DOCSLIB.ORG

Surgicalwoundclassificationtree.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Surgicalwoundclassificationtree.Pdf CONTINUING EDUCATION Clinical Issues 1.7 www.aorn.org/CE SHARON A. VAN WICKLIN, MSN, RN, CNOR, CRNFA(E), CPSN-R, PLNC; SCOTT A. BRUBAKER, CTBS Continuing Education Contact Hours Approvals indicates that continuing education (CE) contact hours are This program meets criteria for CNOR and CRNFA recerti- available for this activity. Earn the CE contact hours by fication, as well as other CE requirements. reading this article, reviewing the purpose/goal and objectives, and completing the online Learner Evaluation at http:// AORN is provider-approved by the California Board of www.aorn.org/CE. Each applicant who successfully completes Registered Nursing, Provider Number CEP 13019. Check this program can immediately print a certificate of completion. with your state board of nursing for acceptance of this activity for relicensure. Event: #15532 Session: #0001 Fee: Members $13.60, Nonmembers $27.20 Conflict-of-Interest Disclosures The contact hours for this article expire September 30, 2018. Sharon A. Van Wicklin, MSN, RN, CNOR, CRNFA(E), Pricing is subject to change. CPSN-R, PLNC, and Scott A. Brubaker, CTBS, have no declared affiliations that could be perceived as posing a po- fl Purpose/Goal tential con ict of interest in the publication of this article. To provide the learner with knowledge of AORN’s guidelines The behavioral objectives for this program were created by related to surgical wound classification; storing and using Helen Starbuck Pashley, MA, BSN, CNOR, clinical editor, small, prefilled containers of formalin in the OR; latex-free with consultation from Susan Bakewell, MS, RN-BC, direc- environments for tissue recovery and organ procurement tor, Perioperative Education. Ms Starbuck Pashley and Ms procedures; covering facial hair in semirestricted and restricted Bakewell have no declared affiliations that could be perceived areas; and covering ears in semirestricted and restricted areas. as posing potential conflicts of interest in the publication of this article. Objectives 1. Discuss practices that could jeopardize safety in the peri- operative area. Sponsorship or Commercial Support 2. Discuss common areas of concern that relate to perioper- No sponsorship or commercial support was received for this ative best practices. article. 3. Describe implementation of evidence-based practice in relation to perioperative nursing care. Disclaimer Accreditation AORN recognizes these activities as CE for RNs. This AORN is accredited as a provider of continuing nursing ed- recognition does not imply that AORN or the American ucation by the American Nurses Credentialing Center’s Nurses Credentialing Center approves or endorses products Commission on Accreditation. mentioned in the activity. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2015.06.002 ª AORN, Inc, 2015 www.aornjournal.org AORN Journal j 299 CLINICAL ISSUES 1.7 www.aorn.org/CE THIS MONTH Surgical wound classification Key words: wound classification, documentation, surgical site infection. Storing and using small, prefilled containers of formalin in the OR Key words: formalin, formaldehyde, eyewash stations, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Latex-free environments for tissue recovery and organ procurement procedures Key words: allografts, organ donation, tissue recovery, latex sensitivity, latex-free environment. Covering facial hair in semirestricted and restricted areas Key words: facial hair, beards, surgical masks. Covering ears in semirestricted and restricted areas Key words: ears, pierced earrings, surgical head coverings. Surgical wound classification QUESTION: ANSWER: We are having disagreements at our facility about how Perioperative RNs should assign surgical wound classifica- certain procedures should be classified when using the tion collaboratively with the surgeon after a careful assess- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) sur- ment of the specific factors associated with each surgical gical wound classification system. Can you discuss the procedure. According to the CDC, surgical wounds should wound classifications that should be assigned to some be classified based on the likelihood and degree of wound common procedures? contamination at the time of surgery.1 The following are 300 j AORN Journal www.aornjournal.org September 2015, Vol. 102, No. 3 Clinical Issues FPO = print & web 4C Figure 1. Surgical Wound Classification Decision Tree. the CDC’sdefinitions of the four surgical wound closed, and if necessary, drained with closed drainage [eg, bulb classifications: drain]. Operative incisional wounds that follow non- penetrating (blunt) trauma should be included in this category [Class I] Clean wounds: These are uninfected operative if they meet the criteria. wounds in which no inflammation is encountered and the respiratory, alimentary, genital, or uninfected urinary tracts [Class II] Clean-contaminated wounds: These are operative are not entered. In addition, clean wounds are primarily wounds in which the respiratory, alimentary, genital, or www.aornjournal.org AORN Journal j 301 Van WicklindBrubaker September 2015, Vol. 102, No. 3 Table 1. Wound Classifications for Specific Procedures Cesarean section with long labor or ruptured membranes A cesarean section should be classified as Class II (clean-contaminated) because the uterus is entered to deliver the child. Cesarean deliveries with or without ruptured membranes or long labors are Class II procedures unless there is a specific reason (eg, presence of meconium representing spillage from the fetal gastrointestinal [GI] tract) to assign a Class III (contaminated) rating. Class IV (dirty or infected) would be assigned if an existing clinical infection were present, evidenced by the presence of purulence. Circumcision A circumcision does not enter the genitourinary (GU) tract; therefore, the wound classification should be Class I (clean). Coronary artery bypass grafting Coronary artery bypass grafting does not enter the respiratory tract and should be classified as Class I (clean). Hepatectomy Within the liver is a network of fine tubular channels known as bile capillaries that collect and carry bile. These capillaries merge to form the bile ducts and eventually become the hepatic duct; therefore, a procedure where the liver is completely or partially removed transects the biliary tract, which is a part of the GI tract, and should be classified as Class II (clean-contaminated). Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with esophagogastroduodenoscopy In a laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, the upper curvature of the stomach is wrapped around the esophagus and sutured into place. If the patient has a hiatal hernia, this is also repaired. The GI tract is not entered. For this reason, a laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is a Class I (clean) procedure. There is no classification for the esophagogastroduodenoscopy because there is no surgical wound. Orchiectomy An orchiectomy procedure should be classified as Class II (clean-contaminated) because the spermatic cord is severed. Orchiopexy An orchiopexy procedure enters the inguinal canal but not the GU tract. It should be classified as Class I (clean). Pancreatectomy The pancreas is part of the GI tract; therefore, a procedure in which the pancreas is completely or partially removed should be classified as Class II (clean-contaminated). Parotidectomy The salivary glands (parotid, submandibular, sublingual) produce saliva and are part of the GI tract. For this reason, surgical procedures involving the salivary glands should be classified as Class II (clean-contaminated). Penile prosthesis A procedure in which a penile prosthesis is inserted enters the erection chambers but not the GU tract. For this reason, it should be classified as Class I (clean). Penrose drain A surgical wound that is closed with a Penrose drain should be classified as Class III (contaminated). According to the CDC, “clean wounds are primarily closed, and if necessary, drained with closed drainage.”1(p109) A Penrose drain is a form of open drainage; therefore, a procedure in which a Penrose drain is placed cannot be classified as Class I. Class II (clean-contaminated) procedures are those where the respiratory, GI, or GU tracts are entered; unless these tracts are entered, the procedure cannot be classified as Class II. The definition of a Class III (contaminated) procedure includes an “open, fresh wound.”1(p109) When a Penrose drain is placed and the surgical wound is closed, the portion of the incision where the drain is inserted remains partially open. This fresh, open wound increases the potential for postoperative infection, so Class III is the correct classification. If the drainage from the wound is purulent, it is Class IV (dirty or infected). Pilonidal cyst If no inflammation or infection is present, the excision of a pilonidal cyst should be classified as Class I (clean). If acute inflammation is present, it should be classified as Class III (contaminated); if existing clinical infection (ie, purulence) is present, it should be classified as Class IV (dirty or infected). Portacaval shunt In this procedure, the hepatic vein is connected to the inferior vena cava. The GI tract is not entered. For this reason, a portacaval shunt should be classified as Class I (clean). Thoracoscopy and thoracotomy When thoracoscopy and thoracotomy procedures are performed, the pleural space is entered but the respiratory tract is not entered. These procedures should be classified as Class I (clean). Vasectomy During a vasectomy, the vas deferens, a part of the GU tract, is severed. For this reason, a vasectomy should
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guidelines on Paediatric Urology S
    Guidelines on Paediatric Urology S. Tekgül (Chair), H.S. Dogan, E. Erdem (Guidelines Associate), P. Hoebeke, R. Ko˘cvara, J.M. Nijman (Vice-chair), C. Radmayr, M.S. Silay (Guidelines Associate), R. Stein, S. Undre (Guidelines Associate) European Society for Paediatric Urology © European Association of Urology 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 7 1.1 Aim 7 1.2 Publication history 7 2. METHODS 8 3. THE GUIDELINE 8 3A PHIMOSIS 8 3A.1 Epidemiology, aetiology and pathophysiology 8 3A.2 Classification systems 8 3A.3 Diagnostic evaluation 8 3A.4 Disease management 8 3A.5 Follow-up 9 3A.6 Conclusions and recommendations on phimosis 9 3B CRYPTORCHIDISM 9 3B.1 Epidemiology, aetiology and pathophysiology 9 3B.2 Classification systems 9 3B.3 Diagnostic evaluation 10 3B.4 Disease management 10 3B.4.1 Medical therapy 10 3B.4.2 Surgery 10 3B.5 Follow-up 11 3B.6 Recommendations for cryptorchidism 11 3C HYDROCELE 12 3C.1 Epidemiology, aetiology and pathophysiology 12 3C.2 Diagnostic evaluation 12 3C.3 Disease management 12 3C.4 Recommendations for the management of hydrocele 12 3D ACUTE SCROTUM IN CHILDREN 13 3D.1 Epidemiology, aetiology and pathophysiology 13 3D.2 Diagnostic evaluation 13 3D.3 Disease management 14 3D.3.1 Epididymitis 14 3D.3.2 Testicular torsion 14 3D.3.3 Surgical treatment 14 3D.4 Follow-up 14 3D.4.1 Fertility 14 3D.4.2 Subfertility 14 3D.4.3 Androgen levels 15 3D.4.4 Testicular cancer 15 3D.5 Recommendations for the treatment of acute scrotum in children 15 3E HYPOSPADIAS 15 3E.1 Epidemiology, aetiology and pathophysiology
    [Show full text]
  • Single Scrotal Incision Orchiopexy - a Systematic Review ______Hugo Fabiano Fernandes Novaes, José Abraão Carneiro Neto, Antonio Macedo Jr, Ubirajara Barroso Júnior
    REVIEW Article Vol. 39 (3): 305-311, May - June, 2013 doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2013.03.02 Single scrotal incision orchiopexy - a systematic review _______________________________________________ Hugo Fabiano Fernandes Novaes, José Abraão Carneiro Neto, Antonio Macedo Jr, Ubirajara Barroso Júnior Section of Pediatric Urology, Division of Urology Bahiana School of Medicine and Federal University of Bahia and Federal University of São Paulo ABSTRACT ARTICLE INFO _________________________________________________________ ___________________ Objective: To conduct a systematic review on single scrotal incision orchiopexy. Key words: Materials and Methods: A search was performed using Pubmed, through which 16 ar- Cryptorchidism; Orchiopexy; ticles were selected out of a total of 133. The following conditions were considered ex- Scrotum; Surgical Procedures, clusion criteria: other surgical methods such as an inguinal procedure or a laparoscopic Operative approach, retractile testes, or patients with previous testicular or inguinal surgery. Results: A total of 1558 orchiopexy surgeries initiated with a transcrotal incision were Int Braz J Urol. 2013; 39: 305-11 analyzed. Patients’ ages ranged between 5 months and 21 years. Thirteen studies used __________________ high scrotal incisions, and low scrotal incisions were performed in the remainder of the studies. In 55 cases (3.53%), there was a need for inguinal incision. Recurrence was ob- Submitted for publication: served in 9 cases, testicular atrophy in 3, testicular hypotrophy in 2, and surgical site in- December 18, 2012 fections in 13 cases. High efficacy rates were observed, varying between 88% and 100%. __________________ Conclusions: Single scrotal incision orchiopexy proved to be an effective technique and is associated with low rates of complications.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Microsurgery in Urological Practice
    Chen-1 The History of Microsurgery in Urological Practice Mang L. Chen1, Gregory M. Buncke2 and Paul J. Turek3 1G.U. Recon, San Francisco, CA, 94114 2The Buncke Clinic, San Francisco, CA 94114 3The Turek Clinic, Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Correspondence to: Mang Chen, MD G.U. Recon 45 Castro St, Suite 111 San Francisco, CA 94114 Tel: 415-481-3980 Email: [email protected] Chen-2 Abstract Operative microscopy spans all surgical disciplines, allowing human dexterity to perform beyond direct visual limitations. Microsurgery started in otolaryngology, became popular in reconstructive microsurgery, and was then adopted in urology. Starting with reproductive tract reconstruction of the vas and epididymis, microsurgery in urology now extends to varicocele repair, sperm retrieval, penile transplantation and free flap phalloplasty. By examining the peer reviewed and lay literature this review discusses the history of microsurgery and its subsequent development as a subspecialty in urology. Keywords: urology, microsurgery, phalloplasty, vasovasostomy, varicocelectomy Chen-3 I. Introduction Microsurgery has been instrumental to surgical advances in many medical fields. Otolaryngology, ophthalmology, gynecology, hand and plastic surgery have all embraced the operating microscope to minimize surgical trauma and scar and to increase patency rates of vessels, nerves and tubes. Urologic adoption of microsurgery began with vasectomy reversals, testis transplants, varicocelectomies and sperm retrieval and has now progressed to free flap phalloplasties and penile transplantation. In this review, we describe the origins of microsurgery, highlight the careers of prominent microsurgeons, and discuss current use applications in urology. II. Birth of Microsurgery 1) Technology The birth of microsurgery followed from an interesting marriage of technology and clinical need.
    [Show full text]
  • Answer Key Chapter 1
    Instructor's Guide AC210610: Basic CPT/HCPCS Exercises Page 1 of 101 Answer Key Chapter 1 Introduction to Clinical Coding 1.1: Self-Assessment Exercise 1. The patient is seen as an outpatient for a bilateral mammogram. CPT Code: 77055-50 Note that the description for code 77055 is for a unilateral (one side) mammogram. 77056 is the correct code for a bilateral mammogram. Use of modifier -50 for bilateral is not appropriate when CPT code descriptions differentiate between unilateral and bilateral. 2. Physician performs a closed manipulation of a medial malleolus fracture—left ankle. CPT Code: 27766-LT The code represents an open treatment of the fracture, but the physician performed a closed manipulation. Correct code: 27762-LT 3. Surgeon performs a cystourethroscopy with dilation of a urethral stricture. CPT Code: 52341 The documentation states that it was a urethral stricture, but the CPT code identifies treatment of ureteral stricture. Correct code: 52281 4. The operative report states that the physician performed Strabismus surgery, requiring resection of the medial rectus muscle. CPT Code: 67314 The CPT code selection is for resection of one vertical muscle, but the medial rectus muscle is horizontal. Correct code: 67311 5. The chiropractor documents that he performed osteopathic manipulation on the neck and back (lumbar/thoracic). CPT Code: 98925 Note in the paragraph before code 98925, the body regions are identified. The neck would be the cervical region; the thoracic and lumbar regions are identified separately. Therefore, three body regions are identified. Correct code: 98926 Instructor's Guide AC210610: Basic CPT/HCPCS Exercises Page 2 of 101 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Individualized Treatment Guidelines for Postpubertal Cryptorchidism
    pISSN: 2287-4208 / eISSN: 2287-4690 World J Mens Health 2015 December 33(3): 161-166 http://dx.doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.2015.33.3.161 Review Article Individualized Treatment Guidelines for Postpubertal Cryptorchidism Jae Min Chung1,2, Sang Don Lee1,2 1Department of Urology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, 2Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea Cryptorchidism is a well-known congenital anomaly in children. However, its diagnosis is often delayed for reasons including patient unawareness or denial of abnormal findings in the testis. Moreover, it has been difficult to establish an optimal treatment strategy for postpubertal cryptorchidism, given the small number of patients. Unlike cryptorchidism in children, postpubertal cryptorchidism is associated with an increased probability of neoplasms, which has led orchiectomy to be the recommended treatment. However, routine orchiectomy should be avoided in some cases due to quality-of-life issues and the potential risk of perioperative mortality. Based on a literature review, this study proposes individualized treatment guidelines for postpubertal cryptorchidism. Key Words: Adolescent; Adult; Cryptorchidism INTRODUCTION egies for cryptorchidism in children are well-established. A surgical approach, most often orchiopexy, is recom- Cryptorchidism is a pathological condition in which the mended for testes that remain undescended after six testis fails to descend to the base of the scrotum. It is one months of age [3]. However, it has been difficult to estab- of the most common congenital anomalies encountered in lish a standard treatment for postpubertal cryptorchidism, pediatric urology. Despite extensive study, knowledge re- given the small number of patients with this condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Icd-9-Cm (2010)
    ICD-9-CM (2010) PROCEDURE CODE LONG DESCRIPTION SHORT DESCRIPTION 0001 Therapeutic ultrasound of vessels of head and neck Ther ult head & neck ves 0002 Therapeutic ultrasound of heart Ther ultrasound of heart 0003 Therapeutic ultrasound of peripheral vascular vessels Ther ult peripheral ves 0009 Other therapeutic ultrasound Other therapeutic ultsnd 0010 Implantation of chemotherapeutic agent Implant chemothera agent 0011 Infusion of drotrecogin alfa (activated) Infus drotrecogin alfa 0012 Administration of inhaled nitric oxide Adm inhal nitric oxide 0013 Injection or infusion of nesiritide Inject/infus nesiritide 0014 Injection or infusion of oxazolidinone class of antibiotics Injection oxazolidinone 0015 High-dose infusion interleukin-2 [IL-2] High-dose infusion IL-2 0016 Pressurized treatment of venous bypass graft [conduit] with pharmaceutical substance Pressurized treat graft 0017 Infusion of vasopressor agent Infusion of vasopressor 0018 Infusion of immunosuppressive antibody therapy Infus immunosup antibody 0019 Disruption of blood brain barrier via infusion [BBBD] BBBD via infusion 0021 Intravascular imaging of extracranial cerebral vessels IVUS extracran cereb ves 0022 Intravascular imaging of intrathoracic vessels IVUS intrathoracic ves 0023 Intravascular imaging of peripheral vessels IVUS peripheral vessels 0024 Intravascular imaging of coronary vessels IVUS coronary vessels 0025 Intravascular imaging of renal vessels IVUS renal vessels 0028 Intravascular imaging, other specified vessel(s) Intravascul imaging NEC 0029 Intravascular
    [Show full text]
  • Outpatient Surgical Procedures – Site of Service: CPT/HCPCS Codes
    UnitedHealthcare® Commercial Policy Appendix: Applicable Code List Outpatient Surgical Procedures – Site of Service: CPT/HCPCS Codes This list of codes applies to the Utilization Review Guideline titled Effective Date: August 1, 2021 Outpatient Surgical Procedures – Site of Service. Applicable Codes The following list(s) of procedure and/or diagnosis codes is provided for reference purposes only and may not be all inclusive. The listing of a code does not imply that the service described by the code is a covered or non-covered health service. Benefit coverage for health services is determined by the member specific benefit plan document and applicable laws that may require coverage for a specific service. The inclusion of a code does not imply any right to reimbursement or guarantee claim payment. Other Policies and Guidelines may apply. This list contains CPT/HCPCS codes for the following: • Auditory System • Female Genital System • Musculoskeletal System • Cardiovascular System • Hemic and Lymphatic Systems • Nervous System • Digestive System • Integumentary System • Respiratory System • Eye/Ocular Adnexa System • Male Genital System • Urinary System CPT Code Description Auditory System 69100 Biopsy external ear 69110 Excision external ear; partial, simple repair 69140 Excision exostosis(es), external auditory canal 69145 Excision soft tissue lesion, external auditory canal 69205 Removal foreign body from external auditory canal; with general anesthesia 69222 Debridement, mastoidectomy cavity, complex (e.g., with anesthesia or more
    [Show full text]
  • Surgical Treatment of Cryptorhidism in Childhood
    Trakia Journal of Sciences, No 4, pp 379-385, 2016 Copyright©2016 Trakia University Available online at: http://www.uni-sz.bg ISSN 1313-7050 (print) ISSN 1313-3551 (online) doi:10.15547/tjs.2016.04.013 Review SURGICAL TREATMENT OF CRYPTORHIDISM IN CHILDHOOD D. Dinkov, Kr. Kalinova*, K. Georgiev, B. Brahomov, E. Kyazimova, Y. Dimcheva Department of Pediatric Surgery, Medical Faculty, Trakia University, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria ABSTRACT Undescended testis (UDT) or cryptorchidism is the most common genital anomaly seen in boys and can be treated surgically by orchidopexy. Cryptorchidism is best diagnosed clinically, and treated by surgical orchiopexy at age 6-12 months, without a routine biopsy. Timing of orchidopexy must be optimized in order to improve long-term prognosis. Both primary care providers and parents should be educated regarding the advantages of early orchidopexy in UDT. Outcomes of orchiopexy include having a viable, palpable testis in the scrotum, fertility, as measured by paternity rates or semen analysis in adulthood and risk of testicular cancer. Multiple operative techniques have been described and are associated with various success rates. In the past decade, success of orchiopexy for inguinal testes has been >95%. For abdominal testes, success for orchiopexy has been >85-90% in most series with single stage orchiopexy or two stage Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy, both with open surgical or laparoscopic technique. Laparoscopy is the best way of diagnosing and managing intra-abdominal testes. However, having a palpable testis in the scrotum does not assure fertility, as there are iatrogenic factors that may adversely affect the outcome. The risk of testicular carcinoma is increased by a factor of 3.7 to 7.5 times.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Services and Availability (By Location)
    UPMC | University of Pittsburgh Medical Center For Reference Only UROLOGY 2013 Summary of Services and Availability (by location) Each location has sufficient space, equipment, staffing and financial resources in place or available in sufficient time as required to support each requested privilege. On an ongoing basis, the organization consistently determines the resources necessary for each requested privilege related to the facility's scope of service. Please review the following Summary of Services and Availability by Location prior to making your selections. If a facility is specifically identified below as NOT having a privilege/service available, you will NOT be considered for that privilege at that individual facility. Any request made that is identified as not available at an individual site will be considered Not Applicable for that site(s), and will be identified as such on your final approved Delineation of Privileges form. “x” means Privilege is Available at that location. “C” means contractual arrangement restricts granting this privilege. “N/A” means Privilege Not Available at that location. Facility Codes: UHOC= UPMC St. Margaret Harmar Outpatient Center Privilege UHOC Core privileges X Consultation Privileges N/A SURGERY OF THE KIDNEY, ADRENAL, URETER, AND BLADDER Biopsy, all techniques X Nephrotomy/pyelotomy/ureterotomy/ cystotomy for X stent placement, stone extraction, drainage abscess, biopsy, fulgeration, insertion of radioactive material Percutaneous nephroscopy, and other percutaneous X catheter techniques Nephrectomy,
    [Show full text]
  • The Urology Program at Maine Medical Center
    The Urology Program at Maine Medical Center A MaineHealth Member Maine Medical Center’s Urologic Conditions Treated Urology Program Specific conditions treated include: • Cancer of the adrenal gland, bladder, kidney, prostate, penis, and testicles The comprehensive urology program at Maine Medical Center (MMC) ensures access to high quality and leading-edge urologic treatment today, • Enlarged prostate, or benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) while planning to meet our communities’ future needs. Our urologists • Erectile dysfunction evaluate and manage a full range of adult and pediatric urologic diseases and • Hematuria, or blood in the urine disorders. Patients are provided with exceptional care close to home at both Maine Medical Center and its Maine Medical Partners – Urology office. • Hydrocele/Spermatocele • Kidney stone disease • Male infertility What is Urology? • Neurogenic bladder Urology is a medical and surgical specialty involving the diagnosis and • Overactive bladder treatment of diseases and disorders of the male and female urinary tract • Pediatric urologic problems, including: and the male reproductive organs in both adults and children. – Vesico-ureteral reflux – UPJ obstruction – Penile/urethral anomalies – Voiding dysfunction – Undescended testicle • Pelvic floor disorders • Peyronie’s disease • Urethral stricture • Urinary incontinence, male and female • Urinary tract infections • Varicocele • Vasectomy • Vesicoureteral reflux or a backflow of urine into the ureter • Voiding dysfunction or abnormal bladder emptying Please see our website for additional conditions treated. 1 12 Urologists with Outstanding Milestones and Accolades Experience and Expertise An Impressive Roster of Firsts Maine Medical Center has the largest and most experienced urologic The urologic specialists at MMC have achieved many clinical firsts team in northern New England.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Compilation of Inpatient Only Procedure Lists by Specialty
    2019 Compilation of Inpatient Only Procedure Lists by Specialty (for CPT searching) 2019 Bariatric Surgery: Is the Surgery Medicare Inpatient Only or not? Disclaimer: This is not the CMS Inpatient Only Procedure List (Annual OPPS Addendum E). No guarantee can be made of the accuracy of this information which was compiled from public sources. CPT Codes are property of the AMA and are made available to the public only for non-commercial usage. Gastric Bypass or Partial Gastrectomy Procedures Inpatient Only Procedure Not an Inpatient Only Procedure 43644 Laparoscopy, surgical, gastric restrictive 43659 Unlisted laparoscopy procedure, stomach procedure; with gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y gastroenterostomy (roux limb 150 cm or less) 43645 Laparoscopy, surgical, gastric restrictive procedure; with gastric bypass and small intestine reconstruction to limit absorption 43775 Laparoscopy, surgical, gastric restrictive procedure; longitudinal gastrectomy (ie, sleeve gastrectomy) 43843 Gastric restrictive procedure, without gastric bypass, for morbid obesity; other than vertical- banded gastroplasty 43845 Gastric restrictive procedure with partial gastrectomy, pylorus-preserving duodenoileostomy and ileoileostomy (50 to 100 cm common channel) to limit absorption (biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch) 43846 Gastric restrictive procedure, with gastric bypass for morbid obesity; with short limb (150 cm or less) Roux-en-Y gastroenterostomy 43847 Gastric restrictive procedure, with gastric bypass for morbid obesity; with small intestine reconstruction
    [Show full text]
  • EAU Guidelines on Paediatric Urology 2017
    EAU Guidelines on Paediatric Urology S. Tekgül (Chair), H.S. Dogan, R. Kocvara, J.M. Nijman (Vice-chair), C. Radmayr, R. Stein Guidelines Associates: M.S. Silay, S. Undre, J. Quaedackers European Society for Paediatric Urology © European Association of Urology 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 8 1.1 Aim 8 1.2 Panel composition 8 1.3 Available publications 8 1.4 Publication history 8 1.5 Summary of changes 8 1.5.1 New and changed recommendations 9 2. METHODS 10 2.1 Peer review 10 2.2 Future goals 10 3. THE GUIDELINE 10 3.1 Phimosis 10 3.1.1 Epidemiology, aetiology and pathophysiology 10 3.1.2 Classification systems 10 3.1.3 Diagnostic evaluation 10 3.1.4 Management 10 3.1.5 Follow-up 11 3.1.6 Summary of evidence and recommendations for the management of phimosis 11 3.2 Management of undescended testes 11 3.2.1 Background 11 3.2.2 Classification 12 3.2.2.1 Palpable testes 12 3.2.2.2 Non-palpable testes 13 3.2.3 Diagnostic evaluation 13 3.2.3.1 History 13 3.2.3.2 Physical examination 13 3.2.3.3 Imaging studies 13 3.2.4 Management 13 3.2.4.1 Medical therapy 13 3.2.4.1.1 Medical therapy for testicular descent 14 3.2.4.1.2 Medical therapy for fertility potential 14 3.2.4.2 Surgical therapy 14 3.2.4.2.1 Palpable testes 14 3.2.4.2.1.1 Inguinal orchidopexy 14 3.2.4.2.1.2 Scrotal orchidopexy 15 3.2.4.2.2 Non-palpable testes 15 3.2.4.2.3 Complications of surgical therapy 16 3.2.4.2.4 Surgical therapy for undescended testes after puberty 16 3.2.5 Undescended testes and fertility 16 3.2.6 Undescended testes and malignancy 17 3.2.7 Summary
    [Show full text]