physicist who pioneered the field of thermionics, contain research materials and drafts of his writings, correspondence, as well as letters and writings from numerous distinguished fellow scientists. Call Number: MS-3522 Language: Primarily English; some works and correspondence written in French, German, or Italian . Note: The Ransom Center gratefully acknowledges the assistance of the Center for History of Physics, American Institute of Physics, which provided funds to support the processing and cataloging of this collection. Access: Open for research Administrative Information Additional The Richardson Papers were microfilmed and are available on 76 Physical Format reels. Each item has a unique identifying number (W-xxxx, L-xxxx, Available: R-xxxx, or M-xxxx) that corresponds to the microfilm. This number was recorded on the file folders housing the papers and can also be found on catalog slips present with each item. Acquisition: Purchase, 1961 (R43, R44) and Gift, 2005 Processed by: Tessa Klink and Joan Sibley, 2014 Repository: The University of Texas at Austin, Harry Ransom Center Richardson, O. W. (Owen Willans), 1879-1959 MS-3522 2 Richardson, O. W. (Owen Willans), 1879-1959 MS-3522 Biographical Sketch The English physicist Owen Willans Richardson, who pioneered the field of thermionics, was also known for his work on photoelectricity, spectroscopy, ultraviolet and X-ray radiation, the electron theory, and quantum theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Communications-Mathematics and Applied Mathematics/Download/8110
    A Mathematician's Journey to the Edge of the Universe "The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing." ― Socrates Manjunath.R #16/1, 8th Main Road, Shivanagar, Rajajinagar, Bangalore560010, Karnataka, India *Corresponding Author Email: [email protected] *Website: http://www.myw3schools.com/ A Mathematician's Journey to the Edge of the Universe What’s the Ultimate Question? Since the dawn of the history of science from Copernicus (who took the details of Ptolemy, and found a way to look at the same construction from a slightly different perspective and discover that the Earth is not the center of the universe) and Galileo to the present, we (a hoard of talking monkeys who's consciousness is from a collection of connected neurons − hammering away on typewriters and by pure chance eventually ranging the values for the (fundamental) numbers that would allow the development of any form of intelligent life) have gazed at the stars and attempted to chart the heavens and still discovering the fundamental laws of nature often get asked: What is Dark Matter? ... What is Dark Energy? ... What Came Before the Big Bang? ... What's Inside a Black Hole? ... Will the universe continue expanding? Will it just stop or even begin to contract? Are We Alone? Beginning at Stonehenge and ending with the current crisis in String Theory, the story of this eternal question to uncover the mysteries of the universe describes a narrative that includes some of the greatest discoveries of all time and leading personalities, including Aristotle, Johannes Kepler, and Isaac Newton, and the rise to the modern era of Einstein, Eddington, and Hawking.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Background Prepared by Dr, Robin Chaplin Professor of Power Plant Engineering (Retired) University of New Brunswick
    1 Historical Background prepared by Dr, Robin Chaplin Professor of Power Plant Engineering (retired) University of New Brunswick Summary: A review of the historical background for the development of nuclear energy is given to set the scene for the discussion of CANDU reactors. Table of Contents 1 Growth of Science and Technology......................................................................................... 2 2 Renowned Scientists............................................................................................................... 4 3 Significant Achievements........................................................................................................ 6 3.1 Niels Bohr........................................................................................................................ 6 3.2 James Chadwick .............................................................................................................. 6 3.3 Enrico Fermi .................................................................................................................... 6 4 Nuclear Fission........................................................................................................................ 7 5 Nuclear Energy........................................................................................................................ 7 6 Acknowledgments................................................................................................................... 8 List of Figures Figure 1 Timeline of significant discoveries
    [Show full text]
  • Absolute Zero, Absolute Temperature. Absolute Zero Is the Lowest
    Contents Radioactivity: The First Puzzles................................................ 1 The “Uranic Rays” of Henri Becquerel .......................................... 1 The Discovery ............................................................... 2 Is It Really Phosphorescence? .............................................. 4 What Is the Nature of the Radiation?....................................... 5 A Limited Impact on Scientists and the Public ............................ 6 Why 1896? .................................................................. 7 Was Radioactivity Discovered by Chance? ................................ 7 Polonium and Radium............................................................. 9 Marya Skłodowska .......................................................... 9 Pierre Curie .................................................................. 10 Polonium and Radium: Pierre and Marie Curie Invent Radiochemistry.. 11 Enigmas...................................................................... 14 Emanation from Thorium ......................................................... 17 Ernest Rutherford ........................................................... 17 Rutherford Studies Radioactivity: ˛-and ˇ-Rays.......................... 18 ˇ-Rays Are Electrons ....................................................... 19 Rutherford in Montreal: The Radiation of Thorium, the Exponential Decrease........................................... 19 “Induced” and “Excited” Radioactivity .................................... 20 Elster
    [Show full text]
  • Outcomes for Australian Graduates in Physics Thermal Plasmas
    Volume 50, Number 3, May–Jun 2013 OUTCOMES FOR AUSTRALIAN GRADUATES IN THERMAL PHYSICS PLASMAS Special Promotion! Buy a spectrometer and CCD, and get a free IR detector! Purchase an imaging spectrometer and one of our CCD detectors, and we will include a single-channel InGaAs detector at no additional cost. This package will allow you to easily cover a range from the UV (200 nm) to near-IR (1700 nm)! Ask for a quotation today! Lastek Pty Ltd Thebarton Campus, University of Adelaide 10 Reid Street, Thebarton SA 5031 Australia [email protected] [email protected] Phone: 08 8443 8668 Fax: 08 8443 8427 CONTENTS 78 Editorial Australian Institute of Physics Vale Tony Farmer Volume 50, Number 3, May–Jun 2013 Promoting the role of physics in research, education, industry and the community 79 President’s Column AIP website: www.aip.org.au Tough times: Mourning the loss AIP Executive of friends and preparing for the President Dr Robert Robinson [email protected] September Federal Election Vice President Prof Warrick Couch [email protected] Secretary Dr Joe Hope [email protected] 80 News & Comment Treasurer Dr Judith Pollard [email protected] New CEO for Science and OUTCOMES FOR AUSTRALIAN Registrar Prof Ian McArthur Technology Australia GRADUATES IN THERMAL PHYSICS PLASMAS [email protected] Woman of the Year award to Dr Immediate Past President Dr Marc Duldig Cathy Foley Cover [email protected] ANSTO: 60 year of nuclear An arc in a mixture of helium and Special Projects Officers argon; the helium, which appears pink, Dr Olivia Samardzic innovation becomes concentrated in the centre due [email protected] NMI Award for 2013 to demixing.
    [Show full text]