Aflps Congruent with Morphological Differentiation of Asian Common
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Monroe County Soil & Water Conservation District Fish Program
Monroe County Soil & Water Conservation District Fish Program Catalog Inside Triploid Grass Carp………………….2 Fathead Minnows…....3 Channel Catfish……...4 Koi (no longer offered).…..5 Yellow Perch………...6 Largemouth Bass..…...7 Fish Stocking Program The Monroe County Soil and Water Conservation District’s fish program is a Rainbow Trout……….8 biannual event, offered in spring and summer each year. Harsh winters cause many fish kills in ponds throughout Monroe County, and the Soil and Water Conservation District offers this program to help restock ponds. The species Black Crappie………..9 typically available for stocking include, but are not limited to: Pumpkinseed……….10 Triploid grass carp (10-12”), Catfish (6”), Fathead minnows (1-1.5”), Yellow Perch (2-3" or 4-6”) and Largemouth Bass (2-3” or 4-6”) Barley Straw……......11 You will need to bring 20 gallons of pond water for every 6 Grass Carp, 30 Fish Habitat Spheres..12 Catfish, 30 Goldfish, 500 minnows, 100 Bass, or 150 Perch for a travel time of 30-45 minutes. Please Do NOT use tap water! Use pond water and be sure to bring a cover for the container(s) you’ll be using, so the water doesn’t splash and your fish can’t escape. Five gallon pails, old coolers, trash cans or other similar containers will work. Monroe County Soil and Water Conservation District 145 Paul Road, Building #5 Rochester, NY 14624 (585) 753-7380 Monroe County Soil & Water http://www.monroecountyswcd.org/ Conservation District Providing Today, Protecting Tomorrow This document has been produced to provide a summary of all the species that MCSWCD offers Fish Catalog Page 2 Triploid Grass Carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) Photo courtesy of New York State Department of Conservation. -
Nansei Islands Biological Diversity Evaluation Project Report 1 Chapter 1
Introduction WWF Japan’s involvement with the Nansei Islands can be traced back to a request in 1982 by Prince Phillip, Duke of Edinburgh. The “World Conservation Strategy”, which was drafted at the time through a collaborative effort by the WWF’s network, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), posed the notion that the problems affecting environments were problems that had global implications. Furthermore, the findings presented offered information on precious environments extant throughout the globe and where they were distributed, thereby providing an impetus for people to think about issues relevant to humankind’s harmonious existence with the rest of nature. One of the precious natural environments for Japan given in the “World Conservation Strategy” was the Nansei Islands. The Duke of Edinburgh, who was the President of the WWF at the time (now President Emeritus), naturally sought to promote acts of conservation by those who could see them through most effectively, i.e. pertinent conservation parties in the area, a mandate which naturally fell on the shoulders of WWF Japan with regard to nature conservation activities concerning the Nansei Islands. This marked the beginning of the Nansei Islands initiative of WWF Japan, and ever since, WWF Japan has not only consistently performed globally-relevant environmental studies of particular areas within the Nansei Islands during the 1980’s and 1990’s, but has put pressure on the national and local governments to use the findings of those studies in public policy. Unfortunately, like many other places throughout the world, the deterioration of the natural environments in the Nansei Islands has yet to stop. -
Beta Diversity Patterns of Fish and Conservation Implications in The
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 817: 73–93 (2019)Beta diversity patterns of fish and conservation implications in... 73 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.817.29337 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Beta diversity patterns of fish and conservation implications in the Luoxiao Mountains, China Jiajun Qin1,*, Xiongjun Liu2,3,*, Yang Xu1, Xiaoping Wu1,2,3, Shan Ouyang1 1 School of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China 2 Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Environment and Resource Utilization, Ministry of Education, School of Environmental and Chemical Engi- neering, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China 3 School of Resource, Environment and Chemical Engineering, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China Corresponding author: Shan Ouyang ([email protected]); Xiaoping Wu ([email protected]) Academic editor: M.E. Bichuette | Received 27 August 2018 | Accepted 20 December 2018 | Published 15 January 2019 http://zoobank.org/9691CDA3-F24B-4CE6-BBE9-88195385A2E3 Citation: Qin J, Liu X, Xu Y, Wu X, Ouyang S (2019) Beta diversity patterns of fish and conservation implications in the Luoxiao Mountains, China. ZooKeys 817: 73–93. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.817.29337 Abstract The Luoxiao Mountains play an important role in maintaining and supplementing the fish diversity of the Yangtze River Basin, which is also a biodiversity hotspot in China. However, fish biodiversity has declined rapidly in this area as the result of human activities and the consequent environmental changes. Beta diversity was a key concept for understanding the ecosystem function and biodiversity conservation. Beta diversity patterns are evaluated and important information provided for protection and management of fish biodiversity in the Luoxiao Mountains. -
屏東縣萬安溪台灣石魚賓(Acrossocheilus Paradoxus )之棲
生物學報(2006)41(2): 103-112 屏東縣萬安溪台灣石魚賓(Acrossocheilus paradoxus)之棲地利用 1 2* 孔麒源 戴永禔 1 國立屏東科技大學野生動物保育研究所 2 中原大學景觀學系 (收稿日期:2006.5.3,接受日期:2006.12.19) 摘 要 自 2005 年 7 月至 12 月以浮潛觀察法於屏東縣萬安溪調查台灣石魚賓 之棲地利用。依體長區分小 魚(1-4cm)、中魚(5-9cm)、大魚(>10cm)三種體型。棲地利用測量變數包括上層遮蔽度、水深、底層 水溫、溶氧與底質。小魚選擇各項棲地變數之平均值分別為:上層遮蔽度 16%、水深 85.2cm、底 層水溫 23.5℃、溶氧 9.2mg/L;中魚則為上層遮蔽度 17%、水深 105.8cm、底層水溫 23.6℃、溶氧 9.5 mg/L;大魚選擇上層遮蔽度、水深、底層水溫、溶氧則分別為 18%、106.9cm、23.9℃、8.9 mg/L。 三種體型台灣石魚賓 皆選擇岩壁(Bedrock)及大巨石(Boulder)為底質需求。小魚在雨、旱季間選擇水 深顯著不同;中、大魚則無差異。本研究結果顯示,台灣石魚賓 對棲地選擇依據二階段生活史而異; 對岩壁及大巨石之偏好與覓食無關,而與躲藏及障蔽功能有關。 關鍵詞:台灣石魚賓 、棲地利用、生態工法、水深、生活史、淡水魚、溪流、底質 緒 言 Day, 1996; 1997)。台 灣 石 魚賓 於不同溪流之族群之 間已有分化之現象,遺傳變異性以後龍溪為分界 台灣石魚賓 (Acrossocheilus paradoxus)屬鯉科 可分為南北二群集 (Tseng et al., 2000),然而依粒 (Cyprinidae) ,魚賓 亞科(Barbinae) ,光唇魚屬 腺體 DNA 則可分為北中南三大群類;濁水溪為 (Acrossocheilus),俗稱石斑、石賓或秋斑(Günther, 台灣石魚賓 親緣關係的輻射中心 (Hsu et al., 1868; Oshima, 1919; Sung, 1992; Sung et al., 1993; 2000)。 Tzeng, 1986b; Chen and Fang, 1999)。本種魚體延 台灣石魚賓 依賴視覺覓食,其主要覓食對象為 長且略為側扁,口下位,具 2 對鬚。體色黃綠, 水生節肢動物(Ciu and Wang, 1996)。台灣石魚賓 對 腹部略白,體側有 7 條黑色橫帶,幼魚期特別明 於環境因子之耐受限度,最高致死水溫在 35.5 至 顯,成魚時因體色變深而較不明顯。性成熟之 36.5℃之間,與魚體大小無關;最低致死水溫則 雌、雄個體吻部均有追星,尤以雄魚特別明顯且 在 5.5 至 7.0℃之間,並與魚體大小呈反比。台灣 尖刺(Tzeng, 1986b; Chen and Fang, 1999)。成 熟 雄 石魚賓 對於水中溶氧的消耗與水溫成正比;其致死 魚臀鰭基部與鰭條間薄膜上亦有角質化瘤狀凸 溶氧量亦與水溫高低有關。其養殖適溫約在 25 起(Ciu and Wang, 1996)。胸腰部脊椎骨間有成對 至 30℃之間(Peng, 1992)。台灣石魚賓 對 於 銅、鎘、 轉移關節突、腹鰭最外側鰭條並有韌帶與肋骨相 鋅等重金屬離子的急性毒性反應可作為水質檢 連接,此些構造皆有助於台灣石魚賓 適存在急流亂 測時的一項指標(Chen and Yuan, 1994)。 瀨之溪流環境中(Ciu and Wang, 1996)。 台灣北部南勢溪支流桶后溪台灣石魚賓 之生殖 台灣石魚賓 為台灣特有種之初級淡水魚。本種 季自 3 月至 10 月、生殖高峰在 4 至 6 月之時, 分布甚廣,台灣島西半部主要河川如淡水河、頭 -
Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 1 1 8(2): 143—1 86
2009. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 1 1 8(2): 143—1 86 THE "LOST" JORDAN AND HAY FISH COLLECTION AT BUTLER UNIVERSITY Carter R. Gilbert: Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611 USA ABSTRACT. A large fish collection, preserved in ethanol and assembled by Drs. David S. Jordan and Oliver P. Hay between 1875 and 1892, had been stored for over a century in the biology building at Butler University. The collection was of historical importance since it contained some of the earliest fish material ever recorded from the states of South Carolina, Georgia, Mississippi and Kansas, and also included types of many new species collected during the course of this work. In addition to material collected by Jordan and Hay, the collection also included specimens received by Butler University during the early 1880s from the Smithsonian Institution, in exchange for material (including many types) sent to that institution. Many ichthyologists had assumed that Jordan, upon his departure from Butler in 1879. had taken the collection. essentially intact, to Indiana University, where soon thereafter (in July 1883) it was destroyed by fire. The present study confirms that most of the collection was probably transferred to Indiana, but that significant parts of it remained at Butler. The most important results of this study are: a) analysis of the size and content of the existing Butler fish collection; b) discovery of four specimens of Micropterus coosae in the Saluda River collection, since the species had long been thought to have been introduced into that river; and c) the conclusion that none of Jordan's 1878 southeastern collections apparently remain and were probably taken intact to Indiana University, where they were lost in the 1883 fire. -
Population Genetic Structure of Indigenous Ornamental Teleosts, Puntius Denisonii and Puntius Chalakkudiensis from the Western Ghats, India
POPULATION GENETIC STRUCTURE OF INDIGENOUS ORNAMENTAL TELEOSTS, PUNTIUS DENISONII AND PUNTIUS CHALAKKUDIENSIS FROM THE WESTERN GHATS, INDIA Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Marine Sciences of the Cochin University of Science and Technology Cochin – 682 022, Kerala, India by LIJO JOHN (Reg. No. 3100) National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources Cochin Unit CENTRAL MARINE FISHERIES RESEARCH INSTITUTE (Indian Council of Agricultural Research) P.B. No. 1603, Kochi – 682 018, Kerala, India. December, 2009. Declaration I do hereby declare that the thesis entitled “Population genetic structure of indigenous ornamental teleosts, Puntius denisonii and Puntius chalakkudiensis from the Western Ghats, India” is the authentic and bonafide record of the research work carried out by me under the guidance of Dr. A. Gopalakrishnan, Principal Scientist and SIC, National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources (NBFGR) Cochin Unit, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Cochin in partial fulfillment for the award of Ph.D. degree under the Faculty of Marine Sciences of Cochin University of Science and Technology, Cochin and no part thereof has been previously formed the basis for the award of any degree, diploma, associateship, fellowship or other similar titles or recognition. Cochin (Lijo John) 16th December 2009 ®É¹]ÅÒªÉ ¨ÉiºªÉ +ÉxÉÖÖ´ÉÆÆÎ¶ÉE ºÉÆÆºÉÉvÉxÉ ¤ªÉÚ®Éä NATIONAL BUREAU OF FISH GENETIC RESOURCES NBFGR Cochin Unit, CMFRI Campus, P.B. No. 1603, Cochin-682 018, Kerala, India Fax: (0484) 2395570; E-mail: [email protected] Dr. A. Gopalakrishnan, Date: 16.12.2009 Principal Scientist, Officer-in-Charge & Supervising Teacher Certificate This is to certify that this thesis entitled, “Population genetic structure of indigenous ornamental teleosts, Puntius denisonii and Puntius chalakkudiensis from the Western Ghats, India” is an authentic record of original and bonafide research work carried out by Mr. -
Download Download
ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) Journal of Threatened Taxa 26 May 2019 (Online & Print) Vol. 11 | No. 7 | 13815–13950 PLATINUM 10.11609/jott.2019.11.7.13815-13950 OPEN www.threatenedtaxa.org ACCESS J Building TTevidence for conservation globally ISSN 0974-7907 (Online); ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) Publisher Host Wildlife Information Liaison Development Society Zoo Outreach Organization www.wild.zooreach.org www.zooreach.org No. 12, Thiruvannamalai Nagar, Saravanampatti - Kalapatti Road, Saravanampatti, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641035, India Ph: +91 9385339863 | www.threatenedtaxa.org Email: [email protected] EDITORS Typesetting Founder & Chief Editor Mr. Arul Jagadish, ZOO, Coimbatore, India Dr. Sanjay Molur Mrs. Radhika, ZOO, Coimbatore, India Wildlife Information Liaison Development (WILD) Society & Zoo Outreach Organization (ZOO), Mrs. Geetha, ZOO, Coimbatore India 12 Thiruvannamalai Nagar, Saravanampatti, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641035, India Mr. Ravindran, ZOO, Coimbatore India Deputy Chief Editor Fundraising/Communications Dr. Neelesh Dahanukar Mrs. Payal B. Molur, Coimbatore, India Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), Pune, Maharashtra, India Editors/Reviewers Managing Editor Subject Editors 2016-2018 Mr. B. Ravichandran, WILD, Coimbatore, India Fungi Associate Editors Dr. B.A. Daniel, ZOO, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641035, India Dr. B. Shivaraju, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India Ms. Priyanka Iyer, ZOO, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641035, India Prof. Richard Kiprono Mibey, Vice Chancellor, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya Dr. Mandar Paingankar, Department of Zoology, Government Science College Gadchiroli, Dr. R.K. Verma, Tropical Forest Research Institute, Jabalpur, India Chamorshi Road, Gadchiroli, Maharashtra 442605, India Dr. V.B. Hosagoudar, Bilagi, Bagalkot, India Dr. Ulrike Streicher, Wildlife Veterinarian, Eugene, Oregon, USA Dr. Vatsavaya S. -
Kyfishid[1].Pdf
Kentucky Fishes Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources Kentucky Fish & Wildlife’s Mission To conserve, protect and enhance Kentucky’s fish and wildlife resources and provide outstanding opportunities for hunting, fishing, trapping, boating, shooting sports, wildlife viewing, and related activities. Federal Aid Project funded by your purchase of fishing equipment and motor boat fuels Kentucky Department of Fish & Wildlife Resources #1 Sportsman’s Lane, Frankfort, KY 40601 1-800-858-1549 • fw.ky.gov Kentucky Fish & Wildlife’s Mission Kentucky Fishes by Matthew R. Thomas Fisheries Program Coordinator 2011 (Third edition, 2021) Kentucky Department of Fish & Wildlife Resources Division of Fisheries Cover paintings by Rick Hill • Publication design by Adrienne Yancy Preface entucky is home to a total of 245 native fish species with an additional 24 that have been introduced either intentionally (i.e., for sport) or accidentally. Within Kthe United States, Kentucky’s native freshwater fish diversity is exceeded only by Alabama and Tennessee. This high diversity of native fishes corresponds to an abun- dance of water bodies and wide variety of aquatic habitats across the state – from swift upland streams to large sluggish rivers, oxbow lakes, and wetlands. Approximately 25 species are most frequently caught by anglers either for sport or food. Many of these species occur in streams and rivers statewide, while several are routinely stocked in public and private water bodies across the state, especially ponds and reservoirs. The largest proportion of Kentucky’s fish fauna (80%) includes darters, minnows, suckers, madtoms, smaller sunfishes, and other groups (e.g., lam- preys) that are rarely seen by most people. -
New Host Records for Lernaea Cyprinacea (Copepoda), a Parasite of Freshwater Fishes, with a Checklist of the Lernaeidae in Japan (1915-2007)
J. Grad. Sch. Biosp. Sci. Hiroshima Univ. (2007), 46:21~33 New Host Records for Lernaea cyprinacea (Copepoda), a Parasite of Freshwater Fishes, with a Checklist of the Lernaeidae in Japan (1915-2007) Kazuya Nagasawa, Akiko Inoue, Su Myat and Tetsuya Umino Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University 1-4-4 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8528, Japan Abstract The lernaeid copepod Lernaea cyprinacea Linnaeus, 1758, was found attached to three species of freshwater fishes, the barbell steed Hemibarbus labeo (Pallas) (Cyprinidae), the dark chub Zacco temminckii (Temminck and Schlegel) (Cyprinidae), and the Amur catfish Silurus asotus Linnaeus (Siluridae) from Hiroshima Prefecture in Japan. The findings from Hemibarbus labeo and Zacco temminckii represent new host records for L. cyprinacea, while Silurus asotus is a new host in Japan. Based on the literature published for 93 years from 1915 to 2007, a checklist of three species of lernaeid copepods (Lernaea cyprinacea, Lernaea parasiluri, Lamproglena chinensis) from Japan is given, including information on the synonym(s), host(s), site(s) of infection, and distribution. The checklist shows that in Japan L. cyprinacea has been reported from 33 or 34 species and subspecies of fishes belonging to 17 families in 10 orders and also from 2 species of amphibians from 2 families in 2 orders. Key words: Lamproglena chinensis; Lernaea cyprinacea; Lernaea parasiluri; Lernaeidae; parasites; new hosts INTRODUCTION The lernaeid copepod Lernaea cyprinacea Linnaeus, 1758, often called the anchor worm, is a parasite of freshwater fishes in various regions of the world (Kabata, 1979; Lester and Hayward, 2006). The anterior part of the body of metamorphosed adult female is embedded in the host tissue, whereas the remaining body protrudes in the water. -
Distribution Changes of Small Fishes in Streams of Missouri from The
Distribution Changes of Small Fishes in Streams of Missouri from the 1940s to the 1990s by MATTHEW R. WINSTON Missouri Department of Conservation, Columbia, MO 65201 February 2003 CONTENTS Page Abstract……………………………………………………………………………….. 8 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………… 10 Methods……………………………………………………………………………….. 17 The Data Used………………………………………………………………… 17 General Patterns in Species Change…………………………………………... 23 Conservation Status of Species……………………………………………….. 26 Results………………………………………………………………………………… 34 General Patterns in Species Change………………………………………….. 30 Conservation Status of Species……………………………………………….. 46 Discussion…………………………………………………………………………….. 63 General Patterns in Species Change………………………………………….. 53 Conservation Status of Species………………………………………………. 63 Acknowledgments……………………………………………………………………. 66 Literature Cited……………………………………………………………………….. 66 Appendix……………………………………………………………………………… 72 FIGURES 1. Distribution of samples by principal investigator…………………………. 20 2. Areas of greatest average decline…………………………………………. 33 3. Areas of greatest average expansion………………………………………. 34 4. The relationship between number of basins and ……………………….. 39 5. The distribution of for each reproductive group………………………... 40 2 6. The distribution of for each family……………………………………… 41 7. The distribution of for each trophic group……………...………………. 42 8. The distribution of for each faunal region………………………………. 43 9. The distribution of for each stream type………………………………… 44 10. The distribution of for each range edge…………………………………. 45 11. Modified -
Eureka, Topeka! (Shiner, That Is)
B 3 American Currents Vol. 40, No. 2 EUREKA, TOPEKA! (SHINER, THAT IS) Ray Katula Onalaska, WI One magnificent aspect of the fish-keeping hobby is that of the more common and well-known Red Shiner (Cypri- with all the biodiversity Mother Earth has to offer, there is nella lutrensis). Fins of the male Topeka Shiner can be cherry little danger of becoming jaded about it. An enlightening red with fin bases usually clear. Nuptial males display more surprise always seems to appear around the next bend, or red within the fins and a faint blue lateral stripe that replaces in the next stream or pet shop. After more than forty years the black one. They also have a rosy cheek. During peak col- of keeping and breeding North American native fishes, my oration, the fish’s whole side has a blue luminance. Nuptial enthusiasm has not diminished, and the Topeka Shiner (No- males—as in most minnow species—develop small breed- tropis topeka) is an endearing case in point. ing tubercles on the forehead (Figure 1). One last marking In 1996 NANFA member Konrad Schmidt sent me a worthy of mention is a small black wedge mark, or chevron, baker’s dozen of young-of-the-year Topeka Shiners, which located at the caudal fin base. Typical of many North Ameri- he caught in the Rock River in southwestern Minnesota. Up can minnow species, males can attain chromatic nuptial col- to that point, the only photographs and illustrations I had ors that fade to varying degrees outside the spawning sea- seen of Topeka Shiners showed a fair amount of red in their son. -
Report of Rapid Biodiversity Assessments at Jiulianshan Nature Reserve, South Jiangxi, China, 2000, 2001 and 2003
Report of Rapid Biodiversity Assessments at Jiulianshan Nature Reserve, South Jiangxi, China, 2000, 2001 and 2003 Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden in collaboration with Jiulianshan Nature Reserve (Jiangxi Provincial Forestry Department) South China Institute of Botany South China Normal University July 2003 South China Forest Biodiversity Survey Report Series: No. 33 (Online Simplified Version) Report of Rapid Biodiversity Assessments at Jiulianshan Nature Reserve, South Jiangxi, China, 2000, 2001 and 2003 Editors John R. Fellowes, Bosco P.L. Chan, Michael W.N. Lau, and Ng Sai-Chit Contributors Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden: Bosco P.L. Chan (BC) Lee Kwok Shing (LKS) Ng Sai-Chit (NSC) John R. Fellowes (JRF) Billy C.H. Hau (BH) Michael W.N. Lau (ML) Captain Wong (CW) Jiangxi Provincial Forestry Department (Jiulianshan Tang Peirong (TPR) Nature Reserve): Chen Zhigao (CZG) Liao Chengkai (LCK) Mr. Wang (WA) Wu Songbao (WSB) South China Institute of Botany: Chen Zhongyi (CZY) Chen Binghui (CBH) South China Normal University: Du Hejun (DHJ) Xiao Zhi (XZ) Chen Xianglin (CXL) Guangxi Normal University: Zhou Shanyi (ZSY) Huang Jianhua (HJH) Xinyang Teachers’ College: Li Hongjing (LHJ) Chebaling National Nature Reserve, Guangdong: Huang Shilin (HSL) Station Biologique, La Tour du Valat: Olivier Pineau (OP) World Wide Fund for Nature Hong Kong: Samson So (SS) Voluntary specialists: Graham T. Reels (GTR) Keith D.P. Wilson (KW) Background The present report details the findings of visits to South Jiangxi by members of Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden (KFBG) in Hong Kong and their colleagues, as part of KFBG's South China Biodiversity Conservation Programme. The overall aim of the programme is to minimise the loss of forest biodiversity in the region, and the emphasis in the first phase is on gathering up-to-date information on the distribution and status of fauna and flora.