DOCSLIB.ORG

Ocean Wind Offshore Wind Farm Project Site Assessment Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ocean Wind Offshore Wind Farm Project Site Assessment Plan Ocean Wind LLC Ocean Wind Offshore Wind Farm Project Site Assessment Plan Submitted to the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management September 15, Revised November 9, 2017, January 10, 2018, and February 23, 2018 Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. Prepared Scott Lundin, Janelle Lavallee (Tetra Tech ltd) 09 January 2018 Checked Marcus Cross, Charles R Scott (Orsted) 09 January 2018 Accepted Marcus Cross 10 January 2018 / 23 Feb 2018 Approved Pernille Hermansen (Orsted) 10 January 2018 / 23 Feb 2018 Doc. no. 2916398 Ver. no. 2864961C Case no. 200-16-2791 This page intentionally left blank Doc. No. 2916398 Ocean Wind Offshore Wind Farm Site Assessment Plan (Ver. No. 2864961C) Table of Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Authorized Representative and Designated Operator ............................................................. 1 1.2 Certified Verification Agent Waiver Request............................................................................ 6 1.3 Best Management Practices .................................................................................................... 6 2. Conformity with Prior BOEM Actions Regarding SAP Activities ......................................................... 7 2.1 Mid-Atlantic Environmental Assessment ................................................................................. 7 2.2 Lease OCS-A 0498 .................................................................................................................. 8 3. Project Description and Objectives ................................................................................................... 10 3.1 Project Description and Objectives ........................................................................................ 10 3.2 Site Location .......................................................................................................................... 12 3.3 Mooring Designs, Power Equipment and Instrumentation .................................................... 14 3.3.1 WindSentinel™ ........................................................................................................... 14 3.3.2 TRIAXYS Buoy ........................................................................................................... 17 4. Deployment/Installation ..................................................................................................................... 19 4.1 Overview of Installation and Deployment Activities ............................................................... 19 4.1.1 WindSentinel™ and TRIAXYS Buoy Deployment ...................................................... 19 4.2 Vessels................................................................................................................................... 20 4.3 Pre-Installation Briefing .......................................................................................................... 21 4.4 Protected Species Avoidance ................................................................................................ 21 4.4.1 Reporting of Injured or Dead Protected Species ........................................................ 22 4.5 Avian and Bat Protection ....................................................................................................... 23 4.6 Marine Trash and Debris Awareness and Elimination ........................................................... 23 4.7 Oil Spill Response .................................................................................................................. 23 4.8 Health and Safety .................................................................................................................. 24 5. Operations and Maintenance ............................................................................................................ 24 5.1 Data Collection and Operations for Wind and Metocean Data .............................................. 24 5.2 Maintenance Activities ........................................................................................................... 24 5.2.1 WindSentinel™ ........................................................................................................... 24 5.2.2 TRIAXYS Buoy ........................................................................................................... 24 5.3 Reporting................................................................................................................................ 25 5.4 Potential Faults or Failures .................................................................................................... 25 5.5 Overview of Decommissioning Activities ............................................................................... 26 i Doc. No. 2916398 Ocean Wind Offshore Wind Farm Site Assessment Plan (Ver. No. 2864961C) 5.6 Site Clearance ....................................................................................................................... 26 5.7 Reporting................................................................................................................................ 26 6. Affected Environment, Potential Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ................................................ 26 6.1 Geological Conditions ............................................................................................................ 27 6.1.1 Western Buoy Deployment Area ................................................................................ 27 6.1.2 Eastern Buoy Deployment Area ................................................................................. 28 6.1.3 Natural Seafloor and Sub-Seafloor Hazards .............................................................. 30 6.2 Archaeological Resources ..................................................................................................... 32 6.2.1 Affected Environment ................................................................................................. 32 6.2.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation Measures ............................................... 33 6.3 Benthic Resources ................................................................................................................. 33 6.3.1 Western Buoy Deployment Area ................................................................................ 33 6.3.2 Eastern Buoy Deployment Area ................................................................................. 34 6.4 Fisheries................................................................................................................................. 34 6.5 Marine Mammals and Sea Turtles ......................................................................................... 35 6.6 Avian and Bat Resources ...................................................................................................... 35 6.7 Water Quality ......................................................................................................................... 36 6.8 Air Quality............................................................................................................................... 36 6.8.1 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation Measures ............................................... 36 6.9 Socioeconomic Resources .................................................................................................... 37 6.10 Meteorological and Oceanographic Hazards......................................................................... 38 7. References ........................................................................................................................................ 38 7.1 General .................................................................................................................................. 38 7.2 Fisheries................................................................................................................................. 38 7.3 Marine Mammals and Sea Turtles ......................................................................................... 39 7.4 Avian and Bat Resources ...................................................................................................... 40 7.5 Water Quality ......................................................................................................................... 41 7.6 Air Quality............................................................................................................................... 41 7.7 Socioeconomic Resources .................................................................................................... 42 7.8 Meteorological and Oceanographic Hazards......................................................................... 42 ii Doc. No. 2916398 Ocean Wind Offshore Wind Farm Site Assessment Plan (Ver. No. 2864961C) List of Tables Table 1-1 Site Assessment Plan Requirements for Commercial Leases Pursuant to §585.105(a), 606(a), 610(a) and (b), and 611(a) and (b) ............................................................................ 3 Table 1-2 Permit Matrix .......................................................................................................................... 5 Table 1-3 Best Management Practices .................................................................................................. 6 Table 2-1 Comparison of EA and SAP Elements ..................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • U.S. Offshore Wind Power Economic Impact Assessment
    U.S. Offshore Wind Power Economic Impact Assessment Issue Date | March 2020 Prepared By American Wind Energy Association Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Current Status of U.S. Offshore Wind .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Lessons from Land-based Wind ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Announced Investments in Domestic Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................ 5 Methodology ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Input Assumptions ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Modeling Tool ........................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Politecnico Di Milano Performance and Cost
    POLITECNICO DI MILANO Scuola di Ingegneria Industriale e dell’Informazione Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Ingegneria Energetica Dipartimento di Energia PERFORMANCE AND COST ASSESSMENT OF INTEGRATED SOLAR COMBINED CYCLES USING DIRECT STEAM GENERATION IN LINEAR COLLECTORS Relatore: Prof. Andrea GIOSTRI Co-Relatore: Prof. Marco BINOTTI Tesi di Laurea di: Angela D’Angelo, matricola 817329 Alessandra Ferrara, matricola 816318 Anno Accademico 2014-2015 Summary The incoming sun radiation can be converted in electricity directly with photovoltaic technology, or transferred to a working fluid and then converted into electric energy into a power plant. Costs of solar thermal collectors employed in stand-alone power plants are noticeably higher than more mature technologies one. A suitable alternative to exploit the solar thermal energy is the integration of solar collectors in already existing fossil-fuelled power plants; in this way, the investment cost of the power block is avoided and solar thermal energy is converted at higher efficiency. The present thesis work presents the analysis of several layouts of Integrated Solar Combined Cycle (ISCCs) in terms of nominal and annual performances and costs of the electricity. In the first part of the work, an analysis of the existing integrated plants and the state of the art of the ISCC technology have been presented. Advantages and disadvantages of the integration of solar collectors in different kind of power plants have been pointed out and a literature review of present studies about ISCCs has been made. Several commercial solar collectors have been analysed and a thermal model has been built to estimate the heat losses of collectors receiver.
    [Show full text]
  • Seminar on Hydraulic 3 ·"' ,,- Laboratory·~ Techniq~Es • , R And·
    Seminar on Hydraulic 3 ·"' ,,- Laboratory·~ Techniq~es • , r and·... Instrutnentation ' '\ -(,,: I ,;;;.,-. ..... '\ . ~ . October l r3, ~1980 l,' ~ ".,/ ',. .. : ~ - . ~~ -~ INTRODUCTION Since 1956 Government laboratories have been meeting to exchange ideas on hydraulic laboratory techniques and instrumentation. These meetings have been held at about 2-year intervals. This seminar was the eleventh of the series and represented a radical departure from the traditional participants. For the first time, university and private laboratories were invited to attend. This outside participation added additional spice to the meetings. To maximize the exchange of information, participation was limited by invitation to the major laboratories in the United States. A strong emphasis was placed upon discussions of what did not work as well as what was successful. In addition to the scheduled talks, an impromptu session was held to discuss "who knows about ?" One of the highlights of the seminar was a panel discussion following the banquet concerning the management of research from the Government, private industry, and university viewpoints. Surprisingly, there were far more similarities than differences between the three types of laboratories. The format of this report is an overall summary of each session, comments on each paper, followed by the papers. It was felt that this format promoted the greatest amount of candid response from the participants. Seminar Agenda Organizing Committee Danny L. King E. J. Carlson Henry T. Falvey Thomas J. Rhone Session
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Monitoring and Mitigation Policies and Practices at Offshore Wind Installations in the United States and Europe
    Ecological Monitoring and Mitigation Policies and Practices at Offshore Wind Installations in the United States and Europe August 2020 Michael C. Allen, Ph.D., Postdoctoral Research Associate, Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, Matthew Campo, Senior Research Specialist, Environmental Analysis & Communications Group, Rutgers University Prepared for the New Jersey Climate Change Alliance (https://njadapt.rutgers.edu/). Working Group Members: John Cecil, New Jersey Audubon Tim Dillingham, American Littoral Society Patty Doerr, The Nature Conservancy of New Jersey Russell Furnari, PSEG Kevin Hassell, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Anthony MacDonald, Urban Coast Institute at Monmouth University Martha Maxwell-Doyle, Barnegat Bay Partnership David Mizrahi, Ph.D., New Jersey Audubon Technical Reviews and Acknowledgments Joseph Brodie, Ph.D. Jeanne Herb Marjorie Kaplan, Dr.P.H. Josh Kohut, Ph.D. Richard Lathrop, Ph.D. Julie Lockwood, Ph.D. Douglas Zemeckis, Ph.D. https://doi.org/doi:10.7282/t3-wn1p-cz80 1 ABSTRACT Offshore wind energy is poised to expand dramatically along the eastern United States. However, the promise of sustainable energy also brings potential impacts on marine ecosystems from new turbines and transmission infrastructure. This whitepaper informs government officials, scientists, and stakeholders in New Jersey about the current policies and monitoring methods other jurisdictions use to monitor potential ecological impacts from offshore wind installations. We reviewed policy documents in the eastern U.S. and Europe, reviewed the scientific literature, and conducted stakeholder interviews in Spring 2020. We found: 1. Short-term (3-5 year) project-specific efforts dominate coordinated regional and project life duration ecological monitoring efforts at offshore wind farms in North America and Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • IMCA D022 the Diving Supervisor's Manual
    AB The International Marine Contractors Association The Diving Supervisor’s Manual IMCA D 022 www.imca-int.com May 2000, incorporating the May 2002 erratum AB The International Marine Contractors Association (IMCA) is the international trade association representing offshore, marine and underwater engineering companies. IMCA promotes improvements in quality, health, safety, environmental and technical standards through the publication of information notes, codes of practice and by other appropriate means. Members are self-regulating through the adoption of IMCA guidelines as appropriate. They commit to act as responsible members by following relevant guidelines and being willing to be audited against compliance with them by their clients. There are two core committees that relate to all members: Safety, Environment & Legislation Training, Certification & Personnel Competence The Association is organised through four distinct divisions, each covering a specific area of members’ interests: Diving, Marine, Offshore Survey, Remote Systems & ROV. There are also four regional sections which facilitate work on issues affecting members in their local geographic area – Americas Deepwater, Asia-Pacific, Europe & Africa and Middle East & India. IMCA D 022 The Diving Supervisor’s Manual was produced for IMCA, under the direction of its Diving Division Management Committee, by Paul Williams. www.imca-int.com/diving The information contained herein is given for guidance only and endeavours to reflect best industry practice. For the avoidance of doubt no legal liability shall attach to any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained. The Diving Supervisor’s Manual First edition, 2000 Published by The International Marine Contractors Association Carlyle House, 235 Vauxhall Bridge Road, London SW1V 1EJ, UK www.imca-int.com © IMCA 2000 ISBN: 1-903513-00-6 The Diving Supervisor’s Manual Chapter 1 - Introduction.........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Brownie's THIRD LUNG
    BrMARINEownie GROUP’s Owner’s Manual Variable Speed Hand Carry Hookah Diving System ADVENTURE IS ALWAYS ON THE LINE! VSHCDC Systems This manual is also available online 3001 NW 25th Avenue, Pompano Beach, FL 33069 USA Ph +1.954.462.5570 Fx +1.954.462.6115 www.BrowniesMarineGroup.com CONGRATULATIONS ON YOUR PURCHASE OF A BROWNIE’S SYSTEM You now have in your possession the finest, most reliable, surface supplied breathing air system available. The operation is designed with your safety and convenience in mind, and by carefully reading this brief manual you can be assured of many hours of trouble-free enjoyment. READ ALL SAFETY RULES AND OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS CONTAINED IN THIS MANUAL AND FOLLOW THEM WITH EACH USE OF THIS PRODUCT. MANUAL SAFETY NOTICES Important instructions concerning the endangerment of personnel, technical safety or operator safety will be specially emphasized in this manual by placing the information in the following types of safety notices. DANGER DANGER INDICATES AN IMMINENTLY HAZARDOUS SITUATION WHICH, IF NOT AVOIDED, WILL RESULT IN DEATH OR SERIOUS INJURY. THIS IS LIMITED TO THE MOST EXTREME SITUATIONS. WARNING WARNING INDICATES A POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS SITUATION WHICH, IF NOT AVOIDED, COULD RESULT IN DEATH OR INJURY. CAUTION CAUTION INDICATES A POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS SITUATION WHICH, IF NOT AVOIDED, MAY RESULT IN MINOR OR MODERATE INJURY. IT MAY ALSO BE USED TO ALERT AGAINST UNSAFE PRACTICES. NOTE NOTE ADVISE OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS THAT REQUIRE PARTICULAR ATTENTION BY THE OPERATOR OR THE MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN FOR PROPER MAINTENANCE AND UTILIZATION OF THE EQUIPMENT. REGISTER YOUR PRODUCT ONLINE Go to www.BrowniesMarineGroup.com to register your product.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Healthcare Consultants
    Plant Healthcare Consultants American Society of Consulting Arborist ▪ International Society of Arboriculture Massachusetts Arborist Association ▪ Massachusetts Tree Wardens and Foresters Association TREE INVENTORIES ▪ APPRAISALS ▪ DIAGNOSIS ▪ TREE RISK ASSESSMENTS Site Impact Study - Tree Assessment & Appraisal Beatrice Circle, Belmont, MA 02478 Prepared for: Timothy Fallon 63 Beatrice Circle Belmont, MA 02478 Prepared by: Daniel E. Cathcart Certified Consulting Arborist Plant Healthcare Consultants 76 Stony Brook Rd Westford, MA 01886 July 6, 2020 Carl A. Cathcart ▪ Daniel E. Cathcart Plant Healthcare Consultants, Partnership 76 Stony Brook Rd. Westford, MA. 01886 ▪ Phone (978) 764-6549 ~ (617) 237-7695 [email protected] ▪ [email protected] ▪ www.treeconsultant.com Site Impact Study – Beatrice Circle, Belmont, MA – July 2020 Table of Contents Summary ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Background & History................................................................................................................................................ 3 Assignment .................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Wind Summit September 25, 30, and October 7
    Offshore Wind Summit September 25, 30, and October 7, 2020 National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & The Embassy of Denmark 1 Introductory Remarks Jessica Rackley, Energy & Environment Program Director, NGA Center for Best Practices Michael Guldbrandtsen, Counselor, Embassy of Denmark Thank You to our Sponsors States with Clean Energy Goals Source: NGA, 2020 Offshore Wind Technical Potential Source: NREL, 2016 Offshore Wind Energy Resource Assessment for the United States Today’s Virtual Meeting: Zoom Controls The Zoom menu bar appears at the If you don’t see the menu bar, move your bottom of the Zoom window once the meeting begins. mouse slightly and the bar will appear. Chat your questions Introductory Remarks Michael Guldbrandtsen Counselor Embassy of Denmark Welcome Remarks Tim Blute Director NGA Center for Best Practices Introduction to the Day – Offshore Wind Update Thomas Brostrøm CEO Ørsted North America, Offshore Offshore Wind Summit Thomas Brostrøm, CEO Ørsted North America, Offshore Offshore Wind Update September 25, 2020 Ranked most sustainable company in the world 2 Significant transformation of Ørsted over the past decade 1 Note 1: Figures taken from Ørsted’s Annual Report 2019. Excluding Radius (power distribution business which was divested during 2019) Note 2: ROCE target for 2019-2025 3 Note 3: International share calculated based on Group EBITDA excl. divestments and miscellaneous un-allocated costs totalling 16 DKKbn The first major energy company to reach net-zero emissions in its energy generation – We will become carbon neutral by 2025. – This will make Ørsted the first major energy company to reach net-zero emissions in its energy generation – far ahead of science-based decarbonization targets for limiting global warming to 1.5°C.
    [Show full text]
  • FIU-DOM-01 Revision-1 12/2019 10
    FIU-DOM-01 Revision -1 12/2019 1 11200 SW 8th Street, Miami Florida, 33199 http://www.fiu.edu TABLE of CONTENTS Section 1.00 GENERAL POLICY 6 1.10 Diving Standards 6 1.20 Operational Control 7 1.30 Consequence of Violation of Regulations by divers 9 1.40 Job Safety Analysis 9 1.50 Dive Team Briefing 10 1.60 Record Maintenance 10 Section 2.00 MEDICAL STANDARDS 11 2.10 Medical Requirements 11 2.20 Frequency of Medical Evaluations 11 2.30 Information Provided Examining Physician 11 2.40 Content of Medical Evaluations 11 2.50 Conditions Which May Disqualify Candidates from Diving (Adapted from Bove, 1998) 11 2.60 Laboratory Requirements for Diving Medical Evaluation and Intervals 12 2.70 Physician's Written Report 13 Section 3.00 ENTRY-LEVEL REQUIRMENTS 14 3.10 General Policy 14 Section 4.00 DIVER QUALIFICATION 14 4.10 Prerequisites 14 4.20 Training 15 4.30 FIU Working Diver Qualification 18 4.40 External (Non-FIU Employee) Diver Qualifications 18 4.50 Depth Certifications 22 4.60 Continuation of FIU Working Diver Certification 22 4.70 Revocation of Certification or Designation 23 4.80 Requalification After Revocation of Diving Privileges 23 4.90 Guest Diver 23 Section 5.00 DIVING REGULATIONS FOR SCUBA (OPEN CIRCUIT, COMPRESSED AIR) 24 5.10 Introduction 24 5.20 Pre-Dive Procedures 24 5.30 Diving Procedures 25 5.40 Post-Dive Procedures 30 5.50 Emergency Procedures 30 5.60 Flying After Diving or Ascending to Altitude (Over 1000 feet) 30 5.70 Record Keeping Requirements 30 FIU-DOM-01 Revision-1 12/2019 2 Section 6.00 SCUBA DIVING EQUIPMENT 32
    [Show full text]
  • NSF Safety and Occupational Health Policy
    The National Science Foundation Office of Polar Programs Polar Environment, Safety & Health PESH-POL_2000.10a Effective Date: August 2018 Safety and Occupational Health Policy Review Date: August 2020 Table of Contents 1. Purpose ......................................................................................................... 1 2. Applicability and Compliance ..................................................................... 1 3. References .................................................................................................... 1 4. Objective ....................................................................................................... 1 5. General Safety Policy .................................................................................. 1 5.1. Responsibilities of Personnel ..................................................................... 2 5.2. Accident prevention ..................................................................................... 2 5.3. Risk Management ......................................................................................... 2 5.4. Suspend Operations .................................................................................... 3 6. Procedures ................................................................................................... 3 6.1. Reviews ......................................................................................................... 3 6.2. Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act Standards ............................. 3 6.3.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Offshore Wind Market Report & Insights 2020
    RAMPION OFFSHORE WIND FARM — COURTESY OF ATKINS THE BUSINESS NETWORK FOR OFFSHORE WIND U.S. OFFSHORE WIND MARKET REPORT & INSIGHTS 2020 MEMBERS ONLY The Business Network for Offshore Wind’s2020 U.S. Offshore Wind Market and Insights offers an analysis of federal and state government activity to better understand how it may affect your business planning and the industry holistically. The federal government has turned its attention to the burgeoning industry to offer more regulation. Congress and federal agencies beyond the Department of Interior’s Bureau of Ocean and Energy Management and U.S. Department of Energy are now affecting how the offshore wind industry will operate into the future. This report also discusses how some of the challenges facing offshore wind are being addressed. The health and safety of workers – whether onshore or offshore – are a paramount tenet within the industry. Particular- ly at this time, the offshore industry remains proactive in its response to the coronavirus epidemic, having put in place telework directives, eliminating unnecessary travel, and following government guidelines. As a result of these protocols, Europe has reported minimal disruptions to the supply chains and the 15 offshore wind projects in the U.S., remain in the planning and development stages. It is too soon to know exactly how the global COVID-19 epidemic disruption will affect the U.S. offshore wind in- dustry. Our main concern centers around the economic hardship a long-term shutdown and recession would place on secondary and tertiary U.S. suppliers. It is important to point out, however, that there is almost 10GWs of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth Marine Reserves Review
    Chapter 3 Assessments of new scientific information to support Commonwealth marine reserve zoning and management decisions The Expert Scientific Panel (ESP) terms of reference included providing advice on options for zoning and allowed uses consistent with the Goals and principles for the establishment of the National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas in Commonwealth waters (the Goals and Principles). Noting the extensive scientific process that underpinned the design of the Commonwealth marine reserves (CMRs) proclaimed in 2012, as outlined in chapter 2, and mindful of work of the Bioregional Advisory Panel (BAP) to identify possible new zoning boundaries for the CMR estate, the ESP focused its work on this term of reference on new science directly relevant to the needs of the BAP. The BAP referred a number of matters to the ESP for advice. These matters related to areas of contention identified through the BAP consultation process. They are listed in table 3.1 and are addressed in this chapter. The associated findings were communicated to the BAP for consideration in formulating recommendations on zoning options. Broadly, these matters related to: • concerns about the applicability of Fishing Gear Risk Assessment (FGRA) findings to certain gear types in certain areas of the CMR estate (section 3.1) • concerns about the impact of recreational fishing (section 3.2) • concerns about the effectiveness of different zone types (section 3.3) • the need to have up-to-date scientific information for particular marine features and particular CMRs (sections 3.4 and 3.5). Table 3.1 Issues referred by the Bioregional Advisory Panel to the Expert Scientific Panel for advice Advice request CMR and/or network to Relevant which the request related section of ESP report Evaluate the process used to determine fishing gear risk for Estate-wide 2.3.5 CMRs.
    [Show full text]