DOCSLIB.ORG

Tribes Approved to Participate in the Section 184 Program on Tribal Lands (Updated June 2020)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tribes Approved to Participate in the Section 184 Program on Tribal Lands (Updated June 2020) Tribes Approved to Participate in the Section 184 Program on Tribal Lands (Updated June 2020) Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town Apache Tribe of Oklahoma Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Reservation Bad River Band of Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians Barona Group of Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians aka Barona Band of Mission Indians Bay Mills Indian Community Bear River Band of the Rohnerville Rancheria Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California Big Lagoon Rancheria Big Sandy Rancheria of Western Mono Indians of California Blackfeet Tribe Blue Lake Rancheria Burns Paiute Tribe Cabazon Band of Mission Indians Cahuilla Band of Indians Catawba Indian Nation aka Catawba Tribe of South Carolina Chemehuevi Indian Tribe Cherokee Nation Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Chippewa Cree Indians of the Rocky Boy's Reservation Chitimacha Tribe of Louisiana Citizen Potawatomi Nation Cocopah Tribe of Arizona Coeur d'Alene Tribe Coharie Tribe Cold Springs Rancheria of Mono Indians of California Comanche Nation Confederated Tribes of Siletz Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Confederated Tribes of the Colville Confederated Tribes of the Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Coquille Indian Tribe Cowlitz Indian Tribe Crow Creek Sioux Tribe Crow Tribe of Montana Delaware Nation Dry Creek Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians Duckwater Shoshone Tribe Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma Eastern Shoshone Tribe of the Wind River Reservation Ely Shoshone Tribe of Nevada Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South Dakota Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa aka Fond du Lac Band of Minnesota Chippewa Forest County Potawatomi Community Fort Belknap Indian Commuity aka Gros Ventre and Assiniboine Tribes of Fort Belknap Fort McDowell Yavapai Tribe Fort Mojave Indian Tribe of Arizona, California and Nevada Gila River Indian Community Grand Portage Band of Minnesota Chippewa Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians Guidiville Rancheria of California Haliwa Saponi Indian Tribe Ho-Chunk Nation of Wisconsin Hoh Indian Tribe Hoopa Valley Tribe Hopi Tribe of Arizona Hopland Band of Pomo Indians Hualapai Indian Tribe Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma Isleta del Sur Pueblo aka Tigua Pueblo Jicarilla Apache Nation Kaibab Band of Paiute Indians Kalispel Indian Community Kashia Band of Pomo Indians of the Stewarts Point Rancheria Kaw Nation Kewa Pueblo formerly known as Pueblo of Santa Domingo Keweenaw Bay Indian Community Kialegee Tribal Town Kickapoo Tribe of Indians of the Kickapoo Reservation in Kansas Kiowa Indian Tribe of Oklahoma Klamath Tribes Kootenai Tribe of Idaho La Jolla Band of Luiseno Indians Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin Lac du Flambeaux Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe aka Leech Lake Band of Minnesota Chippewa Little River Band of Ottowa Indians Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odowa Indians Lower Brule Sioux Tribe Lower Elwha Tribal Community Lower Sioux Indian Community in the State of Minnesota Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina Lummi Tribe Manchester Band of Pomo Indians of the Manchester Rancheria Manzanita Band of Diegueno Mission Indians aka Manzanita Band of Kumeyaay Nation Mashantucket Pequot Indian Tribe Match-e-be-nash-she-wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians of Michigan Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin Mescalero Apache Tribe Miami Tribe of Oklahoma Mississippee Band of Choctaw Indians Mooretown Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California Morongo Band of Mission Indians MOWA Band of Choctaw Indians Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Muscogee (Creek) Nation Narragansett Indian Tribe Navajo Nation Nez Perce Tribe Nisqually Indian Tribe Nooksack Indian Tribe Northern Arapaho aka Arapaho Tribe of the Wind River Reservation Northern Cheyenne Tribe Oglala Sioux Tribe Ohkay Owingeh formerly known as Pueblo of San Juan Oneida Nation Osage Nation Oteo-Missouria Tribe of Indians Paiute-Shoshone Tribe of the Fallon Reservation and Colony Pascua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona Passamaquoddy Tribe of Indian Township Passamaquoddy Tribe of Pleasant Point Pawnee Nation of Oklahoma Penobscot Nation Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma Poarch Band of Creeks aka Poarch Band of Creek Indians Pokagaon Band of Pottawatomi Indians Ponca Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma Ponca Tribe of Nebraska aka Northern Ponca Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation Pueblo of Acoma Pueblo of Cochiti Pueblo of Isleta Pueblo of Jemez Pueblo of Laguna Pueblo of Pojoaque Pueblo of San Felipe Pueblo of San Ildefonso Pueblo of Sandia Pueblo of Santa Ana Pueblo of Santa Clara Pueblo of Tesuque Puyallup Tribe Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe Quapaw Nation Quinault Indian Nation Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin Redwood Valley or Little River Band of Pomo Indians of the Redwood Valley Rancheria Rincon Band of Luiseno Mission Indians Robinson Rancheria Rosebud Sioux Sac and Fox Nation Sac and Fox Nation of Missouri in Kansas and Nebraska Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Samish Indian Nation San Carlos Apache Tribe Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Mission Indians Santa Ysabel Band of Diegueno Mission Indians Santee Sioux Nation, Nebraska Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians Seminole Nation of Oklahoma Seminole Tribe of Florida Seneca Nation of Indians Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of the Duck Valley Reservation Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate formerly Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribe Skokomish Indian Tribe Snoqualmie Indian Tribe Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians Sokaogan Chippewa Community Southern Ute Indian Tribe Spirit Lake Tribe Spokane Tribe Squaxin Island Tribe St. Croix Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin Standing Rock Sioux Tribe Stockbridge-Munsee Community aka Mohican Nation Stockbridge-Munsee Band Suquamish Indian Tribe Susanville Indian Rancheria Swinomish Indian Tribal Community Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians of Nevada The Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Michigan Three Afiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation aka Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation Tolowa Dee-ni' Nation formerly Smith River Rancheria Tulalip Tribes of Washington Tule River Indian Tribe Tunica Buloxi Indian Tribe Tuolumne Band of Me-Wak Indians of the Tuolumne Rancheria Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians of North Dakota United Auburn Indian Community Upper Skagit Indian Tribe Waccamaw Siouan Tribe Wampanoag Tribe of Gayhead (Aquinnah) Washoe Tribes of Nevada and California White Earth Band of Minnesota Chippewa Tribe White Mountain Apache Tribe Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska Witchita and Affiliated Tribes Yankton Sioux Tribe of South Dakota Yarrington Paiute Tribe Yavapai -Prescott Indian Tribe Yavapai-Apache Nation Yurok Tribe Zuni Tribe aka Zuni Pueblo .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Family Type and Incidence
    EVER TOWARDS THE SETTING SUN THEY PUSH US: AMERICAN INDIAN IDENTITY IN THE WRITINGS OF MARY ALICIA OWEN _______________________________________ A Thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri-Columbia _______________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts _____________________________________________________ by GREG OLSON Dr. Susan Flader, Thesis Supervisor Dr. Jeffrey Pasley, Thesis Supervisor JULY 2009 The undersigned, approved by the Dean of the Graduate School, have examined the thesis entitled EVER TOWARDS THE SETTING SUN THEY PUSH US: AMERICAN INDIAN IDENTITY IN THE WRITINGS OF MARY ALICIA OWEN Presented by Greg Olson A candidate for the degree of Master of Arts And hereby certify that in their opinion it is worthy of acceptance. Professor Susan Flader Professor Jeffery Pasley Professor Joanna Hearne To Rebecca Schroeder, who introduced me to the work of Mary Alicia Owen. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the members of my thesis committee for their support, suggestions, and dedication. Their patience and guidance were critical in helping me complete this project. This thesis began as a research paper, which I wrote for Dr. Robert Collins in a history seminar at the University of Missouri-Columbia. Thanks to Dr. Collins and to my fellow students for their ideas and suggestions. I would also like to thank Dr. R. Lee Lyman, chair of the Department of Anthropology at the University of Missouri-Columbia, for taking the time to comment on an early version of this thesis. Thanks also to Bill Stolz at the Western Historical Manuscripts Collection- Columbia, to Kate Kiel and Linda Endersby at the Missouri State Museum, and to the staff of the special collections department of the Missouri Western State University Library for their help in steering me to many of the primary sources used in this project.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Testimony of Tom Wooten, Chairman, Samish Indian Nation
    Testimony of Tom Wooten, Chairman, Samish Indian Nation House Natural Resources Subcommittee on Indian, Insular and Alaska Native Affairs Legislative Hearing on H.R. 2320, the Samish Indian Nation Land Conveyance Act of 2017 November 15, 2017 Introduction Good morning Chairman LaMalfa, Ranking Member Torres, and Members of the Subcommittee. My name is Tom Wooten, Chairman of the Samish Indian Nation (“Tribe”), a federally recognized Indian tribe based in Anacortes, Washington, in the San Juan Islands. The Tribe is comprised of approximately 1,500 citizens. Thank you for this opportunity to testify today on H.R. 2320, the Samish Indian Nation Land Conveyance Act of 2017. H.R. 2320 would provide our Tribe with a small land base that will enable our tribal government to provide basic services to our citizens, address tribal government administrative needs, and give the Samish people more opportunities to participate in our traditional ways of life. On behalf of the Tribe, I extend our tremendous thanks to Congressman Rick Larsen for introducing H.R. 2320. This is the third time Rep. Larsen has introduced this bill. Our quest to obtain a land base for our people has been an extremely long and difficult road, and we greatly appreciate his commitment to assist the Samish Nation in rebuilding our community. I also want to thank Anacortes Mayor Laurie Gere and the City Council of Anacortes for their support and partnership, and for working with us over the past 14 years under a memorandum of agreement for mutual cooperation. I also would like to thank San Juan County Chair Rick Hughes and the County Board, Skagit County Chair Ron Wesen and County Commissioners, as well as our local state delegation for their support of H.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware Indian Land Claims: a Historical and Legal Perspective
    Delaware Indian land Claims: A Historical and Legal Perspective DAVID A. EZZO Alden, New York and MICHAEL MOSKOWITZ Wantagh, New York In this paper we shall discuss Delaware Indian land claims in both a histori­ cal and legal context. The first section of the paper deals with the historical background necessary to understand the land claims filed by the Delaware. In the second part of the paper the focus is on a legal review of the Delaware land claims cases. Ezzo is responsible for the first section while Moskowitz is responsible for the second section. 1. History The term Delaware has been used to describe the descendants of the Native Americans that resided in the Delaware River Valley and other adjacent areas at the start of the 17th century. The Delaware spoke two dialects: Munsee and Unami, both of these belong to the Eastern Algonquian Lan­ guage family. Goddard has noted that the Delaware never formed a single political unit. He also has noted that the term Delaware was only applied to these groups after they had migrated from their original Northeastern homeland. Goddard sums up the Delaware migration as follows: The piecemeal western migration, in the face of white settlement and its attendant pressures during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, left the Delaware in a number of widely scattered places in Southern Ontario, Western New York, Wisconsin, Kansas and Oklahoma. Their history involves the repeated divisions and consolidations of many villages and of local, political and linguistic groups that developed in complicated and incompletely known ways. In addition, individuals, families and small groups were constantly moving from place to place.
    [Show full text]
  • Cowlitz Indian Tribe YOOYOOLAH!
    Cowlitz Indian Tribe Cowlitz Indian Tribe S p r I n g 2 0 1 2 N e w s l e t t e r S p r I n g 2 0 1 2 N e w s l e t t e r YOOYOOLAH!YOOYOOLAH! YOOYOOLAH!YOOYOOLAH! THE CHAIRMAN’S CORNER THE CHAIRMAN’S CORNER It took the U.S. government decades to acknowledge the Cowlitz people It took the U.S. government decades to acknowledge the Cowlitz people as an Indian Tribe. Recognition brought the Cowlitz Tribe minimal fed- as an Indian Tribe. Recognition brought the Cowlitz Tribe minimal fed- eral dollars to operate a sovereign tribal government and offer a range of eral dollars to operate a sovereign tribal government and offer a range of social, housing, and cultural services and to receive health care from the social, housing, and cultural services and to receive health care from the Indian Health Services. Our leaders have accomplished a lot with those Indian Health Services. Our leaders have accomplished a lot with those funds already. funds already. With the announcement in 2002 of our recognition, Chairman John Barnett said, "After all these With the announcement in 2002 of our recognition, Chairman John Barnett said, "After all these years, justice has finally been done. We're not extinct. They are finally recognizing that we've al- years, justice has finally been done. We're not extinct. They are finally recognizing that we've al- ways been here and have always been a historic tribe." After the unsuccessful appeal by the ways been here and have always been a historic tribe." After the unsuccessful appeal by the Quinault Indian Nation, the Interior Department affirmed the earlier decision that acknowl- Quinault Indian Nation, the Interior Department affirmed the earlier decision that acknowl- edged the Cowlitz as a tribe.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Paiute and Western Shoshone Land Use in Northern Nevada: a Class I Ethnographic/Ethnohistoric Overview
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management NEVADA NORTHERN PAIUTE AND WESTERN SHOSHONE LAND USE IN NORTHERN NEVADA: A CLASS I ETHNOGRAPHIC/ETHNOHISTORIC OVERVIEW Ginny Bengston CULTURAL RESOURCE SERIES NO. 12 2003 SWCA ENVIROHMENTAL CON..·S:.. .U LTt;NTS . iitew.a,e.El t:ti.r B'i!lt e.a:b ~f l-amd :Nf'arat:1.iern'.~nt N~:¥G~GI Sl$i~-'®'ffl'c~. P,rceP,GJ r.ei l l§y. SWGA.,,En:v,ir.e.m"me'Y-tfol I €on's.wlf.arats NORTHERN PAIUTE AND WESTERN SHOSHONE LAND USE IN NORTHERN NEVADA: A CLASS I ETHNOGRAPHIC/ETHNOHISTORIC OVERVIEW Submitted to BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Nevada State Office 1340 Financial Boulevard Reno, Nevada 89520-0008 Submitted by SWCA, INC. Environmental Consultants 5370 Kietzke Lane, Suite 205 Reno, Nevada 89511 (775) 826-1700 Prepared by Ginny Bengston SWCA Cultural Resources Report No. 02-551 December 16, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ................................................................v List of Tables .................................................................v List of Appendixes ............................................................ vi CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................1 CHAPTER 2. ETHNOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW .....................................4 Northern Paiute ............................................................4 Habitation Patterns .......................................................8 Subsistence .............................................................9 Burial Practices ........................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal and House District Boundaries
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribal Boundaries and Oklahoma House Boundaries ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 22 ! 18 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 13 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 20 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 7 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Cimarron ! ! ! ! 14 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 11 ! ! Texas ! ! Harper ! ! 4 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! n ! ! Beaver ! ! ! ! Ottawa ! ! ! ! Kay 9 o ! Woods ! ! ! ! Grant t ! 61 ! ! ! ! ! Nowata ! ! ! ! ! 37 ! ! ! g ! ! ! ! 7 ! 2 ! ! ! ! Alfalfa ! n ! ! ! ! ! 10 ! ! 27 i ! ! ! ! ! Craig ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! h ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 26 s ! ! Osage 25 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! a ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribes ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 16 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! W ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 21 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 58 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 38 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribes by House District ! 11 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 Absentee Shawnee* ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Woodward ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 ! 36 ! Apache* ! ! ! 40 ! 17 ! ! ! 5 8 ! ! ! Rogers ! ! ! ! ! Garfield ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 40 ! ! ! ! ! 3 Noble ! ! ! Caddo* ! ! Major ! ! Delaware ! ! ! ! ! 4 ! ! ! ! ! Mayes ! ! Pawnee ! ! ! 19 ! ! 2 41 ! ! ! ! ! 9 ! 4 ! 74 ! ! ! Cherokee ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ellis ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 41 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 72 ! ! ! ! ! 35 4 8 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 5 3 42 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 77
    [Show full text]
  • [Nps-Waso-Nagpra-Nps0031649; Ppwocradn0-Pcu00rp14.R50000]
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 04/01/2021 and available online at federalregister.gov/d/2021-06655, and on govinfo.gov 4312-52 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service [NPS-WASO-NAGPRA-NPS0031649; PPWOCRADN0-PCU00RP14.R50000] Notice of Inventory Completion: Princeton University, Princeton, NJ AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Princeton University has completed an inventory of human remains, in consultation with the appropriate Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations and has determined that there is no cultural affiliation between the human remains and any present-day Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations. Representatives of any Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian organization not identified in this notice that wish to request transfer of control of these human remains should submit a written request to Princeton University. If no additional requestors come forward, transfer of control of the human remains to the Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations stated in this notice may proceed. DATES: Representatives of any Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian organization not identified in this notice that wish to request transfer of control of these human remains should submit a written request with information in support of the request to Princeton University at the address in this notice by [INSERT DATE 30 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: Bryan R. Just, Princeton University Art Museum, Princeton, NJ 08544, telephone (609) 258-8805, email [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is here given in accordance with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence and Decline of the Delaware Indian Nation in Western Pennsylvania and the Ohio Country, 1730--1795
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University) Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2005 The emergence and decline of the Delaware Indian nation in western Pennsylvania and the Ohio country, 1730--1795 Richard S. Grimes West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Grimes, Richard S., "The emergence and decline of the Delaware Indian nation in western Pennsylvania and the Ohio country, 1730--1795" (2005). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 4150. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/4150 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Emergence and Decline of the Delaware Indian Nation in Western Pennsylvania and the Ohio Country, 1730-1795 Richard S. Grimes Dissertation submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Mary Lou Lustig, Ph.D., Chair Kenneth A.
    [Show full text]
  • Cowlitz Tribe Education and Arts Funds
    1 • Cowlitz Tribal News • Fall 2019 Yooyoolah COWLITZ “One who calls” Fall 2019 Tribal News EIGHTH EDITION Cowlitz Tribe Education and Arts Funds Before more than a decade Clark County Council ordinance in 2007 Grant recipients of litigation and acrimony, Chairwoman Eileen Quiring intended to ease A variety of organizations were awarded grants in the first round of awards from the Cowlitz Tribe made a and Councilor Temple Lentz, the anticipated the Cowlitz Tribe Education and Arts Fund. promise to Clark County. the county’s representatives effects of the Late last month, it kept an on the board, said the grant casino. Under the • $5,000 for a one-year grant to the Northwest Film Forum for the development element of that promise. process strengthened the ordinance, the tribe of the film “Buffalo Soldiers of the Pacific Northwest.” The tribe’s Educationrelationship between the agreed to reimburse • $10,000 for a three-year grant to the Ridgefield Lions Club for students and Arts Fund awarded county and tribe. Karissa the county for law in grades 5-8 to manage a 2-acre wetland as part of a collaborative project in $409,000 to seven nonprofit Lowe, chairwoman of enforcement on partnership with the Ridgefield School District and Watershed Alliance of the fund’s board, said it tribal lands and Southwest Washington. organizations in Clark was a chance to build on lost property tax County. The awards are existing community ties. revenue, while also • $25,000 for a one-year grant to Columbia Springs for its on-site education the first made under a program in 2019-20.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Lands of Federally Recognized Tribes of the United States
    132°W 131°W 130°W 129°W 128°W 127°W 126°W 125°W 124°W 123°W 122°W 121°W 120°W 119°W 118°W 117°W 116°W 115°W 114°W 113°W 112°W 111°W 110°W 109°W 108°W 107°W 106°W 105°W 104°W 103°W 102°W 101°W 100°W 99°W 98°W 97°W 96°W 95°W 94°W 93°W 92°W 91°W 90°W 89°W 88°W 87°W 86°W 85°W 84°W 83°W 82°W 81°W 80°W 79°W 78°W 77°W 76°W 75°W 74°W 73°W 72°W 71°W 70°W 69°W 68°W 67°W 66°W 65°W 64°W 63°W 48°N 46°N 47°N Neah Bay 4 35 14 45°N Everett 46°N Taholah CANADA Seattle Nespelem 40 Aberdeen 44°N Wellpinit Browning Spokane 45°N Harlem Belcourt WAS HIN Box Wagner E GTO Plummer Elder IN N MA 10 Pablo E SUPER Wapato IO Poplar K R Toppenish A 43°N New L Town Fort Totten Red Lake NT 44°N O Lapwai RM Portland VE Sault MO Sainte Marie NTANA Cass Lake Siletz Pendleton 42°N K NH NORTH DAKOTA Ashland YOR EW 43°N Warm N Springs LA KE No H r Fort U t Yates Boston hw Billings R TS e Crow ET 41°N s Agency O S t HU Worcester O R N AC RE eg Lame Deer OTA NTARIO SS GON io MINNES E O MA 42°N n Sisseton K A Providence 23 Aberdeen L N I 39 Rochester R A Springfield Minneapolis 51 G Saint Paul T SIN I C WISCON Eagle H 40°N IDA Butte Buffalo Boise HO C I 6 41°N R M o E cky M SOUTH DAKOTA ou K AN ntai ICHIG n R A M egion Lower Brule Fort Thompson L E n Grand Rapids I io New York g 39°N e Milwaukee R Fort Hall R west 24 E d Detroit Mi E 40°N Fort Washakie K WYOMING LA Rosebud Pine Ridge Cleveland IA Redding Wagner AN Toledo LV 32 NSY PEN Philadelphia 38°N Chicago NJ A 39°N IOW Winnebago Pittsburgh Fort Wayne Elko 25 Great Plains Region Baltimore Des Moines MD E NEBRASKA OHIO D
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 74, No. 99/Tuesday, May 26
    24876 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 26, 2009 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR indicated they would not claim the should contact Dr. Jay Reifel, Assistant human remains because they consider Superintendent, Paul H. Karshner National Park Service Decatur Island to be outside of their Memorial Museum, telephone (253) usual and accustomed places. Both the 840–8971, or Ms. Beth Bestrom, Notice of Inventory Completion: Paul Samish Indian Nation and Swinomish Museum Curator, Paul H. Karshner H. Karshner Memorial Museum, Indian Tribal Community have Memorial Museum, telephone (253) Puyallup, WA submitted claims to the Paul H. 841–8748, 309 4th St. NE, Puyallup, WA AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. Karshner Memorial Museum for human 98372, before June 25, 2009. remains from Decatur Island, and each Repatriation of the human remains to ACTION: Notice. tribe provided evidence regarding the Samish Indian Nation, Washington Notice is here given in accordance aboriginal use of Decatur Island. During may proceed after that date if no with the Native American Graves the consultation process, representatives additional claimants come forward. Protection and Repatriation Act of the Swinomish Indian Tribal The Paul H. Karshner Memorial (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3003, of the Community stated that they consider Museum is responsible for notifying the completion of an inventory of human Decatur Island to have been used Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation, remains in the possession of Paul H. primarily by the aboriginal Samish, to Washington; Samish Indian Nation, Karshner Memorial Museum, Puyallup, which the Swinomish Indian Tribal Washington; Swinomish Indian Tribal WA. The human remains were removed Community is an adjudicated legal Community of the Swinomish from Decatur Island, San Juan County, successor in interest (United States v.
    [Show full text]
  • Federally Recognized Indian Tribes
    Appendix C: Federally Recognized Indian Tribes The following tribal entities within the contiguous 48 states are recognized and eligible to receive services from the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs. For further information contact Bureau of Indian Affairs, Division of Tribal Government Services, 1849 C Street N.W., Washington, DC 20240; Telephone number (202) 208-7445.1 Figure C.1 shows the location of the Federally Recognized Tribes. 1. Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma 2. Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians of the Agua Caliente Indian Reservation, California 3. Ak Chin Indian Community of Papago Indians of the Maricopa, Ak Chin Reservation, Arizona 4. Alabama and Coushatta Tribes of Texas 5. Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town of the Creek Nation of Oklahoma 6. Alturas Rancheria of Pit River Indians of California 7. Apache Tribe of Oklahoma 8. Arapahoe Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming 9. Aroostook Band of Micmac Indians of Maine 10. Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Montana 11. Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians of the Augustine Reservation, California 12. Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians of the Bad River Reservation, Wisconsin 13. Bay Mills Indian Community of the Sault Ste. Marie Band of Chippewa Indians Bay Mills. Reservation, Michigan 14. Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California 15. Big Lagoon Rancheria of Smith River Indians of California 1Federal Register, Vol. 61, No. 220, November 13, 1996. C–1 Figure C.1.—Locations of Federally Recognized Indian Tribes and Alaska Native Corporations. C–2 16.
    [Show full text]