A$ Document Template

GILLYFLOWER FARM, LOSTWITHIEL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT

DECEMBER 2020 REV A CONTENTS PAGE

1.0 ExecutiveSummary 3

2..0 Purposeofstatement 4

3.0 Descriptionofthesite 5

4.0 Identificationofthenearbyheritageassets 8

5.0 Visualassessment 9

6.0 Assessmentofthesettingofidentifiedassets 13

7.0 Proposeddevelopment 21

8.0 ImpactAssessment 25

9.0 PolicyConsiderations 27

10.0 Conclusions 30

Appendix1-LinkstoAssetDescriptions 31

This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of my client and unless otherwise agreed in writing by K Metcalfe Heritage Ltd, no other party may use, make use of, or rely on its contents. This report has been compiled using resources agreed with my client and in accordance with an agreed scope of works. No liability is accepted by K Metcalfe Heritage Ltd for any use of this report other than the purposes for which it was prepared.

20.70 | Gillyflower Farm | Heritage Impact Assessment | Rev A 1.0 EXECUTIVESUMMARY

The aim of this document is to consider the potential impact of proposed development of a world-class rare species research, development and educational facility on part of the former Lostwithiel golf course on the nearby heritage assets.

This assessment follows the guidance in Historic England’s documents Advice Note 12 “Statements of Heritage Significance”, and Good Practice in Planning 3 “The Setting of Heritage Assets”.It identifies the heritage assets that may be affected by the development and provides an assessment of their existing significance and the contribution made by their setting. A description of the development follows, andan assessment of the impacts oneach asset. A summary conclusion of the nearby assets and their significance as assessed is:

Restormel Castle (Scheduled Monument) including Lanhydrock Registered Park and Garden. The significance of Restormel Castle is very high, the contribution that the setting (including the RPG) makes to this significance is very high and the contribution of the site to the setting is high as part of the wider landscape, but minimal.

Roman Fortlet (Scheduled Monument).The significance of the remains of the Roman fortlet is very high, the contribution that the setting makes to this significance is medium and the contribution of the site to the setting is neutral.

Restormel Manor and Restormel Farm (Grade II Listed Buildings). The significance of Restormel Manor and the Farm is high, the contribution that the setting makes to this significance is high and the contribution of the site to the setting is negligible.

Battle of Lostwithiel Battleground (Registered Battleground). The significance of the Registered Battlefield is very high, the contribution that the setting makes to this significance is high and the contribution of the site to the setting is high, but minimal.

The orientation, massing and materiality of the proposals has been developed from investigation of the topography and views in order to reduce the visual impact on the surrounding landscape., Whilst planting of the orchards will fill the valley side with rare fruit trees that will develop a self-sustaining local industry. The summary conclusion of the potential impacts as assessed is:

Restormel Castle including Lanhydrock Registered Park and Garden. The development has the potential to have a limited negative impact on the setting, however because of the minimal contribution of the site, the distances involved and the previous use of the site, this impact will be within the lower end of the less than substantial range.

Roman Fortlet.The development will not impact its significance or setting.

Restormel Manor and Restormel Farm. The development will not impact its significance or setting.

Battle of Lostwithiel Battleground. The presence of the owners accommodation will not cause any harm to the significance or setting of the battlefield, however it is understood that archaeological recording is likely to be required in this area during the construction phase.

The less than substantial harm identified has been weighed against the social, economic and environmental public benefits of the proposal, which are substantial and, on balance, are considered to outweigh the minor impact.

20.70 | Gillyflower Farm | Heritage Impact Assessment | Rev A 2.0 PURPOSE OF STATEMENT

This assessment has been prepared for the owners of Gillyflower Farm in order to consider the potential impact of a new rare plant orchard and associated on the setting of nearby heritage assets.

The existing site is the former Lostwithiel Golf Course that was purchased in 2016 to develop a a world-class facility for the research, growing and use of rare fruit and vegetable varieties. This will include the propagation of rare seeds to be planted out into the orchards; a 1acre potager area based on those at the Lost Gardens of Heligan for the cultivation of rare European vegetable varieties, a main Hub that will include a cookery school, training facilities (that will be linked to those at Heligan and the Eden Project), leisure training facilities and associated operations such as a distillery and fruit storage. In addition, eco-drum residential pods will be provided, linked to the facilities on the site and a single residential property will be provided as owners accommodation to the east of the site.

The built elements have been designed to have a light footprint, physically, ecologically and environmentally.

In terms of the landscape, the site itself is entirely contained within the former golf course, which can be seen on aerial photographs with man-made greens and fairways. It is contained within the surrounding designation of an Area of Great Landscape Value. To the north is an area of ancient replanted woodland.

There are no designated heritage assets on the site and it is outside the Lostwithiel Conservation Area but to the north is a Registered Battleground, to the north west is Restormel Castle (Scheduled Monument), Restormel Manor, (Grade II Listed Building) and Restormel Farmhouse with attached Stables and Barn (Grade II Listed Building). These assets and their settings and the potential impact of the proposed development are considered in this report and can be seen on the map on page 8. Links to the separate designation entires is in Appendix 1.

The Cornwall and Scilly Historic Environment record has been consulted via the Cornwall interactive mapping pages. As well as the designations mentioned above, there is one undesignated point marker on the site and the whole site is noted as being within an undesignated Civil War battlefield site.

The Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979 (as amended) is the primary legislation protecting Scheduled Monuments (SM), however section 2.2 of this document does not require any specific consents for development within the setting of a SM; this is covered within the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) under the provisions of protecting heritage assets.

Consideration has been given to Section 66 (1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 in relation to the setting of the listed buildings.

This assessment focusses on understanding the significance of the nearby heritage assets and how this significance may be impacted by the proposals. It has been provided in accordance with the requirements of the NPPF, paragraph 189:

Para 189: In determining applications, local planning authorities should require an applicant to describe the significance of any heritage assets affected, including any contribution made by their setting. The level of detail should be proportionate to the assets’ importance and no more than is sufficient to understand the potential impact of the proposal on their significance. As a minimum the relevant historic environment record should have been consulted and the heritage assets assessed using appropriate expertise where necessary. Where a site on which development is proposed includes or has the potential to include heritage assets with archaeological interest, local planning authorities should require developers to submit an appropriate desk-based assessment and, where necessary, a field evaluation.

The following Historic England documents have been consulted in the production of this report:

• Advice Note 12 “Statements of Heritage Significance” (October 2019) • Good Practice in Planning 3 “The Setting of Heritage Assets” (December 2017)

This report has been prepared by Katharine Metcalfe IHBC of K Metcalfe Heritage Limited, an appropriately qualified and experienced Heritage professional. Opinions expressed have been reach through primary research, site visits, and reference to previous reports by others.

Unless otherwise stated, all plans reproduced in this document are courtesy of Roderick James Architects. Unless otherwise stated, all photographs were taken by K Metcalfe Heritage in October and November 2020.

20.70 | Gillyflower Farm | Heritage Impact Assessment | Rev A 3.0 DESCRIPTIONOFTHESITE

The site is located to the north east of Lostwithiel town centre on the former Lostwithiel Golf and Country Club grounds.

The site is bounded to the west by Cott Road and to the north and east by Polscoe Road. The southern boundary is marked by hedges. The area to the west of the site, enclosed by the River Fowey, will be retained as the golf course.

There is a fall of approximately 40m from north east to southwest, and the existing copse areas and tree lines will be retained to provide screening and retain the natural biodiversity of the land.

From the north east corner

20.70 | Gillyflower Farm | Heritage Impact Assessment | Rev A The Topographic 3D full site area image below (courtesy of Kemp Engineering and Surveying) provides a full scope of the current Gillyflower site, including the existing tree planting, potager and retained copses.

50.14

48.88 49.35 49.50 50.06

49.38

Fence

Wir 49.55 49.94

High

m 49.37

Pos 1.2 51.26

48.51 48.56 50.60 51.51

49.33

50.84

48.39 N 49.71

50.65

49.07 49.97 52.11 60800N 47.75 50.98

48.31 49.40 51.70 Pos 2 m t 50.17 Highan d Wir e Fence 48.74 49.43 51.58 51.89 53.02 50.86 51.81

47.04 52.37 48.63 51.69

47.99 50.01 53.00 53.52 51.54 52.63

53.20 54.25 53.75 49.98 54.24 54.55 52.29 48.44 53.29 48.93 52.64 54.26 54.42 54.38 55.57 46.36 51.19 54.21 50.40 58.91 53.26 54.09 47.94 50.22 51.25 54.19 51.91 47.43 48.82 57.34

54.35 57.34 57.5 51.42 52.87 55.16 56.23 59.86 50.30 53.47 49.04 57.35

49.58 50.61 58.0 58.41 54.35 54.63 57.85 58.24 57.51 58.26 Multi Bole Large Stone 49.18 51.77 55.70 57.84 61.29

52.68 53.29 57.81

54.70 59.0 58.5 54.06 60.65 50.78 60.12 62.76 47.57 58.38 59.72 54.44 Multi Bole 62.03 45.68 52.83 46.62 56.99 58.31 59.55 51.59 54.91 60.55 53.1653.66 59.53 59.5 63.05 58.93 60.35 61.09 58.82 60.0 54.32 59.48 60.32 48.24 49.07 60.5 61.94 59.31 60.23 47.37 52.26 57.63 59.50 61.0 61.59 64.57 50.58 56.31 59.70

61.5 61.58 54.95 60.10Rocks 59.97 62.28 46.45 62.0 57.41 Multi Bole 61.52 63.20

45.85 46.87 60.27 62.5 45.20 Ston 62.98 59.47 e Wall 59.92 59.47 61.13 Mult GP 59.82 62.94 50.86 58.97 62.85 i Bole 60.72 52.94 56.71 58.95 GP 60.26 46.30 48.62 48.59 57.23 59.40 60.72 60.60 62.90 45.73 46.63 59.76 48.58 59.67 48.67 54.33 57.78 62.33 64.19 46.69 48.54 57.65 60.15 56.60 62.0 45.00 46.23 48.69 55.78 58.00 45.85 51.09 57.35 58.89 62.5 63.0 48.67 48.61 61.5 48.77 61.0 63.74 48.56 61.93 63.5 60.5 52.79 60.0 48.48 48.56 64.0 48.37 63.18 46.64 48.75 58.19 61.70 54.29 59.5 50.87 64.35

55.14 59.0

44.72 56.72 45.47 48.30 45.58 48.49 58.5 63.85 45.80 48.31 58.11 48.65 62.72 46.25 48.09 58.0

48.13 59.38 64.36 50.74 57.5 60750N 52.90 57.0 48.29 60.87 63.96 48.22 48.49 56.5

48.09 56.0 54.05 63.13 55.00 43.88 50.52 44.96 45.94 64.58 47.79 55.5 56.64 45.05 57.52 61.78 48.11 48.46 52.62 64.26 55.0 58.57 48.03 47.96 48.19 44.89 54.5

44.82 54.0 48.30 45.74 50.61 47.75 47.80 60.15 53.5 63.35 64.61 42.94 52.19 48.04 53.0 62.02 44.79 64.27 53.22 54.07 44.84 47.59 50.46 52.5 42.70 48.09 55.68 42.76 45.32 44.44 47.52 47.60 52.0 43.32 56.97 44.25 60.93 44.52 51.5 47.88 63.63 64.83 45.32 47.46 47.43 51.0 51.97 64.48 STNK2 Z=47.554 50.5 42.94 43.67 50.0 47.73 62.15 48.96 45.72 47.65 47.40 47.40 50.09 47.53 50.76 49.5 59.96 43.06 55.10 42.17 42.22 52.09 53.65 61.11 42.54 49.0 65.11 42.87 63.81 46.01 47.34 43.06 44.24 48.5 48.0 Pos 64.5 64.68 2 41.98 m t an High d 42.73 57.53 62.21 Wir e 43.12 47.99 64.0 Fence 58.05 47.27 65.38 43.97 63.5 42.38 45.07 60.36 49.19 63.0 45.70 47.5 65.02 42.04 61.31 43.44 50.63 46.74 62.5 64.01 44.15 51.91 Tree Orchard 47.0 53.26 55.67 42.24 Soil Mound 62.0 41.67 47.67 42.10 62.31 65.60

44.07 58.84

46.5 56.52 42.08 42.33 61.5 65.24 41.42 43.23 45.73 44.83 44.42 45.41 60.42 65.97 42.16 43.19 46.0 48.89 61.0 61.32 64.15

45.5 46.68 43.27 65.50 42.39 44.16 51.74 45.0 50.37 57.37 60.5 66.57 62.25 40.94 67.23 67.71 53.20 59.07 66.67 47.67 55.69 44.5 54.61 67.37 GP 60.0 86.3586.5 64.58 EP 86.96Multi Bole 43.82 44.0 66.02 40.70 87.11 66.95 GP86.54 86.0 87.01 87.29 43.5 48.72 59.5 87.34 OHW Multi Bole 46.11 60.37 61.39 85.69 Multi Bole 42.41 87.28 85.82 85.73 42.83 49.96 OHW 85.63 85.62 43.52 59.0 OHW 42.64 OHW 85.21 43.0 56.16 67.36 85.65 85.5 STNK8 62.71 85.35 85.50 57.70 Z=61.772 65.15 85.43 85.41 51.13 OHW 58.5 85.36 85.22 OHW 68.51 OHW 41.18 45.19 67.03 85.10 85.49 85.17 40.50 42.5 59.12 85.34 85.36 52.28 69.63 85.32 85.39 58.0 OHW 85.08 85.21 85.23 70.37 OHW OHW 85.24 42.0 85.18 85.26 86.58 80.72 84.95 Multi Bole 40.90 85.29 85.14 85.15 53.43 80.09 85.16 41.5 68.02 70.0 79.30 OHW 85.00 86.26 86.15 86.07 46.46 57.5 61.39 86.00 63.23 78.37 OHW 86.13 85.10 Multi Bole OHW 86.29 54.06 55.10 60.56 65.77 77.33 85.41 86.10 Stone Wall 86.22 40.35 40.33 79.97 GP Stone Wall Multi Bole 84.65 56.68 t and Wire Fence 80.86 GP GP 86.25 Multi Bole 41.0 76.55 Pos 80.50 86.20 86.22 GP 86.18 57.0 69.18 70.45 OHW 84.88 86.47 84.42 60700N 78.19 84.82 86.09 84.52 55.22 71.44 High OHW 85.73 85.06 84.97 2m 77.0 OHW 86.14 84.85 72.45 76.01 84.59 e Fence 42.62 73.48 86.12 84.89 84.77 84.53 Post and Wir 40.5 47.48 74.41 84.89 84.59 40.72 41.38 69.5 70.36 75.32 80.72 84.78 84.73 84.51 2m High 42.38 44.45 77.08 OHW GP 84.57 GP 84.20 OHW 84.66 71.28 OHW 84.5 41.16 56.5 59.21 84.21 84.63 84.49 84.84 56.81 63.95 72.29 75.84 84.44 84.00 40.0 48.58 56.06 69.0 73.28 81.52 74.23 75.19 76.25 OHW 84.26 84.47

67.69 82.98 TOCH:85.82 40.09 41.17 45.70 61.60 80.98 84.31 OHW OHW 82.51 76.5 81.80 83.12 83.84 84.30 84.62 84.40

84.37 84.58 41.80 49.93 55.58 68.5 83.23 84.27 84.16 40.47 79.14 83.61 84.65 39.70 56.0 56.31 OHW 84.32 40.51 46.72 60.77 68.93 81.0 83.62 83.98 84.14 40.32 OHW 84.14 54.42 78.24 79.78 OHW 81.30 82.33 82.78 84.24 51.17 57.08 77.16 82.97 84.23 39.79 68.0 81.66 83.86 83.80 41.35 64.60 76.15 84.29 83.94 55.5 76.0 OHW 52.49 83.48 84.22 83.52 OHW 80.04 84.56 40.92 41.84 43.84 47.70 75.44 OHW 39.52 67.5 69.67 70.72 83.18 83.60 84.0 83.96 84.32 41.74 43.53 54.78 71.88 82.99 53.78 56.66 84.15 39.60 41.45 62.04 72.97 74.77 83.43 83.72

84.02 Multi Bole 39.32 44.17 73.94 OHW 57.97 83.47 83.45 OHW OHW Stone Tee Marker 42.59 59.66 67.0 80.25 80.5 83.92 40.30 TOCH:84.86 40.00 41.50 41.98 48.84 75.5 Hardcore Track 65.43 83.5 83.80 55.0 41.21 45.48 OHW 80.62 39.20 54.87 66.5 83.82

OHW 83.97 39.20 Large Evergreen Conifers OHW 81.19 83.61 83.90 83.68 83.48 83.41 83.43 41.76 66.58 81.78 82.17 54.5 60.67 83.22 41.98 82.50 82.86 83.0 46.47 50.09 62.84 OHW OHW 38.78 57.01 OHW 41.35 66.0 75.0 80.0 39.40 54.59 77.80 83.63 83.43 67.56 78.48 54.0 76.96 OHW 40.99 OHW 38.39 41.09 51.25 65.5 75.99 OHW 83.53 42.99 47.53 43.39 75.05 78.89 42.62 42.45 44.04 38.38 41.69 38.58 68.33 OHW 83.06 53.5 69.44 74.38 56.32 40.64 60.84 63.47 OHW 82.51 58.27 OHW 83.31 38.79 65.0 70.50 74.5 79.5 82.88 41.17 54.31 59.91 71.65 72.76 73.64 82.5 PO 37.93 52.27 79.12 37.61 48.78 83.13 82.73 OHW

41.04 57.20 64.5 OHW 45.25 56.63 OHW 83.05 83.02 40.77 41.86 53.31 82.86 37.82 79.61 83.03 38.18 53.0 55.05 Post and Wire Mesh Fence 55.72 64.50 74.0 82.87 82.41 OHW 79.0 80.20 80.80 82.56 50.09 OHW 81.15 1.3m High OHW 41.12 42.24 64.0 40.47 40.65 56.52 61.49 Tree Orchard 81.65 82.09 42.79 41.69 52.5 82.39 65.58 OHW 82.0 40.01 OHW 76.57 OHW 51.31 56.56 56.78 59.93 73.5 82.56 56.23 58.68 63.5 75.72 40.69 77.20 78.5 81.90 42.80 47.14 74.69 39.85 OHW 82.04 41.87 82.35 40.94 73.85 OHW OHW 52.0 63.0 66.63 77.57 52.35 73.0 82.61 56.05 62.12 67.79 68.94 81.79 41.21 57.57 73.05 82.37 42.28 48.22 55.37 OHW 78.0 39.56 42.63 71.16 OHW 81.5 69.92 72.13 OHW 40.07 43.08 57.03 Stone Mound 53.45 62.5 77.95 82.03 40.36 51.5 43.55 60.24 81.87 81.35 72.5 OHW 39.40 42.05 82.17 55.86 OHW 39.23 49.27 63.01 OHW 82.12 81.71 81.50 44.86 78.41 81.97 40.86 77.5 81.68 40.23 62.0 OHW 79.73 80.19 81.26 58.91 OHW 82.12 41.35 OHW 40.51 51.0 64.20 72.0 79.05 57.31 80.75 81.0 81.20 81.87 43.10 50.31 82.30 45.68 55.79 75.38 81.97 60.83 OHW 39.30 74.63 75.94 OHW OHW 38.89 41.46 65.14 73.80 77.0 81.76 56.62 61.5 71.5 72.80 50.5 57.75 OHW 42.31 51.21 40.09 46.64 76.31 81.32 41.98 72.09 OHW 65.99 OHW 81.48 59.32 66.99 71.27 80.5 81.33 68.09 69.23 70.28 40.01 71.0 OHW 76.5 Tree Orchard 81.77 81.91 50.0 61.50 OHW 54.82 OHW 76.72 47.59 52.12 82.19 43.37 61.0 81.52 57.02 STNK7 81.09 57.52 Z=71.397 81.16 55.84 OHW 70.5 Tree Orchard OHW OHW 77.22 80.63 38.99 81.11 80.73 40.01 53.07 49.5 76.0 80.0 81.03 80.78 39.33 62.56 77.91 81.67 48.68 53.84 80.35 OHW 78.52 44.46 Large Evergreen Conifers 57.73 78.99 79.55 80.78 OHW 80.44 OHW 60.5 70.0 80.04 39.65 81.67 82.00 49.0 73.56 40.61 Tree Orchard 74.30 OHW 63.61 80.32 80.91 80.63 OHW 75.5 40.05 OHW 80.57 49.71 72.52 80.63 45.61 69.5 79.5 58.22 60.18 81.40 81.63 81.58 81.64 41.00 41.52 56.91 OHW 81.80 39.94 71.37 41.78 80.94 OHW 80.46 48.5 60.78 70.59 OHW 80.74 60.0 64.36 75.09 80.31 69.0 69.62 75.0 42.32 42.80 46.53 50.64 59.5 66.21 67.42 68.58 OHW 81.56 80.43 39.04 65.12 80.75 81.55 OHW 80.37 39.46 42.64 80.78 80.05 54.66 OHW 53.51 79.0 81.36 80.10 57.41 60.78 41.12 GP 48.0 80.60 GP 55.94 59.0 75.52 80.09 81.58 43.41 68.5 OHW 81.60 42.58 61.45 80.37 Fence 42.98 OHW 79.99 OHW 43.19 57.58 58.5 80.62 e 39.48 76.28 74.5 79.73 81.60 80.27 42.73 47.16 80.44 77.75 81.11 41.28 47.5 59.12 77.02 79.33 79.70 Wir OHW 80.41 81.49 78.23 81.26 d 68.0 78.5 OHW 79.35 62.15 72.73 OHW 80.01 80.72 80.32 80.18 79.93 High an 39.80 43.93 44.40 57.56 58.02 61.09 73.32 79.51 t 80.40 40.64 80.28 80.12 m 44.11 71.82 OHW 79.70 80.34 42.62 48.13 OHW 74.0 52.39 58.0 67.5 OHW Pos 42.77 70.74 1.2 43.09 47.0 80.58 43.69 61.55 62.79 69.93 73.67 81.43 41.17 56.71 57.01 80.29 80.00 80.01 56.26 78.0 80.34 79.23 OHW

45.46 79.96 79.18 44.93 59.13 OHW 80.83 79.77 45.23 OHW 80.54 43.34 46.5 61.87 67.0 68.99 79.37 39.14 40.92 39.76 43.82 49.01 52.69 67.09 68.03 74.01 41.29 42.88 54.92 57.5 62.25 73.5 80.61 39.17 Hardcore 63.19 OHW 80.63 80.68 44.75 63.91 64.85 65.97 79.14 79.89 OHW 78.97 39.31 OHW

38.73 77.5 79.05 79.80 79.56 41.55 42.60 45.76 46.31 66.5 79.03 60650N 40.99 44.80 51.78 53.84 56.27 57.59 58.03 74.44 78.86 80.06 46.16 OHW 79.43 80.27

39.77 OHW 79.15 49.86 OHW 78.48 39.33 Stone Pile 42.00 57.0 59.26 61.26 41.85 45.52 46.0 52.05 73.0 66.0 75.07 80.04 56.64 57.28 76.97 78.01 40.43 46.62 OHW 75.78 76.52 77.55 79.16 OHW 47.30 55.60 61.76 71.67 OHW 77.0 39.37 59.94 70.79 79.00 45.62 47.11 51.39 50.54 79.08 78.23 39.05 39.43 40.08 46.56 65.5 OHW 79.20 OHW 72.21 78.58 42.09 OHW 78.36 40.71 72.5 78.92 39.25 45.5 52.21 68.58 56.5 61.68 78.14 47.49 50.97 54.69 57.22 57.52 58.13 79.09 60.22 76.5 78.99 46.43 OHW 48.24 65.0 67.52 72.54 78.89 78.63 OHW 48.07 56.01 OHW 46.53 78.20 58.60 62.27 65.40 66.40 78.05 40.46 40.66 47.49 78.73

38.88 42.16 42.57 63.08 48.42 56.0 56.26 64.07 OHW 72.0 38.55 45.0 64.5 OHW 78.55 OHW 72.92 43.49 47.36 53.34 58.31 78.34 39.58 76.0 78.62 49.12 77.85 78.12 42.03 47.53 60.39 78.63 78.68 48.95 OHW 77.63 77.89 OHW 48.45 59.43 70.23 OHW 78.45 40.45 49.16 64.0 73.49 78.04 40.91 71.5 75.68 77.24 78.38 78.54 48.33 49.87 55.5 58.00 75.12 77.68 49.64 Small Trees OHW 76.73 44.54 69.13 74.19 76.16 77.42 41.35 OHW OHW 75.5 38.90 41.16 48.43 57.10 60.15 63.5 Appro 78.32 78.20 51.85 55.25 67.89 77.25 49.71 71.27 77.84 67.13 OHW 44.5 39.34 55.0 x 77.37 45.36 49.31 OHW 56.77 57.70 OHW 71.0 39.57 40.29 50.29 77.95 38.96 49.12 66.17 Ht=1m 77.85 77.80 41.52 54.47 63.0 78.04 44.0 49.22 50.58 58.63 77.97 65.14 OHW 71.56 75.0 OHW 77.20 64.11 OHW 49.38 60.57 61.39 62.17 63.07 77.83 38.24 EP 77.04 49.50 77.58 42.04 Large Evergreen Conifers 58.83 62.5 77.08 OHW 70.5 Dense Vegetation 71.93 77.33 76.74

39.36 Dense Vegetation 38.55 OHW 53.53 57.24 OHW 76.58 46.20 77.59 41.59 42.85 43.5 54.5 74.5 76.16 47.17 72.48 OHW 74.00 59.17 62.0 68.53 73.20 74.54 Dense Vegetation 76.75 OHW OHW 75.65 41.41 70.0 77.17 52.40 56.59 57.82 43.0 OHW 76.64 76.49 47.99 77.53 OHW 40.24 66.93 OHW 74.0 43.92 76.73 51.31 54.0 54.73 61.5 49.01 56.66 77.34 76.94 49.25 69.83 40.67 65.93 40.46 50.72 57.67 60.10 39.66 OHW Pile of cut tree branches 49.56 76.34 76.98 69.5 76.96 76.78 OHW 38.54 38.84 56.12 OHW 64.80 76.85 77.07 76.98 40.91 44.81 55.42 76.05 49.91 60.67 70.30 42.5 59.40 61.0 62.63 63.65 76.69 PO 55.18 77.18 38.01 73.5 77.04 39.02 77.00 38.27 57.51 76.22 77.08 56.55 OHW 76.94 76.86 53.5 76.61 76.90 76.79 77.10 OHW Fence OHW 76.93 61.33 Collapse 77.09 48.54 77.57 e 48.74 53.84 69.0 70.63 76.99 48.47 77.01 76.35 41.31 60.5 76.73 Wir OHW 75.86 76.89 42.0 OHW 68.48 Standing Platform 76.79 d OHW 73.0 76.58 d 75.68 55.83 75.49 75.80 77.00 an High 56.13 Embankment 39.55 76.97 t 45.56 53.0 71.04 76.75 m OHW 75.03 39.22 42.16 46.56 66.46 74.56 76.56 77.02 76.38 75.37 39.41 60.0 OHW 77.06 OHW 68.5 76.71 38.03 40.80 Pos 75.35 37.88 1.2 73.77 38.73 72.43 76.25 71.65 73.15 75.96 41.5 52.88 65.18 68.80 76.36 76.75 38.84 OHW 72.5 75.70 76.73 40.63 OHW 39.41 OHW 39.64 47.30 59.5 64.36 76.68 52.5 76.06 76.97 Pos 43.19 54.11 2 50.05 75.97 68.0 m 63.34 76.23 t 37.96 39.96 OHW 69.18 76.87 39.39 39.78 75.18 an 48.15 62.31 75.66 High OHW 38.37 41.0 OHW 38.53 48.33 75.78 76.65 76.91 d 40.16 58.74 61.29 75.24 39.25 59.53 75.19 Wir 44.18 48.64 51.75 58.57 60.33 72.0 76.81 59.0 75.26 76.25 76.40 38.68 OHW 69.49 e 38.98 52.0 67.5 OHW 38.31 38.78 OHW 75.06 75.18 Fence

49.15 76.61 76.93 38.71 76.23 40.0 74.70 40.5 67.0 75.63 76.67 47.91 69.86 74.28 75.37 74.86 OHW

37.15 38.36 39.5 37.61 47.63 74.65 40.61 58.5 OHW 67.07 71.5 76.87 OHW 73.75 47.69 50.72 57.38 71.86 72.46 74.93 70.38 72.99 76.53 74.94 75.14 37.94 64.73 71.10 76.61 74.26 44.93 51.5 53.17 OHW Dense Vegetation 74.63 41.46 45.94 OHW OHW 76.62 58.0 63.65 67.60 75.06 76.19 74.70 75.05 76.61 74.29 40.05 66.5 Tree Orchard 71.0 38.43 49.78 Tree Orchard 62.59 OHW 76.52 OHW OHW 76.12 76.11 39.82 49.46 74.65 42.50 Densely Vegetated Deciduous Woodland 57.89 74.68 74.28 51.0 61.41 76.27 38.79 40.75 46.51 57.5 Tree Orchard OHW 68.00 74.74 52.33 59.36 60.36 66.0 74.99 37.49 53.42 58.54 OHW OHW 70.5 37.86 39.15 40.60 75.25 38.93 39.62 47.39 74.48 74.51 74.41 39.43 47.64 37.08 73.93 37.24 74.46 74.85 OHW 65.86 68.28 43.54 56.93 Pile of cut tree branches OHW 39.77 OHW 74.17 75.07 74.21 37.57 50.5 74.59 40.42 65.08 65.5 73.36 73.73 74.66 73.82 47.55 70.0 75.17 74.85 41.66 51.41 OHW 75.08 36.85 72.53 74.14 74.37 74.16 47.14 68.66 OHW OHW 74.33 74.80 74.91 63.83 70.17 71.01 71.68 73.67 66.25 69.22 74.61 74.00 39.69 44.33 46.88 74.82 73.31 41.54 46.95 62.76 OHW 65.0 74.34 74.07 OHW 37.08 45.23 61.71 OHW 69.5 74.14 74.74 73.59 37.83 42.68 50.0 50.53 66.87 74.58 STNK3 48.08 52.49 74.00 37.61 37.07 Z=37.504 60.61 OHW 74.16 74.33 73.41 OHW 57.85 58.64 59.56 OHW 64.5 43.64 49.69 73.95 73.65 42.46 48.50 57.09 69.0 73.83 74.20 74.34 74.40 45.88 OHW 48.84 73.64 73.89 OHW 43.39 OHW 67.03 74.07 56.67 73.44 49.5 51.60 52.84 73.72 74.12 38.65 64.0 38.76 38.90 46.63 72.94 46.85 OHW 74.00 37.58 73.57 38.32 72.53 36.99 38.09 OHW 68.5 43.21 OHW 64.48 67.31 63.43 71.77 39.71 70.28 70.97 37.13 37.53 73.87 36.79 44.29 Small Trees 63.5 69.43 37.33 52.39 OHW 67.72 68.53 73.78 OHW 73.17 OHW Multi Bole 37.67 46.36 49.0 50.73 61.30 73.59 60600N 36.69 36.89 56.93 68.0 Wire Fence 73.74 40.61 44.11 Multi Bole Post and 37.34 46.17 OHW 63.0 46.07 65.07 m High 57.18 59.95 OHW 72.67 1.2 37.31 38.82 44.90 45.29 OHW 72.14 Multi Bole 73.30 36.85 37.00 41.62 57.82 58.69 45.19 45.92 OHW 62.96 OHW 36.91 48.5 OHW 72.85 STNK1 46.48 62.5 65.53 67.5 Z=44.801 45.27 49.85 51.53 71.10 44.72 OHW 36.84 45.69 OHW 72.42 38.10 OHW 38.24 44.72 65.89 37.17 47.43 56.19 61.79 46.90 60.32 62.0 37.91 56.61 42.55 55.75 OHW 66.31 72.07 36.58 36.71 36.33 36.81 37.02 48.0 69.86 OHW 67.0 57.06 OHW 45.75 55.65 37.59 45.93 37.38 38.91 57.61 67.40 69.00 51.98 36.75 61.5 58.14 OHW 63.56 71.25 36.40 OHW OHW 67.61 36.25 36.89 Hardcore/Stone 62.57 36.86 43.37 45.55 50.52 66.61 46.45 58.67 70.43 38.14 39.80 44.21 47.5 OHW OHW OHW 66.5 61.0 61.25 64.16 64.82 69.72 35.98 36.28 47.85 59.27 60.68 62.69 44.11 65.45 Multi Bole 36.40 46.53 59.95 37.61 OHW 65.79 68.50 OHW 40.59 OHW 37.39 63.02 47.0 65.62

36.55 36.63 37.18 50.93 60.5 64.31 66.0 46.06 49.64 OHW 36.31 37.06 46.13 36.15 36.86 OHW 37.18 38.32 OHW 36.30 44.44 35.99 36.78 64.08 64.74 35.88 46.92 37.46 38.16 63.78 66.12 54.82 54.82 61.90 OHW

OHW OHW 60.0 65.23 41.50 55.15 55.55 63.20 36.15 51.67 36.04 37.44 45.21 45.84 56.45 39.13 OHW 38.04 46.5 48.82 50.02 64.03 37.62 44.82 46.16 OHW 56.87 OHW 38.96 45.05 57.42 58.22 36.56 44.74 51.17 60.72 36.79 43.36 Densely Vegetated Deciduous Woodland 59.5 61.82 36.37 42.37 OHW 59.75 62.75 OHW 59.23 35.92 36.73 OHW 38.19 45.41 35.97 38.77 40.04 43.22 61.65 38.32 47.91 37.32 39.87 OHW OHW 35.75 46.0 OHW 59.0 59.81 35.59 49.01 35.52 35.85 Small Trees 60.48 38.96 39.55 41.08 54.06 OHW 50.52 OHW 39.07 OHW 40.80 Pos 43.50 59.24 60.20 36.38 35.79 36.18 t an 54.05 36.35 1.2 d Wir 58.5 m High e Fence 41.71 54.40 OHW 36.57 OHW 45.5 54.75 OHW 39.99 40.46 51.06 41.45 55.05 Fence Hardcore/Dirt Track 38.70 40.16 46.13 55.48 e 50.56 55.88 OHW Wir OHW 44.29 OHW d 42.40 43.88 an 53.31 57.13 58.0 t 35.55 37.16 43.92 44.93 44.12 High 40.88 41.26 53.31 57.63 Pos OHW m 42.27 49.54 57.94 OHW 1.2 39.79 40.98 45.35 OHW 37.79 45.0 35.58 50.75 35.37 35.47 58.10 35.36 44.41 58.61 OHW 36.05

35.94 41.83 OHW OHW 57.5 41.67 GP 58.22 47.05 41.81 GP 40.53 OHW

38.53 OHW OHW 44.5 35.46 48.50 35.75 42.60

OHW 42.38 50.04

46.17 52.60 OHW 39.44 OHW 57.0 41.34 42.55 GP GP 36.30 53.15 OHW

53.49 OHW OHW

36.02 40.10 42.24 49.19 35.99 53.84 35.29 43.23 44.0 41.97 43.02 43.88 47.59 54.23 43.15 44.84 52.60 54.61 OHW 56.5

OHW 44.11 55.00 OHW

35.16 35.17 56.00 56.74 40.87 43.5 56.39 36.72 42.59 OHW 48.32 OHW 56.85 43.34 46.82 OHW 41.49

OHW

35.32 OHW 37.34 OHW 56.0 35.08 46.09 Tree Orchard 34.94 42.12 OHW

43.0 OHW 38.30 47.37 OHW 45.34 35.54 38.99 49.40 51.84 OHW OHW OHW 35.04 44.63 55.5

35.75 42.5 40.62 42.76 48.56 51.87 52.26 52.58 OHW OHW 49.0 52.98 OHW LEGEND 39.68 46.56 53.38 53.77 42.21 43.99 54.14 OHW 55.04 55.66 43.28 OHW 42.0 OHW 55.63 G

34.76 35.42 55.0

35.50 34.77 47.68 OHW CL:90.00 Gully Drainage OHW 51.08 OHW 36.44 45.86 48.5 48.69 OHW

OHW 35.03 41.5 OHW 34.77 37.27 40.74 45.10 46.87

OHW 54.5 37.93 44.36 OHW Small Trees OHW 60550N 39.59 MH 54.82 Manholes/Covers 34.72 41.0 41.70 43.73 51.08 OHW CL:90.00 OHW 38.58 51.39 OHW 40.92 48.0 51.64 46.09 52.05 40.5 IL:88.00 52.42 OHW 54.55 52.83 54.0 OHW 47.66 OHW 53.63 54.05 43.01 48.14 OHW RE Densely Vegetated Deciduous Woodland OHW 34.70 OHW 34.39 Rodding Eye

34.35 34.99 35.08 50.29 34.90 35.71 41.52 45.36 47.97 CL:80.61 42.07 46.81 47.5 OHW 53.5 OHW 40.0 OHW 36.44 39.69 47.76

37.07 47.57 OHW FH OHW 34.29 38.53 OHW 45.96 47.35 44.52 47.0 CL:90.00 Fire Hydrant

34.30 OHW 53.85 39.5 40.03 40.56 43.70 47.53 OHW OHW 53.0 Multi Bole 37.54 46.85 47.79 45.30 47.48 OHW

OHW 39.0 OHW SC 47.54 42.23 50.94 Water Stopcock 42.90 49.88 50.17 50.52 51.34 OHW 52.5 47.16 51.69 OHW OHW 52.14 52.56 52.95 IC 46.5 48.24 34.65 .\9675 lostwithiel41.23 golf 153.25 (JPEG).jpg 34.39 35.00 38.75 44.61 53.43

OHW Inspection Covers Log Pile TOCH:48.52 CL:90.00 49.49 OHW 47.21 OHW

33.92 47.46

33.88 35.57 47.30 47.40 40.51 47.16 GP 38.5 46.29 OHW 37.74 42.22 46.57 47.10 47.12 Multi Bole OHW 36.28 45.78 OHW 43.68 45.22 47.22 47.76 39.17 46.0 52.0 53.05 WC 39.78 49.04 Water Valve/Cover 40.35 46.51 OHW 33.84 41.26 41.84 46.87 46.89 48.65 36.81 OHW 46.72 46.87 48.21 OHW

33.86 42.85 46.84 46.86 44.58 STNK5 47.28 Z=44.814 OHW 38.0 41.75 GP WM 46.12 46.78 OHW 52.89 OHW Water Meter 43.98 46.65 46.16 52.85 46.45 46.62 46.72 51.5 45.5 OHW OHW 33.87 OHW 34.26 38.04 ER 42.01 48.70 43.11 49.40 49.82 Earth Rod 49.01 50.24 OHW OHW 34.69 37.5 OHW 51.55

33.53 51.10 34.15 51.95 33.50 34.23 41.48 46.78 47.13 52.25 STNK6 38.37 47.16 CVR 46.42 Z=50.902 45.0 OHW OHW OHW 51.0 35.46 36.87 40.66 45.43 46.05 CL:90.00 Unspecified Cover Small Trees 47.80 47.34 44.83 47.52 52.29

33.36 47.97 OHW 36.11 44.33 OHW OHW 37.0 43.83 47.20 46.59 46.84 47.12 BT 33.30 43.11 46.30 46.76 41.10 46.17 OHW BT Cover 42.35 45.74 OHW 37.32 41.79 OHW CL:46.27 44.76 45.22 46.02 50.5 39.65 45.58

44.51 OHW 41.40 44.12 44.99 OHW 40.28 43.98 44.45 OHW 43.26 51.78 GC 36.5 43.38 43.91 33.25 42.77 Gas Cover 33.40 OHW 38.81 42.49 42.83 43.33 37.66 41.10 OHW 33.95 42.22 OHW 41.97 42.74 32.87 50.0 33.05 33.05 39.45 33.74 33.83 38.15 OHW 34.59 PO 41.46 41.92 46.68 47.03 47.56 41.13 OHW 36.14 41.41 48.35 OHW 41.08 47.94 48.73 50.93 51.47 OHW 40.76 49.63 50.03 50.47 Overhead Wires 32.91 OHW

36.0 46.15 OHW OHW 35.31 38.47 46.37 32.97 Pos TP 1.2 36.69 OHW 49.5 Telegraph Pole OHW 39.95 OHW

m t 50.95 an 32.64 35.80 EP 50.91 High

d 37.76 OHW EP 32.72 OHW Wir 33.25 OHW Electricity Pole 32.61 35.5 36.28 38.99 e STNK4 OHW Fence Z=35.080

OHW OHW 49.0 LP Lamppost

32.33 33.62 OHW 32.46 38.23 OHW 37.28 OHW 32.49 33.17 33.15 35.0 SP Multi Bole Signpost

32.49 OHW

OHW 32.33 37.57 OHW 32.25 45.44 46.24 34.33 48.5 36.45 Post 32.12 46.60 47.02 OHW Post 32.26 OHW 49.68 45.66 47.28 OHW 49.25 49.96 34.5 37.04 48.09 48.48 34.84 Multi Bole 32.43 OHW

36.03 OHW OHW SVP 32.27 Soil Vent Pipe 35.33 50.04 32.05 32.17 48.0 32.54 36.25 46.30 OHW OHW 31.87 OHW 32.03 34.0 DP 32.66 36.06 Drainpipe 46.87 31.93 OHW 32.53 33.5 32.60 45.35 60500N OHW 32.28 46.23 OHW Mkr 46.26 32.04 Fence OHW Marker Post 31.92 e 45.49 46.34 47.5 32.44 Wir 46.36 OHW OHW 31.78 33.33 d 32.76 45.54 31.80 32.21 t an OHW 35.16 High 46.52 OHW Pos OHW Gate 32.02 32.62 33.24 2m 46.00 46.11 46.40 48.17 31.67 33.03 33.82 OHW 46.72 47.81 48.50 49.04 34.30 45.55 OHW 47.48 OHW 33.50 49.20 32.39 47.0 47.11 GP 33.17 34.76 44.62 Gate Post 44.88 45.65 49.00 OHW

31.74 OHW OHW 33.55 90.00 32.79 34.82 Soil Mounds 33.27 45.39

OHW Ground Level 31.93 31.98 45.10 32.31 OHW OHW 31.77 31.92 33.49 44.68 31.32 33.23 33.65 Multi Bole OHW 46.5 Tree Orchard 31.53 32.61 OHW OHW IL:90.00 31.75 32.94 Invert Level 31.83 32.00 33.83 44.77 OHW 33.41 44.64 45.14 OHW OHW 31.78 33.0 45.18 TOW:90.00 31.46 33.15 44.27 31.47 32.53 44.43 OHW 46.0 Top of Wall Level 33.29 OHW 31.83 32.59 OHW 33.75 44.58

33.00 45.27 26.46 32.69 OHW 45.85 46.26 46.63 OHW OHW 47.21 47.55 TOF:90.00 31.08 31.74 43.83 33.16 33.19 31.17 26.58 Top of Fence Level 26.47 32.36 OHW 26.59 26.43 32.00 32.45 31.65 44.65 47.91 31.33 44.00 OHW OHW

31.46

Pos 32.5 2 32.69 m TOC:90.00 OHW

t 45.5 High OHW OHW 31.64 32.86 47.74 Top of Concrete Level an 32.07 32.16 32.11 31.58 32.30 d OHW Wir

31.44 32.95 44.22 OHW OHW FFL:90.00

30.73 e Finished Floor Level 31.48 Fence 43.81 Dense Vegetation 44.28 OHW 32.70 44.60 OHW OHW 31.73 32.0 Roof Lvl:90.00 30.63 30.64 45.0 31.95 32.26 43.78 OHW Roof Level 32.51 OHW OHW 31.89

30.81 31.69 45.96 25.97 30.67 30.59 31.78 45.50 44.46 44.76 45.00 46.24 26.0 30.22 31.27 44.80 46.52 46.71 30.64 31.64 Soil Mounds OHW RG:90.00 43.02 OHW OHW 26.07 Ridge Level 25.98 44.15 t Bridge 31.91 26.13 25.92 30.45 43.58 Foo 31.5 30.05 32.11 d 30.35 30.89 OHW 31.66 31.65 43.83 OHW OHW 44.5 Eave:90.00 26.96 Overhea Eaves Level 30.73 31.49 32.00 31.08 OHW

31.13 32.24 31.25 43.05 43.69 OHW OHW 42.69

43.42 46.56

Ston SOF:30.81 Fence 31.0 31.38 31.71

e 26.97 OHW

27.05 25.73 25.68 OHW OHW e 32.04

Wir 25.62 31.49 Existing Building SOF:30.82 Wall 31.39 d 31.01 44.0 OHW 25.74 High 31.08 an 31.76 27.00 OHW OHW t 30.50

m 30.71

25.64 42.74 Multi Bole 46.31 30.5 30.88

29.45 Pos 1.2

OHW Multi Bole 30.43 30.99 31.20 OHW OHW 26.91 30.60 25.53 Building Canopy 25.5 29.87 31.17 25.55 31.13 30.76 30.30 30.51 31.78 Stone Wall 28.60 30.08 31.03 42.92 OHW 43.34 43.67 OHW OHW Pos 44.29 1.2 31.69 43.5 43.82 44.76 45.05 45.35 45.51 25.57 27.93 30.77 31.06 30.50 25.57 30.90 m 28.19 30.96 t OHW 30.0 an

High Top of Kerb 26.59 25.37 28.38 28.97 29.35 30.83 OHW OHW 45.51 d

EP 25.81 29.45 30.20 31.28 Wir

29.71 30.14 OHW 26.0 25.35 26.5 26.56 26.50 e DK 29.35 OHW OHW 29.58 29.90 30.00 41.96 EP 43.0 Fence Drop Kerb GP 27.49 30.02 OHW 26.74 28.02 29.5 25.57 GP 42.19

OHW

27.0 29.73

OHW 25.18 25.40 Hera 28.49 28.85 s Fence 27.5 OHW OHW OHW OHW 2m High 29.21

OHW 26.06 26.49 28.02 Channel Hardcore/Dirt Track OHW 25.18 28.75 OHW 29.0 OHW OHW OHW 27.10 28.5 29.56 25.51 25.02 29.73 25.81 Soil and Rocks 28.0 42.5 OHW 27.12 27.89 GP 30.47 GP 44.93 OHW 30.49 OHW OHW 29.19 25.29 24.81 OHW 27.04 30.39 OHW 25.0 25.09 27.26 27.34 44.77 Tarmac Edge OHW 25.55 28.89 Fence 24.89 27.36 24.5 27.60 30.34 e OHW 27.29 OHW 28.08 28.41 28.15 28.43 29.37 Wir PO 30.08 d OHW 25.24 26.72 42.0 43.47 24.43 OHW 44.70 an OHW OHW Stone Wall t 42.11 42.76 25.01 29.85 29.12 42.46 43.91 OHW 26.37 GP Pos High OHW 29.04 29.56 44.22 24.45 24.97 27.81 28.73 2m 41.50 Concrete Edge 28.48 OHW 24.12 OHW 28.09 OHW 28.52 OHW 24.93 OHW OHW 27.66 GP

24.45 OHW 24.54 26.07 OHW

24.0 OHW OHW Footpath Edge Multi Bole OHW OHW 23.5 23.46 OHW 41.18 41.5 OHW OHW 60450N 24.40 OHW

OHW OHW

23.51 OHW 44.0 OHW Wall Retaining Top OHW EP

OHW 23.79 41.27 43.88 23.52 OHW 24.01 OHW 40.54 41.0 43.59 OHW 41.53 41.66 Wall Line OHW 40.78 43.23 OHW 42.31 43.5 40.86 42.82 OHW

OHW OHW 40.92 41.10 Fence OHW

OHW OHW 40.5 41.70 43.13 OHW 40.56 OHW 40.56 43.0 OHW Railings

OHW 40.79

OHW OHW 41.30 42.77 OHW 40.47 OHW Steps OHW Soil Mounds OHW 40.0 42.5 OHW OHW 40.43

OHW 40.38 OHW Hedge/Earth & Stone Wall OHW 40.10 OHW 39.85 OHW 39.52 41.93 OHW 40.63 39.76 40.30 42.0 Top of Bank OHW OHW 40.21 OHW 39.74

OHW OHW 39.97 OHW 42.03 Embankment

OHW OHW 41.77

41.70 OHW 41.5 Bottom of Bank

OHW OHW

OHW

OHW OHW Grass Edge OHW

OHW OHW 41.0 OHW 39.17

38.67 OHW 38.93 40.92 Edge of Tree Canopy OHW 40.60 OHW 39.29 39.35 40.12 OHW 39.62 40.5 OHW 38.89 OHW Tree Drawn To Size OHW

OHW 40.34 40.54 OHW 38.69 40.0

38.43 40.25 OHW 38.45 OHW

OHW Hedge OHW

OHW 38.30 39.5 OHW 39.41 39.54

38.56 38.76 Shrub 38.41 39.18 38.15

37.91 37.80 39.0 39.05 Edge of Vegetation/Shrubs

39.12

38.05 37.80 37.46 38.71 STN1 38.15 Control Station 37.43 38.20 Z=90.00 38.01 38.5 38.59 38.18 37.44 37.95 37.77 Multi Bole 37.85 37.19 Soil Mounds 37.87

37.81

Pos 37.63 2 37.37 m 38.0 37.82 36.88 t 38.16 High an 37.15 37.42 37.64 d 37.64 37.92 Wir 37.40

e 37.05 38.17 37.56

Fence 60400N 37.19 37.17 37.5 37.66 37.24 37.40 37.15 36.77 37.70

36.20 36.89 37.16 37.0 OHW

37.49 36.53 36.69 36.76 OHW 36.64 36.92 36.46 Notes 36.85 OHW

35.96 36.49 OHW

OHW 36.5 35.95 OHW 35.92 35.51 OHW Levels are in metres above Ordnance Survey Datum, OHW

34.66 35.84 OHW 36.0 35.96 35.39

Multi Bole 35.86 OHW 34.95 35.68 Newlyn.

OHW 34.98 OHW 35.5 OHW

OHW

34.92 OHW 35.13 35.09 34.41 33.43 Coordinate system is Ordnance Survey National Grid 34.26 35.0 34.61 OHW 34.09

OHW

OHW OSGB36(15) at coordinates 211029.7841E, 34.5 TP OHW 33.28 OHW 60732.0859N (STNK2). All data has been drawn using 34.0 OHW 32.89

OHW 33.64 33.59 33.25 32.96 33.5 OHW a scale factor of 1.0000 from this point. 32.10 Fence e OHW 32.53 Wir 32.46 d 33.0 OHW an t High m OHW Pos 1.3

32.5 OHW 32.03 32.17 32.38 31.78 OHW No allowance has been made for sub surface entry into 32.01 31.81 32.0 OHW

OHW 30.79 31.45 manholes or other chambers or voids below ground 31.5 OHW 30.79 31.00

OHW 30.96 31.0 OHW level. Therefore any details relating to depths, sizes

OHW 30.74 30.79

29.98

OHW 30.29 30.5 etc. are taken from above ground and as such will be OHW 30.19 30.06 OHW TP 29.48 30.0 approximate only. 29.76 29.67 29.5

29.22

29.37 29.28 It is important to note that the same accuracies implied 60350N by the plotting scale are equally applicable to digital data supplied for CAD.

Every effort has been made to identify all visable above ground features, however it should be borne in mind that there may be items obscured at the time of survey.

Visible features in the vicinity of the boundaries, as shown on this survey, may not represent the extent of

210950E 211000E 211050E 211100E 211150E 211200E 211250E 211300E 211350E 211400E 211450E 211500E 211550E legally conveyed ownership.

Tree sizes are approximate only. Trees shown are symbols indicating an approximate canopy fit.

Unless otherwise stated, Trees shown have not been identified by an Arboriculturist and therefore have been assigned their "family" name rather than their "individual" name. It must be noted that only those trees that fall within the site limits have been surveyed unless otherwise specified. KEMP ENGINEERING & SURVEYING Client Project Title Drawing Detail Rev. Date Description Surveyed by RD Date 16/10/2020 A 28/10/20 Original NO 28/10/2020 Engineering Surveys Measured Building Surveys Checked by Date Land Surveys Tel (01209) 214687 Utility Tracing Heligan Gardens Ltd Gillyflower, Lostwithiel Golf Course Topographic 2D Drawing Scale 1:666 @A0 Setting Out Full site area with imagery Fax (01209) 215189 G.P.S Lostwithiel, PL22 0HQ for reference Drawing No Revision Site Engineering [email protected] Earthworks Measurement 20-9675-007 A Datum House, 8 Barncoose Industrial Estate, Redruth, Cornwall, TR15 3RQ. Chartered Land & Engineering Surveyors

c This Drawing Is Copyright of KEMP Chartered Land & Engineering Surveyors.

Surrounding the site, the remaining golf course lies to the west and the wider agricultural landscape of fields and woodlands surrounds to the north and east. The town of Lostwithiel is situated to the south west and Restormel Manor, Farm and Castle to the north west.

Looking due west from the centre- east boundary

20.70 | Gillyflower Farm | Heritage Impact Assessment | Rev A Looking west from south east boundary

Above: Looking south towards Lostwithiel Below: From north west corner, looking due south

20.70 | Gillyflower Farm | Heritage Impact Assessment | Rev A 4.0 IDENTIFICATION OF THE NEARBY HERITAGE ASSETS

The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) identifies Designated Heritage Assets as“A World Heritage Site, Scheduled Monument, Listed Building, Protected Wreck Site, Registered Park and Garden, Registered Battlefield or Conservation Area designated under the relevant legislation.”

The heritage assets identified as having potential to be affected by development on the are shown on the plan below, taken from the Cornwall interactive mapping website.

In addition it the designated assets marked, there is an undesignated point marker in the centre of the site and the whole area Is covered by an undesignated Civil War Battlefield polygon; this marked the area that was considered in the collection of data for the formal designation of the Registered Battleground site, parked in purple.

Scheduled Monument (Restormel Castle, red hatch)

Lanhydrock Registered Park and Garden (Red)

Grade II Listed Buildings (Restormel Manor and Restormel Farm, Orange)

Battle of Lostwithiel Registered Battleground

Scheduled Monument (Purple areas) (Roman Fortlet, red hatch)

The Site

Whilst all of these designated heritage assets are close by on plan, some will not, through topography or intervening features, be impacted, however the assessment of their settings is carried out in section 6 below.

The following section shows the inter visibility between the site and Restormel Castle from both directions, for reference.

20.70 | Gillyflower Farm | Heritage Impact Assessment | Rev A 5.0 VISUAL ASSESSMENT

The photographs on the next pages show the visual relationship between different areas of the site and Restormel Castle, and looking back from the castle towards the site, in order to quantify where there may be inter visibility between the proposed development and the heritage assets identified above.

Photos 1 - 3, from within the site towards the Castle

2 1 3

20.70 | Gillyflower Farm | Heritage Impact Assessment | Rev A Photos 1 - 3 Within the site looking north west

1. From the top of the site, the tree belt screens views of the Castle.

2. From the central tree belt there is a view of the Castle

3. From lower down on the site, by the Potager, there is a view of the Castle

20.70 | Gillyflower Farm | Heritage Impact Assessment | Rev A Photos 4 & 5.

These are from the vicinity of the Castle looking towards the site.

The Castle is closed until 21 March 2021 and so access onto the ramparts was not possible for the production of this report. Permission from the Duchy was sought and granted for access into the field just below the Castle, shown in red, from where these photographs were taken.

Special access to the Castle has been arranged for January 2021 and so an update of this section will be provided at this time.

Photo 4

Field north of proposal site

Golf course fairway

Central retained copse

Tree line denoting west of site, boundary with Cott Lane

20.70 | Gillyflower Farm | Heritage Impact Assessment | Rev A Photo 5

Field north of proposals site

Golf course fairway

Central retained copse

These photographs provide a general overview of the context of the Site within the wider landscape and the inter-visibility between it and the identified heritage assets.

Restormel Castle is on the opposite side of the valley and there are points of inter-visibility from both locations, as seen in the photographs above.

The primary views from the Castle would gained from the ramparts and top of the motte and whilst these were not possible to assess in this document, it is assumed that these locations would provide an increased visibility of the site than was gained from locations 4 and 5 above; these views shall be included in the addendum update in January.

From these lower points, the site is seen as part of the general landscape, with the formal greens of the golf course being visible in its foreground.

From the site, the castle is a distinct historic point of interest in the landscape.

The next section considers all the nearby heritage assets, including their settings.

20.70 | Gillyflower Farm | Heritage Impact Assessment | Rev A 6.0 ASSESSMENT OF THE SETTING OF IDENTIFIED ASSETS

The significance of any heritage asset, as defined in the NPPF, lies in its heritage value, derived from its archaeological potential, its aesthetic and architectural merits and its historic interest; these are the values that elevate it from being merely interesting to being worthy of formal designation.

Whilst not a heritage value in its own right, the setting of an asset can contribute to its significance. Setting is defined in the NPPF as“The surroundings in which a heritage asset is experienced. Its extent is not fixed and may change as the asset and its surroundings evolve. Elements of a setting may make a positive or negative contribution to the significance of an asset, may affect the ability to appreciate that significance or may be neutral.”

The Planning Practice Guidance Notes that accompany the NPPF expand on this definition, stating:“The extent and importance of setting is often expressed by reference to visual considerations. Although views of or from an asset will play an important part, the way in which we experience an asset in its setting is also influenced by other environmental factors such as noise, dust and vibration from other land uses in the vicinity, and by our understanding of the historic relationship between places. For example, buildings that are in close proximity but are not visible from each other may have a historic or aesthetic connection that amplifies the experience of the significance of each.”.

The designated heritage assets that have been identified in section 4 as within the vicinity of the site are:

• RestormelCastle(SM) • RomanFortlet(SM) • RestormelManor(LB,GdII) • Restormelfarm(LB,GdII) • LanhydrockRegisteredParkandGarden(RPG) • BattleofLostwithielBattleground(RB).

None are directly affected, so this assessment will look at their setting and the contribution that this makes to their overall significance.

The assessment of the setting of these assets is carried out in accordance with the Historic England Good Practice in Planning Note 3 “The Setting of Heritage Assets”. This document suggests a staged approach to proportionate decision taking, including:

Step 1: Identify which heritage assets and their settings are affected

Step 2: Assess the degree to which these settings and views make a contribution to the significance of the heritage asset(s) or allow significance to be appreciated

Step 3: Assess the effects of the proposed development, whether beneficial or harmful, on the significance or on the ability to appreciate it

Step 4: Explore ways to maximise enhancement and avoid or minimise harm

Step 5: Make and document the decision and monitor outcomes

Steps 1 to 4 are followed in this document, step 5 is the responsibility of the Local Planning Authority.

As noted in the above document:

The extent and importance of setting is often expressed by reference to visual considerations. Although views of or from an asset will play an important part, the way in which we experience an asset in its setting is also influenced by other environmental factors such as noise, dust and vibration from other land uses in the vicinity, and by our understanding of the historic relationship between places. For example, buildings that are in close proximity but are not visible from each other may have a historic or aesthetic connection that amplifies the experience of the significance of each.

Consideration has been given in relation to this description for all the assets noted above, although the Lanhydrock RPG is assessed as part of the setting of Restormel Castle.

20.70 | Gillyflower Farm | Heritage Impact Assessment | Rev A Restormel Castle (Scheduled Monument) including the Lanhydrock Registered Park and Garden.

Statement of Significance The place name is derived from the Cornish“Ros tor moyl”, meaning ‘bare hilltop spur’. It is a motte and bailey type of castle which are medieval fortifications introduced into Britain by the Normans. They comprised a large conical mound of earth or rubble (the motte), surmounted by a palisade and a stone or timber tower. In a majority of examples an embanked enclosure containing additional buildings (the bailey), adjoined the motte. Motte castles and motte-and-bailey castles acted as garrison forts during offensive military operations, as strongholds, and, in many cases, as aristocratic residences and the centre of local or royal administration.

Restormel castle includes a motte, built c.1100 and extensively remodelled during construction of the shell keep, dating to c.1200.

The motte is a circular mound around 52m diameter at its base, rising 6m from the base of the surrounding flat-bottomed ditch.

The earliest structure on the motte is the lower part of the stone gate-tower on the west side, considered to be contemporary with the initial construction of the motte. The circular shell keep type castle and rectangular bailey date from c.1200. The shell keep comprises a curtain wall 38m diameter, 2.4m thick, butted against the earlier gate tower, and surviving to the full height of the wall walk 7.6m above the courtyard at ground level; the battlemented parapet is also extensively intact.

The visible internal structures of the keep date to later in the 13th century. The keep contains an inner courtyard bounded by a circular wall concentric with the curtain wall; the castle's domestic buildings were formed by the division of the space between the courtyard and the curtain walls. These domestic buildings have been identified as including: guardhouses to each side of the gate tower; the kitchen; the great hall; the solar; the ante-chamber; the bed- chamber and the guest chamber.

The chapel is also a 13th century addition projecting beyond the curtain wall on the NE side. It has a blocked window and related alterations considered to be the site of a Civil War gun emplacement.

The castle’s history from the mid 13th century onwards is understood. It was briefly owned by the King’s brother-in-law Simon de Montfort during 1265, prior to his death in battle later that year.

20.70 | Gillyflower Farm | Heritage Impact Assessment | Rev A In 1268 the Cardinhams’ heiress, Isolda de Tracy, granted to Richard, Earl of Cornwall and King of the Romans, the town of Lostwithiel and the castle of Restormel. Earl Richard died in 1272, only four years after acquiring Restormel, so it seems more probable that it was his son Edmund who built the present castle. Edmund’s work at Trematon Castle is documented and provides a parallel.

Earl Edmund died without an heir in 1300. The Earldom of Cornwall then became vacant until Edward II elevated Piers Gaveston to the title in 1307. Gaveston was executed by the king’s opponents in 1312, but slightly later documents suggest that he had allowed the castles of Cornwall to fall into disrepair.

In March 1337 Edward III made his son Edward, later known as the Black Prince, Duke of Cornwall, and endowed him with a huge estate. This included the properties formerly belonging to the Earldom of Cornwall.

A comprehensive survey of this estate was made in summer 1337. This documents the prince’s acquisition of his new properties and provides the most detailed description of Restormel Castle in its history.

It records an inner ward or enclosure (which survives today) containing a hall and three chambers over cellars, a chapel, and a stable for six horses, the last perhaps in the courtyard. It also describes a larger outer enclosure (now lost) with a great hall and a further three chambers, all above cellars, together with a chapel, service buildings, and stabling for 20 horses. A lead conduit supplied water to the castle. Many of the buildings were already decaying at this time.

The Black Prince stayed at the castle in August–September 1354 and again in the winter of 1362–3, when he celebrated Christmas there. These are the only known occasions on which a member of the royal family resided at the castle.

Restormel Castle was sporadically repaired under Richard II in the later 14th century, and in the mid 15th century under Henry VI and Edward IV. However this was followed by a period of decline and by the 1540’s, only its inner ward was habitable. At some point before 1542 Henry VIII converted the royal park at Restormel to open countryside, reportedly transferring the property to Sir Richard Pollard, one of his officials.

In 1584 the cartographer John Norden described a scene of desolation. In the outer ward, only the remains of a huge oven could be detected, while plundering of the inner ward’s buildings for lead, stone and timber had begun.

During the Civil War the castle was briefly garrisoned for the last time. In summer 1644 a Parliamentarian army under Lord Essex took it over. It seems likely that only part of the derelict castle was pressed into service as a gun emplacement – probably the chapel which overlooks the valley, and perhaps the gatehouse.

This was the last time Restormel functioned as a castle; after this it was to become known as a historical curiosity and a feature in the landscape. From the 1620s onwards Restormel Manor (known as Trinity House until 1774, being on the site of the medieval hermitage of the Trinity) was leased and remodelled.

The manor’s 18th-century occupants added a plantation of trees across the castle’s former outer enclosure, framing the ivy-clad ruins in a ‘picturesque’ fashion. The castle itself became something of a tourist attraction, visited by, among others, Queen Victoria and Prince Albert, in 1846.

By 1920, however, the condition of its stonework was giving cause for concern, after years of apparent neglect and uncontrolled vegetation. The Office of Works negotiated with the Duchy of Cornwall over repairs, and finally agreed to take the ruins and the site of the outer ward into state guardianship. The transfer took place on 6 March 1925.

The ruins were cleared of vegetation and rubble, and the masonry conserved or, in parts, reconstructed. The castle was prepared for public viewing by the addition of timber stairs and balustrades, and by the felling of an avenue of conifers in 1941. Since 1984, the site has been managed by English Heritage.

Restormel Castle was designated a scheduled monument in October 1982 and, as noted on the Scheduling description:

Restormel Castle is a particularly well-preserved motte and bailey castle with one of the most intact of all known shell keeps, complete with its near-contemporary internal structures surviving to most of their wall height. It has great historical importance as one of the four major castles of the Earls of Cornwall and was their principle residence in the later 13th century.

The castle is still a clear and well-visited landmark in the local landscape and retains considerable potential for future contributions to the study of this important class of monument.

20.70 | Gillyflower Farm | Heritage Impact Assessment | Rev A Its significance is therefore considered to be of the highest value, architecturally, archaeologically and historically.

Assessment of setting and its contribution to the overall significance. The setting of the castle has changed significantly since the landscaped tree planting across its former outer enclosure by the former occupiers of Restormel Manor in the C18th.

However, notwithstanding this intervention, the castle was, by its definition and nature, designed to be on high ground, visible from far and wide, proclaiming its importance firstly as a aristocratic residence and later as a garrison for military operations.

Its position on the summit of a spur projecting into the Fowey valley, and the inclusion of the motte on top of this spur, means that it is visible from long distances, particularly from the south and east; from the north and west the woodland planting has screened most views.

The RPG of Lanhydrock includes the Castle at its southernmost point, however it is primarily focussed around Lanhydrock House, its gardens, pleasure grounds and parkland to the north west.

Whilst the castle is within the RPG, the RPG at this point does not contribute more to the setting of the castle than being part of the general wider landscape; it mostly incorporates the woodland area that surrounds the castle and Restormel Manor to the north.

Other than these and other maturing woodlands that have altered the perspective of prominence from certain directions and the evolving agricultural landscape, the setting has not changed much in the 900 years since its construction

The setting is hugely important to understanding the location, construction, history and prominence of the castle and contributes greatly to its significance.

Contribution of the Site to the setting. The site is within the wider landscape to the south east. It was formerly part of the Lostwithiel Golf Course and so its features have been previously sculpted by man; these features are still apparent on the ground, however in long range views (photos 4 & 5 in the previous section) the gold course is more apparent below Cott Lane, with intervening woodland and tree lines screening much of the site.

There are points from within the site where there are clear views of the castle and these experiences contribute to the wider setting (photos 2 & 3).

The site is just a small part of the wider landscape setting of the castle. Therefore, whilst it forms part of the land that contributes greatly to the overall setting, it is not a key element of this landscape.

The contribution of the site to the setting is therefore important, but minimal; the photo below shows a wider view from point (5), with the central retained copse shown for reference.

20.70 | Gillyflower Farm | Heritage Impact Assessment | Rev A Central retained copse

To conclude, the significance of Restormel Castle is very high, the contribution that the setting makes to this significance is very high and the contribution of the site to the setting is high as part of the wider landscape, but minimal.

Roman Fortlet (Scheduled Monument)

Statement of Significance. The scheduling states that the monument includes a Roman fortlet, situated on the summit of a prominent spur, overlooking the steep valley of the River Fowey. It notes that geophysical surveys conducted by the Cornwall Archaeological Society confirmed its identity as a Roman fortlet which was probably occupying the site of an earlier Iron Age round or hill fort. The fortlet continued in use from the 1st to 4th centuries AD and was linked to a second fort or fortlet at nearby Nanstallon. The fortlet at Restormel was of sufficient size to hold two centuries whilst Nanstallon held between two and three and probably contained the main buildings. Together they controlled established trade links through Cornwall.

The significance of the fortlet is therefore principally found in its archaeological remains and potential and its historic importance in the Roman trading links through Cornwall and it is considered to be of very high significance.

Assessment of setting and its contribution to the overall significance. Whilst the site is archaeologically and historically very important, there is little above-ground evidence of its presence and its location is viewed as part of the wider landscape.

The land around the location of the fortlet has changed over the centuries, from what would probably have been a prominent escarpment to a man-made woodland and agricultural landscape. However, the topography is important to the understanding of why it was located in this position.

The setting therefore makes a medium contribution to the overall significance of the asset.

Contribution of the Site to the setting. The site is within the wider landscape to the east. It was formerly part of the Lostwithiel Golf Course and so its features have been previously sculpted by man.

The woodland planted by the Restormel Estate in the C18th screens most views, however the field in which the monument sits is just visible from the site, as seen below. The contribution of the site to the setting is therefore considered to be neutral.

To conclude, the significance of the remains of the Roman fortlet is very high, the contribution that the setting makes to this significance is medium and the contribution of the site to the setting is neutral.

20.70 | Gillyflower Farm | Heritage Impact Assessment | Rev A Location of the Roman Fortlet, as seen from the eastern part of the site

Restormel Manor and Restormel Farm (Listed Building, Grade II)

Statement of Significance. The list description for the Manor statesFarmhouse. Mid-late C17, with later stair tower, remodelled internally in early C18, with stair of mid C18; late C18 re-fronting, with C19 additions to rear left and right. Slatestone rubble, rendered with granite dressings, slate-hung porch. Slate roofs, hipped over end 2 bays to left and right, with brick ridge stacks. The description for the barns notesFarmhouse with attached stables and barn. The barn is of early-mid C18, with stable range attached to rear, probably of late C18/early C19, with farmhouse, formerly pair of cottages, of late C19 at rear end. Some later alterations. The barn is in brick, with slatestone rubble rear wall, with granite dressings; hipped slate roof with ridge coping tiles. The stables are in slatestone rubble with brick dressings, slate and corrugated asbestos roofs, partly rendered. The farmhouse is in slatestone rubble with brick dressings and concrete tiled roof with brick stacks.

Both assets are now owned by The Duchy of Cornwall and have been carefully restored and are maintained as holiday lets alongside the working farm. The significance of the group lies in their architectural interest as a C17th estate and historic links with Restormel Castle; the significance of the group if considered to be high.

Assessment of setting and its contribution to the overall significance. The Manor and Farm are positioned in the wide River Fowey valley to the north of Lostwithiel. The secluded setting includes the fertile valley floor and the C18th woodlands that rise up the valley sides. The Duchy of Cornwall Nurseries are located to the east and the main railway line runs through the site from north to south.

The setting is a combination of historic estate landscaping and modern agriculture and contributes greatly to the significance of the group.

Contribution of the Site to the setting. The site is located to the south, and whilst the lower section of the golf course would be glimpsed through the trees and over the river, intervening topography and woodlands means that there are no views or experience of the site, or of the Manor from the site. However, the approach to Restormel Manor and Farm along the valley floor allows glimpse views across the valley towards the site, where is is seen as part of the wider landscape. The site is therefore considered to contribute negligibly to the setting of the Manor and Farm.

To conclude, the significance of Restormel Manor and the Farm is high, the contribution that the setting makes to this significance is high and the contribution of the site to the setting is negligible.

20.70 | Gillyflower Farm | Heritage Impact Assessment | Rev A Battle of Lostwithiel Battleground (Registered Battleground).

Statement of Significance. The Civil Wars of the mid-C17 were a reflection of profound political, constitutional, religious and social conflict which were expressed in a struggle for control between King Charles I and Parliament. The warfare that took place in the mid-C17 is still popularly known as the English Civil War, although in fact the various actions which took place occurred in Scotland, Wales, Ireland and England.

The first military action was in the Bishops' Wars, between Scotland and England in 1638 - 1640, culminating in the Battle of Newburn, Northumberland. This was followed by the Catholic Irish rebellion. Finally England fell into open warfare with the King raising his standard in Nottingham on 22 August 1642, beginning the most intensive period of warfare in English history.

By 1644 the Civil War had been raging on for over a year and neither side was able to claim a victory. In March 1644, the Parliamentarians, under Sir William Waller, had defeated the Royalist army at Cheriton south of their base in Oxford. Although not present at Cheriton, Parliament’s commanding general was the Earl of Essex. After their victory at Cheriton, Essex decided to divide his forces. He headed towards the Royalists in the south west, while the rest, headed by Waller, were left to pursue a Royalist force which had left Oxford with the King when Essex threatened to besiege the city. This division would prove to be ill-conceived as, at the Battle of Cropredy Bridge (1644), the Royalists fought off their pursuers. Following this victory, the Oxford forces chased after Essex. This ended with the Campaign of Lostwithiel which occurred when Essex secured a hold over the Lostwithiel and other points along the Fowey River in order to establish a connection with the Navy for resupply and support.

The land over which the battle of 21 August 1644 was fought is registered for primarily for its historical importance, its topographical integrity and its archaeological potential. It was the one of the two key actions in the Lostwithiel campaign, which culminated in the worst defeat suffered by a Parliamentarian army during the war and the Royalists’ greatest success.

While the land management has changed over the years, the battlefield area remains largely undeveloped and permits the course of the battles to be appreciated and given the nature of the battle and the lack of major development, the land has the potential to provide significant insights into the nature of hedge fighting in the C17. The battlefield also has group value with Restormel Castle and other designated assets associated with the Civil War.

Assessment of setting and its contribution to the overall significance. The battlefield itself is vast, covering an area of around 3km² (300 Ha) Its setting is accordingly vast, taking in a much of the surrounding countryside. The setting has not been extensively surveyed but is considered to be important to assist with the understanding of the battle as seen from various points within the landscape and will contribute positively to the significance of the asset.

Contribution of the Site to the setting. The site is located to the south of part of the overall battlefield, as seen below.

20.70 | Gillyflower Farm | Heritage Impact Assessment | Rev A The land that makes up the most of the Registered site is comprised mostly of agricultural fields. The site and the land to the north was, until recently, a man made golf course but since the purchase of the site, the man-made features and greens have been removed and the extensive orchards have been planted, thereby providing a more natural setting for this asset. The contribution of the site to the setting is important as part of the wider landscape, but minimal given to size of the asset and even greater size of its setting.

To conclude, the significance of the Registered Battlefield is very high, the contribution that the setting makes to this significance is high and the contribution of the site to the setting is high, but minimal.

Summary Conclusions

The significance of the nearby assets, the contribution made by their settings and the contribution of the site to that significance has been assessed and summarised below:

Restormel Castle including Lanhydrock Registered Park and Garden. The significance of Restormel Castle is very high, the contribution that the setting makes to this significance is very high and the contribution of the site to the setting is high as part of the wider landscape, but minimal.

Roman Fortlet.The significance of the remains of the Roman fortlet is very high, the contribution that the setting makes to this significance is medium and the contribution of the site to the setting is neutral.

Restormel Manor and Restormel Farm. The significance of Restormel Manor and the Farm is high, the contribution that the setting makes to this significance is high and the contribution of the site to the setting is negligible.

Battle of Lostwithiel Battleground. The significance of the Registered Battlefield is very high, the contribution that the setting makes to this significance is high and the contribution of the site to the setting is high, but minimal.

These findings shall be considered further in the impact assessment in section 8.

20.70 | Gillyflower Farm | Heritage Impact Assessment | Rev A 7.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

The proposed development of the site seeks to provide a world-class facility for the research, growing, understanding and use of rare fruit and vegetable species. This will include the propagation of rare seeds to be planted out into the orchards; a 1 acre potager area based on those at the Lost Gardens of Heligan for the cultivation of rare European vegetable varieties, a main Hub that will include a cookery school, training facilities, leisure training facilities and associated operations such as a distillery and fruit storage.

The site will link not just with Eden and Heligan, but will seek partnerships with other Cornish estates and industries, such as the Duchy of Cornwall and Boconnoc in oder to create a Cornwall-wide centre of excellence for the exploration and development of agronomy and sustainable futures.

In addition, several eco-drum residential pods will be provided, linked to the facilities on the site and a single residential property will be provided as owners accommodation to the east of the site.

Parking will be provided on the existing hardcore standing at the western boundary and the potager nursery that has already been created will remain in situ.

The residential drums are elliptical and generally single storey, with a 1.5 storey option. They will be clad in vertical timber, that will be left to weather naturally and will have a green roof and aluminium and timber composite doors and windows.

The single storey drums will be a maximum of 4.1m tall and the 1.5 storey drums will be 6.24m.

They are constructed of super-insulated eco-materials to a tested design that is environmentally and ecologically sympathetic.

20.70 | Gillyflower Farm | Heritage Impact Assessment | Rev A Proposed views of the residential drums within the landscape.

The hub will be the centre of activity on the site, providing a cookery school, training facilities, research and development opportunities as well as a distillery, cider press, micro-brewery, natural fruit ripening facility, market and meeting rooms.

It will face out over the potager to provide interaction with the nursery area, providing the physical and visual link from seed to plate and glass.

The hub retains a similar elliptical shape and as the drums and will be finished in complementary materials providing a design language and consistency over the site.

It will be located in the north western most corner of the site, tucked in behind the tree line to reduce its impact on the surrounding landscape.

20.70 | Gillyflower Farm | Heritage Impact Assessment | Rev A Proposed views of the hub

20.70 | Gillyflower Farm | Heritage Impact Assessment | Rev A The owners accommodation will be located at the far north east corner of the site, dug into the land to create a low-lying structure in the same architectural and material language as used in the main development. It will be accessed from the north using an existing entry point into the site.

The house is presented as an arc facing east around a courtyard, with its back to the rest of the site so there will be minimal outlook over the orchard. Any boundaries provided shall be created naturally out of planted and landscape features.

road 85.0 drive 84.0 83.0 82.0 81.0 80.0 79.0 78.0 A 77.0

West elevation/site section C Stone Tee Marker D

83.00

82.80

82.60 road 85.0 drive 84.0 83.0 82.40 82.0 81.0 80.0 79.0 82.00 82.20 C 78.0 Courtyard site section

82.00

82.00 82.00

D 81.80

84.0 83.0

81.00 82.0 81.0 80.0 79.0 80.50 78.0 77.0 80.00

B North elevation/ site section

Dense Vegetation Dense Vegetation

Dense Vegetation 83.0 82.0 81.0 Pile of cut tree branches 80.0 PO

Collapsed Embankment

Roof /site context plan North elevation/ site section

Notes: 1. Do not scale from drawings. All dimensions to be confirmed on site prior to construction. _ _ _ 2. Roderick James Architects LLP to be notified of any discrepancies before construction continues. M 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 North 3. These drawings are the copyright property of Roderick James Architects LLP. revision date details 4. All Roderick James Architects LLP drawings to be read in conjunction with the proposed building notes, oak framing drawings and the structural engineers drawing status drawings and specification. 5. All external works shown are indicative. Design and extent is to be provided by others. Ft 0 2 4 6 8 10 20 28 6. This document should only be used for the purpose indicated by the drawing status below. Planning 7. Construction (Design & Management) Regulations 2015.The CDM 2015 regulations apply to this project. If constructed then the contractor should prepare a project drawing Gillyflower Site plan, site section Construction Phase Plan for the project. Guidance on how to compile this is available from the HSE or CITB. If there is to be more than one contractor on the 1:200 Owner's house project (including sub-contractors)a Health and Safety File should be created by the contractor at completion of the works for the client to retain. Notes: & elevations 1. Do not scaleclient from drawings. All dimensionsdrawing number to be confirmedrevision Smit DEVON - WILTSHIRE - SCOTLAND draft on site priorscale to construction.date Smit/7/PL02 1:200 Nov'2020 tel: 01803868 000 email: [email protected] www.roderickjamesarchitects.co.uk2. Roderick James Architects LLP to be notified of any discrepancies before construction continues. 3. These drawings are the copyright property of Roderick James Architects LLP. 4. All Roderick James Architects LLP drawings to be read in conjunction with the proposed building notes, oak framing drawings and the structural engineers drawings and specification. 5. All external works shown are indicative. Design and extent is to be provided by others. 6. This document should only be used for the purpose indicated by the drawing status below. 7. Construction (Design & Management) Regulations 2015.The CDM 2015 regulations apply to this project. If constructed then the contractor should prepare a Construction Phase Plan for the project. Guidance on how to compile this is available from the HSE or CITB. If there is to be more than one contractor on the project (including sub-contractors) a Health and Safety File should be created by the contractor at completion of the works for the client to retain.

West elevation

South elevation North elevation

20.70 | Gillyflower Farm | Heritage Impact Assessment | Rev A 8.0 IMPACT ASSESSMENT

The purpose of this section is to understand the effect of the proposed development, whether beneficial or harmful, on the recognised significance of the assessed heritage assets and on the ability to appreciate them, in accordance with the Historic England guidance.

The purpose of this assessment is to understand the effect of the proposed development, whether beneficial or harmful, on the recognised significance of the nearby heritage assets and on the ability to appreciate them, in accordance with the Historic England guidance.

The assessment in section 6 provided conclusions in terms of the significance, setting and contribution of the site for each of the affected assets and these are re-considered here in relation to the proposals

The primary views from the Castle, from the ramparts and top of the motte were not possible to assess in this document, and it is assumed for now that there will be an increased visibility of the site from these locations. However, the general experience of the wider landscape and the potential impact of the development is unlikely to be significantly different from these elevated points and until access to the Castle is gained in January 2021 (and any addendum issued), the overall experience shall be considered from the field below and the views in photographs 4 & 5.

Some of the drums will be visible from the Castle, however the design brief has been to create structures disposed in the landscape that will be seen as small scale interventions that will, over time, weather to become less visible and will become part of the landscape, particularly when the Gillyflower orchards start to fill out.

The main hub is a low-lying feature , screened by the mature tree line adjacent to Cott Lane and is unlikely to be visible from the Castle, likewise the owners house at the east of the site - this will not be visible (see photo 1)

Further impacts on the experience could come from the increase in activity on the site that will arise from casual visitors, longer-term visitors and employees on the farm. The parking area is screened from view and this is unlikely to present any additional impact.

However, the site was previously a golf course so there has been modern intervention in the landscape in terms of both the creation of the greens and fairways and the activity of the golfers on the site. This must be taken into account when measuring the balance of impact.

Having regard to the relevant guidance in the Planning Practice Guidance (PPG), the proposals will not affect the key elements of the building's significance, assessed to be its hugely important archaeological, architectural and historic interest, however there may be a limited impact on the setting through the location of the drums and the increased activity on the site, although this must be considered against the previous uses of the site.

The kinetic views gained from walking around the ramparts or the top of the ditch will change through the development on the site but again, this will be assessed against the previous use as a golf course.

Overall, the development has the potential to have a limited negative impact on the setting, however because of the minimal contribution of the site, the distances involved and the previous use of the site, this impact will be minor and certainly within the lower end of the less than substantial range.

There is little experience of the fortlet site from the development site, especially the western side below the central tree belt, and this is where all of the construction will take place. From the east of the site, where the owners accommodation is proposed, there will be long range views, however these will not impact on the appreciation or understanding of the significance of the asset and will not be detrimental to its setting.

The development will therefore not impact the significance or setting of the Roman Fortlet.

20.70 | Gillyflower Farm | Heritage Impact Assessment | Rev A Restormel Manor and Restormel Farm. The significance of Restormel Manor and the Farm is high, the contribution that the setting makes to this significance is high and the contribution of the site to the setting is negligible.

There is no experience of the site from Restormel Manor, or the manor from the site, however there is a kinetic experience from the access road, viewed across the river and golf course and this approach forms part of the setting of the Manor and Farm.

From this approach, the drums may be glimpsed between the trees, but the simple design and materiality of these will not disrupt views of the overall landscape. The increased activity will be comparable to the historic activity of the golf club.

As such, the development it is considered that the development will not impact the significance or setting of Restormel Manor and Farm.

The overall Battlefield site is vast and the site is not within it, but the boundaries touch at one point in the north east corner. This is the location for the owners accommodation and consideration has been given to the setting of its surroundings through the design, massing, orientation and materiality to ensure that the impact is reduced to a minimum.

The property itself will not cause any harm to the physical significance or setting of the battlefield, however it is understood that a watching brief and archaeological recording is likely to be required in this area during the construction phase.

The development to the west of the site is unlikely to be seen in close context with any part of the battlefield and as such is not considered to impact upon it; the removal of the golf course and replacement with orchards will benefit the wider landscape setting.

Summary conclusions.

The impact of the proposed development on the various heritage assets has been assessed in accordance with the Planning Practice Guidance, the NPPF and Historic England guidance and in summary, the impacts on the nearby heritage assets are considered to be:

Roman Fortlet.The development will not impact its significance or setting.

Restormel Manor and Restormel Farm. The development will not impact its significance or setting.

In accordance with the NPPF paragraph 196, because less than substantial harm has been identified to one of the assets, the proposals shall be considered in terms of their public benefits.

20.70 | Gillyflower Farm | Heritage Impact Assessment | Rev A 9.0 POLICY CONSIDERATIONS

This section relates only to Heritage policy and guidance, other policies and considerations, including the overall planning balance, are covered in the Design and Access Statement prepared by Roderick James Architects.

As noted in section 1 of this document, section 2.2 of the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979 does not cover require formal consent for development within the setting of a scheduled monument.

However policy and guidance relating to significance and setting are within the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF, February 2019 ), the associated Planning Practice Guidance (July 2019) and the Cornwall Local Plan 2010 - 2030 (November 2016)

In the NPPF, chapter 16 relates to conserving and enhancing the historic environment.

Within chapter 16, paragraph 192 outlines the aspects for LPA’s to consider when determining applications:

a) the desirability of sustaining and enhancing the significance of heritage assets and putting them to viable uses consistent with their conservation;

b) the positive contribution that conservation of heritage assets can make to sustainable communities including their economic vitality; and

c) the desirability of new development making a positive contribution to local character and distinctiveness.

Paragraph 193 states:

When considering the impact of a proposed development on the significance of a designated heritage asset, great weight should be given to the asset’s conservation (and the more important the asset, the greater the weight should be). This is irrespective of whether any potential harm amounts to substantial harm, total loss or less than substantial harm to its significance.

This assessment has concluded that the impact of the proposed development would be in the lower end of the less than substantial harm range, and as such paragraph 196 shall apply.

196. Where a development proposal will lead to less than substantial harm to the significance of a designated heritage asset, this harm should be weighed against the public benefits of the proposal including, where appropriate, securing its optimum viable use.

In the Planning Practice Guidance Notes that accompany the NPPF, the section ”What is meant by the term Public Benefits” (Paragraph: 020 Reference ID: 18a-020-20190723) provides the following definition:

Public benefits may follow from many developments and could be anything that delivers economic, social or environmental objectives as described in the NPPF. Public benefits should flow from the proposed development. They should be of a nature or scale to be of benefit to the public at large and not just be a private benefit. However, benefits do not always have to be visible or accessible to the public in order to be genuine public benefits, for example, works to a listed private dwelling which secure its future as a designated heritage asset could be a public benefit.

Examples of heritage benefits may include:

• sustaining or enhancing the significance of a heritage asset and the contribution of its setting

• reducing or removing risks to a heritage asset

• securing the optimum viable use of a heritage asset in support of its long term conservation

The public benefits that will flow directly from this development are rooted in the ethos of the proposals that seek to provide a world-class facility for the research, growing, understanding and use of rare fruit and vegetable species, linking with other like-minded estates and industries and provide a centre of excellence for the exploration and development of agronomy and sustainable futures.

As outlined above, the proposals will provide many benefits, many of which are public benefits. They include

20.70 | Gillyflower Farm | Heritage Impact Assessment | Rev A benefits that cover the full range of economic, social, and environmental objectives as outlined by the NPPF. These benefits are substantial and should therefore carry significant weight in the planning balance.

It is concluded that the significance of the benefits delivered by the proposed development, as described in this statement and the wider application submission, in combination, outweigh the less than substantial harm to the heritage asset that has been identified.

The Cornwall Local Plan policy relating to the Historic Environment is Policy 24 which states:

Development proposals will be permitted where they would sustain the cultural distinctiveness and significance of Cornwall’s historic rural, urban and coastal environment by protecting, conserving and where appropriate enhancing the significance of designated and non-designated assets and their settings.

Development proposals will be expected to:

• sustain designated heritage assets;

• take opportunities to better reveal their significance;

• maintain the special character and appearance of Conservation Areas, especially those positive elements in any Conservation Area Appraisal;

• conserve and, where appropriate, enhance the design, character, appearance and historic significance of historic parks and gardens;

• conserve and, where appropriate, enhance other historic landscapes and townscapes, including registered battlefields, including the industrial mining heritage;

• protect the historic maritime environment, including the significant ports, harbours and quays.

Development within the Cornwall and West Devon Mining Landscape World Heritage Site (WHS) and its setting should accord with the WHS Management Plan. Proposals that would result in harm to the authenticity and integrity of the Outstanding Universal Value, should be wholly exceptional. If the impact of the proposal is neutral, either on the significance or setting, then opportunities to enhance or better reveal their significance should be taken.

All development proposals should be informed by proportionate historic environment assessments and evaluations (such as heritage impact assessments, desk-based appraisals, field evaluation and historic building reports) identifying the significance of all heritage assets that would be affected by the proposals and the nature and degree of any effects and demonstrating how, in order of preference, any harm will be avoided, minimised or mitigated.

Great weight will be given to the conservation of the Cornwall’s heritage assets. Where development is proposed that would lead to substantial harm to assets of the highest significance, including undesignated archaeology of national importance, this will only be justified in wholly exceptional circumstances, and substantial harm to all other nationally designated assets will only be justified in exceptional circumstances.

Any harm to the significance of a designated or non-designated heritage asset must be justified. Proposals causing harm will be weighed against the substantial public, not private, benefits of the proposal and whether it has been demonstrated that all reasonable efforts have been made to sustain the existing use, find new uses, or mitigate the extent of the harm to the significance of the asset; and whether the works proposed are the minimum required to secure the long term use of the asset.

In those exceptional circumstances where harm to any heritage assets can be fully justified, and development would result in the partial or total loss of the asset and/or its setting, the applicant will be required to secure a programme of recording and analysis of that asset, and archaeological excavation where relevant, and ensure the publication of that record to an appropriate standard in a public archive.

Proposals that will help to secure a sustainable future for the Cornwall’s heritage assets, especially those identified as being at greatest risk of loss or decay, will be supported.

20.70 | Gillyflower Farm | Heritage Impact Assessment | Rev A This policy requires great weight to be given to the conservation of Cornwall’s heritage assets and any proposals that result in any harm, however minor should be justified, mitigated and weighed against the public benefits.

The careful consideration of the design, taking its lead from the landscape setting to provide an integrated solution to the the topography, land uses and structures, is at the heart of this development to accommodate a world-class facility that will secure and promote a sustainable future for the site, town and county.

20.70 | Gillyflower Farm | Heritage Impact Assessment | Rev A 10.0 CONCLUSIONS

The purpose of this document has been to understand the context of the site in relation to thesigni ficance of the nearby heritage assets, including thecontribution made by their setting to that significance.

It has been undertaken in accordance with NPPF and Historic England guidance to provide an assessment of the significance of the nearby heritage assets that has informed the design process and has further provided an understanding the potential impact (positive or negative) of the proposal to a level proportionate to the importance of the assets.

The proposals have been developed and designed to ensure that a world-class facility can be brought forward that willdeliver the required levels of training, research, development and partnership working whilst protecting the environment, including the setting of the nearby assets.

The assets that have the potential to be impacted by the development have been identified and their significance assessed.

The potential impact of the proposed development on the significance of these assets has then been assessed and it has been concluded that there could be be less than substantial harm on the setting of Restormel Castle. This less than substantial harm has been weighed against the social, economic and environmental public benefits of the proposal, which are substantial and, on balance, are considered to outweigh the minor impact.

The proposals have been considered in relation to national and local planning legislation, policy and guidance and have been found to accord with these. In particular, the NPPF chapter 16 (heritage conservation) and Cornwall Council Policies regarding the Historic Environment.

The Historic England document “Conservation Principles, Policies and Guidance” provides 6 Principles of Conservation by which any applications for change should be considered. These are: Principle 1: The historic environment is a shared resource Principle 2: Everyone should be able to participate in sustaining the historic environment Principle 3: Understanding the significance of places is vital Principle 4: Significant places should be managed to sustain their values Principle 5: Decisions about change must be reasonable, transparent and consistent Principle 6: Documenting and learning from decisions is essential

These principles have been considered in relation to the development and the potential impact on the setting of nearby heritage assets. This document has demonstrated that the proposals would not be contrary to them and will comply with the relevant policy and guidance.

20.70 | Gillyflower Farm | Heritage Impact Assessment | Rev A Appendix 1 - Links to Scheduling and List Descriptions for Assets referred to in this document

20.70 | Gillyflower Farm | Heritage Impact Assessment | Rev A Restormel Castle (Scheduled Monument) https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1017574

Lanhydrock (Registered Park and Garden Grade II*) https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1000449

Roman Fortlet (Scheduled Monument) https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1004660

Restormel Manor (Listed Building, Grade II) https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1137912

Restormel Farm (Listed Building, Grade II) https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1144257

Battle of Lostwithiel Battleground (Registered Battleground https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1413619

20.70 | Gillyflower Farm | Heritage Impact Assessment | Rev A www.kmetcalfeheritage.co.uk