DVB); Upper Layer FEC for DVB Systems

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DVB); Upper Layer FEC for DVB Systems ETSI TR 102 993 V1.1.1 (2011-02) Technical Report Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB); Upper Layer FEC for DVB Systems 2 ETSI TR 102 993 V1.1.1 (2011-02) Reference DTR/JTC-DVB-285 Keywords application layer, DVB, FEC, upper layer ETSI 650 Route des Lucioles F-06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex - FRANCE Tel.: +33 4 92 94 42 00 Fax: +33 4 93 65 47 16 Siret N° 348 623 562 00017 - NAF 742 C Association à but non lucratif enregistrée à la Sous-Préfecture de Grasse (06) N° 7803/88 Important notice Individual copies of the present document can be downloaded from: http://www.etsi.org The present document may be made available in more than one electronic version or in print. In any case of existing or perceived difference in contents between such versions, the reference version is the Portable Document Format (PDF). In case of dispute, the reference shall be the printing on ETSI printers of the PDF version kept on a specific network drive within ETSI Secretariat. Users of the present document should be aware that the document may be subject to revision or change of status. Information on the current status of this and other ETSI documents is available at http://portal.etsi.org/tb/status/status.asp If you find errors in the present document, please send your comment to one of the following services: http://portal.etsi.org/chaircor/ETSI_support.asp Copyright Notification No part may be reproduced except as authorized by written permission. The copyright and the foregoing restriction extend to reproduction in all media. © European Telecommunications Standards Institute 2011. © European Broadcasting Union 2011. All rights reserved. DECTTM, PLUGTESTSTM, UMTSTM, TIPHONTM, the TIPHON logo and the ETSI logo are Trade Marks of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members. 3GPPTM is a Trade Mark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members and of the 3GPP Organizational Partners. LTE™ is a Trade Mark of ETSI currently being registered for the benefit of its Members and of the 3GPP Organizational Partners. GSM® and the GSM logo are Trade Marks registered and owned by the GSM Association. ETSI 3 ETSI TR 102 993 V1.1.1 (2011-02) Contents Intellectual Property Rights ................................................................................................................................ 6 Foreword ............................................................................................................................................................. 6 1 Scope ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 2 References ................................................................................................................................................ 7 2.1 Normative references ......................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Informative references ........................................................................................................................................ 7 3 Abbreviations ......................................................................................................................................... 11 4 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 13 4.1 Why upper layer FEC? ..................................................................................................................................... 13 4.2 Definition of upper layer FEC .......................................................................................................................... 15 5 Use case upper layer FEC ...................................................................................................................... 15 5.1 Unidirectional File Delivery ............................................................................................................................. 15 5.2 Streaming TV Services ..................................................................................................................................... 17 5.3 Streaming Layered Error Protection ................................................................................................................. 18 5.3.1 Support of heterogeneous devices and conditional access .......................................................................... 18 5.3.2 Extended service coverage and graceful degradation behaviour ................................................................ 19 5.3.3 Layered Error Protection ............................................................................................................................ 19 5.4 Mobile Data Services over Satellite ................................................................................................................. 20 6 DVB specifications including Upper Layer FEC ................................................................................... 21 6.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 21 6.2 MPE-FEC ......................................................................................................................................................... 21 6.3 MPE-IFEC ........................................................................................................................................................ 22 6.4 Link Layer FEC in DVB RCS+M .................................................................................................................... 22 6.5 AL-FEC in IPDC for File Delivery .................................................................................................................. 23 6.6 AL-FEC in DVB-IPTV for Streaming ............................................................................................................. 23 6.7 AL-FEC in DVB-IPTV for Content Download Services ................................................................................. 24 7 FEC codes for Upper Layer FEC ........................................................................................................... 25 7.1 Metrics for UL-FEC codes ............................................................................................................................... 25 7.1.1 Reception overhead and failure probability ................................................................................................ 25 7.1.2 Encoding and decoding memory requirements ........................................................................................... 25 7.1.3 Encoding and decoding speeds ................................................................................................................... 25 7.1.4 Sensitivity to packet loss ............................................................................................................................. 25 7.1.5 Range of applicable source blocks .............................................................................................................. 25 7.2 Performance Ideal Code ................................................................................................................................... 25 7.3 Reed-Solomon Codes ....................................................................................................................................... 26 7.3.1 Overview .................................................................................................................................................... 26 7.3.2 Specification ............................................................................................................................................... 26 7.3.3 Memory Requirements ............................................................................................................................... 26 7.3.4 Additional Information ............................................................................................................................... 27 7.4 Raptor Codes .................................................................................................................................................... 27 7.4.1 Overview .................................................................................................................................................... 27 7.4.2 Specification ............................................................................................................................................... 28 7.4.3 Memory Requirements ............................................................................................................................... 28 7.4.4 Additional Information ............................................................................................................................... 28 7.5 Comparison of Codes ....................................................................................................................................... 29 8 Basic Design Considerations .................................................................................................................. 29 8.1 UL-FEC Database ............................................................................................................................................ 29 8.1.1 Exogenous Aspects ....................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Tm Synchronization and Channel Coding—Summary of Concept and Rationale
    Report Concerning Space Data System Standards TM SYNCHRONIZATION AND CHANNEL CODING— SUMMARY OF CONCEPT AND RATIONALE INFORMATIONAL REPORT CCSDS 130.1-G-3 GREEN BOOK June 2020 Report Concerning Space Data System Standards TM SYNCHRONIZATION AND CHANNEL CODING— SUMMARY OF CONCEPT AND RATIONALE INFORMATIONAL REPORT CCSDS 130.1-G-3 GREEN BOOK June 2020 TM SYNCHRONIZATION AND CHANNEL CODING—SUMMARY OF CONCEPT AND RATIONALE AUTHORITY Issue: Informational Report, Issue 3 Date: June 2020 Location: Washington, DC, USA This document has been approved for publication by the Management Council of the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS) and reflects the consensus of technical panel experts from CCSDS Member Agencies. The procedure for review and authorization of CCSDS Reports is detailed in Organization and Processes for the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS A02.1-Y-4). This document is published and maintained by: CCSDS Secretariat National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, DC, USA Email: [email protected] CCSDS 130.1-G-3 Page i June 2020 TM SYNCHRONIZATION AND CHANNEL CODING—SUMMARY OF CONCEPT AND RATIONALE FOREWORD This document is a CCSDS Report that contains background and explanatory material to support the CCSDS Recommended Standard, TM Synchronization and Channel Coding (reference [3]). Through the process of normal evolution, it is expected that expansion, deletion, or modification of this document may occur. This Report is therefore subject to CCSDS document management and change control procedures, which are defined in Organization and Processes for the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS A02.1-Y-4). Current versions of CCSDS documents are maintained at the CCSDS Web site: http://www.ccsds.org/ Questions relating to the contents or status of this document should be sent to the CCSDS Secretariat at the email address indicated on page i.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendation Itu-R Bt.2016*
    Recommendation ITU-R BT.2016 (04/2012) Error-correction, data framing, modulation and emission methods for terrestrial multimedia broadcasting for mobile reception using handheld receivers in VHF/UHF bands BT Series Broadcasting service (television) ii Rec. ITU-R BT.2016 Foreword The role of the Radiocommunication Sector is to ensure the rational, equitable, efficient and economical use of the radio-frequency spectrum by all radiocommunication services, including satellite services, and carry out studies without limit of frequency range on the basis of which Recommendations are adopted. The regulatory and policy functions of the Radiocommunication Sector are performed by World and Regional Radiocommunication Conferences and Radiocommunication Assemblies supported by Study Groups. Policy on Intellectual Property Right (IPR) ITU-R policy on IPR is described in the Common Patent Policy for ITU-T/ITU-R/ISO/IEC referenced in Annex 1 of Resolution ITU-R 1. Forms to be used for the submission of patent statements and licensing declarations by patent holders are available from http://www.itu.int/ITU-R/go/patents/en where the Guidelines for Implementation of the Common Patent Policy for ITU-T/ITU-R/ISO/IEC and the ITU-R patent information database can also be found. Series of ITU-R Recommendations (Also available online at http://www.itu.int/publ/R-REC/en) Series Title BO Satellite delivery BR Recording for production, archival and play-out; film for television BS Broadcasting service (sound) BT Broadcasting service (television) F Fixed service M Mobile, radiodetermination, amateur and related satellite services P Radiowave propagation RA Radio astronomy RS Remote sensing systems S Fixed-satellite service SA Space applications and meteorology SF Frequency sharing and coordination between fixed-satellite and fixed service systems SM Spectrum management SNG Satellite news gathering TF Time signals and frequency standards emissions V Vocabulary and related subjects Note: This ITU-R Recommendation was approved in English under the procedure detailed in Resolution ITU-R 1.
    [Show full text]
  • ACRONYMS and ABBREVIATIONS BLUETOOTH SPECIFICATION Version 1.1 Page 914 of 1084
    Appendix III ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS BLUETOOTH SPECIFICATION Version 1.1 page 914 of 1084 Appendix III - Acronyms 914 22 February 2001 BLUETOOTH SPECIFICATION Version 1.1 page 915 of 1084 Appendix III - Acronyms List of Acronyms and Abbreviations Acronym or Writing out in full Which means abbreviation ACK Acknowledge ACL link Asynchronous Connection-Less Provides a packet-switched con- link nection.(Master to any slave) ACO Authenticated Ciphering Offset AM_ADDR Active Member Address AR_ADDR Access Request Address ARQ Automatic Repeat reQuest B BB BaseBand BCH Bose, Chaudhuri & Hocquenghem Type of code The persons who discovered these codes in 1959 (H) and 1960 (B&C) BD_ADDR Bluetooth Device Address BER Bit Error Rate BT Bandwidth Time BT Bluetooth C CAC Channel Access Code CC Call Control CL Connectionless CODEC COder DECoder COF Ciphering Offset CRC Cyclic Redundancy Check CVSD Continuous Variable Slope Delta Modulation D DAC Device Access Code DCE Data Communication Equipment 22 February 2001 915 BLUETOOTH SPECIFICATION Version 1.1 page 916 of 1084 Appendix III - Acronyms Acronym or Writing out in full Which means abbreviation DCE Data Circuit-Terminating Equip- In serial communications, DCE ment refers to a device between the communication endpoints whose sole task is to facilitate the commu- nications process; typically a modem DCI Default Check Initialization DH Data-High Rate Data packet type for high rate data DIAC Dedicated Inquiry Access Code DM Data - Medium Rate Data packet type for medium rate data DTE Data Terminal Equipment In serial communications, DTE refers to a device at the endpoint of the communications path; typi- cally a computer or terminal.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation and Evaluation of Polar Codes in 5G
    Implementation and evaluation of Polar Codes in 5G Implementation och evaluering av Polar Codes för 5G Tobias Rosenqvist Joël Sloof Faculty of Health, Science and Technology Computer Science 15 hp Supervisor: Stefan Alfredsson Examiner: Kerstin Andersson Date: 2019-06-12 Serial number: N/A Implementation and evaluation of Polar Codes in 5G Tobias Rosenqvist, Joël Sloof © 2019 The author(s) and Karlstad University This report is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Bachelor’s degree in Computer Science. All material in this report which is not our own work has been identified and no material is included for which a degree has previously been conferred. Tobias Rosenqvist Joël Sloof Approved, Date of defense Advisor: Stefan Alfredsson Examiner: Kerstin Andersson iii Abstract In today’s society the ability to communicate with one another has grown, were a lot of focus is aimed towards speed in the telecommunication industry. For transmissions to become even faster, there are many ways to enhance transmission speeds of which error correction is one. Padding messages such that they are protected from noise, while using as few bits as possible and ensuring safe transmit is handled by error correction codes. Short codes with low complexity is a solution to faster transmission speeds. An error correction code which has gained a lot of attention since its first appearance in 2009 is Polar Codes. Polar Codes was chosen as the 3GPP standard for 5G control channel. The goal of the thesis is to develop and implement Polar Codes and rate matching according to the 3GPP standard 38.212.
    [Show full text]
  • Applicability of the Julia Programming Language to Forward Error-Correction Coding in Digital Communications Systems
    Applicability of the Julia Programming Language to Forward Error-Correction Coding in Digital Communications Systems A project presented to Department of Computer and Information Sciences State University of New York Polytechnic Institute At Utica/Rome Utica, New York In partial fulfillment Of the requirements of the Master of Science Degree by Ryan Quinn May 2018 Declaration I declare that this project is my own work and has not been submitted in any form for another degree of diploma at any university of other institute of tertiary education. Information derived from published and unpublished work of others has been acknowledged in the text and a list of references given. _ Ryan Quinn 2 | P a g e SUNY POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER AND INFORMATION SCIENCES Approved and recommended for acceptance as a project in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in computer and information science _ DATE _ Dr. Bruno R. Andriamanalimanana Advisor _ Dr. Saumendra Sengupta _ Dr. Scott Spetka 3 | P a g e 1 ABSTRACT Traditionally SDR has been implemented in C and C++ for execution speed and processor efficiency. Interpreted and high-level languages were considered too slow to handle the challenges of digital signal processing (DSP). The Julia programming language is a new language developed for scientific and mathematical purposes that is supposed to write like Python or MATLAB and execute like C or FORTRAN. Given the touted strengths of the Julia language, it bore investigating as to whether it was suitable for DSP. This project specifically addresses the applicability of Julia to forward error correction (FEC), a highly mathematical topic to which Julia should be well suited.
    [Show full text]
  • 16.548 Notes 15: Concatenated Codes, Turbo Codes and Iterative Processing Outline
    16.548 Notes 15: Concatenated Codes, Turbo Codes and Iterative Processing Outline ! Introduction " Pushing the Bounds on Channel Capacity " Theory of Iterative Decoding " Recursive Convolutional Coding " Theory of Concatenated codes ! Turbo codes " Encoding " Decoding " Performance analysis " Applications ! Other applications of iterative processing " Joint equalization/FEC " Joint multiuser detection/FEC Shannon Capacity Theorem Capacity as a function of Code rate Motivation: Performance of Turbo Codes. Theoretical Limit! ! Comparison: " Rate 1/2 Codes. " K=5 turbo code. " K=14 convolutional code. ! Plot is from: L. Perez, “Turbo Codes”, chapter 8 of Trellis Coding by C. Schlegel. IEEE Press, 1997. Gain of almost 2 dB! Power Efficiency of Existing Standards Error Correction Coding ! Channel coding adds structured redundancy to a transmission. mxChannel Encoder " The input message m is composed of K symbols. " The output code word x is composed of N symbols. " Since N > K there is redundancy in the output. " The code rate is r = K/N. ! Coding can be used to: " Detect errors: ARQ " Correct errors: FEC Traditional Coding Techniques The Turbo-Principle/Iterative Decoding ! Turbo codes get their name because the decoder uses feedback, like a turbo engine. Theory of Iterative Coding Theory of Iterative Coding(2) Theory of Iterative Coding(3) Theory of Iterative Coding (4) Log Likelihood Algebra New Operator Modulo 2 Addition Example: Product Code Iterative Product Decoding RSC vs NSC Recursive/Systematic Convolutional Coding Concatenated Coding
    [Show full text]
  • MHOMS: High Speed ACM Modem for Satellite Applications1
    MHOMS : high speed ACM modem for satellite applications Sergio Benedetto, Claude Berrou, Catherine Douillard, Roberto Garello, Domenico Giancristofaro, Alberto Ginesi, Luca Giugno, Marco Luise, G. Montorsi To cite this version: Sergio Benedetto, Claude Berrou, Catherine Douillard, Roberto Garello, Domenico Giancristofaro, et al.. MHOMS : high speed ACM modem for satellite applications. IEEE Wireless Communications, In- stitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2005, 12 (2), pp.66 - 77. 10.1109/MWC.2005.1421930. hal-02137104 HAL Id: hal-02137104 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02137104 Submitted on 22 May 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. MHOMS: High Speed ACM Modem for Satellite Applications1 S. Benedetto(3), C. Berrou(5), C. Douillard(5), R. Garello(3), D. Giancristofaro(1), A. Ginesi(2), L. Giugno(4), M. Luise(4), G. Montorsi(3), (1) Alenia Spazio (2) European Space Agency (3) Politecnico di Torino (4) Università di Pisa (5) ENST Bretagne Table of Contents 1 Introduction......................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Wireless Link Throughput Via Interleaved FEC
    Improving Wireless Link Throughput via Interleaved FEC Ling-Jyh Chen, Tony Sun, M. Y. Sanadidi, Mario Gerla UCLA Computer Science Department, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA {cclljj, tonysun, medy, gerla}@cs.ucla.edu Abstract Traditionally, one of three techniques is used for er- ror-control: 1) Retransmission which uses acknowl- Wireless communication is inherently vulnerable to edgements, and time-outs; 2) Redundancy, and 3) Inter- errors from the dynamic wireless environment. Link leaving [6] [13]. Retransmitting lost packets is an obvi- layer packets discarded due to these errors impose a ous means by which error may be repaired, and it is serious limitation on the maximum achievable through- typically performed at either the link layer with Auto- put in the wireless channel. To enhance the overall matic Repeat reQuest (ARQ) or at the end-to-end layers throughput of wireless communication, it is necessary to with protocols like TCP. When data is exchanged have a link layer transmission scheme that is robust to through a relatively error-free communication medium, the errors intrinsic to the wireless channel. To this end, retransmission is clearly a good tactic. However, re- we present Interleaved-Forward Error Correction (I- transmission is not the best strategy in an error-prone FEC), a clever link layer coding scheme that protects communication channel, where high latency and band- link layer data against random and busty errors. We width overhead are believed to make retransmission a examine the level of data protection provided by I-FEC less than ideal error controlling technique. against other popular schemes. We also simulate I-FEC Redundancy is the means by which repair data is in Bluetooth, and compare the TCP throughput result added along with the original data, such that corrupted with Bluetooth’s integrated FEC coding feature.
    [Show full text]
  • Convolutional Codes in Vss
    CONVOLUTIONAL CODES IN VSS . .. By: Dr. Kurt R. Matis Director of Systems Research SIMULATION OF CONVOLUTIONAL CODES IN VSS This document describes the modeling and simulation of short constraint- length convolutional codes used in conjunction with Viterbi decoding in the Visual System Simulator (VSS). After a brief review of the history and application of convolutional codes, a detailed description of VSS models for encoding/decoding of these codes is presented. Step-by-step examples illustrate how to construct simulations and analyze results. Convolutional Code Basics This note begins with some background information on the use of convolutional codes. The development of convolutional codes is discussed along with a history of important applications. This information is meant to provide a perspective on the selection of the convolutional code models that are provided in VSS. Transmission efficiency and reliability can be improved by encoding information digits in a way that creates an interdependence between symbols which are transmitted over a channel. At the receiving end, the interdependence can be exploited to detect or even correct transmission errors, provided erroneous symbols are not received too frequently. Such coding is called error-control coding and is shown in the configuration of Figure 1. Received Source Encoded Symbols Decoded Symbols Symbols ˆ Symbols {bk } {ai} Channel {bk} Transmitter s(t) Channel r(t) Receiver Channel {âi} Encoder Decoder {rk} Figure 1. System Employing Error-Control Coding Visual System Simulator 1 CONVOLUTIONAL CODES IN VSS Simulation of Convolutional Codes in VSS Encoders for error control are usually called channel encoders to differentiate them from various encoders used for other purposes within digital communication systems.
    [Show full text]
  • LDPC Decoder Design Using Compensation Scheme of Group Comparison for 5G Communication Systems
    electronics Article LDPC Decoder Design Using Compensation Scheme of Group Comparison for 5G Communication Systems Chen-Hung Lin 1,2,* , Chen-Xuan Wang 2 and Cheng-Kai Lu 3 1 Biomedical Engineering Research Center, Yuan Ze University, Jungli 32003, Taiwan 2 Department of Electrical Engineering, Yuan Ze University, Jungli 32003, Taiwan; [email protected] 3 Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Malaysia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: This paper presents a dual-mode low-density parity-check (LDPC) decoding architec- ture that has excellent error-correcting capability and a high parallelism design for fifth-generation (5G) new-radio (NR) applications. We adopted a high parallelism design using a layered decoding schedule to meet the high throughput requirement of 5G NR systems. Although the increase in parallelism can efficiently enhance the throughput, the hardware implementation required to support high parallelism is a significant hardware burden. To efficiently reduce the hardware burden, we used a grouping search rather than a sorter, which was used in the minimum finder with decoding performance loss. Additionally, we proposed a compensation scheme to improve the decoding per- formance loss by revising the probabilistic second minimum of a grouping search. The post-layout implementation of the proposed dual-mode LDPC decoder is based on the Taiwan Semiconduc- Citation: Lin, C.-H.; Wang, C.-X.; Lu, tor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) 40 nm complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) C.-K. LDPC Decoder Design Using Compensation Scheme of Group technology, using a compensation scheme of grouping comparison for 5G communication systems Comparison for 5G Communication with a working frequency of 294.1 MHz.
    [Show full text]
  • Burst Correction Coding from Low-Density Parity-Check Codes
    BURST CORRECTION CODING FROM LOW-DENSITY PARITY-CHECK CODES by Wai Han Fong A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of George Mason University In Partial fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Electrical and Computer Engineering Committee: Dr. Shih-Chun Chang, Dissertation Director Dr. Shu Lin, Dissertation Co-Director Dr. Geir Agnarsson, Committee Member Dr. Bernd-Peter Paris, Committee Member Dr. Brian Mark, Committee Member Dr. Monson Hayes, Department Chair Dr. Kenneth S. Ball, Dean, The Volgenau School of Engineering Date: Fall Semester 2015 George Mason University Fairfax, VA Burst Correction Coding from Low-Density Parity-Check Codes A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at George Mason University By Wai Han Fong Master of Science George Washington University, 1992 Bachelor of Science George Washington University, 1984 Director: Dr. Shih-Chun Chang, Associate Professor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering George Mason University Fairfax, VA Co-Director: Dr. Shu Lin, Professor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of California Davis, CA Fall Semester 2015 George Mason University Fairfax, Virginia Copyright c 2015 by Wai Han Fong All Rights Reserved ii Dedication I dedicate this dissertation to my beloved parents, Pung Han and Soo Chun; my wife, Ellen; children, Corey and Devon; and my sisters, Rose and Agnes. iii Acknowledgments I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my two Co-Directors: Shih-Chun Chang and Shu Lin without whom this would not be possible. In addition, I would especially like to thank Shu Lin for his encouragement, his creativity and his generosity, all of which are an inspiration to me.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Analysis and Design of MIMO-OFDM System Using Concatenated Forward Error Correction Codes
    J. Cent. South Univ. (2017) 24: 1322−1343 DOI: 10.1007/s11771-017-3537-2 Performance analysis and design of MIMO-OFDM system using concatenated forward error correction codes Arun Agarwal1, Saurabh N. Mehta2 1. PhD Scholar, School of Electrical Engineering, Department of Information Technology, AMET University, Tamil Nadu, Chennai 603112, India; 2. Department of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering, Vidyalankar Institute of Technology, Mumbai-400037, Maharashtra, India © Central South University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017 Abstract: This work investigates the performance of various forward error correction codes, by which the MIMO-OFDM system is deployed. To ensure fair investigation, the performance of four modulations, namely, binary phase shift keying (BPSK), quadrature phase shift keying (QPSK), quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM)-16 and QAM-64 with four error correction codes (convolutional code (CC), Reed-Solomon code (RSC)+CC, low density parity check (LDPC)+CC, Turbo+CC) is studied under three channel models (additive white Guassian noise (AWGN), Rayleigh, Rician) and three different antenna configurations(2×2, 2×4, 4×4). The bit error rate (BER) and the peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) are taken as the measures of performance. The binary data and the color image data are transmitted and the graphs are plotted for various modulations with different channels and error correction codes. Analysis on the performance measures confirm that the Turbo + CC code in 4×4 configurations exhibits better performance. Key words: bit error rate (BER); convolutional code (CC); forward error correction; peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR); Turbo code signal reliability as well as the multiple transmissions, 1 Introduction without extra radiation and spectrum bandwidth [6−9].
    [Show full text]