From Agnatic Succession to Absolute Primogeniture: the Shift to Equal Rights of Succession to Thrones and Titles in the Modern European Constitutional Monarchy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Louisiana State University Law Center LSU Law Digital Commons Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 2012 From Agnatic Succession to Absolute Primogeniture: The Shift to Equal Rights of Succession to Thrones and Titles in the Modern European Constitutional Monarchy Christine Corcos Louisiana State University Law Center, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Law Commons Repository Citation Corcos, Christine, "From Agnatic Succession to Absolute Primogeniture: The Shift to Equal Rights of Succession to Thrones and Titles in the Modern European Constitutional Monarchy" (2012). Journal Articles. 326. https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/faculty_scholarship/326 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FROM AGNA TIC SUCCESSION TO ABSOLUTE PRIMOGENITURE: THE SHIFT TO EQUAL RIGHTS OF SUCCESSION TO THRONES AND TITLES IN THE MODERN EUROPEAN CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY Christine Alice Coreas* 2012 MICH. ST. L. REV. 1587 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................... ............................................. .................. 1588 I. TYPES OF HEREDITARY SUCCESSION ............................. .................. 1598 A. Rules of Inheritance and Their Purposes ................................... 1598 B. Agnatic Succession .... ...................... .......................................... 1602 C. Male Primogeniture .......................... ................ .................... .... 1603 D. Elective Succession (Elective Monarchy) ............. .................... 1606 E. Other Theories of Succession ............. ...................... ...... .......... 1609 1. Succession Through Marriage . ..... ... ......... ........ .......... .. .. .. 1609 2. Ultimogeniture .... .......... .... ..... .. ........ ....... ... .. ..... .. ... .. ... ....... 1610 II. TRADITIONAL OBJECTIONS TO FEMALE RULE .................................. 1611 A. The Queen Regnant as Wife ...................................................... 1611 B. The Female as Heir .......... .................... .. ............... ...... ............... 1618 III. CHANGES IN SUCCESSION RULES AND THE SHIFT TO COGNA TIC SUCCESSION .. ·········· ... ····· ......... ... ....... .... ......... ..... ........... 1624 A. Sweden .......................................... ..................... ....................... 1624 B. Norway ...................................................................................... 1625 C. The Netherlands............. ..................... .......... ............. .. ............ 1626 D. Belgium ..... ....... .................... ........................................ ........... .. 1628 E. Denmark ................................... ............ ........................ ........ .....1629 F. Luxembourg .............................. .. .............................................. 1630 G. The Disenchantment with Male Primogeniture ......................... 1632 IV. A CLOSER LOOK AT THE TRANSITION FROM MALE PRIMOGENITURE * Associate Professor of Law, Louisiana State University Law Center; Associate Professor, Women's and Gender Studies Program, Louisiana State University A&M. Thanks to Alain Levasseur and Olivier Moreteau, Professors of Law, Louisiana State University Law Center, for helpful discussion of Civil Code issues; Jennifer Lane, Coordinator, Center of Civil Law Studies, for assistance with translations from Spanish language documents; and Susan Gualtier, Foreign, Comparative, and International Law Librarian, LSU Law Center Library, and Danielle Goren (LSU Law 2012) for research assistance. 1588 Michigan State Law Review Vol. 2012:1587 TO ABSOLUTE SUCCESSION: THE SITUATION IN SPAIN AND THE UK.... .... ........ ............................................................................ ....... 1635 A. Spain ..........................................................................................1635 1. The Current Situation in Spain: Male Primogeniture Under the Spanish Constitution. ................ ... .. .... .... .... ... 1635 B. The Situation in the United Kingdom..... ..... ................... .. .. .. 1650 1. The Succession to the Throne.. .................. .. ...... ... .... ...... 1650 2. Titles of Nobility... .... ................ .... ... ............ ... .. .... .. ..... .... 1653 C. European Union Directives, Gender Discrimination, and Absolute Primogeniture in the Matter of the Inheritance of Titles ..... ..... .... .......... .. ..... ................... .... .. ... ........ .... ...... .. .. .. 1658 D. Undecided and Unresolved Problems.... ............................. .... 1662 1. The Spouse's Title ...... .. .............. ........ ...... .... ...... .... .... ... 1662 2. Finances and Divorces. .... ......... ..... .. ..... .............. .. .......... 1666 CONCLUSION ........................................ .................................................... 1668 INTRODUCTION On October 28, 2011, the heads of the British Commonwealth member states agreed to remove barriers to the succession of the first-born child of the sovereign, whether male or female, to the throne of the United King dom. 1 Such a rule-the rule of absolute, or full (cognatic) primogeniture2- ensures that the oldest child, regardless of gender, inherits the crown. In addition, the heads of state agreed to remove the bar to the marriage of members of the Royal Family to Catholics,3 although the sovereign cannot be a Catholic, since the King or Queen of the United Kingdom is the head of the Church of England.4 The media reported little, if any, opposition to l. John F. Burns, British Monarchy Scraps Rule of Male Succession in New Step to Modernization, N.Y. TIMES, Oct. 29, 2011, at A4. The change was head-snapping. In 2008, the British government abandoned an attempt to change succession rules only a week after planning to introduce the Single Equality Bill. See Andrew Pierce, U-Turn on Royal Succes sion Law Change, The Telegraph, Apr. 28, 2008, at http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ uknews/theroyalfamily/1905565/U-tum-on-royal-succession-law-change.html (visited April 12, 2013). 2. As opposed to ordinary primogeniture, where the firstborn son inherits the estate "to the exclusion of younger siblings." BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY 1311 (9th ed. 2009). an 3. For extensive discussion of the mechanisms involved in changing the various statutes involved in the Commonwealth countries, see generally Anne Twomey, Changing the Rules of Succe �sion to the Throne (Sydney Law Sch. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11171, 2011) [heremafter Twomey, Changing the Rules], available at http://papers.ssrn.com/ sol3/papers.cfin?abstract_id=l 943287; Anne Twomey, The Australian Crowns and the Rules of Succession, QUADRANT, June 2009, at 44-45. 4. See Burns, supra note I, at A4. From Agnatic Succession to Absolute Primogeniture 1589 the decision.5 Indulging in some enthusiastic alternative historical "what-if ing" the Daily Mail chirruped: If the new rules had been in force in 1509 Margaret Tudor would have taken the throne instead of Henry VIII. That could have meant the Refonnation would never have taken place and Elizabeth I would never have been Queen. If the practice had been changed as recently as the last century, Britain could have had two Queen Victorias back to back. Princess Victoria, the Princess Royal would have acceded to the throne in 190 I instead of King Edward VII. When she died just a few months later, her son Kaiser Wilhelm II would have ascended the throne something which could have prevented the First World War. The Queen of Eng land now would have been the completely unknown Princess Marie Cecile of Prus- Sia.. 6 While under these rules Margaret, the oldest surviving child, and older surviving daughter, of Henry VII, would have succeeded him,7 the likeli hood that the England of Tudor times would have put these rules into place is nil. But suppose we play the game. Had absolute primogeniture been the rule, one cannot necessarily assume that the Reformation might not have touched England's shores. While Henry VIII turned to the Protestant faith in part because it promised him a solution to the sticky problem of divorce, the Protestant religious revolution attracted others dissatisfied with the Roman Catholic Church, including many in England as well as on the continent. 8 To suggest that it would have no influence (rather than less influence) in England is a rather large leap. 5. Girls Equal in British Throne Succession, BBC NEWS (Oct. 28, 2011), http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-I 5492607. 6. Tim Shipman & Damien Gayle, If Wills and Kate Have a Girl First, She 'II Be Queen! Commonwealth Agrees Historic Change to Give Sex Equality in Royal Succession, MAIL ONLINE (Oct. 28, 2011), http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2054467 /UK.-royal succession-laws-Commonwealth-agrees-historic-change-sex-equality.html. The article's title is perhaps overly optimistic as well, since this hypothetical first-born daughter has to materi alize, and has to outlive both her father and live to see the continuation of the monarchy. See id. 7. On the life of Margaret Tudor, see MARJA PERRY, THE SISTERS OF HENRY VIII: THE TUMULTUOUS LIVES OF MARGARET OF SCOTLAND AND MARY OF FRANCE ( 1998). Marga ret married as her first husband James TV