The Jaipur Economic and Industrial Museum
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works Title Colonial Frames, "Native" Claims: The Jaipur Economic and Industrial Museum Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9z92n746 Journal Art Bulletin, 96(2) ISSN 0004-3079 Author Ray, SUGATA Publication Date 2014-07-10 DOI 10.1080/00043079.2014.899180 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California This article was downloaded by: [University of California, Berkeley] On: 11 July 2014, At: 11:08 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK The Art Bulletin Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rcab20 Colonial Frames, “Native” Claims: The Jaipur Economic and Industrial Museum Sugata Ray Published online: 10 Jul 2014. To cite this article: Sugata Ray (2014) Colonial Frames, “Native” Claims: The Jaipur Economic and Industrial Museum, The Art Bulletin, 96:2, 196-212 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00043079.2014.899180 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content. This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms- and-conditions Colonial Frames, “Native” Claims: The Jaipur Economic and Industrial Museum Sugata Ray It has today become de rigueur to begin any discussion on rationalist historicism were to fundamentally transform the nineteenth-century colonial museums by invoking Rudyard colony. For the masses visiting the museum, this space of Kipling’s fictionalized encounter between his father, John modern pedagogy remained the space of enchantment. The Lockwood Kipling (1838–1911), the colonial arts administra- modern museum thus resolutely remained a “Wonder tor, and a Buddhist lama in the “Ajaib-Gher—the Wonder House,” the Ajaib-Gher. While scholars see in this epistemo- House, as the natives call the Lahore Museum.”1 Kipling’s logical failure an enabling “move towards hybridity and differ- choice of the Lahore Museum (established 1864) as a meto- ence,”8 a subaltern reworking of history and the institutions nymic space to enact this fateful encounter between “Western” that produced it, I want to make a different argument. science and “Eastern” religiosity, between “modern” knowl- I suggest that we need to rethink the institutional frame- edge and “traditional” belief, between “rational” orderliness works of colonial museology beyond the binaries of success and “irrational” disarray, binaries ad infinitum, was indeed and failure. Perhaps the failure of the museum made possible a appropriate. The colonial museum, as an instrument of different politics for viewers who only came to see the Wonder authoritative knowledge making, was, after all, manufactured House, the Ajaib-Gher. Perhaps the project of knowing and dis- by the British Empire as “a powerful aid to loyalty and good playing the colony was indeed ruptured, broken, and made government.”2 Not only did the museum fabricate an futile when faced by the boisterous gaze of subaltern masses. immense archive of useful knowledge and a fictive past for the But how, then, do we understand the politics of the “native” colony, but it also served as a space through which the empire elite who built museums across colonies worldwide in the late rhetorically asserted the moral necessity, the civilizing mission, nineteenth and the early twentieth centuries? Was the “native” of its presence in the colony.3 museum merely marking the triumph of Western science and Along with imperial museums, the late nineteenth and technology in the colony? Do we once again return to imperial- early twentieth centuries were marked by the establishment izing strategies of “first in Europe, then elsewhere,”9 paradigms of a number of museums under the benefaction of the indig- that still privilege the metanarratives of European modernity enous elite in colonies worldwide. In 1908, for instance, Mar- and its claim to the universal? cus Simaika (1864–1944), an officer in the Egyptian State Perhaps the question can then be tentatively reframed as Railways, set up the Coptic Museum in Cairo. In contrast to not merely that of the success or the failure of the museum its imperial counterpart, the “native” museum emerges in in the colony but as that of a creative reinscription of failure scholarship as a successful space to enact the drama of colo- itself. Using the Jeypore [Jaipur] Economic and Industrial nial modernity—a space through which the colonized elite Museum, a nineteenth-century “native” museum in western argued for modern self-representation, employing to their India, as a lens, we can read museology in the colony as a pro- advantage post-Enlightenment discourses on scientificity and ductive failure, a productive reinscription of the sites where modern knowledge forms. Writing on the creation of the modernity broke down at the margins of the empire (Fig. 1). Coptic Museum, Donald M. Reid thus notes: “By the 1890s, a Established in 1887 by Sawai Madho Singh II (r. 1880–1922), few Europeans were turning their attention to Coptic art and the ruler of the western Indian princely state of Jaipur, the architecture, and it was their enthusiasm that inspired Marcus Economic and Industrial Museum was a contested site from its 4 10 Downloaded by [University of California, Berkeley] at 11:08 11 July 2014 Simaika to found the Coptic Museum.” According to schol- very conception. While the colonial state’s archive bears ars such as Reid, the “native” museum was then a space traces of this contestation, the marked silence on the part of through which the (Western-educated) indigenous elite the principal patron has led to a “loss” in understanding the articulated a (Western) modern subject position “inspired” role played by the indigenous elite in framing the design and by their colonial masters. Using Gyan Prakash’s oft-cited the pedagogy of the Jaipur Museum. Perhaps this “loss” was expression, it was a moment when “science went native” in intentional. The Jaipur monarchy’s refusal to participate in the colony.5 In India, for instance, the late nineteenth cen- the British Empire’s leviathan project of creating a colonial tury saw the opening of a number of museums under the archive was legendary and a source of ire for the British Resi- benefaction of the princely states, often with active support dent at the Jaipur court.11 The carefully preserved records in from the British residents at court.6 the state’s archive bear no testimony to the desires, aspira- tions, and demands of the “native” actors who reframed late House of Knowledge/House of Wonder nineteenth-century modern museological practices in the col- Recent scholarship on museological practices, nevertheless, ony. How, then, do we recover the contours of nineteenth- posits the museum in the colony as a “failure.”7 The nine- century “native” museological practices when the only voice teenth-century museum failed in its pedagogical role as a har- that can be heard today is that of the colonial state? binger of modernity, as a space through which narratives of The Jaipur Museum offers us a compelling case study Western scientificity, modern knowledge systems, and a to rethink the methodologies that need to be employed to THE JAIPUR ECONOMIC AND INDUSTRIAL MUSEUM 197 1 Attributed to Samuel Swinton Jacob, Jaipur Economic and Industrial Museum, 1887 (photograph by the author) understand micropractices at the margins of the British transformed Jaipur, their capital, into a modern city with a Empire that strategically evaded the colonial archive, and Public Works Department, a school for women, a gasworks, a thus history itself. Taking the museum itself seriously, I read hospital run by a European surgeon, and an art school—“all the architectural design and the display at the Jaipur things necessary to western municipal welfare and comfort,” Museum as a productive failure, a creative reinscription of as Rudyard Kipling noted in his description of the city.13 colonial iterations of modernity and its museological prac- Established in 1727, Jaipur (today the capital of the Indian tices. In doing so, I suggest that the museum allowed the elite state of Rajasthan), with its broad roads, remarkable urban of Jaipur to articulate a modern museological practice that infrastructure, and spectacular palaces