DOCSLIB.ORG

THE AUDIENCE RESPONSE from the History of the Interpretation Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE AUDIENCE RESPONSE from the History of the Interpretation Of CHAPTER THREE THE AUDIENCE RESPONSE From the history of the interpretation of the Bacchae, outlined in Chapter 2, it is plain that widely differing opinions are held about the role of Pentheus. On the other hand it has earlier been suggested (p. 14) that an approach to the Bacchae which concentrates on the role of Pentheus of­ fers clear advantages-at least initially-over one which puts Dionysus as the central point, because Dionysus is a god, with all the resulting complications (What does Dionysus the god signify to Euripides and to his public? What significance has his appearance on the tragic stage?); and because the god appears in the action in such a way that the other characters only see in him a stranger from Lydia. But the public know that the stranger is the god Dionysus, and measure events by the yard­ stick of this predominant fact. The Bacchae is, therefore, even more than Oedipus Rex, a play in which a single sustained motif of tragic irony per­ vades practically the whole action, and this applies to all characters in the play with the exception of the god himself. This is the fundamental device used by the poet in the plot of the Bacchae. Diller in his observations (cf. n. 34) made two interesting contributions to the study of the Bacchae; one, on the place of the Bacchae in Euripides' later work, will be dealt with in Chapter 5, 55 the other reviews the psy­ chological approach to the role of Pentheus. Diller objected to Winnington-lngram's theory that Pentheus' opposition to the god was caused by his own Dionysiac qualities: sexual passions and lust for power. Schwinge (op. cit. 380 and his n. 77) supports Diller in this objec­ tion. Indeed Winnington-Ingram's ideas can lead to the assumption that the motives for the action of dramatic characters are inherent in their psychological make-up and not in the complications of the plot. Disagree­ ment with this assumption need not lead-as Diller had already stated-to an acceptance of Ziircher's proposal that Euripides created no consistent characters, but made them all subordinate to the dramatic ef­ fectiveness of the moment. 56 55 Diller suggests in this that Pcnthcus loses the battle of croq,fot. He produces evidence to show that the Bacchae and the Ion have a remarkable correspondence in structure (p. 488): 'frcilich ist dcr Ion das untragischc Gcgcnstiick zu den Bakchen'. Sec p. 75ff., and note 187. 56 W. Zurcher, Die Darstellung des Menschen im Drama des Euripides, Basel 1947. THE AUDIENCE RESPONSE 21 I believe that one should not rely exclusively here on Aristotle, who ascribes greater importance to the plot than to the characters (Poetics 1450a 20 ff.). The greater importance of the plot is given by the nature of the literary work itself, which is a stage play intended for performance. After all, there is no reason to suppose that the ancient spectator of a dramatic performance followed it in any other way than we do; that is in a continuous response to the action. This response is forward looking: expectations are continually being awakened and disappointed in the audience, and this includes expectations about the characters. The spectator's activity is ruled by the dramatic situation of the moment. An exception must perhaps be made for the psycho-drama, in so far as this has the object of revealing the motives of a given character by means of the dramatic action. We then end up, however, with a dramatic case history; even Ibsen (who is sometimes compared with Euripides) wrote plays which cannot be confined within such a narrow compass. In Pentheus, as with most characters in most literary dramas, we are dealing with an imaginary person, who is thought of by the poet not in terms of his personality, but in terms of the action within which he must operate. In doing this the poet naturally imposes on himself all sorts of restrictions; he takes into account the function of the person, the recognizability of such a person, and so on, but still the character of the person exists only by virtue of the action in which he appears. Diller was not wrong in raising objections 'gegen eine Psychologie, die mit Hilfe von Momente, die jenseits des dramatischen Spiels liegen, zu motivieren versucht' (p. 477). When therefore we ask ourselves why a character in a play acts in such or such a way, we can best look for a reliable answer in the action, and at the moment that this action is being performed; methods based on assembling from the text random statements by the characters leave much to be desired. The action at the moment that it is performed has been written by the poet with his eye on the audience; what we must study is the audience's probable response to the action. It is there that the intention of the poet lies; there too perhaps lies an answer to questions about a character or about his motives for action. This picture of the situation is really too simple. From the previous chapter it is abundantly clear how far opinions diverge when people describe Euripides' intentions with the Bacchae. This could not happen if the audience's response and the author's intention corresponded closely with each other; but one meets as great a divergence of appraisal in the audience's response to a dramatic work, as one does in the response of readers to a literary work; a modern illustration of this is, as we have seen, the response of the audience to Pasolini's Teorema. On the other hand we must stick to the assumption that the intention of the dramatic .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Iphigenia in Aulis by Euripides Translated by Nicholas Rudall Directed by Charles Newell
    STUDY GUIDE Photo of Mark L. Montgomery, Stephanie Andrea Barron, and Sandra Marquez by joe mazza/brave lux, inc Sponsored by Iphigenia in Aulis by Euripides Translated by Nicholas Rudall Directed by Charles Newell SETTING The action takes place in east-central Greece at the port of Aulis, on the Euripus Strait. The time is approximately 1200 BCE. CHARACTERS Agamemnon father of Iphigenia, husband of Clytemnestra and King of Mycenae Menelaus brother of Agamemnon Clytemnestra mother of Iphigenia, wife of Agamemnon Iphigenia daughter of Agamemnon and Clytemnestra Achilles son of Peleus Chorus women of Chalcis who came to Aulis to see the Greek army Old Man servant of Agamemnon, was given as part of Clytemnestra’s dowry Messenger ABOUT THE PLAY Iphigenia in Aulis is the last existing work of the playwright Euripides. Written between 408 and 406 BCE, the year of Euripides’ death, the play was first produced the following year in a trilogy with The Bacchaeand Alcmaeon in Corinth by his son, Euripides the Younger, and won the first place at the Athenian City Dionysia festival. Agamemnon Costume rendering by Jacqueline Firkins. 2 SYNOPSIS At the start of the play, Agamemnon reveals to the Old Man that his army and warships are stranded in Aulis due to a lack of sailing winds. The winds have died because Agamemnon is being punished by the goddess Artemis, whom he offended. The only way to remedy this situation is for Agamemnon to sacrifice his daughter, Iphigenia, to the goddess Artemis. Agamemnon then admits that he has sent for Iphigenia to be brought to Aulis but he has changed his mind.
    [Show full text]
  • Ion First Folio
    FIRST FOLIO Teacher Curriculum Guide Table of Contents Page Number Welcome to the About the Play Shakespeare Theatre Company’s Synopsis of Ion……………………………….2 production of Interview with Director Ethan McSweeny….3 Ion Family Life in Ion ……………………………..4 by Euripedes Intro to Greek Mythology and Drama…..….5 People and Places in Ion ...………………….6 This season, the Shakespeare Theatre Company presents seven plays by William Classroom Connections Shakespeare and other classic playwrights. Before and After the Performance….....……7 Consistent with STC's central mission to be Resource List, Standards of Learning……...8 the leading force in producing and preserving Theatre Etiquette………………………….….9 the highest quality classic theatre , the Education Department challenges learners of The First Folio Teacher Curriculum Guide for all ages to explore the ideas, emotions and Ion was developed by the Shakespeare principles contained in classic texts and to Theatre Company Education Department, discover the connection between classic with articles compiled and written by Abby theatre and our modern perceptions. We Jackson and Michelle Jackson. Layout and hope that this First Folio Teacher Curriculum editing by Caroline Alexander. Guide will prove useful as you prepare to bring your students to the theatre! For the 2008-09 season, the Education Department will publish First Folio Teacher Curriculum Guides for our productions of Romeo and Juliet, Twelfth Night and Ion. First Folio Guides provide information and activities to help students form a personal connection to the play before attending the production. First Folio Guides contain material about the playwrights, their world and their works. Also included are approaches to exploring the plays and Next Steps productions in the classroom before and after If you would like more information on how the performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Nagy Commentary on Euripides, Herakles
    Informal Commentary on Euripides, Herakles by Gregory Nagy 97 The idea of returning from Hades implies a return from death 109f The mourning swan... Cf. the theme of the swansong. Cf. 692ff. 113 “The phantom of a dream”: cf. skias onar in Pindar Pythian 8. 131f “their father’s spirit flashing from their eyes”: beautiful rendition! 145f Herakles’ hoped-for return from Hades is equated with a return from death, with resurrection; see 297, where this theme becomes even more overt; also 427ff. 150 Herakles as the aristos man: not that he is regularly described in this drama as the best of all humans, not only of the “Greeks” (also at 183, 209). See also the note on 1306. 160 The description of the bow as “a coward’s weapon” is relevant to the Odysseus theme in the Odyssey 203 sôzein to sôma ‘save the body’... This expression seems traditional: if so, it may support the argument of some linguists that sôma ‘body’ is derived from sôzô ‘save’. By metonymy, the process of saving may extend to the organism that is destined to be saved. 270 The use of kleos in the wording of the chorus seems to refer to the name of Herakles; similarly in the wording of Megara at 288 and 290. Compare the notes on 1334 and 1369. 297 See at 145f above. Cf. the theme of Herakles’ wrestling with Thanatos in Euripides Alcestis. 342ff Note the god-hero antagonism as expressed by Amphitryon. His claim that he was superior to Zeus in aretê brings out the meaning of ‘striving’ in aretê (as a nomen actionis derived from arnumai; cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Dionysus (3): the God's Epiphanies in the Bacchae
    CHAPTER EIGHT DIONYSUS (3): THE GOD'S EPIPHANIES IN THE BACCHAE In comparing the Homeric hymn to Dionysus with the Bacchae (p. 123) it has been established that in his play Euripides prevented the ap­ pearance of the actor portraying Dionysus from acquiring the naturalness of an epic epiphany; the poet achieved this by continually bringing the audience face to face with the fact that the appearance of the Lydian had an epiphanic character, but that at the same time this epiphanic character was not experienced by Pentheus; in other words, the poet applied a sort of alienation effect. It was then suggested that Euripides weaves together the epiphanic motives in his plot into the principium actionis: the con­ tinuous oppressive or liberating presence of a god among mortals. Con­ sideration of the epiphanic action of the god in the Bacchae supports these claims. In the prologue and the exodos of the Bacchae we meet a theatrical con­ vention frequently used by Euripides, the appearance of a divinity on the stage. This appearance can be called a stage epiphany; from the spec­ tator's point of view these appearances have no referential aspects of meaning, because the way in which the god speaks his prologue or ap­ pears as a deus ex machina on the tragic stage, does not refer to the way in which gods might be perceived in the reality outside the theatre. This stage epiphany therefore stands outside the categories of epic, mythical, cult and soteriological epiphanies (p. 114 f. ), and the action ofthe god taking part in the complications of the plot is in strong contrast to it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ancient Reception of Euripides' Bacchae from Athens to Byzantium
    Simon Perris and Fiachra Mac Góráin The ancient reception of Euripides’ Bacchae from Athens to Byzantium Abstract: This chapter offers a reception history of Euripides’ Bacchae from its original production until its intertextual transformation in the Byzantine Christus Patiens. It traces a broad arc from Classical Athens through the Roman Empire, taking in also Hellenistic Alexandria, the Greek-speaking East, Christianity, and Byzantine literature. By examining the cultural contexts and inflections of the different receptions of one poetic text – Greek, Roman and Italian, ‘Eastern’, and Christian – it exposes distinctions between religious or cultural attitudes to Bac- chus/Dionysus across a broad range of Greek and Latin sources. The discussion is divided into four thematic sections, within which receptions are mostly pre- sented in chronological order: Classic Bacchae; Performances; Narratives; and Christian discourse. These sections encompass drama, epic, didactic, epyllion, historiography, biography, epigram, scholarly citations, and theological texts. A selection of the most significant case studies receive in-depth discussion in the body of the chapter; for completeness, the reception history of Bacchae is filled out by listing additional receptions in summary form in an appendix. Introduction Euripides’ Bacchae was undoubtedly the single most influential literary text for constructions of Dionysus throughout Greco-Roman antiquity. In this chapter, we examine how receptions of the play across the spectrum of Greek and Roman literature act as a barometer for cultural attitudes to Dionysus. Many of the most significant and revealing receptions occur in Latin texts or in Greek texts that deal with Roman subjects, whether Plutarch’s Antony, Greek epigrams about Italian pantomime performances, or Christian writings polemicizing against Greek and Roman cults.
    [Show full text]
  • Euripides and Gender: the Difference the Fragments Make
    Euripides and Gender: The Difference the Fragments Make Melissa Karen Anne Funke A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2013 Reading Committee: Ruby Blondell, Chair Deborah Kamen Olga Levaniouk Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Classics © Copyright 2013 Melissa Karen Anne Funke University of Washington Abstract Euripides and Gender: The Difference the Fragments Make Melissa Karen Anne Funke Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Ruby Blondell Department of Classics Research on gender in Greek tragedy has traditionally focused on the extant plays, with only sporadic recourse to discussion of the many fragmentary plays for which we have evidence. This project aims to perform an extensive study of the sixty-two fragmentary plays of Euripides in order to provide a picture of his presentation of gender that is as full as possible. Beginning with an overview of the history of the collection and transmission of the fragments and an introduction to the study of gender in tragedy and Euripides’ extant plays, this project takes up the contexts in which the fragments are found and the supplementary information on plot and character (known as testimonia) as a guide in its analysis of the fragments themselves. These contexts include the fifth- century CE anthology of Stobaeus, who preserved over one third of Euripides’ fragments, and other late antique sources such as Clement’s Miscellanies, Plutarch’s Moralia, and Athenaeus’ Deipnosophistae. The sections on testimonia investigate sources ranging from the mythographers Hyginus and Apollodorus to Apulian pottery to a group of papyrus hypotheses known as the “Tales from Euripides”, with a special focus on plot-type, especially the rape-and-recognition and Potiphar’s wife storylines.
    [Show full text]
  • Founding Athens: Ion and Origin Myth.
    Founding Athens: Ion and origin myth.! Athenian drama:! ! •"concentrates on specific episodes in a larger myth story ! ! •"focuses on human personality (and psychology)! •"investigates relationships in the family and in society! ! •"is radical in questioning the gods ! But if I aimed for a place in the first ranks of the city and strove to become someone, I would be detested by the powerless while those with ability, but not eager for public life, would ridicule me for being foolish…And then again, if I took positions from those who had them, I would be thwarted by men with knowledge, who know how the system works. ! paraphrase of Euripides Ion 595-600! Procession with religious image.! Pietrafitta, Italy! image©Sebo Theatre Dionysus Athens, ca 350 BCE! image©ARTstor! Actors with masks! Pronomos vase! 400 BCE! http://www.beazley.ox.ac.uk/images/ pottery/painters/keypieces/tiverios/33- p197-medium.jpg Sophocles Oidipous at Colonos. Segobriga Festival, 2000.# .! Mask design: Thanos Vovolis. Stage director: Gemma Gomez. Photo © Thanos Vovolis http://www.didaskalia.net/issues/vol7no1/vovolis_zamboulakis/image11.html ca. 620-480 BC: Archaic Period! Aeschylus ca. 533: introduction of the City Dionysia at Athens (Thespis)! 508/7: establishment of the Athenian democracy by Cleisthenes! 523-456 BCE ca. 499: Aeschylus' first dramatic production! 484: Aeschylus' first victory! ! 479-323 BC: Classical Period! ca. 468: Sophocles' first production! Sophocles 458: Aeschylus' Oresteia! 456/5: death of Aeschylus! 495-405 BCE 455: Euripides' first dramatic production! 447-432: construction of the Parthenon! ca. 442: Sophocles' Antigone! 441: Euripides' first victory! 431: 431: Euripides' Medea; beginning of the Peloponnesian War! Euripides ca.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bacchae of Euripides
    The Bacchae of Euripides By Wole Soyinka Directed by Prof. Judyie Al-Bilali Dramaturgy by Prof. Megan Lewis STUDY GUIDE Contact: Prof Megan Lewis [email protected] DIRECTOR’S NOTE Dionysus and his magnificent initiates, the Bacchantes, have come back for me. I met them twenty years ago when I directed this same adaptation by distinguished Nigerian Nobel Laureate, Wole Soyinka. I embraced his vision as it foregrounds the social and political transformations inherent to the ancient drama, and now two decades later, Soyinka’s script rings even more true as we face unprecedented environmental, ecological, and spiritual challenges. A play is relevant after 2,400 years because it illuminates primal forces, notable among them, sexuality. Dionysus, called by many names including ‘The Liberator’ has often symbolized gender fluidity. In the rigid caste system of ancient Greece, his devotees included slaves, women, and foreigners -- allowing those usually excluded to participate in the annual Dionysian festivals. Our play is set in 2020, just across the threshold into the upcoming decade, at the pivot point of a new era in human history. Our location is Gaia, the mythological Greek name recognizing our beloved and beleaguered planet Earth as a sentient, living goddess. Right now, Gaia demands our attention. She calls us beyond ideology to unity, a call we must heed for our survival as a species. Myth is how we navigate and ultimately evolve both individual and collective psyches. Myth must change for us to grow. Artists are the antennae for society and we are re-imagining Euripides’ myth of Dionysus to address our need for balance between reason and passion.
    [Show full text]
  • What Melos for Troy? Blending of Lyric Genres in the First Stasimon Of
    Giovanni Fanfani What melos forTroy? Blending of Lyric Genres in the First Stasimon of Euripides’ Trojan Women 1Introduction The first stasimon of Trojan Women is anarrativeaccount of the last dayofTroy, amelic Iliou Persis consistingofasingle triadic system and depicting the Tro- jans’ welcoming of the Wooden Horse into the city,theirrejoicinginchoral danc- ing at night,and their violent ruin at the hand of the Achaeans. Labelled by Kranz as one of Euripides’‘dithyrambic’ stasima,¹ the song has been seen by scholars as representative of the pictorial style that characterizes late Euripidean choral odes.² Morerecently, certain recognizable patterns informingEuripides’ ‘dithyrambic’ and pictorial lyric have been reassessed by Eric Csapo and posi- tioned within the wider picture of the dramatist’sengagement with New Musical verse.³ By calling attention to the growingamountofmusical imagery of aDio- nysiac stamp in the sung sections of Euripides’ plays from ca. 420BConwards, Csapo defines asignificant trait of poetics that locates the playwright at the fore- Iwould liketothankV.Bers, M. Ercoles, A. Ford, A. Henrichs and N. Weissfor helpful comments on an earlier version of thischapter.Iamespeciallygrateful to P. LeVen forher valuable criti- cism and suggestions on different drafts of thispaper,and to the editors forcorrections and advice. Researchfor thiswork hasbeen generously supportedbythe Danish Council forInde- pendent Research and FP7 Marie CurieActions ‒ COFUND (DFF ‒ 1321–00158) through aMOBI- LEX grant.The text of Trojan Women reproduces Diggle’sOCT unless otherwise stated. English translations areadapted from the most recent Loeb editions. Forstructural features of these choral odes,defined as ‘self-contained ballad-like narratives’ (‘völlig absolut stehende balladeskeErzählung’)see Kranz 1933,254,and in general 228–65,see 253, 258f.inparticular on Eur.
    [Show full text]
  • The Allied Duality of Dionysus and Apollo in Euripides'
    When Doves Drink: The Allied Duality of Dionysus and Apollo in Euripides’ Ion The element of duality in Euripides’ Ion has been addressed by scholars in a variety of contexts, and has been framed in the following ways: the dual aspects of divine and mortal characters (Kindt 2007), the play’s dueling genres of tragedy and comedy (Hunter 2011), and the duo of cultural identities displayed (Zeitlin 1989). While a fluctuation of divinity is recognizable in the appearances of gods on stage, such as Hermes and Athena, or off stage, such as Apollo, this presentation will investigate the role of another god, Dionysus, whose individual significance Zeitlin and Hunter have discussed at length. However, I propose to look at the role of Dionysus not as an individual figure, but as one forming a pair with Apollo in the Ion. I contend that Apollo and Dionysus cooperatively shape the underlying duality of the Ion, and I explore the manifestations of this duality with an examination of the play’s physical and spatial settings as representing symbolic ideas expressed by Euripides. Because the Ion is set in the temple of Apollo at Delphi but performed at the Theater of Dionysus in Athens, the audience experienced both locales simultaneously alongside their religious and mythological connotations. This paper illuminates how the cooperative relationship between Apollo and Dionysus in the Ion is physically suggested by the intimate closeness of Apollo’s oracle at Delphi and the torchlight rituals of Dionysus on Mount Parnassus (Ion 714). The ritual rotation between Apollo and Dionysus at Delphi, where Dionysus took over while Apollo was absent among the Hyperboreans in the winter, highlights the link between them (Burkert 1985).
    [Show full text]
  • IPHIGENIA in a ULIS Translated by Charles R
    IPHIGENIA IN A ULIS Translated by Charles R. Walker « IPHIGENIA IN AULIS » gives her life (much as Joan of Arc did) in accordance with what she INTRODUCTION TO regards as the "divine will" and the needs ofher country. IPHIGENIA IN AULIS I have suggested that the play is more modern than most Greek tragedies; perhaps it is more modern than any of them. But in what sense is it modern? First of all in techniques of the theater: it is full of Lm Iphigenia in Aulis was produced, together with the Bacchae and new dramatic devices as well as a concentration of old ones. Instead the Alcmaeon, at the Great Dionysia in March, 405 B.C., a few months of theforn1al Euripidean prologue giving the audience background after Euripides' death. It seems probable that Euripides' son (some for _the plot, the~e isalively duologue full of dramatic tension be­ say his nephew) produced the play and perhaps filled in parts of the tween Agamemnon and a servant. (An old-style prologue also exists script which Euripides had left incomplete at the time ofhis death. and in this version is integrated into the dialogue, ll. 49-114.) The The play is full ofinvention and dramatic reversals. Some classical chor_l1s is no Jqnger essential to the dramatic action but it often critics, dubbing it pure melodrama, have felt that it represented a esta~lishes the mood. It consists in this play of women who have woeful falling-off from the sterner standards of Greek tragedy. Most crossed over from their native Chalcis to Aulis, apparently as sight­ students of dramatic literature find it an exciting "transition piece," seers to see the heroes and the famous Greek fleet.
    [Show full text]
  • Plutarch's Pyrrhus and Euripides' Phoenician Women
    Histos () – PLUTARCH’S PYRRHUS AND EURIPIDES’ PHOENI- CIAN WOMEN : BIOGRAPHY AND TRAGEDY ON PLEONECTIC PARENTING The principal concern of this paper is to explore the relevance of Euripides’ Phoenician Women to Plutarch’s Life of Pyrrhus. It will be argued that the rele- vance of the play is much more substantial than usually acknowledged: that its relevance goes beyond the two direct quotations from the play which oc- cur in the Life . It is worth stressing at the outset that of the five quotations from the play in Plutarch’s extant Lives as a whole, two are in the Pyrrhus : that may plausibly be claimed as a concentration ( Pyrrh. and ; cf. Demetr . ; Sull . ; Comp. Nic.-Crass . ). In what follows, I shall attempt to explain how and why the play matters to a reading of the Life . The essence of my claim is that the reader’s knowledge of Euripides’ play is made to provide what may be termed ‘added value’ to Plutarch’s Life , with the further validation of Eu- ripidean authority. The general relevance to Plutarch’s Lives of Athenian tragedy (and in- deed of Homeric epic) has long been recognised. And Judith Mossman has explored tragic and epic elements in the Pyrrhus in particular. The aim of the present paper is to draw attention to the special relevance of a specific play to this Life . I shall argue that a reading of the Life should entail not only a broad awareness of tragedy (and epic), but a sustained memory of a particu- lar play as the Life unfolds.
    [Show full text]