Littleton's Tenures in English;

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Littleton's Tenures in English; UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES SCHOOL OF LAW LIBRARY If? S/S196 xog O OC9U SS300V vion Q3AI303a SM z 3na M -mv zooz SBM i! qojq/w uioj^ Ajejqjj aq) O) (euaieiu siqj ujn;ay 889I.-S6006 VINUOdHVO 'S3H30NV SOT 88tS6 xog . zuon Bu^JBd - 3AUQ BABN a 90S Advusn IVNOIOBU ]0 OLegal Classic Series LITTLETON'S TENURES Xegal Classic Series QLANV1LLE Introduction by Joseph Henry Beale, Jr., A.M., LL.B. BRITTON Introduction by Hon. Simeon L. Baldwin, LL.D. LITTLETON'S TENURES Introduction by Eugene Wambaugh, LL.D. MIRROUR OF JUSTICES Introduction by Hon. William C. Robinson, LL.D. LITTLETON'S TENURES IN ENGLISH EDITED BY EUGENE WAMBAUGH, LL.D. PROFESSOR OP LAW IN HARVARD UNIVERSITY WASHINGTON, D. C. JOHN BYRNE & CO. LAW PUBLISHERS AND BOOKSELLERS 1903 1903 COPYRIGHT. 1903, BY JOHN BYRNE & CO. THIS EDITION IS DEDICATED TO THE LEARNED SOCIETY WHEREIN LITTLETON FOR MORE THAN FOUR HUNDRED YEARS HAS BEEN REGARDED WITH PECULIAR VENERATION- CONTENTS. PAGE PREFACE V INTRODUCTION I. Biography xi II. Bibliography Ixvii THE TENURES. BOOK I. CHAPTER PAGK I. Fee Simple 1 II. Fee Tail 7 III. Tenants in Tail after Possibility, etc 13 IV. Curtesy of England 15 V. Dower 16 VI. Tenant for Life ;. 24 VII. Tenant for Years 26 VIII. Tenant at Will 31 IX. Tenant by Copy 33 X. Tenant by the Verge 36 BOOK II. I. Homage 39 II. Fealty 43 III. Escuage 45 IV. Knight's Service 49 V. Socage 58 VI. Frankalmoign 66 6 CONTENTS. PACK VTL Homage Ancestral 71 VIII. Grand Serjeanty 75 IX. Petit Serjeanty 78 X. Tenure in Burgage 79 XI. VUlenage 84 XH. Rents. 100 BOOK m. I. Parceners 112 n. Parceners by Custom 122 HI. Joint-tenants 129 IV. Tenants in Common 137 V. Estates upon Condition 153 VI. Descents which Toll Entries 185 VII. Continual Claim 197 VIII. Releases 212 IX. Confirmation 239 X. Attornment 251 XI. Discontinuance 269 XH. Remitter 293 Xm. Warranty 312 Tabula 339 Epilogus 341 PREFACE. UNFORTUNATELY, it is not possible to fix the exact date of Sir Thomas Littleton's birth but the was ; year certainly in the earliest part of the fifteenth century, and thus this edition of The Tenures serves to commem- orate though, doubtless, only approximately the five hundredth anniversary. The occasion obviously makes it proper to present a somewhat elaborate account of the author's life and to give as complete a list as practicable of the editions of this book. Hence, in a search for facts or points of view heretofore possibly overlooked, much time has been spent in the neighborhoods where Littleton lived and worked, and still more time with manuscripts and printed books in many hospitable libraries. Yet while it has seemed appropriate to prepare thus a new biographical and bibliographical introduction, it has seemed equally requisite not to give a new trans- lation, but simply to edit the translation adopted by Coke. This familiar version, to be sure, is not perfect. v PREFACE. vi It appears to be chiefly a reprint of the work of some early and rather unscholarly translator, with merely such modernization in language as was required by the taste of Coke's day. It contains even more numerous interpolations than are pointed out by Coke himself. It omits many authentic passages. Now and then it mistranslates. Nevertheless it has several strong rec- ommendations. To begin with a matter of form, this version is expressed in an archaic phraseology peculiarly appropriate for such a book, and, fortunately, the only archaic phraseology with which all present readers may fairly be expected to be acquainted the diction of Shakespeare and of the King James Bible. To pass to a more practical point, this version long ago became the standard representative of the words of Littleton, and it has been quoted in countless arguments and opin- treaties in an edition intended as ions and ; and hence, is this present edition to be as serviceable as pos- sible to the profession, this common version should be followed, unless, indeed, such a course will lead to harm. To come finally to matter of substance, upon careful examination this version, while open to criticism as already indicated, has been found to give almost inva- riably an accurate view of the author's meaning. These, then, are the reasons for deciding to reprint, with neither omission nor addition, the now venerable stan- dard version as given in Coke upon Littleton, and to insert such marks and foot-notes as will enable the PREFACE. Vii reader to make amendments, if he wishes, in accord- ance with the most trustworthy editions in Law French. No changes have been made in the text, with the ex- ceptions that antique punctuation and capitalization and spelling have not always been preserved, and that a very few peculiarly annoying mistranslations, based upon mere misprints and the like, have been corrected in instances which the foot-notes fully explain. Pas- sages believed to be spurious have been inclosed in brackets. Passages that ought to be inserted have been printed in the foot-notes, and have been there inclosed in braces. Many other amendments have been sug- gested in the foot-notes. The rule has been to disre- gard matters of no appreciable importance; but old- fashioned standards have sometimes been taken into ac- count in deciding what is important, and thus it has " " " " happened that variations as to item and nota and " &c." have received attention in accordance with the views emphatically expressed by one whom an editor of Littleton learns to respect more and more Sir Ed- ward Coke. E. W. January 1, 1903. INTRODUCTION. I. BIOGRAPHY. ONE of the most famous books ever written is this small volume containing an orderly and exact presen- tation of land law at the time midway between the Nor- man Conquest and the present day. There have been so many changes in the law that doubtless many lawyers consider this treatise obsolete. Yet land law is al- tered less rapidly and less radically than other branches, and this is one reason why this little classic has outlived the author four centuries and even if the of by ; lapse time had rendered the work useless as an introduc- tion to existing law, its arrangement, conciseness, and accuracy would continue to gain for it the favor of any one who appreciates a masterpiece. Littleton is far from being either the earliest or the latest of the great legal authors. Glanville, Bracton, Littleton, Coke, Blackstone: these are the five masters. The approximate dates of these five writers are strangely easy for an American lawyer to bear in mind. Glan- xi x ii INTRODUCTION. ville wrote just before, and Bracton just after, the sign- ing of Magna Charta gave a starting point for Amer- ican constitutional law. Littleton wrote just before the discovery of America created the possibility that not merely a few islands but the greater part of the world may be governed by law that had its earliest home in England. Coke wrote in the time of Elizabeth and the first two Stuarts, when Shakespeare and Bacon and the King James version of the Bible were unconsciously laying the foundations of American thought and letters, and when the colonists of Virginia and New England were bringing the English law to its new and larger home. Finally, Blackstone wrote just before the ideals encouraged by religion, literature, and the law resulted in American independence. Although Littleton stands third in chronological order among the five famous authors named, there is one point of view from which he may fairly be called the earliest writer the law of great upon England ; for, whereas in form or in phraseology, though not in es- sence, the works of Glanville and Bracton are some- what affected by Justinian's Institutes, this treatise by Littleton is wholly free from any tincture of the law of Rome. In short, this is the first important law book that is thoroughly English. Ap- parently, Roman law was not studied by Little- ton. The reason for the appearance of a distinctly na- tional book is not difficult to find. The reforms of INTRODUCTION. Henry the Second, Edward the First, and Edward the Third had resulted in a fairly complete system. The land law had always been largely the mere local law of England; and it became still more strictly local 1 through Magna Charta, and the statutes of Merton, of 2 3 Westminster I., of Gloucester, of Westminster II. (De donis 4 of III. conditionalibus) , and Westminster 5 (Quia emptores}. The development of a systematic body of law had been still further aided by the Year Books. Finally, the growth of the inns of court, which date either their foundation or their conspicuous im- portance from the fourteenth century, had furnished an organized profession, studying the English law in both a practical and a scientific spirit. The inevitable re- sult must have been before long a law book that should be English through and through a book built upon the author's own perception of practices actually existing and upon his knowledge of English statutes and of Eng- lish decisions. Enough is known of Littleton's professional career to explain how he happened to be well fitted to write a little is known of his his such book ; but birth, early training, his character, and, in short, of the man him- self. In the neighborhood called Frankley, six miles south- west of the center of a peculiarly modern city, Birming- 8 i 20 H. III. (1235-6). 2 3 E. I. (1275).
Recommended publications
  • How Useful Are Episcopal Ordination Lists As a Source for Medieval English Monastic History?
    Jnl of Ecclesiastical History, Vol. , No. , July . © Cambridge University Press doi:./S How Useful are Episcopal Ordination Lists as a Source for Medieval English Monastic History? by DAVID E. THORNTON Bilkent University, Ankara E-mail: [email protected] This article evaluates ordination lists preserved in bishops’ registers from late medieval England as evidence for the monastic orders, with special reference to religious houses in the diocese of Worcester, from to . By comparing almost , ordination records collected from registers from Worcester and neighbouring dioceses with ‘conven- tual’ lists, it is concluded that over per cent of monks and canons are not named in the extant ordination lists. Over half of these omissions are arguably due to structural gaps in the surviving ordination lists, but other, non-structural factors may also have contributed. ith the dispersal and destruction of the archives of religious houses following their dissolution in the late s, many docu- W ments that would otherwise facilitate the prosopographical study of the monastic orders in late medieval England and Wales have been irre- trievably lost. Surviving sources such as the profession and obituary lists from Christ Church Canterbury and the records of admissions in the BL = British Library, London; Bodl. Lib. = Bodleian Library, Oxford; BRUO = A. B. Emden, A biographical register of the University of Oxford to A.D. , Oxford –; CAP = Collectanea Anglo-Premonstratensia, London ; DKR = Annual report of the Deputy Keeper of the Public Records, London –; FOR = Faculty Office Register, –, ed. D. S. Chambers, Oxford ; GCL = Gloucester Cathedral Library; LP = J. S. Brewer and others, Letters and papers, foreign and domestic, of the reign of Henry VIII, London –; LPL = Lambeth Palace Library, London; MA = W.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Legal Traditions 00 Head GLT Final 3/31/11 11:29 AM Page Ii 00 Head GLT Final 3/31/11 11:29 AM Page Iii
    00 head GLT final 3/31/11 11:29 AM Page i Great Legal Traditions 00 head GLT final 3/31/11 11:29 AM Page ii 00 head GLT final 3/31/11 11:29 AM Page iii Great Legal Traditions Civil Law, Common Law, and Chinese Law in Historical and Operational Perspective John W. Head Robert W. Wagstaff Distinguished Professor of Law University of Kansas Carolina Academic Press Durham, North Carolina 00 head GLT final 4/11/11 2:59 PM Page iv Copyright © 2011 John W. Head All Rights Reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Head, John W. (John Warren), 1953- Great legal traditions : civil law, common law, and Chinese law in historical and oper- ational perspective / John W. Head. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-59460-957-2 (alk. paper) 1. Comparative law. 2. Civil law. 3. Common law. 4. Law--China I. Title. K583.H43 2011 340'.2--dc22 2010053972 Front Cover— The three images on the left represent the rich historical background of the three great legal traditions discussed in this book: Confucius contributed to the found- ing of the Chinese legal tradition with his use of the Zhou lĭ to prescribe a form of social governance that would contribute to cosmic harmony; Constantine, in addition to facil- itating the Christianization of the Roman Empire, also founded the eastern capital of the Empire — Constantinople — from which Justinian would issue his great Corpus Juris Civilis in the sixth century; Blackstone, with his Commentaries on the Laws of England, helped preserve the vitality of the common law by making it accessible to practitioners both in England and the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Dudley Business Group
    DUDLEY BOROUGH LOCAL ACCESS FORUM Monday 16th March, 2009 at 6.30pm in Committee Room 4 at the Council House, Priory Road, Dudley PRESENT: - Mr M Freer (Chairman) Mr D Woodruff (Vice-Chairman) Mr T Antill, Mr D Bates, Mr R Burgess (for part of the meeting only), Mr A Cutler, Mr D Davies, Mrs C Freer and Mr R Vickers. Officers: Ms A Roberts – Planning Policy Manager and Mr R Whitehouse - Senior Planning Policy Officer, (Both Directorate of the Urban Environment) and Miss K Fellows – Democratic Services Officer, (Directorate of Law and Property). Also in Attendance: Ms C Davies and Mrs S Davies, residents from Leasowes, Ms M Diller representative of Friends of Leasowes and Mr C Leech representative from Groundwork Black Country. 36. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Apologies for absence from the meeting were submitted on behalf of Mr J Butler, Councillor T Crumpton and Mr N Williams. 37. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST The Chairman declared a personal interest in agenda item no. 8 – Treherns Farm Public Enquiry, as he remains a member of the Forum and the Halesowen Abbey Trust. Mr Antill declared a personal interest in relation to agenda item no. 5 – Comments by the Chairman, agenda item no. 8 – Treherns Farm Public Enquiry and agenda item no. 11 – Closure of section of path providing access to the canal and the Leasowes, as he was the founder and remains a member of The Monarch’s Way Association and Mr A Cutler declared a personal interest in agenda item no. 12(b) – Gating Orders – Murcroft/Wychbury Road, as he had a relative who resides within close proximity to the vicinity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transport System of Medieval England and Wales
    THE TRANSPORT SYSTEM OF MEDIEVAL ENGLAND AND WALES - A GEOGRAPHICAL SYNTHESIS by James Frederick Edwards M.Sc., Dip.Eng.,C.Eng.,M.I.Mech.E., LRCATS A Thesis presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Salford Department of Geography 1987 1. CONTENTS Page, List of Tables iv List of Figures A Note on References Acknowledgements ix Abstract xi PART ONE INTRODUCTION 1 Chapter One: Setting Out 2 Chapter Two: Previous Research 11 PART TWO THE MEDIEVAL ROAD NETWORK 28 Introduction 29 Chapter Three: Cartographic Evidence 31 Chapter Four: The Evidence of Royal Itineraries 47 Chapter Five: Premonstratensian Itineraries from 62 Titchfield Abbey Chapter Six: The Significance of the Titchfield 74 Abbey Itineraries Chapter Seven: Some Further Evidence 89 Chapter Eight: The Basic Medieval Road Network 99 Conclusions 11? Page PART THREE THr NAVIGABLE MEDIEVAL WATERWAYS 115 Introduction 116 Chapter Hine: The Rivers of Horth-Fastern England 122 Chapter Ten: The Rivers of Yorkshire 142 Chapter Eleven: The Trent and the other Rivers of 180 Central Eastern England Chapter Twelve: The Rivers of the Fens 212 Chapter Thirteen: The Rivers of the Coast of East Anglia 238 Chapter Fourteen: The River Thames and Its Tributaries 265 Chapter Fifteen: The Rivers of the South Coast of England 298 Chapter Sixteen: The Rivers of South-Western England 315 Chapter Seventeen: The River Severn and Its Tributaries 330 Chapter Eighteen: The Rivers of Wales 348 Chapter Nineteen: The Rivers of North-Western England 362 Chapter Twenty: The Navigable Rivers of
    [Show full text]
  • Common Law Judicial Office, Sovereignty, and the Church Of
    1 Common Law Judicial Office, Sovereignty, and the Church of England in Restoration England, 1660-1688 David Kearns Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences The University of Sydney A thesis submitted to fulfil requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2019 2 This is to certify that to the best of my knowledge, the content of this thesis is my own work. This thesis has not been submitted for any degree or other purposes. I certify that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work and that all the assistance received in preparing this thesis and sources have been acknowledged. David Kearns 29/06/2019 3 Authorship Attribution Statement This thesis contains material published in David Kearns, ‘Sovereignty and Common Law Judicial Office in Taylor’s Case (1675)’, Law and History Review, 37:2 (2019), 397-429, and material to be published in David Kearns and Ryan Walter, ‘Office, Political Theory, and the Political Theorist’, The Historical Journal (forthcoming). The research for these articles was undertaken as part of the research for this thesis. I am the sole author of the first article and sole author of section I of the co-authored article, and it is the research underpinning section I that appears in the thesis. David Kearns 29/06/2019 As supervisor for the candidature upon which this thesis is based, I can confirm that the authorship attribution statements above are correct. Andrew Fitzmaurice 29/06/2019 4 Acknowledgements Many debts have been incurred in the writing of this thesis, and these acknowledgements must necessarily be a poor repayment for the assistance that has made it possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Dudley and Sandwell MG
    H V N A O E U gg M I E 334 O L R L H R L S O N A NL L G A D U R N D I A I A V EE N School R U H E R N O 310 N T 637 T A R 26 27 R I L V E N C G CUMB ERLA B L H A D D E O S Green Priestfield M A Heath G 4 S DE A E E 64 R L O Walsall Campus R D H R T 39 34A K E DARLASTON LV LAK H 637 45 E O W D R E V C L 26A 27A D E A C R E L 63 N . O 23.26A.34 334 74 A A R T G S 4H S N 34 H of University of I R S 77 G 23 O W U W O 334 57 R SLATER’S E 63 R O 23 L LA. 401E S N 255 N 530 R 303 S RD E D N Y B 74 Y O A A O R R E O . A B H 4M Wolverhampton T T D L IX H A D P D 79 H T IC 256 34 R OUG LANGLF EY ROAD B V E G T E P A X U N R C . A D S Wolverhampton College S 34.37.310 T L N 637 R O E E OW . S R LL N A S A T.
    [Show full text]
  • Unenumerated Rights
    OKLAHOMA LAW REVIEW VOLUME 62 WINTER 2010 NUMBER 2 BLACKSTONE’S NINTH AMENDMENT: A HISTORICAL COMMON LAW BASELINE FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF UNENUMERATED RIGHTS JEFFREY D. JACKSON* Table of Contents Introduction .............................................. 167 I. Historically Construing the Ninth Amendment: Whose Views Are Important? ............................................ 172 II. The Ninth Amendment in Context: Whose Rights? . 175 A. The English Constitution and the Rule of Law . 176 B. The Influence of Natural Law ............................ 179 C. The Framing ......................................... 185 D. The Ratification....................................... 188 III. Whose Common Law? ................................... 200 IV. What Does It Mean?..................................... 212 A. Some Conclusions..................................... 214 B. And Some Criticisms................................ 220 Conclusion ............................................... 222 Introduction The Ninth Amendment explicitly states that “[t]he enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”1 This seems to clearly indicate that there are * Associate Professor of Law, Washburn University School of Law. I would like to thank Bill Rich, Bill Merkel, John Bickers, Linda Elrod, Aida Alaka, and Joe McKinney for their helpful comments and input on this article. Thanks also to Washburn University School of Law for its research support, and to Angela Carlon, J.D., 2009, and Karl Wenger, J.D., 2008, for their research and input. 1. U.S. CONST. amend. IX. 167 168 OKLAHOMA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 62:167 rights other than those in the text of the Constitution that should be recognized as constitutional. Further, the United States Supreme Court has recognized a number of unenumerated rights under a variety of rationales.2 Nevertheless, the question of how to identify and give form to these rights still continues to pose problems for judges, lawyers, and legal scholars alike.
    [Show full text]
  • Coombeswood Canal Trust
    Coombeswood SOME SITES OF INTEREST Canal Trust - GUIDE MAP No2 - Registered Charity No. 1088978 T2 - Heywood or Leasowes Embankment - Here the canal crosses the Leasowes Valley on a very high embankment rather than follow the natural contours. There are many theories as to why the designer of the Canal took this un- usual step; yet you may have one of your own, as you ponder and admire from the embank- T2 ment, the beautiful view over the Leasowes. Fig.1 Hawne Basin– Halesowen “Lapal Canal” (to be restored) “Monarch’s Way “COUNTRYSIDE WALKS” U Guide No2 To The Footpaths Z From Coombeswood, W with links to The Leasowes, V Selly Oak → Lapal Canal & Abbey Lands. Y Fig.3 “Fordrove Bridge circa 1955” U - Site of Fordrove Bridge - Here there was a “Abbey Lands” simple brick arched canal bridge, (demolished in the 1960’s), built originally to accommodate an old track way or ‘fordrough’ that once passed through the green fields from Webb’s Green Fig.2 “The Black Horse P.H. & Canal Bridge, Farm to Manor Lane (Way). Little evidence Manor Lane, circ 1915” X remains today of the bridge, track way or farm. (50p when sold) Guide Map No2 Leasowes, Lapal Canal & Abbey Lands - INTRODUCTION - Leaflet produced & published by In 1792 when the Dudley Canal Company pro- KEY Coombeswood Canal Trust © (2012) posed to extend their canal from Park Head, Public Right of Way—Definitive footpath & Hawne Basin, Hereward Rise, Halesowen, near Netherton to Selly Oak in Birmingham via reference number (where known) West Midlands, B62 8AW. (0121) 550 1355 Halesowen, it was to be ‘cut’ through open countryside.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Item No. 21 Halesowen Area Committee
    Agenda Item No. 21 Halesowen Area Committee – 1st July 2009 Report of the Area Liaison Officer Raising the Standard – a flag for Halesowen? Purpose of Report 1. To consider a proposal to adopt and have made a flag for Halesowen. Background 2. In March, Councillor Hill raised the prospect of a flag for Halesowen. He had been talking to a former Halesowen resident, a Mr. Philip Tibbetts, who had created a Halesowen Tartan and has also designed a Halesowen flag. Mr. Tibbetts is keen to have his flag design formally adopted so that it can be registered. The flag could also be used on appropriate occasions to promote the Town and to give it a sense of identity. The flag is included for information in the Appendix and a colour copy will be circulated at the Area Committee. 3. Mr. Tibbetts is a former Earls High pupil who no longer lives in the Borough. He says when designing the flag:- ”I had thought that counties had every right to a flag and following on that course of thinking it seemed only fair that towns and cities should have their own too. The flag takes on elements of Halesowen’s two coats of arms. The older arms probably are associated with Halesowen Abbey which was founded by Premonstratensian canons from France in 1215. The French influence can be seen in the blue field with the three golden fleur-de-lys upon which a white chevron is added. These arms can be seen repeatedly inside Halesowen Church and are also the basis for the emblems Halesowen Golf Club, The Earls High School (the old Grammar School) and Old Halesonians Rugby & Hockey clubs.” ”The second coat of arms was granted by the Royal College for the parish council in 1937 and can still be seen on benches in the town centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Site (Alphabetically)
    Sites which are FREE TO VISIT for Corporate Members Opening times vary, pre-booking may be required, please check English Heritage website for details. Site (alphabetically) County 1066 Battle of Hastings, Abbey and Battlefield East Sussex Abbotsbury Abbey Remains Dorset Acton Burnell Castle Shropshire Aldborough Roman Site North Yorkshire Alexander Keiller Museum Wiltshire Ambleside Roman Fort Cumbria Appuldurcombe House Isle of Wight Apsley House London Arthur's Stone Herefordshire Ashby de la Zouch Castle Leicestershire Auckland Castle Deer House Durham Audley End House and Gardens Essex Avebury Wiltshire Aydon Castle Northumberland Baconsthorpe Castle Norfolk Ballowall Barrow Cornwall Banks East Turret Cumbria Bant's Carn Burial Chamber and Halangy Isles of Scilly Barnard Castle Durham d's Cove Fort Devon Bayham Old Abbey Kent Beeston Castle Cheshire Belas Knap Long Barrow Gloucestershire Belsay Hall, Castle and Gardens Northumberland Benwell Roman Temple and Vallum Crossing Tyne and Wear Berkhamsted Castle Hertfordshire Berney Arms Windmill Hertfordshire Berry Pomeroy Castle Devon Berwick-upon-Tweed Castle, Barracks and Main Guard Northumberland Binham Market Cross Norfolk Binham Priory Norfolk Birdoswald Roman Fort Cumbria Bishop Waltham Palace Hampshire Black Carts Turret Northumberland Black Middens Bastle House Northumberland Blackbury Camp Devon Blackfriars, Gloucester Gloucestershire Blakeney Guildhall Norfolk Bolingbroke Castle Lincolnshire Bolsover Castle Derbyshire Bolsover Cundy House Derbyshire 1 Boscobel House and The
    [Show full text]
  • The Folly of Requiring Complete Knowledge of the Criminal Law
    Liberty University Law Review Volume 12 Issue 2 Article 4 January 2018 The Folly of Requiring Complete Knowledge of the Criminal Law Paul J. Larkin Jr. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lu_law_review Recommended Citation Larkin, Paul J. Jr. (2018) "The Folly of Requiring Complete Knowledge of the Criminal Law," Liberty University Law Review: Vol. 12 : Iss. 2 , Article 4. Available at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lu_law_review/vol12/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Liberty University School of Law at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Liberty University Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE THE FOLLY OF REQUIRING COMPLETE KNOWLEDGE OF THE CRIMINAL LAW Paul J. Larkin, Jr.† Some criminal law axioms represent moral judgments. A classic example is William Blackstone’s adage that “it is better that ten guilty persons escape, than that one innocent suffer.”1 That proposition does not represent an empirically proven conclusion. Blackstone did not make that claim, no one has proved it since then, the variables are too numerous for any attempt to be successful, and there are too many counterexamples for any proof to be persuasive. (What if among the ten guilty persons are Ted Bundy, Jeffrey Dahmer, John Wayne Gacy, Timothy McVeigh, and Usama bin Laden?) By contrast, at one time the principle that “Everyone is presumed to know the law,” which is more a rule of law than a presumption,2 did represent the actual state of affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Birmingham Botany Collections the Herbarium of James Eustace Bagnall
    Birmingham Museums Birmingham Botany Collections The Herbarium of James Eustace Bagnall Edited by Phil Watson and Emily Gough © Birmingham Museums Version 1.0 October 2014 Birmingham Botany Collections – Herbarium of J E Bagnall 1 Birmingham Botany Collections – Herbarium of J E Bagnall Introduction A brief biography of Bagnall (1830-1918) was given in Birmingham Botany Collections – Mosses (http://www.bmag.org.uk/uploads/fck/file/BBC%20Mosses.pdf ) and there is no need to repeat this here except to reiterate that he was Birmingham’s greatest botanist whose passion was driven by the compilation of his The Flora of Warwickshire (Gurney & Jackson, London and Cornish Brothers, Birmingham, 1891) and, subsequently, The Flora of Staffordshire which was published as a supplement to the Journal of Botany 39 (West, Newman & Co, London 1901). He presented his herbarium in its entirety to Birmingham Museum in 1913. This included 4570 specimens of mosses, 700 liverworts and 180 lichens all of which have already been published in the respective fascicles of Birmingham Botany Collections . The present fascicle covers his collection of vascular plants and contains a little over 6400 specimens. Of these he collected almost 3700 (57%) himself. The remaining 43% (just over 2750 specimens) were collected and passed on to Bagnall by a whole range of different people from across the country. Of these the most prolific was A. Ley who supplied almost 200 items. Only 135 specimens (a mere 2%) have no collector recorded for them and 72 of these are from Warwickshire, Staffordshire or Worcestershire so could well have been collected by Bagnall himself.
    [Show full text]