Definitions of Medicare Code Edits

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Definitions of Medicare Code Edits Medicare Code Editor Definitions of Medicare Code Edits v31.0 October 2013 PBL-011 October 2013 Table of Contents About this document .......................................................................................... v Chapter 1: Edit code lists .............................................................................. 7 1. Invalid diagnosis or procedure code ...................................................................................... 7 2. E-code as principal diagnosis ................................................................................................ 7 3. Duplicate of PDX ................................................................................................................... 8 4. Age conflict ............................................................................................................................ 8 Newborn diagnoses ............................................................................................................ 8 Pediatric diagnoses (age 0 through 17) ............................................................................ 13 Maternity diagnoses (age 12 through 55) ......................................................................... 14 Adult diagnoses (age 15 through 124) .............................................................................. 34 5. Sex conflict .......................................................................................................................... 36 Diagnoses for females only ............................................................................................... 36 Procedures for females only ............................................................................................. 63 Diagnoses for males only .................................................................................................. 68 Procedures for males only ................................................................................................ 71 6. Manifestation code as principal diagnosis ........................................................................... 73 Manifestations not allowed as principal diagnosis ............................................................ 73 7. Non-specific principal diagnosis .......................................................................................... 78 8. Questionable admission ...................................................................................................... 78 Questionable admission - principal diagnosis only ........................................................... 78 9. Unacceptable principal diagnosis ........................................................................................ 78 Unacceptable principal diagnoses .................................................................................... 79 10. Non-specific O.R. procedure ............................................................................................. 95 11. Non-covered procedure ..................................................................................................... 95 Non-covered procedures ................................................................................................... 95 Open biopsy check .................................................................................................................. 98 13. Bilateral procedure............................................................................................................. 98 Bilateral procedure codes ................................................................................................. 98 14. Invalid age ......................................................................................................................... 99 15. Invalid sex .......................................................................................................................... 99 16. Invalid discharge status ..................................................................................................... 99 17. Limited coverage ............................................................................................................. 100 Limited coverage ............................................................................................................. 101 18. Wrong procedure performed ........................................................................................... 101 Wrong procedure performed ........................................................................................... 101 19. Procedure inconsistent with length of stay ..................................................................... 102 Procedure inconsistent with length of stay ...................................................................... 102 Chapter 2: Code list changes .................................................................... 103 Changes to existing edits ...................................................................................................... 103 Medicare Code Editor Definitions of Medicare Code Edits Page iii Table of Contents Index .................................................................................................. 105 Medicare Code Editor Definitions of Medicare Code Edits Page iv About this document The Medicare Code Editor (MCE) detects and reports errors in the coding claims data. This manual contains a description of each coding edit with corresponding ICD-9-CM code lists. The coding edit information in this manual is effective from 10/01/2013 to 09/30/2014. Medicare Code Editor Definitions of Medicare Code Edits Page v Chapter 1: Edit code lists Following is a list of current edits described in this chapter. 1. Invalid diagnosis or procedure code 2. E-code as principal diagnosis 3. Duplicate of PDX 4. Age conflict 5. Sex conflict 6. Manifestation code as principal diagnosis 7. Non-specific principal diagnosis (Discontinued as of 10/01/07) 8. Questionable admission 9. Unacceptable principal diagnosis 10. Non-specific O.R. procedure (Discontinued as of 10/01/07) 11. Non-covered procedure 12. Open biopsy check (Discontinued as of 10/01/10) 13. Bilateral procedure 14. Invalid age 15. Invalid sex 16. Invalid discharge status 17. Limited coverage 18. Wrong procedure performed 19. Procedure inconsistent with length of stay 1. Invalid diagnosis or procedure code The Medicare Code Editor checks each diagnosis including the admitting diagnosis and each procedure against a table of valid ICD-9-CM codes. If an entered code does not agree with any code on the internal list, it is assumed to be invalid or that the 4th or 5th digit of the code is invalid or missing. 2. E-code as principal diagnosis For a list of all valid ICD-9-CM codes, see volumes 2 (diseases) and 3 (procedures) of the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Fourth Edition, Clinical Modification (ICD-9- CM). E-codes are ICD-9-CM codes beginning with the letter E. They describe the circumstance causing an injury, not the nature of the injury, and therefore should not be used as a principal diagnosis. For a list of all E-codes, see volume 2 (diseases) of the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Fourth Edition, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM). Medicare Code Editor Definitions of Medicare Code Edits Page 7 Edit code lists 3. Duplicate of PDX Whenever a secondary diagnosis is coded the same as the principal diagnosis, the secondary diagnosis is identified as a duplicate of the principal diagnosis. 4. Age conflict The Medicare Code Editor detects inconsistencies between a patient’s age and any diagnosis on the patient’s record. For example, a five-year-old patient with benign prostatic hypertrophy or a 78-year-old patient coded with a delivery. In the above cases, the diagnosis is clinically and virtually impossible in a patient of the stated age. Therefore, either the diagnosis or the age is presumed to be incorrect. There are four age categories for diagnoses in the program: • Newborn. Age of 0 years; a subset of diagnoses intended only for newborns and neonates (e.g., fetal distress, perinatal jaundice). • Pediatric. Age range is 0–17 years inclusive (e.g., Reye’s syndrome, routine child health exam). • Maternity. Age range is 12–55 years inclusive (e.g., diabetes in pregnancy, antepartum pulmonary complication). • Adult. Age range is 15–124 years inclusive (e.g., senile delirium, mature cataract). The following pages contain lists of ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes with corresponding English descriptions for each of the age categories described above.
Recommended publications
  • Hysteroscopy and Endometrial Ablation Using Novasure
    Hysteroscopy and Endometrial Ablation Using Novasure What is a hysteroscopy and endometrial ablation using Novasure? This is a procedure where a doctor uses a thin tube with a tiny camera to look inside the uterus. There are no incisions. Saline solution is used to expand the uterus in order to look at the inside of the uterus. The Novasure device is then used to burn the lining of the uterus. When is this surgery used? To evaluate and or treat diseases of the uterus • Painful periods. • Heavy or irregular vaginal bleeding. How do I prepare for surgery? • Before surgery, a pre-op appointment will be scheduled with your doctor at their office or with a nurse practitioner or physician assistant at Domino Farms. • Depending on your health, we may ask you to see your primary doctor, a specialist, and/or an anesthesiologist to make sure you are healthy for surgery. • The lab work for your surgery must be done at least 3 days before surgery. • Some medications need to be stopped before the surgery. A list of medications will be provided at your pre-operative appointment. • Smoking can affect your surgery and recovery. Smokers may have difficulty breathing during the surgery and tend to heal more slowly after surgery. If you are a smoker, it is best to quit 6-8 weeks before surgery. If you are unable to stop smoking before surgery, your doctor can order a nicotine patch while you are in the hospital. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (734) 763-6295 - 1 - • You will be told at your pre-op visit whether you will need a bowel prep for your surgery and if you do, what type you will use.
    [Show full text]
  • Multisectoral Academic Training Guide on Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting
    Multisectoral Academic Training Guide on Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Directoras Adriana Kaplan y Laura Nuño Gómez Coordinadoras Magaly Thill y Nora Salas Seoane Multisectoral Academic Training Guide on Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Multisectoral Academic Training Guide on Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Directoras Adriana Kaplan y Laura Nuño Gómez Coordinadoras Magaly Thill y Nora Salas Seoane Neus Aliaga Sonia Núñez Puente Rut Bermejo Casado Laura Nuño Gómez Clara Carvalho Els Leye Giovanna Cavatorta Carla Moleiro Gily Coene Maya Pellicciari Ricardo Falcão Francesco Pompeo Lidia Fernández Montes Julia Ropero Carrasco Diana Fernández Romero Nora Salas Seoane Sabrina Flamini Cristina Santinho Michela Fusaschi Magaly Thill Cecilia Gallotti Valentina Vitale Adriana Kaplan Edición y revisión de la versión original en inglés Lucy Deegan Leirião This publication has been produced with the financial support of the Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme 2014-2020 of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of its authors and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Commission. It is part of the Multisectoral Academic Programme to prevent and combat Female Genital Mutilation (FGM/C). © Los autores Editorial DYKINSON, S.L. Meléndez Valdés, 61 – 28015 Madrid Teléfono (+34) 91544 28 46 – (+34) 91544 28 69 e-mail: [email protected] http://www.dykinson.es http://www.dykinson.com ISBN: Preimpresión: Besing Servicios Gráfi cos, S.L. [email protected] Table of contents List of abbreviations ..................................................................................... 15 Institutions and authors ............................................................................... 17 Chapter I. Introduction to the Multisectoral Academic Training Guide on FGM/C .............................................................................. 25 Laura Nuño Gómez and Adriana Kaplan 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Female Genital Cosmetic Surgery Exceptional
    FEMALE GENITAL COSMETIC SURGERY EXCEPTIONAL FUNDING REQUIRED BaNES, Swindon and Wiltshire CCG (BSW) does not normally fund elective vaginal labial surgery, vaginoplasty or hymenorrhaphy. Clinicians must ensure there is a clear clinical rationale for any potential intervention, as all procedures that involve partial or total removal of the external female genitalia for non-clinical reasons are defined as Female Genital Mutilation and as such are against the law. (The Female Genital Mutilation Act of 2003) Clinicians must be alert to the possibility that some patients who seek revision surgery may do so as a result of previous interventions which are classed as unlawful under the Act. Background Labiaplasty A labiaplasty is a surgical procedure to reduce the size of the labia minora. Labiaplasty is generally a cosmetic procedure to change appearance alone and common consequence of childbirth is not sufficient reason to apply for funding. Labiaplasty is not normally supported or funded by the CCG. Vaginoplasty Non-reconstructive vaginoplasty or "vaginal rejuvenation" is used to restore vaginal tone and appearance. As this is generally considered a cosmetic procedure, vaginoplasty is not normally supported or funded by the CCG. Hymenorrhaphy Hymenorrhaphy, or hymen reconstruction surgery, is a cosmetic procedure and is not normally supported or funded by the CCG. This policy does not relate to reversal of female genital mutilation. This policy is informed by the NHS England (2013) Interim Clinical Commissioning Policy Labiaplasty, Vaginoplasty & Hymenorrhaphy. (Armed Forces Commissioning Policy Task and Finish Group) Reference: Policy Name Review Date Version BSW-CP046 Female Genital Cosmetic Surgery March 2023 4.1 .
    [Show full text]
  • AAGL Practice Report: Practice Guidelines for Management of Intrauterine Synechiae
    Special Article AAGL Practice Report: Practice Guidelines for Management of Intrauterine Synechiae AAGL ADVANCING MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY WORLDWIDE Background The search was not restricted to English language literature; committee members fluent in languages other than English re- Intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) have been recognized as viewed relevant articles and provided the committee with rel- a cause of secondary amenorrhea since the end of the 19th ative information translated into English. Because of the century [1], and in the mid-20th century, Asherman further paucity of data in this area, all published works were included described the eponymous condition occurring after preg- for the electronic database searches, and relevant articles not nancy [2]. The terms ‘‘Asherman syndrome’’ and IUAs are available in electronic sources (e.g., published before the be- often used interchangeably, although the syndrome requires ginning of electronic database commencement) were cross- the constellation of signs and symptoms (in this case, pain, referenced from hand-searched bibliographies and included menstrual disturbance, and subfertility in any combination) in the literature review. When necessary, authors were con- and the presence of IUAs [2]. The presence of IUAs in the tacted directly for clarification of points published. absence of symptoms may be best referred to as asymptom- atic IUAs or synechiae. Diagnosis Identification and Assessment of Evidence In women with suspected IUAs, physical examination usually fails to reveal abnormalities [3,4]. Blind transcervical This AAGL Practice Guideline was produced after elec- sounding of the uterus may reveal cervical obstruction at or tronic resources including Medline, PubMed, CINAHL, the near the level of the internal os [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Improved Preservation of Human Corneal Basement Membrane
    BritishJournal ofOphthalmology 1994; 78: 863-870 863 Improved preservation ofhuman corneal basement membrane following freezing of donor tissue for Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjo.78.11.863 on 1 November 1994. Downloaded from epikeratophakia Robert D Young, W John Armitage, Paul Bowerman, Stuart D Cook, David L Easty Abstract States, good results continue to be achieved by Current methods for the production of the small number ofBritish surgeons performing lenticules for epikeratophakia involve rapid the technique.4 However, no comprehensive freezing, cryolathing, and slow warming of the account of its long term outcome has yet been donor cornea. We have found that this pro- published. cedure causes structural damage to the Several complications resulting in the failure epithelial basement membrane in the donor of epikeratophakia have been reported, includ- cornea which may subsequently contribute to ing infection, graft dehiscence, persistent inter- poor postoperative re-epithelialisation of the face haze or opacity, ulceration, and imperfect implant, leading to graft failure. Endeavouring re-epithelialisation. Among these, the failure of to overcome these problems, the effects of host epithelial cells to migrate over and re- cryoprotection of donor cornea were investi- surface the anterior face of the grafted tissue gated, using dimethyl sulphoxide, in conjunc- continues to be the major reason for the removal tion with different cooling and warming rates ofepikeratophakia lenticules.'-'0 as part of the protocol for cryolathing. The Epithelial healing is itselfa complex phenome- structural integrity of the epithelial basement non involving mitosis of host cells at the graft membrane zone (BMZ) was then assessed by periphery, centripetal migration, and attach- electron microscopy and by immunofluores- ment.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines on Paediatric Urology S
    Guidelines on Paediatric Urology S. Tekgül (Chair), H.S. Dogan, E. Erdem (Guidelines Associate), P. Hoebeke, R. Ko˘cvara, J.M. Nijman (Vice-chair), C. Radmayr, M.S. Silay (Guidelines Associate), R. Stein, S. Undre (Guidelines Associate) European Society for Paediatric Urology © European Association of Urology 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 7 1.1 Aim 7 1.2 Publication history 7 2. METHODS 8 3. THE GUIDELINE 8 3A PHIMOSIS 8 3A.1 Epidemiology, aetiology and pathophysiology 8 3A.2 Classification systems 8 3A.3 Diagnostic evaluation 8 3A.4 Disease management 8 3A.5 Follow-up 9 3A.6 Conclusions and recommendations on phimosis 9 3B CRYPTORCHIDISM 9 3B.1 Epidemiology, aetiology and pathophysiology 9 3B.2 Classification systems 9 3B.3 Diagnostic evaluation 10 3B.4 Disease management 10 3B.4.1 Medical therapy 10 3B.4.2 Surgery 10 3B.5 Follow-up 11 3B.6 Recommendations for cryptorchidism 11 3C HYDROCELE 12 3C.1 Epidemiology, aetiology and pathophysiology 12 3C.2 Diagnostic evaluation 12 3C.3 Disease management 12 3C.4 Recommendations for the management of hydrocele 12 3D ACUTE SCROTUM IN CHILDREN 13 3D.1 Epidemiology, aetiology and pathophysiology 13 3D.2 Diagnostic evaluation 13 3D.3 Disease management 14 3D.3.1 Epididymitis 14 3D.3.2 Testicular torsion 14 3D.3.3 Surgical treatment 14 3D.4 Follow-up 14 3D.4.1 Fertility 14 3D.4.2 Subfertility 14 3D.4.3 Androgen levels 15 3D.4.4 Testicular cancer 15 3D.5 Recommendations for the treatment of acute scrotum in children 15 3E HYPOSPADIAS 15 3E.1 Epidemiology, aetiology and pathophysiology
    [Show full text]
  • Endometrial Ablation
    PATIENT INFORMATION A publication of Jackson-Madison County General Hospital Surgical Services Endometrial Ablation As an alternative to hysterectomy, your doctor may recommend a procedure called an endometrial ablation. The endometrium is the lining of the uterus. The word ablation means destroy. This surgery eliminates the endometrial lining of the uterus. It is often used in cases of very heavy menstrual bleeding. Because this surgery causes a decrease in the chances of becoming pregnant, it is not recommended for women who still want to have children. The advantage of this procedure is that your recovery time is usually faster than with hysterectomy. Your doctor will use general anesthesia or spinal anesthesia to perform the procedure. He will talk with you about the type of anesthesia that will be used in your case. This surgery can be done in an outpatient setting. During the procedure, a narrow, lighted viewing tube (the size of a pencil) called a hysteroscope is inserted through the vagina and cervix into the uterus. A tiny camera that is attached shows the uterus on a monitor. There are several ways the endometrial lining can be ablated (destroyed). Those methods include laser, radio waves, electrical current, freezing, hot water (balloon), or heated loop. The instruments are inserted through the tube to perform the ablation. Your doctor may also do a laparoscopy at the same time to be sure there are not other conditions that might require treatment or further surgery. In a laparoscopy, a small, lighted scope is used to look at the other organs in the pelvis.
    [Show full text]
  • Culdocentesis in Diagnosis of Disturbed Ectopic Pregnancy Still a Useful Procedure in Developing Countries
    CULDOCENTESIS IN DIAGNOSIS OF DISTURBED ECTOPIC PREGNANCY STILL A USEFUL PROCEDURE IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES Pages with reference to book, From 5 To 6 Tasneem Aslam Tariq ( Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi. ) Razia Korejo ( Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi. ) ABSTRACT Over a period of 5 years culdocentesis was carried out in 156 cases of suspected ectopic pregnancy using needle aspiration through the pouch of Douglas. The result was positive in 134 cases, with 131 being true positive and 3 false positive. In 22 cases the result was negative, 6 of which were false negative. It is concluded that culdocentesis is an effective method of diagnosing disturbed ectopic pregnancy (JPMA 42: 5, 1992). INTRODUCTION Ectopic pregnancy, a clinical diagnosis in majority of cases is infrequently seen in our hospital. Since it can present with varied symptoms, diagnosis can be difficult in some cases. To increase the accuracy rate of preoperative diagnosis in suspected cases of ectopic pregnancy, various diagnostic procedures have been employed over the years. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of culdocentesis for the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. PATIENTS AND METHOD The present study included 156 suspected cases of ectopic pregnancy admitted to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology between January, 1985 to December 1989. Culdocentesis was done in the operating theatre under aseptic precautions with or without general anaesthesia depending on the certainty of the diagnosis. Urinary bladder was catheterized and gentle bimanual vaginal examination was done to confirm the previous vaginal findings. Sims speculum was introduced in the vagina and posterior lip of cervix was held gently with a Vulsellum forceps, pulled upwards and forwards exposing the posterior fornix.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Health Course Guide
    Course Guide for Women’s Health 1 Approach to the Patient The OB/GYN History Rationale: A gynecological evaluation is an important part of primary health care and preventive medicine for women. A gynecological assessment should be a part of every woman’s general medical history and physical examination. Certain questions must be asked of every woman, whereas other questions are specific to particular problems. To accomplish these objectives, optimal communication must be achieved between patient and physician. The student will demonstrate the ability to: A. Perform a thorough obstetric-gynecologic history as a portion of a general medical history, including: 1. Chief complaint 2. Present illness 3. Menstrual history 4. Obstetric history 5. Gynecologic history 6. Contraceptive history 7. Sexual history 8. Family history 9. Social history B. Interact with the patient to gain her confidence and to develop an appreciation of the effect of her age, racial and cultural background, and economic status on her health; C. Communicate the results of the obstetric-gynecologic and general medical history by well-organized written and oral reports. The OB/GYN Examination Rationale: An accurate examination complements the history, provides additional information and helps determine diagnosis and guide management. It also provides an opportunity to educate and reassure the patient. The student will demonstrate the ability to: A. Interact with the patient to gain her confidence and cooperation, and assure her comfort and modesty B. Perform a painless obstetric-gynecologic examination as part of a woman’s general medical examination, including: 1. Breast examination 2. Abdominal examination 3. Complete pelvic examination 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Photorefractive Keratectomy for Correction of Epikeratophakia
    CASE REPORTS AND SMALL CASE SERIES high myopia resulting from poste- results might be related to the pre- Photorefractive Keratectomy rior lenticonus. Postsurgical refrac- existing corneal stromal abnormali- for Correction of tion was stable for 8 years, then a ties in their patients, which were not Epikeratophakia Regression rapid myopic regression of the epi- observed in our group. Thus, PRK keratophakic lenses was observed can effectively be used to treat epi- Excimer laser photorefractive kera- the following year (Table). In- keratophakic regressed lenses in a se- tectomy (PRK) is widely used for the stead of removing the failed epikera- lected group of patients in whom correction of myopia, astigmatism, tophakic lenses, we performed PRK both the epikeratograft and the sur- and hyperopia.1,2 It has also been on the eyes. rounding cornea are clear. This used for correction of astigmatism method eliminates the need for re- after penetrating keratoplasty.3 Results. Two and a half years after moval of the epikeratograft and ex- Epikeratophakia has been used PRK, the refraction in all 4 eyes is posing the patient to the risks of suc- in the treatment of nontolerant con- stable and the epigrafts are clear. The cessive penetrating keratoplasty. tact lens keratoconous patients.4,5 Table presents the refraction and vi- The epigrafts were made from ma- sual acuity results for the eyes be- Hirsh Ami, MD chined corneal tissue that was found fore PRK and at 3 months, 1 year, Solberg Yoram, MD, PhD unsuitable for penetrating kerato- and 21⁄2 years after PRK. No haze has Cahana Michael, MD plasty.
    [Show full text]
  • Fearful Symmetries: Essays and Testimonies Around Excision and Circumcision. Rodopi
    Fearful Symmetries Matatu Journal for African Culture and Society ————————————]^——————————— EDITORIAL BOARD Gordon Collier Christine Matzke Frank Schulze–Engler Geoffrey V. Davis Aderemi Raji–Oyelade Chantal Zabus †Ezenwa–Ohaeto TECHNICAL AND CARIBBEAN EDITOR Gordon Collier ———————————— ]^ ——————————— BOARD OF ADVISORS Anne V. Adams (Ithaca NY) Jürgen Martini (Magdeburg, Germany) Eckhard Breitinger (Bayreuth, Germany) Henning Melber (Windhoek, Namibia) Margaret J. Daymond (Durban, South Africa) Amadou Booker Sadji (Dakar, Senegal) Anne Fuchs (Nice, France) Reinhard Sander (San Juan, Puerto Rico) James Gibbs (Bristol, England) John A. Stotesbury (Joensuu, Finland) Johan U. Jacobs (Durban, South Africa) Peter O. Stummer (Munich, Germany) Jürgen Jansen (Aachen, Germany) Ahmed Yerma (Lagos, Nigeria)i — Founding Editor: Holger G. Ehling — ]^ Matatu is a journal on African and African diaspora literatures and societies dedicated to interdisciplinary dialogue between literary and cultural studies, historiography, the social sciences and cultural anthropology. ]^ Matatu is animated by a lively interest in African culture and literature (including the Afro- Caribbean) that moves beyond worn-out clichés of ‘cultural authenticity’ and ‘national liberation’ towards critical exploration of African modernities. The East African public transport vehicle from which Matatu takes its name is both a component and a symbol of these modernities: based on ‘Western’ (these days usually Japanese) technology, it is a vigorously African institution; it is usually
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Curettage and Hysteroscopy Plus Curettage After Uterine Arterial Embolization in the Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy
    Comparison of Curettage and Hysteroscopy Plus Curettage After Uterine Arterial Embolization in the Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Lili Cao Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Zhida Qian Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Lili Huang ( [email protected] ) Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5919-3172 Research article Keywords: Cesarean scar pregnancy, Hysteroscopy, Curettage, Uterine artery embolization Posted Date: July 2nd, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-39244/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/11 Abstract Background: Caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) stands for the advanced stage severe complication secondary to cesarean section, and its incidence shows an increasing trend recently. However, no consensus has been reached about the optimal CSP treatment. Methods: The childbearing CSP patients with a cesarean section history were evaluated by ultrasonography, with a gestational age of less than 10 weeks. 34 patients receiving dilation and curettage (D&C) and uterine artery embolization (UAE) were enrolled into the D&C group, while 46 undergoing hysteroscopy (H/S) and D&C after UAE were enrolled into the H/S+D&C group. Results: Differences in success rate and decrease in the β-hCG level in serum on the second day of surgery were not signicant between D&C and H/S+D&C groups (P>0.05). Also, differences in side effect rate, intraoperative blood loss amount, postoperative bleeding time, and total length of stay were not signicant between both groups (P>0.05).
    [Show full text]