Tradition Adrift

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tradition Adrift TRADITION ADRIFT: THE HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE BLESSING OF THE FLEET IN STONINGTON, CONNECTICUT, 1950-2007 Thesis Submitted to The College of Arts and Sciences of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Master of Arts in Theological Studies By Justin James Menno Dayton, Ohio August, 2011 TRADITION ADRIFT: THE HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE BLESSING OF THE FLEET IN STONINGTON, CONNECTICUT, 1950-2007 Name: Menno, Justin James APPROVED BY: ___________________________________________ Anthony B. Smith, Ph.D Faculty Advisor ___________________________________________ William L. Portier, Ph.D Faculty Reader ___________________________________________ Sandra Yocum, Ph.D Faculty Reader ii ABSTRACT TRADITION ADRIFT: THE HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE BLESSING OF THE FLEET IN STONINGTON, CONNECTICUT, 1950-2007 Name: Menno, Justin J. University of Dayton Advisor: Anthony B. Smith, Ph.D The following study is a narrative account of the history and development of the annual Blessing of the Fleet held in Stonington, Connecticut from its earliest celebrations in the 1950s to its most recent in 2007. Particular attention is devoted to the ethnic Portuguese community of Stonington, their historical organization and shaping of the local fishing fleet, and their creative development of the annual Blessing. By attending to the history and development of the annual Blessing, this account primarily seeks to describe the event in terms of the people who simply and affectionately referred to it as the “Blessing.” As a historical-theological account, this study proceeds according to a lex orandi, lex credendi approach. As a consequence, special attention is given to the content and mode of prayers that have been offered over the course of the annual Blessing‟s history and celebration. These prayers are not only primary sites for reflection on the origin and destiny of this community‟s historical and anticipated life in Christ, but are departure points for iii analysis concerning how various dimensions of the local fleet‟s life have been formally shaped through the celebration of the annual Blessing. In short, this study is a particular reflection on the integration of labor in liturgy in the U.S. An important focus of this study centers on how the history and development of the annual Blessing has been informed by other popular liturgies in the ethnic Portuguese community of Stonington, American Protestant piety in the mid-twentieth century, economic and regulatory issues concerning the local fishing fleet, and the pressures fishing exerted on local family life. And no figure at the annual Blessing drew together these various influences more than St. Peter. Because the life this community celebrated and anticipated was publically displayed at the annual Blessing in terms of the life of the communion of saints, this study describes in detail how the community addressed St. Peter, where they variously placed and processed him over the course of the event, how devotion to him was integrally related to the vocation of fishing in the local fleet. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………….iii CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………….1 CHAPTER TWO: DAYS AND NIGHTS OF THE ANNUAL BLESSING…………....14 CHAPTER THREE: THE HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE ANNUAL BLESSING……………………………………………………………………………….29 CHAPTER FOUR: THE INNER MEANINGS OF THE ANNUAL BLESSING…….175 BIBLIOGRAPHY……………………………………………………………………….206 v Chapter 1: Introduction This is a story about the “Blessing.” Specifically, it is a narrative account of the history and development of the annual Blessing of the Fleet held in Stonington, Connecticut from its earliest celebrations in the 1950s to its most recent in 2007. While this is primarily the story of an event, it is also a story about the Portuguese immigrants and their children who resided in and fished out of Stonington. These otherwise ordinary people who raised nets, families and prayers together cooperated to create a remarkably exceptional event uniting their shared way of life in a novel celebration of their present and anticipated life. The renewal of this life was a thematic concern of the Blessing‟s annual celebration, and took shape in the community‟s activities of praying and parading, revelry and remembrance, and feasting and fellowship. By attending to these activities and their development, the following account attempts to describe this event in terms of the people who simply and affectionately referred to it as the “Blessing.” In short, this is a narrative about a people who prayed and worked, and who distinctively prayed about their work. While distinctive is an appropriate word to describe both the history and development of the annual Blessing, complexity is another. The written records of this event and the oral testimony of its participants and chroniclers provide at least four different dates for the “first” celebration of the “Blessing of the Fleet”—1950, 1954, 1955 and 1956 to be exact. The written sources, in particular, indicate that the event‟s 1 established origin was variously dated from 1954, 1955 and 1956. The transition among the three dates was largely fluid and unremarked in these different sources. 2 Oral sources, however, are even more complex and contentious. Disagreements about the Blessing‟s “first” celebration continue even today to animate disputes among older members of the Portuguese community in Stonington. However, amidst these competing claims, the annual Blessing held in 1955 has eventually emerged in most of the source material over the past three decades as the popularly recognized “original” Blessing of the Fleet. This development inevitably raises a number of important questions about interpretive privilege and criteria. The annual Blessing held in 1955 did not come to be privileged as the “first” because it was the earliest. Nor was it privileged because it fixed the earliest system for dating subsequent annual celebrations—the 1956 Blessing was, in fact, originally used to do this. And as far as the historical record indicates, the Blessing held in 1955 did not achieve its privileged status as the result of some debate that ultimately adjudicated competing claims to the title of “first.” Searching for criteria external to the Blessing held in 1955 to help determine the reasons for its privilege may indeed be the wrong interpretive approach. This is not to diminish the importance of critical analysis and research. Rather, it is to note that close attention to the history of the Blessing and its development indicates that these approaches did not principally guide decisions about privileging one celebration as the unambiguous “original” over another. These decisions, if the term can be permitted, were more subtle, more affective, and more related to the total involvement of the gathered community in the annual Blessing. In short, they were not fundamentally logical or individual. The Blessing held in 1955 creatively introduced many of the aspects that constitute the contemporary practices of the annual Blessing, including the celebration of the “Fishermen‟s Mass,” the procession of St. Peter, the street parade in Stonington Borough, the boat parade at the 3 Stonington Town Dock, and the offering of prayers for each Stonington fisherman who has died at sea. If the privilege of this particular Blessing was not immediately recognized at first, it was not due to the absence of its form and content in subsequent celebrations. The following account of the multiple popular “histories” of the annual Blessing, and their relative resolution into a single coherent narrative claims that the formal development of this resolution cannot be understood apart from the local celebration of the Eucharist in Stonington. As a creative and formal prompt, the living recollection of the paschal mystery in sacrament has been integral to the annual Blessing and its development. Over the course of this celebration, the activities of blessing and commemoration drew together the anticipation of abundant life and the inheritance of a tradition of sacrifice and commitment to work in and through the performance of the annual Blessing. Long before the earliest celebration of the annual Blessing, the Eucharist had served to organize the history of St. Mary‟s Parish in Stonington. Even though the parish had been formally organized in 1850, the standard history of the parish has instead used the date of the parish‟s dedication and first public mass in October of 1851 as the founding date of the parish. Like the history of this parish, the account of the history of annual Blessing gestures toward a similar founding in and through the celebration of Eucharist. Establishing the founding of the annual Blessing‟s history apparently was not simply a matter of comparing competing accounts, judging their merits, and selecting the most “authentic” narrative. These accounts were never put on trial, and arbitrated once and for all outside of the celebration of the annual Blessing. Instead, the tradition of the Blessing and the history which unfolded from its celebration were more related to fleet members who, over the course of the Blessing‟s annual celebration, cast about for this history in and with the Eucharist they annually shared, the blessing they annually received, and commemoration 4 they annually performed. Their settled sense of this history was not only drawn from, but inseparably related to, these activities. The ordinary work of fleet members was linked to and integrated within the work of their organization and transmission of the annual Blessing‟s history. Like the ordinary grounds of their work, the liturgical ground of the annual Blessing implicated them in a labor that interwove excitement, hope, surprise, vulnerability, suffering, and commitment to preserve the integrity of creation and the dignity others. At this annual celebration, labor was integrated and given meaning within liturgy. For fleet members, the ordinary experience of the life-giving waters at sea was not only informed, but, in a way, reformed through the formal blessing‟s life-giving waters and the Eucharist‟s life-giving bread.
Recommended publications
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Paul H
    CURRICULUM VITAE Paul H. Fry William Lampson Professor of English, Emeritus Yale University Office: Henry Koerner Center, Rm. 118 Yale University New Haven, CT 06520 203-824-3761 [email protected] EDUCATION AND DEGREES Harvard University. May 1974 Ph. D. Dissertation: “Byron’s Myth of the Self” University of California, Berkeley. 1966 B. A. GRANTS AND AWARDS 2018. Juror, Brock International Teaching Prize 2011. Winner, Stephen Sondheim Inspirational Teaching Award, Kennedy Center for the Arts 2008- Appointed Associate Member, Department of Comparative Literature, Yale 2008- Awarded Provostial Research Fund. Fall 2008-Spring 2009. Residency, Yale Center for British Art, to develop an interdisciplinary course syllabus. Fall 2002-Spring 2003. Full-year Leave of Absence 1999. Reappointed: Master, Ezra Stiles College, Yale 1995. Named: Master, Ezra Stiles College, Yale 1993. Named: The William Lampson Professor of English 1989. A. Whitney Griswold Research Grant 1988. Named Instructor, NEH Faculty Seminar, Summer 1989 1987. Honorable Mention, the John H. McGinnis Award, Southwest Review 1986. Promoted to Full Professor, Yale University. 1985. Appointed Fellow, Whitney Humanities Center (1985-88) 1982. Granted Tenure, Yale University 1981. The Melville Cane Award (Poetry Society of America) for The Poet’s Calling in the English Ode 1979. Frederick W. Hilles Publication Fund 1978. A. Whitney Griswold Research Grant 1976-77. Morse Fellowship 1971. Charles William Eliot Medal, Eliot House, Harvard University 1971. Assistant Senior Tutor, Eliot House, Harvard University 1970. Dexter Summer Grant, Harvard University 1966-67. Woodrow Wilson Fellowship 1966. Outstanding Undergraduate English Major, University of California, Berkeley 1965. Phi Beta Kappa TEACHING EXPERIENCE Spring 2020, emeritus graduate seminar, “Byron, Shelley and Keats” Spring 2019, emeritus seminar, “Romantic Literature and Painting” Phased Retirement 2016-18.
    [Show full text]
  • Barnum Institute NHL Final 508.Docx
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NPS Form 10-934 (Rev. 12-2015) OMB Control No. 1024-0276 (Exp. 01/31/2019) BARNUM INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Historic Landmarks Nomination Form 1. NAME AND LOCATION OF PROPERTY Historic Name: Barnum Institute of Science and History Other Name/Site Number: Barnum Museum Street and Number (if applicable): 820 Main Street City/Town: Bridgeport County: Fairfield State: CT 2. SIGNIFICANCE DATA NHL Criteria: 2 NHL Criteria Exceptions: N/A NHL Theme(s): III. Expressing Cultural Values 1. educational and intellectual currents 6. popular and traditional culture Period(s) of Significance: 1893–1934 Significant Person(s) (only Criterion 2): Barnum, Phineas Taylor (P. T.) Cultural Affiliation (only Criterion 6): N/A Designer/Creator/Architect/Builder: Longstaff, George W.; Hurd, Frank W. Historic Contexts: XXVII. Education G. Adjunct Educational Institutions 1. Museums, Archives, and Botanical Gardens XXXIV. Recreation B. Spectator Pastimes 4. Circuses 5. Zoos, Aquariums, and Planetariums Paperwork Reduction Act Statement. We are collecting this information under the authority of the Historic Sites Act of 1935 (16 U.S.C. 461-467) and 36 CFR part 65. Your response is required to obtain or retain a benefit. We will use the information you provide to evaluate properties nominated as National Historic Landmarks. We may not conduct or sponsor and you are not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. We estimate the time to prepare an initial inquiry letter is 2 hours, including time to maintain records, gather information, and review and submit the letter.
    [Show full text]
  • What's Inside
    13 VOLUME 16 PUBLISHED by J. RUSSELL JINISHIAN TH COMPLIMENTARY ANNIVERSARY ISSUE ™ An Insider’s Guide to Marine Art for Collectors and Historians What’s Inside: • Latest News from Today’s Premier Marine Artists • Latest Marine Art Sales and Prices • Insights into the Art Market at Large • Marine Art Exhibitions Across the Country • Upcoming Auctions • Book Reviews Two Distinguished Artists Paint Historic Nantucket… Being sold to benefit the Egan Maritime Institute in Nantucket, Massachusetts John Stobart (b. 1929) Nantucket Whalers, Nantucket Harbor, 1835 Oil on Canvas 12”x 20” $125,000 Roy Cross (b.1924) Old Nantucket in the early 1840’s Whaleship Alpha Oil on Canvas 24”x 36” $55,000 Information on purchasing the artwork pictured in the MARINE ART NEWS may be obtained by contacting the Publisher, J. Russell Jinishian at (203) 259-8753 or [email protected] News From the Artists s always there are a great many exhi- Coast. In 2013 John Stobart helped kick off Across the Pond the Royal Society of Marine bitions, artistic projects and marine the exhibition with a presentation on his career. Artists, founded just after the Second World goings-on across the country and 2015’s featured artist will be Washington state War, operates its own campaign to identify and Aaround the world to report—so let’s get right resident Frank Gaffney. (www.coosart.org) reward young artists in the field. Their annual to the news. Every year the “Fellows” of the Society get get together is held in conjunction each year The American Society of Marine Artists together and review portfolio submissions with their Annual Exhibition during the month Mall Galleries (ASMA), following its mission “to recognize of artists for new members in the Society.
    [Show full text]
  • East Village/Lower East Side Historic District Designation Report
    Cover Photographs: 38 to 34 East 3rd Street (c. 1835-36); 122 to 116 East 7th Street (c. 1862-63); New York Turn Verein, 66 East 4th Street (1871, Kinkel & Klemt); 25 to 29 East 7th Street (1880, Jobst Hoffmann); 95 to 99 East 7th Street (c. 1891, Kurtzer & Rohl; c. 1891, Schneider & Herter); 69 to 75 East 4th Street (c. 1899, Michael Bernstein; c. 1901, Horenburger & Straub; c. 1897, George F. Pelham); 111 East 7th Street (c. 1901, Michael Bernstein). Christopher D. Brazee, 2010 and 2012 East Village/Lower East Side Historic District Designation Report Essay prepared by Christopher D. Brazee Architects’ Appendix prepared by Virginia Kurshan Building Profiles prepared by Christopher D. Brazee, Jennifer L. Most, Donald G. Presa, and Virginia Kurshan Edited by Mary Beth Betts, Director of Research Photographs by Christopher D. Brazee Map by Jennifer L. Most Commissioners Robert B. Tierney, Chair Pablo E. Vengoechea, Vice-Chair Frederick Bland Christopher Moore Diana Chapin Margery Perlmutter Michael Devonshire Elizabeth Ryan Joan Gerner Roberta Washington Michael Goldblum Kate Daly, Executive Director Mark Silberman, Counsel Sarah Carroll, Director of Preservation TABLE OF CONTENTS EAST VILLAGE/LOWER EAST SIDE HISTORIC DISTRICT MAP ........................... FACING PAGE 1 TESTIMONY AT THE PUBLIC HEARING .............................................................................................. 3 EAST VILLAGE/LOWER EAST SIDE HISTORIC DISTRICT BOUNDARIES ....................................... 3 SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Our Future by Design Centenary University’S New Strategic Design Process Is Shaping the Future of Our Students and Our University
    The Magazine of Centenary University Fall/Winter 2017 CENTENARIAN Our future by Innovate • Restructure • Partner • Invest • Recruit & Retain • Enhance INSIDE WHAT’S BEHIND CENTENARY’S 95% SUCCESS RATE? WELCOME uch of this issue of The Centenarian focuses probably reveal some more fundamental needs, such as good on the Strategic Design Process that is setting faculty mentorship, real-world experience, just-in-time and the course for Centenary’s future. Those individually paced learning, and a supportive community. words were chosen deliberately. For us, As we investigate how to meet our students’ real needs, “strategy” has a very specific meaning: an the design process teaches us how to be creative within Minitiative is strategic if it requires a change in behavior in order the constraints of our “design space,” such as the limited to achieve a result that cannot be attained by business as usual. financial capacity of both the institution and our students, the As private, tuition-driven colleges and universities face ever demographics of northwest New Jersey and the geography and steeper challenges, Centenary will remain vibrant only if we are culture of our location. How can we work with those constraints willing to be strategic in exactly that results-oriented, behavior- to create programs that are feasible, viable and desirable for changing sense. This doesn’t mean that we simply change from Centenary? For example, as the population of traditional-aged a set of old behaviors to a set of new behaviors. Rather, it means college students declines, how can we reach out to new learners that we must constantly be looking at how the results we want in corporations, the working world and retirement villages? to achieve will require different ways of doing things: different How can we seek funding from donors who are excited about pedagogies, different uses of technology, different business Centenary’s approach to education? How can we combine practices and appeals to different audiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Ghetto Storm Page 2
    EVERY 28 HOURS Issued by Malcolm X Grassroots Movement April 2013 | www.mxgm.org Produced by the Every 36 Hours Campaign Contents Preface by Kali Akuno: Context for Operation Ghetto Storm page 2 Memorial: We will never forget. May they rest in power. page 7 Frequently Asked Questions page 10 Why do you call this Report “Operation Ghetto Storm”? How does this Report relate to the one released in July 2012? Does a Black person really get killed every 28 hours by the state? How reliable are your numbers? What about intra-communal violence of “Black-on-Black killing? How do these numbers compare with the killing of white people? How do extrajudicial killings relate to Black women? What about resources for stopping these modern-day lynchings? Highlights, include: summaries of patterns of 313 killings page 19 Report on 313 Extrajudicial Killings. Name, by name, tables include page 30 Photos. Dates and ages at death Places and details of encounters What happened after each killing? Progress towards justice? Gratitude: A note from the author, Arlene Eisen page 130 Preface by Kali Akuno The Context for Operation Ghetto Storm The facts presented in Operation Ghetto Storm: 2012 Annual Report on the Extrajudicial Killing of Black People present us with a deeper understanding of the utter disregard held for Black life within the United States. Operation Ghetto Storm is a window offering a cold, hard, and fact‐based view into the thinking and practice of a government and a society that will spare no cost to control the lives of Black people.
    [Show full text]