DOCSLIB.ORG

Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology MINNESOTA JOURNAL OF LAW, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY VOLUME 14 WINTER 2013 ISSUE 1 Technopanics, Threat Inflation, and the Danger of an Information Technology Precautionary Principle by Adam Thierer This article originally appeared in Issue 14.1 of the Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology (Winter 2013) and should be cited as: 14 Minn. J. L. Sci. & Tech. 309 (2013) It can be found online at: http://purl.umn.edu/144225 Visit http://mjlst.umn.edu to view the issue in which this article appears or for more information about the Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology THIERER_PROOF (DO NOT DELETE) 2/11/2013 10:53 AM Technopanics, Threat Inflation, and the Danger of an Information Technology Precautionary Principle Adam Thierer* I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................. 311 II. ARGUMENTUM IN CYBER-TERROREM: A FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING FEAR APPEALS ........................................................................ 312 A. Appeals to Fear as an Argumentation Device .......... 312 B. Deconstructing Fear Appeal Arguments: The Violent Media Case Study ....................................... 313 C. Technopanics .............................................................. 315 D. Threat Inflation ......................................................... 317 1. Cybersecurity Threat Inflation ........................... 318 2. Online Safety Threat Inflation ............................ 320 3. Online Privacy Threat Inflation .......................... 325 4. EconoMic- and Business-Related Threat Inflation .............................................................. 329 III. REASONS PESSIMISM DOMINATES DISCUSSIONS ABOUT THE INTERNET AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY .............................................................. 332 A. Generational Differences ........................................... 333 B. Hyper-Nostalgia, Pessimistic Bias, and Soft Ludditism ................................................................. 335 C. Bad News Sells: The Role of the Media, Advocates, and the Listener .................................... 337 D. The Role of Special Interests and Industry Infighting ................................................................. 338 E. Elitist Attitudes Among AcadeMics and Intellectuals ............................................................. 344 F. The Role of “Third-Person-Effect Hypothesis” .......... 345 © 2013 Adam Thierer * Senior Research Fellow, Mercatus Center at George Mason Universi- ty. The author wishes to thank the following individuals for helpful thoughts on various drafts of this article: Paul Dragos Aligica, Jerry Brito, Will Rine- hart, Adam Marcus, Gregory Conko, and two anonyMous reviewers. 309 THIERER_PROOF (DO NOT DELETE) 2/11/2013 10:53 AM 310 MINN. J. L. SCI. & TECH. [Vol. 14:1 IV. TYING IT ALL TOGETHER: FEAR CYCLES .................. 347 V. WHY TECHNOPANICS AND THREAT INFLATION ARE DANGEROUS ........................................................ 350 A. Foster Animosities and Suspicions Among the Citizenry ................................................................... 351 B. Create Distrust of Many Institutions, Especially the Press ................................................................... 351 C. Often Divert Attention from Actual, Far More Serious Risks ............................................................ 351 D. Lead to Calls for Information Control....................... 352 VI. WHEN PANIC BECOMES POLICY: THE RISE OF AN INFO-TECH “PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE” ... 352 A. A Range of Responses to Theoretical Risk ................ 356 B. The Perils of “Playing it Safe” ................................... 361 C. Anticipation vs. Resiliency ........................................ 364 D. Case Studies: Applying the Resiliency Model to Information Technology Issues ............................... 368 1. Online Child Safety, Privacy, and Reputation Management ....................................................... 368 2. Cybersecurity ....................................................... 373 3. Market Power and EconoMic Issues ................... 374 E. Resiliency Makes Even More Sense When Practicality of Control is Considered ...................... 376 VII. A FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING AND ADDRESSING TECHNOLOGY RISK .......................... 379 A. Defining the Problem ................................................. 380 B. Consider Legal and EconoMic Constraints ............... 381 C. Consider Alternative, Less Restrictive Approaches ............................................................... 383 D. Evaluate Actual Outcomes ........................................ 384 VIII. CONCLUSION ................................................................. 385 THIERER_PROOF (DO NOT DELETE) 2/11/2013 10:53 AM 2013] TECHNOPANICS 311 I. INTRODUCTION “In time we hate that which we often fear.”1 William Shakespeare Fear is an extreMely powerful Motivational force. In public policy debates, appeals to fear are often used in an attempt to sway opinion or bolster the case for action. Such appeals are used to convince citizens that threats to individual or social well-being may be avoided only if specific steps are taken. Of- ten these steps take the form of anticipatory regulation based on the precautionary principle. Such “fear appeal arguments” are frequently on display in the Internet policy arena and often take the form of a full- blown “moral panic” or “technopanic.”2 These panics are intense public, political, and acadeMic responses to the eMergence or use of media or technologies, especially by the young.3 In the extreMe, they result in regulation or censorship. While cyberspace has its fair share of troubles and trou- blemakers, there is no evidence that the Internet is leading to greater problems for society than previous technologies did.4 That has not stopped some from suggesting there are reasons to be particularly fearful of the Internet and new digital tech- nologies.5 There are various individual and institutional factors 1. WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE, Antony and Cleopatra act 1, sc. 3, line 12, in THE COMPLETE WORKS OF WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE 1127, 1132 (Stanley Wells & Gary Taylor eds., Clarendon Press 1986). 2. AdaM Thierer, Parents, Kids, & Policymakers in the Digital Age: Safe- guarding Against “Techno-Panics,” INSIDE ALEC (Am. Legislative Exch. Council, D.C.), July 2009, at 16, 16–17 [hereinafter Safeguarding Against Technopanics], available at http://www.pff.org/issues-pubs/articles/090715- against-technopanics-adam-thierer-Inside-ALEC.pdf. See also Josh Constine, Selling Digital Fear, TECHCRUNCH (Apr. 7, 2012), http://techcrunch.coM/ 2012/04/07/selling-digital-fear (discussing public panic about availability of private information online). 3. See Safeguarding Against Technopanics, supra note 2, at 16 (“[S]ocial and cultural debates quickly becoMe political debates.”). 4. See Adam Thierer, Fact and Fiction in the Debate over Video Game Regulation, PROGRESS ON POINT (Progress & Freedom Found., D.C.), Mar. 2006, at 20–21 [hereinafter Fact and Fiction], available at http://www.pff.org/issues-pubs/pops/pop13.7videogaMes.pdf (identifying a de- crease in youth murder, rape, robbery, assault, alcohol and drug abuse, teen birth rates, high school dropout rates, and suicide rates). 5. Cf. Alice E. Marwick, To Catch a Predator? The MySpace Moral Panic, FIRST MONDAY (June 2, 2008), http://firstMonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/ index.php/fm/article/view/2152/1966 (giving examples of reasons some are fearful of the Internet, but arguing that these reasons are not based on eMpir- ical evidence). THIERER_PROOF (DO NOT DELETE) 2/11/2013 10:53 AM 312 MINN. J. L. SCI. & TECH. [Vol. 14:1 at work that perpetuate fear-based reasoning and tactics. This paper will consider the structure of fear appeal argu- ments in technology policy debates, and then outline how those arguments can be deconstructed and refuted in both cultural and econoMic contexts. Several exaMples of fear appeal argu- ments will be offered with a particular focus on online child safety, digital privacy, and cybersecurity. The various factors contributing to “fear cycles” in these policy areas will be docu- mented. To the extent that these concerns are valid, they are best addressed by ongoing societal learning, experimentation, resili- ency, and coping strategies rather than by regulation. If steps must be taken to address these concerns, education- and em- powerMent-based solutions represent superior approaches to dealing with theM compared to a precautionary principle ap- proach, which would limit beneficial learning opportunities and retard technological progress. II. ARGUMENTUM IN CYBER-TERROREM: A FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING FEAR APPEALS This section outlines the rhetorical framework at work in many information technology policy debates today, and ex- plains why logical fallacies underlie many calls for regulation. Subsequent sections will show how these logical fallacies give rise to “technopanics” and “fear cycles.” A. APPEALS TO FEAR AS AN ARGUMENTATION DEVICE Rhetoricians eMploy several closely related types of “ap- peals to fear.” Douglas Walton, author of Fundamentals of Crit- ical Argumentation, outlines the argumentation scheme for “fear appeal arguments” as follows: “Fearful Situation Premise: Here is a situation that is fearful to you.”6 “Conditional Premise: If you carry out A, then the negative consequences portrayed in this fearful sit- uation will happen to you.”7 “Conclusion: You should not carry out A.”8 6. DOUGLAS WALTON, FUNDAMENTALS
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2006 Ballot Measure Overview
    2006 BALLOT MEASURE OVERVIEW AN A NALYSIS O F TH E MON EY RAISED A RO UND MEASU RES O N STA TE BA LLO TS I N 2006 By THE N ATIO NA L IN STI TU TE O N MON EY IN STA TE PO LI TI CS NOVEMBER 5, 2007 833 NORTH LAST CHANCE GULCH, SECOND FLOOR • HELENA, MT • 59601 PHONE 406-449-2480 • FAX 406-457-2091 • E-MAIL [email protected] www.followthemoney.org The National Institute on Money in State Politics is the only nonpartisan, nonprofit organization revealing the influence of campaign money on state-level elections and public policy in all 50 states. Our comprehensive and verifiable campaign-finance database and relevant issue analyses are available for free through our Web site FollowTheMoney.org. We encourage transparency and promote independent investigation of state-level campaign contributions by journalists, academic researchers, public-interest groups, government agencies, policymakers, students and the public at large. 833 North Last Chance Gulch, Second Floor • Helena, MT 59601 Phone: 406-449-2480 • Fax: 406-457-2091 E-mail: [email protected] www.FollowTheMoney.org This publication was made possible by grants from: JEHT Foundation, Fair and Participatory Elections Carnegie Corporation of New York, Strengthening U.S. Democracy Ford Foundation, Program on Governance and Civil Society The Pew Charitable Trusts, State Policy Initiatives Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Program on Democratic Practice The statements made and the views expressed are solely the responsibility of the Institute. National Institute on Money in State Politics
    [Show full text]
  • Rent-Seeking: a Primer by Sanford Ikeda
    ON LIBERTY November 2003 Vol. 53, No. 10 FEATURES 8 The Economics of Spam by Christopher Westley 10 Business Under German Inflation by Ludwig von Mises 14 Healers Under Siege by Doug Bandow 19 Understanding "Austrian" Economics, Part 2 by Henry Hazlitt 24 Rent-Seeking: A Primer by Sanford Ikeda 29 Grutter v. Bollinger: A Constitutional Embarrassment by George C. Leef 33 Global Warming: Extreme Weather or Extreme Prejudice? by Christopher Lingle 37 The Fallacies of Distributism by Thomas E. Woods, Jr. 4 FROM the PRESIDENT—-The Great German Inflation by Richard M. Ebeling «««« 17 THOUGHTS on FREEDOM—Oblivious to the Obvious by Donald J. Boudreaux 27 PERIPATETICS—Canute's Courtiers Were Wrong by Sheldon Richman 35 OUR ECONOMIC PAST— How the Federal Government Got into the Ocean-Shipping Business by Robert Higgs 47 THE PURSUIT of HAPPINESS—-People Before Profits by Walter E. Williams DEPA RT/V\ E NTS 2 Perspective—Weighing In by Sheldon Richman 6 Massive Foreign Aid Is the Solution to Africa's Ills? It Just Ain't So! by William Thomas 42 Book Reviews Adam Smith's Marketplace of Life by James R. Otteson, reviewed by Robert Batemarco; The Great Tax Wars: Lincoln to Wilson—The Fierce Battles over Money and Power that Transformed the Nation by Steven R. Weisman, reviewed by Burton W. Folsom, Jr.; Pieces of Eight by Edwin Vieira, Jr., reviewed by George C. Leef; Terrorism and Tyranny: Trampling Freedom, Justice, and Peace to Rid the World of Evil by James Bovard, reviewed by Richard M. Ebeling. Published by The Foundation for Economic Education IDEAS Irvington-on-Hudson, NY 10533 Phone: (800) 960-4FEE; (914) 591-7230 PERSPECTIVE ON LIBERTY Fax: (914) 591-8910; E-mail: [email protected] FEE Home Page: www.fee.org Weighing In President: Richard M.
    [Show full text]
  • Markets Not Capitalism Explores the Gap Between Radically Freed Markets and the Capitalist-Controlled Markets That Prevail Today
    individualist anarchism against bosses, inequality, corporate power, and structural poverty Edited by Gary Chartier & Charles W. Johnson Individualist anarchists believe in mutual exchange, not economic privilege. They believe in freed markets, not capitalism. They defend a distinctive response to the challenges of ending global capitalism and achieving social justice: eliminate the political privileges that prop up capitalists. Massive concentrations of wealth, rigid economic hierarchies, and unsustainable modes of production are not the results of the market form, but of markets deformed and rigged by a network of state-secured controls and privileges to the business class. Markets Not Capitalism explores the gap between radically freed markets and the capitalist-controlled markets that prevail today. It explains how liberating market exchange from state capitalist privilege can abolish structural poverty, help working people take control over the conditions of their labor, and redistribute wealth and social power. Featuring discussions of socialism, capitalism, markets, ownership, labor struggle, grassroots privatization, intellectual property, health care, racism, sexism, and environmental issues, this unique collection brings together classic essays by Cleyre, and such contemporary innovators as Kevin Carson and Roderick Long. It introduces an eye-opening approach to radical social thought, rooted equally in libertarian socialism and market anarchism. “We on the left need a good shake to get us thinking, and these arguments for market anarchism do the job in lively and thoughtful fashion.” – Alexander Cockburn, editor and publisher, Counterpunch “Anarchy is not chaos; nor is it violence. This rich and provocative gathering of essays by anarchists past and present imagines society unburdened by state, markets un-warped by capitalism.
    [Show full text]
  • 2003 Annual Report
    2003 Annual Report Gay & Lesbian Victory Fund and Leadership Institute 1705 DeSales Street NW, Suite 500 Washington DC 20036 202 842.8679 main 202 289.3863 fax www.victoryfund.org Find out how you can through. www.victoryinstitute.org a through is www.victoryfund.org www.victoryinstitute.org designed and produced by see see eye / Atlanta the first lesbian elected to the U. S. Congress. U.S. Representative Tammy Baldwin Wisconsin 2nd Congressional District Dane County Board of Supervisors 1986–1994 Wisconsin State Assembly 1992–1998 First elected to Congress in 1998 Victory Fund endorsed 1992–2004 First lesbian elected to U.S. Congress 1 the first openly gay African-American mayor popularly elected in U.S. 2 Mayor – Palm Springs, California Mayor Ron Oden Appointed to Palm Springs City Council in 1995; Elected in 1998 Elected mayor in 2003 Victory Fund endorsed 2000, 2003 First openly gay African-American mayor popularly elected in U.S. 3 increasing the number of openly gay public officials more than fivefold in just over a decade. 4 Victory has invested millions of dollars to help LGBT candidates get elected and advance professionally. 5 sending gay and lesbian officials and leaders to the best leadership training in the country. 6 Victory has provided hundreds of thousands of dollars in fellowships to LGBT individuals who have been accepted by Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government. 7 a professionally managed forum where hundreds of openly LGBT public officials can exchange ideas and build on their success. 8 Victory has enabled hundreds of LGBT officials from around the world to meet and advance their leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • Libertarianism, Feminism, and Nonviolent Action: a Synthesis
    LIBERTARIAN PAPERS VOL. 4, NO. 2 (2012) LIBERTARIANISM, FEMINISM, AND NONVIOLENT ACTION: A SYNTHESIS GRANT BABCOCK* I. Introduction MURRAY ROTHBARD’S CONTRIBUTION to libertarian ethics was to outline a theory prohibiting aggressive violence (1978, p. 27-30). The influence of Rothbard’s ethics,1 combined with a decades-long political alliance with conservatives based on anticommunism, has produced a debate within libertarian circles about whether libertarians qua libertarians must take positions against certain forms of repression that do not involve aggressive violence. The non-aggression principle is as good a libertarian litmus test as has been suggested. Often, the voices who levy allegations of non-aggressive (or at least not exclusively aggressive) oppression come from the political left, and have un-libertarian (read: aggressive) solutions in mind, even if they do not conceive of those solutions as violent. Despite these considerations, I do believe that libertarians qua libertarians are obligated to say something about the kind of non-aggressive oppression that these voices from the left have raised regarding issues including, but not limited to, race, class, gender, and sexual orientation. Making the case that libertarians have these obligations irrespective of their * Grant Babcock ([email protected]) is an independent scholar. My thanks to Robert Churchill, Matthew McCaffrey, Ross Kenyon, and two anonymous referees for their help and encouragement. The paper’s merits are largely a result of their influence; any remaining errors are my own. CITATION INFORMATION FOR THIS ARTICLE: Grant Babcock. 2012. “Libertarianism, Feminism, and Nonviolent Action: A Synthesis.” Libertarian Papers. 4 (2): 119-138. ONLINE AT: libertarianpapers.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Libertarian Feminism: Can This Marriage Be Saved? Roderick Long Charles Johnson 27 December 2004
    Libertarian Feminism: Can This Marriage Be Saved? Roderick Long Charles Johnson 27 December 2004 Let's start with what this essay will do, and what it will not. We are both convinced of, and this essay will take more or less for granted, that the political traditions of libertarianism and feminism are both in the main correct, insightful, and of the first importance in any struggle to build a just, free, and compassionate society. We do not intend to try to justify the import of either tradition on the other's terms, nor prove the correctness or insightfulness of the non- aggression principle, the libertarian critique of state coercion, the reality and pervasiveness of male violence and discrimination against women, or the feminist critique of patriarchy. Those are important conversations to have, but we won't have them here; they are better found in the foundational works that have already been written within the feminist and libertarian traditions. The aim here is not to set down doctrine or refute heresy; it's to get clear on how to reconcile commitments to both libertarianism and feminism—although in reconciling them we may remove some of the reasons that people have had for resisting libertarian or feminist conclusions. Libertarianism and feminism, when they have encountered each other, have most often taken each other for polar opposites. Many 20th century libertarians have dismissed or attacked feminism—when they have addressed it at all—as just another wing of Left-wing statism; many feminists have dismissed or attacked libertarianism—when they have addressed it at all—as either Angry White Male reaction or an extreme faction of the ideology of the liberal capitalist state.
    [Show full text]
  • Billionaire LGBT Activist Paul Singer Partners with Christians to Reach Millennials
    Billionaire LGBT Activist Paul Singer Partners with Christians to Reach Millennials NATIONAL GAY AND HOBBY LESBIAN TASK LOBBY FORCE ACTION AMERICAN FUND UNITY FUND MUSEUM OF THE BIBLE AMERICAN UNITY PAC FREEDOM PASSAGES FOR ALL ISRAEL AMERICANS YOUNG CONSERVATIVES THE PHILOS PAUL E. LGBT FOR THE PROJECT SINGER UNIVERSITY FREEDOM TO FOUNDATION MARRY AMERICAN UNITY FUND – Created for the purpose of advancing LGBT causes in conservatism and backed by Paul Singer. AMERICAN UNITY PAC – A Super PAC launched by Paul Singer to elect pro-LGBT advocates to federal office. FREEDOM FOR ALL AMERICANS – Paul Singer partnered with Quark founder Tim Gill to start this pro-LGBT group. The group lists Hobby Lobby as an “enemy of equality” for giving money to the National Christian Foundation, a donor-advised fund. HOBBY LOBBY – Donated to MOTB. Steve Green is President of the company and also serves as Chairman of the Museum of the Bible. LGBT UNIVERSITY – LGBT University is a program of Freedom For All Americans to train young LGBT activists. MUSEUM OF THE BIBLE (MOTB) – Steve Green is Chairman of MOTB. President Cary Summers was involved with organizing Passages Israel and worked to obtain funding from Paul Singer and The Philos Project. MOTB leases office space from Hobby Lobby and pays a salary to Steve Green, President of Hobby Lobby. Since 2011, MOTB has had a traveling exhibit about the history of the Bible, called Passages. NATIONAL GAY AND LESBIAN TASK FORCE ACTION FUND – Funded by the Paul E. Singer Foundation PASSAGES ISRAEL – A tour and training program to reach Christian student leaders created in 2015 and jointly funded by the Museum of the Bible and Paul Singer through a nonprofit organization, The Philos Project.
    [Show full text]
  • SRA111: Introduction to Security and Risk Analysis
    SRA111: Introduction to Security and Risk Analysis Course Description SRA 111 is an introductory course with a broad focus, spanning primarily the areas of security, risk, and risk analysis. In addition to familiarizing the student with basic security terminology, it will also touch upon social and legal issues, risk analysis and mitigation, crime intelligence and forensics, and information warfare and assurance. This course will motivate students to understand the requirements for security in any government agency or business organization through the use of case studies. Included in this segment are cases related to cyberterrorism, bioterrorism, and critical infrastructure protection. Some concepts to be covered in the area of information security are: confidentiality, integrity, availability, and non- repudiation. Various methods of safeguarding these security concerns will be discussed, such as: single- and multi-factor authentication, encryption, digital signatures, prevention of denial of service attacks, and so forth. This course also covers social and legal issues related to security, in particular identity theft and social engineering. Topics in this section include identity theft, spam, spyware, and adware. This course also covers the basic principles and the approaches to risk analysis. Here students study vulnerability analysis, crime and intelligence analysis, forensics, techniques for risk assessment and risk mitigation. The course will prepare students for more in-depth courses such as SRA 211, SRA 221 and SRA 311. This course will incorporate collaborative and action-learning experiences wherever appropriate. Emphasis will be placed on developing and practicing writing and speaking skills through application of the concepts that define the course. Course Objectives Upon completion of the course, the student will: • Understand basic security concepts, terminology and possible solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • No State Required? a Critical Review of the Polycentric Legal Order
    No State Required? A Critical Review of the Polycentric Legal Order John K. Palchak* & Stanley T. Leung** TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ..................................... 290 II. THE Two VISIONS OF ANARCHY ........................ 295 III. RANDY BARNETT'S THE STRUCTURE OF LIBERTY ............ 305 A. Barnett's PhilosophicalJustifications: Human Nature and NaturalLaw ..................... 306 B. Barnett's Discussion of the Problem of Knowledge ....... 309 1. Types of Knowledge ............................ 309 2. Methods of Social Ordering ...................... 310 3. Discovering Justice-First-Order Problem of Knowledge ................................. 312 4. Communicating Justice-Second-Order Problem of Knowledge .......................... 313 5. Specifying Conventions-Third-Order Problem of Knowledge .......................... 313 C. Barnett's Discussion of the Problem of Interest ......... 316 1. Partiality Problem ............................. 316 2. Incentive Problems ............................. 317 3. Compliance Problems .......................... 317 D. Barnett's Discussion of the Problem of Power .......... 320 1. Fighting Crime Without Punishment ................ 320 2. Enforcement Abuse ............................ 321 E. Barnett's Solution: The Polycentric Legal Order ........ 322 IV. LAW, LEGITIMACY, AND SOCIAL WELFARE .................. 326 * J.D., University of Illinois College of Law; B.A., Penn State University. Special thanks to Tom Ginsburg for his encouragement and numerous suggestions. Thanks to Tom Ulen, Richard McAdams, John Kindt, Duane Stewart, and Mark Fabiani. Also thanks to Ed Crane and Tom Palmer of the Cato Institute, and to the contributors to the Cato scholarship fund, for providing an opportunity to attend the 2000 Cato Summer Seminar in Rancho Bernardo, California that was the genesis of this Article. Appreciation is also expressed to Jesse T. Mann, Dean of Westminster College for the use of research facilities in New Wilmington, Pennsylvania. **. J.D., M.D., MBA, University of Illinois; A.B., Columbia University.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Principles at Work in the Investigative-Journalism Genre
    Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law Volume 15 Issue 1 Issue 1 - Fall 2012 Article 4 2012 To Catch a Lawsuit: Constitutional Principles at Work in the Investigative-Journalism Genre Michael F. Dearington Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/jetlaw Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the First Amendment Commons Recommended Citation Michael F. Dearington, To Catch a Lawsuit: Constitutional Principles at Work in the Investigative- Journalism Genre, 15 Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law 117 (2020) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/jetlaw/vol15/iss1/4 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To Catch a Lawsuit: Constitutional Principles at Work in the Investigative-Journalism Genre ABSTRACT This Note examines two causes of action, civil rights violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and IIED claims, in the context of lawsuits against investigative journalists. Examining two recent cases in particular, Tiwari v. NBC Universal, Inc. and Conradt v. NBC Universal, Inc., which arise out of NBC's conduct in its primetime series To Catch a Predator, this Note concludes that legal standards governing conduct by investigative journalists are currently unclear. Investigative journalists are not adequately on notice as to when they might be liable under § 1983 for violating a subject's civil rights. And district courts have failed to appreciate journalists'First Amendment rights when analyzing IIED claims.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning from Other Movements: Gay Liberation and Recovery Advocacy
    Hill, T. & White, W. (2015). Learning from other movements: Gay liberation and recovery advocacy. Posted at www.williamwhitepapers.com Learning from other Movements: Gay Liberation and Recovery Advocacy Tom Hill and William White1 Introduction For participants of the current recovery advocacy movement, there is much to learn from previous social movements. Lessons of considerable import can be gleaned from the movements that intersected in the 1960s, including the civil rights movement, the black power movement, the new left and anti-war movements, the women’s movement, and the gay liberation movement. While all of these are worthy of study, the gay liberation movement holds certain parallels, strategies, and lessons that may be of particular interest. This is due in large part to the societal myths and misunderstandings of both people who have experienced addiction and those with diverse sexual orientations and gender identities. The stigma attached to these groups has often rendered them expendable and, as a result, has forced them into hiding their experiences and identities. Members of the gay community, most prominently Bayard Rustin, played critical roles in the civil rights movement and later drew upon the lessons of the civil rights movement in the same way that members of the recovery advocacy movement are now drawing upon their experience within earlier social movements. Because the societal stigma and discrimination targeting these two groups have been so severe, they share similarities in the early stages of building a movement of social justice and change. The gay liberation movement – now inclusive of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) lives and identities – currently has 45 years of organizing and movement-building experience compared to the new recovery advocacy movement that emerged in the late 1990s and was formally organized at the 2001 recovery summit in St.
    [Show full text]
  • H.R. 5319, the Deleting Online Predators Act of 2006
    H.R. 5319, THE DELETING ONLINE PREDATORS ACT OF 2006 HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND THE INTERNET OF THE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JULY 11, 2006 Serial No. 109-121 Printed for the use of the Committee on Energy and Commerce Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/house U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 30-410PDF WASHINGTON : 2006 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001 COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE JOE BARTON, Texas, Chairman RALPH M. HALL, Texas JOHN D. DINGELL, Michigan MICHAEL BILIRAKIS, Florida Ranking Member Vice Chairman HENRY A. WAXMAN, California FRED UPTON, Michigan EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts CLIFF STEARNS, Florida RICK BOUCHER, Virginia PAUL E. GILLMOR, Ohio EDOLPHUS TOWNS, New York NATHAN DEAL, Georgia FRANK PALLONE, JR., New Jersey ED WHITFIELD, Kentucky SHERROD BROWN, Ohio CHARLIE NORWOOD, Georgia BART GORDON, Tennessee BARBARA CUBIN, Wyoming BOBBY L. RUSH, Illinois JOHN SHIMKUS, Illinois ANNA G. ESHOO, California HEATHER WILSON, New Mexico BART STUPAK, Michigan JOHN B. SHADEGG, Arizona ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York CHARLES W. “CHIP” PICKERING, Mississippi ALBERT R. WYNN, Maryland Vice Chairman GENE GREEN, Texas VITO FOSSELLA, New York TED STRICKLAND, Ohio ROY BLUNT, Missouri DIANA DEGETTE, Colorado STEVE BUYER, Indiana LOIS CAPPS, California GEORGE RADANOVICH, California MIKE DOYLE, Pennsylvania CHARLES F. BASS, New Hampshire TOM ALLEN, Maine JOSEPH R.
    [Show full text]