DOCSLIB.ORG

What Does It Mean to Be an American? 31 Others Jennifer Ratner-Rosenhagen Anti-Intellectualism As Romantic Discourse 41 Ajay K

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
What Does It Mean to Be an American? 31 Others Jennifer Ratner-Rosenhagen Anti-Intellectualism As Romantic Discourse 41 Ajay K coming up in Dædalus: Dædalus on being human Ian Hacking, K. Anthony Appiah, Harriet Ritvo, Robert B. Pippin, Dædalus Michael S. Gazzaniga, Steven Rose & Hilary Rose, Geoffrey Galt Harpham, and others Journal of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences the global Steven Miller & Scott Sagan, Richard Lester & Robert Rosner, Paul Spring 2009 nuclear future Joskow & John E. Parsons, Harold Feiveson, John Rowe, Matthew Bunn, George Perkovich, Richard Meserve, Thomas Isaacs & Charles McCombie, William Potter, Atsuyuki Suzuki, Paul Doty, Thomas Spring 2009: emerging voices Schelling, Anne Lauvergeon, Lawrence Scheinman & Marvin Miller, emerging Foreword 5 Sam Nunn, José Goldemberg, Sverre Lodgaard, Siegfried Hecker, voices Mohamed Shaker, Jayantha Dhanapala, Abbas Maleki, and others David Greenberg The presidential debates as political ritual 6 Hsuan L. Hsu the future of news Loren Ghiglione, Jill Abramson, Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Jack Fuller, & Martha Lincoln Health media & global inequalities 20 Donald Kennedy, Brant Houston, Robert Giles, Michael Schudson, Adrian Holovaty, Susan King, Herbert J. Gans, Jane B. Singer, and Sarah Song What does it mean to be an American? 31 others Jennifer Ratner-Rosenhagen Anti-intellectualism as romantic discourse 41 Ajay K. Mehrotra The intellectual foundations of the modern American ½scal state 53 John Jacob Kaag Pragmatism & the lessons of experience 63 Christopher Klemek The rise & fall of New Left urbanism 73 Jason Puskar Risking Ralph Ellison 83 Chip Colwell-Chanthaphonh Reconciling American archaeology & Native America 94 Sharon K. Weiner Competing organizational interests & Soviet wmd expertise 105 Paul K. MacDonald Rebalancing American foreign policy 115 Crystal N. Feimster The threat of sexual violence during the American Civil War 126 poetry Arda Collins From Speaking In The Fall 135 Matthew Dickman Divinity 136 Dawn Lundy Martin excerpts from Discipline 138 Meghan O’Rourke Ophelia To The Court 140 Matthew Zapruder The New Lustration 141 Cherishing Knowledge, Shaping the Future U.S. $13; www.amacad.org Building for the Twenty-First Century Sarah Song What does it mean to be an American? It is often said that being an American sions has undercut the universalist means sharing a commitment to a set stance; for being an American has also of values and ideals.1 Writing about the meant sharing a national culture, one relationship of ethnicity and American largely de½ned in racial, ethnic, and identity, the historian Philip Gleason put religious terms. And while solidarity it this way: can be understood as “an experience of willed af½liation,” some forms of To be or to become an American, a person American solidarity have been less in- did not have to be any particular national, clusive than others, demanding much linguistic, religious, or ethnic background. more than simply the desire to af½liate.3 All he had to do was to commit himself to In this essay, I explore different ideals the political ideology centered on the ab- of civic solidarity with an eye toward stract ideals of liberty, equality, and repub- what they imply for newcomers who licanism. Thus the universalist ideological wish to become American citizens. character of American nationality meant Why does civic solidarity matter? that it was open to anyone who willed to First, it is integral to the pursuit of become an American.2 distributive justice. The institutions To take the motto of the Great Seal of the welfare state serve as redistrib- of the United States, E pluribus unum– utive mechanisms that can offset the “From many, one”–in this context sug- inequalities of life chances that a capi- gests not that manyness should be melt- talist economy creates, and they raise ed down into one, as in Israel Zangwill’s the position of the worst-off members image of the melting pot, but that, as of society to a level where they are able the Great Seal’s sheaf of arrows suggests, to participate as equal citizens. While there should be a coexistence of many- self-interest alone may motivate people in-one under a uni½ed citizenship based to support social insurance schemes that on shared ideals. protect them against unpredictable cir- Of course, the story is not so simple, as cumstances, solidarity is understood to Gleason himself went on to note. Amer- be required to support redistribution ica’s history of racial and ethnic exclu- from the rich to aid the poor, including housing subsidies, income supplements, © 2009 by the American Academy of Arts and long-term unemployment bene½ts.4 & Sciences The underlying idea is that people are Dædalus Spring 2009 31 Sarah more likely to support redistributive political life.6 The challenge, then, is to Song schemes when they trust one another, develop a model of civic solidarity that is and they are more likely to trust one “thick” enough to motivate support for another when they regard others as like justice and democracy while also “thin” themselves in some meaningful sense. enough to accommodate racial, ethnic, Second, genuine democracy demands and religious diversity. solidarity. If democratic activity in- volves not just voting, but also deliber- We might look ½rst to Habermas’s ation, then people must make an effort idea of constitutional patriotism (Ver- to listen to and understand one another. fassungspatriotismus). The idea emerged Moreover, they must be willing to mod- from a particular national history, to de- erate their claims in the hope of ½nding note attachment to the liberal democrat- common ground on which to base politi- ic institutions of the postwar Federal Re- cal decisions. Such democratic activity public of Germany, but Habermas and cannot be realized by individuals pursu- others have taken it to be a generalizable ing their own interests; it requires some vision for liberal democratic societies, concern for the common good. A sense as well as for supranational communi- of solidarity can help foster mutual sym- ties such as the European Union. On pathy and respect, which in turn support this view, what binds citizens together citizens’ orientation toward the com- is their common allegiance to the ideals mon good. embodied in a shared political culture. Third, civic solidarity offers more in- The only “common denominator for a clusive alternatives to chauvinist models constitutional patriotism” is that “every that often prevail in political life around citizen be socialized into a common po- the world. For example, the alternative litical culture.”7 to the Nehru-Gandhi secular de½nition Habermas points to the United States of Indian national identity is the Hindu as a leading example of a multicultural chauvinism of the Bharatiya Janata Par- society where constitutional principles ty, not a cosmopolitan model of belong- have taken root in a political culture ing. “And what in the end can defeat without depending on “all citizens’ shar- this chauvinism,” asks Charles Taylor, ing the same language or the same eth- “but some reinvention of India as a secu- nic and cultural origins.”8 The basis of lar republic with which people can iden- American solidarity is not any particular tify?”5 It is not enough to articulate ac- racial or ethnic identity or religious be- counts of solidarity and belonging only liefs, but universal moral ideals embod- at the subnational or transnational levels ied in American political culture and set while ignoring senses of belonging to the forth in such seminal texts as the Decla- political community. One might believe ration of Independence, the U.S. Con- that people have a deep need for belong- stitution and Bill of Rights, Abraham ing in communities, perhaps grounded Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address, and Mar- in even deeper human needs for recog- tin Luther King, Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” nition and freedom, but even those skep- speech. Based on a minimal commonal- tical of such claims might recognize the ity of shared ideals, constitutional patri- importance of articulating more inclu- otism is attractive for the agnosticism sive models of political community as toward particular moral and religious an alternative to the racial, ethnic, or re- outlooks and ethnocultural identities ligious narratives that have permeated to which it aspires. 32 Dædalus Spring 2009 What does constitutional patriotism not that they necessarily embrace the What does suggest for the sort of reception immi- majority’s ethical-cultural forms. it mean to be an grants should receive? There has been Yet language is a key aspect of “ethi- American? a general shift in Western Europe and cal-cultural” forms of life, shaping peo- North America in the standards govern- ple’s worldviews and experiences. It is ing access to citizenship from cultural through language that individuals be- markers to values, and this is a develop- come who they are. Since a political ment that constitutional patriots would community must conduct its affairs in applaud. In the United States those seek- at least one language, the ethical-cultur- ing to become citizens must demon- al and political cannot be completely strate basic knowledge of U.S. govern- “uncoupled.” As theorists of multicul- ment and history. A newly revised U.S. turalism have stressed, complete sepa- citizenship test was instituted in Octo- ration of state and particularistic iden- ber 2008 with the hope that it will serve, tities is impossible; government deci- in the words of the chief of the Of½ce sions about the language of public insti- of Citizenship, Alfonso Aguilar, as “an tutions, public holidays, and state sym- instrument to promote civic learning bols unavoidably involve recognizing and patriotism.”9 The revised test at- and supporting particular ethnic and re- tempts to move away from civics trivia ligious groups over others.12 In the Unit- to emphasize political ideas and con- ed States, English language ability has cepts. (There is still a fair amount of been a statutory quali½cation for natu- trivia: “How many amendments does ralization since 1906, originally as a re- the Constitution have?” “What is the quirement of oral ability and later as a capital of your state?”) The new test requirement of English literacy.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • To Get the File
    This page intentionally left blank Justice, Gender, and the Politics of Multiculturalism Justice, Gender, and the Politics of Multiculturalism explores the tensions that arise when culturally diverse democratic states pursue both justice for religious and cultural minorities and justice for women. Sarah Song provides a distinctive argument about the circumstances under which egalitarian justice requires special accommodations for cultural minor- ities while emphasizing the value of gender equality as an important limit on cultural accommodation. Drawing on detailed case studies of gen- dered cultural conflicts, including conflicts over the ‘‘cultural defense’’ in criminal law, aboriginal membership rules, and polygamy, Song offers a fresh perspective on multicultural politics by examining the role of intercultural interactions in shaping such conflicts. In particular, she demonstrates the different ways that majority institutions have rein- forced gender inequality in minority communities and, in light of this, argues in favor of resolving gendered cultural dilemmas through inter- cultural democratic dialogue. SARAH SONG is Assistant Professor of Law and Political Science at the University of California, Berkeley. Contemporary Political Theory Series Editor Ian Shapiro Editorial Board Russell Hardin Stephen Holmes Jeffrey Isaac John Keane Elizabeth Kiss Susan Okin Phillipe Van Parijs Philip Pettit As the twenty-first century begins, major new political challenges have arisen at the same time as some of the most enduring dilemmas of political association remain unresolved. The collapse of communism and the end of the Cold War reflect a victory for democratic and liberal values, yet in many of the Western countries that nurtured those values there are severe problems of urban decay, class and racial conflict, and failing political legitimacy.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Anxieties of Membership: American Citizenship after Democratic Nationalism Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2926n3vr Author Pippenger, Nathan Publication Date 2019 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Anxieties of Membership: American Citizenship after Democratic Nationalism By Nathan Pippenger A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Mark Bevir, Co-chair Professor Sarah Song, Co-chair Professor Shannon Stimson Professor Christopher Kutz Spring 2019 Anxieties of Membership: American Citizenship after Democratic Nationalism © 2019 by Nathan Pippenger 1 Abstract Anxieties of Membership: American Citizenship after Democratic Nationalism by Nathan Pippenger Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Berkeley Professor Mark Bevir, Co-chair Professor Sarah Song, Co-chair This dissertation argues that the democratic goal of collective sovereignty requires a particularistic, imagined sense of association among members of the demos, and that American egalitarians’ rejection of that idea has profoundly shaped the trajectory of American citizenship since the late 1960s. It develops an analytical framework of “holistic democratic citizenship,” which treats citizenship in contemporary democracies
    [Show full text]
  • Sarah Song What Does It Mean to Be an American?
    Sarah Song What does it mean to be an American? It is often said that being an American sions has undercut the universalist means sharing a commitment to a set stance; for being an American has also of values and ideals.1 Writing about the meant sharing a national culture, one relationship of ethnicity and American largely de½ned in racial, ethnic, and identity, the historian Philip Gleason put religious terms. And while solidarity it this way: can be understood as “an experience of willed af½liation,” some forms of To be or to become an American, a person American solidarity have been less in- did not have to be any particular national, clusive than others, demanding much linguistic, religious, or ethnic background. more than simply the desire to af½liate.3 All he had to do was to commit himself to In this essay, I explore different ideals the political ideology centered on the ab- of civic solidarity with an eye toward stract ideals of liberty, equality, and repub- what they imply for newcomers who licanism. Thus the universalist ideological wish to become American citizens. character of American nationality meant Why does civic solidarity matter? that it was open to anyone who willed to First, it is integral to the pursuit of become an American.2 distributive justice. The institutions To take the motto of the Great Seal of the welfare state serve as redistrib- of the United States, E pluribus unum– utive mechanisms that can offset the “From many, one”–in this context sug- inequalities of life chances that a capi- gests not that manyness should be melt- talist economy creates, and they raise ed down into one, as in Israel Zangwill’s the position of the worst-off members image of the melting pot, but that, as of society to a level where they are able the Great Seal’s sheaf of arrows suggests, to participate as equal citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 1 • 2016 • No. 1
    VOL. 1 • 2016 • NO. 1 Cambridge Journals Online For further information about this journal please go to the journal website at: journals.cambridge.org/rep Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.19, on 29 Sep 2021 at 19:01:04, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2014.1 220566085_1-1.indd0566085_1-1.indd 11-3-3 228/03/168/03/16 33:42:42 PPMM JOURNAL OF RACE, ETHNICITY AND POLITICS EDITOR S. Karthick Ramakrishnan, University of California, Riverside, USA Email: [email protected] ASSOCIATE EDITORS Michael Javen Fortner, City University of New Sheryl Lightfoot, University of British York, USA Columbia, Canada Michael Jones-Correa, Cornell University, Dara Z. Strolovitch, Princeton University, USA USA BOOK REVIEW EDITOR Tony Affi gne, Providence College, USA Email: [email protected] EDITORIAL BOARD Cristina Beltran, New York University, USA Desmond King, Oxford University, UK Cathy Cohen, University of Chicago, USA Eric McDaniel, University of Texas, Austin, Jeff Corntassel, University of Victoria, Canada USA Rodolfo Espino, Arizona State University, USA Juliet Pietsch, Australia National University, Cybelle Fox, University of California, Australia Berkeley, USA Patrick Simon, University of Paris, France Claudine Gay, Harvard University, USA Rogers Smith, University of Pennsylvania, Terri Givens, University of Texas, Austin, USA USA Virginie Guiraudon, University of Paris, Sarah Song, University of California, Berkeley,
    [Show full text]
  • SARAH SONG Professor of Law and Political Science Jurisprudence & Social Policy (JSP) Program U.C
    SARAH SONG Professor of Law and Political Science Jurisprudence & Social Policy (JSP) Program U.C. Berkeley Law School 422 North Addition Berkeley, CA 94720-7200 [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D. (with distinction), Political Science, Yale University, 2003 Dissertation: Culture, Gender, and Equality Committee: Rogers Smith (chair), Ian Shapiro, Jennifer Pitts M.Phil, Politics, Oxford University, 1998 Thesis: Religious Liberty and State Neutrality: Accommodating the Free Exercise of Religion Advisor: David Miller B.A., Social Studies (magna cum laude), Harvard University, 1996 ACADEMIC POSITIONS Professor of Law and Political Science, U.C. Berkeley, 2010- Affiliated Faculty, Philosophy, U.C. Berkeley, 2015- Affiliated Faculty, Women, Gender, & Sexuality Studies, U.C. Berkeley, 2013- Assistant Professor of Law and Political Science, U.C. Berkeley, 2007-10 Assistant Professor of Political Science and Affiliated Faculty in Philosophy and Women’s & Gender Studies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2003-07 AWARDS AND FELLOWSHIPS Law & Humanities Strategic Working Group, Townsend Center for the Humanities, Spring 2014 Fellow, National Forum on the Future of Liberal Education, Teagle Foundation, 2010-12 Ralph Bunche Award for “the best scholarly work in political science which explores the phenomenon of ethnic & cultural pluralism,” American Political Science Association, 2008 U.C. Berkeley Regents’ Junior Faculty Fellowship, 2008 Visiting Scholars Program Fellowship, American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2005-06 Best Dissertation
    [Show full text]
  • Sarah Song U.C
    SARAH SONG U.C. Berkeley School of Law and Department of Political Science 422 North Addition, Berkeley, CA 94720-7200 (510) 643-5637; [email protected] EDUCATION Yale University, Ph.D. (with distinction), Political Science, 2003 Dissertation: Culture, Gender, and Equality Committee: Rogers M. Smith (chair), Ian Shapiro, Jennifer Pitts Oxford University, M.Phil, Politics, 1998 Thesis: Religious Liberty and State Neutrality: Accommodating the Free Exercise of Religion Supervisor: David Miller Harvard University, B.A. (magna cum laude), Social Studies, 1996 ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS Professor of Law and Associate Professor of Political Science, U.C. Berkeley, 2010- Assistant Professor of Law and Political Science, U.C. Berkeley, 2007-10 Assistant Professor of Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2003-07 (Affiliated Faculty in Philosophy and Women’s Studies) AWARDS, FELLOWSHIPS, AND GRANTS Fellow, National Forum on the Future of Liberal Education, Teagle Foundation, 2010-12 Ralph Bunche Award, given annually by the American Political Science Association (APSA) for “the best scholarly work in political science which explores the phenomenon of ethnic and cultural pluralism,” 2008 U.C. Berkeley Regents’ Junior Faculty Fellowship, 2008 U.C. Berkeley Committee on Research Junior Faculty Research Grant, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 Visiting Scholars Program, American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2005-06 Best Dissertation Award, given by the APSA Women and Politics Section, 2004 Charlotte W. Newcombe Doctoral Dissertation Fellowship,
    [Show full text]
  • American Citizenship After Democratic Nationalism by Nathan Pippenger
    Anxieties of Membership: American Citizenship after Democratic Nationalism By Nathan Pippenger A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Mark Bevir, Co-chair Professor Sarah Song, Co-chair Professor Shannon Stimson Professor Christopher Kutz Spring 2019 Anxieties of Membership: American Citizenship after Democratic Nationalism © 2019 by Nathan Pippenger 1 Abstract Anxieties of Membership: American Citizenship after Democratic Nationalism by Nathan Pippenger Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Berkeley Professor Mark Bevir, Co-chair Professor Sarah Song, Co-chair This dissertation argues that the democratic goal of collective sovereignty requires a particularistic, imagined sense of association among members of the demos, and that American egalitarians’ rejection of that idea has profoundly shaped the trajectory of American citizenship since the late 1960s. It develops an analytical framework of “holistic democratic citizenship,” which treats citizenship in contemporary democracies as a composite status of five historically- accreted elements (political participation, rights, equality, intersubjective identification, and perpetuation), and reconstructs an American intellectual tradition of “democratic nationalism,” which prominently attempted to promote holistic citizenship through a nationally-scaled narrative of peoplehood
    [Show full text]
  • SARAH SONG Professor of Law, Political Science, and Philosophy Jurisprudence & Social Policy (JSP) Program U.C
    SARAH SONG Professor of Law, Political Science, and Philosophy Jurisprudence & Social Policy (JSP) Program U.C. Berkeley Law School 422 North Addition, Berkeley, CA 94720-7200 [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D. (with distinction), Political Science, Yale University, 2003 Dissertation: Culture, Gender, and Equality Committee: Rogers Smith (chair), Ian Shapiro, Jennifer Pitts M.Phil, Politics, Oxford University, 1998 Thesis: Religious Liberty and State Neutrality: Accommodating the Free Exercise of Religion Advisor: David Miller B.A., Social Studies (magna cum laude), Harvard University, 1996 ACADEMIC POSITIONS Professor of Law and Political Science, U.C. Berkeley, 2010- Affiliated Faculty, Philosophy, U.C. Berkeley, 2015- Affiliated Faculty, Women, Gender, & Sexuality Studies, U.C. Berkeley, 2013- Assistant Professor of Law and Political Science, U.C. Berkeley, 2007-10 Assistant Professor of Political Science and Affiliated Faculty in Philosophy and Women’s & Gender Studies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2003-07 AWARDS AND FELLOWSHIPS Law & Humanities Strategic Working Group, Townsend Center for the Humanities, Spring 2014 Fellow, National Forum on the Future of Liberal Education, Teagle Foundation, 2010-12 Ralph Bunche Award for the best scholarly work in political science which explores the phenomenon of ethnic & cultural pluralism, American Political Science Association, 2008 U.C. Berkeley Regents’ Junior Faculty Fellowship, 2008 Visiting Scholars Program Fellowship, American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2005-06 Best Dissertation
    [Show full text]