25 Lahs 81 BACK COVER
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Bosworth at Redemore: Focus and Context
Bosworth at Redemore: Focus and Context PETER J. FOSS THE MOST SIGNIFICANT local document to come to light in recent years (that is, since my work of the 1980s) relevant to the location of the battle of Bosworth is a demesne terrier belonging to the Abbey of St Mary de Pratis (Leicester Abbey) identified by Professor Barrie Cox in his contribution to the archaeological survey undertaken by the Battlefields Trust in 2005–09. The document1 is dated to between 1467 and 1484 and itemises fields, furlongs and meadows in the township of Stoke Golding (‘Stoke’) at the end of the fifteenth century, on the cusp of the battle of Bosworth. I would like here to offer a brief examination of this document and, together with other local records, show how it helps to focus on the place where the battle of Bosworth was fought, and how this reflects on the context of the archaeological discoveries made in 2009. I would also like to correct and rebal- ance a number of recent misconceptions. A Leicester Abbey Demesne Terrier The document identifies three open fields – Halmorefelde, Garbrodfelde and Whytmorefelde – which can be equated roughly with later named areas (from the early seventeenth century at least) in the same parish; that is, the later-named ‘Crownehillfielde’ with Garbrodfelde, ‘Milnehillfield’ with Whytmorefelde, and Halmorefelde with the area that lay south of the manor-house and its park (the ‘Park’ and ‘Great Pasture’ marked on Trimnell’s map of 1637).2 The inference has been made, reasonably, that the change of name from Garbrodfelde to Crownehillfelde -
20/00470/FUL Applicant: Owl Partnerships Ltd Ward: Barlestone Nailstone and Osbaston
Planning Committee 30 March 2021 Report of the Planning Manager Planning Ref: 20/00470/FUL Applicant: Owl Partnerships Ltd Ward: Barlestone Nailstone And Osbaston Site: Garden Farm Bagworth Road Barlestone Proposal: Residential development of 99 dwellings with associated infrastructure, vehicular accesses and areas of open space © Crown copyright. All rights reserved Hinckley & Bosworth Borough Council LA00018489 Published 2006 1. Recommendations 1.1. Grant planning permission subject to The completion within six months of this resolution a S106 agreement to secure the following obligations: 100% Affordable Housing with a split of 50 units as affordable rented and 49 units as shared ownership £3,170.00 for library facilities at Newbold Verdon Library £4,903.00 towards improving existing waste facilities at Barwell HWRC £50,124.93 towards Health Care Provision (GP Practices) On-site Open Space requirement of 356.4m2 of equipped play area with equipment to a minimum value of £64,839;85; 1663.22 of Casual/Informal Play Space and 8965m2 of natural green space along with maintenance costs. £48,302.07 towards secondary school education at The Market Bosworth School. Travel Packs – one per dwelling (can be supplied by LCC at £52.85 per pack) 6 month bus passes – two per dwelling (2 application forms to be included in Travel Packs and funded by the developer) – can be supplied through LCC at £360.00 per pass. Travel Plan monitoring fee of £6,000. Traffic Regulation Order cost of £7,500. Planning conditions outlined at the end of this report 1.2. That the Planning Manager be given powers to determine the final detail of planning conditions. -
APPENDIX B Report of the Director of Environment Planning Committee 2
APPENDIX B Report of the Director of Environment Planning Committee 2 April 2008 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL REPORT 1. Background Papers For the purposes of Section 100 (d) of the Local Government (Access to Information) Act 1985 all consultation replies listed in this report, along with the application documents and any accompanying letters or reports submitted by the applicant, constitute Background Papers which are available for inspection, unless such documents contain Exempt Information as defined in the Act. 2. Late Information: Verbal Updates Any information relevant to the determination of any application presented for determination in this Report, which is not available at the time of printing, will be reported in summarised form on the 'UPDATE SHEET' which will be distributed at the meeting. Any documents distributed at the meeting will be made available for inspection. 3. Expiry of Representation Periods In cases where recommendations are headed "Subject to no contrary representations being received by ..... [date]" decision notices will not be issued where representations are received within the specified time period which relate to matters not previously raised.. 4. Delegation of Wording of Decision Notices Where a decision is reached contrary to the recommendation printed in the report, the wording of the reasons for refusal or planning conditions, as the case may be, is hereby delegated to the Director of Environment. 5. Decisions on Items of the Director of Environment The Chairman will call each item in the report. No vote will be taken at that stage unless a proposition is put to alter or amend the printed recommendation. Where a proposition is put and a vote taken the item will be decided in accordance with that vote. -
Stoke Golding Neighbourhood Plan – Submission Version
Stoke Golding Neighbourhood Plan: Submission 2020-2039 Stoke Golding Neighbourhood Plan: Submission Welcome to the Neighbourhood Plan for Stoke Golding. The plan is a culmination of the results of the 2016 questionnaire and consultations with local parishioners, businesses and other stake holders which shows how we would like to see our village evolve. It recognises the rural character of our Parish as well as its unique heritage. The plan appreciates that Stoke Golding residents would like to have a greater influence on the overall shape and development of their village over the next few years in many areas including biodiversity, maintaining important views, protecting our heritage and landscape, renewable energy, infrastructure and open spaces. It also determines what type of housing should take place and where we would choose to put it. The production of the plan has been led by the Neighbourhood Plan Advisory Committee on behalf of the Parish Council. I would like to take this opportunity to thank everyone who has been involved in the process along the way. Without their dedication and hours of voluntary work, this plan just would not have been possible. I would also like to thank all of you for your support and patience. It has taken a long time due to the nature of the process. Stoke Golding is a lovely, friendly, vibrant village and we would like to maintain that for future generations. Rachel Terheege Chair Stoke Golding Parish Council i Stoke Golding Neighbourhood Plan: Submission Contents Site Selection .......................................................................................................15 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 Housing Reserve Site: Mulberry Farm, High Street ..............................16 Neighbourhood Plans ......................................................................................... -
Leicestershire
Archaeological Investigations Project 2003 Post-Determination & Non-Planning Related Projects East Midlands LEICESTERSHIRE Blaby 3/25 (E.31.L024) SP 57609800 LE2 9TL GLEN PARVA MOAT, THE FORD, LITTLE GLEN ROAD An Archaeological watching Brief at Glen Parva Moat Hyam, A Leicester : University of Leicester Archaeological Services, 2003, 7pp, refs Work undertaken by: University of Leicester Archaeological Services There was high potential for buried archaeological remains as the site incorporated a moat which is a Scheduled Monument. A shallow pathway 0.15 to 0.2m in depth was excavated in a circular route to the west of the Moat revealing mid grey-brown topsoil on top of grey-brown silty loam subsoil. No archaeological features were observed. Foundations for a site access bridge and gates were also excavated revealing dark brown silty loam above the natural substrate of orange-brown silty clay. No archaeological features or deposits were recorded. [Au(adp)] 3/26 (E.31.L026) SP 50309645 LE9 3JQ POTTERS KILN, STANTON LANE CROFT An Archaeological Watching Brief at Potters Kiln, Stanton Lane, Croft Jarvis, W Leicester : University of Leicester Archaeological Services, 2003, 13pp, figs, tabs Work undertaken by: University of Leicester Archaeological Services An archaeological watching brief was carried out during the groundworks for a new m#nage and associated access road and car park. No archaeological deposits were identified, with artefacts being restricted to occasional unstratified finds of Potter's Marston ware, probably from manuring of the fields. These finds were restricted to the south of the area. [Au(adp)] Archaeological periods represented: PM 3/27 (E.31.Q011) SP 49109470 LE9 4DQ TUDOR COTTAGE, CAREY HILL ROAD, STONEY STANTON An Archaeological Impact Assessment Concerning the Impact of Proposed Works to be Carried Out on the Grade II Listed Building Known as: Tudor Cottage, Carey Hill, Stoney Stanton. -
Bosworth Battlefield
BOSWORTH BATTLEFIELD A Reassessment Glenn Foard 2004 This report has been prepared by Glenn Foard FSA MIFA for Chris Burnett Associates on behalf of Leicestershire County Council. Copyright © Leicestershire County Council & Glenn Foard 2004 Cover picture: King Richard’s Field as depicted on Smith’s map of Leicestershire of 1602 Page 2 22/07/2005 BOSWORTH BATTLEFIELD A Reassessment Glenn Foard Page 3 22/07/2005 Figure 1: A view by Rimmer (1898) of the Ambion Hill site looking east, showing King Richard's Well. This is the battlefield as currently interpreted at the Battlefield Centre, which now occupies the farm in the background. Page 4 22/07/2005 CONTENTS CONTENTS.............................................................................................................................. 5 List of Illustrations.................................................................................................................... 7 Acknowledgements................................................................................................................... 8 Copyright .................................................................................................................................. 9 Abbreviations............................................................................................................................ 9 SUMMARY............................................................................................................................ 10 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... -
Mineral and Waste Safeguarding [Hinckley & Bosworth Borough] Document S4/2014
Mineral and Waste Safeguarding [Hinckley & Bosworth Borough] Document S4/2014 October 2014 0 1 Contents Contents Mineral Safeguarding 1 Figure HK1: Areas of borough/district for mineral safeguarding, categorised by mineral type 1 Waste Safeguarding 2 Table HK1: Waste sites in borough/district for safeguarding 2 Figure HK2: Location in borough/district of waste sites for safeguarding 3 Detailed location plans for each waste site for safeguarding in borough/district 4 Barlestone STW 4 Barwell RHWS 5 Breach Lane SPS, Earl Shilton 6 Brindley Road Hinckley & Jacknell Road Hinckley 7 Cliffe Hill Quarry 8 Earl Shilton STW 9 Glebe Farm Sibson, Sibson & Shenton STW, & Stubble Hill Farm, Shenton 10 Hinckley STW, Logix Park Hinckley, Sketchley Meadows Hinckley, Watling Street – Augean & Watling Street - Veolia 11 Kirkby Mallory STW 12 Lynden Lea, Hinckley 13 Market Bosworth STW 14 Newbold Verdon STW 15 Norton Juxta Twycross STW 16 Orton on the Hill STW 17 Sapcote Road SPS, Aston Firs 18 Station Road, Market Bosworth 19 Watling Street, Red Lion Farm 20 Neville Arms STW & Wiggs Farm, Ellistown 21 i Mineral Safeguarding Figure HK1: Areas of borough/district for mineral safeguarding, categorised by mineral type Legend Clay Coal Gypsum Igneous Rock Limestone Sand & gravel 1 Waste Safeguarding Table HK1: Waste sites in borough/district for safeguarding District or Site District or Site Site Name Address Operator Site Name Address Operator Borough Reference Borough Reference Barlestone STW, Orton on the Hill Twycross Lane, Orton on Severn Trent Hinckley -
Extension of Sand and Gravel Working and Progressive Restoration to Agriculture, Grassland and a Pond
155 Agenda Item 11 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL AND REGULATORY BOARD 24th May 2018 REPORT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE COUNTY MATTER PART A – SUMMARY REPORT APP.NO. & DATE: 2017/0902/04 (2017/CM/0257/LCC) – 31st August 2017 PROPOSAL: Extension of sand and gravel working and progressive restoration to agriculture, grassland and a pond LOCATION: Land north of Brascote Lane, Cadeby Quarry, Cadeby APPLICANT: Tarmac Trading Ltd MAIN ISSUES: Restoration, visual impact and impact on private water supplies. RECOMMENDATION: PERMIT subject to conditions as set out in Appendix A to the main report. Circulation Under Local Issues Alert Procedure Mr. I. D. Ould, CC Mr B. Crooks, CC Officer to Contact Amelia Lees (Tel. No. 0116 305 7326) Email: [email protected] 156 PART B – MAIN REPORT Planning History 1. Cadeby Quarry is an established sand and gravel quarry situated between the villages of Cadeby and Newbold Verdon. Sand and gravel extraction has been ongoing at the site since 1964 under a number of planning permissions. In 1973 permission was granted for sand and gravel extraction from an area known as Becks Farm, north of Bosworth Road (permission no. 1973/4727/04). This area was worked in the 1970s and has been restored to lower level agricultural land. In 1988 a further permission was granted for sand and gravel extraction to the north of the Becks Farm area. 2. In August 2005, a substantial mineral permission was granted (planning application reference 2005/0893/04). This enabled sand and gravel extraction from three additional areas: the Northern Working Area (near Newbold Verdon), the Western Working Area (adjacent to the A447 east of Cadeby) and the site of the former Brascote House (a derelict farm building). -
Leicestershire.. Market Bosworth
DIRECTORY.] LEICESTERSHIRE.. MARKET BOSWORTH. 749 tion, archdeaconry 01 Leicester and diocese of Peterborough. IPierrepont Hon. Evelyn H. Higham grange, Hinckley The Ashby-de-Ia-Zouch canal passes about a mile to the west. Richards Col. S. Smith Crosland, Burbage ho. near Hinckley The town 18 lighted with gas by a Company,formed in 1874-5. Scott Charles Norman Lindsay ToUemache esq. Bosworth The water 8upply is obtained from springs and wells. The park, Hinckley church of St. Peter is a building of stone, in the late Gothic Stephen Oscar Leslie esq. Stuart ho. Cadogan sq. London sw style of the 17th century, consisting of spacious chancel, Titley Rev. Richard M.A. Rectory, Barwell, Hinckley nave, aisles, south porch and an embattled tower, with lofty Watson Rev. Canon Henry Lacon M.A. Sharnford rectory, spire, containing a clock and 5 bells: the church was re- Hinckley paired and restored in 1859, and contains a fine font: there Wollaston Frederick Eustace Arbuthnott esq. D.L. Shenton are two monuments to Sir Willoughby Wolstan Dixie bart. d. hall, N uueaton 1827, and his son, Sir W. W. Dixie bart. d. 23 June 1850 and Worsley-Worswick Col. Richard, Normanton hall, Hinckley Lady Olive Dixie, and to the Rev. John Dixie, a former Clerk to the Magistrates, S. Pilgrim, Castle st. Hinckley rector, erected in 1719: there is a stained window in the Special & Petty Sessional Courts are held every alternate south aisle, inserted in 1855, and the west window as well thursday at the Police court, Hinckley, 11 a.m. & every as eight smaller windows in the clerestory are also stained: alternate wednesday at the Dixie Arms inn, Market Bos- the communion plate dates from the 18th century: the worth, 12 noon church affords 400 sittings. -
University of Southampton Research Repository Eprints Soton
University of Southampton Research Repository ePrints Soton Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", University of Southampton, name of the University School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination http://eprints.soton.ac.uk i UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF HUMANITIES School of History The Wydeviles 1066-1503 A Re-assessment by Lynda J. Pidgeon Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 15 December 2011 ii iii ABSTRACT Who were the Wydeviles? The family arrived with the Conqueror in 1066. As followers in the Conqueror’s army the Wydeviles rose through service with the Mowbray family. If we accept the definition given by Crouch and Turner for a brief period of time the Wydeviles qualified as barons in the twelfth century. This position was not maintained. By the thirteenth century the family had split into two distinct branches. The senior line settled in Yorkshire while the junior branch settled in Northamptonshire. The junior branch of the family gradually rose to prominence in the county through service as escheator, sheriff and knight of the shire. -
Launde Priory 1
21 MAY 2018 LAUNDE PRIORY 1 actswilliam2henry1.wordpress.com Release date Version notes Who Current version: H1-Launde-2018-1 21/5/2018 Original version DXC Previous versions: — — — — This text is made available through the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivs License; additional terms may apply Authors for attribution statement: Charters of William II and Henry I Project David X Carpenter, Faculty of History, University of Oxford LAUNDE PRIORY Augustinian priory of St John the Baptist County of Leicestershire : Diocese of Lincoln Founded 1121 × c. 1125 Launde priory was one of the early Augustinian houses in England, established 1120 × c. 1125. According to a narrative concerning the early years of Holy Trinity priory in Aldgate, London, known only from fifteenth-century manuscripts, Bernard prior of Dunstaple, John prior of Launde (Landa), Geoffrey de Clinton, the (king’s) chamberlain (Gaufridus camerarius de Clinton), and others named, witnessed the gift of the Cnihtengild in London to Holy Trinity in that year. It is unsurprising that the priors of two recently founded Augustinian houses should witness a gift to Holy Trinity, thought to be the first Augustinian house in England. Their names were presumably taken from a contemporary deed or other record which has not been preserved (Hodgett, Cartulary of Holy Trinity, 168, no. 871; R. R. Sharpe, Calendar of Letter Books, C, 220). The king’s confirmation of the gift, 000, Regesta 1467, also witnessed by Geoffrey de Clinton, is apparently authentic and datable 1123 × 1127, so the narrative’s date of 1125 may well be accurate. Launde priory was founded at Loddington, ‘in cuius territorio abbatia fundata est’, according to Henry II’s general confirmation of 1155 × 1158 (H2/1456). -
The Bretons and Normans of England 1066-1154: the Family, the Fief and the Feudal Monarchy*
© K.S.B. Keats-Rohan 1991. Published Nottingham Mediaeval Studies 36 (1992), 42-78 The Bretons and Normans of England 1066-1154: the family, the fief and the feudal monarchy* In memoriam R.H.C.Davis 1. The Problem (i) the non-Norman Conquest Of all the available studies of the Norman Conquest none has been more than tangentially concerned with the fact, acknowledged by all, that the regional origin of those who participated in or benefited from that conquest was not exclusively Norman. The non-Norman element has generally been regarded as too small to warrant more than isolated comment. No more than a handful of Angevins and Poitevins remained to hold land in England from the new English king; only slightly greater was the number of Flemish mercenaries, while the presence of Germans and Danes can be counted in ones and twos. More striking is the existence of the fief of the count of Boulogne in eastern England. But it is the size of the Breton contingent that is generally agreed to be the most significant. Stenton devoted several illuminating pages of his English Feudalism to the Bretons, suggesting for them an importance which he was uncertain how to define.1 To be sure, isolated studies of these minority groups have appeared, such as that of George Beech on the Poitevins, or those of J.H.Round and more recently Michael Jones on the Bretons.2 But, invaluable as such studies undoubtedly are, they tend to achieve no more for their subjects than the status of feudal curiosities, because they detach their subjects from the wider question of just what was the nature of the post-1066 ruling class of which they formed an integral part.