Grotius and Late Medieval Ius Commune on Rebellion and Civil War

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Grotius and Late Medieval Ius Commune on Rebellion and Civil War Grotiana 41 (2) 2020, p. 371-389 Grotius and Late Medieval Ius Commune on Rebellion and Civil War Dante Fedele, Chargé de recherche Univ. Lille, CNRS, UMR 8025 – CHJ – Centre d’histoire judiciaire, F-59000 Lille, France [email protected] Abstract: This paper explores the presence of late medieval ius commune in Grotius’s thought on the use of force in internal strife and war, based on De iure belli ac pacis (1625). To this end, it examines Grotius’s use of ius commune sources, and considers some similar sources, which he does not actually cite, but which relate to his discussion. By clarifying Grotius’s selection and use of ius commune sources, the paper intends to contribute to the achievement of a double aim: firstly, to determine the place of rebellion and civil war in De iure belli ac pacis, especially in relation to (external) war; and, secondly, to assess Grotius’s approach to the two former issues, particularly with regard to the criteria by which a distinction between rebellion and civil war can be drawn, and to the effects of this distinction. Keywords: Grotius, Ius commune, Rebellion, Civil War, Use of force This paper explores the presence of late medieval ius commune in Grotius’s thought on the use of force in internal strife and war, based on De iure belli ac pacis (1625). To this end, it examines Grotius’s use of ius commune sources, and considers some similar sources, which he does not actually cite, but which relate to his discussion and can be fruitfully studied to broaden the scope of the analysis. By clarifying Grotius’s selection and use of ius commune sources, the paper intends to contribute to the achievement of a double aim: firstly, to determine the place of rebellion and civil war in De iure belli ac pacis, especially in relation to (external) war; and, secondly, to assess Grotius’s approach to the two former issues, particularly with regard to the criteria by which a distinction between rebellion and civil war can be drawn, and to the effects of this distinction. One obvious starting point for this kind of investigation is Robert Feenstra’s annotation of De iure belli ac pacis, which guides us neatly through the numerous sources cited by Grotius in his magnum opus, and enables the reader to appreciate the strong presence of ius commune jurisprudence.1 Feenstra also provided an overview of this subject in an 1 See H. Grotius, De iure belli ac pacis libri tres, curavit B.J.A. De Kanter - Van Hettinga Tromp (1939), annotationes novas addiderunt R. Feenstra et C.E. Persenaire (Aalen: Scientia Verlag, 1993), hereafter cited as 1 Grotiana 41 (2) 2020, p. 371-389 article which appeared in 1992, in which he demonstrates that Grotius sometimes had direct knowledge of the works he cited (although when writing De iure belli ac pacis he had no longer access to his personal library), and sometimes relied on second-hand references to medieval jurists (in the works of early modern scholars like Francisco de Vitoria, Alberico Gentili, Diego de Covarrubias and Fernando Vázquez de Menchaca, in particular).2 A ground-breaking study in the field – predating Feenstra – was Peter Haggenmacher’s Grotius et la doctrine de la guerre juste, which is especially relevant to our analysis insofar as it focuses on war and the use of force, and – through careful analysis of both De iure praedae and De iure belli ac pacis – assesses the presence of ius commune authorities in these works.3 Subsequently, James Muldoon studied Grotius’s use of medieval canon law in Mare liberum (1609), in order to show how the Dutch jurist, although he used the same source material as his Spanish predecessors, actually elaborated a different conception of the international order, criticising the idea of a trade monopoly based on papal donation, and asserting a basis for trade freedom in natural law.4 More recently, Robert Fredona has investigated the presence of late medieval jurisprudence in Mare liberum, insisting on the ‘technical legal character’ of this work and its scholarly apparatus, which includes ‘an average of 2.25 mentions’ of Roman, canon, and feudal law texts or commentaries per page, and features Bartolus de Sassoferrato and Baldus de Ubaldis as the most cited authors of that tradition.5 IBP. Translations are from H. Grotius, De jure belli ac pacis libri tres, transl. F.W. Kelsey (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1925). 2 See R. Feenstra, ‘Ius commune et droit comparé chez Grotius: nouvelles remarques sur les sources citées dans ses ouvrages juridiques, à propos d’une réimpression du De iure belli ac pacis’ (1992), in Id., Legal Scholarship and Doctrines of Private Law, 13th-18th Centuries (Aldershot: Variorum, 1996). See also Feenstra’s Introduction to H. Grotius, Mare Liberum, 1609-2009: Original Latin Text [...] and Modern English Translation, ed. R. Feenstra (Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2009), pp. LVI-LIX. Further studies on Grotius by Feenstra are mentioned in A. Wijffels, ‘Legal Scholastic and Humanist Influences on Grotius’, in The Cambridge Companion to Hugo Grotius, ed. R. Lesaffer and J. Nijman (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming). On Grotius’s working method, see M.J. van Ittersum, ‘The Working Methods of Hugo Grotius: Which Sources Did He Use and How Did He Use Them in His Early Writings on Natural Law Theory?’, in Reassessing Legal Humanism and its Claims. Petere Fontes?, ed. P.J. du Plessis and J.W. Cairns (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2016), pp. 154-93. 3 See P. Haggenmacher, Grotius et la doctrine de la guerre juste (Paris: PUF, 1983). See also Id., ‘Grotius and Gentili: A Reassessment of Thomas E. Holland’s Inaugural Lecture’, in Hugo Grotius and International Relations, ed. H. Bull, B. Kingsbury and A. Roberts (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990), pp. 133-76. 4 See J. Muldoon, ‘Hugo Grotius, Medieval Canon Law and the Creation of Modern International Law’, in Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Medieval Canon Law, Munich, 13-18 July 1992, ed. P. Landau and J. Mueller (Città del Vaticano: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, 1997), pp. 1155-65, with further references. On the issue of free trade in Grotius’s thought, however, see M. Somos, ‘Open and Closed Seas: The Grotius-Selden Dialogue at the Heart of Liberal Imperialism’, in Empire and Legal Thought. Ideas and Institutions from Antiquity to Modernity, ed. E. Cavanagh (Leiden/Boston: Brill/Nijhoff, 2020), pp. 322-61. 5 See R. Fredona, ‘Angelo degli Ubaldi and the Gulf of the Venetians: Custom, Commerce, and the Control of the Sea Before Grotius’, in New Perspectives on the History of Political Economy, ed. R. Fredona and S.A. Reinert (Cham: Plagrave Macmillan, 2018), pp. 29-73: 30. Taking his lead from a reference found in H. Grotius, Mare liberum, p. 101 (p. 39 in the original edition of 1609), Fredona examines in particular Angelus de Ubaldis’ consilium 290 (289 in some incunabula). Angelus’s opinion deals with a clause of the peace treaty concluded in 1355 between Venice and Genoa, which regulated the freedom of navigation in the Adriatic and the Tyrrhenian, and was later also included in the treaty entered into by the two cities in 1381. Since Grotius, as already noted by Feenstra, copied the reference to Angelus from Giovanni Francesco Balbo’s Tractatus de 2 Grotiana 41 (2) 2020, p. 371-389 Grotius’s categorisation of war in De iure belli ac pacis is well known.6 He starts from a distinction between ‘private war’ (fought by private persons), ‘public war’ (fought by people invested with jurisdiction) and ‘mixed war’ (which is private on the one side, and public on the other). Public war is then divided into two sub-categories, i.e. ‘formal (solenne)’ on the one hand (which requires two conditions: a formal declaration of war, and the sovereignty of both belligerent parties),7 and ‘less formal (minus solenne)’ on the other (which is defined by the absence of either of these conditions). Internal strife and war fall under the category of ‘mixed war’ – they are, in fact, the only instance of mixed war that Grotius discusses (I.4). However, he also examines them in his analysis of ‘less formal public war’ (I.3). Actually, these two chapters seem to reflect different perspectives: in chapter 3 Grotius considers rebellion from the viewpoint of the public official (who has the authority to repress rebellion), whereas in chapter 4 he considers the same issue from the viewpoint of private persons (who normally enjoy no right of resistance). Internal strife and war are also touched upon in other passages of De iure belli ac pacis, including those on the right to send ambassadors (II.18.2.3), the right of burial (II.19.4), going to war on behalf of others (II.25.8), formal war (III.3.1), the right to appropriate objects captured in war (III.6.27), the rights over prisoners of war (III.7.5.3 and III.7.7), and the keeping of good faith with enemies (III.19.6-10). This paper is divided into two parts. In the first, it deals with rebellion and its relation to the notion of war (bellum); in the second, it concentrates on civil war and – in particular – some medieval antecedents of Grotius’s conceptualisation of the two belligerent parties as two distinct gentes. Rebellion When he discusses less formal public war, in I.3.4, Grotius begins by presenting the opinion that not every public official has the authority to ‘wage war for the protection of the people entrusted to his charge’, since war can only be waged under the authority of the holder of the ‘sovereign power in the state (summa in civitate potestatem)’.8 He refers to Plato’s Laws (12.7), and to both Roman and canon law: lex Iulia maiestatis is cited,9 as are a constitution by Valentinian and Valens (from 364), and an excerpt from Augustin included in Gratian’s Decretum.10 All of these sources state that the order to take up arms can only be issued by the princeps – a principle which is duly emphasised by the glosses to all these Roman and praescriptione, Fredona uses this as a case-study about Grotius’s ‘second-hand erudition’, see ibid., p.
Recommended publications
  • The King Heir. Claiming Vacant Estate Succession in Europe and in the Spanish World (13Th-18Th Centuries)
    Français Partager CATALOGUE Tout ACCUEIL DES 549 OPENEDITION SEARCH OpenEdition REVUES Accueil L’Atelier du CRH 22 The King Heir. Claiming Vacant Es... L’Atelier du Centre de recherches historiques Revue électronique du CRH 22 | 2020 : Sous tutelle. Biens sans maître et successions vacantes dans une perspective comparative, XIIIe-XXe siècles The King Heir. Claiming Vacant Estate Succession in Europe and in the Spanish World (13th-18th Centuries) Le roi héritier. Les revendications sur la succession vacante en Europe et dans le Monde espagnol XIIIe - XVIIIe siècles ALESSANDRO BUONO https://doi.org/10.4000/acrh.10917 Résumés English Français This article deals with the claims on “vacant successions” (bona vacantia) and on “property of none” (res nullius) in early modern Europe, with a focus on the case of the Spanish monarchy between the thirteenth and eighteenth centuries (both in the old and in the new world). After briefly reconstructing the legal debate on the matter, the essay tries to demonstrate how the control over successions was at the centre of competing and conflicting claims, among which that of the “king heir”. In the end, what the analysis of this problem shows is that the discontinuity created by the inability of human beings to manage family and community goods and resources was a constant threat to the corporate membership- based societies of those times. Therefore, a number of corporate bodies and institutions (such as the Spanish Juzgado de bienes de difuntos) were encouraged to mobilize in order to ensure that no patrimony were left without an owner, and that there was always someone responsible for responding to the obligations deriving from the ownership of goods.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization and Eschatological Realism from Dante to Petrarch
    The Italianist ISSN: 0261-4340 (Print) 1748-619X (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/yita20 Characterization and eschatological realism from Dante to Petrarch Laurence Hooper To cite this article: Laurence Hooper (2017) Characterization and eschatological realism from Dante to Petrarch, The Italianist, 37:3, 289-307, DOI: 10.1080/02614340.2017.1407987 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/02614340.2017.1407987 Published online: 16 Mar 2017. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=yita20 THE ITALIANIST, 2017 VOL. 37, NO. 3, 289–307 https://doi.org/10.1080/02614340.2017.1407987 Characterization and eschatological realism from Dante to Petrarch Laurence Hooper Dartmouth College, USA ABSTRACT KEYWORDS This article considers the characterization of blessed souls in Characterization; beatific Dante’s Commedia (1307–21) and Petrarch’s Canzoniere vision; verisimilitude; legal (c. 1356–74) and Triumphi (c. 1352–74). It argues that fiction; Dante; Petrarch eschatological realism – the detailed representation of souls in – PAROLE CHIAVE the afterlife lies at the heart of these three works, each of Caratterizzazione; visione which depicts a deceased beloved who now resides in beatifica; verosimiglianza; Paradise. Dante’s Paradiso navigates a range of doctrinal and fictio iuris; Dante; Petrarca literary challenges to incorporate its blessed characters into the poem’s continuum of interlocutors. Although the Commedia culminates with a first-person, mystical experience, the structural importance of third-person voices to the canticle demonstrates the centrality of realist characterization to the overall project.
    [Show full text]
  • Les Lectures Des Théologiens Moralistes À La Fin Du Xvie
    Mémoire 2 professionnel / septembre 2014 Spécialité - cultures de l’écrit et de l’image Mention - sciences de l’information et des bibliothèques Domaine - sciences humaines et sociales Diplôme national de master Professeur d'histoire moderne – UniversitéPhilippe Lyon 2 Martin ENSSIB Conservateur d’État – Bibliothèque cantonaleFabienneSous Henryot de direction la et universitaire de Lausanne / Lucie HUMEAU Gregory Sayer) / Annexes (Jean Benedicti, Francisco de Toledo, moralistes à la fin du XVI Les lectures des théologiens e siècle Droits d’auteurs Cette création est mise à disposition selon le Contrat : Paternité-Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale-Pas de Modification 2.0 France disponible en ligne http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/fr/ ou par courrier postal à Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California 94105, USA. HUMEAU Lucie | Master 2 CEI | Mémoire de maîtrise | septembre 2014 - 2 - Sommaire SOURCES........................................................................................................................5 TABLE DES ANNEXES...............................................................................................7 TABLE DES MATIÈRES........................................................................................217 HUMEAU Lucie | Master 2 CEI | Mémoire de maîtrise | septembre 2014 - 3 - Sources Les manuels de confession : • BENEDICTI, Jean, La somme des pechez, et le remede d'icevx. Comprenant tous les cas de conscience, & la resolution des doubtes touchant les Pechez,
    [Show full text]
  • Turtas, Raimondo (1988) Umanisti Sassaresi Del '500: Le "Biblioteche" Di Giovanni Francesco Fara E Alessio Fontana
    Cadoni, Enzo; Turtas, Raimondo (1988) Umanisti sassaresi del '500: le "biblioteche" di Giovanni Francesco Fara e Alessio Fontana. Sassari, Edizioni Gallizzi. 240 p., 12 p. di tav. (Quaderni di Sandalion, 2). http://eprints.uniss.it/7732/ Documento digitalizzato dallo Staff di UnissResearch Questo li bro avvia un piano mollo ambizioso articolato su duf' diremici: la prima vor· l"!! Enzo Cadoni - Raimondo Turtas rebbe aver ... come punto d 'arrivo la pubblicazion ... di tutti gli inventari librari redatti • in Sardegna nd corso de! XVI secolo, al fine di offrire agli studiosi d ... Ua cultuni scritta n nell'isola un cvrpl/$ il piu possibile completo di tutto il patrimonio librario esistente DI in questo ste s50 periodo in Sard egna. La seconda, che si spera di compl ... tar ...... ntro il 1991, si propone l'edizion ... critica (ormai già avviata) ddle opere di Giovanni Fran· Co cesco Fara, il fondai or... della conoscenza scientifica della storia e della geogr:lfia della g lhnanisti Sassaresi del '500 Sardegna. In particolare questo volume è dedicalO a due ~rsonalità sassaresi eh ... si formarono •• Le -biblioteche. culturalmente prima che nell a nostra ciu à venisse aperto il collegio gesuitico destinato I a diveni are, nei primi dl."CCnni del 1600, l'Università di Sassari. Essi sono r3ppresen· di Giovanni Francesco Fara tativi di un groppo non molto foho di intellettuali sardi che compirono gli studi in ••= e Alessio Fontana uno dei due versanti allora aprrti ai giovani desiderosi di istruzione, quello spagnolo e quello ilaliano. AI primo si rivolse Alessio Fontana che, pur inserilO nella burocrazia imperiale al servizio del principe reggente Filippo e dello stesso imperatore Carlo V, si mantenne costantemente attenlO ai fermenli della cuhura classica del tardo Rinasci­ mento mediata attraverso la visione erasmbna.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 the Ignorant Seller's Liability for Latent Defects: One
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DSpace at VU 8 The Ignorant Seller’s Liability for Latent Defects: One Regula or Various Sets of Rules? Jan Hallebeek* A. INTRODUCTION B. ROMANLAW (1) Traces of historical developments in the Corpus iuris (2) Justinianic law C. THE ERA OF THE GLOSSATORS (1) Early legal scholarship (2) Placentinus and Johannes Bassianus (3) Azo (4) The last generation of glossators (5) Conclusions (a) Actio empti; actio quanti minoris (b) Praetorian remedies (c) The view of Accursius D. FROM THE GLOSSA ORDINARIA TO THE FOURTEENTH CENTURY (1) Romano-canonical procedure (2) The school of Orleans and Cinus E. THE ERA OF THE COMMENTATORS (1) Liability of the ignorant seller in case oflatent defects (2) The scope of the Aedilician actio quanti minoris (3) Claiming price reduction: one remedy or various sets of rules? F. CONCLUSIONS * The author is grateful to Kees Bezemer (Leiden) and Wim Decock (Leuven) for their comments on a draft version of this paper and to Margaret Hewett (Cape Town) for correcting the English and for further advice. 170 EUP_Cairns_09_Ch8.indd 170 24/02/2010 14:50 the ignorant seller’s liability for latent defects 171 A. INTRODUCTION In 1999 a European Directive was issued that required specific protection for the buyer of consumer goods. This was subsequently implemented in the various European jurisdictions. When repair or replacement of these goods, in the case of non-conformity, is impossible or cannot be demanded or when the seller refuses to provide either of these solutions, the buyer has the remedies of reduction in price and rescission.1 The corresponding liability of the seller does not necessarily depend on explicit warranties, contractual clauses or any kind of malicious intent (mens rea) on his side, but is simply imposed by the law or based on an implied warranty.
    [Show full text]
  • Cities of Strangers Miri Rubin Index More Information Www
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-48123-6 — Cities of Strangers Miri Rubin Index More Information Index Aachen, 3 bigamy, 76 adultery, 76, 80, 87 Birger Jarl, 28 Agen, 38, 80 bishops, authority of, 2, 63 Agnes (wife of Michael Norton), 80 Black African slaves, 88 Agostino Novello, 74–5 Black Death, 24, 47, 55, 60 Albanians, 69 Bodel, Jean, 10 Albertanus, 10 Boileau, Etienne, 78 Alberto di Francesco, 79 Bolesƚaw V of Poland, 13 Alfonso V of Aragon, 48 Bologna, 7, 33, 36, 43 Ancona, 35 Bona, 85 Andrew III of Hungary, 54 The Book of Sir Thomas More (Shakespeare), Angela da Foligno, 83 97 Antonino of Florence, 67 The Book of the City of Women (Christine de Arles, 4 Pizan), 72 Arras, 4, 10 Boone, Marc, 48 artisan and craft groups, 40, 48, 75–9 Brescia, 63 Art of Speaking and Keeping Silent Brno, 68 (Albertanus), 10 brothels, 87, 89–90 Ascheri, Mario, 33 Bruges, 5, 7, 48, 77, 83 Ascoli Piceno, 44, 56 Brunetto Latini, 9–10, 26 Augustine of Hippo, 52 Buda, 12–13, 28, 37, 77, 81, 88 Auragne, 84 burgage plots, 5 Auxonne, 48 burial rituals, 77, 80 Avignon, 4, 7, 17, 30, 46, 49, 93 Àvila, 58 Cairo Montenotte, 40, 106 Camerino, 35, 43, 90, 121 Baldus de Ubaldis, 17 Campbell, Bruce, 47 bankers. See moneylenders and bankers Carcassone, 60, 119 Barcelona, 55, 73 Catherine of Siena, 83 Barnim, Duke of Pomerania, 5 Cavallar, Oswaldo, 57 Bartholomew ‘the English’,6 Cecina, 37, 43 Bartolus of Sassoferrato, 10, 16, 56 Cellarius, Christianus, 96–7 baths and bathing, 68 Cerutti, Simona, 1 Beatrice (daughter of Pieter de Wilde), 78 Charles IV, Holy Roman Emperor,
    [Show full text]
  • IMAGES of LEGAL HUMANISM Douglas J
    Document generated on 09/23/2021 1:04 p.m. Surfaces IMAGES OF LEGAL HUMANISM Douglas J. Osler TROISIÈME CONGRÈS INTERNATIONAL SUR LE DISCOURS Article abstract HUMANISTE. LA RÉSISTANCE HUMANISTE AU DOGMATISME Legal humanism is an expression generally used to refer to the study of Roman AUJOURD’HUI ET À LA FIN DU MOYEN ÂGE law by 16th Century philologists. Coming a century an a half after what is THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMANISTIC generally taken to be the birth of humanism, it is generally understood to be DISCOURSE. HUMANISTIC RESISTANCE TO DOGMATISM TODAY part of humanism mostly in its interest for the historical interpretation of Latin AND AT THE END OF THE MIDDLE AGES texts rather than for participating in the value orientation of humanism. Volume 9, 2001 Strangely enough, legal history has taken the philological work of legal humanism for granted not seeing that legal humanism was itself inscribed in history. First, we should note that when it was being developed in the 16th URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1065066ar Century, this philological work in Roman law was marginal if one compares DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1065066ar publications in that field to publications of medieval Italian jurisprudence. Secondly, legal history has tended to diminish the presence of interpretation in See table of contents the work of legal humanists who probably more than is generally acknowledged adapted to their times the Latin texts inventing values which have nothing to do with the Roman sources. Legal humanism has never been Publisher(s) used to mean the legal aspects of humanitarianism and probably needn’t to be.
    [Show full text]
  • Farewell to Freedom:A Western Genealogy of Liberty
    RICCARDO BALDISSONE FAREWELL to FREEDOM A Western Genealogy of Liberty Farewell to Freedom: A Western Genealogy of Liberty Riccardo Baldissone University of Westminster Press www.uwestminsterpress.co.uk Published by University of Westminster Press 115 New Cavendish Street London W1W 6UW www.uwestminsterpress.co.uk Text © Riccardo Baldissone 2018 First published 2018 Cover: Diana Jarvis Image: ‘Perseus Freeing Andromeda’, courtesy of Warburg Institute Printed in the UK by Lightning Source Ltd. Print and digital versions typeset by Siliconchips Services Ltd. ISBN (Paperback): 978-1-911534-60-0 ISBN (PDF) 978-1-911534-61-7 ISBN (ePUB): 978-1-911534-62-4 ISBN (Kindle): 978-1-911534-63-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/book15 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nc-nd/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA. This licence allows for copying and distributing the work, providing author attribution is clearly stated, that you are not using the material for commercial pur- poses, and that modified versions are not distributed. The full text of this book has been peer-reviewed to ensure high academic standards. For full review policies, see: http://www.uwestminsterpress.co.uk/site/publish/ Suggested citation: Baldissone, R 2018 Farewell to Freedom: A Western Genealogy of Liberty. London: University of Westminster Press. DOI: https://doi. org/10.16997/book15. License: CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 To read the free, open access version of this book online, visit https://doi.org/10.16997/book15 or scan this QR code with your mobile device: to my mother, my lover, and my daughter contaminari decere fabulasα Il n’y a point de mot qui aît reçû plus de différentes significations, & qui aît frappé les esprits de tant de manières, que celui de Libertéβ α [I]t is proper to contaminate stories.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birth of Territory
    the birth of territory The Birth of Territory stuart elden the university of chicago press chicago and london Stuart Elden is professor of political theory and geography at the University of Warwick. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 60637 The University of Chicago Press, Ltd., London © 2013 by The University of Chicago All rights reserved. Published 2013. Printed in the United States of America 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 1 2 3 4 5 isbn-13: 978-0-226-20256-3 (cloth) isbn-13: 978-0-226-20257-0 (paper) isbn-13: 978-0-226-04128-5 (e-book) Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Elden, Stuart, 1971- The birth of territory / Stuart Elden. pages. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 978-0-226-20256-3 (cloth : alk. paper)—isbn 978-0-226-20257-0 (pbk. : alk. paper)—isbn 978-0-226-04128-5 (e-book) 1. Political geography. 2. Geography, Ancient. 3. Geography, Medieval. I. Title. jc319.e44 2013 320.1’2—dc23 2013005902 This paper meets the requirements of ansi/niso z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper). contents Acknowledgments ix Introduction 1 Part I 19 1. The Polis and the Khora 21 Autochthony and the Myth of Origins 21 Antigone and the Polis 26 The Reforms of Kleisthenes 31 Plato’s Laws 37 Aristotle’s Politics 42 Site and Community 47 2. From Urbis to Imperium 53 Caesar and the Terrain of War 55 Cicero and the Res Publica 60 The Historians: Sallust, Livy, Tacitus 67 Augustus and Imperium 75 The Limes of the Imperium 82 Part II 97 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Conspiracy in Florence, 1340-1382 A
    POLITICAL CONSPIRACY IN FLORENCE, 1340-1382 A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Robert A. Fredona February 2010 © 2010 Robert A. Fredona POLITICAL CONSPIRACY IN FLORENCE, 1340-82 Robert A. Fredona, Ph. D. Cornell University 2010 This dissertation examines the role of secret practices of opposition in the urban politics of Florence between 1340 and 1382. It is based on a wide variety of printed and archival sources, including chronicles, judicial records, government enactments, the records of consultative assemblies, statutes, chancery letters, tax records, private diaries and account books, and the ad hoc opinions (consilia) of jurists. Over the course of four chapters, it presents three major arguments: (1) Conspiracy, a central mechanism of political change and the predominant expression of political dissent in the city, remained primarily a function of the factionalism that had shattered the medieval commune, although it was now practiced not as open warfare but secret resistance. (2) Conspiracies were especially common when the city was ruled by popular governments, which faced almost constant conspiratorial resistance from elite factions that been expelled from the city or had had their political power restricted, while also inspiring increased worker unrest and secret labor organization. (3) Although historians have often located the origins of the “state” in the late medieval and early Renaissance cities of northern and central Italy, the prevalence of secret political opposition, the strength of conspirators and their allies, and the ability of conspiratorial networks, large worker congregations, and even powerful families to vie with weak regimes for power and legitimacy seriously calls this into question.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 X 10.Long.P65
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-84979-1 - Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought Edited by Annabel Brett and James Tully Index More information Index Acciaiuoli, Donato 180–1 objections to 182, 183–4 Accolti, Benedetto 9 on citizenship/equality 42, 46 active citizenship, notion of 43–4 on democracy 176–7, 196, 199, 217 Aegidius Romanus (Giles of Rome) 123–4 Politics 42, 97, 197, 239, 251–2, 254 Aeschines 77 subversion by Western theorists 205–6 Aeschylus 204, 205–6 Western commentaries/translations 120–3, Agamemnon 202 125 agency, theories of 23, 27–8, 31–2 armed resistance, permissibility of 150–2, authorial 20, 26–7, 28 154–8, 160–1, 162, 167–9 Albada, Aggaeus van 157, 158, 160 Armitage, David x, 249, 250 Albert the Great (Albertus Magnus) 123, 134 Ashcraft, Richard 11, 167 Alcibiades 202 Astell, Mary 15–16 Alen¸con,duke of 81 Athens, political system/constitution 176–7, Alexander, James 12 178, 196, 199, 200 Allen, J. W. 150 d’Aubign´e,Agrippa 86 Almain, Jacques 14, 109, 117, 140, 143, 144, Auden, W. H. 240 152 Augustine, St 40, 116 Althusius, Johannes 206, 251 Augustus, Emperor 178 American Indians, discussion of 142, 144, Austin, J. L. (linguistic philosopher) ix, 4, 20, 145–6 25–6, 29, 58, 242 anarchy, international, Hobbes as theorist of Austin, John (nineteenth-century legal 224, 228, 231–3 theorist) 232 Antichrist, tyrants/popes viewed as 165–6 authority, legal treatment of 126, 127–8, Antifoni, Enrico 54 129 Aquinas, Thomas, St 42, 115, 116, 125–6, see also sovereignty 128, 129, 132–3, 136, 137, 144, 145,
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Canon Law on Ius Commune in Its Formative Period
    THE INFLUENCE OF CANON LAW ON IUS COMMUNE IN ITS FORMATIVE PERIOD Sami Mehmeti Faculty of Law, South East European University, Tetovo E-mail: [email protected] DOI: 10.1515/seeur-2015-0034 Abstract In the Medieval period, Roman law and canon law formed ius commune or the common European law. The similarity between Roman and canon law was that they used the same methods and the difference was that they relied on different authoritative texts. In their works canonists and civilists combined the ancient Greek achievements in philosophy with the Roman achievements in the field of law. Canonists were the first who carried out research on the distinctions between various legal sources and systematized them according to a hierarchical order. The Medieval civilists sought solutions in canon law for a large number of problems that Justinian’s Codification did not hinge on or did it only superficially. Solutions offered by canon law were accepted not only in the civil law of Continental Europe, but also in the English law. Key words: Canon law, Roman law, ius commune, Decretum, Corpus iuris civilis 1. Introduction Between the 11th and 14th centuries, the Catholic Church was not only the largest and most organized public institution in Western Europe, but it also had the wealthiest intellectual resources and the most efficient legal system (Deanesly, 1969, pp. 121-130). For medieval lawyers, Roman law and canon law formed ius commune or the common law. The classical canon law used 155 SEEU Review | Volume 11 | Issue 2 | 2015 the same methods as those of the medieval civilists.
    [Show full text]