DOCSLIB.ORG

Lesson 13: Handout 4, Reading 1 Kristallnacht : the Range of Choices (Part 1)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lesson 13: Handout 4, Reading 1 Kristallnacht : the Range of Choices (Part 1) Lesson 13: Handout 4, Reading 1 Kristallnacht : The range of choices (Part 1) Alfons Heck (From the biography of Alfons Heck, a leader in the Hitler Youth Movement, excerpted from Parallel Journeys by Eleanor Ayer) On the afternoon of November 9, 1938, we were on our way home from school when we ran into small troops of SA and SS men [Nazi police]. We watched open-mouthed as the men . began to smash the windows of every Jewish business in [our town]. Paul Wolff, a local carpenter who belonged to the SS, led the biggest troop, and he pointed out the locations. One of their major targets was Anton Blum’s shoe store next to the city hall. Shouting SA men threw hundreds of pairs of shoes into the street. In minutes they were snatched up and carried home by some of the town’s nicest families—folks you never dreamed would steal anything. 13 It was horribly brutal, but at the same time very exciting to us kids. “Let’s go in and smash some stuff,” urged my buddy Helmut. With shining eyes, he bent down, picked up a rock and fired it toward one of the windows. 14 My grandmother found it hard to understand how the police could disre - gard this massive destruction. [She said,] “There is no excuse for destroying people’s property, no matter who they are. I don’t know why the police didn’t arrest those young Nazi louts.” 15 Purpose: To deepen understanding of how our decisions can perpetuate or prevent injustice and violence by studying Kristallnacht. • 211 Lesson 13: Handout 4, Reading 2 Kristallnacht : The range of choices (Part 1) Andre (Excerpted from “Taking a Stand” pp. 268 –70 in Facing History and Ourselves: Holocaust and Human Behavior ) In November, 1938, twelve-year-old Andre came home from a youth group meeting. He told his father that his youth group leader said that everyone was supposed to meet the next day to throw stones at Jewish stores. Andre said to his father, “I have nothing against the Jews—I hardly know them— but everyone is going to throw stones. So what should I do?” Andre went for a walk to help him figure out what he should do. When he came back, he explained his decision to his parents. “I’ve decided not to throw stones at the Jewish shops. But tomorrow everyone will say, ‘Andre, the son of X, did not take part, he refused to throw stones!’ They will turn against you. What are you going to do?” His father was proud and relieved. He said that the following day, the family would leave Germany. And that is what they did. 16 Purpose: To deepen understanding of how our decisions can perpetuate or prevent injustice and violence by studying Kristallnacht. • 212 Lesson 13: Handout 4, Reading 3 Kristallnacht : The range of choices (Part 1) Melita Maschmann (Excerpted from “Taking a Stand,” pp. 268–70 in Facing History and Ourselves: Holocaust and Human Behavior ) Melita Maschmann lived in a small suburb of Berlin and knew nothing of Kristallnacht until the next morning. As she picked her way through the broken glass on her way to work, she asked a policeman what had hap - pened. After he explained, she recalled: I went on my way shaking my head. For the space of a second I was clearly aware that something terrible had happened there. Something frighteningly brutal. But almost at once I switched over to accepting what had happened as over and done with, and avoiding critical reflec - tion. I said to myself: the Jews are the enemies of the New Germany. Last night they had a taste of what this means. I forced the mem - ory of it out of my consciousness as quickly as possible. As the years went by, I grew better and better at switching off quickly in this man - ner on similar occasions. 17 Purpose: To deepen understanding of how our decisions can perpetuate or prevent injustice and violence by studying Kristallnacht. • 213 Lesson 13: Handout 4, Reading 4 Kristallnacht : The range of choices (Part 1) Frederic Morton (Excerpted from “The Night of the Pogrom,” pp. 263–67 in Facing History and Ourselves: Holocaust and Human Behavior ) The writer Frederic Morton recalls his experience in Vienna, Austria (which had been taken over by Germany) on November 9, 1938: The day began with a thudding through my pillow. Jolts waked me. By that time we’d gone to the window facing the street. At the house entrance two storm troopers lit cigarettes for each other. Their comrades were smashing the synagogue on the floor below us, tossing out a debris of Torahs [holy scripture] and pews. “Oh, my God!” my mother said. The doorbell rang. Ten storm troopers with heavy pickaxes . were young and bright-faced with excitement. “House search,” the leader said. “Don’t move.”. They yanked out every drawer in every one of our chests and cupboards, and tossed each in the air. They let the cutlery jangle across the floor, the clothes scatter, and stepped over the mess to fling the next drawer. Their exuberance was amazing. Amazing, that none of them raised an axe to split our skulls. “We might be back,” the leader said. We did not speak or move or breathe until we heard their boots against the pave - ment. “I am going to the office,” my father said. “Breitel might help.” Breitel, the Reich commissar in my father’s costume-jewelry factory, was a “good” Nazi. Once he’d said we should come to him if there was trouble. My father left. I began to pick up clothes, when the doorbell rang again. It was my father. “I have two min - utes.” “What?” my mother said. But she knew. His eyes had become glass. “There was another crew waiting for me downstairs. They gave me two minutes.” Now I broke down. Four months later he rang our doorbell twice, skull shaven, skeletal, released from Dachau [a prison], somehow alive. 18 Purpose: To deepen understanding of how our decisions can perpetuate or prevent injustice and violence by studying Kristallnacht. • 214 Lesson 13: Handout 4, Reading 5 Kristallnacht : The range of choices (Part 1) The United States (Excerpted from “World Responses” pp. 270–72 in Facing History and Ourselves: Holocaust and Human Behavior ) On November 15, six days after Kristallnacht , President Franklin D. Roosevelt opened a press conference by stating, “The news of the last few days from Germany has deeply shocked public opinion in the United States. I myself could scarcely believe that such things could occur in a twentieth-century civilization.” 19 As punishment to Germany, he announced that the United States was withdrawing its ambassador to Germany. But he did not offer to help the thousands of Jews now trying desperately to leave Germany. Few Americans criticized Roosevelt’s stand. According to a poll taken at the time, 72 percent did not want more Jewish refugees in the United States. In the 1930s Americans were more concerned with unemployment at home than with stateless Jews in Europe. Although many were willing to accept a few famous writers, artists, and scientists who happened to be Jewish, they were less willing to let in thousands of ordinary Jews. Then in February 1939, Senator Robert Wagner of New York and Representative Edith Nourse Rogers of Massachusetts sponsored a bill that would bypass the immigration laws and temporarily admit 20,000 Jewish children who would stay in the country only until it was safe for them to return home. As most were too young to work, they would not take away jobs from Americans. Furthermore, their stay would not cost taxpayers a penny. Various Jewish groups had agreed to assume financial responsibility for the children. Yet the bill encountered strong opposition and was never passed. 20 Purpose: To deepen understanding of how our decisions can perpetuate or prevent injustice and violence by studying Kristallnacht. • 215 Notes 1 Proceedings of the Intergovernmental Committee, Evian, July 6 –15, 1938. Verbatim Record of the Plenary Meetings of the Committee. Resolutions and Reports. London: July 1938, 25. 2 Margot Stern Strom, Facing History and Ourselves: Holocaust and Human Behavior (Brookline: Facing History and Ourselves National Foundation), 264. 3 Anthony Read and David Fisher, Kristallnacht: The Unleashing of the Holocaust (New York: Peter Bedrick Books, 1989), 127. 4 Victoria Barnett, For the Soul of the People: Protestant Protest Against Hitler (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992), 142. 5 Richard Rubenstein, The Cunning of History: Mass Death and the American Future (New York: Harper & Row, 1975), 27. 6 “Extract from the Speech by Hitler,” January 30, 1939, http://www.yadvashem.org/about_holocaust /documents/part1/doc59.html (accessed on January 16, 2009). 7 Rubenstein, The Cunning of History , 33. 8 Helen Fein, Accounting for Genocide (London: The Free Press, 1979), 33. 9 Joe Lobenstein, “ Kristallnacht : Still an Unforgettable Nightmare 70 Years On,” Telegraph , 10 November 2008, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/3416004/Kristallnacht-Still-an -unforgettable-nightmare-70-years-on.html (accessed January 16, 2009). 10 Dan Barry, “A Boy the Bullies Love to Beat Up, Repeatedly,” The New York Times , May 24, 2008, http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/24/us/24land.html?pagewanted=l&_r=l&partner=permalink&exprod =permalink (accessed January 16, 2009). 11 Eleanor Ayer, Parallel Journeys (New York: Aladdin Paperbacks, 1995), 30. 12 Alexandra Zapradur, Salvaged Pages: Young Writers’ Diaries of the Holocaust (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002), 19–23. 13 Ayer, Parallel Journeys , 27. 14 Ibid., 29. 15 Ibid., 30.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1891-1957, Record Group 85 New Orleans, Louisiana Crew Lists of Vessels Arriving at New Orleans, LA, 1910-1945
    Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1891-1957, Record Group 85 New Orleans, Louisiana Crew Lists of Vessels Arriving at New Orleans, LA, 1910-1945. T939. 311 rolls. (~A complete list of rolls has been added.) Roll Volumes Dates 1 1-3 January-June, 1910 2 4-5 July-October, 1910 3 6-7 November, 1910-February, 1911 4 8-9 March-June, 1911 5 10-11 July-October, 1911 6 12-13 November, 1911-February, 1912 7 14-15 March-June, 1912 8 16-17 July-October, 1912 9 18-19 November, 1912-February, 1913 10 20-21 March-June, 1913 11 22-23 July-October, 1913 12 24-25 November, 1913-February, 1914 13 26 March-April, 1914 14 27 May-June, 1914 15 28-29 July-October, 1914 16 30-31 November, 1914-February, 1915 17 32 March-April, 1915 18 33 May-June, 1915 19 34-35 July-October, 1915 20 36-37 November, 1915-February, 1916 21 38-39 March-June, 1916 22 40-41 July-October, 1916 23 42-43 November, 1916-February, 1917 24 44 March-April, 1917 25 45 May-June, 1917 26 46 July-August, 1917 27 47 September-October, 1917 28 48 November-December, 1917 29 49-50 Jan. 1-Mar. 15, 1918 30 51-53 Mar. 16-Apr. 30, 1918 31 56-59 June 1-Aug. 15, 1918 32 60-64 Aug. 16-0ct. 31, 1918 33 65-69 Nov. 1', 1918-Jan. 15, 1919 34 70-73 Jan. 16-Mar. 31, 1919 35 74-77 April-May, 1919 36 78-79 June-July, 1919 37 80-81 August-September, 1919 38 82-83 October-November, 1919 39 84-85 December, 1919-January, 1920 40 86-87 February-March, 1920 41 88-89 April-May, 1920 42 90 June, 1920 43 91 July, 1920 44 92 August, 1920 45 93 September, 1920 46 94 October, 1920 47 95-96 November, 1920 48 97-98 December, 1920 49 99-100 Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Germans: "An Antisemitic People” the Press Campaign After 9 November 1938 Herbert Obenhaus
    The Germans: "An Antisemitic People” The Press Campaign After 9 November 1938 Herbert Obenhaus The pogrom of 9-10 November 1938 gave rise to a variety of tactical and strategic considerations by the German government and National Socialist party offices. The discussions that took place in the Ministry of Propaganda - which in some respects played a pivotal role in the events, due largely to its minister, Josef Goebbels - were of particular significance. On the one hand, the ministry was obliged to document the "wrath of the people" following the assassination of Ernst vom Rath; on the other hand, it was also responsible for manipulating the population by influencing the press and molding opinion. Concerning the events themselves, the main issue was what kind of picture the press was conveying to both a national and an international readership. In the ministry, this prompted several questions: Could it be satisfied with the reactions of the population to vom Rath's murder? What explanation could be given for the people's obvious distance to the events surrounding 9 November? Should the press make greater efforts to influence the opinions prevalent among the population? Should special strategies for the press be developed and pursued after 9 November 1938? Moreover, since the pogrom proved to be a turning point in the regime's policies towards German Jews and marked the beginning of a qualitative change, how should the press react to these changes ? Press activity was also conducted on a second level, that of the NSDAP, which had its own press service, the Nationalsozialistische Partei- Korrespondenz (NSK).1 As was the case with Goebbels' ministry, the 1 It was published in 1938 with the publisher's information, "Commissioned by Wilhelm Weiss responsible for the reports from the Reichspressestelle: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Nazi Germany and Anti-Jewish Policy
    NAZI GERMANY AND ANTI-JEWISH POLICY The Nazi Party rose to power with an antisemitic racial ideology. However, the anti-Jewish campaign was not conducted according to a blueprint, rather it evolved. Before the outbreak of the war, political and economic factors, as well as public opinion both inside and outside Germany influenced the evolution of Nazi anti-Jewish laws and measures. The main purpose of the anti-Jewish policy between 1933 and 1938 according to the racial theory was to isolate German Jewry from German society and ultimately encourage them to leave their homeland. Through 1938 and into 1939, more and more force was used to push Jews out of German territory. In addition to the fact that the laws and decrees were issued chronologically, they should also be understood for how they affected different spheres of life. They affected personal status, the interaction of Jews with general society, and their economic situation. The restrictions affected individuals and the Jewish community as a whole. Jews were not only limited by the SA soldier near a Jewish-owned store on the day of the boycott, Germany. flurry of laws and decrees, they also frequently felt deeply humiliated Yad Vashem Photo Archive (1652/11) by them. BUILD UP OF ANTI-JEWISH POLICY (1933-1938) 1933 1934 marked by boycotts against Jews and the exclusion of Jews from all government - related jobs, including serving as judges and teachers. 1935 marked by the Nuremberg Laws which classified Jews according to racial criteria and deprived them of German citizenship. 1937 1938 marked by increasing anti-Jewish violence, confiscation of Jewish property, - and the forbidding of Jewish ownership of businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • The Perpetrators of the November 1938 Pogrom Through German-Jewish Eyes
    Chapter 4 The Perpetrators of the November 1938 Pogrom through German-Jewish Eyes Alan E. Steinweis The November 1938 pogrom, often referred to as the “Kristallnacht,” was the largest and most significant instance of organized anti-Jewish violence in Nazi Germany before the Second World War.1 In addition to the massive destruc- tion of synagogues and property, the pogrom involved the physical abuse and terrorizing of German Jews on a massive scale. German police reported an official death toll of 91, but the actual number of Jews killed was probably about ten times that many when one includes fatalities among Jews who were treated brutally during their arrest and subsequent imprisonment in Dachau, Buchenwald, and Sachsenhausen.2 Violence had been a normal feature of the Nazi regime’s anti-Jewish measures since 1933,3 but the scale and intensity of the Kristallnacht were unprecedented. The pogrom occurred less than one year before the outbreak of the war and the first atrocities by the Wehrmacht against Polish Jews, and less than three years before the Einsatzgruppen, Order Police, and other units began to undertake the mass murder of Jews in the Soviet Union. Knowledge about the perpetrators of the pogrom, therefore, pro- vides important context for understanding the violence that came later. To be sure, nobody has yet undertaken the extremely ambitious project to identify precisely which perpetrators of the Kristallnacht eventually would participate directly in the “Final Solution.” There certainly were many such cases, however, perhaps the most notable being Odilo Globocnik, who presided over the po- grom violence in Vienna in November 1938 and less than three years later was placed in charge of Operation Reinhardt, the mass murder of the Jews in the General Government.4 1 Many of the observations in this chapter are based on cases described and documented in the author’s book, Kristallnacht 1938 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • An X-Ray of Chilean Right-Wing Attitudes Toward Jews, 1932–1940
    chapter 3 Indifference, Hostility, and Pragmatism: an X-Ray of Chilean Right-Wing Attitudes toward Jews, 1932–1940 Gustavo Guzmán 1 Introduction Convened to discuss the issue of Jewish refugees, the Évian Conference (July 1938) raised two main positions in Chilean politics. While leftists and centrists sympathized with Jews, asking President Alessandri to increase their immigration quotas, rightists remained indifferent to the Jewish plight, reject- ing any attempt to expand their numbers. A leading voice in this regard was Conservative senator Maximiano Errázuriz Valdés, according to whom Chile did not need traders or intermediaries but farmers. “Sadly,” he said, “Jews are not farmers but traders who will come to compete [with our businessmen] and become intermediaries.” Additionally, echoing a discourse that was com- mon at the time in other countries as well, their religion made them “elements difficult to assimilate” and likely “to create a hitherto unknown ethnic prob- lem.” Indeed, the ultimate responsibility for Jew-hatred, he stressed, lay with “the Jews themselves,” as “they create problems where previously they did not exist.” Consequently, Errázuriz Valdés asked the government “to restrict as much as possible the arrival of Jews and not to increase their quotas.”1 Similarly, after Kristallnacht (November 1938), while the leftist and centrist press largely condemned the pogrom, speaking of “barbarism” and “savagery,”2 influential right-wing media such as El Mercurio and El Diario Ilustrado embraced a less sympathetic approach. Although it might be “painful from a human point of view,” El Mercurio stressed, “the reasons that led the German government to expel members of the Jewish race are not for Chileans to dis- cuss because they belong to the right of every nation to govern itself.”3 El Diario 1 Senado de Chile, Boletín de sesiones ordinarias 1938, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronology of Events 1918 – 1938
    Chronology of Events 1918-1938 1918: Czechoslovakia is established after the fall of the Austrian-Hungarian Empire following the First World War. The country is made up of two groups of Slavic peoples, the Czechs and the Slovaks. 1920: The Treaty of Versailles, in which Germany is held responsible for World War I and its consequences, is signed. The treaty deals harshly with a defeated Germany and includes territorial, military, financial and general provisions, including the demilitarization and 15-year occupation of the Rhineland (area between France and Germany), limitations on German armed forces and reparations of 6,600 million pounds. 1921: Adolf Hitler becomes leader of National Socialist German Workers (Nazi) Party. 1923: Beer Hall Putsch (Hitler’s attempt to overthrow regional government in Munich) is unsuccessful and Hitler is jailed. 1925: Mein Kampf (My Struggle), Hitler’s book, is published. 1933: Japan attacks China. The Nazi party gains majority in the German Reichstag and Hitler is named Chancellor. The Reichstag building burns in a “mysterious” fire and all other political parties are abolished. Hitler denounces the Treaty of Versailles. There are public book burnings in Germany. Anti-Jewish laws are passed in Germany: no kosher butchering, no Jewish Civil servants, no Jewish lawyers, quotas for Jews in universities. Any Germans holding non-Nazi political meetings are subject to arrest and imprisonment in concentration camps (the first is Oranienburg, outside of Berlin). Dachau is built as concentration-work camp (specific death camps not yet built, but elderly, those who were very young, disabled or sick have difficulty surviving harsh conditions of camps).
    [Show full text]
  • 235 II.3. the Deepening Crisis: March 1938
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Ghent University Academic Bibliography 235 II.3. The Deepening Crisis: March 1938 – October 1938 1938 is always seen as a watershed in the persecution of the ‘Jews’1 as it was the year when geopolitical changes brought more ‘Jews’ under German rule and when antisemitic policies were substantially radicalized. Yet even before the Anschluss, the Nazis were becoming increasingly worried about the slow pace of Jewish emigration. Their own policies, combined with immigration restrictions elsewhere, had served to limit the numbers able to leave. At the same time, Nazi strategy itself was contradictory, with the ‘Jews’ being pressed to leave while simultaneously being stripped of the assets that would have made them acceptable immigrants in other countries. Nevertheless, individual emigration remained the Nazi strategy for making Germany judenfrei and in general, everything possible was done to hasten the emigration of the – albeit increasingly impoverished – ‘Jews’. A number of official instructions were issued to facilitate this. For example, the police record of Jewish emigrants could be ‘cleansed’ to make them more acceptable to countries of immigration. Professional qualifications that were in demand were also included on passports, and the Handwerkskammern were authorised to issue papers certifying the professional knowledge of Jewish emigrants.2 A partial solution to the fundamental contradictions in Nazi policy was found in more overt state violence and schemes for collective forced emigration that removed individual initiative or choice in destination. The latter element was tried at the beginning of 1938.
    [Show full text]
  • Death Certificate Index - O'brien (July 1919-1921 & 1936-1939) 6/6/2015
    Death Certificate Index - O'Brien (July 1919-1921 & 1936-1939) 6/6/2015 Name Birth Date Birth Place Death Date County Mother's Maiden Name Number Box Abbott, Addie 23 Oct. 1883 Iowa 30 Jan. 1920 O'Brien Philbe 71-01405 D2377 Achotz, John 12 Aug. 1852 Illinois 22 Sept. 1919 O'Brien Fuhrman 71-01216 D2377 Adams, Lincoln 04 July 1865 Illinois 05 Oct. 1939 O'Brien Van Brocklyn 71-0129 D2907 Adams, Morace 20 Nov. 1858 Illinois 12 July 1937 O'Brien VanBrocklin H71-0113 D2840 Addengast, John D. 13 Feb. 1866 Germany 09 Oct. 1939 O'Brien Konstant 71-0127 D2907 Addengast, Mary 27 Dec. 1864 Illinois 15 Feb. 1939 O'Brien Nennenga 71-0027 D2907 Ades, Arastus Marion 01 Oct. 1857 Ohio 10 Mar. 1937 O'Brien Walters H71-0059 D2839 Adkins, Anna 06 Mar. 1891 South Dakota 09 Feb. 1920 O'Brien Ratzleff 71-01273 D2377 Adkins, Rhoda Ann 14 Mar. 1853 Ohio 29 Oct. 1938 O'Brien Unknown J71-0106 D2874 Aldred, Burdell Burnard 19 Sept. 1914 Iowa 04 Sept. 1921 O'Brien Tripplett 71-00018 D2377 Allen, Charles Truesdell 26 Mar. 1877 Iowa 15 July 1939 O'Brien Bentley 71-0109 D2907 Anderson, Carl John 26 Oct. 1872 Sweden 02 Apr. 1937 O'Brien Peterson H71-0065 D2839 Anderson, Chris Sr. 01 Sept. 1844 Denmark 02 Oct. 1939 O'Brien Unknown 71-0136 D2907 Anderson, Grottfrid 14 Nov. 1860 Sweden 20 Sept. 1936 O'Brien Andreas G71-0119 D2804 Anderson, Nels J. 27 Jan. 1850 Denmark 26 Oct. 1938 O'Brien Unknown J71-0112 D2874 Anderson, Ralph 07 July 1865 Scotland 16 June 1939 O'Brien Heath 71-0091 D2907 Anton, Harry Benigamine 06 May 1889 Minnesota 14 Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Escape to Shanghai: 1938-1940
    Flight to Shanghai, 1938-1940: The Larger Setting Avraham Altman and Irene Eber Between November 1938 and August 1939, approximately 20,000 Central European refugees, most of them Jews, landed in Shanghai. They had sailed on German, Italian, and Japanese ships and, in the short span of eight months, constituted a massive exodus. What, however, is the background to this phenomenon, and, moreover, why did it rapidly diminish after August 1939?1 In order to answer these questions, we must look at the larger setting within which this process took place—something that, until now, has not been investigated. The Background In 1933, when Hitler came to power, there were around 500,000 Jews in Germany and 185,000 in Austria.2 In contrast to the gradual pressure over several years that had been exerted on the Jews in Germany to leave the country, when Austria came under German rule in March 1938, the Jews were immediately and ruthlessly persecuted. By launching an organized terror campaign against them—confiscating their property, depriving them of all means of livelihood, and incarcerating Jewish men in concentration camps—the Nazis forced the Austrian Jews to 1This paper is part of a larger project on the Jewish communities in modern China under Japanese occupation. The authors wish to thank the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and its Truman Research Institute for their partial support of this research. Irene Eber thanks the J.K. Fairbank Research Center, Harvard University, where additional research was carried out in 1996-1997, and the Andover Newton Theological School where she was Visiting Judson Professor.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution Patterns in Old-Age Assistance Payments Approved in 1938–39
    Distribution Patterns in Old-Age Assistance Payments Approved in 1938-39* THE DEGREE OF SECURITY provided by old-age need of the individuals who receive them. Various assistance and its availability to individuals in legislative and administrative standards and pro• need of it are matters of major concern both to cedures for defining eligibility, establishing need, recipients and to administrators of old-age assist• and determining payments, however, influence the ance. Neither the degree of security nor the amounts of payments as do also the financial equity with which it is provided can be appraised resources available to the agencies. Distribution except in relation to the varying requirements and patterns for the various States permit examina• resources of individual recipients. Comprehen• tion of the effects of such legislative, administra• sive data on the circumstances of recipients are not tive, and financial factors upon amounts of assist• ance payments. Analysis of these patterns sug• Chart 1.—Distribution of monthly payments initially gests further stops which will be required if the approved for recipients accepted for old-age assistance programs of old-age assistance in the States are in the United States, fiscal year 1938-39 1 to achieve more fully their objective of supplying adequate aid on an equitable basis to needy aged persons. Information on the distribution of payments to all recipients is not available, but the distribution of the amounts initially approved for new recip• ients accepted for old-age assistance during 3 complete fiscal years has been reported to the Social Security Board by State agencies.1 This article presents information on the distribution of initial monthly payments in the various States for the fiscal year July 1938 through June 1939.
    [Show full text]
  • British Appeasement 1936-1939: the Debate Between Parliament and the Public
    University Libraries Lance and Elena Calvert Calvert Undergraduate Research Awards Award for Undergraduate Research 2017 British Appeasement 1936-1939: The Debate between Parliament and the Public Kylie D. Johnson College of Liberal Arts- History and Political Science, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/award Part of the Diplomatic History Commons, European History Commons, Military History Commons, Political History Commons, and the Public History Commons Repository Citation Johnson, K. D. (2017). British Appeasement 1936-1939: The Debate between Parliament and the Public. Available at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/award/31 This Research Paper is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Research Paper in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Research Paper has been accepted for inclusion in Calvert Undergraduate Research Awards by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. British Appeasement 1936-1939: The Debate between Parliament and the Public Kylie Johnson Dr. Michelle Tusan Johnson 2 Following the Great War, the countries in Europe were wary of another devastating war plaguing the world. The years of fighting and the immense loss of life permeated the minds of the people of the world for decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Station 1: Polling Data / Roosevelt's Response
    Handout Station 1: Polling Data / Roosevelt’s Response Polling Data, Part 1 Directions: Read this November 1938 polling result of the American people following the events of Kristallnacht. Then respond to question 1 independently. Discuss your response to question 1 as a group before moving on to Part 2 of this handout. Poll: Do you approve or disapprove of the Nazi treatment of Jews in Germany? American Institute of Public Opinion, November 1938 American Institute of Public Opinion, 94% Disapprove 6% Approve 1. In 1938 poll, respondents were asked a follow-up to the question above: Should we allow a larger number of Jewish exiles from Germany to come to the United States to live? What percentage of Americans do you predict answered yes? Write your prediction and an explanation in the space below. Then examine the results on Part 2 of this handout to see if you were correct. facinghistory.org ushmm.org 1 Station 1: Polling Data / Roosevelt’s Response (continued) Polling Data, Part 2 Directions: Compare your prediction from Part 1 to the actual poll results below. Then answer question 2. Poll: Should we allow a larger number of Jewish exiles from Germany to come to the United States to live? American Institute of Public Opinion, November 1938 American Institute of Public Opinion, 71% No 21% Yes 8% No Opinion 2. Was your initial prediction accurate? Explain the thinking behind your initial prediction. What conclusions can you draw by comparing the poll above with the poll from Part 1? facinghistory.org ushmm.org 2 Station 1: Polling Data / Roosevelt’s Response (continued) Roosevelt’s Response Directions: Read and annotate the following document, and then answer the question that appears below the reading.
    [Show full text]