The Life of Dr. George Bull, Lord Bishop of St

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Life of Dr. George Bull, Lord Bishop of St This is a reproduction of a library book that was digitized by Google as part of an ongoing effort to preserve the information in books and make it universally accessible. http://books.google.com i NIVERSSTY OF MICHIGAN LIBRARIES jw: V "\ THE LIFE OF DR. GEORGE BULL, LORD BISHOP OF ST. DAVIDS. THE LIFE OF DR. GEORGE BULL, LORD BISHOP OF ST. DAVID'S; WITH THE HISTORY OF THOSE CONTROVERSIES IN WHICH HE WAS ENGAGED : AND AN ABSTRACT OF THOSE FUNDAMENTAL DOCTRINES Which he maintained and defended in the Latin tongue. BY OBERT NELSON, Esq. A NEW EDITION. OXFORD, PRINTED BY W. BAXTER ; FOR J. PARKER : AND LAW AND WHITTAKER J AND OGLES, DUNCAN, AND COCHRAN, LONDON. 1816. 5'< /<?<? » .»**> I Bib l&stte-fio CONTENTS. INTRODUCTION. -I HE occasion of writing the Life, p. 1. An apology for attempting it, ibid. His own reputation secured by his works, 2. Why it may be acceptable to learned and good men, 3. Reasons for the length of it, 4. I. When and where Mr. Bull was born, 5. His family and parentage, ibid. Early dedicated to the service of the church, 6. II. Educated at Tiverton school in Devonshire, 7. An ac count and character of his master, 8. His great and early progress in classic learning, ibid. III. Removed to Exeter college in Oxford, 9. Taken notice of by two great men, 10. Acquainted with Mr. Clifford, afterwards Lord High Treasurer, 11. IV. He retires from Oxford, upon refusing the Engagement, 12. He goes with his tutor, Mr. Ackland, to North- Cadbury, 13. Influenced to great seriousness by a sister, 14. V. He puts himself under the conduct of an eminent divine, 15. The advantage of seminaries for the candidates of holy Orders, ibid. The fruit to be reaped from them, 1 6. He is put under the direction of Mr. Thomas, 17- He contracts a friendship with Mr. Thomas's son, which was very advantageous to him, 1 8. VI. He enters into holy Orders, 20. He was but one and twenty when ordained Priest, 21. His forwardness in such times an argument of his zeal, 22. ri CONTENTS. VII. He settles at St. George's near Bristol, 23. A little accident which contributed to his reputation, 24. Dis turbed in his Sermon by a Quaker, 25. VIII. The method he took in governing his parish, 27. The parish infested with Antinomian books, 29. The excel lency of Mr. Bull's method, 30. IX. The prayers he used in public, 31 . An instance of the Common-Prayer being admired by the dissenters when used by Mr. Bull, ibid. An eminent danger he was pre served from, 32. He goes to Oxford once a year for the use of libraries, 33. X. Mr. Bull marries Mrs. Bridget Gregory, 35. Her. cha racter, 36'. XI. He was presented to Suddington St. Mary's, 38. He was made privy to the design of a general insurrection in fifty-nine, 39. His preaching at Cirencester, and the occasion of it, 40. XII. He was presented to the vicarage of Suddington St. Peter, 41. He marries a couple publicly by the form of Common-Prayer, 43. Reading the prayers devoutly no . mean attainment, and of great advantage to the people, 44. XIII. His manner of preaching, and the frequency of it, 45. • He only writ the scheme of his sermons, 47. His care in catechising the youth, 48. Baptism and the Eucharist how administered by him, 49. His observation of the holy-days of the Church, 50. XIV. The religious government of his family, 52. His private devotions, 55. The pious frame and temper of his mind, 56. His singing of Psalms in his private de votions, 57. The singing of Psalms of the old version defended by Bishop Beveridge, 58. The character of his sermons, 59. XV. Mr. Bull's manner of governing this parish, 61. He confirms two ladies that were wavering in their religion, 63. A ridiculous story of a Quaker's challenge, 64. His charity to the poor and indigent, ibid. His sentiments upon charity, 65. XVI. His only diversion agreeable conversation, 67. He CONTENTS. vii prosecutes his studies with great application, 68. Several tracts composed by him lost, 69. XVII. He published his first book, called Harmonia Apo- stolica, fyc. 71. An account of this book, 72. The causes and motives of his writing it, 73. A particular obligation laid upon him to consider this controversy, 74. His preparation for writing it, ibid. The method he took in collecting materials, 75. How he came to write in Latin, ibid. • XVIII. The general scope and design of this treatise, 76. His great caution in treating this point of justification, ibid. The dissatisfaction of some Protestant divines here upon, 77. The occasion and grounds of this dissatisfac tion, 78. The judgment of the Church of England va riously represented, ibid. The effect which this conten tion produced, 79. The advantage by it to Mr. Bull's cause, ibid. XIX. Animadversions upon his book, 80. The opposition it met with from three considerable men in the church, 81. And from others, either half-conformists, or non conformists, 82. XX. A review of his method for determining the sense of St. James, 83. The proposition of St. James farther ex plained, 84. This explication vindicated by five several arguments, ibid. XXI. Argument the first, from the testimony of holy Scrip ture, 84. XXII. Argument the second, from the juridical notion of justification, 88. Argument the third, from the notion and nature of faith, 89. XXIII. Argument the fourth, from God's proceeding in the day of judgment, 90. Argument the fifth, from the concession of adversaries, 93. XXIV. The first concession, concerning a living or ope rative faith, 94. Second concession, concerning the neces sity of good works to salvation, 95. An objection an swered, 97- ' XXV. The proposition of St. James demonstrated to ac- rHi CONTENTS. cord with the sense of St. Paul, 97. He shews both the false and true way of solving the difficulty, 98. How the term justification, as used by St. Paul, is to be inter preted, ibid. How the term faith, in this controversy, is to be interpreted, 99. First argument, that St. Paul meaneth such a faith as implies obedience, ibid. Second argument, that St. Paul means such a faith as containeth obedience, 101. Third argument, that St. Paul meaneth such a faith as containeth obedience, 102. The ground of this manner of speaking, 103. XXVI. The first reason, why St Paul useth faith to de scribe the condition required from us, 104. The second reason, why faith is used to express evangelical obedi ence, 106. XXVII. How the term works is to be interpreted in this controversy, 107. Works wrought by the Spirit to be distinguished from all other works, ibid. Faith and works constitute the Gospel-covenant, 108. All sort of works not excluded from justification, ibid. What sort of works rejected from justification, 109. XXVIII. Animadversions on the Harmonia sent to the author, 110. The Animadversions written by Mr^ Charles Gatakerr 111. The sum of the Animadversions, 111 — 115. The character of the animadverter, 115. XXIX. Mr. Bull's motive for taking so much notice of Mr. Gataker's manuscript Animadversions, 116. An abstract of his Examen Censurce, in answer to them, 117— 125. XXX. Some farther observations of Mr. Gataker's ma nagement of this controversy, 12.5. A reflection of Mr. Bull's management of it against him, 127- An account of the eldest Gataker, and how Mr. Bull came to be en gaged with him, 128. XXXI. The occasion and motives of Mr. Truman's writ ing' against the Harmonia, 129. His censure, how differ ent from that of Mr. Gataker, and how favourable to Mr. Bull, 131. How he agreed and disagreed with Mr. Bull, ibid. How some concurred with him in the very offence CONTENTS. ix taken, for whom Mr. Bull had otherwise an esteem, 132. How he came to write against Mr. Bull in English rather than in Latin, 134. XXXII. An account of the several treatises published by him against the doctrine and method of Mr. Bull, 136. An account of the design and method of his last treatise, 1*0. Principal mistakes charged upon Mr. Bull, p. 4, and Pref. p. S. 141. XXXIII. The principles of Mr. Truman opposite to these, 142. His interpretation of the threats and promises of the Old Testament, with a fourfold respect, 14*. His opinion of the Horeb covenant, and that made in the land of Moab, 145. His sentiments concerning the nature of the Mosaic law, ibid. His commendation of Mr. Bull, and agreement with him in some material points, 148. XXXIV. His dissatisfaction, both with Dr. Hammond and Mr. Bull, about their notions of grace, 149. Some other objections raised against Mr. Bull, 153. Some of Mr. Truman's concessions, 154. The result of the whole matter, ibid. XXXV. Mr. Bull answereth him in English, 156. But not contented with that, answereth him in Latin, 157. The substance of his answer, 158. XXXVI. An hypothesis of Mr. Truman's examined, 160. The character of the rectifier, 1 63. XXXVII. Bishop Nicholson, Mr. Bull's patron, dies; his character, 164. Bishop Nicholson's Epitaph writ by Mr. Bull, 165. How a stop was put to Mr. Bull's de signs of vindicating some Catholic doctrines, 167. How public lectures were read against him at Oxford, 169. XXXVIII. How Dr. Tully became Dr. Barlow's second against Mr. Bull, 170.
Recommended publications
  • The Church Militant: the American Loyalist Clergy and the Making of the British Counterrevolution, 1701-92
    The Church Militant: The American Loyalist Clergy and the Making of the British Counterrevolution, 1701-92 Peter W. Walker Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2016 © 2016 Peter Walker All rights reserved ABSTRACT The Church Militant: The American Loyalist Clergy and the Making of the British Counterrevolution, 1701-92 Peter W. Walker This dissertation is a study of the loyalist Church of England clergy in the American Revolution. By reconstructing the experience and identity of this largely-misunderstood group, it sheds light on the relationship between church and empire, the role of religious pluralism and toleration in the American Revolution, the dynamics of loyalist politics, and the religious impact of the American Revolution on Britain. It is based primarily on the loyalist clergy’s own correspondence and writings, the records of the American Loyalist Claims Commission, and the archives of the SPG (the Church of England’s missionary arm). The study focuses on the New England and Mid-Atlantic colonies, where Anglicans formed a religious minority and where their clergy were overwhelmingly loyalist. It begins with the founding of the SPG in 1701 and its first forays into America. It then examines the state of religious pluralism and toleration in New England, the polarising contest over the proposed creation of an American bishop after the Seven Years’ War, and the role of the loyalist clergy in the Revolutionary War itself, focusing particularly on conflicts occasioned by the Anglican liturgy and Book of Common Prayer.
    [Show full text]
  • Donald Macleod God Or God?: Arianism, Ancient and Modern
    Donald Macleod God or god?: Arianism, Ancient and Modern Ancient heresies have a habit of recurring in the Christian church. Although this article deals with eighteenth century tendencies, it may help to alert readers to the danger of compamble phenomena in contempomry theology and their effects on the teaching of the church. Beliefin the Dei1y ofJesus Christ is well waITanted by the canonical scriptures of the Christian church. When we move, however, from exegesis and biblical theology to the realm of systematic reflection we soon find ourselves struggling. The statement ~esus Christ is God' (or 'any statement linking such a subject to such a predicate) raises enormous problems. What is the relation of Christ as God to God the Father? And what is his relation to the divine nature? These questions were raised in an acute form by the Arian controversy of the 4th century. The church gave what it hoped were definitive answers in the Nicene Creed of 325 and the Nicaeno­ Constantinopolitan Creed of 381, but, despite these, Arianism persisted long after the death of the heresiarch. This article looks briefly at 4th century developments, but focuses mainly on later British Arianism, particularly the views of the great Evangelical leaders, Isaac Watts and Philip Doddridge. Arius It is a commonplace that history has been unkind to heretics. In the case of such men as Praxeas and Pelagius we know virtually nothing of their teaching except what we can glean from the voluminous writings of their opponents (notably Tertullian and Augustine). Arius (probably born in Libya around 256, died 336) is in little better case.
    [Show full text]
  • Recusant Literature Benjamin Charles Watson University of San Francisco, [email protected]
    The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center Gleeson Library Librarians Research Gleeson Library | Geschke Center 2003 Recusant Literature Benjamin Charles Watson University of San Francisco, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.usfca.edu/librarian Part of the English Language and Literature Commons, European Languages and Societies Commons, History Commons, Library and Information Science Commons, and the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Watson, Benjamin Charles, "Recusant Literature" (2003). Gleeson Library Librarians Research. Paper 2. http://repository.usfca.edu/librarian/2 This Bibliography is brought to you for free and open access by the Gleeson Library | Geschke Center at USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Gleeson Library Librarians Research by an authorized administrator of USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RECUSANT LITERATURE Description of USF collections by and about Catholics in England during the period of the Penal Laws, beginning with the the accession of Elizabeth I in 1558 and continuing until the Catholic Relief Act of 1791, with special emphasis on the Jesuit presence throughout these two centuries of religious and political conflict. Introduction The unpopular English Catholic Queen, Mary Tudor died in 1558 after a brief reign during which she earned the epithet ‘Bloody Mary’ for her persecution of Protestants. Mary’s Protestant younger sister succeeded her as Queen Elizabeth I. In 1559, during the first year of Elizabeth’s reign, Parliament passed the Act of Uniformity, declaring the state-run Church of England as the only legitimate religious authority, and compulsory for all citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter of Henry Jessey and John Tombes to the Churches of New
    Letters of Henry J essey and John Tombes to the Churches of New England, 1645 1 N 22nd June 1645, seven days before his baptism by Hanserd O Knollys, Henry Jessey wrote to the churches of New England urging the reverend elders to be more tolerant of those persons within their congregations who dissented from the practice of infant baptism, and encouraging the New England divines to keep an open mind to what he believed was the truth of the antipedobaptist position. Toadd weight to 'his argument J essey requested the assistance of John Tombes, who was by the late 1640s, according to Richard Baxter, "reputed the most Learned and able Anabaptist in England". 2 J essey obtained and sent to New England a transcript of Tombes' as then unpublished response to Stephen Marshall's sermon of 1644 defending infant baptism, delivered in Westminster Abbey as the morning lecture to the House of Commons.s Tombes also contributed a prefatory letter, dated 25th May 1645, addressed to John Cotton and Jop.n Wilson of Boston.4 Henry Jessey (1601-1663) became pastor of the Independent Jacob­ Lathrop congregation, meeting in Southwark, London, in 1637,5 Gathered in 1616 by Henry Jacob, the church, over the years, had had some contact with the New World; Jacob had emigrated to Virginia in 1622, and Jessey's other predecessor, John Lathrop, had emigrated with some members of his congregation to Massachusetts Bay in 1634. In November 1624, Jessey became chaplain to Brampton Gurdon at Assington, Suffolk, and there came to know the family of John Win­ cllrop; Winthrop (1588-1649) was elected governor of the new Massa­ chusetts Bay corporation on 20th October 162~, while still in England, and sailed from Southampton on 8th April 1630.
    [Show full text]
  • Ways of Knowing in the Anglican Eucharistic Tradition
    WAYS OF KNOWING IN THE ANGLICAN EUCHARISTIC TRADITION: RAMIFICATIONS FOR THEOLOGICAL EDUCATION BY BRIAN DOUGLAS BA (Hons), BD, MTh (Hons), Dip Teach A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Newcastle, Australia July, 2006 I hereby certify that the work embodied in this thesis is the result of original research and has not been submitted for a higher degree to any other University or Institution (Signed) __________________________________________________ ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The willing and generous assistance of my supervisor, Professor Terence Lovat, Pro-Vice Chancellor (Education and Arts), the University of Newcastle, is gratefully acknowledged. Professor Lovat’s continuing interest, enthusiasm, encouragement, learned comments and suggestions were a great source of direction and purpose for me in the preparation of this thesis. I remain in his debt. My wife Jane and my children James and Alison, through their love, interest, encouragement and patience have supported me in the preparation of this thesis, as they do in every aspect of my life and work. I also acknowledge the contribution to my life of my mate Ron who died at the time I was finalising this thesis. His love and friendship will always sustain me – May he rest in peace and may light perpetual shine upon him. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter 1 Laying the Foundation of Phenomenological Method: The Challenge of a Critical Approach to Theological Education in the Anglican Tradition 1 1.1 The Anglican Communion
    [Show full text]
  • The British Baptists and Politics, 1603-1649
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ The British Baptists and politics, 1603-1649 Wright, Stephen The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 09. Oct. 2021 The British Baptists and Politics, 1603-49 2007_ Stephen John Wright King's College, London - ILC 1L' The British Baptists and Politics, 1603-44 The thesis is concerned to challenge the long-standing orthodoxy in which the Baptists appear as two separate and separately originating denominations called 'Particular' and 'General' defined on the basis of attitude to predestination and the atonement.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Baptists
    History of the Baptists By John T. Christian CHAPTER XVIII A GREAT DEBATE ON BAPTISM THE reign of Charles I, AD 1625-1649, brought almost unlimited disaster upon England. The claim that the king was above law came in with the Stuarts. "He had inherited from his father," says Macaulay, "political theories, and was much disposed to carry them into practice. He was like his father, a zealous Episcopalian. He was, moreover, what his father had never been, a zealous Arminian, and, though no Papist, liked a Papist much better than a Puritan" (Macaulay, History of England, I., 64). Dr. Humphrey Gower, the Vice Chancellor of the University of Cambridge, accurately stated the contention. He says: We still believe and maintain that kings derive not their titles from the people; but from God. That to him only they are accountable. That it belongs not to subjects, either to create or to censure; but to honor and obey their Sovereign; who comes to be so by a fundamental hereditary Right of Succession; which no religion, no law, no fault or forfeiture, can alter or diminish. Account must be taken of another person who was the most intelligent, unscrupulous, and tyrannical enemy that the Baptists of England ever had. Abbot, at the beginning of the reign, was Archbishop of Canterbury; but he was to be succeeded by William Laud the growing Churchman of the times. Macaulay says of him: Of all the prelates of the Anglican Church, Laud had departed farthest from the principles of the Reformation, and drawn nearest to Rome.
    [Show full text]
  • Calvinist, Arminian, and Baptist Perspectives on Soteriology CONTENTS Journal for Baptist Theology and Ministry SPRING 2011 • Vol
    SPRING 2011 • VOLUME 8, NUMBER 1 Calvinist, Arminian, and Baptist Perspectives on Soteriology CONTENTS Journal for Baptist Theology and Ministry SPRING 2011 • Vol. 8, No. 1 © The Baptist Center for Theology and Ministry Editor-in-Chief Associate Editor Assistant Editor Charles S. Kelley, Th.D. Christopher J. Black, Ph.D. Suzanne Davis Executive Editor & Book Review Editors Design and Layout Editors BCTM Director Page Brooks, Ph.D. Frank Michael McCormack Steve W. Lemke, Ph.D. Archie England, Ph.D. Gary D. Myers Dennis Phelps, Ph.D. Calvinist, Arminian, and Baptist Perspectives on Soteriology EDITORIAL INTRODUCTION Calvinist, Arminian, and Baptist Perspectives on Soteriology 1 Steve W. Lemke PART I: THOMAS GRANTHAM’S VIEW OF SALVATION Thomas Grantham’s Theology of the Atonement and Justification 7 J. Matthew Pinson RESPONSE to J. Matthew Pinson’s “Thomas Grantham’s Theology of the Atonement and Justification” 22 Rhyne Putman RESPONSE to J. Matthew Pinson’s “Thomas Grantham’s Theology of the Atonement and Justification” 25 Clint Bass RESPONSE to J. Matthew Pinson’s “Thomas Grantham’s Theology of the Atonement and Justification” 29 James Leonard RESPONSE to Panel 34 Matthew Pinson CONTENTS PART II: CALVINIST AND BAPTIST SOTERIOLOGY The Doctrine of Regeneration in Evangelical Theology: The Reformation to 1800 42 Kenneth Stewart The Bible’s Storyline: How it Affects the Doctrine of Salvation 59 Heather A. Kendall Calvinism and Problematic Readings of New Testament Texts 69 Glen Shellrude Beyond Calvinism and Arminianism: Toward a Baptist Soteriology 87 Eric Hankins Joe McKeever’s Cartoon 101 Book Reviews 102 Reflections 127 Back Issues 128 The Baptist Center for Theology and Ministry is a research institute of New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses Puritans and the human will : voluntarism within mid-seventeenth century puritanism as seen in the works of Richard Baxter and John Owen. McGrath, Gavin John How to cite: McGrath, Gavin John (1989) Puritans and the human will : voluntarism within mid-seventeenth century puritanism as seen in the works of Richard Baxter and John Owen., Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/1418/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 PURITANS AND THE HUMAN WILL: Voluntar ism within mid-seventeenth century English puritanism as seen in the works of Richard Baxter and John Owen Gavin John McGrath A Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Durham Faculty of Arts Theology Department 1989 The copyright of this thesis rests with the author.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life of the Reverend Richard Baxter (1662-1691)
    Life of Baxter v1.qxp:Life of Richard Baxter 8 01 2009 02:05 Page 1 A LIFE OF THE REVEREND RICHARD BAXTER (1662–1691) Life of Baxter v1.qxp:Life of Richard Baxter 8 01 2009 01:58 Page 3 A LIFE OF THE REVEREND RICHARD BAXTER (1662–1691) by FREDERICK J. POWICKE, M.A., Ph.D. Quinta Press Weston Rhyn 2009 Life of Baxter v1.qxp:Life of Richard Baxter 8 01 2009 01:58 Page 4 Quinta Press Meadow View, Weston Rhyn, Oswestry, Shropshire, England, SY10 7RN Visit our web-site: http://www.quintapress.com ISBN 1 897856 xx x First published Layout copyright Quinta Press © 2009 4 Life of Baxter v1.qxp:Life of Richard Baxter 8 01 2009 01:58 Page 5 FIRST PROOF READING DRAFT 5 A LIFE OF THE REVEREND RICHARD BAXTER 1615–1691 Books by the Same Author JOHN NORRIS OF BEMERTON HENRY BARROW, SEPARATIST ROBERT BROWN, PIONEER OF MODERN CONGREGATIONALISM JOHN ROBINSON, ETC. RICHARD BAXTER From a painting by Robert Walker Life of Baxter v1.qxp:Life of Richard Baxter 8 01 2009 01:58 Page 6 6 THE LIFE OF THE REVEREND RICHARD BAXTER (1662–1691) A Life of the Reverend RICHARD BAXTER 1615–1691 by FREDERICK J. POWICKE M.A., Ph.D. Jonathan Cape, Ltd ELEVEN GOWER STREET LONDON FIRST PUBLISHED IN MCMXXIV MADE & PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN BY BUTLER & TANNER LTD LONDON CONTENTS PART ONE PREFACE . 7 NOTE TO THE PORTRAIT . 11 INTRODUCTORY . 15 1 KIDDERMINSTER . 35 2 FIRST PERIOD OF MINISTRY (APRIL 1641–JULY 1642) . 47 3 PERIOD OF SEPARATION (1642–1647) .
    [Show full text]
  • Interpreting the Event: Baptism, Networks and Polemic in Commonwealth England
    This is a repository copy of Interpreting the event: baptism, networks and polemic in Commonwealth England. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/123154/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Searle, A orcid.org/0000-0002-9672-6353 (2018) Interpreting the event: baptism, networks and polemic in Commonwealth England. Seventeenth Century, 33 (5). pp. 513-529. ISSN 0268-117X https://doi.org/10.1080/0268117X.2017.1385515 © 2017, The Seventeenth Century. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Seventeenth Century on 17 Oct 2017, available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/0268117X.2017.1385515. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Alison Searle – Interpreting the Event: Baptism, Networks and Polemic in Commonwealth England This is an author’s copy. For citation please refer to the original: Alison Searle, ‘Interpreting the Event: Baptism, Networks and Polemic in Commonwealth England’, The Seventeenth Century, published online 17 October 2017: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0268117X.2017.1385515 On 1 January 1650 Richard Baxter and John Tombes met at the chapel-of-ease in Bewdley to debate the lawfulness of infant baptism and church membership.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Worship and Practical Theology in the Work of Benjamin Keach (1640-1704)
    PUBLIC WORSHIP AND PRACTICAL THEOLOGY IN THE WORK OF BENJAMIN KEACH (1640-1704) James Barry Vaughn A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St. Andrews 1990 Full metadata for this item is available in Research@StAndrews:FullText at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/2781 This item is protected by original copyright This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License PUBLIC WORSHIP AND PRACTICAL THEOLOGY IN THE WORK OF BENJAMIN KEACH (1640-1704 A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of St. Mary's College University of St. Andrews In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy by James Barry Vaughn May 1989 "Public Worship and Practical Theology in the Work of Benjamin Keach (1640-1704)" Abstract The late seventeenth century was a critical and fruitful period for the Particular Baptists of England. Severely persecuted following the Restoration, toleration in 1689 brought its own perils. Particular Baptists were fortunate in having several strong leaders, especially the London trio of Hanserd Knollys, William Kiffin, and Benjamin Keach. Such a small and severely persecuted group as the Baptists could afford little time for academic pursuits, thus of necessity most of their theology was practical in nature. Benjamin Keach (1640-1704) was the most outstanding practical theologian among the English Particular Baptists of the late seventeenth century. This dissertation is a study of Keach, in particular his writings on public worship and practical theology. Although Keach was a prolific author, he has been almost completely neglected by scholars.
    [Show full text]