Concurrent Monitoring Report - 3

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP AP INTEGRATED IRRIGATION AGRICULTURE TRANSFORMATION PROJECT 3333 (A P I I A T P)

2020

ii CTRAN C O N S U L T I N G L TD. J U N E 2020 F IANL

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Executive summary ...... 1 Results Framework ...... 6 Chapter -1 ...... 13 About the APIIAT Project– Coverage ...... 13 1.1 Introduction ...... 13 1.2 Geographical Coverage ...... 13 1.3 Project Beneficiary ...... 14 1.4. Methodology ...... 14 Chapter 2 ...... 16 Institutional Strengthening & Capacity Building of WUAs ...... 16 2.1: Introduction ...... 16 2.2 Total Tanks and WUAs: ...... 16 2.3 Formation of New WUAs & Re-delineation of WUAs: ...... 17 2.4 Institutional Aspects in tanks with below 100 acres ayacut area:...... 17 2.5 WUA Sub Committees:...... 18 2.6 Capacity Building of WUAs: ...... 19 2.7 WUA Office Infrastructure: ...... 20 2.8 WUA Records and Maintenance: ...... 22 2.9 Para-workers: ...... 23 2.10 Social Audit and Public Disclosure: ...... 24 2.11 Water Tax & Corpus Collection: ...... 24 2.12 Support Organizations: ...... 25 2.13 WUA Self-Rating ...... 26 2.14 Tank development plans & Casecade development plans ...... 27 2.15 Analysis of WUA Data ...... 28 2.16 Ayacutdars: ...... 29 2.17 Tank Uses and Users: ...... 29 2.18 Presence of Lascar and Neeruganti: ...... 29 2.19 Irrigation to Tail End Farmers: ...... 30 2.20 Drought & Shortfall years: ...... 32 2.21 Assessment and Allocation of Water: ...... 33 2.22 Crop planning before the season: ...... 34 2.23 Water schedule and release: ...... 35 2.24 Mode of water distribution: ...... 36 iii

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

2.25 Meetings: ...... 38 2.26 Others: ...... 38 2.27 Key observations& Suggestions: ...... 38 Chapter -3 ...... 40 Rehabilitation & Modernization of SSCBI systems ...... 40 3.1 Introduction: ...... 40 3.1 Detailed Project reports (DPR) ...... 40 3.2 Tendering and grounding of works ...... 40 3.3 Cumulative Expenditure: A critical analysis ...... 41 3.4 Physical Progress: A Critical analysis ...... 42 3.5 Calling of Fresh Tenders ...... 43 3.6 Works Completed ...... 44 3.7 Tracking of work wise physical and financial progress ...... 46 3.8 Extension of Time (EoT) ...... 46 3.9 Cancellation of works ...... 47 3.10 Conclusion ...... 48 Chapter.4 ...... 49 Improving Water Productivity and Efficiency ...... 49 4.1 Introduction: ...... 49 4.2 State Level PGM Activity Implementation Progress: ...... 49 4.3 Drilling of Piezometer Progress at District Levels: ...... 50 4.4 The Progress in Water Sharing among Farmers at District Levels: ...... 51 4.5 Training/ Awareness programs for PGM Groups: ...... 52 4.6 Observations / Suggestions ...... 53 Chapter.5 ...... 54 Climate Smart Crop Production and Diversification ...... 54 5.1.Introduction ...... 54 5.2 Household Survey And Status of Indicators of Project Development Objectives...... 54 5.3 Productivity of specific crops: ...... 55 5.4 Rabi cropped area in tank ayacut in project villages: ...... 57 5.5. Work Progress Under Agriculture Sector ...... 60 5.6 Formation of FPOs and providing services through FPOs in tank villages of 5 districts: ...... 61 5.7 Support to FPOs ...... 61 iv

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

5.8 Promoting farm mechanization & Infrastructure support through FPOs ..... 62 5.9. Work progress under horticulture sector ...... 63 5.10 Suggestions and Recommendations ...... 66 Chapter.6 ...... 68 Climate Smart Aquaculture Production ...... 68 6.1 Introduction ...... 68 6.2 Civil works: ...... 68 6.5 Creating infrastructure facilities: ...... 69 6.6 Capacity Building: ...... 69 Chapter.7 ...... 70 Post-Harvest Management, Market And Agri Business Promotion ...... 70 7.1 Introduction ...... 70 7.2 Implementation Status of Agribusiness Activities ...... 70 Chapter -8 ...... 76 Project Management and Capacity Building ...... 76 8.1 Establishment of Project Management Unit/s: ...... 76 8.2. Trainings ...... 77 Chapter -9 ...... 78 Socio-Economic Profile of sample households ...... 78 9.0 Introduction ...... 78 9.1 Selected Sample Farmers in the Study Area ...... 78 9.3 Classification of Household According to Social categories ...... 79 9.4 Demographics of the Households ...... 79 9.5 Employment status of sample respondents and household members ...... 82 9.6 Asset Possession of Households ...... 83 9.7 Possession of agriculture assets ...... 84 9.8 Possession of milch animals ...... 84 9.9 Household income ...... 85 9.10 Consumption pattern (Expenditure) ...... 85 9.11 Borrowings ...... 86

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

List of Annexures

1.1 Tanks covered and Field visit schedule - Districts - investigators team and Subject specialist team field visit for 60 tanks

2.1 Ayacutdars District wise

2.2 Various Uses of Tanks and Number of Users

2.3 Water to Tail End farmers - District wise

2.4 Number of Shortfalls in Last Five Years - Control Vs Project tanks comparison- District wise

2.5 Assessment and Allocation of Water Before Season – Control Vs Project tanks comparison – District wise

2.6 Crop Planning Before Season – Control Vs Project comparison- District wise

2.7 Water Scheduling and Release – Control Vs Project tanks comparison - District Wise

2.8 Mode of Water Distribution – Control Vs Project tanks comparison - District wise

3 District wise wise progress of 12 districts in sheets

5.1 District wise & component wise target and allocation for 2020-21

5.2 Action plan for 2020-21

9.1 Beneficiary status

9.2 Household size wise (No of Acres), Household size wise (No of Acres) – percentage(%) 9.3 Caste wise Details

9.4 Type of house/shelter

9.6A Agriculture implements – District wise

9.6B Agriculture implements – District wise

9.7 Milch Animals

9.8 Household Income

9.9 Househod consumption pattern

9.10 Household Borrowing sources – District wise

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Abbreviations Used

AAP Annual Action Plan ANGRAU Acharya NG Ranga Agriculture University APDs Assistant Project Director APIIATP Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project CAS Crop Adoption Survey CB Capacity Building CDP Cascade Development Plans CHC Custom Hiring Centre CIGs Common Interest Group CMSS Community Managed Seed System CWB Crop Water Budgeting DPD District Project Director DPMU District Project Management Unit DPR Detailed PROJECT report DPUs District Project Unit FGDs Focus Group Discussions FPO Farmers Producer Organization ICM Intensive Crop Management ICRISAT International Crop Research in Semi-arid Tropics INM Integrated Nutrient Management INM Integrated Nutrition Management IPM Integrated Pest Management JDAs Joint Director of Agriculture LBT. Longitudinal Benefit Tracking MARKFED Marketing Federation MC Managing Committees NABARD National Bank for Agricultural Rural Development NGO Nan Governmental Organization PGM Participatory Groundwater Management PHM Participatory Hydrogeological Monitoring PIP Project Implementation Plan PMU Project Management Unit PRA Participatory Rural Appraisal QCS Quality Control System RFPs Reply For Proposal SAB Social Audit Boards SERP Society for Elimination of Rural Poverty SO Support Organisation SPMU State Project Management Unit SSCBI Small Scale Community Based Irrigation TACs Technical Advisory Committee TDP Tank Development Planning TRPs Training Resource Persons WSF Water Soluble Fertilizers WUA Water User Association

vii

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Executive summary The Development Objective of the project is “to enhance agricultural productivity, profitability and resilience to climate variability in selected tank systems of Andhra Pradesh”. The project intends to realize the development objective through four components, i.e., (a) component A: improving irrigated agriculture efficiency, (b) component B: promoting climate smart agriculture practices, (c) component C: post-harvest management, market and agribusiness promotion, and (d) project management and capacity building. Sub-components of the project are;

Component A: Improving irrigated agriculture efficiency: A.1: Institutional Strengthening and Capacity Building of WUAs; A.2: Rehabilitation and Modernization of the SSCBI systems; A.3: Improving Water Productivity and Efficiency;

Component B: Promoting climate smart agriculture practices B.1: Climate Smart Crop Production and Diversification; B.2: Climate Smart Aquaculture Production.

Component C: Post-harvest Management, Market and Agribusiness Promotion Component D: Project Management and Capacity Building.

Component A-1

Water User Associations are the base for the execution of certain project framed activities. There is a need to mobilize its members to participate in the implementation of project activities such as tank system development, joint azmoish for water tax finalization and collection, auditing of WUA books, corpus mobilization and finally assuming responsibility for O&M of tanks. Supported by a para worker and facilitated by the Support Organization, WUA will motivate all tank system stakeholders to take advantage of all sectoral activities, such as, efficient water use, crop-water budgeting, water sharing, climate resilient Agriculture, Horticulture, Fisheries, and Agri-business. The key objective of the component is to enable Water Users for taking over the primary responsibilities such as tank system improvement and its management, implementation of sectoral activities with community participation.

Across the 12 districts total of 651 tanks got approval in three spells (TAC1, TAC2, TAC3). Out of total tanks, the WUAs’ and MCs’ status is as follows.

Independent tanks Cascade tanks 322 329 Having No Having No MCs <100 >100 Having No Having No WUAs WUAs MCs acres acres WUAs MCs MCs WUAs

298 24 278 20 155 174 147 27 124 23

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

The CTRAN team collected data across 60 tanks, i.e 48 project tanks among that 24 are LBT and 12 control tanks. The performance has been assessed on various parameters. The details are as follows.

The sub-committees have been formed across 56 percent of the sample tanks. The training programmes have been organised at district and tank level to Paraworkers and WUA members respectively. For WUA offices, 35 sites have been identified across 12 districts and 9 estimations were submitted. Across the project districts, the approval of estimations is yet to be done due to various reasons. The WUAs are maintaining books in the range of 9 -4 books per WUA. East Godavari remains in a better position in this activity. In 57% of the sample tanks, social audit boards are displayed. Kadapa, Krishna West Godavari and Vijayanagaram remain at the bottom. The progress is apparent in remaining districts and which was not the case during the last reporting period. In all the districts the extension for SOs has been given, whereas in Chittoor and West Godavari the SO services are ceased. The WUA self-rating has been done in all sample tanks. The SOs are helping WUAs in self rating exercise. Among 48 tanks, 6% tanks have got A Grade, 81% in the bracket of B and the rest 14 are in C Grade.

The socio-economic survey has been done to assess the sample farmers across the project districts. Total 875 sample HHs has been contacted in 59 tanks (i.e 15 LBT, 14 Sample and 12 control) across 12 districts, one sample tank was not covered due to heavy rain in Ongole and restrictions due to pandemic code. To assess the family socio-economic conditions various parameters like, age, family size, sex ratio, occupation, landholding, housing, education, household items, income etc., have been considered and the findings were presented. The details are given in the Annexure 1.

Component A-2

Concurrent monitoring findings given broadly in various sections viz. (a) detailed project report, (b) tendering and grounding of works, (c)cumulative expenditure: a critical analysis, (d)physical progress: a critical analysis, (e) calling of fresh tenders, (f) works completed, (g) tracking of work wise physical and financial progress, (i) extension of time, (j)cancellation of works, (k)actions to be taken and (l) conclusion.

The three works are completed in Prakasham and one each in Anantapuram, East Godavari, Kurnool and Nellore. Total 7 works are completed. Out of total cost of32672.97 lakhs of all works as per agreements, the cumulative expenditure incurred under the A-2 component till end of June 2020 is Rs. 6446.60 lakhs that comes to 19.73 %.

Actions to be taken suggested in this concurrent monitoring report are; (a)critical review for each work to assess the possibility of the work being completed by the contractor within the 1st EOT, (b)finding a prudent solution the problem arising out of sand policy posed by the DPUs(c)obtaining application from contractors for EoT and getting it scrutinized by the competent authority at the earliest, (d)processing for cancellation of few works awarded to contractor where the work is not progressing in last 9 months and if the DPU is convinced that work will not be resumed even after grant of EOT, (e)revision of DPRs wherever necessary before initiating tendering process, (f)

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

calling of tenders, (g) preparation of DPR for those tanks for which DPRs are not prepared, (h) giving priority to construction of Cut-throat flumes.

Component A-3

This component is an integral part of the overall implementation and different PGM groups have been formed in the project locations or process is initiated to strength the existing ones. so far 419 PGM groups have been formed. The piezometers drilling site identification has been completed for 377 tanks.. Drilling of piezometers site permissions and granting is in progress from Head office. Till now 198 permissions have been granted from head office for each district. Across the state 419 PGM groups have already been formed in the tank levels. In 108 tanks trainings have been completed These PGM groups are more in Kadapa, Nellore, Srikakulam, Vijayanagaram and Krishnadistricts, and less in Kurnool, Chittoor, East and West Godavari districts. Component B-1 The current household survey captures the data pertaining to previous rabi season (rabi season of 2019) and covers only ayacut farmers. However, the household data is analysed to study the status of ‘PDO-Indicators (specified crop yield)’ in achieving the project development objectives and also the intermediate result indicators (acreage under specified crops) as mentioned in the result framework.

The work progress in the agriculture sector for the current reporting period is limited to the preparation of the state action plan for the financial year 2020-21 and formally approved at Agri. Commissionerate level. The new interventions proposed and interventions to be taken up in the financial year 2020-21 are;

i. Formation of FPOs and providing services through FPOs in tank villages of 5 districts with 100%bproject support:The MANAGE is already on board as ABSO for conducting the supply and value chain analysis, market intelligence and will suggest business plan for FPOs. ii. Demonstrating &Promoting Integrated Farming Systems (IFS) through FPOs:Area specific, suitable IFS models will be arrived with the technical guidance of ICAR/KVK and SAU’s. iii. Promoting farm mechanization & Infrastructure support through FPOs: FPOs will be provided with post-harvest and production infrastructure for ease of production and efficient handling of produce and profitable marketing.Primary processing-cleaning and dehulling equipment, establishment of Custom Hiring Centres, supply of water carrying pipes and water lifting devices. iii. Support to District Resource Centres (DRCs):Support infrastructure &technical support for setting up of District Resource Centres (DRCs) in the 5 project districts. iv. Capacity building for farmers, FPOs and Extension Staff (VAAs/VHAs/VSAs)

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

houses; (c) rejuvenation of old mango and sweet orange orchards (137.33 Ha.); (d) canopy management (in 291.01 Ha.); (e) promotion of water soluble fertiliser (127.16 Ha.), (f) ICM and INM in horticultural crops (891.72 Ha.), (g) creation of permanent pandals (26.34 Ha.); and (h) capacity building of Staff / officials and farmers.

Department of Horticulture has also prepared action plan for the financial year 2020-21 under APIIATP.The productivity enhancement activities and quality enhancement activities now onwards will be organized under the supervision of newly established RhytuBharosaKendras (RBKs) in the selected village of the project area. As per the action plan 2020-21, It is proposed to take up area expansion under banana (34.59 Ha) and cocoa (17.47Ha). Canopy management is proposed in 309.69 Ha. Further, it is proposed to promote 4 units of shade net houses and promoting water soluble fertilizers to the extent in 541.45 Ha in the project area.Keeping in view the importance of ICM/INM practices, 1343.35Ha is targeted to promote the same.Realizing the benefit of vegetable cultivation with the help of permanent pandals, 28.5 Ha area is proposed to be brought under this system in the year 2020-21. For the enhancement of fruit quality, fruit covering will be promoted for mango (in 400Ha), guava (in 220Ha), pomegranate (in 215Ha). Besides, quality improvement of banana in175 Ha and promoting fruit harvesting with the help of fruit pickers is also proposed in 110Ha. Required training and capacity building programmes will be organised in the knowledge center of RBKs.Beneficiary selection for all the horticulture interventions is under progress.

Component- B2

The under this component, activities are in planning phase. The detailed planning has been done on various activities and budget estimations are also done for the following activities.

 Administration approvals were given for the establishment of one Fresh water fish Brood bank in 3 districts and for construction of 37 captive seed nurseries in four districts.  The Dept. of Fisheries has furnished proposal for establishment of 7 fish retail outlets.  The administrative approval was given ot aqua labs, ice plant in vijayanagarm and Nellore districts respectively  Orientation training programmes have been gornsied in 7 dsitricts Component -C

The Agri business Support Organisation (ABSO) Contract Awarded to Director General, National Institute of Agriculture Extension Management (MANAGE) for supply and value chain analysis, providing market intelligence and Export direct linkages with FPOs.As per the initial assessment, there are 177 FPOs existing in the area of 228 tanks, out of 651 project tanks. In the year 2020- 21, it is proposed to further strengthen 41 FPOs in 10 districts at a cost of 212 Lakhs. As of now, 15 FPOs were identified for further strengthening by the department of Horticulture. During the current assessment period, capacity building training and exposure visits were organised for FPOs where 525 farmers of 15 existing FPOs on post-harvest management, market and agribusiness promotion and conducted exposure visits to get the remunerative price to farmers at state level and District level.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

As far as infrastructure is concerned, administrative approval has been accorded to 8 godowns and design and estimate of 4 units are under scrutiny. Construction of one low cost onion storage structure in Kurnool district and one turmeric storage structure in Visakhapatnam districthave been completed.However, utilization of these storage structures by farmers is about to initiate. Rural market facility through FPO is in completion stage in Vizianagaram district.Further, two transport vehicles, one for mango transportation purpose to a FPO in Vizianagaram district and the one to a FPO in Visakhapatnam districtfor transportation of coconuts have been provided.

Two Cashew processing unit’s construction is under progress through two different FPOs in West Godavari district. These two units are expected to benefit more than 2000 farmers under 13 tanks.

Regarding supply of secondary processing units to FPO farmers, 32 potential WUAs were identified, orientation training was provided, specification of units finalized by agriculture department. All the JDAs in the state have identified the targeted villages to procure and operate the secondary processing units on custom hiring basis. Procurement method DBT is under examination and finalization of empanelment of suppliers of these machinery is pending with Department of Agriculture.Across the project districts, 32 Common / Farmer Interest Groups (CIGs /FIGs) have been identified for taking up feasible secondary processing units.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Results Framework

PDO Indicators by Objectives / Outcomes

Farmers reached with agricultural assets or services

IN00707892

►Farmers reached with agricultural assets or services (Number, Corporate)

Baseline Actual (Previous) Actual (Current) End Target

Value 0.00 18260.00 23819.00 200,000.00

Date 19-Mar-2018 30-Dec-2019 30-June-2020 31-Oct-2025

The Project is at preparatory stage and execution of works at the tank level is yet to commence. Measurement of Indicators will be taken up only after work is executed. PDO level indicators to be mapped during midterm and end-line assessment. After the intervention, it will be reported

Farmers reached with agricultural assets or services - Female (Number, Corporate Supplement) Baseline Actual (Previous) Actual (Current) End Target

Value 0.00 2764.00 4200.00 50,000.00

Productivity of specific crops increased

IN00707891

►Productivity of specific crops increased (Metric ton, Custom)

Baseline Actual (Previous) Actual (Current) End Target

Value 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

30-Dec-2019 30-June-2020 Date 19-Mar-2018 31-Oct-2025 Kharif Rabi

This indicator measures the increased crop productivity for paddy, red gram1, groundnut and chili crops at Comments: farm level in metric ton per hectare.

Note: Yield data mentioned under ‘Actual (previous) refers to the crop yields obtained in previous season ie., Kharif 2019, captured in Dec 2019 house-hold survey. Yield data mentioned under ‘Actual (Current) refers to the crop yields obtained in previous season ie rabi 2019, captured in June 2020 house-hold survey.

Chilli crop is commercially grown for marketing as dry-red chilli. This crop is sown in August-September months and harvested between February-March months. Only single crop as commercial crop is taken in a year. Hence, the yield of red chilli can be captured during the HH survey conducted and reported by the end of June month of every year. Hence, chilli yield is reported in the concurrent monitoring report

1 In the tank command araea no red gram crops cultivated.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

pertaining to January - June (reported in 30-June-2020).

a. Paddy (Metric ton/ha, Custom Supplement)

Baseline Actual (Previous) Actual (Current) End Target 5.90 6.09 Value 5.00 5.50 Kharif 2019 Rabi 2019

b. Groundnut (Metric ton, Custom Supplement)

Baseline Actual (Previous) Actual (Current) End Target 1.10 2.00 Value 1.14 1.43 Kharif2019 Rabi 2019

c. Chilli (Metric ton/ha, Custom Supplement)

Baseline Actual (Previous) Actual (Current) End Target 2.12 4.09 Value 2.37 2.96 Not applicable 2019

Farmer’s household income increased

IN00707893

►Farmer's income increased (Text, Custom)

Baseline Actual (Previous) Actual (Current) End Target

Value INR 15,722.00 18,555.00 16464.00 INR 19,653.00

Date 19-Mar-2018 30-Dec-2019 30-June-2020 31-Oct-2025

This indicator will track the annual farm income of project beneficiaries. It measures how the income of the Comments: farmers evolves with project activities, compared to the income of farmers that do not benefit from project interventions (Household income increases in INR).

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Water Productivity Increased (kg/m3)

IN00707894

►Water Productivity Increased (Kg/m3) (Text, Custom)

Baseline Actual (Previous) Actual (Current) End Target

as given for each crop in as given for each crop (as given for each Value (as given for each crop) baseline value in baseline value crop)

Date 19-Mar-2018 30-Dec-2019 30-June-2020 31-Oct-2025

This indicator will measure the annual increase in water productivity at tank command areas; it is Comments: expressed ratio of agriculture production in Kg over water consumed (in m3).

The project has taken up rehabilitation and modernisation of SSCBI system. In the first phase, rehabilitation and modernisation of 346 tanks have been taken up. As works are in progress, baseline situation still prevails. Secondly, as first cropping cycle will be taken up during 2019,.water productivity assessment will be done only after completion of tank rehabilitation and end of cropping season.

a. Paddy (Surface water) (Text, Custom Breakdown) Baseline Actual (Previous) Actual (Current) End Target

Value 0.33 kg/m3 0.33 kg/m3 0.33 kg/m3 0.42 kg/m3

Date 19-Mar-2018 30-Dec-2019 30-June-2020 31-Oct-2025

b. Paddy (Surface + Groundwater) (Text, Custom Supplement) Baseline Actual (Previous) Actual (Current) End Target

Value 0.37 kg/m3 0.37 kg/m3 0.37 kg/m3 0.50 kg/m3

IN00707901

c. Groundnut (Surface + Groundwater) (Text, Custom Supplement) Baseline Actual (Previous) Actual (Current) End Target

Value 0.28 kg/m3 0.28 kg/m3 0.28 kg/m3 0.35 kg/m3

IN00707902

d. Chilli (Surface + Groundwater) (Text, Custom Supplement) Baseline Actual (Previous) Actual (Current) End Target

Value 0.30 kg/m3 0.30 kg/m3 0.32 kg/m3 0.38 kg/m3

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Intermediate Results Indicators by Components

Component A: Improving Irrigated Agriculture Efficiency

IN00707904

►Satisfaction rate related to WUAs performance (Percentage, Custom)

Baseline Actual (Previous) Actual (Current) End Target

Value 17.00 48.23 52.55 70.00

Date 19-Mar-2018 30-Dec-2019 30-June-2020 31-Oct-2025

This indicator will measure the satisfaction rate related to WUAs performance, due to project intervention. Comments: This will be measured annually after the mid-term of the project.

Activities are planned to be implemented through WUA but as project is in inception stage, associated of WUA is very limited. Further, to strengthen WUAs, project planned measures are yet to be executed. Hence, WUA satisfaction rating can only be done once involvement of WUA come as to a stage and major part of the planned activities are executed.

IN00707907

►Area provided with new/improved irrigation or drainage services (Hectare (Ha), Corporate)

Baseline Actual (Previous) Actual (Current) End Target

Value 0.00 0.00 0.00 75,908.00

Date 19-Mar-2018 30-Dec-2019 30-June-2020 31-Oct-2025

This indicator measures the total area of land provided with irrigation and drainage services under the Comments: project, including in (i) the area provided with new irrigation and drainage services, and (ii) the area provided with improved irrigation and drainage services, expressed in hectare (ha).

IN00707912

Area provided with new irrigation or drainage services (Hectare(Ha), Corporate Breakdown) Baseline Actual (Previous) Actual (Current) End Target

Value 0.00 0.00 0.00 90,000.00

Date 19-Mar-2018 30-Dec-2019 30-June-2020 31-Oct-2025

The project has taken up rehabilitation and modernisation of SSCBI system. In the first phase, rehabilitation and modernisation of 346 tanks have been taken up. As works are in progress, irrigation coverage remains same to that of basel8ine situation. Once works are completed, gap ayacut is expected to get reduced and designed ayacut will be covered under irrigation..

N00707915

Area provided with improved irrigation or drainage services (Hectare(Ha), Corporate Breakdown) Baseline Actual (Previous) Actual (Current) End Target

Value 46,000 46,000.00 48,689.00 90,000.00

Date 19-Mar-002018 30-Dec-2019 30-June-2020 31-Oct-2025

The project has taken up rehabilitation and modernisation of SSCBI system. In the first phase, rehabilitation and modernisation of 346 tanks have been taken up. As works are in progress, irrigation coverage remains same to that of baseline situation. Once works are completed, gap ayacut is expected to get reduced and designed ayacut will be covered under irrigation.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Component B: Promoting Climate Smart Agriculture Practices

IN00707903

►Area increased/decreased in the Tank Command under Paddy, Pulses, Oil seeds and Vegetables (Hectare(Ha), Custom)

Baseline Actual (Previous) Actual (Current) End Target

Value 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Date 19-Mar-2018 30-Dec-2019 30-June-2020 31-Oct-2025

This indicator will measure the area increased/decreased (Hectare) in the Tank Command under paddy, red Comments: gram, groundnut and chilies, measured separately for individual crops (in Metric ton / Hectare).

Note: Acreage data mentioned under ‘Actual (previous)’ refers to the crop acreage pertaining to previous season ie., Kharif 2019, captured in Dec 2019 house-hold survey. Yield data mentioned under ‘Actual (Current) refers to the crop yields obtained in previous season ie rabi 2019, captured in June 2020 house-hold survey.

Chilli crop is commercially grown for marketing as dry-red chilli. This crop is sown in August-September months and harvested between February- March months. Only single crop as commercial crop is taken in a year. Hence, the acreage of red chilli can be captured during the HH survey conducted and reported by the end of June month of every year. Hence, chilli acreage is reported in the concurrent monitoring report pertaining to January - June (reported in 30-June-2020 report).

*Data mentioned under Actual (Current)below is the data obtained during the house-hold survey from 48 tanks, that includes 24 sample tanks and 24 LBT tanks.

a. Paddy (Hectare(Ha), Custom Breakdown) Baseline Actual (Previous) Actual (Current) End Target

Value 95,908.00 95,908.00 96459.02* 75,908.00

Date 19-Mar-2018 30-Dec-2019 30-June-2020 31-Oct-2025

IN00707910 b. Red Gram (Hectare(Ha), Custom Breakdown) Baseline Actual (Previous) Actual (Current) End Target 2,059.98* Value 2,052.00 2,052.00 5,552.00

Date 19-Mar-2018 30-Dec-2019 30-June-2020 31-Oct-2025

IN00707914

c. Groundnut (Hectare(Ha), Custom Breakdown) Baseline Actual (Previous) Actual (Current) End Target

Value 4,982.00 4,982.00 4,987.30* 8,482.00

Date 19-Mar-2018 30-Dec-2019 30-June-2020 31-Oct-2025

IN00707917

d. Chilli (Hectare(Ha), Custom Breakdown) Baseline Actual (Previous) Actual (Current) End Target

Value 627.00 687.00 690.3* 4,777.00

Date 19-Mar-2018 30-Dec-2019 30-June-2020 31-Oct-2025

*Area increased indicating sample tanks only

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

IN00707918

►Area under fishery increased (Ha EWSA) at Full Tank Level (Percentage, Custom)

Baseline Actual (Previous) Actual (Current) End Target

Value 33.00 33.00 33.00 41.00

Date 19-Mar-2018 30-Dec-2019 30-June-2020 31-Oct-2025

This indicator will measure net fish cultivation area increased in tank water reservoir areas (Effective Water Comments: Spread Area for fishing) in percentage.

Project support system for aquaculture promotion will commence from 2019 monsoon season. Hence this indicator will be mesured only after the first harvest is completed. After intervention the figures will be indicated, as of now baseline figures will be remain same.

IN00707919

►Increment in Fish Productivity in short seasonal tanks (Tones/year, Custom)

Baseline Actual (Previous) Actual (Current) End Target

Value 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.53

Date 19-Mar-2018 30-Dec-2019 30-June-2020 31-Oct-2025

Comments: This indicator will measure net fish productivity per effective water spread area (tones/year).

Project support system for aquaculture promotion will commence from 2019 monsoon season. Hence this indicator will be mesured only after the first harvest is completed.

Component C: Post-harvest Management, Market and Agribusiness Promotion

IN00707905

►Number of Farmers Having Access to Infrastructural Facilities Created (Number, Custom)

Baseline Actual (Previous) Actual (Current) End Target

Value 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Date 19-Mar-2018 30-Dec-2019 30-June-2020 31-Oct-2025

This indicator will measure the number of farmers having access to post-harvest infrastructural facilities Comments: (Storage Structures and Low Energy Cool Chambers) created under the project.

Agricultural Infrastructural facilities are to be created after detail feasibility assessment. Once such infrastructures are created, based on the assessment, accessibility parameter can be measured. Few storage structures were created in the project area. However, usage of these storage structures by farmers is yet to be initiated.

IN00707909 a. Storage Structures (Number, Custom Breakdown) Baseline Actual (Previous) Actual (Current) End Target Value 0.00 0.00 0 6,000.00

Date 19-Mar-2018 30-Dec-2019 30-June-2020 31-Oct-2025

N00707911 b. Low Energy cool Chambers (Number, Custom Breakdown) Baseline Actual (Previous) Actual (Current) End Target

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Value 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,000.00

07-Jun-2019 30-Dec-2020 31-Oct-2025

IN00707913

►Number of FPO activities financed through business plans (Number, Custom)

Baseline Actual (Previous) Actual (Current) End Target

Value 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00

Date 19-Mar-2018 30-Dec-2019 30-June-2020 31-Oct-2025

This indicator represents number of business plans for FPO activities prepared and supported under the Comments: project (in absolute number) from year 3 onwards.

FPO promotion and strengthening process is at the preliminary stage. It is expected that FPOs will come to a stage to take up business only after they reach to that stage. This indicator can be measured only after FPOs takes up certain business activities, based on their business plan.

IN00707916

►Number of women represented in WUA and FPO (Percentage, Custom)

Baseline Actual (Previous) Actual (Current) End Target

Value 0.00 0.00 20.00 30.00

Date 19-Mar-2018 30-Dec-2019 30-June-2020 31-Oct-2025

This indicator will measure the percentage of women represented in WUAs and FPOs formation, and active Comments: participation in decision making process.

WUA promotion process has been initiated and the process is expected to completed in coming months. Once, the overall process is completed, this indicator will be mapped.

Component D: Project Management and Capacity Building

IN00707906

►Beneficiary (of which 50 percent women) satisfaction rate with quality of services provided by the project (Percentage, Custom) Baseline Actual (Previous) Actual (Current) End Target

Value 0.00 0.00 49.8 80.00

Date 19-Mar-2018 30-Dec-2019 30-June-2020 31-Oct-2025

This indicator measures the percentage of beneficiaries who expressed satisfaction with the quality of Comments: services provided by the project based on formal surveys (of which 50 percent should be women).

Delivery of project framed service has been initiated, specifically capacity building. Beneficiary satisfaction can be mapped only after certain category of inputs are rendered and benefit is occurred / not occurred at the beneficiary level.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Chapter -1 About the APIIAT Project– Coverage

1.1 Introduction

The Project Development Objective is “to enhance agricultural productivity, profitability and resilience to climate variability in selected tank systems of Andhra Pradesh”. The components of the projects are

Component A has three sub-components:

A.1: Institutional Strengthening and Capacity Building of WUAs;

A.2: Rehabilitation and Modernization of the SSCBI systems;

A.3: Improving Water Productivity and Efficiency;

Component B has two sub components

B.1: Climate Smart Crop Production and Diversification; B.2: Climate Smart Aquaculture Production.

Component C: Post-harvest Management, Market and Agribusiness Promotion

Component D: Project Management and Capacity Building

1.2 Geographical Coverage The proposed project will be implemented over a period of 6 years, providing benefits to 0.2million farming families directly covering about 90,000 Ha of agriculture land in 1,200 tank command areas. The project will cover entire state12 districts (except Guntur), in the state with an intensive focus on agricultural development in four north-coastal districts of AP (Srikakulam, Vizianagaram, Visakhapatnam areasofEastGodavari district.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

1.3 Project Beneficiary

The project will have a number of beneficiaries in different categories, i.e., farmers, tenants, fishers etc., based on the scope of the project and framed activities. While, overall selection and involvement of beneficiaries will be based on the existing guidelines of the Government, in order to make the intervention inclusive and result oriented.

1.4. Methodology

The project covers several aspects: Institutional Strengthening and Capacity Building of Water Users Associations to manage the tank systems and groundwater sources, and to improve land and water productivity through promotion of sustainable agriculture. Taking the multi-disciplinary nature of the project into account, tools of different disciplines have been developed for data collection and for assessment of the project interventions. Thus, the external monitoring and evaluation agency comprises a team with multi-disciplinary expertise to avail in its approach to the task. The concurrent monitoring has been conducted by a team of multi-disciplinary experts from relevant disciplines.

To realize the objectives of the assignment and the tasks involved a combination of different data collection methods were used. An important method with socio-anthropological dimensions used is based on a participatory observation and assessment.

1.4.1 Selection of Households and sample

The systematic Random procedure was followed in selecting the householdsinthe project and control tanks. Accordingly, 15 households were randomly selected from each of the selected 48 project and 12 control tanks. Thus, a total of 875 households were selected from project tanks and 190Control households, 356 LBT and 327 is sample. Further, from selected households, due care was taken to include the total households in the ratio of 5:5:5 from head, middle and tail end reaches of the ayacut from selected tanks.

As per the M&E design, a sample of 60 tanks wassupposedtobecovered during the half yearly period but the team able to collected data across 59 tanks and 1 tank the collected data has been spoiled due to heavy rain i,e in Praskasham district. The details of the visited tanks have been given in annexure-1

1.4.2 Collection of data

Schedules were prepared for capturing the required information at tank, WUA and household levels for primary and secondary levels of data. The interview schedule was pre-tested in the field before the survey by duly including PMU. For furnishing WUA, Tank Schedules, the data was collected through using transect walks, FGDs, perusal of records and discussions with key informants.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

1.4.3 Method of collection

Minimum one or two members of the external M&E team visited each selected tank and collected data for Tank, WUA schedules through interview method and also verified the relevant records.

1.4.4 Survey Team

Separate 8 teams (32 members) involved for household survey (investigators) for collecting primary data with respect to household schedules.

1.4.5 Limitations

The sample selected for these categories are based on intelligent perceptions of Tank Reach rather than any well-defined demarcation. Clear-cut demarcations of Head, Middle and Tail are not available at tank level as it is under Minor Irrigation.

The control tanks are not exactly similar to project tanks as they are dry / non-functional tanks due to occurrence of drought for several years;

In some places Pucca Revenue/Irrigation Records are not made available for cross verification of field data.

Some farmers are not keen to inform their income and value of their assets while collecting data.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Sub-Component A1

Chapter 2

Institutional Strengthening & Capacity Building of WUAs

2.1: Introduction Water User Associations are the base for the execution of certain project framed activities. They shall mobilize their members to participate in the implementation of project activities such as tank system development, joint azmoish for water tax finalization, collection and auditing of WUA books, corpus mobilization and finally assuming O&M responsibility of tanks. Supported by a paraworker and facilitated by the Support Organization, WUA will motivate all tank system stakeholders to take advantage of all sectoral activities, such as, efficient water use, including crop-water budgeting, water sharing, climate resilient Agriculture, Horticulture, Fisheries, and Agri-business.2

As part of the institutional strengthening process, to assume the responsibility of tank system development and its management by WUAs, systematic enhancement of WUA capacities is crucial. To increase the capacities of WUAs for effective governance and functioning, there are several key instruments designed such as monthly meetings of the WUA managing committee to discuss the activities that are happening around the tank including project measures like climate resilient crop planning, water budgeting, water management etc. The General body meeting once in six months where review of plans, approval of plans, water governance/ management related issues are to be discussed. Besides these, participation in Tank Development Plans (TDP), Cascade Development Plans (CDP), working with fisheries/ farmers’ cooperatives and encouraging women’s participation in the project activities are other instrumental elements towards strengthening WUAs.

PMU has continued capacity building of WUA through training and exposures. Performance assessment of WUAs is also conducted to monitor the progress of WUA in functional and governance aspects. A total of 3201 members of 45 WUAs trained on governance and functional dimensions. Along with WUA, 65 para workers have also been trained. Tank / cascade level workshops (159 nos.) were organized, involving around 12,024 members along with awareness camps on the project, its activities and beneficial dimensions. Identification of a capacity building facilitating agency to build institutional capacity is in process and notification in this regard will be issued shortly.

2.2 Total Tanks and WUAs:

By the end of the reporting period (June 2020), across 12 districts, there are 651 tanks approved under 3 TACs (TAC1, TAC2, TAC3). While 322 are Independent tanks, 329 tanks are under the cascade system; almost 50% is under Independent and cascade tank systems. All the independent tanks have more than 100 acres ayacut. About 47% of the tanks are under cascade system (155

2 Source: APIIATP Project Implementation Plan – Guiding Principles of Institutional Strengthening

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

tanks) have below 100 acres ayacut and the rest 53% of the tanks have above 100 acres ayacut (174 tanks3).

Out of 322 Independent tanks, 298 tanks have WUAs and of these, 278 tanks have Managing Committees (MC) and the rest 20 WUAs do not have MCs. The major reasons for the absence of MCs are the local political environment. Though the members are identified, the MC is not constituted because there was no consensus on who would be the office bearers (President and Vice President). This situation still exists in Kurnool, Prakasham, West Godavari and Vizianagaram Districts.

Out of 174 Cascade tanks, with greater or equal to 100 acres ayacut, 147 tanks have WUAs and of these 124 WUAs have Managing Committees (MC). The reasons for the absence of MC in cascade WUAs are the same as with the committees where Independent Tanks do not constitute MCs.

2.3 Formation of New WUAs & Re-delineation of WUAs: From the data presented above, it is visible that there is a need for the formation of new WUAs. In the cascade system, the tanks that are below 100 ac. ayacut are not part of any WUA system. Formation of new WUAs wherever qualified and bringing in tanks with below 100 ac ayacut into the WUA system could be easier for managing the project and the project interventions would be effective.

The District teams (APDs) know the information about the requirement of Re-Delineation of WUAs/ formation of new WUAs and are ready to be part of the exercises. The process has to be driven at the institutional level with the support of local SO. Further, before the process begins, training may be required for APDs, SO teams and Para workers on re-delineation of WUAs/ formation of new WUAs. Guidelines may be circulated to appoint competent authorities whereever WUAs don’t exist in the tank villages.

2.4 Institutional Aspects in tanks with below 100 acres ayacut area: Out of 651 approved tanks, all independent tanks are having above 100 ac ayacut, and there are about 156 tanks in cascades with less than 100 ac ayacut. The district wise number of such tanks are given in the table no.1. For WUAs having above 100 ac ayacut, the DPU and SO teams work with key ayacut farmers along with the village sarpanch to take the project interventions; the key ayacut farmers are not fixed. And it is also to be noted that there is no mandate to these members to attend the meeting arranged by the project personnel. These members are consulted to take any project related decisions in a meeting arranged in the village.

3 In Krishna District, there are only 10 tanks with greater or equal to 100 ac ayacut in TAC 1, TAC2, TAC3 together, as per Gazette. But, as per DPR 11 tanks are being considered now in APIIATP. Similarly, In Kadapa District, Peddullapally Tank in B.Kodur Mandal ayacut is shown as 16 acres which has actually more than 100 acres ayacut.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Table 2.1: Tanks with <100 Ac. Ayacut District No of tanks with District No of tanks with below 100 ac ayacut below 100 ac ayacut Anantapur 13 Nellore 0 Chittoor 17 Prakasham 15 East Godavari 4 Srikakulam 34 Kadapa 5 Vizianagaram 31 Krishna 4 Visakhapatnam 14 Kurnool 10 West Godavari 9

For effective implementation of the project and to involve communities in the project, it was suggested by the state to form cascade committees/ re-delineation of WUAs wherever necessary, which is yet to be initiated. To take this forward, a training/ orientation program of all stakeholders would be useful where the need for formation of cascade coordination committees, and how to form the committees are explained. The guidelines for the formation of cascade committees would be a helpful document for the district teams.

If any intervention has to be initiated in such tanks, it was reported that in the absence of a cascade committee or any formal committee from a project point of view, the SHG or any other local community-based organization would be consulted/ considered who can take up the activity.

2.5 WUA Sub Committees: The APFMIS act proposes to constitute four sub-committees4 for each of the WUA to ensure the effective tank system improvement and its management with ayacut farmers’ active participation. The sub-committee formation is initiated in some of the project districts whereas in some other districts like Kadapa, Nellore, Prakasham and Vizianagaram districts, it is yet to be initiated. It was noticed that the sub-committees are not formed in a few tanks because of the local issues. These sub-committees, wherever formed, are yet to assume their responsibilities; they are at their infancy stage. A training of sub committees is required to perform their responsibilities. The status of the sub-committee in the project villages visited by M&E teams is as follows.

Table 2.2: Status of Sub-Committees in the Visited Tanks WUA Status Formed Not formed Not Total District (WUA/ Non-WUA Applicable tank) Anantapur WUA 3 1 4 Non-WUA 1 1 Chittoor WUA 3 3 East Godavari WUA 3 1 4 Kadapa Non-WUA 4 4 Krishna WUA 4 4 Kurnool Non-WUA 2 2

4 There are four sub committees namely 1. Works sub-committee 2. Finance and Resources sub-committee 3. Water management sub- committee and 4. Monitoring, Evaluation and Training sub-committee. The act suggests 4 members in each of the sub-committee where the convener of each subcommittee is MC member and the rest are ayacut farmers.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

WUA Status Formed Not formed Not Total District (WUA/ Non-WUA Applicable tank) WUA 2 2 Nellore WUA 4 4 Non-WUA 1 1 Prakasham WUA 3 3 Non-WUA 2 2 Srikakulam WUA 1 1 2 Visakhapatnam WUA 4 4 Vizianagaram WUA 4 4 West Godavari WUA 4 4 Total 24 19 5 48 Percentage 56 44 (%)

2.6 Capacity Building of WUAs:

The Water User Association (WUA) and their Managing and sub-committees are inclusive and are key in project implementation. The capacity building of these stakeholders besides others is crucial. Training of these stakeholders increases the capacity to perform their roles to achieve the project objectives and goals. To achieve this, a capacity building plan for all kinds of stakeholders involved in the project is necessary.

The PMU has suggested certain training themes to DPUs to be delivered at respective Districts. Based on the number of project tanks and their status (whether WUAs have been constituted, MCs are set up…etc.,), the SO and DPUs planned their CB activities for the entire year with Quarterly breakup and these plans got approval from the state. The following are the training programs with target group and duration approved for the year 2019-20 as part of Capacity Building of WUAs.

Table 2.3: Planned Trainings for WUA & Para Workers Sl. Training Program Target Days Level No. group 1 Para worker’s roles and Para 2 District level workers responsibilities 2 Preparation of TDP / CDP WUA 1 Village/ Tank level members 3 Awareness generation on APIIATP WUA 1 Village/ Tank level members activities 4 Roles and Responsibilities of WUA WUA 1 Village/ Tank level members

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

PMU has continued capacity building of WUA through training and exposures. Performance assessment of WUAs was also conducted to monitor the progress of WUA in functional and governance aspects. A total of 3,201 members of 45 WUAs trained on governance and functional dimensions. Along with WUA, 65 para workers have also been trained. Tank / cascade level workshops (159 nos.) were organized, involving around 12,024 members along with awareness camps on the project, its activities and beneficial dimensions. Identification of a Training facilitating agency to build institutional capacity is in the process and notification in this regard will be issued shortly.

2.7 WUA Office Infrastructure: The project has proposed to support WUAs for construction of office buildings in the project villages to perform the WUA responsibilities effectively and to give them institutional identity. As per the guidelines for construction of office buildings and its design communicated to DPUs, the progress of creating Office Infrastructure is as follows in different districts.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Table 2.4: Status of WUA Office Building Number of Number of Number of SN District Locations Estimations Estimations Remarks Identified Submitted Approved

1 Anantapur 3 2 0 State office sought site clearance certificate

2 Chittoor 11 1 0 State office sought site clearance certificate

3 East Godavari 3 2 0 The civil works progress of the district is sought in one case.

As the works are not started and are going for re tendering process in another tank, asked to review the proposal

4 Kadapa 2 1 0

5 Krishna 4 0 0 Estimate was sent back to revisit the costs

6 Kurnool 2 2 0 Sent back to district suggesting a site clearance certificate from MRO

7 Nellore 1 1 0 Tender process to be initiated

8 Prakasham 1 0 0

9 Srikakulam 2 0 0 Estimate was sent back to revisit the costs

10 Vishakhapatnam 3 0 0

11 Vizianagaram 2 0 0

12 West Godavari 2 0 0

Total 35 9 0

The team has been reviewed the estimates submitted by Srikakulam and East Godavari districts. While the East Godavari’s estimate is yet to get approval, the estimate from Srikakulam is sent back to revisit the costs. The following is the summary of 9 tanks where the WUA office related work is initiated. The major issues observed in the process of creating WUA office infrastructure are: 1. No unanimity among MC members on location; 2. The Local political environment has been the obstruction in the way of site finalization; 3. Getting land conversion/ land ownership/ possession certificate from Revenue Department is taking time; 4. Conflict with other infrastructure proposed in the same tank village; 5. Progress halted due to COVID-19 pandemic.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

There is no exclusive office/s noticed either in rented or in its own buildings to perform the WUA activities and to deliver the functions. Whenever there is a need for space for WUA related meetings/ gatherings, the village secretariat is being used.

2.8 WUA Records and Maintenance:

Record maintenance is a crucial and important activity of WUAs. It is a systematic recording of transactions, events, decisions, etc., which ensures transparency and provides answers to many questions at any stage of the project. There are 9 different books recommended by the project, printed centrally and sent to DPUs at District level. The books were distributed during April and May months in the year 2019 by Support Organizations (SO) in the districts and are being maintained. In the Kadapa in sample tanks only minutes books being maintained. Depending on the capability and initiative of SO team members and APDs, there is a variation in a record management from district to district. The overall status of record maintenance is given in the table below.

Table 2.5: Record Maintenance at WUA Level

It is realized that special training is required for record maintenance and documentation for both SO team and para-workers. As part of the para-workers CB activities, training programs conducted

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

on roles and responsibilities, the orientation was given on book keeoing to the para-workers, which the para-workers felt doesn’t equip them enough to write books on their own. They may need hand-holding till the time they write books on their own. There are other books (ex: water flow and canal gauge recording, cash book) for which the training programs may be organized as and when the need arises. In addition to the existing books, the books such as Training register and PGM registers may be required at a WUA level to keep the track of project interventions.

2.9 Para-workers:

To support the WUAs in their functions, a ‘para-worker’ support system is provided under the project. Clear guidelines for identification of para workers are circulated among DPUs. The para worker identification was carried out in two phases till reporting period. Though Non- WUA tanks are not eligible to engage/ hire a paraworker, it was observed in Kadapa district that they were engaged. The paraworkers are supporting SO teams and MCs in communicating project related information to WUA members, records maintenance, mobilizing farmers for meetings and planning exercises. The status of the 48 tanks proposed for the current reporting period is given in the below table.

Table 2.6: Status of Para Worker Engagement District WUA Status Paraworker Paraworker Not Total (WUA/ Non- Available Not available Applicable WUA tank) Anantapur WUA 4 4 Chittoor Non-WUA 1 1 WUA 3 3 East Godavari WUA 4 4 Kadapa Non-WUA 4 4 Krishna WUA 4 4 Kurnool Non-WUA 2 2 WUA 2 2 Nellore WUA 3 1 4 Prakasham Non-WUA 1 1 WUA 1 2 3 Srikakulam Non-WUA 2 2 WUA 1 1 2 Visakhapatnam WUA 4 4 Vizianagaram WUA 2 2 4 West Godavari WUA 4 4 Total 36 6 6 48 86% 14% It was observed during the visits that the paraworkers are not willing to perform their roles in the majority of the tanks due to the current level of honorarium provision and also for the environment prevailing in the villages. A decision to continue with the para worker model (with the

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

current level of honorarium) is to be taken. However, the recent Government provision of local ground forces for facilitating different activities, the village volunteers can be engaged following the appropriate procedures.

2.10 Social Audit and Public Disclosure:

Setting up/ displaying Social Audit Boards (SAB) is one of the important aspects of transparency measures under the project. Beside transparency, the social audit boards help in bringing awareness among the community which may in turn lead to effectiveness of the project. The social audit boards are being set up in all the districts except Krishna, Kadapa and Vizianagaram. However, wherever the boards have been set up, data / information needs to be updated. To get these boards updated, the progress details need to be communicated to WUAs and SOs from time to time. Besides SAB, as part of awareness generation among communities, wall writings were taken up in project villages in the beginning of the project. The status of social audit boards set up in sample project villages visited is as follows.

Table 2.7: Status of Social Audit Board District WUA Status Displayed Not Not Applicable Total (WUA/ Non- Displayed WUA tank) Anantapur WUA 4 4 Chittoor Non-WUA 1 1 WUA 3 3 East Godavari WUA 4 4 Kadapa Non-WUA 4 4 Krishna WUA 4 4 Kurnool Non-WUA 2 2 WUA 2 2 Nellore WUA 4 4 Prakasham Non-WUA 1 1 WUA 3 3 Srikakulam Non-WUA 1 1 2 WUA 1 1 2 Visakhapatnam WUA 1 3 4 Vizianagaram WUA 4 4 West Godavari WUA 1 3 4 Total 27 20 1 48 Percentage (%) 57 43 100

2.11 Water Tax & Corpus Collection:

It is envisaged that the WUA has to conduct joint azmoish along with agriculture, water resources and revenue department to assess the cropping area under the tank. Accordingly, tax will be levied and collected from individual farmers. The major responsibility of tax collection is with the

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Revenue department. There is no event of joint azmoish observed or reported in the field during the reporting period or agriculture season prior to the visit. The involvement of WUA in tax collection is also not reported in any of the project villages. In all the districts (except in East Godavari5), the staff felt that collection of water tax details from the revenue department is a tiresome job. There were several requests (formal in a few cases) and visits to the revenue department that were turned out as failures. Besides information gathering, getting WUAs’ share of water tax/ plough back is also not happening/ not observed in any district during the year. The staff also expressed that the process of getting WUAs’ share is also complicated and needs to be simplified.

Water tax collection and plough back are crucial steps in empowering WUAs. There must be an action plan towards initiating the process. And this action plan must be monitored at all levels periodically. Unless the farmers pay the tax, WUAs won’t get plough back money.

2.12 Support Organizations: The NGOs who have local presence and relevant experience in Community Mobilization, Agriculture Development and Trainings etc., were identified and selected as Support Organizations (SO) to facilitate the implementation of the project interventions through Water User Associations (WUA).The key roles of SOs are to facilitate project implementation process, coordination with line departments who are part of project implementation, community mobilization and creating awareness at community level, support in building capacities of communities, WUAs, preparing project completion reports and submission.

The initial contract with the SOs was for a period of 16 months and based on the performance the contract will be renewed, as per agreement. As the SOs were engaged from the month of March 2019, the performance of SOs was reviewed in the month of June/ July and renewed the contracts of all SOs except two; one from Chittoor and the other one from West Godavari district. Extension of SO services was not given in Chittoor and West Godavari, therefore no SOs available in both the districts. SO performance has been rated regularly and based on the rating has been compared with privious reporting period. Upon analysis, six (6) SOs got better grade(green colour), five (5) remain unchanged (yellow) and remaing five are slipped from the better grade (red). The SO wise analysis is as follows. Table2.8: SO rating across 12 districts Name of Name of District Marks Grade the SO the SO Marks Grade Change JRDS Anantapur JRDS 68 B+ 80 A+ RIPE Chittoor RIPE 38 C 21 C ASBS East Godavari ASBS 55 B 58 B SYA Kurnool SYA 54 B 59 B RAMKY Krishna RAMKY 46 C 73 A ASYARD Nellore ASYARD 29 C 53 B

5 The water tax register can be seen in East Godavari district

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Name of Name of District Marks Grade the SO the SO Marks Grade Change Prerana Nellore Prerana 39 C 52 B EFFORT Prakasam EFFORT 71 A 70 A SARDS Prakasam SARDS 71 A 70 A BREDS Srikakulam BREDS 68 B+ 53 B YCD Srikakulam YCD 72 A 54 B SVDS Visakhapatnam SVDS 45 C 62 B+ SADANA Visakhapatnam SADANA 45 C 63 B+ IRPWA Vizianagaram IRPWA 62 B+ 52 B RHGBMSS Vizianagaram RHGBMSS 72 A 53 B SERVICE West Godavari SERVICE 43 C 48 C Source: PMU

2.13 WUA Self-Rating The key elements of self-monitoring include (a) Participation and Dialogue, (b) Performance, (c) Self-management, and (d) Innovation & Technology Adoption. As per the plan, this event has to be exercised on a quarterly basis and this exercise has to be facilitated by para workers and SO team members. The rating of sample WUA for the reporting period is consolidated in the table below

Table 2.9: Summary of WUA Self-Rating (April-June 2020) District A B Grade C Grade Not Applicable Total Grade Anantapur 2 2 4 Chittoor 2 1 1 4 East Godavari 4 4 Kadapa 3 1 4 Krishna 4 4 Kurnool 2 2 Nellore 3 1 4 Prakasham 4 4 Srikakulam 1 3 4 Visakhapatnam 4 4 Vizianagaram 3 1 4 West Godavari 4 4 Total 2 29 5 10 46 Percent (%) of 36 Tanks 6 81 14

In Kadapa, the rating exercises were not carried out as there is no Support Organisation (SO) to facilitate. The exercises were not conducted (Not applicable) where there is no WUA. Similarly, the rating was not conducted in 2 tanks of Ananthapur as the WUA and MC were defunct during the reporting period. For 36 tanks, rating has been done (excluding 10 tanks in which are either ‘Not applicable’ or ‘defunct’ in Ananthapur district). As per the rating exercise, 81% of the tanks are in “grade B”,

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

14% of the tanks are in “grade C” and the rest of the tanks (6%) are in “grade A” by the end of June 2020. Out of the total sample, only two tanks are in A grade and these two are from Chittoor district. The key factors for better grade are the regular interaction, awareness creation, involvement of other departments (Agri, horti and Fisheries) in the training and awareness program. As suggested in the previous report, a poster to facilitate WUA self-rating exercise was provided to districts which are yet to be utilized. A training of SO teams and para-workers who are the facilitators of the WUA self-rating exercises may result in good impact on WUA functioning. The training may be provided after the pandemic time. It was observed that not all the WUAs are recording the proceedings of WUA self-rating exercise in their books. It may be ensured that these exercises must be recorded in WUA books and used to monitor their graduation.

2.14 Tank development plans & Casecade development plans Tank Development Plans and Cascade Development plans are important activities of the project implementation. This is also one of the means of strengthening WUAs where the members of it participate to restore the traditional irrigation tanks which are connected.

The project has taken up preparing tank and cascade development plans, bringing in a coordinated effort among the related departments. The M&E agency is requested to provide technical support for the preparation of both the plans. Based on the observation of the World Bank during the last mission, interdepartmental meeting/s have also been organised. A Detailed planning process is presented and discussed with the departmental representatives and the Support Organisations (SO) are also oriented accordingly. However, due to pandemic situations and related movement restrictions, the planning process has been delayed.

The tank development plans (TDP) process is going on in project villages. This entire process involves collection of socio economic, cropping patterns, land use, groundwater use, tank irrigation systems, issues related to tank development, marketing information etc., The progress of TDP from all the districts is presented in the following table.

Table 2.10. Summary of TDP exercises in the tanks proposed for the reporting period Field Documentation Exercises Done In Progress District Done Submitted Anantapur 4 2 2 2 Chittoor 1 1 0 0 East Godavari 3 3 0 0 Kadapa 0 0 0 0 Krishna 4 0 0 0 Kurnool 2 2 0 2 Nellore 2 2 0 0 Prakasham 4 4 0 0 Srikakulam 1 1 0 0 Visakhapatnam 3 3 0 0 Vizianagaram 2 0 0 0

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

West Godavari 3 3 0 0 TOTAL 29 21 2 4

2.15 Analysis of WUA Data There are 60 project tanks surveyed during the reporting period. Of these 60 tanks, 48 are project tanks and the rest 12 are non-project (control) tanks. Out of 60 tanks, 50 tanks have WUAs and the rest 10 tanks are Non-WUA tanks. Of the 10 tanks which don’t have WUAs, 8 tanks belong to the project and the rest 2 tanks are control tanks. The following graph summaries the tanks visited. The district wise summary of tanks is also presented below.

Table 2.11. Summary of tanks visited WUA Control Project Total District Control Project Total % status % % Tanks Chittoor 0 1 0% 100% 1 100% Kadapa 1 3 25% 75% 4 100% NON-WUA Kurnool 1 2 33% 67% 3 100% Srikakulam 0 2 0% 100% 2 100% Anantapuram 1 4 20% 80% 5 100% Chittoor 1 3 25% 75% 4 100% East Godavari 1 4 20% 80% 5 100% Kadapa 0 1 0% 100% 1 100% krishna 1 4 20% 80% 5 100% Kurnool 0 2 0% 100% 2 100% WUA Nellore 1 4 20% 80% 5 100% Prakasham 1 4 20% 80% 5 100% Srikakulam 1 2 33% 67% 3 100% Visakhapatnam 1 4 20% 80% 5 100% Vizianagaram 1 4 20% 80% 5 100% West Godavari 1 4 20% 80% 5 100% Total 12 48 20% 80% 60 100%

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

2.16 Ayacutdars: At every WUA level, as part of book keeping, a WUA has to maintain a set of books. Ayacut members register is one of the prescribed registers which give authentic information about ayacutdars and the extent. It was observed that the books are getting updated in the tanks visited.

Based on the data from WUA registers, information available with APDs and in APIIATP website for 48 project tanks, it was observed that while there are about 76% of ayacutdars are male and the rest 24% are female ayacutdars. The same data for control tanks is not availabe for analysis.

The details of ayacutdars by district are given in annexure 2.1 2.17 Tank Uses and Users: The major uses of tanks are irrigation and groundwater recharge. Apart from these, the tanks are also being used for other purposes such as drinking water, cattle grazing, domestic purpose etc., Keeping aside the irrigation and groundwater users, of the 60 tanks visited, the majority of the tanks (42%) are being used for cattle grazing with 76% users followed by washing clothes (23% of the tanks) with just 2% users which is followed by fisheries (20% of the tanks) with 5% users. About 15% of users depending on drinking water from the tanks through Grampanchayat or municipal supply. The details are given in annexure 2.2 While comparing Control and Project tanks, cattle grazing appears to be a popular use in project tanks. This is followed by washing clothes, Fishery and drinking water (by GramPanchayat).

2.18 Presence of Lascar and Neeruganti: The Lascarand Neerugantisystem is observed in some of the tanks visited. The following is the situation in control and project tanks.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Table 2.12.Laskar availability in tanks. No. of Tanks & %

Lascar Available Lascar Not Available Sample Type No % No % CONTROL Total 1 8% 11 92% PROJECT Total 1 2% 47 98% Total 2 3% 58 97%

Table 2.13.Neeruganti availability in tanks. No. of Tanks & %

Neeruganti Available Neeruganti Not Available

Sample Type No % No % CONTROL Total 3 25% 9 75% PROJECT Total 13 27% 35 73% Total 16 27% 44 73%

It is observed that the lascar system exists only in 8% of control and 2% of project tanks. Regarding the Neeruganti system, it exists in 25% of control tanks and 27% in project tanks. It is reported that for Neerugantis in project tanks, 92% is paid by the farmers and rest 8% oby the Government. In control tanks, the farmers are paying for Neerugantis’ (100%). While the ‘kind’ mode of payment to Neeruganti is observed in 62% of project tanks and it is 100% in control tanks. In about 23% of the tanks, Neerugantis are paid in the form of ‘cash’, and in about 15% of the tanks Neerugantis are paid both in the form of ‘cash and kind’.

2.19 Irrigation to Tail End Farmers:

Whenever water is available sufficiently for the season, it is observed that in only 37% of the tanks, the tail end farmers are receiving irrigation. In about 38% of cases the tail end farmers are receiving irrigation in project tanks, whereas it is 33% in case of control tanks. It is observed that the sluices are closed permanently in 17% and 6% of control and project tanks respectively. Lack of maintenance of field channels is the main reason for the tail enders not getting water. The lack of maintenance is also linked to series of droughts and also for the reason the operation and maintenance (O&M) is absent in the tanks.

The district wise details are given in annexure 2.3

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Table 2.14. Water to tail end farmers. No. of Tanks & %

Tail End Tail End farmers Sluices closed farmers Total Tanks not receiving water permanently Sample receiving water Type

No % No % No % No %

CONTROL 4 33% 6 50% 2 17% 12 100

PROJECT 18 38% 27 56% 3 6% 48 100 Total 22 37% 33 55% 5 8% 60 100

Table 2.15. Water to tail end farmers WUA and Non-WUA comparison

Tail End farmers Tail End farmers Sluices closed not receiving receiving water permanently (No. of Total Tanks WUA water. (No. of (No. of tanks) tanks) status tanks)

No % No % No % No % NON- WUA 6 60% 2 20% 2 20% 10 100% WUA 16 32% 31 62% 3 6% 50 100% Total 22 37% 33 55% 5 8% 60 100%

The WUAs tanks when compared to Non-WUA tanks (both project and control), it is observed that in 60% of non WUA tanks the tail ender farmers are receiving water whereas it is 32% in WUA tanks. Also, it can be observed from the above table that in about 8% of the tanks the sluices are closed permanently.

Table 2.16. Water to tail end farmers by Sample type and WUA and Non-WUA comparison.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Tail End farmers Tail End farmers not receiving Sluices closed WUA receiving water water. (No. of permanently (No. of status (No. of tanks) tanks) tanks) Total Tanks Sample Type No % No % No % No % NON- WUA 1 8% 0% 1 8% 2 Control 100

WUA 3 25% 6 50% 1 8% 10

NON- WUA 5 10% 2 4% 1 2% 8 Project 100

WUA 13 27% 25 52% 2 4% 40

Total 22 33 5 60

Within the project tanks, the tanks with WUAs when compared to Non-WUA tanks it is observed that in 10% of non WUA tanks the tail ender farmers are receiving water whereas it is 27% in WUA tanks. About 4% of Non-WUA tanks and 52% of WUA tanks, the tail end ayacut farmers are not receiving water for the reasons mentioned above. Also, it can be observed from the above table that in about 6% of the tanks the sluices are closed permanently.

2.20 Drought & Shortfall years:

About 75% of the tanks suffered drought and shortfall in the last five years. About 30% of tanks suffered 2 shortfalls in the last five years followed by 5 and 3 shortfalls in 20% and 15% of tanks respectively. The table given below explains the drought scenario in the project areas as well as control tanks.

Table 2.17 Number of shortfalls in control and project tanks 35% 31% CONTROL PROJECT 30% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 19% 20% 17% 17% 15% 10% 8% 8% 5% 0% 0% 0% 1 Yr 2 Yrs 3 Yrs 4 Yrs 5 Yrs No Shortfalls

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

It was observed that the majority of the project tanks (31%) had 2 shortfalls in the last 5 years. It was noticed that while about 25% of the project tanks did not suffer any shortfall all the control tanks suffered some kind of shortfalls. Details in annexure 2.4

2.21 Assessment and Allocation of Water: In 17% of cases there is informal understanding among farmers with allocation to head reach farmers. While in 58% of cases there is no assessment and allocation made. In 8% cases, this situation has not arisen as the sluices closed permanently. The below table shows the picture of allocation of water in both control and project tanks.

Table 2.18 Assessment and allocation of water in control and project tanks (%) 70% 60% 60% 50% 50% CONTROL PROJECT 40% 30% 20% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 10% 6% 0% No assessment or Informal understanding Informal understanding Sluices Closed allocation made among farmers with among farmers with Permanently allocation to only head rotation reach

When compared to control and project Tanks, it was observed that ‘No assessment water allocation’ is 50% and 60% in control and project tanks respectively. It noticed that informal understanding among farmers is same in both control and project tanks (17% each).

Table 2.19 Assessment and allocation of water WUA and Non-WUA comparison (%)

Sluices Closed Permanently 6% 20% WUA Informal understanding among 20% farmers with rotation 0%

Informal understanding among NON-WUA farmers with allocation to only head 20% 0% reach

No assessment or allocation made 54% 80%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

When Non WUA and WUA tanks are compared (Project and Control tanks), about 80% of Non WUA tanks have no assessment and allocation is made whereas it is 54% in the WUA tanks group. An informal understanding among farmers is observed in WUA tanks while there is no such

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

assessment or allocation is there in non- WUA tanks. District wise details are enclosed in annexure 2.5

Table 2.20 Assessment and allocation of water with in project tanks Informal No understanding Informal assessment or among farmers with understanding allocation allocation to only among farmers with Sluices Closed made head reach rotation Permanantly Total

Type WUA status % No. % No. % No. % No. % No.

NON-WUA 8 1 0 0 8 1 2 Control WUA 42 5 17 2 17 2 8 1 100 10

NON-WUA 15 7 0 0 2 1 8 Project WUA 46 22 17 8 17 8 4 2 100 40

Total 35 10 10 5 60

Within the project, when Non-WUA and WUA tanks are compared, about 15% of Non-WUA tanks have no assessment and allocation is made whereas it is 46% in the WUA tanks. An informal understanding among farmers with allocation to head reach and Informal understanding with rotation is observed in WUA tanks while there is no such assessment or allocation is there in non- WUA tanks. The scenarios existing in the project tanks can be observed in the above table. On the whole, there is an informal understanding among farmers (34%) in WUA tanks whereas there is no such understanding in Non-WUA tanks. District-wise details are enclosed in annexure 2.5

2.22 Crop planning before the season:

It was reported that in 45% of cases there is no crop planning made for any agriculture seasons (both the control and project tanks). However, there is informal understanding in 50% of cases on wet crops only exists. Table 2.21 Crop planning before season (%) Informal Informal No crop planning understanding understanding Sample Type Grand Total made on only wet on wet and ID crops crops

CONTROL Total 58% 42% 0% 100%

PROJECT Total 42% 52% 6% 100%

Grand Total 45% 50% 5% 100%

When control and project Tanks are compared, no crop planning is observed in 42% of project tanks while it is 58% in control tanks. Informal understanding on both ID and wet crops is observed only in project tanks (6%) compared to project tanks. Informal understanding on only

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

wet crops is observed more in project tanks (52%) compared to control tanks (42%). District wise details are given in Annexure 2.6

Table 2.22 Crop planning before season - WUA and Non WUA comparison Informal Informal No crop planning understanding understanding Sample Type Grand Total made on only wet on wet and ID crops crops NON-WUA 60% 30% 10% 100% WUA 42% 54% 4% 100%

Grand Total 45% 50% 5% 100% When Non-WUA and WUA tanks are compared (Project and Control tanks), in about 60% of Non- WUA tanks no crop planning is observed whereas it is 42% in WUA tanks. There are about 54% of WUA tanks where there is informal understanding on only wet crops which are 30% in non-WUA tanks. Similarly, in about 4% of the WUA tanks informal understanding wet and ID crops is observed while it is 10% in non-WUA tanks. Details can be seen in the above table.

Table 2.23 Crop planning before season – by sample type and WUA and Non WUA comparison Number of tanks % tanks

WUA SampleType Informal Informal Informal Informal status No crop understanding understanding No crop understanding understanding planning on wet and on only wet planning on wet and on only wet made ID crops crops Total made ID crops crops Total

NON- Control WUA 2 2 17% 0% 0% 17%

WUA 5 5 10 42% 0% 42% 83%

NON- Project WUA 4 1 3 8 8% 2% 6% 17%

WUA 16 2 22 40 33% 4% 46% 83%

Total 27 3 30 60

Within the project group, when Non-WUA and WUA tanks are compared, in about 8% of Non-WUA tanks no crop planning is observed whereas it is 33% in WUA tanks. There are about 46% of WUA tanks where there is informal understanding on only wet crops which is only 6% in non-WUA tanks. Similarly, in about 4% of the WUA tanks informal understanding of wet and ID crops are observed while it is 2% in non-WUA tanks. Details can be seen in the above table.

2.23 Water schedule and release:

In about 35% of the tanks, there is no scheduling is noticed while in 57% of tanks informal scheduling among farmers is happening. When project and control tanks are compared, Informal scheduling among farmers is observed as 50% and 58% in control and project tanks respectively. No scheduled water release is observed as 35% in project tanks which is almost the same in

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

control tanks (33%). The water release schedule doesn’t apply for 8% of tanks where the sluices are closed permanently. District-wise details are given in annexure 2.7 Table 2.24 Water schedule - Control and Project tanks comparison (% of tanks) Informal No scheduling Sluices Closed Sample Type scheduling plan Total plan Permanently among farmers CONTROL 50% 33% 17% 100% PROJECT 58% 35% 6% 100% Total 57% 35% 8% 100%

Table 2.25 Water schedule - WUA and Non WUA tanks comparison Informal No scheduling Sluices Closed WUA Status scheduling plan Total plan Permanently among farmers NON-WUA 40% 40% 20% 100% WUA 60% 34% 6% 100% Total 57% 35% 8% 100%

When Non WUA and WUA tanks are compared (Project and Control tanks), no scheduling of water release is noticed as 40% in non WUA tanks whereas it is 34% in tanks with WUA. Informal scheduling among farmers is observed more (60% of the tanks) in WUA tanks compared to Non WUA tanks which is 40%.

Table 2.26 Water schedule - by sample type and WUA and Non WUA comparison Number of Tanks

Sample WUA Informal Type status scheduling plan No scheduling Sluices Closed among farmers plan Permanantly Total

No % No % No % No % NON- Control WUA 1 8% 0% 1 8% 2 17% WUA 5 42% 4 33% 1 8% 10 83% NON- Project WUA 3 6% 4 8% 1 2% 8 17% WUA 25 52% 13 27% 2 4% 40 83%

Total 34 21 5 60

Within the project tanks when Non WUA and WUA tanks are compared, no scheduling of water release is noticed as 8% in non WUA tanks whereas it is 27% in tanks with WUA. Informal scheduling among farmers is observed more (52% of the tanks) in WUA tanks compared to Non WUA tanks which is 6%.

2.24 Mode of water distribution: It was reported that in about 48% of tanks the water distribution is continuous without rotation followed by continuous with rotation (38%). Regulated water supply (daytime) with rotation and

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

without rotation is reported as 2% and 3% respectively. And, the rest of the tanks (8%) have no sluices (sluices closed permanently).

Table 2.27 Mode of water distribution - control and project tanks comparison Regulated Regulated Continuous Continuous (only (only Sluices Sample with without daytime) daytime) Closed Total Type rotation rotation with without Permanently rotation rotation CONTROL 50% 33% 0% 0% 17% 100% PROJECT 48% 40% 2% 4% 6% 100% Total 48% 38% 2% 3% 8% 100%

When control and project tanks are compared, it is observed that Continuous with rotation is predominant in both control (50%) and in project (48%) tanks. The distribution of water ‘continuous without rotation’ is observed as 33% and 40% in control and project tanks. District wise details are given in annexure 2.8 Table 2.28 Mode of water distribution - WUA and non WUA tanks comparison Regulated Regulated Continuous Continuous (only (only Sluices WUA status with without daytime) daytime) Closed Total rotation rotation with without Permanently rotation rotation NON-WUA 50% 20% 10% 0% 20% 100% WUA 48% 42% 0% 4% 6% 100% Total 48% 38% 2% 3% 8% 100%

When Non WUA and WUA tanks are compared (Project and Control tanks), the distribution of water without rotation is 20% and 42% in Non WUA and WUA tanks respectively. Continuous without rotation is observed as almost the same in Non WUA (50%) and WUA (48%) tanks. Table 2.29 Mode of water distribution - by sample type and WUA and Non WUA comparison(Tanks and %) Regulated Regulated (only (only day Continuous daytime) time) Sluices Continuous without with without Closed with rotation rotation rotation rotation Permanantly Total Sample Type WUA status No % No % No % No % No % No %

Control NON-WUA 1 8 0 0 0 1 8 2 17

WUA 5 42 4 33 0 0 1 8 10 83

Project NON-WUA 4 8 2 4 1 2 0 1 2 8 17

WUA 19 40 17 35 0 2 4 2 4 40 83

Total 29 23 1 2 5 60

Within the project tanks, the distribution of continuous without rotation is 4% and 35% in Non WUA and WUA tanks respectively. Continuous with rotation is observed as 8% and 40% in Non-

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

WUA and WUA tanks respectivly. While there is regulated supply with rotation observed in Non- WUA tanks without rotation is observed in WUA tanks. 2.25 Meetings: General body meetings: The general body meetings are observed in 29 WUAs out of 40 WUA tanks which is 73% of tanks. It was reported that the general body meetings are held in the project villages, but the proceedings are not recorded.

Managing Committee meetings: Managing Committee (MC) meetings are being organized in the project villages where the M&E teams visited except in Kadapa district. Due to the current pandemic situation, the team could not spend time in detailed verification of minutes. And, in some cases the records were not available as they are in the custody of the WUA president/ SO staff who were home quarantined. As observed, wherever books are available, the attendance of MC members is varied from district to district, which is in the range of 2 to 6.

The things that get the most attention at the meetings in order of preference are (highest to lowest) works, planning, maintenance of works, collection of water charges, functioning of sub committees, and WUA accounts.

2.26 Others:

2.26.1 Disputes with regard to Water Distribution: The disputes are observed in project tanks in Kadapa and Krishna districts, and in one tank in East Godavari district control tank. The dispute in one tank from Krishna district was between ayacut farmers and fishermen community. The village panchayat intervened to resolve the issue. There is one more tank in Krishna district of the same nature which is not resolved yet. There was an issue from tail-end farmers reported in one tank from Kadapa district where the issue is resolved by farmers themselves.

2.26.2 Adoption of Water saving technologies: It was observed that the water saving technologies are adopted in project villages in non- command area/ rain fed areas but not anywhere in command areas under project tanks.

2.27 Key observations& Suggestions:

1. Looking at the current pandemic situation, where community gathering is not allowed, the capacity building facilitation strategy needs to be reexamined and, if possible, virtual way of training / consultation / discussion may be taken up. It will be helpful not only to keep track of the project activities, but also address the execution aspects, involving the WUA. Secondly, wherever it is feasible, meeting with key resource farmers representing all the sections and all geographical areas of ayacut may be identified and organised till the situation becomes normal. The responsibility of these representatives (key resource farmers) is to communicate the message to the other farmers in the ayacut.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

2. In most of the cases, the paraworkers are not willing to perform their role for multiple reasons such as either the low honorarium or the environment is not supporting to work in villages. A decision to continue with the para worker model (with current level of honorarium) is to be taken. However, the recent Government provision of local ground forces for facilitating different activities, the village volunteers, can be engaged following the appropriate procedures.

3. To update the social audit boards, the responsibility has to be given to SO and paraworker. To enable the updation of social audit boards, the concerned persons have to update the information to the SOs and WUAs/ para workers from time to time so that the social audit boards are updated by paraworker & WUA with the support of SO.

4. There are tanks with 100% civil works completed. Focused effort has to put in these tanks on building community capacities to manage the tank themselves. Project has to facilitate preparation of tank maintenance plans for such tanks (including the tanks near completion of civil works) and also strategies need to be worked out to operationalize the plans.

5. The 3 SO placements are vacant in 3 districts. These can be filled up with suitable and qualified Organization/s.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Sub -Component A2:

Chapter -3

Rehabilitation & Modernization of SSCBI systems

3.1 Introduction:

This subcomponent has anobjective to modernize the irrigation infrastructure of about 1,000 tank systems located in 178 cascades (485 tanks) and 515 independent tanks by adopting a competitive approach for financing the investments. Total area to be covered is about 90,000 ha. Important works to be executed by Water Resources Department (WRD) through its irrigation Divisions include (i) modernizing control structures (diversion weirs), supply channels, and cross- regulation structures; (ii) de-silting feeder and supply channels; (iii) strengthening and upgrading tank bunds, earthen dams, spillways, distribution canals, field channels, and drainage line treatment within the cascade; (iv) installing flow measurement devices in selected irrigation canal/field channel, (v) using modern quality-testing devices to determine soil compaction and the quality and durability of concrete structure. Focus of the report is on the process of execution of different items/ components of works for which contracts are signed with contractors. Before formulating the report, the engineering expert has studied the activities taken up after signing of agreement between the Government and the World Bank as well as before signing the agreement. All observations and suggestions put forward are aimed at timely completion of the works needed for rehabilitation of independent tanks and tank cascades for assured quality. This report is an outcome of the external monitoring taken up for APIIATP for the period (Jan-June 2020). In the approved methodology for External Monitoring, there are 24 LBT tanks and 24 sample tanks. Status of activities in these LBT tanks and sample tanks is discussed. District wise progress of works in different tanks where some civil construction activities are undertaken is presented in annexures. Actions to be taken for accelerating the progress of civil works are presented at the end of this chapter.All these aspects are presented hereunder.

3.1 Detailed Project reports (DPR) DPRs have been prepared for 441 works that include independent tanks and tank cascades during the readiness period before initiation of tendering by the tendering authorities. During the monitoring periodi.e. from January 2020 to June 2020, DPR preparation activities were not taken up.

3.2 Tendering and grounding of works After the completion of due tendering exercise, signing of agreements and completion of all the required procedures, 221 works covering all the 12 project districts of APIIATP are grounded (Table no. 9).

Civil Work activities have been commenced in all the 211 works sometime between December 2018 to March 2019 and all construction agencies had one mobilisation. Thereafter state Assembly elections stalled the works for almost 3 months. Thereafter monsoon season had come and in

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

most of the works progress got hindered as the tanks got filled with water and farmers wanted to use water for irrigation for their crops. Work continued in usual pace in drier districts where the rainfall is comparatively less. Thus, till the end of June 2020, only 8 works have been completed. By the end of June, the period of execution as agreed between the tendering authority and construction agency has expired for most of the on-going works.

3.3 Cumulative Expenditure: A critical analysis Out of total cost of32672.97 lakhs, the cumulative expenditure incurred under A-2 component till the end of June 2020 is Rs. 6446.60lakhs that comes to 19.73 %. Binding reasons such as election process, situation arising due to COVID-19 Pandemic, around five months of irrigation season in Kharif-2019 that hasled to tardy progress of physical works and as a consequential upshot, the expenditure got deferred from the planned schedule/ mile stones contemplated by the DPUs.

Nevertheless, the cumulative expenditure figure could have been improved for the period ending June, 2020 if the administrative hurdles would not have occurred and all these points had been taken care in proper time at different levels in the hierarchy under the State Water Resources Department and State Finance Department. These points are presented below for appreciation of the SPU and World Bank authorities and remediation of them in time in days to come.

a) Bill recorded and pending with DDOs (391.75 lakhs) b) Bills submitted in CFMS and pending for payment ( Rs.1059.42 lakhs for all 12 DPUs) c) The enthusiasm and impetus among construction agencies that would have been there is not found because of inordinate delay in getting their investments getting convalesced. d) The point mentioned at (c) above becomes a bottleneck for the contractors who are small contractors and many of them are not able to invest further as their funds in hand got exhausted. e) Uncertainty prevails in the minds of contractors regarding the probable date when they will get their legitimate dues and obviously there is reluctance to put extra efforts in bringing labour by paying higher wages to those who may be willing to work at construction sitestaking risk and imperatively following COVID-19 protocols and precautions.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Photo: Jungle clearance work for construction of irrigation channel in Bhavanasi tank in Allagdamandal of Kurnool district.

3.4 Physical Progress: A Critical analysis

Physical progress is moderately satisfactory. Though there are very good progress in case of some works the average picture is not satisfactory as there are poor physical progress in a large number of works under execution.in a large number of works. District wise, tank wise analysis was presented in the preceding concurrent monitoring report. It is worth mentioning that from 4th week of March till may 2020. Government had declared lock down as a COVID-19 management strategy. Critical analysis has been made on physical progress and some of the sturdy reasons/factors that surfaces are as follows. I. Non-availability of sand II. Delay in supply of cement III. Non-payment of work bills which are submitted in CFMS portal IV. Pendency in finalisation of deviation statement preparation V. Pendency in approval of deviation statement by the competent authority VI. Policy decision regarding price escalation as ventilated by construction agencies due to rise in prices of construction materials, labour. VII. No policy regarding termination of contracts of no- performing works if they are not resuming the work within a reasonable time after giving reminder/notice VIII. Critical examination of the scenario reveals that in some works,construction was in progress and in others it was not in progress or stalled.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

IX. There is no system of accountability and fixing responsibility on different persons who were taken actions in the interest of timely completion of works to get the APIIATP project completed in time as per the World Banks disbursement schedule.

Photo: Pallegadaanicut construction in progress in village Kottaellavaram of Gologunda Mandalin Visakhapatnam district.

3.5 Calling of Fresh Tenders For maintaining the continuum and pace of progress of works, tenders should be invited during each six month period. It is found during the concurrent monitoring that tendering authorities have not acted in a manner as warranted, to have a second set of works grounded and achieve some physical progress before March 2021 and incur expenditure and get reimbursement from World Bank.

During the concurrent monitoring for this half year period, it is revealed that the DPUs are ready and they probably need a go ahead nod from the concerned authorities that might be governed by the budgetary allocation for APIIATP. Prudent action by the State Finance department is the need of the hour and it will stimulate to boost the expenditure/investment in the rehabilitation and modernisation of tanks to which the Government of Andhra Pradesh is committed.

If we add the figure of liable expenditure pending for payment to the expenditure incurred so far, then figure would be Rs. 7897.57 lakhs. In terms of percentage, it works out to be27.17 %. Investment of almost one fourth of the targeted expenditure figure could have been achieved by the end of June 2020.This shortfall is mainly due to lack of decisions at the appropriate time and expeditious execution of the decisions. Officials concerned should be proactive and should be in readiness in advance to clear the pending expenditure preferably in a week as it is technology driven and application of digital process like CMS.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Table 3.1: Tank Rehabilitation Works SI. District No. of Tanks Taken Agt.Value Expenditure No. Up for Rehabilitation (Rs.InLakhs) incurred so far (Rs. In Lakhs)

1 2 3 4 5

1 Anantapur 18 3241.43 437.62

2 Chittoor 15 1527.442 394.3

3 East Godavari 14 1812.58 239.88

4 Kadapa 3 1132.28 382.59

5 Krishna 17 2271.89 389.46

6 Kurnool 19 4363.51 1364.65

7 SPSR Nellore 38 6318.78 1730.78

8 Prakasam 28 4474.13 1043.39

9 Srikakulam 8 497.51 55.60

10 Visakhapatnam 20 2,860.03 50.92

11 Vizianagaram 20 2550.65 237.41

12 West Godavari 11 1622.74 120.00

Total 211 32672.97 6446.60

Note: Till June.2020

3.6 Works Completed

From different districts the works which are considered to be completed by the DPUs are obtained and the list along with district name is given in table no.10.Efforts should be taken up on component for improvement of water use efficiency in these 7 works.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Photo: Curing of concrete works of surplus weir in Yandari tank of Revidi Village Of PadmanavamMandal in Visakhpatnam district

Table No. 3.2. List of works completed as on 30th June 2020. Sl. Name of Work District No

1 Modernization of Rapthadu tank (Independent) in Rapthadu Ananthapuram Village &Mandal

2 Rehabilitation of Yerrakonda MI tank Independent in Vemula East Godavari Village in GangavaramMandal

3 Rehabilitation of Rupanagudi M.I Tank (Independent) in Kurnool Rupanagudi Village in UyyalawadaMandal

4 Rehabilitation of Sankavaram Tank, Sankavaram (V) and Nellore VinjamuruMandal

5 Rehabilitation of Markapur tank (independent) in Markapur Prakasam Village in MarkapurMandal

6 Rehabilitation of naidu tank (Independent) in Pullayapalli village Prakasam in Donakonda, Mandal

7 Rehabilitation Of Gandlopalli Tank (Independent) In Prakasam Kondareddypalli Village In Tarlupadu, Mandal

8 Rehabilitation of PV Puram tank in PV Puram village, Satyaveedu Chittore mandal

Photo: Tank Bund slope is being dressed to designed slope before turfing in Turimella tank in CumbumMandal of Prakasham district

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

3.7 Tracking of work wise physical and financial progress

Physical and financial progress of each work which is either for an independent tank or a cascade was tracked. The progresses in percentage of different districts are given Annexure. The incremental progress compared to the progress made till the end of December 2019 is marginal. This is mainly ascribed to COVID-19 Pandemic. Besides, CoVID, non- supply of cement well in time, non-resolution of issues arising out of new sand policy has also hampered the progress.

Photo: Cistern under construction in Turimella tank in Cumbum Mandal of Prakasham district

3.8 Extension of Time (EoT)

As per the procedure, the construction agency should apply for EoT. From the data made available to us, only one EoT in Prakasham district is approved so far. This is a procedural requirement. Applying for EoT is the responsibility of construction agency. During concurrent monitoring, it was found that process of EoT has been initiated. In many works, civil construction has been stopped for problem related to sand policy which has come into effect after the new Government. This issue should be posed to SPMU/ water Resources Department for a prudent solution. Without fixing this issue, granting extension of time may not lead to resumption of civil construction in tanks. It seems that first EoT for one year may have to be given in most of the works considering the present status of progress and pace at which the works are progressing. However, the EoT process should be completed by at the earliest by the respective DPUs, Superintending Engineers. If the concerned DPUs are not sure about recommencement of work, then the cancellation procedure may be initiated. Deferring such decisions and not initiating critical review will lead to time over run and subsequently cost enhancement in the concerned works.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Photo: Sluice under construction in Turimella tank in CumbumMandal of Prakasham district, Turimella

3.9 Cancellation of works

Information gathered on each work was studied. After the completion of due diligence, and completion of cancellation procedure, the work needs to be retendered, so that progress, both physical and financial can be targeted till March 2021.

‘

Photo: Joist for fitting of gates Turimella tank in CumbumMandal of Prakasham district

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Table 3.3 Actions to be taken

Sl. No Action Suggested By whom action is to be taken 1 Critical review of each work to assess the possibility of the DPU, DEE, AEE work being completed by the contractor within the 1st EOT 2 Finding a prudent solution the problem arising out of sand SPMU, WRD policy posed by the DPUs 3 Obtaining application from contractors for EoT and getting it DPU, SE scrutinized by the competent authority 4 Processing for cancellation of few works awarded to contractor DPU where the work is not progressing in last 9 months and if the DPU is convinced that work will not be resumed even after the grant of EOT 5 Revision of DPRs wherever necessary before initiating DPU, DEE tendering process 6 Calling of tenders DPU 7 Preparation of DPR for those tanks for which DPRs are not DPU prepared. 8 Giving priority to construction of Cut-throat flume DPU, DEE, AEE, JE

3.10 Conclusion

Concurrent monitoring done during the six monthly period from January 2020 to June 2020 has led to the conclusion that the deferring decision on issue arising out of sand policy has delayed progress in many works and even stopping of the works by the contractor. Though the process for Extension of Time (EoT) is initiated for all works needing EoT, it is not very clear that how the DPUs are contemplating to get the work completed looking at the track record of the contractors over a period of more than one year. Firm planning is necessary with bar diagrams, etc., so that the contractors progress can be monitored against the target they have agreed at the time of applying for EoT. Total expenditure incurred in the entire state under Sub component is 19.73 %.of the total cost as per the agreement signed with construction agencies. Due to COVID-19 pandemic, labour was not available from last week of March which is the main reason. With the announcement of unlock guidelines, the work may be expedited by the contractors. The DPU must insist on the contractors for doing so as ultimately it is the mobilization by the contractors that will lead to acceleration of physical progress and consequently financial progress.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

COMPONENT - A3

Chapter.4 Improving Water Productivity and Efficiency

4.1 Introduction: This sub-component A3 is to support on achieving more irrigation coverage in the tank command area in terms of area coverage by minimizing the gap ayacut. This will coordinate with conjunctive use of surface water and groundwater with crop planning, and water budgeting and this might encourage water sharing through implementing participatory groundwater management. It will help to irrigate more acres within the tank command area directly benefitting other water users or farmers. As per the information, at present, the project districts have 419 PGM group formations. The remaining group formations are being progressed at all district levels.

The team of CTRANconsultants assessed progress and process after June 2020 for half-yearly monitoring report purpose.

4.2 State Level PGM Activity Implementation Progress: The year 2020-2021 has been planned with an allotted budget of Rs 2,24,14,000/- under PGM activity. Till now 42.2% has been sanctioned for 12 districts for implementation with an amount of Rs 94,69,000/-. In this connection,the 1st and 2nd Quarter PGM activities have been implemented during the reporting period. Due to the Corona virus pandemic works have been delayed for the implementation of various activities even though, the budget has been released and technical sanction has been given from the head office to concerned districts.

The total number of project tanks in 12 districts are 1000. Out of 1000 project tanks, 651are approved tanks. Already, 316 PGM groups have been formed at the tank level in 2019-2020; the remaining 16 group formations are held up. Till now, PGM groups of 419 have been formed at the state level.

Table:4.1 State-Level Progress on PGM Activity as on End of June 2020 S PGM Groups Training/ PZ site Selection PZs No Name of the Awareness Drilling District Comple Planed Achieve Planed Achieve Planed Achieve ted in d d d Villages 1 Srikakulam 19 19 7 7 18 18 5 2 Vizianagaram 26 26 8 8 36 36 0 3 Visakhapatna 17 17 10 10 40 11 8 m 4 East Godavari 10 10 3 3 2 2 2 5 West Godavari 10 10 5 5 2 2 2 6 Krishna 66 66 15 15 34 0 0 7 Prakasham 56 56 17 15 40 7 18 8 SPS Nellore 50 50 33 20 82 56 2

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

S PGM Groups Training/ PZ site Selection PZs No Name of the Awareness Drilling District Comple Planed Achieve Planed Achieve Planed Achieve ted in d d d Villages 9 Chittoor 25 25 9 9 46 46 2 10 Anantapur 79 79 59 9 59 2 2 11 Kurnool 20 20 46 7 0 0 0 12 YSR Kadapa 41 41 0 0 18 18 0 Total 419 419 212 108 377 198 41

Note: Some district numbers included are from the beginning of the project and rest are from the 2020- 2021 year 1st& 2nd quarter plan.

As per the available information from APD’s -PGM, till now 419 PGM groups have been planned and formed. Orientation training/ awareness programs are planned for 212, but108 programs awereexecuted, 377 piezometers site selection points approved from the head office, 198 grounded, respectively. In Kadapa district,thistraining has not yet started due to no Supporting Organization..

4.3 Drilling of Piezometer Progress at District Levels: For the year 2020-2021, a total of 377 piezometers sites have been selected and details were sent for technical approvals tohead office, 198 points have got approval in all the districts. Within those 198 points, only 41 points were drilledat district level,and in the remaininglocations, drilling works are in progress at all areas.

Till now, drilling works for 42 Piezometer filter points /borewell points have been completed at the state level. These drilling points i.e 18 in Prakasham, 8 points in Visakhapatnam, 5 points in Srikakulam, 2 points each in East & West Godavari, Nellore, Chittoor, and Anantapuram. Remaining Vizianagaram, Krishna, Kurnool, and Kadapa districts drilling works have not started.

Thesedrilling operationsare conducted and supervised by the GW&WAdepartment nodal officersin charge. Geologist/Assistant and Hydro-geologistare also involved in the drilling activitiesat all district levels, details ofstrata change observations,water & soil samples are collectedfor labtests, designing of casing pipes and itslengths, andbore welldrillingcompletion reports were kept in thedepartment. Some of the drillings of Piezometer filter points under APIIATP in Visakhapatnam district for the year 2020-21 and bore well sample litho-log of Jilugumilli village photographs are shown below:

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Photo: Dimili village Filter point, Photo: Chowdawada Filter point, VSP,TamarcharlaChannel Tank, Beneficiary: T VSP,ChowdawadaChannel Tank Seshagiri Beneficiary: K Nooka Raju

Photo: Melupaka village Filter point, VSP, Photo: Sample Litho-log from Jilugumilli, West ChalamalaPallapuChannel Tank, Beneficiary: Near Godavari District, Total depth 80m, Casing 12m, Community Hall Beneficiary: Cherri Suguna

4.4 The Progress in Water Sharing among Farmers at District Levels: For 32 tanks ayacut areas water sharing pipeline estimation was conducted at all district levels for the period of 2020-21. The objective of this is to promote and plan for groundwater sharing to supply through PVC pipes for water sharing from the borewellownerstothe recipient, particulars are collected from the field level within the tank command area and estimations are done by the district level and submitted for financial approvals. Remaining appropriate site selection points and

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

pipe length estimations are in progress for water sharing by nearby farmers in a wise water usage manner.

Water sharing pipeline surveys, estimations have been completed and approvalswere sought from the head office for 32 tanks. Based onthe water sharing guidelinesfor this project, each tank is proposed to have pipe length 0f approximately 600 meters from the borewell owner to the receiver (if the borewell owner willing to share their water to the receiver). If this length is not sufficient, then the receivers will be ready to bear the extra pipe length costs at field level. In general, between bore well owner site to receiver site, pipe length is 200 m in the field level for additional area acres irrigation during Kharif & Rabi seasons.

To promote water sharing activities around borewell, the farmers should be motivated and awareness need to be created by the project staff. The groundwater selling/buying price in generaldecided per hour / per acre is approximately between Rs 500 to 600/. This situation depends on Kharif /Rabi/Zaid seasons for different crops.

However, the remaining PGM activity programs like the supply of PHM equipment and monitoring work, groundwater estimation wok, community bore wells for drilling works, crop water budgeting workshops, conjunctive use of surface and groundwater are to be planned/under progress at district levels.

PHM data collection equipment supply, PHM data display, workshops of crop water budgeting, field days (at the end of the hydrological year) and groundwater sharing between adjacent, willing farmers, sharing completions for additional farmers benefit and also additional area acres proposed for irrigation during Kharif & Rabi season need to be implemented at district levels

4.5 Training/ Awareness programs for PGM Groups: Department officials have planned to conduct 212 orientation training/awareness programs for this year,but 108 programs have only been conducted. These trainings are slow due to this COVID-19 impact at the field level.Now, the group members have necessary awareness and understanding of the importance of PGM. However, the project has planned to develop water management, crop water budgeting, and water sharing. In Kadapa district, these trainings have not yet started due to the Supporting Organization problem. This awareness training program was conducted at the tank level; about 60 – 80 participants have been involved per event. For each event, 19-20 thousand rupees have been sanctioned.. The key resource persons for the training are:  Geologists,  Agriculture offices,  NGO representatives, and  PGM experts. These trainings are in participatory mode. The trainings have been implemented through material developed at the district level by the APDs and NGOs, but no standard training modules have been

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

used. All the APD – PGMs are keen on modules for these trainings. The PMU needs to work out the plan to conduct a workshop to develop modules.

During the training period, the following topics have been covered.  Groundwater estimation recharge and draft,  Crop wise balance estimation plans,  Crop water requirement,  Crop water budgeting procedures towards improved water use efficiency  Water sharing workshop  New bore wells usage, and water-saving techniques  Conjunctive use of both surface water and groundwater.

4.6 Observations / Suggestions  Awareness workshop needs to be organized for all participatory Groundwater management APDs to share experiences and for cross learnings with & Support Organizations  After the unlock period, drilling delays happened due to the period being middle of the crop harvest and unsuitable site conditions due to heavy rains and waterlogging effects.  Module training, I, II, and III or water management practices need to be carried out by group members.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Component B1

Chapter.5

Climate Smart Crop Production and Diversification

5.1.Introduction

The overall objective of sub-component-“Climate Smart Crop Production and Diversification” is to enhance resilience of agriculture production systems through technological options, improve productivity, reduce the cost of production by bringing input efficiency, develop capacity of farmers in production technologies, and overall, improve the income of the farmers.

The present third concurrent monitoring report covers the work progress occurred between January to June 2020 . Monitoring team has noticed slow progress under APIIATP in the current reporting period due to the budget constraints in the initial months and unexpected Covid-19 pandemic situation and there after imposed lockdown in the state in the later months. Owing to virus prevalence and pandemic code imposed in the state, field staff could not be conducted trainings, capacity building activities and preparatory works related to agriculture/horticulture under APIIATP. However, identification of beneficiaries for the approved components is under progress.

As per the mandate, CTRAN team has conducted HH survey and also visited some of the project tank villages and also had discussions with the field staff, farmers and collected required data. Household survey carried out at the village level and interaction with beneficiary farmers helped the monitoring team in understanding the project benefits and their impact at household level. Monitoring team has also discussed with the concerned officers at various levels viz.; Agri expert team at PMU; Nodal Officers at Department of Agriculture& Department of Horticulture; District level officers of Department of Agriculture & Dept. of Horticulture, DPU, APDs and discussed the project implementation status.

The work progress in the current reporting period is limited to the preparation of state action plan for the financial year 2020-21, based on which district action plan is to be prepared. The process of preparation of district action plan is under process. Department of Agriculture and Dept. of Horticulture under this sub-component B1 have prepared their state level action plan for the financial year 2020-21.

5.2 Household Survey And Status of Indicators of Project Development Objectives

As part of the monitoring assignment, CTRAN team has also carried out a household (HHs) survey in both APIIATP tank villages and control tank villages (non-project villages).

As there were limited agriculture interventions implemented so far, intervention wise assessment is not possible. However, the household data is analysed to study the status of ‘PDO-Indicators’ in achieving the project development objectives and also the intermediate result indicators as mentioned in the result framework.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

The household survey for the present concurrent monitoring-3 captures the yield data of project specified crops viz paddy, groundnut, chilli crop and red gram and area increased /decreased for the same crops. The present household survey conducted to assess project progress between January to June 2020, captures the crop data with respect to the previous season, i.e Rabi season of 2019-2020 only. Result Indicator wise progress is discussed here under.

5.3 Productivity of specific crops: 5.3.1 Productivity of Paddy (MT/Ha)

District wise paddy yields obtained during the rabi season of 2019-20, in tank ayacut of project and control tanks is presented in Table 5.1.In general, the crop productivity used to be high in rabi season compares to kharif. Besides, improved crop management practices, proper irrigation also directly influence the paddy yields. The average paddy yields were reported high in project tanks (6.09MT/Ha) compare to control (5.94MT/Ha). Further, the yields were high wherever the tank rehabilitation works under APIIATP were completed. Among the project tanks, the highest paddy yields were reported in East Godavari district (7.57MT/Ha) followed by West Godavari district (7.09MT/Ha). The paddy yields are relatively low in north coastal districts viz., Srikakulam, Visakhapatnam and Vizianagaram, comparatively with other districts. Tank rehabilitation works proposed under APIIATP and proposed project interventions in agriculture when implemented fully are expected to increase the paddy productivity. Project efforts in this direction are in progress.

Table 5.1: Paddy crop productivity during rabi season of 2019-20, in tank ayacut of project and control tanks. Rabi Season Paddy Cop Total of LBT + Sl. LBT Tanks Sample Tanks Control Tanks District Sample Tanks No No. of Avg.Yield No. of Avg.Yield No. of Avg.Yield No. of Avg.Yield Farmers MT/Ha Farmers MT/Ha Farmers MT/Ha Farmers MT/Ha 1 Ananthapur 29 6.59 13 6.36 42 6.52 11 6.04 2 Chittoor 13 5.67 30 5.88 43 5.82 11 6.58 3 East Godavari 22 7.38 12 7.93 34 7.57 15 6.88 4 Kadapa 8 5.20 2 5.55 10 5.27 1 6.62 5 Krishna 26 7.01 30 6.86 56 6.93 14 6.62 6 Kurnool 30 5.66 30 5.64 60 5.65 15 5.22 7 Nellore 15 6.95 14 6.81 29 6.88 6 6.02 8 Prakasham - - - 0.00 - - - - 9 Srikakulam - - 2 4.58 2 4.58 5 5.92 10 Visakhapatnam 26 5.08 30 5.04 56 5.06 15 5.00 11 Vizianagaram 2 4.68 7 4.77 9 4.75 6 4.16 12 W. Godavari 2 7.1 5 7.08 7 7.09 1 6.58 Total 173 6.12 175 6.05 348 6.09 100 5.94

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

5.3.2 Productivity of Groundnut crop(MT/Ha):

District wise groundnut yields obtained during rabi season of 2019, in tank ayacut of project and control tanks is presented in Table 5.2.

In Andhra Pradesh, groundnut crop in rabi season is largely grown in uplands of non-ayacut area and rarely in tail end area, under bore well irrigation. During the season , groundnut crop was grown in only Nellore district, obtained an average yield of 2MT/Ha. With increased irrigation facility created under the APIIATP project as the project progresses, more area under groundnut crop may be expected. Efforts in this direction under the project is in progress. The average groundnut crop yield obtained in ayacut area of control villages is 1.92MT/Ha.

Table 5.2:Groundnutcrop productivity during rabi season of 2019, in tank ayacut of project and control tanks. Rabi Season Groundnut Cop Total of LBT + LBT Tanks Sample Tanks Control Tanks Sample Tanks

District No. of Avg.Yield No. of Avg.Yield No. of Avg.Yield No. of Avg.Yield Farmers MT/Ha Farmers MT/Ha Farmers MT/Ha Farmers MT/Ha

------1 1.98 Chittor Nellore 4 2 - - 4 2 1 1.85 Total 4 2 - - 4 2 2 1.92

5.3.3 Productivity of ChilliCrop (MT/Ha):

District wise chilly yields obtained during the rabi season of 2019, in tank ayacut of project and control tanks is presented in Table 5.3.

In Andhra Pradesh chilly is largely grown as a commercial crop and sold as dry red chilly. Only one crop of commercial chilly crop is possible in a year. In Andhra Pradesh the crop is sown in August- September months and harvested between February-March months. Only single crop as commercial crop is taken in a year. Hence, the yield of red chilly can be captured during the HH survey conducted for rabi season crop and reported in concurrent monitoring report that covers the project progress between January - June months (first six months of the year). In the year 2019, chilly crop for commercial purpose was grown in only sample tank villages in Anantapuram district, with an average crop yield obtained is 4.09 MT/Ha. With increased irrigation facility and market linkage proposed to be created under the APIIATP project as the project progresses, more area under chilly crop may be expected with good yields. Efforts in this direction under the project is in progress.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Table 5.3:chilly crop productivity during in 2019, in tank ayacut of project and control tanks. Rabi Season chilly Crop Total of LBT + LBT Tanks Sample Tanks Control Tanks District Sample Tanks

No. of Avg.Yield No. of Avg.Yield No. of Avg.Yield No. of Avg.Yield Farmers MT/Ha Farmers MT/Ha Farmers MT/Ha Farmers MT/Ha Ananthapuramu - - 8 4.09 8 4.09

5.4 Rabi cropped area in tank ayacut in project villages: 5.4.1 Paddy area in tank ayacut(Ha):

Paddy is the major crop grown in the tank ayacut in rabi season. The availability of water in the tank determines the extent of rabi paddy cultivation. Farmers ascertain the preference of paddy over other crops is due to the sub-soil seepage of tank water, hence, unable to cultivate any crop other than paddy. Moreover, in most cases, soil structure is also altered due to cultivation of paddy crop season after season. However, other crops such as pulses, oil seeds, vegetables etc are grown in middle reach and tail end area wherever seepage is less and soils are well drained. Middle reach and tail end tank area provides a great scope for crop diversification in rabi season.

Area covered under paddy cultivation during Rabi season of 2019, in tank ayacut of project and control tanks is presented in Table 5.4.Majority of project tanks are seasonal in nature and water availability is limited to few months in a year. Together in 12 project districts, only 348 farmers have taken up rabi paddy cultivation to the extent in 459.02 Ha, on an average accounting to 1.32Ha per farmer. Whereas, together in 12 control tanks only 100 farmers have taken up rabi paddy cultivation to the extent in 98.62 Ha, on an average accounting to 0.99 Ha per farmer, which is less than the corresponding figure of project tanks. It is noticed that the tank rehabilitation civil works in project area is in progress. Once the irrigation facility increases in ayacut area, especially to middle reach and tail end area, provides a scope for increased Rabi cultivation and also diversified cropping in the middle reach and tail end. Further, the gap ayacut area can also be brought into cultivation.

Table 5.4: Area covered under paddy cultivation during rabi season of 2019-20, in tank ayacut of project and control tanks.

Rabi Season Paddy Crop

Sl. Total of LBT + District LBT Tanks Sample Tanks Control Tanks No Sample Tanks

No. of Area No. of Area No. of Area No. of Area Farmers (Ha) Farmers (Ha) Farmers (Ha) Farmers (Ha) 1 Ananthapuramu 29 115.47 13 16.73 42 132.20 11 6.04 2 Chittoor 13 10.4 30 64.53 43 74.93 11 11.30 3 East Godavari 22 17.17 12 7.97 34 25.14 15 11.48 4 Kadapa 8 4.05 2 0.78 10 4.83 1 1.00 5 Krishna 26 21.31 30 19.89 56 41.20 14 12.00 6 Kurnool 30 69.18 30 38.88 60 108.06 15 24.40

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Rabi Season Paddy Crop

Sl. Total of LBT + District LBT Tanks Sample Tanks Control Tanks No Sample Tanks

No. of Area No. of Area No. of Area No. of Area Farmers (Ha) Farmers (Ha) Farmers (Ha) Farmers (Ha) 7 Nellore 15 19.16 14 12.60 29 31.76 6 4.50 8 Prakasham 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 - 0 9 Srikakulam 0 0.00 2 0.80 2 0.80 5 11.24 10 Visakhapatnam 26 9.20 30 12.78 56 21.98 15 6.47 11 Vizianagaram 2 2.40 7 2.35 9 4.75 6 3.2 12 W. Godavari 2 6 5 7.37 7 13.37 1 6.98

Total 173 274.34 175 184.68 348 459.02 100 98.624

5.4.2 Groundnut crop area in tank ayacut(Ha):

Area covered under groundnut cultivation during rabi season of 2019, in tank ayacut of project and control tanks is presented in Table 5.5.Rabi season groundnut crop in AP state is preferably grown in uplands of non-ayacut area and at tail end of ayacut area, largely under borewell irrigation. Among the project districts, rabi groundnut is cultivated only under LBT tanks of Nellore districts, to the extent in only 5.30 Ha. The groundnut acreage is expected to increase with increased irrigation facility created due to the tank rehabilitation works taken up under APIIATP. Increased tank water storage area due to project interventions also facilitates recharging of bore wells in tank ayacut area. There is a need to motivate the farmers to take up groundnut crop under bore well irrigation. Groundnut in control tank ayacut area is limited to 2.43Ha only.

Table 5.5: Area covered under groundnut cultivation during rabi season of 2019, in tank ayacut of project and control tanks.

Rabi Season Groundnut Crop

Sl. Total of LBT + District LBT Tanks Sample Tanks Control Tanks No Sample Tanks No. of Area No. of Area No. of Area No. of Area Farmers (Ha) Farmers (Ha) Farmers (Ha) Farmers (Ha)

1 Chittoor ------1 1.62

2 Nellore 4 5.30 - - 4.00 5.30 1 0.81

Total 4 5.30 0 0 4 5.30 2 2.43

5.4.3 chilly crop area in tank ayacut (Ha):

Area covered under chilly cultivation in 2019, in tank ayacut of project and control tanks is presented in Table 5.6. chilly crop is commercially grown for marketing as dry-red chilly. Commercial chilly cultivation was reported only in Anantapuram district to the extent in 13.34 Ha.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Many ayacut farmers, especially the tail end farmers have expressed interest in commercial chilly cultivation under bore wells provided there is an assured irrigation and marketing support for the red chillies. Tank rehabilitation works under APIIATP provides scope for increased water availability in bore well through ground water recharge. Further, the project is also promoting crop specific CIGs and facilitating the market linkage on commercial scale. Efforts in this direction is in progress.

Table 5.6: Area covered under chilly cultivation in 2019, in tank ayacut of project and control tanks.

chilly Crop in 2019

Sl. Total of LBT + District LBT Tanks Sample Tanks Control Tanks No Sample Tanks No. of Area No. of Area No. of Area No. of Area Farmers (Ha) Farmers (Ha) Farmers (Ha) Farmers (Ha)

1 Anantapuram - - 8 13.34 8 13.34 -

5.4.4 Redgram crop area in tank ayacut (Ha):

Area covered under red gram cultivation during rabi season of 2019, in tank ayacut of project and control tanks 5.7. Cultivation of pulse crops in paddy fallows not only fetches good income and also improves soil fertility for the follow-up kharif paddy. Unlike paddy crop, redgram cultivation yields good with 1-2 critical irrigations. When cultivated in paddy fallows in suitable soils, the crop can also utilize the residual soil moisture and promote efficient utilization of tank water. The redgram cultivation in the project area is expected to increase by facilitating market linkage through CIGs/FPOs. The efforts in this direction through the project is in progress. In the rabi season of 2019, redgramin the project tank villages is cultivated to the extent in 7.98 Ha in only East Godavari district. Together in 12 control tanks, redgram is cultivated in 13.46Ha, spread in East Godavari and Srikakulam districts.

Table 5.7:Area covered under red gram cultivation during rabi season of 2019, in tank ayacut of project and control tanks.

Rabi Season Red gram Crop

Sl. Total of LBT + District LBT Tanks Sample Tanks Control Tanks No Sample Tanks No. of Area No. of Area No. of Area No. of Area Farmers (Ha) Farmers (Ha) Farmers (Ha) Farmers (Ha) East 1 8 7.98 Godavari 8 15 11.64 7.98

2 Srikakulam ------3 1.82

Total 8 7.98 0 0 8 7.98 18 13.46

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

5.5. Work Progress Under Agriculture Sector

The team has noted change of interventions under agriculture sector and the changes were done with the approval of PMU, finance dept and the World Bank. As per the latest plan, dept. of agricultural in the FY 2020-21intends to focus only in 5 districts viz., Srikakulam, Vizianagaram, Visakhapatnam, Uplands of East & West Godavari districts instead of 12 districts. Thereafter, if demand arises, the same activities will be implemented in the entire state, except Guntur district. This is in view of relatively low productivity of crops and less food grain production contributed from Srikakulam, Vizianagaram, Visakhapatnam and agency areas of East Godavari and West Godavari districts to the state average figures, it is decided to focus the agriculture interventions in these low performing districts so as to bring the productivity and production levels of food grain crops in these districts at par with the state average. It was felt appropriate to allocate budget of this component for investment in these low performing districts, including the agency areas of East Godavari and West Godavari districts.

5.5.1 State Level Agriculture Action Plan Prepared For The Financial Year 2020-21

The Action Plan of APIIATP is revised to align with Govt. priorities duly ensuring the achievement of project objective as below;

1. to implement the project in 5 districts viz., Srikakulam, Vizianagaram, Visakhapatnam, Uplands of East & West Godavari districts instead of 12districts.

2. To promote FPOs in tank villages and implement the project activities through FPOs.

3. To assign Joint Collector RBK as Nodal Officer for implementation of APIIATP project and implement the project in the districts under his Monitoring& supervision.

4. Activities revised to be in alignment/synchronization with Govt priority programmes viz., RBK, Promoting Post harvest management, Promotion of Agri business and Farm mechanization and promoting Market driven agriculture.

The action plan for the financial year 2020-21 was prepared and formally approved at Agri.Commissionerate level. The same has been submitted for approval at PMU. District wise targets are fixed, based on which districts are supposed to prepare the district plan.

State level action plan for the financial year 2020-21 is prepared for 5 districts, viz., Srikakulam, Vizianagaram, Visakhapatnam, East Godavari and West Godavari. A detailed consolidated plan of action with year wise physical and financial targets for the rest of project period, based on which year wise targets are to be drawn is yet to be prepared. Detailed state action plan is presented as Annexure 5.1. The new interventions proposed and interventions to be taken up in the financial year 2020-21 are discussed here under;

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

5.6 Formation of FPOs and providing services through FPOs in tank villages of 5 districts:

Dept. of Agriculture has proposed to form new FPOs in the proposed project districts. Project also support basic office infrastructure, office rent and utility expenses. Besides, also support honorarium of FPO Manager/CEO. The MANAGE is already on board as ABSO for conducting the supply and value chain analysis, market intelligence and will suggest business plan for FPOs. As a first step towards FPO formation, CIGs will be formed in the tank villages in these 5 districts and later the CIGs from cluster villages will be federated to form a registered FPOs. Project will be supporting 100% cost of group formation and FPO registration. Services of local NGOs will be availed in FPO formation.

Table 5.8 District wise target number of FPOs to be formed in the year 2020-21

 Srikakulam 7  Vizianagaram 7  Visakhapatnam 9  East Godavari 5  West Godavari 5

5.7 Support to FPOs 5.7.1 Promoting Integrated Farming Systems (IFS) through FPOs

In-order to promote the concept of IFS among the farmers, it is proposed to demonstrate IFS models in 2 Ha land in farmer’s fields, with 100% financial support from the project. IFS models suitable to that area combining >1 agri-allied sector to mitigate the climate vagaries and to increase farmers income. Area specific, suitable IFS models will be arrived with the technical guidance of ICAR/KVK and SAU’s. Further, farmers whoever is interested to adopt the system will be provided with financial assistance to the extent of 100% of cost of cultivation, up to a maximum extent of 2 Ha for each farmer. Farmers will be trained on IFS system.

Table 5.9 District wise acreage (in Ha) of IFS model plots to be demonstrated and promoted among the farmers in the year 2020-21 Activity Srikakulam Vizianagaram Visakhapatnam East West Total Godavari Godavari Area (Ha) IFS 47 47 55 28 30 207 demonstration (in Ha) Promoting IFS 564 564 660 336 360 2484 adoption (in Ha)

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

5.8 Promoting farm mechanization & Infrastructure support through FPOs

Once the FPOs are formed, will be provided with post-harvest and production infrastructure for ease of production and efficient handling of produce and profitable marketing. It is proposed to provide following infrastructure at project subsidy;

. Primary processing-cleaning and dehulling equipment at 90% project assistance. . Establishment of Custom Hiring Centres - land preparatory to harvesting equipmentat 50 % project assistance. . Supply of water carrying pipes and water lifting devicesat 50 % project assistance.

Table 5.10 District wise infrastructure to be provided in the year 2020-21 District Primary processing Custom Hiring Centres Sypply of water units (Nos) (CHC)(Nos) carrying pipes (Ha) Srikakulam 12 25 235

Vizianagaram 12 25 235

Visakhapatnam 14 27 275

East Godavari 7 14 140

West Godavari 7 15 150

Total 52 106 1035

5.8.1 Support to District Resource Centres(DRCs)

Project also support infrastructure &technical support for setting up of District Resource Centres (DRCs) in the 5 project districts.

5.8.2 Capacity building to farmers, FPOs and Extension Staff (VAAs/VHAs/VSAs)

Govt. of AP has recruited Village Agri. Assistants (VASs), Village Horticulture Assistants (VHAs) and Village Sericulture Assistants (VSAs) for every 1000Ha/ cluster of villages, reporting to Panchayaths. The services of VAA/VHA/VSA are of great help in implementation of the project smoothly at ground level. There is a need to orient VASs/VHAs on APIIATP. They are the functionaries working at tank level. Hence, it is proposed to organize technical training programs to FPOs and village extension staffto improve the efficiency level of the services these functionaries render to the project. Besides, training programs and exposure visits to farmers are also proposed in the APIIATP project. Table 5.11 District wise number training & capacity building programs proposed in the year 2020- for Village Extension Staff trainings- 76

 Srikakulam 14  Vijayanagaram 21  Vishakapatnam 21  East Godavari 11

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

 West Godavari 9

5.9. Work progress under horticulture sector

Along with agriculture, the project will support horticultural activities in the project districts. Promotion of climate resilient practices in horticultural activities will be the cross-cutting area in the overall intervention. The team has interacted with concerned experts at SPMU, nodal officers at Dept. of Horticulture and over phone interacted with district wise DPMU team, APDs and SOs to get the project implementation status.

Dept. of Horticulture has submitted thework done report for the year 2019-20.In horticulture, by the end of March 2020, a number of initiatives have been taken such as (a) area expansion under horticultural crops in 307.44 Ha.; (b) protected cultivation through poly house and shed net houses; (c) rejuvenation of old mango and sweet orange orchards (137.33 Ha.); (d) canopy management (in 291.01 Ha.); (e) promotion of water soluble fertiliser (127.16 Ha.), (f) ICM and INM in horticultural crops (891.72 Ha.), (g) creation of permanent pandals (26.34 Ha.); and (h) capacity building of Staff / officials and farmers.

Table 5.12 Progress under Horticulture Activities by the end of March 2020 S.No Key Activities Unit Project Plan Achievement % 2019-20 (up to March 2020) Achievement A Area Expansion of Horticulture Crops Banana 1.8 X 1.8 m) Ha 112.28 72.01 64 Papaya (1.8 X 1.8 m) Ha 69.83 35.00 50 Sweet Orange (6X6 m) Ha 27.80 2.80 10 Tomato Ha 72.42 17.70 24 Cashew Ha 13.20 7.51 57 Cocoa Ha 7.70 30.54 397 chilly Ha 214.77 70.00 33 Turmeric Ha 39.00 38.38 98 Vegetables Ha 107.86 33.50 31 Sub-Total 763.66 307.44 40 B Protected Cultivation Poly House (4000 Sq. 1 0.90 0.40 m=1 Unit) Unit 44 Shade net house (4000 1 12.30 6.90 Sq. m=1 Unit) Unit 56 Sub-total 13.20 7.30 55 C Rejuvenation Mango Ha 121.13 82.33 68 Sweet Orange Ha 55.00 55.00 100 Sub-Total 176.13 137.33 78

D Canopy Management Mango Ha 294.49 224.99 76 Cocoa Ha 76.00 66.02 87 Sub-Total 570.49 291.01 51

E Adoption of water- Ha 135.80 127.16 soluble fertilizers 94

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

S.No Key Activities Unit Project Plan Achievement % 2019-20 (up to March 2020) Achievement F ICM & INM in Ha 1274.92 891.72 Horticulture crops 70 G Permanent Pandals Ha 30.95 26.34 85 H Capacity Building Farmer Training (District No. 105 27 Level) (Batches) 26 Farmers visit (within No. 60 6 State) (Batches) 10 Farmer visit (outside No. 42 6 State) (Batches) 14 Sub-Total 207 39 19

Department has also prepared action plan for the financial year 2020-21 under APIIATP. Intervention wise achievement up to March 2020 and intervention wise targets for 2020-21 are discussed here under;

5.9.1 State Level Horticulture Action Plan Prepared For The Financial Year 2020-21

State level action plan is prepared for the financial year 2020-21. District action plans are yet to be prepared by each of the project districts. The monitoring team have been told that the productivity enhancement activities and quality enhancement activitiesnow on wards will be organised under the supervision of newly established RhytuBharosaKendras (RBKs) in the selected village of project area.Detailed state level action plan is attached at the end of the report as Annexure-5.2.The gist of the state action plan is discussed here under;

State action plan is consolidation of district plans?

 It is proposed to take up are expansion under banana crop to the extent in 34.59 Ha and under cocoa crop under 17.47Ha, during the year 2020-21.Beneficiaryselectionfor the same is under progress.  Cashew/Cocoa canopy management is proposed in 309.69 Ha.  Under protected cultivation, 4 units of shade net houses is proposed.  It is proposed to promote water soluble fertilizers to the extent in 541.45 Ha in the project area.  Keeping in view the importance of ICM/INM practices, 1343.35Ha is targeted to promote the same.  Realising the benefit of vegetable cultivation with the help of permanent pandals, further 28.5 Ha area will be brought under this system in the year 2020-21.  For the enhancement of fruit quality, fruit covering will be promoted for mango (in 400Ha), guava (in 220Ha), pomegranate (in 215Ha). Besides, quality improvement of banana in175 Ha and promoting fruit harvesting with the help of fruit pickers is also proposed in 110Ha.  Training and capacity building programmes will be organised in the knowledge center of RBK.  District level Farmers Training (54nos)

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

5.9.2 Monitoring Team’s Field Visit to Project Areas & Observations

As part of third concurrent monitoring field visit, project interventions were implemented in only 4 districts viz., Srikakulam, Visakhapatnam, Vizianagaram and west Godavari. The team has come across few agriculture/horticulture interventions that were implemented as per the earlier action plans (years 2018-19 and 2019-20). Team had interacted with the beneficiary farmers and observed the followings.

In Srikakulam district, trainings were organized at district level, village level and in KVK located at Amudalavalasa. These programs were organized to sensitize the farmers and field staff on APIIATP project interventions and implementation modalities. Further, farmers from these tank villages were also taken to exposure visit to NRRI, Cuttack and RARS at Maruteru during Kharif season of 2019-20. Farmers were seen happy and expressed satisfaction over the visit. During the visit, farmers have learned various improved paddy cultivation techniques, pest and nutrient management and have seen the fields of new improved pest and disease resistant paddy varieties, visited mini kit programs etc.

In Visakhapatnam district, orientation on APIIATP was conducted in Kanumala tank in Nakkapallimandal and Krishnamraju tank in Padmanabhammandal. As an impact of training programs, farmers got motivated to include pulses in crop rotation in anticipation of project subsidy support. However, as they didn’t get the subsidy on time, they bear the total cost.

In Vizianagaram district, in Jami mandal, green manure seeds of Daincha (380 kgs) and Sunhemp (160 kgs) were distributed to farmers in Om Namahshivaya tank village and Ramudu tank village, distributed at 100% subsidy. Besides, 50 bags of paddy seeds (MTU 1121) were also distributed to farmers at 100% subsidy. Farmers were seen happy for the increased paddy yields and also reduction in Urea application due to the green manuring. However, not much benefits were realized with the MTU1121 paddy variety, as the variety has very little dormancy period (get germinated if there is rainfall in the post-harvest and if the harvest is in the field) and got germinated with one shower. However, looking at its production potential, the variety may be recommended for areas with low rainfall.

In West Godavari district, Dwarakatirumala mandal, Thimmapuram tank village and Thirumala tank village permanent pandals for vegetable production and area expansion of tissue culture banana were promoted under APIIATP. Farmers who have adopted permanent pandal system for vegetable cultivation are quite happy with the benefits they realised in terms of increased production and income. Further, farmers have observed other benefits such as vegetables in good shape, less occurrence of diseases, ease of weeding operations,

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

a greater number of pickings etc. Farmers have reported approx. Rs.10,000 – Rs.14000 more income per acre for one vegetable crops under permanent pandal cultivation when compare to traditional practice. In general, farmer is cultivating 3-4 vegetable crops in a year when irrigation is assured. In that case, he is getting not less than Rs. 30,000 to Rs.40,000 additional income from vegetables grown under pandal system. Looking at the befits, a greater number of farmers from that tank village and nearby villages are showing interest towards vegetable cultivation under pandal system.

Permanent pandal erected in Mr. Achant Gandhi’s fieldinTimmapuram village, Dwarakatirumalamandal, West Godavari

5.10 Suggestions and Recommendations

Monitoring team has noticed slow progress under APIIATP in the current reporting period due to the budget constraints in the initial months and unexpected Covid-19 pandemic situation. Capacity building programme could not be conducted due to existing Covid-19 pandemic situations. However, identification of beneficiaries for the approved components is under progress.

Based on the observations during the field visit and looking at the progress of the APIIATP, Monitoringteam felt that more initiatives can be taken up provided the project budget is released in time and as per the budget proposed. Sometimes, due to delay in transferring of input subsidy to the beneficiaries under DBT system, farmers are losing confidence on the project and are hesitating to participate in project activities. Department staff is also finding it difficult in mobilizing the beneficiaries as the project share will be transferred to beneficiary account only on a reimbursement basis. Team has noticed poor coordination and communication between the line departments at district level. It is an utmost important to work in convergence and coordination approach among the implementing agencies at district level. There seems to be no review meetings/ sharing of work progress at regular intervals between department of Agriculture/Horticulture and Irrigation department. Monthly review meetings among the line

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

departments help to address some of the obstacles and ensure timely intervention with quality assurance.

Monitoring team also noticed that the agriculture and horticulture trainings are being conducted without the notice of DPU. There is a need to discourage such practices.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

B2 Sub-component

Chapter.6

Climate Smart Aquaculture Production

6.1 Introduction

The objective of the component is to enhance inland fish production, improve post-harvest management and strengthen market linkages. Out of 364 project tanks in the first phase, 112 minor irrigation tanks have been identified suitable to take up fish culture. The Govt.of Andhra Pradesh have released an amount of Rs.376.73 lakhs for fisheries sector in the Vote on account budget 2020-21 and orders were issued dated 28.4.2020. Out of this, Rs.201.50 lakhs are allocated for civil works .

6.2 Civil works:

The project has the provision to provide 100% assistance for civil works. The execution of civil works is taken up by Water Resource Department and administrative approvals is accorded by the project authorities. The Dept. of Fisheries is involved regarding fisheries technical aspects. The civil works are taken up for augmenting the fish seed production and for supplying the fish in hygienic condition.

(a) Quality fish seed production: Administrative approvals were given for establishment of one Fresh water fish Brood bank at B. Matham, YSR Kadapa district, for 2 fish seed farms at Kavali in SPSR Nellore and Nandyal in Kurnool districts for construction of 37 captive seed nurseries in four districts ( i.e., 14 nurseries in East Godavari, 8 in SPSR Nellore, 3 in Anantapur , 10 nurseries in Kurnool and 2 in Visakhapatnam districts). To expedite the works, orders were also issued to entrust the civil works up to Rs.5 lakhs each to the concerned water Users Association, wherever Feasible.

(b) Construction of fish landing centres: It is planned to construct two fish landing centres, i.e., one in Ananatapur and other one in Prakasham district. The estimates have been prepared are under scrutiny. 6.3 Innovative Fish culture Methods: Tanks in the project are being identified for stocking of freshwater prawn juveniles by procuring the juveniles from the hatcheries, to increase the income of for the fishermen.

6.4 Supply of fishing inputs to the fishermen: Identification of beneficiary fishermen for supply of fishing inputs like boats and nets, two-wheeler mopeds with ice box etc., is under progress. The Dept. of Fisheries has furnished proposal for establishment of 7 fish retail outlets.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

6.5 Creating infrastructure facilities:

The administrative approval was accorded for providing equipment for aqua lab at Vizianagaram town. Similarly, administrative approval was accorded for construction of one ice plant at Kavali, SPSR Nellore district and proposal for Mini fish processing plant in SRSP Nellore district is under scrutiny.

6.6 Capacity Building:

The orientation training programs have been organised in 7 project districts for the staff / officials of fishery dept. and fishers to enhance their understanding on the project, its activities, execution strategy and expected outcomes.

Table 6.1 : Fishery Plan and Progress Overview SN Activities Planned Progress & Remarks Units A Civil Works Administrative Approval accorded for Establishment fish Brood bank 3 1 at Brahmamgari matham Modernization/Upgrading fish farms 15 2 At Kavali and Nandyal Establishment of Captive fish seed 37 East Godavary-14, Nellore-8, Ananatapur- nurseries 3, Kurnool-10 and Visakhapatnam-2 TOTAL -37. Construction of Fish Landing centres 12 Anantapur -1 and Prakasham-1. Both are under scrutiny B Fish Culture Promotion of fish culture in Cages 2 Identification of tanks and obtaining the fish culture in Pens resolutions of FCs for stocking the Demonstration of fish culture in 2000 freshwater prawn juveniles in the tanks is ponds,canals under progress, Stocking of Fresh Water prawn 1000 juveniles (in Lakh no.s) C Supply of Inputs Supply of Boat with nets. Identification of beneficiaries for supply of other fishing inputs is under progress; Supply of 2 wheelers, ice box Establishment of kiosk (fish retail Kiosks-Fish Retail outlets: Proposals outlet) / Nutri-carts) received for 7 units ; Rs.63.00 lakhs. Under scrutiny D Processing / Value Addition Infrastructure Providing equipment to Aqua lab 3 Administrative approval given for One Aqualab, Vizianagaram for Rs. 7.76 lakhs. Establishment of mini fish 1 Proposal received for mini processing plant processing plant in SRSP Nellore district with an outlay of Rs.25 lakhs. Under scrutiny Establishment of ice plant 1 Administrative approval was given for 1 ice plant for Rs.37.50 lakhs assistance under the project .

E Capacity Building Training to fishermen and staff, 250 Under progress exposure visits, studies

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Component-C

Chapter.7

Post-Harvest Management, Market And Agri Business Promotion

7.1 Introduction

This component aims to enhance the profitability for the farmers by improving their access to markets through bringing-in producers and consumers closer for locally produced goods by enhancing market penetration and developing alternate marketing channels which improve farm level post-harvest management and value addition. The project will utilize the FPOs, wherever feasible, as the base of the village and cluster of villages or at a super-cluster at cascade level. This component will help the farmers to realize a greater return to their products through value chain improvement and supply chain management.

The specific objectives of promoting agribusiness are;

1. Improve market linkage through collectivization and product aggregation;

2. To improve the return to farmers and its organisation (FPO) through value addition;

3. Improve accessibility of farmer’s collectives to agribusiness services;

4. Strengthen post-harvest management and supply chain through infrastructures, facility and services

As part of third concurrent monitoring, M&E team interacted with the district level officers of Dept. of Agriculture and Dept. of Horticulture to discuss the project implementation status under the component C and to understand the underlying issues with respect to the project implementation if any.

Due to Covid-19 pandemic situation, not much field level implementation of project interventions/infrastructure is noticed in the current assessment period. However, the Tank Development Planning under component C of APIIATP is in progress. It is learnt that cascade Development Planning will be done once the guidelines of the same is finalized. Recently appointed Village Agriculture Assistants (VAAs) and Village Horticulture Assistants (VHAs) are of great help for the smooth implementation of the project at ground level. They are the functionaries working at tank level. Orientation training to VAAs/VHAs on APIIATP is planned by dept. of Agriculture in this financial year 2020-21.

7.2 Implementation Status of Agribusiness Activities

i. Hiring of ABSO: Agri business Support Organisation (ABSO) Contract Awarded by Commissioner & Director of Agriculture to Director General, National Institute of Agriculture Extension Management (MANAGE) and MOU executed for supply and value chain analysis, providing market intelligence and Export direct linkages with FPOs.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

ii. Formation and Promotion of FPOs: Component C supports strengthening Farmer Producer Organisations / Companies (FPO / FPC) for agribusiness promotion and market linkages of different agricultural and horticultural commodities. As per the initial assessment, there are 177 FPOs existing in the area of 228 tanks, out of 651 project tanks. These FPOs are formed by different agencies such as

a. NABARD - 21 b. SERP - 93 c. ICRISAT - 1 d. Dept. of Agri. - 9 and e. Dept. of Horti. - 53

iii. The Line departments are requested to verify the status of FPOs and categorize them under working active / normal / dormant and also inform the infrastructure created with the FPOs. In the year 2020-21, it is proposed to further strengthen 41 FPOs in 10 districts at a cost of 212 Lakhs. As of now, 15 FPOs were identified for further strengthening by department of Horticulture.

Monitoring team has come across FPOs in Krishna district (LBT tank area in Borragudem&Rudravaram villages); in Nellore district (in sample tank area in Vanjivika village; in West Godawari district (sample tank area in Lakshmigudem, Manchulavarigudem&Tirumalapalem LBT tank villages) for cashew processing.

iv. Training and Capacity Building: During the current assessment period, capacity building training and exposure visits were organised for FPOs where 525 farmers of 15 existing FPOs on post-harvest management, market and agribusiness promotion and conducted exposure visits to get the remunerative price to farmers at state level and District level against the target to impart training to 25 FPOs covering 905 FPO farmers. Along with the farmers including women farmers, respective area officials such as ADHs, HOs, Cooperative Officers, KVK scientists, NGO representatives, FPO board directors, APDs, VAAs, VHAs are also participating in the training programs wherever conducted under APIIATP.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

v. Rural godowns: To strengthen smooth transition of commodities and supply chain management, 21 sites have been identified for construction of rural godowns. Administrative approval has been accorded to 8 godowns and design and estimate of 4 units are under scrutiny. vi. Storage Structures: Construction of one low cost onion storage structure in Mandlem village, Jupadu Bungalow in Kurnool district was completed in 2018-19. It has a capacity to store 50MT of onion. The total cost of the onion storage structure was Rs. 3,90,000, of which Rs. 2,62,500 was supported under the APIITP.

Besides, one turmeric storage structure in Thajangi village in Chintapallimandalin Visakhapatnam district was also completed through a FPO named Andhra Kaashmir Tribal Farming & Marketing Producer Company. The total cost of the turmeric storage structure was Rs. 3,20,500 of which Rs. 2,40,375 was supported under APIIATP. The turmeric storage structure is expected to benefit 119 farmers in the FPO. Utilization of these storage structures by farmers is about to initiate.

Photo: Low cost onion storage structure constructed in Mandlem village, Jupadu Bungalow mandal inKurnool district.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Photo: Low cost storage structure for turmeric is constructed in Thajangi village in Chintapallimandalin Visakhapatnam district.

vii. Rural Market: Rural Market facility is in completion stage in Budathanapalli village in Gantyadamandal of Vizianagaram district, through FPO named ‘Pragath iUdyana mariyu vyavasaya anubhanda vutpathidarula paraspara sahayaka sahakarasangam (PU-VPSS)’.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

viii. Transport vehicle: Provided 2 transport vehicles, one for a FPO named ‘PUVPSS’in Vizianagaram district for mango transportation and one vehicle to a FPO named ‘Nakkapalli Agri. &Horti. Farmers’ Producer Co. Ltd’in Visakhapatnam districtto transport coconuts.

Photo: Transportation vehicle provided to Nakkapalli Agri. &Horti. Farmers’ Producer Co. Ltd’) in Visakhapatnam district.

ix. Cashew processing unit:Two Cashew processing units construction is under progress through a FPO named ‘Adivasi Cashew Farmers Producers Cooperative Society Limited’, located in Buttaigudem village and mandal in West Godavari district.And the other unit is under construction through a FPO named “JeelugumilliCashewnut Producer Company Ltd’ in the same location. These two units is expected to benefit more than 2000 farmers under 13 tanks.

x. Supply of secondary processing units: Regarding supply of secondary processing units to FPO farmers, 32 potential WUAs identified, orientation training was provided, specification of units finalized by agriculture department. All the JDAs in the state identified the targeted villages to procure and operate the secondary processing units on custom hiring basis, procurement method of DBT: direct benefit transfer is under examination and finalization of empanelment of suppliers towards the suppliers of these machinery are pending with Department of Agriculture.

xi. Common Interest Group (CIG):32 Common / Farmer Interest Groups (CIGs /FIGs) have been identified for taking up feasible secondary processing units, like mini dal mill, rice mill, flour mill, chilly mill, turmeric mill, oil expellers with motors and wheat processing units. Empanelment of suppliers is under progress by commissioner and director of agriculture. During the field visit, monitoring team has come across 3 CIGs formed by department of Agril. for running an oil expeller units in Mandalem village in Kurnool district. The process is in progress.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Issues And Suggestions For Improvement

Monitoring has noticed a clear communication gap between the state project team and district implementing authority within the department, due to which the progress under the project is impaired. Till date the state implementing authority has not finalized the list of machinery supplier companies and purchasing rates. Hence, not much progress is noticed under the agribusiness component. Further, the agribusiness guidelines are also changing , frequently and the changes are not being communicated to district implementing authority time to time. There is an urgent need to bring down the communication gap through regular review meeting either monthly or bi- monthly.

World Bank Mission visit to project area:

On 18th February 2020, the World Bank team comprising of subject experts from agriculture, agribusiness, fisheries, environment, hydrology, finance etc along with the Special Project Director of APIIATP and PMU team had visited APIIATP project area in Nellore district. World Bank team interacted with the CEO of PragathiYuvaKendram, a FPO and also the member farmers of the FPO atLeguntapadu village near Nellore. The mission team has discussed over the infrastructure and market support requirements of the FPO and possibilities of fulfilling the same under APIIATP was discussed with SPD.

World Bank experts’ team during the mission, visitedLeguntapadu village near Nellore and interacted with the farmers of ‘PragathiYuvaKendram’ a FPO to understand their requirements and the support the FPO availed under the APIIATP,

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Component D:

Chapter -8

Project Management and Capacity Building

8.1 Establishment of Project Management Unit/s:

Effective execution of the project is ensured with the establishment of a Project Management Unit (PMU) at State level and District Project Management Unit (DPMU) in each of the project district (12 project districts). Observations during discussion with different stakeholders are presented below.

1. Engagements of five (5) support organisations are under process, it will be finalized soon. 2. The documentation and submission of bills to the treasury found to be burdensome and its simplification would be helpful to reduce the time involved in the process;

3. Mobility of APDs to the project sites / tank area has been a constraint. For example, on an average tank distance is 100 km and above in Vijayanagaram, Kurnool and Ananthapur. Provision of mobility for the APDs would be helpful for regular follow-up and rendering on time guidance;

4. For social audit board painting, Rs. 2,000.00 has been fixed. The budgeted amount reported to be low for which local painters do not show interest to take up the task.

5. It has been difficult to adhere to the capacity building plan in a Pandemic situation. Farmers are not willing to participate in the training program which requires gathering. Based on the learning, earlier stipulated targets need to be revised accordingly. For example, 154 batches of training were planned in Krishna district, but achievement has been below satisfaction so far due to govt. regulations and people’s hesitation to gather for training. During last financial year, trainings have been completed for only 22 batchers in the same district. So, a feasible and implementable revised plan may be prepared for all the project components / sub-components, including capacity building plan, considering the current pandemic situation.

6. All APDs are opined that regular PMU visits give support and clarity on implementation of the programmes effectively.

7. APDs are not reimbursed 1 to 2 years TA bills across the state, need action on it.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

8.2. Trainings

8.1 Trainings were organised to WRD staff Hydrological Viability Analysis- Protocol and Methodology -GIS.

District Venue Date No. of participants Srikakulam, Vijayanagarm and FTC. Vijayanagaram 31.1.2020 54 Vishakapatnam East & West Godavari and Krishana APSAC office. Vijayawada 3.2.2020 31 Districts Kadapa,Kurnool and Nellore JD office. Kadapa 5.2.2020 29

Chittoor, Nellore and Prakasham Agriculture Research Station. 6.2.2020 30 Nellore

8.3 Workshop/meeting with DPDs/APDs and SOs

The State Project Director has orgnised review cum planning workshop with the DPDs, APDs and SOs of all the districts on Project Interventions in the mo nth of February 2020.Progress and performance of the SOs and APDs have been discussed during the programme.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Chapter -9

Socio-Economic Profile of sample households

9.0 Introduction

The present chapter primarily deals with the socioeconomic profile of sample households in the project area duly comparing them with control areas. The main emphasis was on socioeconomic features, such as class and community composition of the sample households, literacy, employment position, income from different sources, expenditure, asset possession of both agriculture and livestock, status of living and finally the level of indebtedness of the project vis-à- vis control households in the surveyed tanks. This would help to assess the project impact on the profile of the stakeholders at different phases in the study region under the following sub heads.

9.1 Selected Sample Farmers in the Study Area

As already pointed in the methodology chapter-1, the total selected sample farmers are from 59 tanks spread over 12 districts constituting 875 households in the study area. The data is collected as per the approved study tools. The data is tabulated in excel sheet and the analysis is carried out as per the objectives. The households selected from control area were 177 from 12 non- project tanks which formed the basis for comparison of different socio-economic characteristics with that of project situations. The sample 875 households details are given in annexure -9.1

9.2 Classification of Sample Farmers According to Landholdings Status

The sample households, thus, selected are classified according to the economic groups as marginal, small, medium and large farmers based on size of the land holdings and are presented in Table .9.1.

Table No 9.1 : Classification of Sample Farmers According to Landholdings Status S. No Category % control % Project Acres %Control %Project

0-1 33 27 1 Marginal 63 57 1-2 31 30

2-3 11 15

2 Small 28 30 3-4 10 9 4-5 7 6

5-6 3 4

3 Medium 7 8 6-7 1 2

7-8 2 2

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

S. No Category % control % Project Acres %Control %Project

8-9 1 1

9-10 1 0

4 Large 2 5 10 Above 2 5

A perusal of Table 9.1 shows that more than 90 per cent of the sample constitutes marginal and small farmers in control tanks whereas it is 87 percent in project tanks. Medium and large farmers together constitute 9% and 13% in control and sample tanks respectively. Details are given in annexure 9.2

9.3 Classification of Household According to Social categories

As indicated in Table 9.2, the project has 9% ST population while there is only 2% ST population in the control group. With the SC population, the control group and project group has a 11% and 8% respectively. The backward caste population is 34% and 49% in control and project groups respectively. While the percentage of forward caste is 34% of total sample in the project group it is 53% in the control group. The representation of SC and ST population is observed as low in the project group. The details are given in annexure 9.3

Table No. 9.2. Distribution of Sample Respondents According to their Caste Group Category %SC %ST %BC %Others

Control 11 2 34 53

Project 8 9 49 34

9.4 Demographics of the Households 9.4.1 Respondents gender

Of the 875 respondents, including both control and project, the male respondents were more accessible during the discussions, i.e., 88% where as women are limited to 12%. In the control group, the women respondents were more, i.e., 14% while in the project the women respondents were limited to 12%. The following graph indicates respondents’ gender.

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

9.4.2 Family size

The average household size of the sample is 3.9. There is a slight variation between project and control. The average family size of state is 3.9 and the sample is also same as that of state average. The males outnumbered the females in project as well as control areas. The ratio of female to male in both project and control areas was 88.7 and 88.7 respectively which indicates less than that of the state average. The details are given in the table No. 9.3.1

Table No. 9.3.1 Household members’ gender SN Particulars Total Project Control 1 No of households 875 177 698

2 Males 1797 359 1438

3 Females 1594 319 1275

4 Total population 3391 678 2713

5 Average household size 3.86 3.83 3.89

6 Sex ratio 88.7 88.7 88.7

9.4.3 Respondents’ age

A large part of the respondents fell in the age groups of 40-59 and they are 42% and 46% in control and project groups respectively. The respondents in the age group 60-79are 36% and 33% in the control and project groups respectively. The other respondents with other age groups are given in the following table.

Table 9.3.2 Summary of Respondents age in both control and project tanks Percentage Project/Control Total <20 20-39 40-59 60-79 80-100 Total

CONTROL 177 0.0 18.6 41.8 35.6 4.0 100

PROJECT 698 0.3 15.2 45.7 32.5 6.3 100

9.4.4 Household members’ age

In the respondents households, the major share of household members is adults in both the control and project groups. In the control group, 0-20 years population group formed about 7% of

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

the population and in the project households, members of the same age group formed about 9% of the population. In both the control and project groups, 40-59 age group population occupies second position with 24 and 26 percent respectively. The adults with the age group 20-39 are found to be 68% and 64% in control and project groups respectively. The summary is given in the following table.

Table 9.3.3 Summary of Respondents age in both control and project tanks Percentage (%) Category Total <20 20-39 40-59 60-79 80-100 Control 6.80 68.36 23.73 1.13 0.00 100

Project 9.31 64.18 25.79 0.72 0.00 100

9.4.5 Literacy status of sample households

The literacy levels of the respondents are presented in the table below. More than 70 percent of the respondents in both control and project tanks have primary education. Respondents with secondary education in control and project tanks are 14 and 17 percent respectively. And the rest have tertiary education.

Table/Graph 9.3.4 Summary of Respondents literacy levels Numbers % Sample Category Primary Secondary Tertiary Primary Secondary Tertiary

Control 140 25 12 79.1 14.1 6.8

Project 529 116 53 75.8 16.6 7.6

Coming to the percentage of education levels among households of respondents, data indicate very different trends compared to respondents’ literacy levels. The literacy levels of respondents family members are more or less similar in both project and control groups. Majority of the family members (nearly 50% of the sample) have secondary education followed by primary and tertiary education. The summary is given the following table.

Table/Graph 9.3.5 Summary of literacy levels of sample households Numbers % Sample Category Primary Secondary Tertiary Primary Secondary Tertiary 152 250 113 29.5 48.5 21.9 Control

Project 563 1003 518 27.0 48.1 24.9

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

9.5 Employment status of sample respondents and household members

It is observed from the below graph that the primary occupation of majority of respondents is agriculture with 88 and 91 percent in control and project tanks respectively. The rest of the respondents have other occupations such as agriculture labour, livestock etc.,

Table: 9.3.6 Summary of Respondents Employment status Numbers Percentage (%) Employment options Control Project Control Project

Agriculture 155 637 87.6 91.3

Agril labour 6 28 3.4 4.0

Livestock 2 18 1.1 2.6

Industrial labour 0 2 0.0 0.3

Govt/Private employee 0 5 0.0 0.7

Others 14 8 7.9 1.1

9.5.1 Employment Status of Household Members.

The primary occupation of the household members of control and project group is agriculture with 69% and 65% respectively followed by others such as livestock, agriculture labour and private jobs etc., It is noticed that the primary occupations of the household members are close in both control and project tanks.

Table: 9.3.7 Primary Occupation of household members Numbers Percentage (%) Primary Occupation Control Project Control Project

Agriculture 166 623 69.2 66.4

Agril labour 18 67 7.5 7.1

Livestock 34 158 14.2 16.8

Industrial labour 1 5 0.4 0.5

Govt/Private employee 19 68 7.9 7.2

Others 2 17 0.8 1.8

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

9.6 Asset Possession of Households

Asset possession of households is one of the indices considered while evaluating the economic status. In the present study, an attempt has been made to assess the assets owned. Majority of households i.e., 72% in control and 66% in project group possessed pucca houses. The share of Kutcha houses is quite low in the range of 1% to 2%, which is a positive indicator towards development. Average value of house possessed by control group is Rs. 5,76,329 which is almost the same with the project group where the average stood at Rs. 5,77,621.

In the state, housing data projects healthy results, 91 percentage of the households have pucca houses (permanent structure). Though the farm size is less, it does not have much impact on housing. It was reported that marginal and small farmers benefited from govt housing schemes. Very small number of semi pucca (9%) and negligible number of Kutcha houses (1%) have been witnessed predominantly in the project area. District wise possession of house details are given in annexure 9.4 The summary of landholding wise possession of type of houses are given in the table below

Table No. 9.4 Landholding wise and housing type - % Percentage (%) Large Type of Total Total Marginal Small Medium Category house Houses Houses (%) (10 and (upto 2) (2-5) (5-10) above)

Pucca 128 72.3 50.4 37.2 10.2 2.2

Semi CONTROL 45 25.4 67.3 28.8 3.8 0.0 Pucca

Kutcha 4 2.3 75.0 25.0 0.0 0.0

CONTROL Total 177 100.0 60.5 28.8 9.0 1.7

Pucca 459 65.8 3.3 43.1 10.7 42.9

Semi PROJECT 230 33.0 4.3 76.5 10.9 8.3 Pucca

Kutcha 9 1.3 55.6 44.4 0.0 0.0

PROJECT Total 698 100.0 4.3 54.2 10.6 30.9

An attempt has been made to assess the assets owned by different categories of households such as marginal, small, medium and large farmers. There is a variation in possessions of household articles such as TV and phones by project and control group. On an average, each house hold has one or more cell phones and each household has TV. It is observed that the marginal farmers in both the control and project areas own more household articles. It has also been observed that project group owned more computers and internet connections than control group.

Table No 9.5. Household items(%) Item CONTROL PROJECT

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Large Large Marginal Small Medium Marginal Small Medium (10 and Total (10 and Total (upto 2) (2-5) (5-10) (upto 2) (2-5) (5-10) above) above) Telephone / 58.4 29.2 10.4 1.9 100.0 50.6 32.8 11.6 5.0 100.0 Cellphone Television 58.1 30.0 10.0 1.9 100.0 52.4 31.6 11.6 4.4 100.0

Computer / 33.3 66.7 0.0 0.0 100.0 42.9 9.5 42.9 4.8 100.0 Laptop Internet 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 40.9 18.2 22.7 18.2 100.0 connection Refrigerator 54.9 37.3 5.9 2.0 100.0 44.1 33.3 14.4 8.1 100.0

Washing 62.5 12.5 25.0 0.0 100.0 37.2 34.9 14.0 14.0 100.0 Machine Bicycle 47.2 38.9 11.1 2.8 100.0 44.8 31.5 14.4 9.4 100.0

Two-wheeler 47.6 33.3 15.5 3.6 100.0 45.5 33.4 13.9 7.1 100.0

Four-wheeler 42.9 28.6 28.6 0.0 100.0 25.8 41.9 12.9 19.4 100.0

Others 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 100.0

9.7 Possession of agriculture assets

The data reveals that the possession of agricultural assets such as tractor, power tiller, plough, bullock carts, seed drills, cultivators, pudlers is popular in both control and project areas. The high value (in terms of money) implements such as tractors, power tillers, cultivators are owned by all categories of farmers. The district wise household assets are given in Annexure 9.6 A,B.

Table No. 9.6 : Agriculture implements(%)

Control PROJECT S.No Agri Implement 10 Above Up-to 2 2-5 5-10 Total Up-to 2 2-5 5-10 Total Above 10

1 Tractor 58.4 29.2 10.4 1.9 100.0 50.6 32.8 11.6 5.0 100.0

2 Power Triller 58.1 30.0 10.0 1.9 100.0 52.4 31.6 11.6 4.4 100.0

3 Bullock cart 33.3 66.7 0.0 0.0 100.0 42.9 9.5 42.9 4.8 100.0

4 Plough 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 40.9 18.2 22.7 18.2 100.0

5 Seed Drill 54.9 37.3 5.9 2.0 100.0 44.1 33.3 14.4 8.1 100.0

6 Pudler 62.5 12.5 25.0 0.0 100.0 37.2 34.9 14.0 14.0 100.0

7 Weeder 47.2 38.9 11.1 2.8 100.0 44.8 31.5 14.4 9.4 100.0

8 Cultivator 47.6 33.3 15.5 3.6 100.0 45.5 33.4 13.9 7.1 100.0

9 Sprayer 42.9 28.6 28.6 0.0 100.0 25.8 41.9 12.9 19.4 100.0

10 Oil Engine 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 100.0

9.8 Possession of milch animals

The native breeds are popular both in the control as well as project areas. In control tanks 29% of the households possess native buffalo breed while it is 38% in project tanks. Similarly, 27% of

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

households in control tanks possess native cow breed which is 19% in project tanks. Only 1% of the households possesses improved breeds both in the cases of buffalos and cows in both control and project groups. The district wise details are given in Annexure 9.7

9.9 Household income

Having analysed per household income in the surveyed areas, it is worthwhile to assess the per capita income. The main source of income is agriculture in both control and project tanks which is followed by wages both in project control tanks group. Income from non ayacut area is also significant in both control and project tanks. The dairy also supplements the household income which is almost equal in both project and control tanks.

The summary is given in the following table. The details are given in Annexure 9.8

Table 9.7 Percentage of Income sources in control and project areas

Percentage (%) Gross Income Category Control Project

Agriculture - from Ayacut and Influence zone area 41 50

Wages 18 15

Agriculture - from NonAyacut area 10 9

Service(Govt/ Private) 10 10

Other Income 9 5

Dairy own animals 9 10

Dairy commission 1 0

Animals/ Poultry 1 0

Artisan 1 0

Leasing out land 1 1

Total 100 100

9.10 Consumption pattern (Expenditure)

The data on annual per household expenditure is described in the following graph, the major expenditure in both control and project tanks is on education followed by food. The expenditure on health, the payment of interest charges for the amount they borrowed is significant in both control and project areas. Following graph gives comparative summary of percentage expenditure in both control and project areas. The district wise details are given in annexure 9.9

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

9.11 Borrowings

The data on source-wise borrowings by households presented in the table shows that percentage of borrowings from the bank is 52 and 57 in control and project areas respectively. The second major source of borrowings is SHG followed by friends in both control and project areas. The cooperatives are also lending money to its member farmers, it is relatively more in project area. Money lenders and traders are also lending money. It is observed that no one is borrowing from micro finance. The following table summarizes the sources of borrowings in control and project areas as a comparison. The district wise details are given in Annexure 9.10

Table 9.8 Percentage- Source of Borrowings% Cooperative Money Micro Sample Type Banks SHGs Friends Traders Others societies lenders finance 52 1 8 6 4 0 0 0 CONTROL

PROJECT 57 4 22 6 1 0 0 2

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Annexure 1: Visited House Hold of Concurrent Monintoring-3 Villages

District S.No Type Mandal Village Tank Name 1 Sample D.Hirehal Mallikethi (Palakurthi) Mallikethi MI 2 Sample Vidapanakal hawaligi Hawaligi 3 Sample - LBT Anantapur Gunthakal Y T Cheruvu Yerrathimmarayala 4 Sample - LBT Singanamal Singanamala Sri Rangarajan 5 Control Roddam Seshapuram Seshapuram 1 Sample B. Kodur B. Kodur B. Kodur 2 Sample Badvel Puttayapalli Puttayapalli 3 Sample - LBT Kadapa B. Koduru M. Narasimhapuram Narasimha Puram 4 Sample - LBT Badvel Boyalavaripalli Chenampalli 5 Control Badvel Venkatasettipalli Venkatasettipalli 1 Sample - LBT Mylavaram Borragudem Borragudem 2 Sample - LBT Reddigudem Rudravaram Peddha 3 Sample Krishna Visannapet Kalagara Kundapalem 4 Sample Visannapet Narasapuram Kanthamma 5 Control Reddigudem Raghavapuram Rangapuram Peddha 1 Sample Jupadu Bungalow Mandlem Mandlem 2 Sample Kowtalam Valluru Valluru MI 3 Sample - LBT Kurnool Rudravaram Chanduluru Gangireddy Pr Cheruvu 4 Sample - LBT Rudravaram Perur Vavilala Perur Cheruvu 5 Control Rudravaram Chilakaluru Chennareddy Cheruvu 1 Sample Dagadarthi Dundigam Dundigam 2 Sample Kota Vanjivaka Vanjivaka Daruvu 3 Sample - LBT Nellore Ananthasagaram Ananthasagar Ananthasagaram 4 Sample - LBT Kavali Kothapalli Kothapalli 5 Control Kavali Budama Kunta Budama Kunta 1 Sample peddaraveedu Bodireddy palli 2 Sample Turlapadu Tumalacheruvu Tumalacheruvu MI Prakasha 3 Sample - LBT m Kondepi Kattavaripallem Kondepi 4 Sample - LBT Martur Rajupallem Rajupallem 5 Control Tangutur Valluru Valluru 1 Sample Amadalavalasa Ramachandra Puram Sagaram 2 Sample Etcherla Kuppili Kotha Srikakula 3 Sample - LBT m Burja Singannapalem Singanna 4 Sample - LBT Pathapatnam R L Puram Peddha 5 Control Echerla Kupili Ura 1 Sample Cheepurupalle Devarapodilam Jayakara 2 Sample Srungavarapukota Chintada Namassivaya Vizianagar 3 Sample - LBT am Vizianagaram Gunkalam Peddha 4 Sample - LBT G L Puram Dumangi Kirandal Reservear 5 Control Gurla Gurla Muppana Banda 1 Sample Gandepalle Gandepalle Raju 2 Sample Rajaomangi Jaddangi Venkatareddy dora East 3 Sample - LBT Godavari Jaggampeta Ramavaram Mutyalamma Cheruvu 4 Sample - LBT Yeleswaram Yerravaram Nallatammayyacheruvu 5 Control Jaggampeta Narendrapatnam Venkateswara Cheruvu 1 Sample West Buttaigudem Lakshmugudem Desalavarikattu 2 Sample Godavari Buttaigudem Manchulavarigudem Allicalava

- 1 -

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

District S.No Type Mandal Village Tank Name 3 Sample - LBT Dwaraka Tirumala Thimmapurm Venkatadhri Cheruvu

4 Sample - LBT Dwaraka Tirumala Thirumala Palem Gollavanni Cheruvu 5 Control Dwaraka Tirumala Line Gopalapuram Jammi Cheruvu 1 Sample Varadaiahpalem Kambakam Kambakam Big 2 Sample Varadaiahpalem Thondambattu Thondambattu Big Nallavenkataya Garri Chittoor 3 Sample - LBT Chittoor Palli Nalla Venkataya Gari Palli 4 Sample - LBT G. D Nellore Veeraka Nellore Veeraka Nellore Big 5 Control Puthala Pattu Dhamanda Palli Reddy 1 Sample - LBT Anandapuram Peddipalem Dattapucheruvu 2 Sample - LBT Arakuveli Similigooda Similigooda Visakhapat Pala Gedda 3 Sample nam Golugonda Kottayellavaram Anicut(Rachakattu 4 Sample Padmanabham Korada Krishnam Raju 5 Control Anandapuram Podugupalem Marri Cheruvu

- 2 -

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Annexure 2.1 Ayacutdars District wise

% Land Land owing Land owning % Land owning Total Male Female Total owing Male Female Ayacutdars District Ayacutdars Ayacutdars Ayacutdars Ayacutdars Ayacutdars %

2496 963 3459 72% 28% 100% Anantapuram

Chittoor 805 290 1095 74% 26% 100%

East godavari 423 228 651 65% 35% 100%

Kadapa 878 281 1159 76% 24% 100% krishna 1107 252 1359 81% 19% 100%

Kurnool 712 149 861 83% 17% 100%

Nellore 2658 896 3554 75% 25% 100%

Prakasam 907 292 1199 76% 24% 100%

Srikakulam 410 56 466 88% 12% 100%

Visakhapatnam 709 78 787 90% 10% 100%

Vizianagaram 592 227 819 72% 28% 100%

West godavari 346 137 483 72% 28% 100%

Total 12043 3849 15892 76% 24% 100%

- 3 -

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Annexure 2.2 Various Uses of Tanks and Number of Users

Use Uses Users % Uses % Users

Domestic use 2 240 1% 1%

Drinking water supply 6 3580 4% 15%

Fisheries 27 1265 20% 5%

Washing Clothes 31 361 23% 2%

Cattle Grazing 57 17910 42% 76%

Pottery 5 63 4% 0%

Brick making 4 31 3% 0%

Others 3 190 2% 1%

Total 135 23640 100% 100%

- 4 -

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Annexure 2.3 Water to Tail End farmers - District wise

Sample Type District Number of Tanks % of Tanks Total Tanks

Not receiving Sluices Closed Receiving Not receiving Sluices Closed water Permanently water water Permanently Receiving water

Control Anantapuram 1 100% 1 Chittoor 1 100% 1 East godavari 1 100% 1 Kadapa 1 100% 1 krishna 1 100% 1 Kurnool 1 100% 1 Nellore 1 100% 1 Prakasam 1 100% 1 Srikakulam 1 100% 1 Visakhapatnam 1 100% 1 Vizianagaram 1 100% 1 West godavari 1 100% 1 Control sub total 6 2 4 50% 17% 33% 12 Project Anantapuram 3 1 75% 25% 4 Chittoor 1 3 25% 75% 4 East godavari 1 3 25% 75% 4 Kadapa 1 3 25% 75% 4 krishna 3 1 75% 25% 4 Kurnool 2 2 50% 50% 4 Nellore 2 2 50% 50% 4

0 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Sample Type District Number of Tanks % of Tanks Total Tanks

Not receiving Sluices Closed Receiving Not receiving Sluices Closed water Permanently water water Permanently Receiving water Prakasam 2 2 50% 50% 4 Srikakulam 3 1 75% 25% 4 Visakhapatnam 4 100% 4 Vizianagaram 4 100% 4 West godavari 2 2 50% 50% 4 Project sub total 27 3 18 56% 6% 38% 48 Total 33 5 22 55% 8% 37% 60

1 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Annexure 2.4 Number of Shortfalls in Last Five Years - Control Vs Project tanks comparison- District wise

Number of tanks % of tanks Sample Total District % Tanks Type 2 3 4 5 No 1 2 3 4 5 Tanks No Shortfalls 1 Year years Years years Years Shortfalls Year years Years years Years

Control Anantapuram 1 100% 1 100%

Chittoor 1 100% 1 100%

East godavari 1 100% 1 100%

Kadapa 1 100% 1 100%

krishna 1 100% 1 100%

Kurnool 1 100% 1 100%

Nellore 1 100% 1 100%

Prakasam 1 100% 1 100%

Srikakulam 1 100% 1 100% Visakhapatna m 1 100% 1 100%

Vizianagaram 1 100% 1 100%

West godavari 1 100% 1 100% Control Sub total 0 2 3 1 3 3 0 17% 25% 8% 25% 25% 12 100%

Project Anantapuram 1 2 1 25% 50% 25% 4 100%

Chittoor 2 1 1 50% 25% 25% 4 100%

East godavari 3 1 75% 25% 4 100%

Kadapa 4 100% 4 100%

krishna 1 3 25% 75% 4 100%

Kurnool 1 3 25% 75% 4 100%

2 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Number of tanks % of tanks Sample Total District % Tanks Type 2 3 4 5 No 1 2 3 4 5 Tanks No Shortfalls 1 Year years Years years Years Shortfalls Year years Years years Years

Nellore 2 2 50% 50% 4 100%

Prakasam 2 2 50% 50% 4 100%

Srikakulam 2 1 1 50% 25% 25% 4 100% Visakhapatna m 2 2 50% 50% 4 100%

Vizianagaram 4 100% 4 100%

West godavari 3 1 75% 25% 4 100% Project Sub total 12 0 15 8 4 9 25% 0 31% 17% 8% 19% 48 100%

Total 12 2 18 9 7 12 20% 3% 30% 15% 12% 20% 60 100%

3 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Annexure 2.5 Assessment and Allocation of Water Before Season – Control Vs Project tanks comparison – District wise

Total % Sample Type District Number of Tanks % of Tanks Tanks Tanks Informal understandi Informal ng among Informal understandin Informal farmers understand No g among understand with ing among assessme Sluices farmers with ing among No Sluices allocation farmers nt or Closed allocation to farmers assessment Closed to only with allocation Permane only head with or allocation Permanent head reach rotation made ntly reach rotation made ly

Control Anantapuram 0 1 0 0 0% 100% 0% 0% 1 100%

Chittoor 0 0 0 1 0% 0% 0% 100% 1 100%

East godavari 0 1 0 0 0% 100% 0% 0% 1 100%

Kadapa 0 0 0 1 0% 0% 0% 100% 1 100%

krishna 0 0 1 0 0% 0% 100% 0% 1 100%

Kurnool 0 0 1 0 0% 0% 100% 0% 1 100%

Nellore 1 0 0 0 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Prakasam 0 0 1 0 0% 0% 100% 0% 1 100%

Srikakulam 0 0 1 0 0% 0% 100% 0% 1 100%

Visakhapatnam 1 0 0 0 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Vizianagaram 0 0 1 0 0% 0% 100% 0% 1 100%

West godavari 0 0 1 0 0% 0% 100% 0% 1 100% Control Sub total 2 2 6 2 17% 17% 50% 17% 12 100%

Anantapuram 0 3 1 0 0% 75% 25% 0% 4 100%

Chittoor 0 0 3 1 0% 0% 75% 25% 4 100%

East godavari 2 0 2 0 50% 0% 50% 0% 4 100%

4 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Kadapa 0 0 4 0 0% 0% 100% 0% 4 100%

krishna 0 4 0 0 0% 100% 0% 0% 4 100%

Kurnool 0 0 4 0 0% 0% 100% 0% 4 100%

Nellore 0 1 3 0 0% 25% 75% 0% 4 100%

Prakasam 0 0 4 0 0% 0% 100% 0% 4 100%

Srikakulam 1 0 3 0 25% 0% 75% 0% 4 100%

Visakhapatnam 2 0 2 0 50% 0% 50% 0% 4 100%

Vizianagaram 3 0 1 0 75% 0% 25% 0% 4 100% Project Sub total 8 8 29 3 17% 17% 60% 6% 48 100%

Total 0 0 2 2 0% 0% 50% 50% 4 100%

5 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Annexure 2.6 Crop Planning Before Season – Control Vs Project comparison- District wise

Sample Type District Number of Tanks % Tanks Total Tanks % Tanks

Informal Informal Informal Informal understandin understandin No crop understandin understandin No crop g on wet g on only wet planning g on wet g on only wet planning and ID crops crops made and ID crops crops made

Control Anantapuram 1 100% 1 100%

Chittoor 1 100% 1 100%

East godavari 1 100% 1 100%

Kadapa 1 100% 1 100%

krishna 1 100% 1 100%

Kurnool 1 100% 1 100%

Nellore 1 100% 1 100%

Prakasam 1 100% 1 100%

Srikakulam 1 100% 1 100% Visakhapatna m 1 100% 1 100%

Vizianagaram 1 100% 1 100% West godavari 1 100% 1 100% Control Sub total 0 5 7 0 42% 58% 12 100%

Project Anantapuram 1 2 1 25% 50% 25% 4 100%

Chittoor 2 2 50% 50% 4 100%

East godavari 3 1 75% 25% 4 100%

Kadapa 1 3 25% 75% 4 100%

6 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Sample Type District Number of Tanks % Tanks Total Tanks % Tanks

krishna 4 100% 4 100%

Kurnool 3 1 75% 25% 4 100%

Nellore 4 100% 4 100%

Prakasam 3 1 75% 25% 4 100%

Srikakulam 4 100% 4 100% Visakhapatna m 1 2 1 25% 50% 25% 4 100%

Vizianagaram 3 1 75% 25% 4 100% West godavari 4 100% 4 100% Project Sub total 3 25 20 6% 52% 42% 48 100%

Total Result 3 30 27 5% 50% 45% 60 100%

7 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Annexure 2.7 Water Scheduling and Release – Control Vs Project tanks comparison - District Wise

Sample Total District Number of Tanks % Tanks % Tanks Type Tanks Informal Informal scheduling Sluices WUA has a scheduling Sluices WUA has a plan No Closed scheduling plan No Closed scheduling among scheduling Permanent plan and among scheduling Permanent plan and farmers plan ly record farmers plan ly record Anantapur Control am 1 100% 1 100%

Chittoor 1 100% 1 100% East godavari 1 100% 1 100%

Kadapa 1 100% 1 100%

krishna 1 100% 1 100%

Kurnool 1 100% 1 100%

Nellore 1 100% 1 100%

Prakasam 1 100% 1 100%

Srikakulam 1 100% 1 100% Visakhapat nam 1 100% 1 100% Vizianagar am 1 100% 1 100% West godavari 1 100% 1 100% Control Sub total 6 4 2 50% 33% 17% 12 100% Anantapur Project am 4 100% 4 100%

Chittoor 3 1 75% 25% 4 100%

East 4 100% 4 100%

8 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Kadapa 1 2 1 25% 50% 25% 4 100%

krishna 4 100% 4 100%

Kurnool 2 2 50% 50% 4 100%

Nellore 4 100% 4 100%

Prakasam 1 3 25% 75% 4 100%

Srikakulam 1 3 25% 75% 4 100% Visakhapat nam 4 100% 4 100% Vizianagar am 4 100% 4 100% West godavari 2 2 50% 50% 4 100% Project Sub total 28 16 3 1 58% 33% 6% 2% 48 100%

Total 34 20 5 1 57% 33% 8% 2% 60 100%

9 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Annexure 2.8 Mode of Water Distribution – Control Vs Project tanks comparison - District wise

Sample Total District Number of Tanks % Tanks % Tanks Type Tanks

Regulate Regulate Regulate Regulate Continuo d (only d (only Sluices Continuo d (only d (only Sluices Continuo us daytime) daytime) Closed Continuo us daytime) daytime) Closed us with without with without Permane us with without with without Permane rotation rotation rotation rotation ntly rotation rotation rotation rotation ntly Anantap Control uram 1 100% 1 100%

Chittoor 1 100% 1 100% East godavari 1 100% 1 100%

Kadapa 1 100% 1 100%

krishna 1 100% 1 100%

Kurnool 1 100% 1 100%

Nellore 1 100% 1 100% Prakasa m 1 100% 1 100% Srikakula m 1 100% 1 100% Visakhap atnam 1 100% 1 100% Vizianag aram 1 100% 1 100% West godavari 1 100% 1 100% Control Sub total 6 4 2 50% 33% 17% 12 100% Anantap Project uram 3 1 75% 25% 4 100%

10 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Sample Total District Number of Tanks % Tanks % Tanks Type Tanks

Chittoor 3 1 75% 25% 4 100% East godavari 3 1 75% 25% 4 100%

Kadapa 2 1 1 50% 25% 25% 4 100%

krishna 3 1 75% 25% 4 100%

Kurnool 2 2 50% 50% 4 100%

Nellore 3 1 75% 25% 4 100% Prakasa m 1 3 25% 75% 4 100% Srikakula m 4 100% 4 100% Visakhap atnam 4 100% 4 100% Vizianag aram 3 1 75% 25% 4 100% West godavari 2 2 50% 50% 4 100% Project Sub total 23 19 1 2 3 48% 40% 2% 4% 6% 48 100%

Total 29 23 1 2 5 48% 38% 2% 3% 8% 60 100%

11 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Annexure-3.1 Progress of works Anantapuram district (Physical & Financial)

Progress of works Anantapuram district

Name of theWork S.No Physical (%) Financial (%)

Rehabilitation of Obuladevara Cheruvu (Independent) in 1 Obuladevara Cheruvu (V) in Obuladevara Cheruvu Mandal in 93% 75.00% Ananthapuramu District Rehabilitation of Mallapalli tank Cascade No. 16 in Mallapalli 2 (V) in Obula devara Cheruvu Mandal in Ananthapuramu 45% 19.00% District Rehabilitation of Kaggallu MI tank cascade No4 in Kaggallu 3 (V) in Hindupur (M) in Ananatapuramu District 10% 0.00%

Rehabilitation of Rachapalli tank (Indipendent) in Rachapalli 4 (V) in Hindupur (M) in Ananatapuramu District 30% 0.00% Rehabilitation of Chalivendala Agraharam tank cascade No10 5 in Chalivendala (V) in Hindupur (M) in Ananatapuramu District 8% 0.00%

Rehabilitation of Sancthebidanur tank (Indipendent) in 6 Santhebidanur (V) in Hindupur (M) in Ananatapuramu District 15% 0.00% Rehabilitation of Beerepalli tank cascade No10 in Beerepalli 7 (V) in Hindupur (M) in Ananatapuramu District 48% 0.00% Rehabilitation of Sirivaram Manempalli tank (Indipendent) in 8 Sirivaram (V) in Lepakshi (M) in Ananatapuramu District 50% 0.00% Rehabilitation of Singanamala tank (independent) in 9 Singanamala (V) in Singanamala (M) in Ananthapuramu 80% 54.00% District Modernization of Rapthadu tank (Independent) in Rapthadu 10 Village & mandal of Ananthapuramu District 100% 77.00% Rehabilitaion of Gondireddypalli tank and Bommeparthy tank 11 Cascade no:3 in Gondireddypalli (V) in Rapthadu (M) in 25% 0.00% Anantahpuramu District Modernization of Aravakuru tank (Independent) in Kammuru 12 Villag, Kudair Mandal of Ananthapuramu District 75% 0.00% Rehabilitation of Mallikethi M. I tank (Independent) in 13 Mallikethi (V) in D. hirehal(M) in Ananthapuramu District 20% 0.00% Rehabilitation of Dodagatta M. I tank (Independent) in 14 Dodagatta (V) in D. hirehal(M) in Ananthapuramu District 30% 0.00% Modernisation of Hulikallu M.I Tank (Independent) in Hulikallu(V) in Kalyandurg(M) in Anantapuramu(Dist.) under 15 APIIATP(World Bank Phase II) 70% 0.00%

Rehabilitation of Mamadur M.I.Tank Cascade in Mamadur (V) 16 in Gooty (M) in Anantapuramu (Dist) 0% 0.00% Rehabilitation of Hawaligi M.I.Tank (Cascade No.18) in 17 Hawaligi (V) in Uravakonda and Vidapanakal (M) in 25% 0.00% Anantapuramu (Dist) Rehabilitation of Marukuntapalli tank Cascade No. 09 in 18 Marukuntapalli (V) in Somandepalli (M) in Ananthapuramu 95% 0.00% (Dist)

0 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Annexure-3.2 Progress of civil works Chittoor district (Physical & Financial)

Progress of civil works in Chittoor distrit

S.No Name of theWork Physical (%) Financial (%)

Rehabilitation of Veerappanayuni cheruvu (Independent) in 1 170 Gollapalli village in Bangarupalem(M) in Chittoor District 50% 28% under APIIATP (World Bank Phase –II) Rehabilitation of Digiva Kitchenna tank cascade No.03 in 2 Jambuvaripalli (V) in Bangarupalem (M) in Chittoor District 50% 46% under APIIATP (World Bank Phase –II) Modernization of Gundlavani cascade No.02 in Thalambedu 3 (V) in Chittoor (M) in Chittoor District under APIIATP (World 30% 24% Bank Phase –II) Modernization of Veerakanellore Pedda cheruvu (Independent) 4 in Veerakanellore (V) in Gangadhara Nellore (M) in Chittoor 85% 45% District under APIIATP (World Bank Phase –II) Rehabilitation of Nangamangalam cheruvu (Independent) in 5 Nangamangalam village in Gudipala (M) in Chittoor District 50% 37% under APIIATP (World Bank Phase –II) (Item no.07) Modernization of Doddagani cheruvu (Independent) in 6 Dommandlapalli(V) in Puthalapattu (M) in Chittoor District 85% 33% under APIIATP (World Bank Phase –II)

Rehabilitation of Madanambedu tank Cascade No.12 in 7 Madanambedu village in Sathyavedu (M) in Chittoor District 18% 0% under APIIATP (World Bank Phase –II)

Rehabilitation of Siranambudur tank(Independent) in 8 Sirinambudur village in Sathyavedu (M) in Chittoor District 20% 0% under APIIATP (World Bank Phase –II)

Rehabilitation of Peddetipakam tank (Independent) in 9 Mittakandriga village in Sathyavedu (M) in Chittoor District 0% 0% under APIIATP (World Bank Phase –II)

Rehabilitation of Madanajeri tank (Independent) in Madanajeri 10 village in Sathyavedu (M) in Chittoor District under APIIATP 35% 0% (World Bank Phase –II)

Rehabilitation of Rajagopalapuram tank (Independent) in 11 Rajagopalapuram village in Sathyavedu (M) in Chittoor District 70% 64% under APIIATP (World Bank Phase –II)

Rehabilitation of P.V.Puram tank (Independent) in 12 P.V.Puram village in Sathyavedu (M) in Chittoor District under 100% 100% APIIATP (World Bank Phase –II)

Rehabilitation of Panduru Big tank (Independent) in Panduru 13 village in Varadaiahpalem (M) in Chittoor District under 49% 16% APIIATP (World Bank Phase –II)

Rehabilitation of Thondambattu Big tank (Independent) in 14 Thondambattu village in Varadaiahpalem (M) in Chittoor 35% 20% District under APIIATP (World Bank Phase –II) Rehabilitation of Kambakam Big tank (Independent) in 15 Kambakam village in Varadaiahpalem (M) in Chittoor District 75% 23% under APIIATP (World Bank Phase –II)

0 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Annexure-3.3 Progress of civil works East Godavari district (Physical & Financial)

Progress of Civil Works in East Godavari district

S.No Name of the Work Physical (%) Financial (%)

Rehabilitation of Yerrakonda MI tank Independent in 1 Vemulova Village in Gangavaram Mandal in East 100% 60% Godavari District under APIIATP Rehabilitation of Venkata reddy Dora M. I Tank 2 (Independent) of Jaddangi(v) of Rajavommangi 80% 39% Mandal of East Godavari District

Rehabilitation of Raju Tank Independent in 3 GandepalleVillage in Gandepalle Mandal in East 65% 31% Godavari District under APIIATP

Rehabilitation of Ura Tank (Independent) in China 4 Brahmadevam village in Peddapuram Mandal in East 0% 0% Godavari District. Rehabilitation of Malludora Tank (Independent) in 5 East Lakshmipuram village in Yeleswaram Mandal in 52% 39% East Godavari District

Rehabilitation of Perumala RajuTank (Independent) 6 in Lingamparthi village in Yeleswaram Mandal in 45% 30% East Godavari District.

Rehabilitation of Chellayamma Tank (Independent) 7 in K. Kothapalli village in Prathipadu Mandal in East 29% 16% Godavari District

Rehabilitation of Nallathammayya Tank 8 (Independent) in Yerravaram village in Yeleswaram 28% 21% Mandal in East Godavari District

Rehabilitation of Pedda Tank (Independent) in 9 Sarabhavaram village in Prathipadu Mandal in East 5% 0% Godavari District Rehabilitation of Kudumala Tank (Independent) in 10 China Sankarlapudi village in Prathipadu Mandal in 5% 0% East Godavari District

Rehabilitation of Konetivari Tank Independent in 11 Bhavavaram Village in Jaggampeta Mandal in East 26.77% 23% Godavari District under APIIATP

Rehabilitation of Cascade No. 09 (Madhavani Tank 12 and Balabhadra Raju Tank) in Vadesaleru village in 7% 0% Rangampeta Mandal in East Godavari District.

Rehabilitation of Raju Tank Independent in 13 Peddapuram Village in Peddapuram Mandal in East 5% 0% Godavari District under APIIATP

Rehabilitation of Tirumalayya Tank (Cascade No 2) in 14 Singampalli village in Rangampeta Mandal in East 0% 0% Godavari District.

1 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Annexure-3.4 Progress of works Kadapa district (Physical & Financial)

Progress of works in Kadapa district

Sl. No Physical Financial Name of the work

1 73% 55.37% Rehabilitation of Tangedu palli M.I. Tank Cascade No.01 in Prabhalavedu village in B. Kodur Mandal in Kadapa District

2 46% 13.86% Rehabilitation of B. Kodur Cascade No.02 in Munnepalli Village in B. Kodur Mandal in Kadapa District

3 Rehabilitation of Puttayapalli Cascade No.03 in PuttayaPalli 29% 33% village in BadvelMandal in Kadapa District

2 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Annexure-3.5 Progress of works Krishna district (Physical & Financial)

Progress of works in Krishna district

S.No Name of the work Physical Financial

1 Rehabilitation of Ura tank (Independent) in Veleru (V) in 16% 10% Bapulapadu (M)

2 Rehabilitation of Diguva Vaddu Tank (independent) in Bahu 17% 9% balendrunigudem(V) in Gannavaram (M)

3 Rehabilitation of Yellappa tank Cascade No. 13 in Narsapuram 36% 4% (V) in Vissannapet (M)

4 Rehabilitation of Kundapalem tank (independent) in Kalagara 16% 9% (V) in Vissannapet (M)

5 Rehabilitation of Nalla tank (independent) in Tatakuntla (V) in 24% 3% Vissannapet (M)

6 Rehabilitation of Gajula cheruvu Cascade No.7 in Putrela (V) in 32% 9% Vissannapet (M)

7 Rehabilitation of Malavagu tank (independent) in Reddigudem 22% 2% (V) & (M)

8 Rehabilitation of Gangula tank (independent) in Maddulaparva 19% 6% (V) in Reddigudem (M)

9 Rehabilitation of Ravula Tank (independednt) in Kotha 19% 5% Naguluru (V) in Reddigudem (M)

10 Rehabilitation of Chilaka samudram tank Cascade No. 5 in 26% 15% Velpucherla (V) in Musunuru (M)

11 Rehabilitation of Jogiraju tank Cascade No. 4 in Gullapudi (V) 20% 4% in Musunuru (M)

12 Rehabilitation of Pedda Tank (independent) in Somavaram (V) 21% 4% in Chatrai (M)

13 Rehabilitation of Borragudem tank Cascade No. 2 in 15% 13% Borragudem (V) in Mylavaram (M)

14 Rehabilitation of Reddigudipati tank (independent) in Pulluru 10% 10% (V) in Mylavaram (M)

15 Rehabilitation of Kesavaraju Tank (independent) in 12% 5% Reddigudem (V) &(M)

16 Rehabilitation of Rudravaram Pedda Cheruvu (independent) in 15% 4% Rudravaram (V) in Reddigudem (M)

17 Rehabilitation of Dharma tank (independent) in Muchinapalli 15% 5% (V) in Reddigudem (M)

3 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Annexure-3.6 Progress of civil works Kurnool district (Physical & Financial)

Progress of civil works in Kurnool district

S.No Name of the Work Physical (%) Financial (%)

Rehabilitation of Vavilala PR Tank Cascade No.08 in Perur (V) in Rudravaram (M) under AP-IIATP•(Covered in Pedda 1 80% 79% Cheruvu, Kotha Cheruvu, Anki Reddy Palli PR Tank and B.Nagireddy palli Cheruvu) in Kurnool District

Rehabilitation of Buchireddy PR Tank Cascade No. 09 in 2 60% 25% Chandaluru Village in Rudravaram Mandal in Kurnool District

Rehabilitation of Parumanchala MI Tank (Independent) in 3 Parumanchala Village in Jupadu Bunglow mandal in kurnool 40% 9% District Rehabilitation of Yerra Cheruvu Cascade No.01 in 4 Peddadevalapuram (V) in Bandiatmakur (M) in Kurnool 55% 34% District Rehabilitation of Vakkileru Anicut (Independent) in 5 26% 0% Kotakandhukur (V) in Allagadda (M) in Kurnool District Rehabilitation of Rangaraju Cheruvu (Independent) in 6 32% 6% Boyalakuntla (V) in Sirvella (M) in Kurnool District Rehabilitation of Palukudoddi cheruvu cascade no.2 in 7 30% 0% Palukudoddi Village in c.belgal Mandal in Kurnool District Rehabilitation of Mutyala Padu M.I Tank Cascade No.04 in 8 95% 67% Mutyala Padu (V) in Chagalamarri (M) in Kurnool District Rehabilitation of Bhavanasi Tank (Independent) in Ahobilam 9 26% 0% (V) in Allagadda (M) in Kurnool District Rehabilitation of Rupanagudi M.I Tank (Independent) in 10 100% 61% Rupanagudi Village in Uyyalawada Mandal in Kurnool District Rehabilitation of Manchalakatta MI Tank (Independent) in 11 Manchalakatta Village in Gadivemula Mandal in Kurnool 40% 34% District Rehabilitation of Mandlem Tank (Independent) in Mandlem 12 85% 0% Village in Jupadu Bungalow Mandal in Kurnool District Rehabilitation of Penumada MI tank (Independent) in 13 50% 48% Kambalapadu Village in krishnagiri Mandal in Kurnool District Rehabilitation of Veerannagattu MI tank (Independent) in 14 25% 0% Veldurthi Village in Veldurthi Mandal in Kurnool District Rehabilitation of Venkatapuram tank (Independent) in 15 35% 28% venkatapuram Village in dhone Mandal in Kurnool District

Rehabilitation of Valluru MI tank (Independent) in valluru 16 65% 21% Village in kowthalam Mandal in Kurnool District

Rehabilitation of Gargi vanka MI tank (Independent) in 17 85% 81% Naganatha halli Village in adoni Mandal in Kurnool District

Rehabilitation of Kaminahal MI tank (Independent) in 18 60% 46% Kaminahal Village in halaharvi Mandal in Kurnool District Rehabilitation of Hathi Belgal tank (Independent) in Hathi 19 35% 4% Belgal Village in aluru Mandal .in Kurnool District

4 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Annexure-3.7 Progress of works Nellore district (Physical & Financial)

Progress of works in Nellore district

S.No Name of the work Physical (%) Financial (%)

Apiiatp - RehabilitationOf Musunuru Big Tank 1 (Independent) In Musunuru & Chenchuganipalem 74% 56.14% Village In Kavali Mandal , Nellore District Rehabilitation Of Jakkapalli Gudur Tank Cascade No-07 2 In Jakkapalligudur Village In Bogole Mandal In Nellore 17% 13.47% District Apiiatp - RehabilitationOf Cascade No.03 In North 3 Amuluru And North Mopur Villages In Allur Mandal , 40% 39.88% Nellore District Rehabilitation Of Pandipadu Tank (Independent) In 4 Pandipadu Village In A S Peta Mandal In Spsr Nellore 7% 0.00% District Rehabilitation Of Lakkarajupalli Tank (Independent) In 5 Lakkarajupalli Village In Anantasagaram Mandal In 9% 0.00% Spsr Nellore District Rehabilitation Of Cherlo Yadavalli Tank (Independent) 6 In Cherlo Yadavalli Village In Atmakur Mandal In Spsr 4% 0.00% Nellore District Rehabilitation Of Ravipadu Tank (Independent) In 7 Ravipadu Village In Vinjamuru Mandal In Nellore 15% 0.00% District Rehabilitation Of Nakkalagandi Reservoir 8 (Independent) In Timmareddypalli Village In 72% 71.77% Varikuntapadu Mandal, Nellore District Rehabilitation Of K Upparapalli Tank (Independent) In 9 Upparapalli Village In Venkatagiri Mandal In Spsr 51% 24.82% Nellore District Rehabilitation Of Telugurayapuram Tank 10 (Independent) In Telugurayapuram Village In 7% 0.00% Kaluvoya Mandal In Spsr Nellore District Rehabilitation Of Siddavaram Tank (Independent) In 11 Siddavaram Village In Rapur Mandal In Spsr Nellore 22% 0.00% District Rehabilitation Of Yepuru Tank (Independent) In 12 31% 16.94% Yepuru Village In Rapur Mandal In Spsr Nellore District Rehabilitation Of Rapur Big Tank (Independent) In 13 45% 45.00% Rapur Village In Rapur Mandal In Nellore District Apiiatp - RehabilitationOf Cascade No.04 In 14 39% 22.25% Madhurupadu Village In Kavali Mandal, Nellore District Rehabilitation Of Gudipadu Tank (Independent) In 15 14% 12.76% Gudipadu Village In A S Peta Mandal, Nellore District Rehabilitation Of Ananthasagaram Tank (Independent) 16 In Ananthasagaram Village In Ananthasagaram 58% 55.14% Mandal, Nellore District Rehabilitation Of Polireddypalli Tank Cascade No-38 In 17 Polireddypalli Village In Marripadu Mandal , Nellore 18% 17.96% District Rehabilitation Of Dabala Tank (Independent) In Rapur 18 Village In Rapur Mandal, Nellore District 48% 15.76% Rehabilitation of Jorepally (Independent)Tank of 19 44% 28.09% Jorepally village of Rapuru mandal under APIIATP. Rehabilitation Of Allampadu Tank Cascade No-21 In 20 19% 18.51% Allampadu Village In Kota Mandal , Nellore District

5 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Progress of works in Nellore district

S.No Name of the work Physical (%) Financial (%)

Rehabilitation Of Kanuparthi Tank (Independent) In 21 Kanuparthi Village In Podalakur Mandal, Nellore 22% 19.79% District Rehabilitation Of Navooru Tank (Independent) In 22 Navooru Village In Podalakur Mandal, Nellore District 11% 10.86% Rehabilitation Of Althurthi Tank (Independent) In 23 24.33% 23.60% Althurthi Village In Podalakur Mandal, Nellore District Rehabilitation Of Tatiparthi Big Tank (Independent) In 24 52% 36.07% Tatiparthi Village In Podalakur Mandal , Nellore District Rehabilitation Of Tatiparthi Small Tank (Independent) 25 In Tatiparthi Village In Podalakur Mandal , Nellore 80% 50.81% District Rehabilitation of Chalamacherla Large Tank 26 (Independent) in Chalamacherla village in Kavali 98% 98.46% Mandal in Nellore District Rehabilitation of Adavilakshmipuram Tank 27 (Independent) in Adavilakshmipuram village in Kavali 80% 65.45% Mandal in Nellore District Rehabilitation of Rudrakota Large Tank(Independent), 28 64% 45.21% Rudrakota (V) and Kavali Mandal in Nellore District Rehabilitation of Bogole Tank Cascade No.1 in Bogole 29 57% 37.26% Mandal in Nellore District Rehabilitation of Rangasamudram Tank Cascade No.9 30 84% 73.21% in Dagadarthi Mandal in Nellore District Rehabilitation of Bodagudipadu Kotha Tank 31 (Independent), Bodagudipadu (V) and Dagadarthi 90% 43.56% Mandal in Nellore District Rehabilitation of Dundigam Tank (Independent), 32 Dundigam (V) and Dagadarthi Mandal in Nellore 81% 81.06% District Rehabilitation of Sankavaram Tank, Sankavaram (V) 33 100% 100.00% and Vinjamuru Mandal in Nellore District Rehabilitation of Peddakaniyampadu Tank 34 (Independent), Peddakaniyampadu (V) and 32% 24.68% Varikuntapadu Mandal in Nellore District Rehabilitation of Peddannaluru Old Tank 35 (Independent), Peddannaluru (V) and Kalikiri Mandal 46% 46.37% in Nellore District Rehabilitation of Kudumuladinnepadu Tank 36 (Independent), Kudumuladinnepadu (V) and Kalikiri 85% 84.88% Mandal in Nellore District Rehabilitation of Kalavalapudi Tank (Independent), 37 Kalavalapudi (V) and Venkatagiri Mandal in Nellore 62% 42.19% District Rehabilitation of Pathabitragunta West Tank Cascade 38 65% 53.03% No.8 in Bogole Mandal in Nellore District

6 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Annexure-3.8 Progress of civil works Prakasham district (Physical & Financial)

Progress of Civil Works in Prakasham district.

S.No Name of theWork Physical (%) Financial (%)

Rehabilitation of Markapur tank (independent) in Markapur 1 100 100.00 Village in Markapur (M) in Prakasam District

Rehabilitation Of Gandlopalli Tank (Independent) In 2 100 100.00 Kondareddypalli Village In Tarlupadu (M) In Prakasam District

Rehabilitation Of Tangella Mi Tank (Independent) In Tangella 3 20 0.00 Village In Marripudi (M) In Prakasam District

Rehabilitation Of Tummalacheruvu Mi Tank (Independent) In 4 50 0.00 Tummalacheruvu (V) In Tarlupadu (M) In Prakasam District

Rehabilitation Of Gangamma Tank (Independent) In 5 40 0.00 Gangampalli Village In Racherla (M) In Prakasam District Rehabilitation Of Rajupalem Mi Tank (Independent) In 6 60 58.90 Rajupalem Village In Martur (M) In Prakasam District Rehabilitation Of Avulamanda Mi Tank (Independent) In 7 20 0.00 Avulamanda Village In Kurichedu (M) In Prakasam District Rehabilitation Of Gorrepadu Mi Tank (Independent) In 8 60 47.52 Gorrepadu Village In Ballikuruva (M) In Prakasam District Rehabilitation Of Kondapi Mi Tank (Independent) In Kondapi 9 20 0.00 Village In Kondapi (M) In Prakasam District

Rehabilitation Of Deverajugattu Cascade No.06 (Peddaraveedu 10 Tank And Devarajugattu Tank) In Peddaraveedu Village In 70 23.29 Peddaraveedu (M) In Prakasam District .

Rehabilitation Of Martur Mi Tank (Independent) In Martur 11 30 42.37 Village In Martur (M) In Prakasam District Rehabilitation Of Chennupalli Mi Tank Cascade No.02 In 12 30 0.00 Chennupalli Village In Ballikurava (M) In Prakasam District – Rehabilitation Of Petluru Cascade No.12 (Ura Tank And Kotha 13 50 0.00 Tank) In Petluru Village In Kondapi (M) In Prakasam District Rehabilitation of Bodireddypalli tank (independent) in 14 Obulakkapalli Village in Peddaraveedu (M) in Prakasam 65 22.94 District Rehabilitation of Nayuni tank (independent) in Bollupalle 15 30 0.00 Village in Ardhaveedu (M) in Prakasam District

Rehabilitation of Chennarayuni Tank Cascade No. 18 (Mallaiah 16 Cheruvu, Timmanna Tank and Chennarayuni Tank) in 40 0.00 Ardhaveedu Village in Ardhaveedu (M) in Prakasam District

Rehabilitation of Tappetavani Cheruvu (independent) in 17 Thurimella Village in Cumbum (M) in Prakasam District under 50 17.42 APII&ATP Rehabilitation of Teegaleru Reservoir (independent) in Y. 18 Cherlopalli Village in Dornala (M) in Prakasam District under 50 48.91 APII ATP Rehabilitation of Tularam Kathawal (Independent) in Bollu 19 0 0.00 palle village in Ardhaveedu Mandal in Prakasam District Rehabilitation of Pusalapadu tank in Pusalapadu village in 20 50 0.00 Bestawaripeta mandal in Prakasam District

7 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Progress of Civil Works in Prakasham district.

S.No Name of theWork Physical (%) Financial (%)

Rehabilitation of Yedavalli Small tank cascade No-16 in 21 35 0.00 Yedavalli village in Racherla Mandal in Prakasam District

Rehabilitation of Circar tank (Independent) in Bhupatipalli 22 60 0.00 village in Markapur Mandal in Prakasam District

Rehabilitation of naidu tank (Independent) in Pullayapalli 23 100 95.70 village in Donakonda mandla in Prakasam District

Rehabilitation of Pedda Nagulavaram tank (Independent) in 24 Peddanagulavaram village in Markapur mandal in Prakasam 80 56.06 District

Rehabilitation of Circar Pedda Cheruvu Cascade No-05 in 25 50 0.00 Palakaveedu village in Racherla Manadal in Prakasam District

Rehabilitation of Damarla Tank (Independent) in Komarolu 26 35 0.00 village in Komarolu Mandal in Prakasam District Rehabilitation of Thimmaraju Obulapathi Tank (Independent) 27 in Mundlapadu village in Giddaluru mandal in Prakasam 40 9.85 District

Rehabilitation of Sunkireddy tank cascade No-17(Rangareddy 28 Tank &Sunki reddy Tank) in Chittireddy palli village in 35 33.28 Giddaluru Mandal in Prakasam District

8 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Annexure-3.9 Progress of civil works Srikakulum district (Physical & Financial)

Progress of Civil Works in Srikakulum district S.No Name of theWork Physical (%) Financial (%)

Rehabilitation of Buchanna Karra Cascade 01 in PL Devi Peta 1 16.67 10.31 Village in Burja Mandal in Srikakulam District under APIIATP

Rehabilitation of Kotha Tank Cascade 05 in Kuppili Village in 2 30.01 19.21 Etcherla Mandal in Srikakulam District under APIIATP

Rehabilitation of Ponakala Tank of Amadalavlasa Village in 3 2.00 0.00 Amadalavlasa Mandal in Srikakulam District under APIIATP

Rehabilitation of Sagaram Tank of Ramachandrapuram Village 4 2.00 0.00 in Amadalavlasa Mandal in Srikakulam District under APIIATP

Rehabilitation of Bandikai Tank of Gorlepadu Village in Kaviti 5 33.84 26.08 Mandal in Srikakulam District under APIIATP

Rehabilitation of Kurmasagaram Tank Cascade 02 in Thotavada 6 0.00 0.00 Village in Burja Mandal in Srikakulam District under APIIATP

Rehabilitation of Singanna Tank Cascade 03 in Singannapalem 7 0.00 0.00 Village in Burja Mandal in Srikakulam District under APIIATP

Rehabilitation of Vallasagaram Tank Cascade 04 in Kuppili 8 Village in Etcherla Mandal in Srikakulam District under 0.00 0.00 APIIATP

9 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Annexure-3.10 Progress of works Visakhapatnam district (Physical & Financial)

Progress of works in Visakhapatnam District S.No Name of the Work Physical (%) Financial (%) Modernization of Dattappa Tank(Independent) in 1 Peddipalem(V), Anandapuram(M), Visakhapatnam 45 26 District under APIIATP(World Bank PhaseII) Modernization/Rehabilitation of Palagedda Anicut (Independent) in Kothayellavaram(V), 2 50 42 Golugonda(M) of Visakhapatnam District under APIIATP(World Bank PhaseII). Modernization/Rehabilitation of Pedda tank (Independent) in Sunkapura(V) in Kotauratla(M) in 3 40 29 Visakhapatnam District under APIIATP(World Bank PhaseII). Modernization/Rehabilitation of Chowduvada channel (Independent) in Chowduvada(V) in 4 30 25 Kotauratla(M) in Visakhapatnam District under APIIATP(World Bank PhaseII). Modernization/Rehabilitation of Kanumala Tank (Cascade No.11) in Yerakannapalem(V) in 5 25 10 Narsipatnam (M) in Visakhapatnam District under APIIATP(World Bank PhaseII). Modernization/Rehabilitation of Chiranjeevi tank (cascade No.9) in Bayyavaram(V) in 6 36 24 Makavarapalem(M) in Visakhapatnam District under APIIATP(World Bank PhaseII). Modernization/Rehabilitation of Jagannadha RajuTank Cascade in Godicherla(V), Nakkapalli(M), 7 16 11 Visakhapatnam Districtunder APIIATP(World Bank PhaseII). Modernization of Dontalavani Tank Cascade in 8 Podugupalem(V), Anandapuram(M), Visakhapatnam 28 7 District under APIIATP(World Bank PhaseII) Modernization/Rehabilitation of Ummadi tank (Cascade No.13) in Vemagiri(V) in 9 15 15 S.Rayavaram(M) in Visakhapatnam District under APIIATP(World Bank PhaseII). Modernization/Rehabilitation of Kinchavanipalem Reservoir (Independent) in Kinchavanipalem (V) in 10 22 22 Koyyuru(M) in Visakhapatnam District under APIIATP(World Bank PhaseII). Modernization/Rehabilitation of Yenadri Tank (Independent) in Revidi(V) in Padmanabham(M) in 11 25 25 Visakhapatnam District under APIIATP(World Bank PhaseII).

Rehabilitation of Illamdevi Tank( Cascade No.12) in 12 Dakamarri (V) in Bheemili(M) Visakhapatnam 20 20 District under APIIATP(World Bank PhaseII).

Modernization of Kanumala Tank Cascade No.2 in 13 Chinadoddigallu(V), Nakkapalli(M), Visakhapatnam 6 6 District under APIIATP(World Bank PhaseII).

Modernization/Rehabilitation of Lubharthi Reservoir (Independent) in Lubharthi(V) in Koyyuru(M) in 14 34 34 Visakhapatnam District under APIIATP(World Bank PhaseII).

10 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Progress of works in Visakhapatnam District

S.No Name of the Work Physical (%) Financial (%)

Modernization of Yerakannadora Tank Cascade in 15 Anakapalli(V) &(M), Visakhapatnam District under 5 3 APIIATP(World Bank PhaseII).

Modernization of Palli Tank(Independent) in 16 Kusulavada(V), Anandapuram(M), Visakhapatnam 42 30 District under APIIATP(World Bank PhaseII)

Modernization/Rehabilitation of Palepu Cascade in 17 Kumarpuram(V), Golugonda(M), Visakhapatnam 5 5 District under APIIATP(World Bank PhaseII).

Modernization/Rehabilitation of Tajangi Reservoir (Independent) in Tajangi (V) in Chintapalli(M) in 18 6 2 Visakhapatnam District under APIIATP(World Bank PhaseII). Modernization/Rehabilitation of Yedlagedda Reservoir (Independent) in Kokkiraipalli(V), 19 2 2 Yellamanchilli(M) of Visakhapatnam District under APIIATP(World Bank PhaseII).

Modernization/Rehabilitation of Tamaracherla Channel (Independent) in Dimili (V), Rambilli(M) of 20 2 2 Visakhapatnam District under APIIATP(World Bank PhaseII).

11 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Annexure-3. 11 Progress of works Vizianagaram district (Physical & Financial)

Progress of works in Vizyanagaram district

S.No Name of the work Physical Financial

Modernization/Rehabilitation of Namassivaya tank Cascades 1 34% 31% No.5 in Chintada(V)S.Kota(M) Modernization/Rehabilitation of Dabbiraju tank 2 0% 0% (Indipendent) in VallampudiV)Vepada(M)

3 Modernization/Rehabilitation of Vissanna Tank Cascades 0% 0% No.8 in Cheepuruvalasa(V) Kothavalasa(M) Modernization/Rehabilitation of Raju tank (Indipendent) in 4 41% 0% LingalavalasaV)Dattirajeru(M) Modernization/Rehabilitation of Venkayya tank 5 23% 0% (Indipendent) in Poram(V) Mentada(M) Modernization/Rehabilitation of Raju Tank Cascades No.9 in 6 35% 0% Chinamedapalli(V) Mentada(M) Modernization/Rehabilitation of Konda Raju Tank 7 8% 4% (Independent) inGunupurupeta(V) Denkada(M) Modernization/Rehabilitation of Rayudu Tank (Cascade 8 0% 0% No.6) in Seetharampuram(V) Vepada(M) Modernization/Rehabilitation of Muppanna banda (Cascade 9 15% 15% No.3) in Kella(V) Gurla(M) Modernization/Rehabilitation of Pedda tank (Independent) 10 1% 0% in Pinavemali(V) Vizianagaram(M) 11 Modernization/Rehabilitation of Jayakara tank (Cascade No. 14% 12% 1 ) in Devarapodilam(V) Cheepurupalli(M) Modernization/Rehabilitation of Anantha sagaram tank 12 14% 0% (Independent) in Sathiavada(V) Nellimarla(M) Modernization/Rehabilitation of Markondapatanyakuni tank 13 8% 5% (Independent) in Korlam(V) Merakamudidam(M) Modernization/Rehabilitation of Vijayaramasagaram tank 14 16% 12% (Independent) in Vasantha(V) Gantyada(M) Modernization/Rehabilitation of Bomminayani Tank 15 0% 0% (Independent) in Rajeru(V) Badangi(M)

16 Modernization/Rehabilitation of Tumba Tank (Independent) 0% 0% in Burja(V) Seethanagaram(M) Modernization/Rehabilitation of Rani Cheruvu 17 20% 19% (Independent) in Lingapuram(V) Therlam(M) Modernization/Rehabilitation of Komati tank (Independent) 18 22% 21% in Uttaravalli(V) Merakamudidam(M) Modernization/Rehabilitation of Sadasivuni tank (Cascade 19 36% 34% No.19) in Uttaravalli(V) Merakamudidam(M) Modernization/Rehabilitation of Gollampi tank (Cascade 20 0% 0% No.15) in Narayanapuram(V) Balijipeta(M)

12 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Annexure-3.12 Progress of works West Godavari district (Physical & Financial)

Progress of works in West Godavari district

S.No Name of the Work Physical (%) Financial (%)

1 Rehabilitation of Burugugadda vari kunta tank Cascade No.11 in 2% 0% Kommugudem (V) in Polavaram (M)

2 Rehabilitation of Desalavarikattu tank Cascade No.04 in 20% 14% Lakshmugudem (V) in Buttaigudem (M)

3 Rehabilitation of Ura tank (Independent) in Jeelugumilli (V) in 95% 88% Jeelugumilli(M)

4 Rehabilitation of Puntha tank (Independent) in Reddi 10% 4% Ganapavaram (V) in Buttaigudem(M)

5 Rehabilitation of Bommaraju kunta Cascade No.3 in 13% 0% Rayannapalem (V) in Pedavegi (M)

6 Rehabilitation of Andachandala tank (Independent) 85% 80% Antarvedigudem village in Buttaigudem(M)

7 Rehabilitation of Allicalva tank (Independent) in 20% 30% Manchulavarigudem (V) in Buttaigudem (M)

8 44% 22% Rehabilitation Singasamudram Tank Cascade .01 in Thirumalapalem (V) in Dwaraka Tirumala (M)

9 Rehabilitation of Gatchkayala Kunta Cascade.02 in 10% Chakrayagudem(V) in Pedavegi (M) 0%

10 Rehabilation of Lothuvagu Tank Independent in Buruguvada (V) 90% 85% in Buttaigudem (M)

11 Rehabilitation of Gadala tank Cascade No.06 in Polavaram (V) in 20% 10% Polavaram (M)

13 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP ANNEXURE 5.1: A.P.INTEGRATED IRRIGATION AND AGRICULTURE TRANSFORMATION PROJECT- ACTION PLAN 2020-21

Pillar: B.1 . PRODUCTION PLAN Rs. In Lakhs

Total Unit Assitance Expenditure Total S.N COMPONENTS Unit cost (INR Subsidy % Account Lakhs) Phy Fin I Productivity Enhancement Activities (These will be organised under supervision of RBK in the selected village of Project Area.) AEP Banana Ha 1.02462 75% 0.76847 350-352 34.59 26.58 AEP Cocoa Ha 0.5 75% 0.3750 350-352 17.47 6.55 Cashew/Cocoa Canopy management Ha 0.12 75% 0.0900 350-352 309.69 27.87 a.Protected Cultivation i. Poly House (4000 Sq.m=1 Unit) 1 Unit 33.76000 75.00 25.32 350-352 0.00 0.00 ii. Shade net house (4000 Sq.m=1 Unit) 1 Unit 28.40000 75.00 21.30 350-352 4.00 85.20 Sub total P.Cultivation 365.75 146.20

b.Adoption of water soluble fertilizers Ha 0.23759 75.00 0.18 350-352 541.45 97.46 c. ICM & INM in Horticulture crops Ha 0.16000 75.00 0.12 350-352 1343.35 161.20 d. Permananat Pandals Ha 5.00000 75.00 3.75 350-352 28.50 106.88 Sub total 1913.30 365.54 II Quality enhancement Activities (These will be organised under supervision of RBK in the selected village of Project Area.) Fruit care Activities a. Banana Ha 0.55 75 0.413 350-352 175.00 72.19 b.Mango fruit covers Ha 0.2 70 0.140 350-352 400.00 56.00 c. Guava Fruit covers Ha 0.12 70 0.084 350-352 220.00 18.48 d.Pomegranate fruit covers Ha 0.11 70 0.077 350-352 215.00 16.56 e. Fruit pickers Ha 0.045 75 0.034 350-352 110.00 3.71 Sub Total 1120.00 166.94 III Capacity Buildaing ( These programmes will be organised in the knowledge center of RBK) 1. Farmers Training (District Level) 0.25 350-355 54.00 13.50

0 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP Pillar: B.1 . PRODUCTION PLAN Rs. In Lakhs

Total Unit Assitance Expenditure Total S.N COMPONENTS Unit cost (INR Subsidy % Account Lakhs) Phy Fin 2.Farmers Training (State Level) 0.01 100.00 0.50 350-355 4.00 2.00 3.Exposure Visits with in the state 0.25 350-355 2.00 0.50 4.Farmers visit out side the state 0.25 100.00 1.50 350-355 4.00 6.00 5. Meetings & Work shops 3.00 170-174 0.00 9.00 Capacity Building Total 64.00 31.00 IV Staff 1.Horticulture Consultant No.s 0.40 300-301 1.00 4.80 2. Junior Assistant No.s 0.21 300-302 1.00 2.53 3. DEO No.s 0.21 300-302 13.00 32.93 Sub Total 15.00 40.26 V Equipment 1. Computers and other accessories 210-213 0.00 2.50 VI Operations & Maintenance 1. Other Office Expenses 130-135 0.00 10.00 2.Other Administrative Expenses 130-137 0.00 0.00 3. Publications (Print media) 260-261 0.00 0.00 4. Hiring of Vehicles 0.35 130-134 13.00 54.60 Sub Total 13.00 67.10 Grand Total 3491.05 817.04

1 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP Annexure 9.1 Beneficiary status

Control/ Beneficiaries Borewell user Borewell user in Non- Grand % Borewell % Borewell user in % Non- % Other % Total Project in ayacut area in ayacut tank influence zone Ayacutdar Total user in ayacut tank influence zone Ayacutdar water users CONTROL 169 7 1 0 177 95 4 1 0 100 Anantapuram 15 0 0 0 15 100 0 0 0 100 Chittoor 14 1 0 0 15 93 7 0 0 100 East Godavari 15 0 0 0 15 100 0 0 0 100 Kadapa 10 5 0 0 15 67 33 0 0 100 Krishna 15 0 0 0 15 100 0 0 0 100 Kurnool 14 1 0 0 15 93 7 0 0 100 Nellore 14 0 1 0 15 93 0 7 0 100 Prakasham 15 0 0 0 15 100 0 0 0 100 Srikakulam 15 0 0 0 15 100 0 0 0 100 Visakhapatnam 15 0 0 0 15 100 0 0 0 100 Vizianagaram 12 0 0 0 12 100 0 0 0 100 West Godavari 15 0 0 0 15 100 0 0 0 100 PROJECT 675 20 2 1 698 97 3 0 0 100 Anantapuram 60 0 0 0 60 100 0 0 0 100 Chittoor 58 2 0 0 60 97 3 0 0 100 East Godavari 60 0 0 0 60 100 0 0 0 100 Kadapa 41 17 1 1 60 68 28 2 2 100 Krishna 59 0 1 0 60 98 0 2 0 100 Kurnool 60 0 0 0 60 100 0 0 0 100 Nellore 59 1 0 0 60 98 2 0 0 100 Prakasham 45 0 0 0 45 100 0 0 0 100 Srikakulam 60 0 0 0 60 100 0 0 0 100 Visakhapatnam 56 0 0 0 56 100 0 0 0 100 Vizianagaram 57 0 0 0 57 100 0 0 0 100 West Godavari 60 0 0 0 60 100 0 0 0 100 Grand Total 844 27 3 1 875 96 3 1 0 100

2 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP Annexure 9.2 Household size wise (No of Acres)

Control/ Project 0.1 to 1 1.1 to 2 2.1 to3 3.1 to 4 4.1 to 5 5.1 to 6 6.1 to 7 7.1 to 8 8.1 to 9 9.1 to 10 Above 10 Grand Total CONTROL 58 54 20 17 12 5 2 3 2 1 3 177 Anantapuram 4 0 2 1 3 2 0 1 1 0 1 15 Chittoor 5 2 4 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 15 East Godavari 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 Kadapa 5 6 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 15 Krishna 2 4 3 3 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 15 Kurnool 1 3 4 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 15 Nellore 2 8 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 Prakasham 7 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 Srikakulam 4 7 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 15 Visakhapatnam 8 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 15 Vizianagaram 5 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 12 West Godavari 1 5 0 6 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 15 PROJECT 190 208 105 66 39 25 15 12 4 2 32 698 Anantapuram 6 21 8 5 4 6 4 2 0 0 4 60 Chittoor 7 17 13 8 3 1 4 1 0 0 5 60 East Godavari 35 9 4 4 2 2 1 2 0 2 1 60 Kadapa 15 16 19 5 5 0 0 0 0 7 0 60 Krishna 19 21 7 4 4 2 1 0 1 0 2 60 Kurnool 10 14 10 7 4 3 1 3 1 0 6 60 Nellore 7 19 6 14 7 4 1 0 0 0 2 60 Prakasham 18 10 3 5 2 2 0 1 1 0 3 45 Srikakulam 28 15 7 6 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 60 Visakhapatnam 29 18 8 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 56 Vizianagaram 10 28 10 5 1 2 0 1 0 6 0 57 West Godavari 6 20 10 2 4 1 3 2 1 2 9 60

Grand Total 235 261 123 83 51 30 17 14 6 0 35 875

3 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP Household size wise (No of Acres) – percentage(%) Control/Project 0.1 to 1 1.1 to 2 2.1 to3 3.1 to 4 4.1 to 5 5.1 to 6 6.1 to 7 7.1 to 8 8.1 to 9 9.1 to 10 Above 10 Grand Total CONTROL 33 31 11 10 7 3 1 2 1 1 2 100 Anantapuram 27 0 13 7 20 13 0 7 7 0 7 100 Chittoor 33 13 27 0 7 13 0 0 7 0 0 100 East Godavari 93 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 Kadapa 33 40 20 0 7 0 0 0 0 7 0 100 Krishna 13 27 20 20 13 0 0 7 0 0 0 100 Kurnool 7 20 27 20 7 7 7 0 0 0 7 100 Nellore 13 53 20 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 Prakasham 47 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 Srikakulam 27 47 0 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 7 100 Visakhapatnam 53 33 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 7 0 100 Vizianagaram 42 42 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 West Godavari 7 33 0 40 13 0 0 0 0 7 0 100 PROJECT 27 30 15 9 6 4 2 2 1 0 5 100 Anantapuram 10 35 13 8 7 10 7 3 0 0 7 100 Chittoor 12 28 22 13 5 2 7 2 0 0 8 100 East Godavari 58 15 7 7 3 3 2 3 0 3 2 100 Kadapa 25 27 32 8 8 0 0 0 0 12 0 100 Krishna 32 35 12 7 7 3 2 0 2 0 3 100 Kurnool 17 23 17 12 7 5 2 5 2 0 10 100 Nellore 12 32 10 23 12 7 2 0 0 0 3 100 Prakasham 40 22 7 11 4 4 0 2 2 0 7 100 Srikakulam 47 25 12 10 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 100 Visakhapatnam 52 32 14 2 0 2 0 0 0 5 0 100 Vizianagaram 18 49 18 9 2 4 0 2 0 11 0 100 West Godavari 10 33 17 3 7 2 5 3 2 3 15 100 Grand Total 27 30 14 9 6 3 2 2 1 0 4 100

4 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Annexure 9.3 Caste wise Details

Control/ Project SC ST BC Others Grand Total %SC %ST %BC %Others %Grand Total 19 3 61 94 177 11 2 34 53 100 CONTROL Anantapuram 0 0 5 10 15 0 0 33 67 100

Chittoor 0 0 1 14 15 0 0 7 93 100

East Godavari 0 0 15 15 0 0 0 100 100

Kadapa 2 0 5 8 15 13 0 33 53 100

Krishna 4 0 1 10 15 27 0 7 67 100

Kurnool 5 1 6 3 15 33 7 40 20 100

Nellore 7 0 1 7 15 47 0 7 47 100

Prakasham 1 0 3 11 15 7 0 20 73 100

Srikakulam 0 0 15 9 15 0 0 100 60 100

Visakhapatnam 0 2 7 6 15 0 13 47 40 100

Vizianagaram 0 0 12 9 12 0 0 100 75 100

West Godavari 0 0 5 10 15 0 0 33 67 100

PROJECT 54 62 345 237 698 8 9 49 34 100

Anantapuram 11 0 43 6 60 18 0 72 10 100

Chittoor 15 0 15 30 60 25 0 25 50 100

East Godavari 0 15 15 30 60 0 25 25 50 100

5 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP Control/ Project SC ST BC Others Grand Total %SC %ST %BC %Others %Grand Total Kadapa 10 1 27 22 60 17 2 45 37 100

Krishna 2 0 26 32 60 3 0 43 53 100

Kurnool 6 0 44 10 60 10 0 73 17 100

Nellore 9 1 15 35 60 15 2 25 58 100

Prakasham 1 2 8 34 45 2 4 18 76 100

Srikakulam 0 0 59 1 60 0 0 98 2 100

Visakhapatnam 0 12 44 0 56 0 21 79 0 100

Vizianagaram 0 15 42 0 57 0 26 74 0 100

West Godavari 0 16 7 37 60 0 27 12 62 100

Grand Total 73 65 406 331 875 8 7 46 38 100

6 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP Annexure 9.4 – Type of house/shelter Control /Project Pucca Semi Pucca Kutcha Total Nos. % Pucca house % Semi pucca % Kutcha Total value in Rs Avg Value in Rs CONTROL 164 12 1 177 92.7 6.8 0.6 99705000 576329 Anantapuram 15 0 0 15 100.0 0.0 0.0 4430000 295333 Chittoor 15 0 0 15 100.0 0.0 0.0 6000000 400000 East Godavari 9 6 0 15 60.0 40.0 0.0 17630000 1175333 Kadapa 15 0 0 15 100.0 0.0 0.0 3430000 228667 Krishna 14 0 1 15 93.3 0.0 6.7 23250000 1550000 Kurnool 15 0 0 15 100.0 0.0 0.0 3375000 225000 Nellore 15 0 0 15 100.0 0.0 0.0 2040000 136000 Prakasham 15 0 0 15 100.0 0.0 0.0 3400000 226667 Srikakulam 15 0 0 15 100.0 0.0 0.0 11650000 776667 Visakhapatnam 13 2 0 15 86.7 13.3 0.0 4000000 363636 Vizianagaram 10 2 0 12 83.3 16.7 0.0 4100000 341667 West Godavari 13 2 0 15 86.7 13.3 0.0 16400000 1093333 PROJECT 630 62 6 698 90.3 8.9 0.9 195236000 577621 Anantapuram 60 0 0 60 100.0 0.0 0.0 8760000 292000 Chittoor 60 0 0 60 100.0 0.0 0.0 13430000 447667 East Godavari 46 13 1 60 76.7 21.7 1.7 32340000 1078000 Kadapa 60 0 0 60 100.0 0.0 0.0 8170000 291786 Krishna 50 9 1 60 83.3 15.0 1.7 21400000 713333 Kurnool 58 2 0 60 96.7 3.3 0.0 6541000 297318 Nellore 60 0 0 60 100.0 0.0 0.0 9995000 333167 Prakasham 41 4 0 45 91.1 8.9 0.0 16590000 572069 Srikakulam 57 1 2 60 95.0 1.7 3.3 15040000 501333 Visakhapatnam 49 7 0 56 87.5 12.5 0.0 7100000 373684 Vizianagaram 44 13 0 57 77.2 22.8 0.0 8700000 290000 West Godavari 45 13 2 60 75.0 21.7 3.3 47170000 1572333 Grand Total 794 74 7 875 90.7 8.5 0.8 457549000 549279

7 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP Annexure 9.6 (A) Agriculture implements – District wise

Total Plough Benefi Tract ( Project/Control ciary or Poewr trillers Bullock Carts Nagali)

Total Average Total Total Average Total Total Average Total Total Average No. % Total Value Value No. % Value Value No. % Value Value No. % Value Value 1350000. CONTROL 177 10 0 16200001 0833333 1 0.6 0 0 7 4.0 136000 19429 5 2.8 44000 8800 13. Anantapuram 15 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 2 3 78000 39000 4 26.7 36000 9000

Chittoor 15 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0

East Godavari 15 1 7 650001 325001 1 6.7 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0

Kadapa 15 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0

Krishna 15 5 33 12250000 2450000 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0

Kurnool 15 1 7 1400000 700000 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0

Nellore 15 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 33. Prakasham 15 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 5 3 58000 11600 1 6.7 8000 8000

Srikakulam 15 1 7 700000 700000 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0

Visakhapatnam 15 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0

Vizianagaram 12 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0

West Godavari 15 2 13 1200000 600000 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0

PROJECT 698 44 6 16895000 403894 8 1.2 395000 50833 39 5.7 1258001 31450 48 7.0 292052 5822 55. Anantapuram 60 2 3 550000 137500 3 5.0 65000 10833 33 0 1131000 34200 32 53.3 174550 5283

Chittoor 60 14 23 4960000 352308 1 1.7 60000 30000 0 0.0 0 0 6 10.0 84000 12000

East Godavari 60 3 5 1050000 437500 1 1.7 60000 30000 1 1.7 15000 7500 0 0.0 2 1

8 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP Total Plough Benefi Tract ( Project/Control ciary or Poewr trillers Bullock Carts Nagali)

Total Average Total Total Average Total Total Average Total Total Average No. % Total Value Value No. % Value Value No. % Value Value No. % Value Value

Kadapa 60 1 2 500000 250000 1 1.7 10000 5000 1 1.7 8000 4000 2 3.3 16000 4000

Krishna 60 7 12 2535000 377917 1 1.7 100000 50000 1 1.7 4000 2000 1 1.7 1500 750

Kurnool 60 5 8 1950000 487500 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 25000 12500 0 0.0 0 0

Nellore 60 2 3 850000 212500 1 1.7 100000 50000 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0

Prakasham 45 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0

Srikakulam 60 2 3 800000 200000 0 0.0 0 0 1 1.7 1 1 1 1.7 0 0

Visakhapatnam 56 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0

Vizianagaram 57 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0

West Godavari 60 8 27 3700000 443333 0 0.0 0 0 2 3.3 75000 18750 6 10.0 16000 2000

Grand Total 875 54 6 33095001 601727 9 1.0 395000 49375 46 5.3 1394001 29660 53 6.1 336052 6223

9 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Annexure 9.6 (B) Agriculture implements – District wise

Spray Spray Total Oil er er Project/Contr Benefici Cultiv Pump Engin (Man (Pow ol ary ator set e ual) er) Avera Avera Avera Avera Avera Total Total ge Total Total ge Total Total ge Total Total ge Total Total ge No. % Value Value No. % Value Value No. % Value Value No. % Value Value No. % Value Value 1550 2214 1205 2008 4900 1225 8030 2395 1197 CONTROL 177 6 3.4 00 3 6 3.4 000 33 4 2.3 0 0 12 6.8 0 6692 20 11.3 00 5 1000 1000 7300 Anantapuram 15 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 1 6.7 0 0 9 60.0 0 8111

Chittoor 15 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 East 7000 7000 Godavari 15 0 0.0 0 0 1 6.7 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 1 6.7 2000 2000 1 6.7 3500 3500

Kadapa 15 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 1200 2400 1350 4500 4300 1433 2250 1300 2600 Krishna 15 5 33.3 00 0 3 20.0 00 0 3 20.0 0 3 3 20.0 0 7500 5 33.3 00 0 2500 2500 Kurnool 15 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0

Nellore 15 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 2000 1000 Prakasham 15 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 2 13.3 0 0 0 0.0 0 0

Srikakulam 15 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 1 6.7 6000 6000 1 6.7 4000 4000 0 0.0 0 0 Visakhapatna m 15 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0

Vizianagaram 12 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 West 1000 1000 1000 5000 2180 3300 Godavari 15 1 6.7 0 0 2 13.3 000 00 0 0.0 0 0 4 26.7 0 5450 5 33.3 0 6600 3360 1575 2822 5085 1490 1490 1776 6044 PROJECT 698 21 3.1 00 0 47 6.9 063 7 10 1.5 00 0 48 7.0 00 3435 77 11.3 00 7937

10 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP Spray Spray Total Oil er er Project/Contr Benefici Cultiv Pump Engin (Man (Pow ol ary ator set e ual) er) Avera Avera Avera Avera Avera Total Total ge Total Total ge Total Total ge Total Total ge Total Total ge No. % Value Value No. % Value Value No. % Value Value No. % Value Value No. % Value Value 3900 5650 3880 Anantapuram 60 3 5.0 0 6500 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 8 13.3 0 6167 42 70.0 00 9417 4800 4730 2235 5700 1002 Chittoor 60 4 6.7 0 6000 21 35.0 00 5 5 8.3 0 5700 3 5.0 5600 2275 15 25.0 00 3340 East 3000 1500 1500 7500 3490 1170 Godavari 60 1 1.7 0 0 2 3.3 00 0 0 0.0 0 0 11 18.3 0 3152 4 6.7 0 2950

Kadapa 60 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 1 1.7 3000 1500 0 0.0 0 0 9000 1791 1044 3480 4700 2150 6400 Krishna 60 7 11.7 0 7 15 25.0 000 0 3 5.0 0 7833 3 5.0 0 3583 7 11.7 0 7417 8800 1933 Kurnool 60 4 6.7 0 3 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0

Nellore 60 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 5000 2500 1500 1500 Prakasham 45 0 0.0 0 0 1 2.2 0 0 1 2.2 0 7500 2 4.4 0 3750 0 0.0 0 0 3000 1500 Srikakulam 60 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 1 1.7 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 Visakhapatna m 56 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0

Vizianagaram 57 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 West 4100 1025 1105 6906 4110 4050 Godavari 60 2 0.0 0 0 8 13.3 063 6 0 0.0 0 0 20 33.3 0 1028 9 15.0 0 2250 4910 1753 4027 7598 1980 1414 2579 8439 Grand Total 875 27 3.1 00 6 53 6.1 063 2 14 1.6 00 3 60 6.9 00 4371 97 11.1 00 8791

11 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP Annexure 9.7 Milch Animals

% Milk % Milk Milk animal- Milk animal - Cow - animal- animal - % Cow - % Cow- Buffaloes - Cow- Local Project/Control Total Beneficiaries Buffaloes- Local Improved Buffaloes - Buffaloes- Improved Local Improved (Desavali) (Desavali) (Hybrids) Improved Local (Hybrids) (Desavali) (Hybrids) (Hybrids) (Desavali)

CONTROL 177 1 51 2 47 0.6 28.8 1.1 26.6

Anantapuram 15 0 1 0 4 0.0 6.7 0.0 26.7

Chittoor 15 0 0 0 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.7

East Godavari 15 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Kadapa 15 0 5 0 0 0.0 33.3 0.0 0.0

Krishna 15 1 10 0 2 6.7 66.7 0.0 13.3

Kurnool 15 0 5 0 1 0.0 33.3 0.0 6.7

Nellore 15 0 12 0 0 0.0 80.0 0.0 0.0

Prakasham 15 0 1 0 0 0.0 6.7 0.0 0.0

Srikakulam 15 0 0 2 2 0.0 0.0 13.3 13.3

Visakhapatnam 15 0 0 0 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 53.3

Vizianagaram 12 0 12 0 9 0.0 100.0 0.0 75.0

West Godavari 15 0 5 0 14 0.0 33.3 0.0 93.3

PROJECT 698 8 235 6 134 1.1 33.7 0.9 19.2

Anantapuram 60 0 8 0 6 0.0 13.3 0.0 10.0

Chittoor 60 0 20 0 22 0.0 33.3 0.0 36.7

East Godavari 60 0 9 0 4 0.0 15.0 0.0 6.7

12 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Kadapa 60 3 22 0 3 5.0 36.7 0.0 5.0

Krishna 60 0 37 0 5 0.0 61.7 0.0 8.3

Kurnool 60 2 21 0 2 3.3 35.0 0.0 3.3

Nellore 60 0 40 0 0 0.0 66.7 0.0 0.0

Prakasham 45 0 3 0 0 0.0 6.7 0.0 0.0

Srikakulam 60 0 0 5 13 0.0 0.0 8.3 21.7

Visakhapatnam 56 0 1 0 28 0.0 1.8 0.0 50.0

Vizianagaram 57 0 57 0 40 0.0 100.0 0.0 70.2

West Godavari 60 3 17 1 11 5.0 28.3 1.7 18.3

Grand Total 875 9 286 8 181 1.0 32.7 0.9 20.7

13 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP Annexure 9.8 Household Income

Agriculture - Agriculture from Ayacut Petty Service(G Leasing Dairy Total - from Animals Dairy own Other Total Project/Control and Artisan Busines ovt/ out Wages commissi HH NonAyacut / Poultry animals Income Income Rs. Influence s Private) land on area zone area

12400 CONTROL 177 8696420 2162885 175000 0 2008000 0 3700000 180000 244450 1849695 1869000 21009450

Anantapuram 15 1094400 430000 40000 0 0 0 252000 0 0 0 54000 1870400

Chittoor 15 1158816 205945 0 0 0 32000 0 0 0 477060 27000 1900821

East Godavari 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 510000 0 0 0 659000 1169000

Kadapa 15 55200 0 15000 0 180000 0 696000 0 58800 109200 596000 1710200

Krishna 15 1089925 53000 120000 0 1024000 0 59000 0 96150 225250 102000 2769325

Kurnool 15 2304801 134940 0 0 0 0 0 0 72000 49680 2561421

Nellore 15 366208 0 0 0 720000 0 930000 0 0 493200 270000 2779408

Prakasham 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 540000 180000 0 0 27000 747000

Srikakulam 15 1122100 63000 0 0 84000 0 473000 0 17500 40500 0 1800100

Visakhapatnam 15 465000 0 0 0 0 0 170000 0 0 70000 0 705000

Vizianagaram 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 70000 0 0 214000 50000 334000

West Godavari 15 1039970 1276000 0 0 0 92000 0 0 170805 84000 2662775

PROJECT 698 53905959 9444800 60000 420000 10367000 877000 16568500 117000 380875 10793906 5451750 108386790

Anantapuram 60 10339200 1205400 20000 0 0 15000 795000 32000 50000 7500 63000 12527100

Chittoor 60 6129012 236500 0 0 3206000 7000 415000 0 0 1605646 158000 11757158

East Godavari 60 2219680 2278000 0 0 0 95000 740000 0 0 489202 737000 6558882

14 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

Kadapa 60 317850 30000 0 0 1250000 10000 3480000 0 28350 488490 776000 6380690

Krishna 60 3706394 387000 0 0 1600000 0 120000 0 86400 469960 54000 6423754

Kurnool 60 13607173 196200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2909430 0 16712803

Nellore 60 2711050 307000 40000 0 2726000 70000 3322000 45000 0 2122510 1131750 12475310

Prakasham 45 0 711300 0 420000 840000 290000 2769000 40000 31500 0 1450000 6551800

Srikakulam 60 1158600 15000 0 0 594000 0 2944500 0 184625 724240 598000 6218965

Visakhapatnam 56 1890000 0 0 0 0 0 610000 0 0 292000 70000 2862000

Vizianagaram 57 610000 0 0 0 0 0 590000 0 0 780000 360000 2340000

West Godavari 60 11217000 4078400 0 0 151000 390000 783000 0 0 904928 54000 17578328 1237500 10010 2026850 1264360 Grand Total 875 62602379 11607685 235000 420000 0 00 0 297000 625325 1 7320750 129396240

15 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP Annexure 9.9 Househod consumption pattern

Other Events Total Food Housing Fuel Interest Other food Education Clothing Health Transport Electricity and Total Nos. Project/Control Beneficiaries Grains / rental wood charges Expnd items festivals

31287 29879 21000 20923 18509 89730 21554 16856 CONTROL 177 75 45 00 3525100 45 14 1799972 0 699708 00 80 58000 22981139

Anantapuram 15 282000 191000 0 157000 146000 157000 102000 188700 34900 53500 115000 36000 1463100

Chittoor 15 516000 245000 0 580000 228000 275000 117000 72700 46800 158000 139000 0 2377500

East Godavari 15 239000 253000 0 156000 173000 96000 200000 69200 95000 95000 122500 0 1498700

Kadapa 15 514000 342000 0 261600 223500 189000 132500 56000 31100 231000 279000 6000 2265700

Krishna 15 324400 438000 0 1163000 382000 301000 392000 66600 133500 613000 189000 0 4002500

Kurnool 15 220880 128300 0 170000 87800 63999 67500 49750 44550 2400 120000 6000 961179

Nellore 15 236000 164000 0 300000 187000 192500 79200 58000 58200 0 119000 0 1393900

Prakasham 15 158000 186000 0 73000 115000 97000 76000 57200 37700 803500 115000 10000 1728400

210000 Srikakulam 15 132495 202645 0 218500 151045 95415 137472 84650 84558 50000 184180 0 3440960

Visakhapatnam 15 114000 109000 0 51000 97000 74000 108500 51000 30900 0 95000 0 730400

Vizianagaram 12 126000 130000 0 99000 78000 123000 65000 35500 0 117000 0 773500

West Godavari 15 266000 599000 0 395000 203000 232000 264800 78500 67000 149000 91000 0 2345300

PROJECT 698 132420 135269 652300 16912010 936276 110317 7573881 388620 3095809 130223 990506 552100 108633865

16 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

64 23 0 4 15 8 30 1

111600 Anantapuram 60 0 766000 0 800000 634000 764000 469000 725300 244950 485000 487000 232000 6723250 207600 147660 102950 348550 Chittoor 60 0 0 10000 1877300 903000 0 1055200 456500 459980 0 907800 0 13737380 109500 161100 113500 East Godavari 60 0 0 0 1030000 777000 0 881000 337400 344920 655230 561000 20000 8447550 131400 122230 112100 150900 125000 Kadapa 60 0 0 300000 1878000 0 0 737500 269950 221660 109500 0 146500 10079410 166100 259750 131100 173700 308720 195700 Krishna 60 0 0 100000 2076000 0 0 645000 320900 293000 0 0 16500 15802100 302000 Kurnool 60 802144 597800 0 1482000 625200 342500 247100 231600 189810 21500 530000 0 8089654 168300 Nellore 60 0 949000 40000 1165000 867000 857000 502800 263000 212560 779400 789000 3000 8110760 106700 108700 107850 150950 Prakasham 45 0 0 0 903000 603000 0 452600 200900 152700 0 566000 34000 7654200 300500 Srikakulam 60 394920 776723 0 413310 527564 364215 263681 271458 201229 204000 413261 70100 6905461

Visakhapatnam 56 434000 432000 0 207000 348000 298000 235000 172000 165300 12400 337000 20000 2660700

Vizianagaram 57 590000 587000 0 552400 444000 368000 543000 270500 180100 2400 491000 10000 4038400 100900 142400 120200 154900 267070 161600 West Godavari 60 0 0 48000 4528000 0 0 1542000 366700 429600 0 0 0 16385000 16370 16514 86230 2043711 11455 12882 47835 15177 11590 61010 Grand Total 875 839 868 00 0 109 629 9373853 08 3795517 730 741 0 131615004

17 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP Annexure 9.10 Household Borrowing sources – District wise Project/Control Total Banks Cooperative societies SHGs Friends Money lenders Traders Micro finance Others CONTROL 177 92 2 15 11 7 0 0 0 Anantapuram 15 15 0 6 0 0 0 0 Chittoor 15 9 0 4 5 0 0 0 0 East Godavari 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Kadapa 15 6 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 Krishna 15 9 2 3 2 0 0 0 0 Kurnool 15 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nellore 15 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Prakasham 15 13 0 1 2 7 0 0 0 Srikakulam 15 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Visakhapatnam 15 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vizianagaram 12 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 West Godavari 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PROJECT 698 395 27 154 43 9 3 0 11 Anantapuram 60 58 2 49 0 0 0 0 1 Chittoor 60 42 1 31 13 3 1 0 0 East Godavari 60 5 6 3 4 1 0 0 2 Kadapa 60 40 0 21 6 0 0 0 0 Krishna 60 43 7 14 7 3 0 0 4 Kurnool 60 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nellore 60 38 1 18 0 0 0 0 0 Prakasham 45 20 4 11 8 2 1 0 3 Srikakulam 60 14 5 1 4 0 1 0 1 Visakhapatnam 56 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vizianagaram 57 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 West Godavari 60 10 1 6 1 0 0 0 0 Grand Total 875 487 29 169 54 16 3 0 11

18 APIIATP

Andhra Pradesh Integrated Irrigation Agriculture Transformation Project. Govt of AP

19 APIIATP