DOCSLIB.ORG

040401/CAB258 Date:1 April 2004

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
040401/CAB258 Date:1 April 2004 12(B) -1 Report Number: 040401/CAB258 Date:1 April 2004 TUNBRIDGE WELLS BOROUGH COUNCIL REQUEST FOR DECISION BY CABINET Part 1 Report Non-Exempt Title and Executive Summary: * INTEGRATED KENT FRANCHISE – TRAIN SERVICE SPECIFICATION A CONSULTATION DOCUMENT This report outlines the proposed Train Service Specification to be put to the preferred bidders for the proposed Integrated Kent Franchise. The report considers the likely impact on the Borough and recommends comments to be made. The deadline for submission of comments is 23 April 2004 and the Cabinet view will be submitted to the Strategic Rail Authority on the understanding that it may be reviewed following Full Council consideration on 21 April 2004. WARD: ALL HEAD OF STRATEGY AND DEVELOPMENT: Contact Officer: Adrian Neve Extension: 3271 PORTFOLIO: PLANNING & TRANSPORTATION RECOMMENDATION(S): That Cabinet agrees this report as the Borough Council’s response to Strategic Rail Authority on the “Integrated Kent Franchise – Train Service Specification – A Consultation Document”, subject to ratification by Full Council on 21 April 2004. Reasons: To ensure a formal Borough Council view on the proposed service arrangements on the majority of the railways within the Borough is submitted to the Strategic Rail Authority. Report of Head of Strategy & Development Continued * (B) INTEGRATED KENT FRANCHISE – TRAIN SERVICE SPECIFICATION A CONSULTATION DOCUMENT Executive Summary This report (040401/CAB258) outlines the proposed Train Service Specification to be put to the preferred bidders for the proposed Integrated Kent Franchise. The report considers the likely impact on the Borough and recommends comments to be made. The deadline for submission of comments is 23 April 2004 and the Cabinet view will be submitted to the Strategic Rail Authority on the understanding that it may be reviewed following Full Council consideration on 21 April 2004. FOR DECISION Background and Programme (1) In 2003 the Connex South Eastern franchise agreement was terminated. This train operating agreement covered the majority of railways through the borough. Ashurst Station, on the western boundary of the borough, continues to be operated under the GoVia franchise agreement. (2) On 9 November 2003 the “caretaker” company, South East Trains (SET), took over operations of the South Eastern franchise. This company will continue with operations until a new Train Operating Company is appointed. (3) In November 2002, through the Planning and Transportation Portfolio Holder, the Borough Council submitted a response to a Select Committee of Kent County Council and Medway Council on the issue of running domestic services on the CTRL (CTRL-DS). These would travel along the completed route through the proposed stations at Ebbsfleet and Stratford International Stations and then to the new terminus at Kings Cross St. Pancras. (4) Pending a Secretary of State decision, and in line with the Capacity Utilisation Policy, the SRA took the decision to incorporate the operation of these proposed services with the operation of the remainder of the South Eastern railway network. The revised franchise operation is termed the Integrated Kent Franchise (IKF). The Secretary of State has recently advised the SRA to proceed with the IKF proposition on the basis that CTRL-DS will operate, to a level of 8 trains per hour (tph) in peak periods. (5) A shortlist of four bidders for the IKF has been drawn up. These are: § DSB (Danish State Railways) § GNER Holdings Ltd § First Kent Integrated Railways Ltd (First Group plc) § London South Eastern Railways Ltd (a consortium of Go-Ahead Group and Keolis) (6) On 5 January 2004 all bidders were issued with a draft Invitation to Tender prior to final clarifications being undertaken after this current consultation. The proposal is that final tender documentation then will be issued in summer 2004. (7) It is anticipated that the new franchisee will commence operations on the national network early in 2005 whilst the CTRL-DS are to come on line in 2007. CTRL international services will continue to be operated by London and Continental Railways under their Development Agreement with the Government. Report of the Head of Strategy & Development Continued (8) The current consultation seeks comments on the proposed Train Service Specification for the IKF. Comments are required to be with the SRA by 23 April 2004. (9) It is stated in the document that the SRA will continue to engage stakeholders throughout the refranchising period and the introduction of the IKF. Furthermore, the Borough Council has already received an approach from one of the bidding companies seeking the Borough Council’s position. It is proposed that, further to this formal response, officers from the Borough Council will meet representatives from the SRA and bidders through meetings of the West Kent Local Strategic Partnership Transport Sub-group. This will enable a co-ordinated West Kent approach to the SRA and bidders. Assessment of Proposals (10) The Foreword of the consultation document states that “In developing the IKF the Strategic Rail Authority (SRA) wishes to make the best use of the whole railway network in the region including the CTRL.” (11) In order to achieve this the SRA has set the following objectives: “Deliver better performance and service quality for the passenger; Eliminate cost escalation, both in the cost of train provision and infrastructure; Ensure that the IKF contributes to regional planning goals, including the regeneration of Kent, and the Mayor’s London Plan; Improve rail journey times to and from key towns and cities in the area; and More closely integrate public transport provision.” [Integrated Kent Franchise – Train Service Specification - A Consultation Document Paragraph 2.2: Background to IKF approach] (12) Further to the above objectives which recognise the regeneration and growth aspirations of the Thames Gateway, Ashford and Hastings, the proposals for the IKF service specification also may need to reflect other major projects. These include the East London Line; Crossrail; Thameslink 2000; the Mayor’s aspirations for a metro-style service within the Greater London Area; and the Olympic 2012 bid. (13) The programme of Mark 1 (slam door) rolling stock replacement is underway and the Power Supply Upgrade is a longstanding constraint on the network that the rail industry is working to remove. There will continue, however, to be other physical constraints that will remain unresolved such as junction capacities, platform lengths and available pathways to London termini. (14) The proposed Service Specification is divided into six areas: § London East; § London West; § Medway; § East Kent; § West Kent; and § Maidstone. (15) The Hastings-Tunbridge Wells-London line is covered by the West Kent area, as are some services between Paddock Wood and London. The remaining services through Paddock Wood station are covered by the East Kent and Maidstone areas. Report of the Head of Strategy & Development Continued (16) The stated aim for the proposed Service Specification is to provide passengers with a consistent service pattern across the day supplemented during peak periods by additional trains either at regular intervals or concentrated around the high peak. Furthermore the SRA are looking to promote that: “The IKF train service specification proposes that the available capacity at London Bridge is focused on the Kent Link services that currently call there with the majority of the ‘main line’ services in the morning peak utilising the ‘Through Passenger Loop’ that bypasses the station’s platforms”. Furthermore, in recognising the capacity limitations of the approaches to London Bridge and Charing Cross, and the provision of CTRL-DS, the proposed service specification seeks to simplify the spread of IKF service across the London Termini. This is termed “substitution”. The proposed service specifications show that many Charing Cross and Canon Street trains may omitted London Bridge as a stop if a platform is not available. (17) For the current South East network the weekday (Monday to Friday) peaks are viewed as three hour periods at either end of the day. In the morning the peak is for trains arriving at their London termini between 0700hrs and 0959hrs and in the evening it is for trains departing their London termini between 1600hrs and 1859hrs. On the CTRL the peaks are two-hour peaks in the morning between 0700hrs and 0859hrs and in the evening between 1600hrs and 1759hrs. The proposed Saturday services are to be as the Monday to Friday service but without the peak hour additions. Sunday services would be a reduced Saturday service with changes to reflect the need for engineering works. (18) Table 1, below, summarises the proposed Service Specifications for routes likely to carry travellers to, through or from the borough. It is stated that, for all descriptions of Service Specifications those to London are mirrored in the opposite direction. Table 1: Proposed Local Service Specifications Line Standard Service a.m./p.m. Peak Notes [trains/hour] Additions (tph) [trains/peak period] (tppp) East Kent Area London to Dover via 2tph no peak additions Service CX01 has a Tonbridge and contra-peak stop at Paddock Wood (CX01 & CX02) Paddock Wood West Kent Area London-Hastings 2tph 2tppp (CS01) 1tph limited stop (CX04) (CX03 &CX04) London-Tunbridge 2tph no peak additions Stopping service from Wells Orpington (CX04 &CX06) London to Ashford none 4tppp International (via Tonbridge) (2xCX25, CX26 & CS02) Maidstone Area Strood to Tonbridge via 1tph no peak additions Some rural stations Paddock Wood have reduced service (SD01) Note: CX - Charing Cross; CS - Cannon Street; SD – Strood Report of the Head of Strategy & Development Continued (19) For brevity only the proposed services for the three areas that directly affect the borough’s stations are summarised. In addition the service specifications for Wadhurst, Frant, Marden and Staplehurst stations are considered. If Members require to view other details they are set out at sections 7.2, 7.3 and 7.4 of the consultation document and in the associated tables at the rear of that document.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kent Rail Strategy 2021
    Kent Rail Strategy 2021 Public Consultation Report January 2021 Kent Rail Strategy 2021 Consultation Report Table of Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 4 2. Consultation process................................................................................................................ 4 3. Consultation responses ............................................................................................................ 8 4. Kent Rail Strategy ambitions .................................................................................................. 10 5. Rail policy .............................................................................................................................. 15 6. Fares policy ........................................................................................................................... 20 7. Rail infrastructure enhancements ........................................................................................... 25 8. Rolling stock improvements ................................................................................................... 29 9. Passenger services ................................................................................................................ 33 10. Community Rail Partnerships (CRPs) ................................................................................. 37 11. Rail freight provision ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Railway Development Society Limited Is a Not-For-Profit Company Limited by Guarantee Registered in England & Wales No.5011634
    railse no. 128 June 2015 Railfuture in London and the South East quarterly branch newsletter The independent campaign for a better passenger and freight rail network Terminal decline of diesels Refreshing electrification London terminals – a group of 14 mainline stations The most recent Network Rail strategy on electrification spread around Zone 1, all but one of which are fully was the Network RUS published back in October 2009. equipped for electric traction, yet half of them are still Since September 2012 the Network RUS Working invaded by noisy, smelly and polluting diesel trains. Group: Electrification ‘refresh’ remit has been to review That’s not to mention the diesels’ higher operating and options for further electrification over the next 30 years, maintenance costs, and generally poorer performance and consider a priority for delivery. A consultation draft in terms of reliability and acceleration. Railfuture has is expected imminently, postponed from pre-purdah. long advocated the various benefits of electric traction. The drivers for further electrification are seen as: ~ reduced rolling stock leasing, maintenance and operating costs; ~ reduced infrastructure maintenance costs; ~ improved rolling stock reliability; ~ reduced journey times and potential reduction in rolling stock requirement; ~ shorter freight routeings and potential release of capacity through more consistent train performance; ~ ability to haul greater freight loads; ~ enhancing capacity on un-electrified routes through cascade of diesel rolling stock; ~ increased network availability through provision of diversionary routes; ~ lower emissions and reduced noise; ~ compliance with environmental policy legislation. The shape of things to come – IEP train for Paddington The ‘Smelly Seven’ stations are: Euston – Virgin’s Voyagers King’s Cross – Grand Central and Hull Trains London Bridge – Southern’s Turbostars, to Uckfield Marylebone – the only all-diesel London terminus Paddington – all, except Heathrow Express/Connect St.
    [Show full text]
  • Glyne Gap – Operational Assessment (Pdf)
    Proposed new passenger station at Glyne Gap, Bexhill Technical note – Stage 3b: Operational assessment March 2013 Rother District Council, East Sussex County Council, Land Securities Group PLC Confidential Proposed311776 ITD newITN passenger1 A Document5 station at Glyne Gap,5 October Bexhill 2012 Technical note – Stage 3b: Operational assessment March 2013 Rother District Council, East Sussex County Council, Land Securities Group PLC Confidential Rother District Council, Town Hall, Bexhill-on-Sea TN39 3JX Mott MacDonald, Spring Bank House, 33 Stamford Street, Altrincham, Cheshire WA14 1ES, United Kingdom T +44(0) 161 926 4000 F +44(0) 161 926 4100, W www.mottmac.com Proposed new passenger station at Glyne Gap, Bexhill Confidential Issue and revision record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description A 26 Nov 2012 MCS KP RJF Draft technical note summarising operational issues surrounding Glyne Gap station B 28 March 2013 MCS/KP KP/RJF RJF Final version with client comments addressed This document is issued for the party which commissioned it We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this and for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned document being relied upon by any other party, or being used project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which used for any other purpose. is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it.
    [Show full text]
  • NS Annual Report 2018
    See www.nsannualreport.nl for the online version NS Annual Report 2018 Table of contents 2 In brief 4 2018 in a nutshell 8 Foreword by the CEO 12 The profile of NS 16 Our strategy Activities in the Netherlands 23 Results for 2018 27 The train journey experience 35 Operational performance 47 World-class stations Operations abroad 54 Abellio 56 Strategy 58 Abellio United Kingdom (UK) 68 Abellio Germany 74 Looking ahead NS Group 81 Report by the Supervisory Board 94 Corporate governance 100 Organisation of risk management 114 Finances in brief 126 Our impact on the environment and on society 134 NS as an employer in the Netherlands 139 Organisational improvements 145 Dialogue with our stakeholders 164 Scope and reporting criteria Financial statements 168 Financial statements 238 Company financial statements Other information 245 Combined independent auditor’s report on the financial statements and sustainability information 256 NS ten-year summary This annual report is published both Dutch and English. In the event of any discrepancies between the Dutch and English version, the Dutch version will prevail. 1 NS annual report 2018 In brief More satisfied 4.2 million trips by NS app gets seat passengers in the OV-fiets searcher Netherlands (2017: 3.1 million) On some routes, 86% gave travelling by passengers can see which train a score of 7 out of carriages have free seats 10 or higher Customer 95.1% chance of Clean trains: 68% of satisfaction with HSL getting a seat passengers gave a South score of 7 out of 10 (2017: 95.0%) or higher 83% of
    [Show full text]
  • Report Format Including Decision Notice for Cabinet
    Swale Rail To: Swale Joint Transportation Board By: Rhiannon Mort – Principal Transport Planner, KCC Environment, Planning and Enforcement Date: 7 September 2015 Classification: For recommendation Summary: This report updates Members on the activities of the Kent Community Rail Partnership, in relation to the “Swale Rail” line between Sittingbourne and Sheerness - on - Sea. 1.0 Introduction and Background 1. Introduction 1.1 This report provides background and an update on the activities of the Kent Community Rail Partnership in relation to the Swale Rail Line. 2.0 Background 2.1 The Kent Community Rail Partnership (CRP) was established in 2003, to support less frequently used rail lines in Kent, including the Medway Valley Line and Swale Rail. 2.2 The Swale Rail extends from Sittingbourne to Sheerness - on - Sea providing a half hourly service to passengers. The Medway Valley Line extends from Strood to Paddock Wood, with the extension to Tonbridge currently being considered. 2.3 The Kent CRP aims to bring together widely varied partners in order to bring social, economic and environmental benefits to the communities served by rural and secondary rail services. 2.4 Core funding is provided by Kent County Council, Medway Council, Southeastern and Tonbridge & Malling Borough Council. The partnership is also supported by a number of public and private sector organisations. 2.5 In 2014 Sustrans were appointed as the host organisation. Two part time officers currently work on behalf of the Kent CRP; a Project Officer and Engagement Officer. 2.6 The Swale Rail Line Group meet on a quarterly basis to bring together local stakeholders to help drive forward Kent CRP initiatives for the Swale Rail Line 3.0 Activities 3.1 The Kent CRP undertakes activities to promote the use of rail by local residents, businesses and visitors through community and school engagement work, marketing and communication.
    [Show full text]
  • Submissions to the Call for Evidence from Organisations
    Submissions to the call for evidence from organisations Ref Organisation RD - 1 Abbey Flyer Users Group (ABFLY) RD - 2 ASLEF RD - 3 C2c RD - 4 Chiltern Railways RD - 5 Clapham Transport Users Group RD - 6 London Borough of Ealing RD - 7 East Surrey Transport Committee RD – 8a East Sussex RD – 8b East Sussex Appendix RD - 9 London Borough of Enfield RD - 10 England’s Economic Heartland RD – 11a Enterprise M3 LEP RD – 11b Enterprise M3 LEP RD - 12 First Great Western RD – 13a Govia Thameslink Railway RD – 13b Govia Thameslink Railway (second submission) RD - 14 Hertfordshire County Council RD - 15 Institute for Public Policy Research RD - 16 Kent County Council RD - 17 London Councils RD - 18 London Travelwatch RD – 19a Mayor and TfL RD – 19b Mayor and TfL RD - 20 Mill Hill Neighbourhood Forum RD - 21 Network Rail RD – 22a Passenger Transport Executive Group (PTEG) RD – 22b Passenger Transport Executive Group (PTEG) – Annex RD - 23 London Borough of Redbridge RD - 24 Reigate, Redhill and District Rail Users Association RD - 25 RMT RD - 26 Sevenoaks Rail Travellers Association RD - 27 South London Partnership RD - 28 Southeastern RD - 29 Surrey County Council RD - 30 The Railway Consultancy RD - 31 Tonbridge Line Commuters RD - 32 Transport Focus RD - 33 West Midlands ITA RD – 34a West Sussex County Council RD – 34b West Sussex County Council Appendix RD - 1 Dear Mr Berry In responding to your consultation exercise at https://www.london.gov.uk/mayor-assembly/london- assembly/investigations/how-would-you-run-your-own-railway, I must firstly apologise for slightly missing the 1st July deadline, but nonetheless I hope that these views can still be taken into consideration by the Transport Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction by Our Chair, Sir Peter Hendy CBE
    Network Rail Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2018 Strategic report Introduction by our chair, Sir Peter Hendy CBE Railways are the economic arteries of our country and create economic growth, jobs and housing. We are really seeing a transformation take place at Network settlement, as will the System Operator. They will thus have Rail. We are now a much more customer-focused organisation, greater ownership and greater responsibility. with devolved structures that allow local managing directors and their leadership teams to put their customers and Our plan for CP6 will also start the railway’s digital age with passengers at the heart of everything they do. We have digital train control and signalling that will enable even more become more cost competitive, making over £85m of savings services to run, more safely and at a lower cost. To realise through our continuous improvement initiatives in the past these benefits there must be a whole system change across year alone. And we are also becoming a more diverse the industry to support it, and Network Rail is ready to play organisation. Since 2014 we have increased the number of its part in this transformation. women working at Network Rail by 32% and we have been The rail network is a complex set of national systems that recognised as an inclusive employer. need to work seamlessly in order to deliver for our customers. Since Mark Carne CBE took over as chief executive in 2014, he Unfortunately the May 2018 timetable change has not yet has completely transformed the safety culture at Network Rail.
    [Show full text]
  • Train Accessibility Guide Class 395 (Javelin) Free Wifi
    Train Accessibility Guide Class 395 (Javelin) Free WiFi Stock routes: High speed to St Pancras and the High speed rounder • On Board Managers to provide assistance • Colour contrasting fittings • Accessible areas marked by orange • Priority seating above door • Tactile surfaces • Portable ramps for enabling wheelchair/ • Door operation warning sound scooter access. Dimensions of wheelchair/ and light scooter not to exceed 1200mm (48”) in length, • Braille and tactile signage 700mm(28”) wide and 1350mm (53.5”) tall. • One wheelchair accessible toilet and There is a combined weight restriction of 300kg one closet toilet in each 6-car unit • Automatic aural and visual passenger • Wide doorways with sliding doors information displays within each coach • Two wheelchair spaces with low level passenger communication equipment Class 375 (Electrostar) Free WiFi Stock routes: Hastings Line via Tonbridge Chatham Mainline Sittingbourne to Sheerness Medway Valley Line Tonbridge to Strood Maidstone East Line from Canterbury West • Conductors on board to provide assistance information displays within each coach Kent Mainline • Accessible areas marked by burgundy • Two wheelchair spaces with low level from Ramsgate and Dover above door passenger communication equipment • Portable ramps for enabling wheelchair/ • Colour contrasting fittings scooter access. Dimensions of wheelchair/ • Priority seating scooter not to exceed 1200mm (48”) in • Tactile surfaces length, 700mm(28”) wide and 1350mm • Door operation warning sound and light (53.5”) tall. There is
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Gravesham Joint Transportation
    Public Document Pack Gravesham Joint Transportation Board Members of the Gravesham Joint Transportation Board are summoned to attend a meeting to be held at the Civic Centre, Gravesend, Kent on Wednesday, 8 September 2010 at 7.00 pm when the business specified in the following agenda is proposed to be transacted. S Kilkie Assistant Director (Communities) Agenda Part A Items likely to be considered in Public 1. Apologies 2. To sign the minutes of the previous meeting (Pages 5 - 14) 3. To declare any interests members may have in the items contained on this agenda. When declaring an interest members should state what their interest is. 4. To consider whether any items in Part A of the agenda should be considered in private or those (if any) in Part B in public 5. Petition - London Road, Northfleet, Kent - report herewith. (Pages 15 - 20) 6. Petition - The Ridgeway, Shorne, Kent - report herewith. (Pages 21 - 24) 7. Waiting Restrictions Consultation Responses - report herewith. (Pages 25 - 38) 8. Highway and Transportation Schemes Progress Report - report herewith. (Pages 39 - 44) 9. Local Transport Plan 3 - report herewith. (Pages 45 - 62) 10.Cross Lane East (No Entry), Gravesend, Kent - report herewith. (Pages 63 - 66) Civic Centre, Windmill Street, Gravesend Kent DA12 1AU 11.Speed Cameras in light of government changes - verbal report. 12.Streets included in the verge parking ban and the call for more nominations - verbal report. 13.Reports from Kent County Council's Policy Overview Scrutiny Committee (Pages 67 - for information - copies herewith. 114) 1. Winter Service Consultation 2010 2. Repairs to Weather Damaged Roads 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Competitive Tendering of Rail Services EUROPEAN CONFERENCE of MINISTERS of TRANSPORT (ECMT)
    Competitive EUROPEAN CONFERENCE OF MINISTERS OF TRANSPORT Tendering of Rail Competitive tendering Services provides a way to introduce Competitive competition to railways whilst preserving an integrated network of services. It has been used for freight Tendering railways in some countries but is particularly attractive for passenger networks when subsidised services make competition of Rail between trains serving the same routes difficult or impossible to organise. Services Governments promote competition in railways to Competitive Tendering reduce costs, not least to the tax payer, and to improve levels of service to customers. Concessions are also designed to bring much needed private capital into the rail industry. The success of competitive tendering in achieving these outcomes depends critically on the way risks are assigned between the government and private train operators. It also depends on the transparency and durability of the regulatory framework established to protect both the public interest and the interests of concession holders, and on the incentives created by franchise agreements. This report examines experience to date from around the world in competitively tendering rail services. It seeks to draw lessons for effective design of concessions and regulation from both of the successful and less successful cases examined. The work RailServices is based on detailed examinations by leading experts of the experience of passenger rail concessions in the United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, Sweden and the Netherlands. It also
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Corridor Evidence Base
    Transport Strategy for the South East ___ Strategic Corridor Evidence Base Client: Transport for the South East 10 December 2019 Our ref: 234337 Contents Page 4 Introduction 4 Definitions 5 Sources and Presentation 6 Strategic Corridor maps Appendices SE South East Radial Corridors SC South Central Radial Corridors SW South West Radial Corridors IO Inner Orbital Corridors OO Outer Orbital Corridors 3 | 10 December 2019 Strategic Corridor Evidence Base Introduction Introduction Definitions Table 1 | Strategic Corridor definitions 1 This document presents the evidence base 5 There are 23 Strategic Corridors in South East Area Ref Corridor Name M2/A2/Chatham Main Line underpinning the case for investment in the South England. These corridors were identified by SE1 (Dartford – Dover) East’s Strategic Corridors. It has been prepared for Transport for the South East, its Constituent A299/Chatham Main Line SE2 Transport for the South East (TfSE) – the emerging Authorities, and other stakeholders involved in the South (Faversham – Ramsgate) East M20/A20/High Speed 1/South Eastern Main Line SE3 Sub-National Transport Body for South East England development of the Economic Connectivity Review. (Dover – Sidcup) A21/Hastings Line – in support of its development of a Transport Since this review was published, the corridors have SE5 (Hastings – Sevenoaks) A22/A264/Oxted Line Strategy for South East England. been grouped into five areas. Some of the definitions SC1 (Crawley – Eastbourne) and names of some corridors cited in the Economic South M23/A23/Brighton
    [Show full text]
  • South Eastern Rail Franchise Consultation Response By
    South Eastern Rail franchise consultation Response by Campaign for Better Transport May 2017 1. Do our priorities correctly reflect your views? There are three omissions. Firstly, value for money is the number one issue for rail passengers, according to Transport Focus (https://www.transportfocus.org.uk/news-events-media/news/rail- passengers-prioritiesa-manifesto-for-improvement/). However, this is not mentioned in the consultation document priorities. In the recent weeks, passengers have been angry at South Eastern raising off-peak rail fares just before the holiday period begins, making it more expensive to have a day out at the Kent seaside or elsewhere. We would like the next franchise to prioritise keeping travel rail affordable. Secondly, we were surprised that improving the station environment is not listed as a priority. All journeys begin and end at stations and as it’s the last thing people experience as part of their journey, the experience stays with people and colours their experience of the whole journey and of rail travel generally. Especially when journeys are disrupted, passengers can end up spending hours every year at a station and so how pleasant or unpleasant it is makes a real difference. Finally, there is no mention of passenger representation. Passengers have deep experiential knowledge about what is needed on the line and how it is working. In line with the ethos ‘Nothing about us without us’, we would like a deeper level of passenger involvement, beyond just ‘engagement’. A supervisory board, involving regular South Eastern passengers as well as local authority representatives, would truly ‘put the passenger at the heart of the railway’, in the words of various transport ministers.
    [Show full text]