DOCSLIB.ORG

Voluntaryism Day! Additional Resources

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Voluntaryism Day! Additional Resources Voluntaryism Day! Additional Resources: Let’s plant the seeds of freedom in our “Dissenting Electorate: Those Who Refuse to community by celebrating Voluntaryism Vote and the Legitimacy of Their Opposition” Day on the last Monday of May! by Carl Watner and Wendy McElroy What is If you are an individual who deals with “Discourse on Voluntary Servitude” by people in the day to day by non-violent Étienne de La Boétie Voluntaryism means, trade with others on a voluntary basis, share things willingly, allow “Anatomy of the State” by Murray Rothbard others to think, act, or speak differently than you; if you feel that freedom is “Adventures in Legal Land” by Marc Stevens worth defending at any cost, if you feel there is value in the consideration and “The Most Dangerous Superstition” by uplifting of others, if you feel that war is Larken Rose immoral, taxation is theft, if you look at the world around you and are confused “I, Pencil” by Leonard Read and angry at the stark contrast between how the world is as you’ve experienced “Everything Voluntary - From Politics to it versus how you’re told how the world Parenting” by Skyler J. Collins is by governments, media, and by social institutions, chances are... you’re already Get to know local Voluntaryists: practicing voluntaryism, and you didn’t Facebook.com/Groups/LiberateRVA/ even know it. On Voluntaryism Day, help end statism by spreading awareness. Pass out fliers. Hold up signs. Show your community what a free and voluntary society looks like. Live, Love, Liberate For more information and to meet new friends come join us at www.LiberateRVA.com What is Voluntaryism? A Message to You: What is the State? Voluntaryism is everything the state Politicians’ hypocrisy, a floundering economy, The state is a group of individual people is not. It is in fact the antithesis of the an ever-growing prison population, the failing who advocate the initiation of violence to state and state action. It is a philosophy war on drugs, a broken educational system, solve personal and societal problems. by which all human interaction is (and corrupt police, and endless wars all left me should be) undertaken and conducted on wondering if there wasn’t a better way to Number of human beings murdered by a non-violent, non-coercive, and voluntary approach meeting societal needs. As I listened the U.S. government in the name of “war” basis. It is not business at the barrel of to people on both sides of the aisle argue over since WWII: Over 30 million. the ballot, the gun, the club, the taser, who had the solution, I found myself entirely or the cage; it is people interacting and disillusioned by politics. Percentage of human beings kidnapped conducting themselves on a voluntary and and caged by the U.S. government for discretionary basis. It is stability through I had always understood parenting to be one victimless crimes in the name of “criminal plurality and the free market of ideas. of the most effective long-term strategies for justice”in 2009: 86% of the federal prison implementing social change, but what I did not population. The voluntaryist recognizes, internalizes, know was that parenthood would bring me and expresses to the world the maxim to a radically different understanding of how Amount of productivity, property, and that the initiation of force against others humanity ought to interact with one another! wealth stolen by the U.S. government in is inherently at its core, short sighted, Through my research on peaceful parenting the name of “taxation” in 2012: Over $5 mutually demeaning and dehumanizing, and pedagogy, I discovered the philosophy trillion. and immoral. of Voluntaryism. This framework brought me new insight and clarity into the problems I For more information: What is sought through voluntaryism had felt so overwhelmed by before! Suddenly I YouTube.com/LiberateRVA is not a Revolution; revolution is more understood why government repeatedly failed of the same of what we have now on a at what it claimed to be needed for, and what Voluntaryism peacefully and vehemently rotational basis, but what the voluntaryist little it did accomplish was done inefficiently rebukes and refuses to participate in seeks rather is an Evolution by which and often at a tragic cost. Slowly I opened the pervasive, coercive, and destructive humanity is able to manifest its potential my eyes to new possibilities and alternative nature of the state and its violent means and to freely grow past the psychologically solutions to problems I used to believe only of political action by encouraging indoctrinated need for institutions and government could handle. individuals to critically, empirically, for the regulation and control of human and objectively examine and challenge thought and human action. In your hands you are holding the key to the baseline assumptions inherent in the the door of your cage. I invite you to liberate politics of state and rejects the idea that As the butterfly grows and sheds its yourself by engaging in a life-changing using force against others as an offensive cocoon, it must break out so that it may fly, psychological evolution! Educate and act of aggression, for whatever motive or live, and be free. empower yourself with the philosophy to necessity, undermines what it is to exist peacefully change the world one mind at a and what it is ultimately to be human time. beings. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rent-Seeking: a Primer by Sanford Ikeda
    ON LIBERTY November 2003 Vol. 53, No. 10 FEATURES 8 The Economics of Spam by Christopher Westley 10 Business Under German Inflation by Ludwig von Mises 14 Healers Under Siege by Doug Bandow 19 Understanding "Austrian" Economics, Part 2 by Henry Hazlitt 24 Rent-Seeking: A Primer by Sanford Ikeda 29 Grutter v. Bollinger: A Constitutional Embarrassment by George C. Leef 33 Global Warming: Extreme Weather or Extreme Prejudice? by Christopher Lingle 37 The Fallacies of Distributism by Thomas E. Woods, Jr. 4 FROM the PRESIDENT—-The Great German Inflation by Richard M. Ebeling «««« 17 THOUGHTS on FREEDOM—Oblivious to the Obvious by Donald J. Boudreaux 27 PERIPATETICS—Canute's Courtiers Were Wrong by Sheldon Richman 35 OUR ECONOMIC PAST— How the Federal Government Got into the Ocean-Shipping Business by Robert Higgs 47 THE PURSUIT of HAPPINESS—-People Before Profits by Walter E. Williams DEPA RT/V\ E NTS 2 Perspective—Weighing In by Sheldon Richman 6 Massive Foreign Aid Is the Solution to Africa's Ills? It Just Ain't So! by William Thomas 42 Book Reviews Adam Smith's Marketplace of Life by James R. Otteson, reviewed by Robert Batemarco; The Great Tax Wars: Lincoln to Wilson—The Fierce Battles over Money and Power that Transformed the Nation by Steven R. Weisman, reviewed by Burton W. Folsom, Jr.; Pieces of Eight by Edwin Vieira, Jr., reviewed by George C. Leef; Terrorism and Tyranny: Trampling Freedom, Justice, and Peace to Rid the World of Evil by James Bovard, reviewed by Richard M. Ebeling. Published by The Foundation for Economic Education IDEAS Irvington-on-Hudson, NY 10533 Phone: (800) 960-4FEE; (914) 591-7230 PERSPECTIVE ON LIBERTY Fax: (914) 591-8910; E-mail: [email protected] FEE Home Page: www.fee.org Weighing In President: Richard M.
    [Show full text]
  • Markets Not Capitalism Explores the Gap Between Radically Freed Markets and the Capitalist-Controlled Markets That Prevail Today
    individualist anarchism against bosses, inequality, corporate power, and structural poverty Edited by Gary Chartier & Charles W. Johnson Individualist anarchists believe in mutual exchange, not economic privilege. They believe in freed markets, not capitalism. They defend a distinctive response to the challenges of ending global capitalism and achieving social justice: eliminate the political privileges that prop up capitalists. Massive concentrations of wealth, rigid economic hierarchies, and unsustainable modes of production are not the results of the market form, but of markets deformed and rigged by a network of state-secured controls and privileges to the business class. Markets Not Capitalism explores the gap between radically freed markets and the capitalist-controlled markets that prevail today. It explains how liberating market exchange from state capitalist privilege can abolish structural poverty, help working people take control over the conditions of their labor, and redistribute wealth and social power. Featuring discussions of socialism, capitalism, markets, ownership, labor struggle, grassroots privatization, intellectual property, health care, racism, sexism, and environmental issues, this unique collection brings together classic essays by Cleyre, and such contemporary innovators as Kevin Carson and Roderick Long. It introduces an eye-opening approach to radical social thought, rooted equally in libertarian socialism and market anarchism. “We on the left need a good shake to get us thinking, and these arguments for market anarchism do the job in lively and thoughtful fashion.” – Alexander Cockburn, editor and publisher, Counterpunch “Anarchy is not chaos; nor is it violence. This rich and provocative gathering of essays by anarchists past and present imagines society unburdened by state, markets un-warped by capitalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Libertarianism, Feminism, and Nonviolent Action: a Synthesis
    LIBERTARIAN PAPERS VOL. 4, NO. 2 (2012) LIBERTARIANISM, FEMINISM, AND NONVIOLENT ACTION: A SYNTHESIS GRANT BABCOCK* I. Introduction MURRAY ROTHBARD’S CONTRIBUTION to libertarian ethics was to outline a theory prohibiting aggressive violence (1978, p. 27-30). The influence of Rothbard’s ethics,1 combined with a decades-long political alliance with conservatives based on anticommunism, has produced a debate within libertarian circles about whether libertarians qua libertarians must take positions against certain forms of repression that do not involve aggressive violence. The non-aggression principle is as good a libertarian litmus test as has been suggested. Often, the voices who levy allegations of non-aggressive (or at least not exclusively aggressive) oppression come from the political left, and have un-libertarian (read: aggressive) solutions in mind, even if they do not conceive of those solutions as violent. Despite these considerations, I do believe that libertarians qua libertarians are obligated to say something about the kind of non-aggressive oppression that these voices from the left have raised regarding issues including, but not limited to, race, class, gender, and sexual orientation. Making the case that libertarians have these obligations irrespective of their * Grant Babcock ([email protected]) is an independent scholar. My thanks to Robert Churchill, Matthew McCaffrey, Ross Kenyon, and two anonymous referees for their help and encouragement. The paper’s merits are largely a result of their influence; any remaining errors are my own. CITATION INFORMATION FOR THIS ARTICLE: Grant Babcock. 2012. “Libertarianism, Feminism, and Nonviolent Action: A Synthesis.” Libertarian Papers. 4 (2): 119-138. ONLINE AT: libertarianpapers.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Libertarian Feminism: Can This Marriage Be Saved? Roderick Long Charles Johnson 27 December 2004
    Libertarian Feminism: Can This Marriage Be Saved? Roderick Long Charles Johnson 27 December 2004 Let's start with what this essay will do, and what it will not. We are both convinced of, and this essay will take more or less for granted, that the political traditions of libertarianism and feminism are both in the main correct, insightful, and of the first importance in any struggle to build a just, free, and compassionate society. We do not intend to try to justify the import of either tradition on the other's terms, nor prove the correctness or insightfulness of the non- aggression principle, the libertarian critique of state coercion, the reality and pervasiveness of male violence and discrimination against women, or the feminist critique of patriarchy. Those are important conversations to have, but we won't have them here; they are better found in the foundational works that have already been written within the feminist and libertarian traditions. The aim here is not to set down doctrine or refute heresy; it's to get clear on how to reconcile commitments to both libertarianism and feminism—although in reconciling them we may remove some of the reasons that people have had for resisting libertarian or feminist conclusions. Libertarianism and feminism, when they have encountered each other, have most often taken each other for polar opposites. Many 20th century libertarians have dismissed or attacked feminism—when they have addressed it at all—as just another wing of Left-wing statism; many feminists have dismissed or attacked libertarianism—when they have addressed it at all—as either Angry White Male reaction or an extreme faction of the ideology of the liberal capitalist state.
    [Show full text]
  • No State Required? a Critical Review of the Polycentric Legal Order
    No State Required? A Critical Review of the Polycentric Legal Order John K. Palchak* & Stanley T. Leung** TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ..................................... 290 II. THE Two VISIONS OF ANARCHY ........................ 295 III. RANDY BARNETT'S THE STRUCTURE OF LIBERTY ............ 305 A. Barnett's PhilosophicalJustifications: Human Nature and NaturalLaw ..................... 306 B. Barnett's Discussion of the Problem of Knowledge ....... 309 1. Types of Knowledge ............................ 309 2. Methods of Social Ordering ...................... 310 3. Discovering Justice-First-Order Problem of Knowledge ................................. 312 4. Communicating Justice-Second-Order Problem of Knowledge .......................... 313 5. Specifying Conventions-Third-Order Problem of Knowledge .......................... 313 C. Barnett's Discussion of the Problem of Interest ......... 316 1. Partiality Problem ............................. 316 2. Incentive Problems ............................. 317 3. Compliance Problems .......................... 317 D. Barnett's Discussion of the Problem of Power .......... 320 1. Fighting Crime Without Punishment ................ 320 2. Enforcement Abuse ............................ 321 E. Barnett's Solution: The Polycentric Legal Order ........ 322 IV. LAW, LEGITIMACY, AND SOCIAL WELFARE .................. 326 * J.D., University of Illinois College of Law; B.A., Penn State University. Special thanks to Tom Ginsburg for his encouragement and numerous suggestions. Thanks to Tom Ulen, Richard McAdams, John Kindt, Duane Stewart, and Mark Fabiani. Also thanks to Ed Crane and Tom Palmer of the Cato Institute, and to the contributors to the Cato scholarship fund, for providing an opportunity to attend the 2000 Cato Summer Seminar in Rancho Bernardo, California that was the genesis of this Article. Appreciation is also expressed to Jesse T. Mann, Dean of Westminster College for the use of research facilities in New Wilmington, Pennsylvania. **. J.D., M.D., MBA, University of Illinois; A.B., Columbia University.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tensions Between Feminism and Libertarianism: a Focus on Prostitution, 3 Wash
    Washington University Jurisprudence Review Volume 3 | Issue 1 2011 The eT nsions Between Feminism and Libertarianism: A Focus on Prostitution Nahid Sorooshyari Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_jurisprudence Part of the Jurisprudence Commons Recommended Citation Nahid Sorooshyari, The Tensions Between Feminism and Libertarianism: A Focus on Prostitution, 3 Wash. U. Jur. Rev. 167 (2011). Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_jurisprudence/vol3/iss1/6 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Jurisprudence Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE TENSIONS BETWEEN FEMINISM AND LIBERTARIANISM: A FOCUS ON PROSTITUTION NAHID SOROOSHYARI* INTRODUCTION This Note explores the tensions between feminism and libertarianism. In practice, feminism and libertarianism align on several issues. Historically, feminists and libertarians fought together to abolish legal barriers to women's participation in the economy and in the political system.' Currently, feminists and libertarians align on the issues of abortion and birth control.2 Any overlap between the two philosophies is, however, shallow. For feminists, patriarchy is the enemy, and it exists today despite the legal equality of women.3 For libertarians, the state is the enemy, and institutional harm to women only exists in the government- sanctioned oppression of women.4 Now that there are no legally- sanctioned barriers to women's participation in economic and political life,5 but still inequality between the genders,6 the tension between feminism and libertarianism is illuminated.
    [Show full text]
  • Murray N. Rothbard: Mr. Libertarian
    Murray N. Rothbard: Mr. Libertarian di Wendy McElroy Murray N. Rothbard (1926-1995) – the greatest libertarian theorist of the 20th century – expressed what he considered to be the central political issue confronting mankind. He wrote, “My own basic perspective on the history of man...is to place central importance on the great conflict which is eternally waged between Liberty and Power.”1 Liberty v. Power. In its most blatant form, the struggle manifests itself as war between the peaceful, productive individual and the intrusive State that usurps those products. The tension between freedom and authority is hardly a new subject for political commentary. But Rothbard managed to bring a newness to everything he touched intellectually. Rothbard was a system builder. Unsatisfied with past attempts to present a “philosophy of freedom,” Rothbard sought to create an interdisciplinary system of thought that used the struggle between Liberty and Power as its integrating theme. He explained, “Strands and remnants of libertarian doctrines are, indeed, all around us. ... But only libertarianism takes these strands and remnants and integrates them into a mighty, logical, and consistent system.”2 Without such a systematic world view, he believed Liberty could not succeed. In forty-five years of scholarship and activism, Rothbard produced over two dozen books and thousands of articles that made sense of the world from a radical individualist perspective. In doing so, it is no exaggeration to say that Rothbard created the modern libertarian movement.3 Specifically, he refined and fused together: • natural law theory, using a basic Aristotelian or Randian approach; • the radical civil libertarianism of 19th century individualist-anarchists, especially Lysander Spooner and Benjamin Tucker; • the free market philosophy of Austrian economists, in particular Ludwig von Mises, into which he incorporated sweeping economic histories; and, • the foreign policy of the American Old Right – that is, isolationism.
    [Show full text]
  • Against Authority 4 Introduction
    Against Authority Hogeye Bill Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 4 What is Legitimacy? ..................................................................................................................... 7 What is Property? ....................................................................................................................... 12 What is Aggression? ................................................................................................................... 18 The Anarchist Alternative ........................................................................................................... 24 Listen Egoist! .............................................................................................................................. 29 Panarchy Unbound ..................................................................................................................... 39 A Brief History of Anarchist Thought ........................................................................................ 43 The First Positive Anarchist..................................................................................................... 46 The French Connection............................................................................................................ 52 The Economistes .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ind 13-1 Corrected
    The INDEPENDENT NEWSLETTER OF THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE VOLUME XIII, NUMBER 1 Illuminating What Liberty for Women Governments Hide Widely Acclaimed o help shed light on the War on Terrorism, he Independent Institute is pleased to an- T recent Independent Policy Forums have ex- T nounce the publication of a landmark book, amined government secrecy regarding Iraq, the Liberty for Women: Freedom and Feminism Vietnam War and the National Security Agency: in the Twenty-first Century, edited by Indepen- • SECRECY, FREEDOM AND EMPIRE: dent Institute research fellow Wendy McElroy. Lessons for Today from Vietnam and the Pen- Liberty for Women examines a wide vari- tagon Papers (Oct. 23): Daniel Ellsberg be- ety of topics from the perspective of the new gan his career as a U.S. Marine company com- individualist feminism that goes beyond the dominant attitudes of today’s feminist ortho- doxy. Rooted in the pro-freedom ethos of the (clockwise from top left) Daniel Ellsberg, David Kirp, Barton Bernstein, Edwin Firmage, David Henderson, and Jonathan Marshall at the Independent Policy Fo- rum, “Secrecy, Freedom and Empire.” mander, a Pentagon official, and a staunch sup- porter of U.S. global intervention. But, in Oc- tober 1969, Ellsberg smuggled out and made public a 7,000-page, top-secret study of deci- (continued on page 3) IN THIS ISSUE: 19th century anti-slavery movement (whose leaders were among the first champions of Independent Policy Forums .............. 1 women’s rights), individualist feminism is based Liberty for Women............................... 1 upon the right of all human beings to protect President’s Letter ............................... 2 their persons and property.
    [Show full text]
  • Center for Libertarian Studies Records
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt4290334k No online items Inventory of the Center for Libertarian Studies records Finding aid prepared by Hoover Institution staff and Tess McCarthy Hoover Institution Archives 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA, 94305-6010 (650) 723-3563 [email protected] © 2008, 2015 Inventory of the Center for 96043 1 Libertarian Studies records Title: Center for Libertarian Studies records Date (inclusive): 1961-1986 Date (bulk): 1977-1984 Collection Number: 96043 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Archives Language of Material: English Physical Description: 5 manuscript boxes(1.9 linear feet) Abstract: Correspondence, reports, conference papers, draft journal articles, proposals, agenda, and financial records relating to libertarianism. Physical Location: Hoover Institution Archives Creator: Center for Libertarian Studies. Access Collection is open for research. The Hoover Institution Archives only allows access to copies of audiovisual items. To listen to sound recordings or to view videos or films during your visit, please contact the Archives at least two working days before your arrival. We will then advise you of the accessibility of the material you wish to see or hear. Please note that not all audiovisual material is immediately accessible. Publication Rights For copyright status, please contact the Hoover Institution Archives. Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Center for Libertarian Studies records, [Box number], Hoover Institution Archives. Acquisition Information Acquired by the Hoover Institution Archives in 1996. Accruals Materials may have been added to the collection since this finding aid was prepared. To determine if this has occurred, find the collection in Stanford University's online catalog at http://searchworks.stanford.edu/ .
    [Show full text]
  • An Anarchist FAQ — Section G Contents
    An Anarchist FAQ — Section G Contents Section G: Is individualist anarchism capitalistic? 3 G.1 Are individualist anarchists anti-capitalist? 10 G.1.1 What about their support of the free market? .................... 18 G.1.2 What about their support of "private property"? . 25 G.1.3 What about their support for wage labour? ..................... 30 G.1.4 Why is the social context important in evaluating individualist anarchism? . 39 G.2 Why do individualist anarchists reject social anarchism? 45 G.2.1 Is communist-anarchism compulsory? ........................ 46 G.2.2 Is communist-anarchism violent? .......................... 51 G.2.3 Does communist-anarchism aim to destroy individuality? . 55 G.2.4 What other reasons do individualists give for rejecting communist-anarchism? . 58 G.2.5 Do most anarchists agree with the individualists on communist-anarchism? . 62 G.3 Is ”anarcho”-capitalism a new form of individualist anarchism? 64 G.3.1 Is "anarcho"-capitalism American anarchism? ................... 69 G.3.2 What are the differences between "anarcho"-capitalism and individualist anar- chism? ......................................... 74 G.3.3 What about "anarcho"-capitalists' support of "defence associations"? . 81 G.3.4 Why is individualist anarchist support for equality important? . 86 G.3.5 Would individualist anarchists have accepted "Austrian" economics? . 88 G.3.6 Would mutual banking simply cause inflation? ................... 91 G.4 Why do social anarchists reject individualist anarchism? 99 G.4.1 Is wage labour consistent with anarchist principles? . 114 G.4.2 Why do social anarchists think individualism is inconsistent anarchism? . 122 G.5 Benjamin Tucker: capitalist or anarchist? 129 G.6 What are the ideas of Max Stirner? 137 G.7 Lysander Spooner: right-”libertarian” or libertarian socialist? 146 2 Section G: Is individualist anarchism capitalistic? The short answer is, no, it is not.
    [Show full text]
  • Contra Copyright, Again
    LIBERTARIAN PAPERS VOL. 3, ART. NO. 12 (2011) CONTRA COPYRIGHT, AGAIN WENDY MCELROY* Retrospective ERNEST HEMINGWAY ONCE WROTE, “If you are lucky enough to have lived in Paris as a young man, then wherever you go for the rest of your life, it stays with you, for Paris is a moveable feast.” Los Angeles in the early ’80s was like that for libertarians. It brimmed over with supper clubs, student groups, small magazines, debates and conferences. Given the concentration of high-quality scholars and activists in the area, the explosion of activity was inevitable. Although the new-born Libertarian Party was extremely active, the circles in which I ran were generally anti-political or apathetic about electoral politics. They included the cadre gathered around Robert LeFevre, a sprinkling of Objectivists (mostly admirers of Nathaniel Branden), a few Galambosians, and as many Rothbardians as I could meet. And, then, Carl Watner, George H. Smith and I established our own unique circle by creating The Voluntaryist newsletter and re-introducing the term Voluntaryist back into the libertarian mainstream. A libertarian used book store named Lysander’s Books that I co-owned became the center of Voluntaryism. One intellectual circle in particular exerted a profound influence on the development of my thinking on intellectual property: the anarcho-capitalists who banded around Samuel Konkin III (or, as he preferred, SEK3), many of whom lived in the same apartment complex as SEK3; the complex became *Wendy McElroy ([email protected]) is author of several books and maintains two active websites: wendymcelroy.com and ifeminists.com.
    [Show full text]