"HERACLES Preparing Human Exploration by Integrated Certification of Crew and Hardware for Lunar Surface Operations”

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

"HERACLES Preparing Human Exploration by Integrated Certification of Crew and Hardware for Lunar Surface Operations” Markus Landgraf ESA/ESTEC Future In-Space Operations Telecon 06/04/2016 ESA UNCLASSIFIEDESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official – for Use official use CONTEXT The Global Exploration Roadmap August 2013 → EXPLORING TOGETHER ESA Space Exploration Strategy HERACLES ESA UNCLASSIFIED – for official use Slide 2 A Long-Range Human Exploration Strategy CONTEXT ISECG Mission Scenario 2020 2030 Low-Earth Orbit International Space Station Robotic Mission Commercial or Government-Owned Platforms Human Mission Beyond Low-Earth Orbit Cargo Mission Test Missions Asteroid Redirection Rosetta Hayabusa2 OSIRIS-REx (Sample Return) (Sample Return) Explore Near-Earth Asteroid Near-Earth Objects Apophis Extended Staging Post for Crew Duration Lunar Vicinity to Lunar Surface Crew Potential Commercial Opportunities Missions LADEE Luna 25 Luna 26 Luna 27 RESOLVE SELENE-2 Luna 28/29 SELENE-3 Human-Assisted Humans to Lunar Surface Chandrayaan-2 (Sample Return) Sample Return Moon Potential Commercial Opportunities Human-Assisted Sample Return Sustainable Human MAVEN ISRO Mars ExoMars InSight ExoMars Mars JAXA Mars Sample Return Mission Missions to the Orbiter Mission 2016 2018 2020 Mars Opportunities Mars System Mars Precursor Human Scale EDL Test Mission Opportunities Multi-Destination Small Human Transportation Initial Cargo Surface Cargo Lander Mobility Capabilities Delivery (Planned and Conceptual) Evolvable Orion Russian Advanced Deep Space Orion Crewed Orion Icon indicates frst use opportunity. & Piloted Electric Habitat & SLS Lunar & SLS Commercial/institutional launchers not shown. SLS System Propulsion (Upgrade) Lander (Upgrade) ESA UNCLASSIFIED – for official use Slide 3 4 MISSION STATEMENT “The Human-Enhanced Robotic Architecture and Capability for Lunar Exploration and Science (HERACLES) is to establish the elements and capabilities for sustainable human exploration of the Moon and human- robotic exploration of Mars while maximising opportunities for unprecedented scientific knowledge gain” ESA UNCLASSIFIED – for official use Slide 4 MISSION OBJECTIVES • Achieve human rating of critical subsystems of a lunar lander by flight test: • ascent and descent engine • autonomous GNC for descent, landing, ascent, and rendezvous • Provide opportunities for crew certification • surface mobility operations • surface landing operations • Advance understanding of ISRU by • sample return • deployment of a pilot plant • Provide opportunities for scientific research • sample return • in situ investigation • Prepare international partnership for roles in lunar surface exploration ESA UNCLASSIFIED – for official use Slide 5 BASIC ARCHITECTURE ELEMENTS Sample Container Lunar Ascent Element Mass: 25 kg Dry mass: 600 kg Samples: up to 15kg Wet mass: 1,300 kg Cryo-Samples: 1kg Thrust: 6kN Cryo temperature: -140 °C Lunar Descent Element Dry mass: 1,800 kg Rover Wet mass: 8,700 kg Mass: 500 kg Thrust: 30 kN Speed: 5 km/h Lifetime: 2y Communication: 10 Mbps Robotics: 2 arms Night survival Eclipse operations Ground and orbit crew control ESA UNCLASSIFIED – for official use Slide 6 REFERENCE SCENARIO – HERACLES (1/3) ESA UNCLASSIFIED – for official use Slide 7 REFERENCE SCENARIO – HERACLES (2/3) ESA UNCLASSIFIED – for official use Slide 8 REFERENCE SCENARIO – HERACLES (3/3 REUSE) ESA UNCLASSIFIED – for official use Slide 9 REFERENCE SCENARIO – HERACLES (3/3 NON- REUSE) ESA UNCLASSIFIED – for official use Slide 10 TOP-LEVEL HERACLES OPERATIONAL CONCEPT • Detailed coordinated (ESA & international partners) ConOps available • Coordinated Surface Campaign Description Document available (performance wrt. exploration and science objectives in agenda point 3) • Based on exploitation of cis-lunar infrastructure: eDSH and Orion • Crew role in sample return and vehicle control is essential element • Flexibility in operational authority: autonomous systems, ground crew, orbital crew è optimum tele-ops approach as per METERON test plan (agenda point 2) • Extended duration operations for reusable elements: ascent stage and rover • Multiple surface missions mimicking human architecture • N x 70d for lunar module (= DNDND = 5x14) • 2 y for rover ESA UNCLASSIFIED – for official use Slide 11 Medium TraverseEXAMPLE LANDING SITE: SCHRÖDINGER Pyroclastic Inter-peak ring Smooth inner-peak ring Peak ring Secondary Slump craters Smooth outer-peak ring Smooth hummocky floor Basin wall Basin diameter ~320 km ESA UNCLASSIFIED – for official use Slide 12 • INSPIRATIONAL “FIRSTS” 1. First soft landing south of 41°S 2. First soft landing Pole-ward of 45° latitude 3. First return of samples outside the KREEP region 4. First landing on the far side 5. First equipment surviving lunar night 6. First rover tele-operated by orbital crew 7. First sample delivery to orbital station 8. First assembly of lunar lander in orbit 9. First return of SPA samples 10. First return of PSR samples 11. First cryogenic sample return 12. First reuse of lunar ascent stage 13. First rover to visit more than one landing sites 14. First production of oxygen from lunar regolith 15. First climb of lunar mountain by rover 16. First lander tele-operated by orbital crew ESA UNCLASSIFIED – for official use Slide 13 THANK YOU ! ESA UNCLASSIFIED – for official use .
Recommended publications
  • The Surface Operations Framework – Transitioning from Early Analogue Experiments to Future Lunar Missions
    THE SURFACE OPERATIONS FRAMEWORK – TRANSITIONING FROM EARLY ANALOGUE EXPERIMENTS TO FUTURE LUNAR MISSIONS Sebastian Martin(1), Toril Bye Rinnan(2), Mehran Sarkarati(3), Kim Nergaard(4) (1) ESA/ESOC, Robert-Bosch-Straße 5, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany, Email: [email protected] (2) Solenix Deutschland GmbH, Spreestraße 3, 64295 Darmstadt, Germany, Email: [email protected] (3) ESA/ESOC, Robert-Bosch-Straße 5, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany, Email: [email protected] (4) ESA/ESOC, Robert-Bosch-Straße 5, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany, Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT to assess the financial and technical feasibility of new mission concepts, technologies and studies before This paper provides an overview of a family of possibly advancing them to the next phases of activities performed within the European Space implementation of a mission. Operations Centre (ESOC) to prepare for future robotic As the result of one such concurrent design study in missions on the lunar surface and beyond. 2009, the METERON concept was created. METERON – the Multi-purpose End-To-End Robotics Operations Over the course of nearly a decade, ESOC has been Network – was initiated to prepare for future human and gradually building up expertise for future surface robotic exploration scenarios. These future scenarios operations activities. foresee robotic assets controlled on the surface of Moon This paper describes or Mars, with humans operating those assets from an - the activities and corresponding systems prepared orbiting vehicle or by Earth ground control. The benefit from the ground up before concrete missions were of near real-time remote asset operations is to reduce defined, human risks and cost by not having to land humans and - how we are now covering a range of activities return them from the surface, while still being able to where we have requirements from missions in the control robotic assets with short transmission delays definition phases while continuing to build on from an orbiter.
    [Show full text]
  • ESA Strategy for Science at the Moon
    ESA UNCLASSIFIED - Releasable to the Public ESA Strategy for Science at the Moon ESA UNCLASSIFIED - Releasable to the Public EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A new era of space exploration is beginning, with multiple international and private sector actors engaged and with the Moon as its cornerstone. This renaissance in lunar exploration will offer new opportunities for science across a multitude of disciplines from planetary geology to astronomy and astrobiology whilst preparing the knowledge humanity will need to explore further into the Solar System. Recent missions and new analyses of samples retrieved during Apollo have transformed our understanding of the Moon and the science that can be performed there. We now understand the scientific importance of further exploration of the Moon to understand the origins and evolution of Earth and the cosmic context of life’s emergence on Earth and our future in space. ESA’s priorities for scientific activities at the Moon in the next ten years are: • Analysis of new and diverse samples from the Moon. • Detection and characterisation of polar water ice and other lunar volatiles. • Deployment of geophysical instruments and the build up a global geophysical network. • Identification and characterisation of potential resources for future exploration. • Deployment long wavelength radio astronomy receivers on the lunar far side. • Characterisation of the dynamic dust, charge and plasma environment. • Characterisation of biological sensitivity to the lunar environment. ESA UNCLASSIFIED - Releasable to the Public
    [Show full text]
  • Global Exploration Roadmap
    The Global Exploration Roadmap January 2018 What is New in The Global Exploration Roadmap? This new edition of the Global Exploration robotic space exploration. Refinements in important role in sustainable human space Roadmap reaffirms the interest of 14 space this edition include: exploration. Initially, it supports human and agencies to expand human presence into the robotic lunar exploration in a manner which Solar System, with the surface of Mars as • A summary of the benefits stemming from creates opportunities for multiple sectors to a common driving goal. It reflects a coordi- space exploration. Numerous benefits will advance key goals. nated international effort to prepare for space come from this exciting endeavour. It is • The recognition of the growing private exploration missions beginning with the Inter- important that mission objectives reflect this sector interest in space exploration. national Space Station (ISS) and continuing priority when planning exploration missions. Interest from the private sector is already to the lunar vicinity, the lunar surface, then • The important role of science and knowl- transforming the future of low Earth orbit, on to Mars. The expanded group of agencies edge gain. Open interaction with the creating new opportunities as space agen- demonstrates the growing interest in space international science community helped cies look to expand human presence into exploration and the importance of coopera- identify specific scientific opportunities the Solar System. Growing capability and tion to realise individual and common goals created by the presence of humans and interest from the private sector indicate and objectives. their infrastructure as they explore the Solar a future for collaboration not only among System.
    [Show full text]
  • AAS SFMC Manuscript Format Template
    (Preprint) AAS 18-344 REFINED MISSION ANALYSIS FOR HERACLES – A ROBOTIC LUNAR SURFACE SAMPLE RETURN MISSION UTILIZING HUMAN INFRASTRUCTURE Dr.-Ing. Florian Renk,* Dr. rer. nat. Markus Landgraf,† and Lorenzo Bucci‡ In the frame of the International Space Exploration Coordination Working Group the European Space Agency is participating in the planning of future ex- ploration architectures. The mission concept for the robotic lander mission (Human Enhanced Robotic Architecture and Capability for Lunar Exploration and Science – HERACLES) has matured meanwhile. The mission aims for a human assisted sample return from the lunar surface, while at the same time providing a qualification opportunity for technologies required for a crewed lu- nar lander. Human spaceflight rating is required for parts of the mission, since the sample return shall not be via a direct return trajectory, but the samples shall be transported via Orion, and thus docking of the robotic lander to the LOP-G will be required. This paper shall provide an update on the current mission de- sign as agreed between the international partners and the associated mission analysis as all the intermediate and final orbits have been selected for the base- line. The implications of the design decision as well as some alternatives that can serve as a backup scenario will be presented as well. The paper will first present the baseline mission sequence and will then focus on aspects of particu- lar interest as e.g. the strong limitation in the launch window design and the ren- dezvous and docking strategy. INTRODUCTION HERACLES is intended as a human-robotic architecture in the frame of preparations for hu- man exploration activities on the lunar surface.
    [Show full text]
  • SKA-Athena Synergy White Paper
    SKA-Athena Synergy White Paper SKA-Athena Synergy Team July 2018. Edited by: Francisco J. Carrera and Silvia Martínez-Núñez on behalf of the Athena Community Office. Revisions provided by: Judith Croston, Andrew C. Fabian, Robert Laing, Didier Barret, Robert Braun, Kirpal Nandra Authorship Authors Rossella Cassano (INAF-Istituto di Radioastronomia, Italy). • Rob Fender (University of Oxford, United Kingdom). • Chiara Ferrari (Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, France). • Andrea Merloni (Max-Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Germany). • Contributors Takuya Akahori (Kagoshima University, Japan). • Hiroki Akamatsu (SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, The Netherlands). • Yago Ascasibar (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain). • David Ballantyne (Georgia Institute of Technology, United States). • Gianfranco Brunetti (INAF-Istituto di Radioastronomia, Italy) and Maxim Markevitch (NASA-Goddard • Space Flight Center, United States). Judith Croston (The Open University, United Kingdom). • Imma Donnarumma (Agenzia Spaziale Italiana, Italy) and E. M. Rossi (Leiden Observatory, The • Netherlands). Robert Ferdman (University of East Anglia, United Kingdom) on behalf of the SKA Pulsar Science • Working Group. Luigina Feretti (INAF-Istituto di Radioastronomia, Italy) and Federica Govoni (INAF Osservatorio • Astronomico,Italy). Jan Forbrich (University of Hertfordshire, United Kingdom). • Giancarlo Ghirlanda (INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera and University Milano Bicocca, Italy). • Adriano Ingallinera (INAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di Catania, Italy). • Andrei Mesinger (Scuola Normale Superiore, Italy). • Vanessa Moss and Elaine Sadler (Sydney Institute for Astronomy/CAASTRO and University of Sydney, • Australia). Fabrizio Nicastro (Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma,Italy), Edvige Corbelli (INAF-Osservatorio As- • trofisico di Arcetri, Italy) and Luigi Piro (INAF, Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali, Italy). Paolo Padovani (European Southern Observatory, Germany). • Francesca Panessa (INAF/Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali, Italy).
    [Show full text]
  • A Collection of Curricula for the STARLAB Greek Mythology Cylinder
    A Collection of Curricula for the STARLAB Greek Mythology Cylinder Including: A Look at the Greek Mythology Cylinder Three Activities: Constellation Creations, Create a Myth, I'm Getting Dizzy by Gary D. Kratzer ©2008 by Science First/STARLAB, 95 Botsford Place, Buffalo, NY 14216. www.starlab.com. All rights reserved. Curriculum Guide Contents A Look at the Greek Mythology Cylinder ...................3 Leo, the Lion .....................................................9 Introduction ......................................................3 Lepus, the Hare .................................................9 Andromeda ......................................................3 Libra, the Scales ................................................9 Aquarius ..........................................................3 Lyra, the Lyre ...................................................10 Aquila, the Eagle ..............................................3 Ophuichus, Serpent Holder ..............................10 Aries, the Ram ..................................................3 Orion, the Hunter ............................................10 Auriga .............................................................4 Pegasus, the Winged Horse..............................11 Bootes ..............................................................4 Perseus, the Champion .....................................11 Cancer, the Crab ..............................................4 Phoenix ..........................................................11 Canis Major, the Big Dog
    [Show full text]
  • Forward to the Moon with HERACLES
    EPSC Abstracts Vol. 13, EPSC-DPS2019-1848-1, 2019 EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC Attribution 4.0 license. Forward to the Moon with HERACLES M. Landgraf (1), Shahrzad Hosseini (1), Nick Gollins (1), and H. Hiesinger (s) (1) ESA/ESTEC, Keplerlaan 1, 2201 AZ Noordwijk, The Netherlands, (2) Institut für Planetologie, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Wilhelm-Klemm-Str. 10, 48149 Münster, Germany (hiesinger@uni- muenster.de) Abstract knowledge, particularly on potential resources; and (4) Create opportunities to demonstrate and test In the context of an accelerated lunar exploration technologies and operational procedures for future agenda on international level, ESA is ingaging with Mars missions. HERACLES will consist of the Lunar international partners to enable European roles in the Descent Element (LDE, JAXA), the ESA-built near and mid term. While in the near term Interface Element that will house the 330 kg opportunities exist in “boots-on-the-ground” human Canadian rover, and the Lunar Ascent Element (LAE, lunar return, ESA continues to prepare the next step ESA) that will return the samples to the lunar in sustainability with the HERACLES (Human- Gateway. The rover will be powered by radioisotope Enhanced Robotic Architecture and Capability in batteries that will allow for driving more than 100 km Lunar Exploration and Science): reusability of lunar and surviving the lunar night. The rover will be vehicles, survival of the cold, dark lunar night, partly operated from astronauts on the lunar Gateway mobility, and resource prospecting. while it will be operated for most of the time from Earth. Once landed on the lunar surface, the rover will immediately collect a contingency sample and 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Are There Seven Sisters?
    Why are there Seven Sisters? Ray P. Norris1,2 & Barnaby R. M. Norris3,4,5 1 Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South, NSW 1797, Australia 2 CSIRO Astronomy & Space Science, PO Box 76, Epping, NSW 1710, Australia 3 Sydney Institute for Astronomy, School of Physics, Physics Road, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia 4 Sydney Astrophotonic Instrumentation Laboratories, Physics Road, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia 5 AAO-USyd, School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia Abstract of six stars arranged symmetrically around a seventh, and is There are two puzzles surrounding the therefore probably symbolic rather than a literal picture of Pleiades, or Seven Sisters. First, why are the Pleiades. the mythological stories surrounding them, In Greek mythology, the Seven Sisters are named after typically involving seven young girls be- the Pleiades, who were the daughters of Atlas and Pleione. ing chased by a man associated with the Their father, Atlas, was forced to hold up the sky, and was constellation Orion, so similar in vastly sep- therefore unable to protect his daughters. But to save them arated cultures, such as the Australian Abo- from being raped by Orion the hunter, Zeus transformed them riginal cultures and Greek mythology? Sec- into stars. Orion was the son of Poseidon, the King of the sea, ond, why do most cultures call them “Seven and a Cretan princess. Orion first appears in ancient Greek Sisters" even though most people with good calendars (e.g. Planeaux , 2006), but by the late eighth to eyesight see only six stars? Here we show that both these puzzles may be explained by early seventh centuries BC, he is said to be making unwanted a combination of the great antiquity of the advances on the Pleiades (Hesiod, Works and Days, 618-623).
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Examination of the Lunar Sample Return Mission “Heracles”
    50th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2019 (LPI Contrib. No. 2132) 1736.pdf SCIENTIFIC EXAMINATION OF THE LUNAR SAMPLE RETURN MISSION “HERACLES”. Y. Karouji1, H. Hiesinger2, M. Landgraf3, W. Carrey3, T. Haltigin4, G. R. Osinski5, U. Mall6, K. Hashizume7, H. Nagaoka8, N. Hasebe9, Y. Ogawa10, T. Yada8, S. Yamamoto11, Y. Ishihara12, M. Kayama13, M. Abe8, J. Haruyama8, M. Ohtake8, HERACLES Science Working Group, HERACLES International Science Definition Team; 1Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), JAXA Space Exploration Center, 3-1-1 Yoshinodai, Chuo-ku, Sagaminara-shi, Kana- gawa, 252-5210, Japan ([email protected]), 2Institut für Planetologie, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, 3European Space Agency (ESA), Directorate of Human Spaceflight and Robotic Exploration Programmes, 4Canadian Space Agency (CSA), 5University of Western Ontario, Centre for Planetary Science and Exploration, 6Max-Planck Institut für Sonnensystemforschung, 7Ibaraki University, Dept. of Earth Science, 8Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), 9Waseda University, Research Institute for Science and Engineering,10University of Aizu, ARC-Space/CAIST, 11Japan Space Systems, Earth Re- mote Sensing Department, 12National Institute for Environmental Studies, Satellite Observation Center, Center for Global Environmental Research, 13Tohoku University, Department of Earth and Planetary Materials Science, Gradu- ate School of Science. Introduction: The HERACLES (Human-Enhanced Robotic Architecture and Capability
    [Show full text]
  • Mecoptera: Meropeidae): Simply Dull Or Just Inscrutable?
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida 8-24-2007 Etymology of the earwigfly, Merope tuber Newman (Mecoptera: Meropeidae): Simply dull or just inscrutable? Louis A. Somma University of Florida, [email protected] James C. Dunford University of Florida, Gainesville, FL Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Somma, Louis A. and Dunford, James C., "Etymology of the earwigfly, Merope tuber Newman (Mecoptera: Meropeidae): Simply dull or just inscrutable?" (2007). Insecta Mundi. 65. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/65 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI A Journal of World Insect Systematics 0013 Etymology of the earwigfly, Merope tuber Newman (Mecoptera: Meropeidae): Simply dull or just inscrutable? Louis A. Somma Department of Zoology PO Box 118525 University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611-8525 [email protected] James C. Dunford Department of Entomology and Nematology PO Box 110620, IFAS University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611-0620 [email protected] Date of Issue: August 24, 2007 CENTER FOR SYSTEMATIC ENTOMOLOGY, INC., Gainesville, FL Louis A. Somma and James C. Dunford Etymology of the earwigfly, Merope tuber Newman (Mecoptera: Meropeidae): Simply dull or just inscrutable? Insecta Mundi 0013: 1-5 Published in 2007 by Center for Systematic Entomology, Inc. P. O. Box 147100 Gainesville, FL 32604-7100 U.
    [Show full text]
  • JAXA's Lunar Exploration Activities
    June 17th 2019, 62nd Session of COPUOS, Vienna JAXA’s Lunar Exploration Activities Hiroshi Sasaki Director, JAXA Space Exploration Center (JSEC) Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency 1 JAXA’s Space Exploration Scenario Mars, others Activities on/beyond Mars ©JAXA MMX JFY2024 Kaguya ©JAXA ©JAXA ©JAXA ©JAXA Moon SLIM Lunar Polar Exploration Robotic Sample Return Pinpoint Landing Water Prospecting Sustainable JFY2021 (HERACLES) prox.2023- Technology Demo Exploration/Utilization Approx.2026- HTV-X derivatives Gateway Approx. 2026- Operation OMOTENASHI EQUULEUS CubeSat Innovative launched by small mission Gateway (construction phase) SLS/EM1 2022- Earth Promote Commercialization International Space Station 2 ©NASA International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG): • ISECG is a non-political agency coordination forum of space organization from 18 countries and regions. • JAXA is currently the chair of ISECG. • ISECG agencies work collectively in a non-binding, consensus-driven manner towards advancing the Global Exploration Strategy. The Global Exploration Roadmap (GER3) recognizes the importance of increasing synergies with robotic missions while demonstrating the role humans play in realizing societal benefits. GER3, released in January 2018 3 Significance of Lunar Exploration Expand Human Activities Gain Knowledge International Cooperation ©NASA Promote Industry Inspire Young Generation 4 JAXA’s Lunar Exploration Roadmap (Long-Team) Lunar Base (International Space Agency, Private Sector) 2060- Sustainable Exploration (Private Utilization)
    [Show full text]
  • The Pleiades: the Celestial Herd of Ancient Timekeepers
    The Pleiades: the celestial herd of ancient timekeepers. Amelia Sparavigna Dipartimento di Fisica, Politecnico di Torino C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24, Torino, Italy Abstract In the ancient Egypt seven goddesses, represented by seven cows, composed the celestial herd that provides the nourishment to her worshippers. This herd is observed in the sky as a group of stars, the Pleiades, close to Aldebaran, the main star in the Taurus constellation. For many ancient populations, Pleiades were relevant stars and their rising was marked as a special time of the year. In this paper, we will discuss the presence of these stars in ancient cultures. Moreover, we will report some results of archeoastronomy on the role for timekeeping of these stars, results which show that for hunter-gatherers at Palaeolithic times, they were linked to the seasonal cycles of aurochs. 1. Introduction Archeoastronomy studies astronomical practices and related mythologies of the ancient cultures, to understand how past peoples observed and used the celestial phenomena and what was the role played by the sky in their cultures. This discipline is then a branch of the cultural astronomy, an interdisciplinary field that relates astronomical phenomena to current and ancient cultures. It must then be distinguished from the history of astronomy, because astronomy is a culturally specific concept and ancient peoples may have been related to the sky in different way [1,2]. Archeoastronomy is considered as a quite new interdisciplinary science, rooted in the Stonehenge studies of 1960s by the astronomer Gerald Hawkins, who tested Stonehenge alignments by computer, and concluded that these stones marked key dates in the megalithic calendar [3].
    [Show full text]