DOCSLIB.ORG

Indigenous Self-Government Under State Recognition: Comparing Strategies in Two Cases

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Indigenous Self-Government Under State Recognition: Comparing Strategies in Two Cases Indigenous Self-Government under State Recognition: Comparing Strategies in Two Cases Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Hiraldo, Danielle Vedette Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 28/09/2021 07:25:20 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/605217 INDIGENOUS SELF-GOVERNMENT UNDER STATE RECOGNITION: COMPARING STRATEGIES IN TWO CASES by Danielle V. Hiraldo ____________________________ A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the GRADUATE INTERDISCIPLINARY PROGRAM IN AMERICAN INDIAN STUDIES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2015 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Danielle Hiraldo, titled Indigenous Self-Government under State Recognition: Comparing Strategies in Two Cases and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ______________________________________________ Date: 11/12/15 Robert Hershey _______________________________________________ Date: 11/12/15 Benedict J. Colombi _______________________________________________ Date: 11/12/15 Stephen Cornell _______________________________________________ Date: 11/12/15 K. Tsianina Lomawaima Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certify that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement. ________________________________________________ Date: 11/12/15 Dissertation Director: Robert Hershey 2 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This dissertation has been submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this dissertation are allowable without special permission, provided that an accurate acknowledgement of the source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his or her judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: Danielle V. Hiraldo 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ....................................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 8 NATIVE NATIONS AND THE EXCLUSIVE FEDERAL RELATIONSHIP .............................................. 11 FEDERALISM: THE DIVISION OF POWER AND AUTHORITY IN THE UNITED STATES ..................... 18 A WAVE OF NEW FEDERALISM .................................................................................................. 22 STATE RECOGNITION: AN EXAMPLE OF TRIBAL-STATE RELATIONSHIPS ..................................... 24 CASE STUDIES: LUMBEE AND WACCAMAW INDIAN PEOPLE ...................................................... 28 RESEARCH QUESTIONS ............................................................................................................... 33 METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................................................... 33 DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................................... 38 CHAPTER TWO: RESTRUCTURING THE GOVERNMENT-TO-GOVERNMENT RELATIONSHIP ........................................................................................................................ 40 WHO DECIDES? .......................................................................................................................... 41 THE ARGUMENT REMAINS THE SAME: FEDERAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT OPENS DOORS ............... 45 NATIVE NATION/STATE RELATIONSHIPS: DEVOLUTION OF AUTHORITY .................................... 49 CHAPTER THREE: STATE RECOGNITION ...................................................................... 53 FEDERALISM: ALTERNATIVE ARENAS FOR STATE RECOGNITION ............................................... 53 STATE RECOGNITION: A NEW PHENOMENON? ........................................................................... 58 LUMBEE RECOGNITION IN NORTH CAROLINA ............................................................................. 62 WACCAMAW INDIAN PEOPLE RECOGNITION IN SOUTH CAROLINA ............................................ 66 ISSUES FACING STATE-RECOGNIZED NATIVE NATIONS ............................................................. 70 SURVEY OF OTHER RELATIONSHIPS ........................................................................................... 75 CHAPTER FOUR: LUMBEE TRIBE OF NORTH CAROLINA ........................................ 81 WHO ARE THE LUMBEES? .......................................................................................................... 81 HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF LUMBEE INVOLVEMENT IN NORTH CAROLINA POLITICS .................. 89 “IF YOU ARE NOT AT THE TABLE, YOU ARE ON THE MENU”: GETTING THINGS DONE THROUGH LUMBEE SOCIAL AND POLITICAL ORGANIZATION .................................................................... 100 AN EXAMPLE: LUMBEES AND INDIAN CHILD WELFARE ........................................................... 109 CHAPTER FIVE: THE WACCAMAW INDIAN PEOPLE ................................................ 121 WHO ARE THE WACCAMAW? ................................................................................................... 121 THE DIMERY SETTLEMENT: HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF THE WACCAMAW INDIAN PEOPLE ...... 124 WACCAMAW SOCIAL AND POLITICAL ORGANIZATION ............................................................. 127 CONTEMPORARY POLITICAL RELATIONSHIPS IN SOUTH CAROLINA ......................................... 133 CHAPTER SIX: WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM THE LUMBEE AND WACCAMAW CASE STUDIES ........................................................................................................................ 139 EXTERNAL VARIABLES ............................................................................................................ 140 Time ..................................................................................................................................... 141 Population ........................................................................................................................... 141 Relations .............................................................................................................................. 142 LUMBEE STRATEGIES: WHAT WORKS ...................................................................................... 146 Voting ................................................................................................................................... 148 Serving as Political Actors .................................................................................................. 150 4 Engaging All Levels of Government .................................................................................... 153 Political “Friends” ............................................................................................................. 154 Pushing Political Agenda .................................................................................................... 155 Lumbee Keys to Success ...................................................................................................... 155 Lumbee Challenges .............................................................................................................. 157 WACCAMAW STRATEGIES: WHAT WORKS ............................................................................... 160 Political “Friends” ............................................................................................................. 162 Pushing Political Agenda .................................................................................................... 163 Internal Capacity ................................................................................................................. 164 Waccamaw Keys to Success ................................................................................................ 165 Waccamaw Challenges ........................................................................................................ 165 UNEXPLORED OPPORTUNITIES ................................................................................................. 167 HOW HAVE THEY SURVIVED: BY THE SEAT OF THEIR PANTS .................................................. 169 CONCLUDING REMARKS ........................................................................................................... 170 BIBLIOGRAPHY ..................................................................................................................... 173 5 LIST
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nanjemoy and Mattawoman Creek Watersheds
    Defining the Indigenous Cultural Landscape for The Nanjemoy and Mattawoman Creek Watersheds Prepared By: Scott M. Strickland Virginia R. Busby Julia A. King With Contributions From: Francis Gray • Diana Harley • Mervin Savoy • Piscataway Conoy Tribe of Maryland Mark Tayac • Piscataway Indian Nation Joan Watson • Piscataway Conoy Confederacy and Subtribes Rico Newman • Barry Wilson • Choptico Band of Piscataway Indians Hope Butler • Cedarville Band of Piscataway Indians Prepared For: The National Park Service Chesapeake Bay Annapolis, Maryland St. Mary’s College of Maryland St. Mary’s City, Maryland November 2015 ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this project was to identify and represent the Indigenous Cultural Landscape for the Nanjemoy and Mattawoman creek watersheds on the north shore of the Potomac River in Charles and Prince George’s counties, Maryland. The project was undertaken as an initiative of the National Park Service Chesapeake Bay office, which supports and manages the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail. One of the goals of the Captain John Smith Trail is to interpret Native life in the Middle Atlantic in the early years of colonization by Europeans. The Indigenous Cultural Landscape (ICL) concept, developed as an important tool for identifying Native landscapes, has been incorporated into the Smith Trail’s Comprehensive Management Plan in an effort to identify Native communities along the trail as they existed in the early17th century and as they exist today. Identifying ICLs along the Smith Trail serves land and cultural conservation, education, historic preservation, and economic development goals. Identifying ICLs empowers descendant indigenous communities to participate fully in achieving these goals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Colorblind Turn in Indian Country: Lumbee Indians, Civil Rights, and Tribal State Formation
    The Colorblind Turn in Indian Country: Lumbee Indians, Civil Rights, and Tribal State Formation by Harold Walker Elliott A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) in the University of Michigan 2019 Doctoral Committee: Professor Philip Deloria, Co-Chair, Harvard University Professor Matthew Lassiter, Co-Chair Associate Professor Matthew Countryman Professor Barbra Meek Professor Tiya Miles, Harvard University Harold Walker Elliott [email protected] ORCID iD 0000-0001-5387-3188 © Harold Walker Elliott 2019 DEDICATION To my father and mother, Hal and Lisa Elliott And for Lessie Sweatt McCloud, her ancestors, and her descendants ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation is the culmination of eight years of graduate study and nearly a decade of research, writing, and editing. The result is deeply imperfect. Its faults come from my many shortcomings as an author. For anything this project does accomplish, I owe credit to the many people who have helped me along the way. Completing this project would have been impossible without the love, support, and inspiration of my parents, Hal and Lisa Elliott. During my upbringing, they instilled the values that guided me through the moral choices that a project like this one entails. My mother and her family have always been the driving forces behind my research into Lumbee and American Indian history. My father, a reluctant physician, passed down his fondness for history and dream of writing it. In the many difficult moments over the past eight years, my parents steadied me with long hugs or reassuringly familiar, South Carolina-accented voices on the phone.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Evidence of a Croatian and Sephardic Jewish Settlement on the North Carolina Coast Dating from the Mid to Late 1500S Elizabeth C
    International Social Science Review Volume 95 | Issue 2 Article 2 DNA Evidence of a Croatian and Sephardic Jewish Settlement on the North Carolina Coast Dating from the Mid to Late 1500s Elizabeth C. Hirschman James A. Vance Jesse D. Harris Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.northgeorgia.edu/issr Part of the Anthropology Commons, Communication Commons, Genealogy Commons, Geography Commons, International and Area Studies Commons, Jewish Studies Commons, Political Science Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Hirschman, Elizabeth C.; Vance, James A.; and Harris, Jesse D. () "DNA Evidence of a Croatian and Sephardic Jewish Settlement on the North Carolina Coast Dating from the Mid to Late 1500s," International Social Science Review: Vol. 95 : Iss. 2 , Article 2. Available at: https://digitalcommons.northgeorgia.edu/issr/vol95/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Nighthawks Open Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Social Science Review by an authorized editor of Nighthawks Open Institutional Repository. DNA Evidence of a Croatian and Sephardic Jewish Settlement on the North Carolina Coast Dating from the Mid to Late 1500s Cover Page Footnote Elizabeth C. Hirschman is the Hill Richmond Gott rP ofessor of Business at The nivU ersity of Virginia's College at Wise. James A. Vance is an Associate Professor of Mathematics at The nivU ersity of Virginia's College at Wise. Jesse D. Harris is a student studying Computer Science
    [Show full text]
  • The People of the Falling Star
    Patricia Lerch. Waccamaw Legacy: Contemporary Indians Fight for Survival. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2004. xvi + 168 pp. $57.50, cloth, ISBN 978-0-8173-1417-0. Reviewed by Thomas E. Ross Published on H-AmIndian (March, 2007) Patricia Lerch has devoted more than two presents rational assumptions about the Wacca‐ decades to the study of the Waccamaw Siouan, a maw tribe's links to colonial Indians of southeast‐ non-federally recognized Indian tribe (the tribe is ern North Carolina and the Cape Fear River recognized by the State of North Carolina) living drainage basin. in southeastern North Carolina. Her book is the She has no reservations about accepting the first volume devoted to the Waccamaw. It con‐ notion that Indians living in the region were re‐ tains nine chapters and includes sixteen photo‐ ferred to as Waccamaw, Cape Fear Indians, and graphs, fourteen of which portray the Waccamaw Woccon. Whatever the name of Indians living in during the period from 1949 to the present. The the Cape Fear region during the colonial period, first four chapters provide background material they had to react to the European advance. In on several different Indian groups in southeast‐ some instances, the Indians responded to violence ern North Carolina and northeastern South Car‐ with violence, and to diplomacy and trade with olina, and are not specific to the Waccamaw Indi‐ peace treaties; they even took an active role in the ans. Nevertheless, they are important in setting Indian Wars and the enslavement of Africans. The the stage for the chapters that follow and for pro‐ records, however, do no detail what eventually viding a broad, historical overview of the Wacca‐ happened to the Indians of the Cape Fear.
    [Show full text]
  • The Living History Classroom (Fall 2015)
    FALL 2015 Living History CLASSROOM Through the Wilderness Exploring North Carolina with Lawson, Tuscarora & the First Printing Press A Publication of Tryon Palace “The State of North Carolina from the best Authorities &c.” is a map drawn by Samuel Lewis in 1795. Does it look different from the North Carolina we see today? Mapping Our State Words to Know When traveling today, many of us chart our course by using , which GPS GPS: short for Global Positioning System, relies on information from satellites and maps to make sure we arrive at which uses satellites and maps to determine our intended destination. People living in the 17th and 18th centuries location could not use a computer system. To find their way, they relied on Cartography: the science of making maps for paper maps. defined transportation routes used to trade Cartography is a skill that combines mathematics, geography, and art goods on land and waterways to produce a physical map of the earth. Accurate maps define boundaries Cartographer: a person who combines and settle arguments over land. They also show dangerous waters and observation, math, and drawing to make maps coastlines to help save the lives of sailors. Land surveyor: a person whose job is to Cartographers in the 1600s and 1700s often used surveying skills. measure and examine an area of land Land surveyors used chains to measure the distance between two points. Theodolite: a surveying tool made from a Surveyor’s chains were 66 feet long with 100 links. Each link was about 8 telescope, it sits on a tripod and measures inches long.
    [Show full text]
  • Piscataway Indian Nation
    Piscataway Indian Nation From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search The Piscataway Indian Nation is a non-state, non-federally recognized Native American tribal nation, which, at one time, was one of the most populous and powerful Native polities of the Chesapeake region. By the early seventeenth century, the Piscataway had come to exercise hegemony over other Native American groups on the north bank of the Potomac River. While Piscataway fortunes declined as Maryland colony grew and prospered, the Piscataway continue to be leaders among the tribal nations of Maryland, as well as throughout Indian Country in their commitment to Indigenous and Human Rights. Contents [hide] 1 Geography 2 Government 3 History o 3.1 The Indigenous Chesapeake o 3.2 English Colonization o 3.3 The Long Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries o 3.4 Piscataway Revival 4 Sources 5 External links [edit] Geography The Piscataway Indian Nation is a long-established tribal nation of Native Americans inhabiting traditional homelands on the western shore of Maryland's Chesapeake Bay in the areas of Charles County, Prince George's County, and St. Mary's County, located near two metropolitan areas, Baltimore and Washington, D.C. [edit] Government The current chief of the Piscataway Indian Nation is Billy Redwing Tayac, an outspoken leader in the movement for Indigenous and Human Rights, and the son of the late Chief Turkey Tayac, a prominent figure in the Native American revitalization and reclamation movements of the last half of the twentieth century. [edit] History No scientific scholarship supports the theory that those claiming today to be Piscataway Indians are actually descended from the historical tribe of that name.
    [Show full text]
  • Potomac River News, Page 3 Classifieds, Page 7 Entertainment, Page 6 V Classifieds
    Piscataway Tribal Ongoing Connections To the Potomac River News, Page 3 Classifieds, Page 7 Classifieds, v Entertainment, Page 6 Piscataway Conoy Native American speaker Mario Harley talks about Piscataway Conoy past and present at Discovering Wildflowers Great Falls Tavern. Requested in home 5-16-19 home in Requested Time sensitive material. material. sensitive Time Along the C&O Canal Postmaster: Attention News, Page 4 WSS ECR Postal Customer Postal permit #322 permit Easton, MD Easton, Obituary: Peter M. Kimm PAID U.S. Postage U.S. Page 6 STD PRSRT Photo by Debbie Stevens/The Almanac by Debbie Stevens/The Photo May 15-21, 2019 online at potomacalmanac.com 2 ❖ Potomac Almanac ❖ May 15-21, 2019 www.ConnectionNewspapers.com Potomac Almanac Editor Steven Mauren News 703-778-9415 or [email protected] See www.potomacalmanac.com Piscataway Conoy Tribe of Maryland Shares History, Present Piscataway continue connection to the Potomac River. he Piscataway people and their ancestors have lived in Mary Tland for more than 13,000 years. All Piscataway are con- scious of a history that reaches back long before Europeans had invaded their home- land. Despite having endured the effects of colonialism for nearly 400 years, the Piscataway continued to thrive, leaving their mark on the history of the region, ac- cording to a report by Many place names throughout the region, for example, are derived from Algonquian words used by the Piscataway. The Piscataway Conoy were recognized in 2012 by then-Gov. Martin O’Malley after decades of lobbying. “American Indians have, through their cultural heritage, his- torical influence, and participation in pub- lic life, and helped to make the State of Maryland the great State that it is today,” the orders read, according to press reports from the time.
    [Show full text]
  • Problem and Promise: Scientific Experts and the Mixed-Blood in the Modern U.S., 1870-1970
    PROBLEM AND PROMISE: SCIENTIFIC EXPERTS AND THE MIXED-BLOOD IN THE MODERN U.S., 1870-1970 By Michell Chresfield Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in History August, 2016 Nashville, Tennessee Approved: Sarah Igo, Ph.D. Daniel Sharfstein, J.D. Arleen Tuchman, Ph.D. Daniel Usner, Ph.D. Copyright © 2016 by Michell Chresfield All Rights Reserved ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation is the result of many years of hard work and sacrifice, only some of which was my own. First and foremost I’d like to thank my parents, including my “bonus mom,” for encouraging my love of learning and for providing me with every opportunity to pursue my education. Although school has taken me far away from you, I am forever grateful for your patience, understanding, and love. My most heartfelt thanks also go to my advisor, Sarah Igo. I could not have asked for a more patient, encouraging, and thoughtful advisor. Her incisive comments, generous feedback, and gentle spirit have served as my guideposts through one of the most challenging endeavors of my life. I am so fortunate to have had the opportunity to grow as a scholar under her tutelage. I’d also like to thank my dissertation committee members: Arleen Tuchman, Daniel Sharfstein, and Daniel Usner for their thoughtful comments and support throughout the writing process. I’d especially like to thank Arleen Tuchman for her many pep talks, interventions, and earnest feedback; they made all the difference. I’d be remiss if I didn’t also thank my mentors from Notre Dame who first pushed me towards a life of the mind.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 Tribes, 1 State: Native Americans in North Carolina
    8 Tribes, 1 State: North Carolina’s Native Peoples As of 2014, North Carolina has 8 state and federally recognized Native American tribes. In this lesson, students will study various Native American tribes through a variety of activities, from a PowerPoint led discussion, to a study of Native American art. The lesson culminates with students putting on a Native American Art Show about the 8 recognized tribes. Grade 8 Materials “8 Tribes, 1 State: Native Americans in North Carolina” PowerPoint, available here: o http://civics.sites.unc.edu/files/2014/06/NCNativeAmericans1.pdf o To view this PDF as a projectable presentation, save the file, click “View” in the top menu bar of the file, and select “Full Screen Mode”; upon completion of presentation, hit ESC on your keyboard to exit the file o To request an editable PPT version of this presentation, send a request to [email protected] “Native American Art Handouts #1 – 7”, attached North Carolina Native American Tribe handouts, attached o Lumbee o Eastern Band of Cherokee o Coharie o Haliwa-­­‑ Saponi o Meherrin o Occaneechi Band of the Saponi Nation o Sappony o Waccamaw Siouan “Create a Native American Art Exhibition” handout, attached “Native Americans in North Carolina Fact Sheet”, attached Brown paper or brown shopping bags (for the culminating project) Graph paper (for the culminating project) Art supplies (markers, colored pencils, crayons, etc. Essential Questions: What was life like for Native Americans before the arrival of Europeans? What happened to most Native American tribes after European arrival? What hardships have Native Americans faced throughout their history? How many state and federally recognized tribes are in North Carolina today? Duration 90 – 120 minutes Teacher Preparation A note about terminology: For this lesson, the descriptions Native American and American Indian are 1 used interchangeably when referring to more than one specific tribe.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Tribes Included in Cost Areas
    Table of Tribes Included in Cost Areas Eastern Woodlands Cost Area State Tribes Alabama State Alabama N/A Mowa Band of Alabama Mowa Band of Choctaw Choctaw Poarch Band of Creek Alabama Poarch Band of Creek Indians of AL Mashantucket W. Connecticut Mashantucket Pequoit Tribe of CT Pequot Mohegan of CT Connecticut Mohegan Indian Tribe of CT Paucatuck E. Pequot Connecticut Paucatuck Eastern Pequoit Tribe Schaghticoke Connecticut Schaghticoke Indian Tribe of CT Eastern Muskogee Florida N/A Seminole (Tampa) Florida Seminole Tribe of FL Seminole (Big Florida Seminole Tribe of FL Cyprus) Seminole (Brighton) Florida Seminole Tribe of FL Lower Muskogee Georgia N/A Pokagon Potawatomi Indiana Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians Sac & Fox Iowa Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississii in Iowa Aroostook Band of Maine Arrostook Band of Indians Micmac MicMac Houlton Maliseet Maine Holuton Band of Maliseet Indians Indian Township Maine Passamaquoddy-Indian Township Reservation Penobscot Maine Penobscot Tribe of ME Pleasant Point Maine Passamaqupddy-Pleasant Point Reservation Mashpee Wampanoag Massachusetts N/A Nipmuc Massachusetts N/A Wampanoag (Gay Massachusetts Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnqh) of MA Head) Bay Mills Michigan Bay Mills of the Sault Ste. Marie Band of Chippewa Grand Traverse Michigan Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Hannahville Michigan Hannahville Community of Michigan Potawatomi Huron Potawatomi Michigan Nottawseppi Huron Potawatomi Keweenaw Bay Michigan Keweenaw Bay Community of Chippewa Lac Vieux Desert Michigan Lav Vieux Desert Band of Chippewa Little River Michigan Little River Band of Ottawa Indians Little Traverse Michigan Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians Manistique Michigan Sault Ste Marie Chippewa Tribe of MI Page 1 Table of Tribes Included in Cost Areas Eastern Woodlands Cost Area State Tribes Pokagon Potawatomi Michigan Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians of MI Saginaw Chippewa Michigan Saginaw Chippewa Tribe of MI Sault Ste.
    [Show full text]
  • Preservation and Partners: a History of Piscataway Park
    Preservation and Partners: A History of Piscataway Park Janet A. McDonnell, PhD December 2020 Resource Stewardship and Science, National Capital Area, National Park Service and Organization of American Historians EXECUTIVE SUMMARY During the early republic period of American history, President George Washington was the most renowned resident of the Potomac River valley. His sprawling Mount Vernon estate sat on a hill directly across the Potomac River from the 17th century Marshall Hall estate in Maryland. There is ample evidence that Washington and his guests enjoyed and very much appreciated the stunning view. Many years later preserving this view would become the major impetus for establishing what we know today as Piscataway Park (PISC), a few miles south of Washington, DC. These lands along the Maryland shore of Potomac River were actively cultivated during George Washington’s time, and the existing park setting, which includes agricultural lands and open spaces interspersed with forests and wetlands, closely approximates that historic scene. The National Park Service’s (NPS) primary goal and responsibility in managing the park has been, and continues to be, preserving this historic scene of open fields and wooded areas and ensuring that it does not authorize any landscape alterations except those that would restore previously undisturbed sites, reduce visual intrusions, or maintain open fields. The NPS continues to take into account the slope and orientation of the terrain and the tree cover when considering the location of any new facilities. Piscataway Park and its associated lands are for the most part held under scenic easements and constitute a National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) historic district made up of nearly 5,000 acres of meadow, woodland, and wetland, along six miles of the Potomac River shoreline from the head of Piscataway Creek to the historic Marshall Hall in Maryland’s Prince George’s and Charles counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Historical Magazine, 1979, Volume 74, Issue No. 2
    •\5 Historical Magazine Published Quarterly by The Museum and Library of Maryland History The Maryland Historical Society Summer 1979 MARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY BOARD OF TRUSTEES J. Fife Symington, Jr., Chairman* Leonard C. Crewe, Jr., President* Robert G. Merrick, Sr., Honorary Chairman* H. Furlong Baldwin Mrs. Thomas F. Johnson Mrs. Emory J. Barber H. Irvine Keyser, II James R. Herbert Boone Richard R. Kline Philip Carroll Mrs. Frederick W. Lafferty* Mrs. James F. Colwill Charles D. Lyon James W. Constable Calvert C. McCabe, Jr.* Owen Daly, II* Joseph H. McLain Emory Dobson Robert G. Merrick, Jr. Mrs. Gerson G. Eisenberg John E. Motz John G. Evans* Thomas S. Nichols Charles O. Fisher George M. Radcliffe* Mrs. Jacob France (Honorary) Adrian P. Reed Louis L. Goldstein Richard C. Riggs, Sr. Louise Gore Richard C. Riggs, Jr.* Kingdon Gould, Jr. David Rogers William Grant John D. Schapiro Benjamin H. Griswold, III Jacques T. Schlenger* Louis G. Hecht Truman T. Semans T. Hughlett Henry, Jr. A. Russell Slagle C. A. Porter Hopkins T. Rowland Slingluff, Jr. Samuel Hopkins* John T. Stinson E. Ralph Hostetter Mrs. W. Wallace Symington, Jr. Elmer M. Jackson, Jr. T. Hammond Welsh, Jr. Mrs. Harold Duane Jacobs William C. Whitridge Louis P. Jenkins William L. Wilson *Executive Committee James T. Wollon, Jr. MARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY COUNCIL Helen Delich Bentley Mrs. Frederick W. Lafferty* Mrs. Calhoun Bond Calvert C. McCabe, Jr.* James W. Constable Robert G. Merrick, Sr.* Leonard C. Crewe, Jr., President* Morgan H. Pritchett Owen Daly, II* George M. Radcliffe* Mrs. Raymond P. Delano, Jr. Richard C. Riggs, Jr.* John G.
    [Show full text]