The Interstate That Almost
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Freddy's Frozen Custard & Steakburgers : Sale Leaseback
Freddy’s Frozen Custard & Steakburgers : Sale Leaseback : 5.65% PRICE: . $2,212,389 RENTABLE SF: . 3,053 SF ANNUAL RENT: . $125,000 LOT SIZE: . .869 ACRES CAP: . 5.65% YEAR BUILT: . 2016 20-YEAR LEASE 1100 Kenilworth Ave Suite 210 Click for Map Charlotte, NC 28204 John Lambert, CCIM [email protected] 704.927.9226 MARKET AERIAL: CONCORD, NC Population 1-Mile 3-Mile 5-Mile 2016 Population 3,781 42,617 121,046 2021 Population 4,195 47,370 134,294 Daytime Employment 5,072 16,951 50,738 2016 Average Household Income $96,353 $97,084 $86,013 2021 Average Household Income $96,353 $97,084 $86,013 2010 Average Home Value $257,729 $223,899 $208,749 LOCATION MAP: CONCORD, NC 3 INCOME AND EXPENSE PRICE $2,212,389 Price Per Square Foot: $724.66 Capitalization Rate: 5.65% Total Rentable Area (SF): 3,053 Lot Size (AC): .869 STABILIZED INCOME Scheduled Rent $125,000 Option Periods 10% increase every 5 years LESS PER SQUARE FOOT Taxes NNN $0.00 Insurance NNN $0.00 Total Operating Expenses NNN $0.00 EQUALS NET OPERATING INCOME $125,000 4 OPERATOR AND GUARANTOR • Tenant: HCI Hospitality is a multi-brand hospitality management company that runs Wildcat Steakburgers, LLC (Guarantor). HCI Hospitality originated in 2002 as a multi- unit owner-operator, and now employs more than 1,600 team members. HCI’s portfolio includes Freddy’s Frozen Custard, owner-operated restaurants, and Woof’s – a regional leader in doggy daycare. Wildcat Steak burgers. LLC (Guarantor) owns and operates 25 Freddy’s Frozen Custard and Steakburgers. -
DRUID HILLS HISTORIC DISTRICT US29 Atlanta Vicinity Fulton County
DRUID HILLS HISTORIC DISTRICT HABS GA-2390 US29 GA-2390 Atlanta vicinity Fulton County Georgia PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA FIELD RECORDS HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 100 Alabama St. NW Atlanta, GA 30303 HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY DRUID HILLS HISTORIC DISTRICT HABS No. GA-2390 Location: Situated between the City of Atlanta, Decatur, and Emory University in the northeast Atlanta metropolitan area, DeKalb County. Present Owner: Multiple ownership. Present Occupant: Multiple occupants. Present Use: Residential, Park and Recreation. Significance: Druid Hills is historically significant primarily in the areas of landscape architecture~ architecture, and conununity planning. Druid Hills is the finest examp1e of late-nineteenth and early-twentieth-century comprehensive suburban planning and development in the Atlanta metropo 1 i tan area, and one of the finest turn-of-the-century suburbs in the southeastern United States. Druid Hills is more specifically noted because: Cl} it is a major work by the eminent landscape architect Frederick Law Olmsted and Ms successors, the Olmsted Brothers, and the only such work in Atlanta; (2) it is a good example of Frederick Law Olmsted 1 s principles and practices regarding suburban development; (3) its overall planning, as conceived by Frederick Law Olmsted and more fully developed by the Olmsted Brothers, is of exceptionally high quality when measured against the prevailing standards for turn-of-the-century suburbs; (4) its landscaping, also designed originally by Frederick Law Olmsted and developed more fully by the Olmsted Brothers, is, like its planning, of exceptionally high quality; (5) its actual development, as carried out oripinally by Joel Hurt's Kirkwood Land Company and later by Asa G. -
Comments on the Draft Supplemental Final Environmental Impact Statement (“DSFEIS”) for the Monroe Connector/Bypass
S OUTHERN E NVIRONMENTAL L AW C ENTER Telephone 919-967-1450 601 WEST ROSEMARY STREET, SUITE 220 Facsimile 919-929-9421 CHAPEL HILL, NC 27516-2356 January 6, 2014 VIA E-MAIL AND FEDEX Jennifer Harris North Carolina Department of Transportation 1 South Wilmington Street Raleigh, NC 27601 [email protected] RE: Monroe Connector/Bypass: Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Dear Ms. Harris: On behalf of the North Carolina Wildlife Federation, Clean Air Carolina and the Yadkin Riverkeeper, the Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) submits the attached comments on the Draft Supplemental Final Environmental Impact Statement (“DSFEIS”) for the Monroe Connector/Bypass. In addition, we submit a report by transportation expert David T. Hartgen, which reviews NCDOT’s traffic forecasts for the project.1 Dr. Hartgen concludes that the forecasts are inadequate to support decisionmaking. The comments below identify severe deficiencies in the DSFEIS which call into question the advisability of proceeding further with the $900 million Bypass. The key shortcomings include the following: New Trends: Much has changed since NCDOT first began to study the Monroe Connector/ Bypass in 2007. But the DSFEIS, which appears to be written only to justify a new highway, disregards any new information suggesting the merits of a different approach. • Travel speeds along the U.S. 74 corridor have improved dramatically in the past five years, increasing by 10-15 mph in that short time span. • Traffic volumes in the corridor have remained flat for the past decade. • The Bypass, which was originally anticipated to save commuters travelling its full length 29-32 minutes, is now estimated to save a mere 8-12 minutes in the opening year. -
Fulton County, Georgia
t P N S W Winn e Lithia o Arts Center Villa Park Suburban Plaza English a Woodrow g Princeton Corretta N r 41 District v Springs t W Park n Emory i Dekalb h i Wilson Park Park ¤£ 75 n d Park r Scott King w N Station Girls Park e e N p R University Medical W ¨¦§ Georgia C High School s Amsterdam S t r Yonah Park r 3 e Center N Mental D e H Huff Rd NW Walk e r o k 29 w l H Health Inst ¤£ A.D. o ly t Gun Club Park Rockdale i W w g h 75 W Williams o W P N g h i Park N 14th St NW E e o Boyd 19 N av d H d W Orme Park l i § t a ¨¦ N n Park d ns R M v J o £ h n ¤ e l Jo ariet Elementary t n C a a S t B R St N re l m d e d W S k ia School e e r e Piedmont Park Inman Middle t N A r e s s Knight Hidden W 75 t u e School v Glenlake Park P h r d ek J Park t e Cove Park Mableton c e r h Mableton n r a ¨¦§ I y C o c d a n c S n Sa c Home N a e 42 w k t M o W o N John Howell E e t P UV M 10th St NE e l s V N r Park 10th St NW W o i e u r a a P E g o C Memorial Park t F d r in w r r t i W A Fire Station n r i N Grady High ia R l v i h l e e Alexander a l e l e e t i N s e t P k t a School E Decatur e e t t 8 #19 C Brown a th S Memorial E v E r a t NW i m k S d N A N w B Cemetery C w t Midtown Druid Towns NW Airport r l Coliseum s t Center v e t r r 139 y d e n a D Midtown Hills Elementary Edwin S D e N N S UV Station Hill r o k H k W r W N South School Place t e Promenade e Golf Course e m e W e e Park o r L p d N r Cobb Park ld W Park Georgia Institute i C N W Springdale Park na e n Midtown 6 Dogwood W Harriett G. -
NORTH Highland AVENUE
NORTH hIGhLAND AVENUE study December, 1999 North Highland Avenue Transportation and Parking Study Prepared by the City of Atlanta Department of Planning, Development and Neighborhood Conservation Bureau of Planning In conjunction with the North Highland Avenue Transportation and Parking Task Force December 1999 North Highland Avenue Transportation and Parking Task Force Members Mike Brown Morningside-Lenox Park Civic Association Warren Bruno Virginia Highlands Business Association Winnie Curry Virginia Highlands Civic Association Peter Hand Virginia Highlands Business Association Stuart Meddin Virginia Highlands Business Association Ruthie Penn-David Virginia Highlands Civic Association Martha Porter-Hall Morningside-Lenox Park Civic Association Jeff Raider Virginia Highlands Civic Association Scott Riley Virginia Highlands Business Association Bill Russell Virginia Highlands Civic Association Amy Waterman Virginia Highlands Civic Association Cathy Woolard City Council – District 6 Julia Emmons City Council Post 2 – At Large CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VISION STATEMENT Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION 1:1 Purpose 1:1 Action 1:1 Location 1:3 History 1:3 The Future 1:5 Chapter 2 TRANSPORTATION OPPORTUNITIES AND ISSUES 2:1 Introduction 2:1 Motorized Traffic 2:2 Public Transportation 2:6 Bicycles 2:10 Chapter 3 PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT OPPORTUNITIES AND ISSUES 3:1 Sidewalks and Crosswalks 3:1 Public Areas and Gateways 3:5 Chapter 4 PARKING OPPORTUNITIES AND ISSUES 4:1 On Street Parking 4:1 Off Street Parking 4:4 Chapter 5 VIRGINIA AVENUE OPPORTUNITIES -
5/31/79; Container 119 to Se
5/31/79 Folder Citation: Collection: Office of Staff Secretary; Series: Presidential Files; Folder: 5/31/79; Container 119 To See Complete Finding Aid: http://www.jimmycarterlibrary.gov/library/findingaids/Staff_Secretary.pdf . ' ' ..,;'� ". •' " / :.. � ...� .. �,''.,o, ·.'t;: rJ ,, . �}·:L�·�,....... , "J"" ,I ·'· '':.. .,,, � (.<"<;;,:. •. ,P ' ,, l ' 'j 'i ,,,, ,. .,,· " ,·, ·'· '. "'{ J, ·� ' �. ' � u � ' � ,.,. �.-.�·�"I' u" •. "'• .. � o' •• .:;,·,,tl., , ,,. ·� .. .. .;,!1. �· ' �> �·: '»c '' • FILE·LOCA:PION ,• ,.. �·'carter .Presidential ·�. ·1Js't3ifi9 ·oox 134 · ' ,..,., "4' .: • <>., ·; 0 '0".¥ -f;/,'(3o-/J.'''J') ._;;���� - 1- nNe SPRING t·1EET•I.NG 5/25/79 :r ' IJ . AUM/�d / - / },-. (�/J 114-;,yPAA.#.�� ��e;� - � -f'u ,/DnV � fr'/)bd-- �//� �PI'S' BEFORE I TAKE YOUR QUESTIONS) WANT TO SP'EAK TO YOU VERY BRIEFLY " __;..__ -- I ABOUT THE RESPONSIBILITIES WE SHARE AS LEADERS OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY, WE WON A GREAT VICTORY TOGETHER IN BUT THE WORDS WHICH ADLAI � 1976, . -- - - ';; STEVENSON ONCE SPOKE TO OUR CONVENTION STILL SPEAK TO US TODAY, HE SAID: -. , "EVEN MORE IMP6RTANT THAN WINNING AN ELECTION IS GOVERNING THE NATION, - . WHEN THE TUMULT AND THE SHOUTING DIE,,,,,THERE IS THE STARK REALITY OF 'i � - - -- � . RESONSIBILITY IN AN �R OF HISTORY," • ' ' ./1/tJ t_,... tvrO#t.f At.lotf!IP�f"KMe�r$'� f !#tl · ,P,€�e.vr ,t rWW�� 1 , . THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR GOVERNING BELONGS TO us DEt�OCRATSJ I I .AND THE !: ::· . AMERICAN · PEOPLE ARE LOOKING TO SEE HOW WE DISCHARGE IT. SOME OF THAT . -- :�, RESPONSIBILITY IS PLEASANT AND ENJOYABLE, BUT SOME OF IT IS VERY DIFFICULT.' - -- � --·IN TIMES LIKE· THESE. I Ill· (=ovER=)� .·.· .. -.·· . :·. .· ' ·.;;.·�:·-) ,'') ·:.; -�- . -. :':��-·· ; I ;; ; - . .;{; ' , · · · � tat ·.. ' __ :· �O$ !Cc®Y�Wi�e ': ' �e 8c · · .. ,� .• · . � . · . : · . � on .· .. ··. ; ; . 0 _ f · . · _ .. · - · ::.-. -' . ... :_::. ··· . :. : · .-: .�.i:t'/ . I : . -
First and Second Generations of Urban Black Mayors: Atlanta, Detroit, and St
Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 12-2001 First and Second Generations of Urban Black Mayors: Atlanta, Detroit, and St. Louis Harold Eugene Core Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Core, Harold Eugene, "First and Second Generations of Urban Black Mayors: Atlanta, Detroit, and St. Louis" (2001). Master's Theses. 3883. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/3883 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FIRST AND SECOND GENERATIONS OF URBAN BLACK MAYORS: ATLANTA, DETROIT, AND ST. LOUIS by Harold Eugene Core, Jr A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College In partial fulfillmentof the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of Political Science Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan December 2001 © 2001 Harold Eugene Core, Jr ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to first acknowledge the courage and leadership of those very first urban black mayors. Without their bravery, hard work, and accomplishments this research, and possibly even this researcher would not exist. In many ways they served as the flagship for the validity of black political empowerment as they struggled to balance their roles as leaders of large cities and spokespersons for the African American cause. Secondly I would like to thank the members of my thesis committee, specifically Dr. -
August 2005 Stone Mountain Park Master Plan
MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT REPORT August 15, 2005 GEORGIA’S STONE MOUNTAIN PARK MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT REPORT August 15, 2005 GEORGIA’S STONE MOUNTAIN PARK Robert and Company Engineers Architects Planners 96 Poplar Street, N.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30303 GEORGIA’S STONE MOUNTAIN PARK MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE INTRODUCTION i 1. HISTORY OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT IN STONE MOUNTAIN PARK 1-1 2. KEY ELEMENTS OF THE 1992 MASTER PLAN 2-1 3. PRIVATIZATION AND THE LONG RANGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 3-1 4. MASTER PLAN REFINEMENTS A. Park Center District 4-1 B. Natural District 4-3 C. Recreation District 4-4 D. Events District 4-4 5. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 5-1 6. MANAGEMENT OF NATURAL AND HISTORICAL RESOURCES A. Summary Management Statement 6-1 B. Summary Management Recommendations 6-1 C. Vegetation Management Recommendations 6-2 D. Vegetation Inventory: Summary Field Survey 6-6 E. Natural District 6-9 7. LONG RANGE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 7-1 GRAPHICS PAGE EXISTING LAND USE MAP ii PARK DISTRICT MAP 2-2 LONG RANGE PLAN 4-2 TRAFFIC CIRCULATION AND PARKING IMPROVEMENTS 5-3 NATURAL RESOURCES MAP 6-3 INTRODUCTION Georgia’s Stone Mountain Park is located 16 miles east of downtown Atlanta. The Park is comprised of approximately 3,200 acres of woodlands and features as its centerpiece, Stone Mountain, one of the world’s largest exposed granite monoliths. Within the Park’s boundaries there are also several lakes that cover a total of approximately 362 acres – Stone Mountain Lake is the largest at 323 acres. Often considered to be the State’s greatest natural tourist attraction, several million people visit Stone Mountain Park every year, making it one of the highest attendance attractions in the United States. -
Rfq) and Proposals
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) AND PROPOSALS ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES FOR FORTY OAKS NATURE PRESERVE FARM HOUSE 3790 MARKET STREET Issue Date: July 6th, 2021 Submission Deadline: August 11th, 2021; 3:00 P.M. SECTION 1. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Introduction and Background The City of Clarkston, Georgia (‘City”) is soliciting Statements of Qualifications and Proposals from architectural design firms with a strong record in historical preservation architecture and adaptive reuse of historic structures for modern uses. The City intends to contract for Architectural and Professional Design Services for the historic renovation and rehabilitation of a city-owned farmhouse located within the Forty Oaks Nature Preserve; 3790 Market Street. Phase I of this project is for Architectural Design Teams with relevant experience and qualifications to submit a Statement of Qualifications from the lead architectural firm and all associated sub-consultants. The City’s Evaluation Committee; consisting of the City Historic Preservation Commission, City Manager and City Engineer, will identify and recommend to City Council and Mayor a list of short-listed teams (s). This RFQ proposal is for PH I services only. Funding for Phase I will come exclusively from the City of Clarkston. Phase II will involve City Council and Mayor approving a final list of short-listed firms. These short-listed firms will receive requirements for submission of technical and fee proposals. Submission requirements will be issued only to the short-listed firm (s). The City Evaluation Team will assess the short-listed firm proposals followed by negotiations of scope, fee and contract terms with most qualified Architectural Design Team. -
2014 OAH Annual Meeting Program
INTRODUCING The American Historian A NEW OAH MAGAZINE The OAH is pleased to announce a The American Historian new magazine for all of our members. OrgA NIZATI O N O F AMEricA N HISTORIA NS The American Historian will cover the broad variety of needs and interests of our members, including primary and secondary teaching, professional development, research, recent schol- arship, public history, digital history, and contemporary debates about the past. We believe that it will educate and excite OAH members and the entire Race, Rights, and Relocation ALSO INSIDE U.S. history community. The Forgotten Debate of ‘76 p. 24 Labor, Gender, and Unrest in the Gilded Age p. 28 PLUS News, Reviews, and More We will be distributing a prototype issue of the magazine at our 2014 Annual Meeting in Atlanta. We hope you will pick up a copy. The American Historian will officially debut in the summer of 2014. Finally, we welcome your submis- sions. For information, please contact The American Historian’s acting editor, William Gillis, at [email protected]. APRIL 10 – 13 | HILTON ATLANTA • 1 We l c o m e Welcome to the 105th Annual Meeting of the Organization of American Historians! Meeting themes are rarely “ripped from the headlines” as if they were scripts from television’s Law and Order. However, the heated national debate over comprehensive immigration reform calls attention to American history’s perennial themes: the peopling of the United States and the great vitality derived from the diversity of the American population. “Crossing Borders,” then, seemed the appropriate choice to be the thematic focus of this year’s meeting. -
City of Atlanta 2016-2020 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) Community Work Program (CWP)
City of Atlanta 2016-2020 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) Community Work Program (CWP) Prepared By: Department of Planning and Community Development 55 Trinity Avenue Atlanta, Georgia 30303 www.atlantaga.gov DRAFT JUNE 2015 Page is left blank intentionally for document formatting City of Atlanta 2016‐2020 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) and Community Work Program (CWP) June 2015 City of Atlanta Department of Planning and Community Development Office of Planning 55 Trinity Avenue Suite 3350 Atlanta, GA 30303 http://www.atlantaga.gov/indeex.aspx?page=391 Online City Projects Database: http:gis.atlantaga.gov/apps/cityprojects/ Mayor The Honorable M. Kasim Reed City Council Ceasar C. Mitchell, Council President Carla Smith Kwanza Hall Ivory Lee Young, Jr. Council District 1 Council District 2 Council District 3 Cleta Winslow Natalyn Mosby Archibong Alex Wan Council District 4 Council District 5 Council District 6 Howard Shook Yolanda Adreaan Felicia A. Moore Council District 7 Council District 8 Council District 9 C.T. Martin Keisha Bottoms Joyce Sheperd Council District 10 Council District 11 Council District 12 Michael Julian Bond Mary Norwood Andre Dickens Post 1 At Large Post 2 At Large Post 3 At Large Department of Planning and Community Development Terri M. Lee, Deputy Commissioner Charletta Wilson Jacks, Director, Office of Planning Project Staff Jessica Lavandier, Assistant Director, Strategic Planning Rodney Milton, Principal Planner Lenise Lyons, Urban Planner Capital Improvements Program Sub‐Cabinet Members Atlanta BeltLine, -
Chapter 1 Overview
Chapter 1 Overview Plan Purpose. In the state of Georgia, municipal governments must retain their Qualified Local Government Status in order to be eligible for a variety of state funded programs. To maintain this status, communities must meet minimum planning standards developed by the Georgia Department of Community Affairs (DCA). Gwinnett County exceeds the minimum standards through its Unified Plan, which is called a comprehensive plan in other jurisdictions. The 2030 Unified Plan was adopted in February 2009. This 2040 Unified Plan was prepared to continue a long term vision for Gwinnett County and identify short term, incremental steps that can be used to achieve this vision. As such, this plan envisions Gwinnett County in the year 2040 and asks three fundamental questions: 1. Where do we want to go? 2. How do we get there? 3. How will we unify the policies of land use, infrastructure (such as transportation and sewer), parks and open spaces, economic development, and housing to ensure that Gwinnett remains a “preferred place” to live and work? 4 Gwinnett 2040 Unified Plan How to Use this Document. 1. Overview This Unified Plan is intended to serve many different functions for various agencies and groups within and outside of Gwinnett County. For instance, it is intended to communicate how Gwinnett County meets the minimum planning standards to DCA and also serve as a guide for Gwinnett County staff in day-to-day decision making. Given all the different interests and requirements related to this document, there are many different ways to use this document. The document is divided into chapters, described below.