Hymenoptera: Apoidea)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hymenoptera: Apoidea) Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All PIRU Publications Pollinating Insects Research Unit 7-24-2017 Survey of Hatching Spines of Bee Larvae Including Those of Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) Jerome G. Rozen Jr. American Museum of Natural History Corey Shepard Smith American Museum of Natural History James H. Cane Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/piru_pubs Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Rozen, Jerome G. Jr.; Smith, Corey Shepard; and Cane, James H., "Survey of Hatching Spines of Bee Larvae Including Those of Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)" (2017). All PIRU Publications. Paper 795. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/piru_pubs/795 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Pollinating Insects Research Unit at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All PIRU Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of Insect Science (2017) 17(4): 89; 1–10 doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iex060 Research article Survey of Hatching Spines of Bee Larvae Including Those of Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) Jerome G. Rozen, Jr., 1,2 Corey Shepard Smith,1 and James H. Cane3 1Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th St., New York, NY 10024 ([email protected], [email protected]), 2Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected], and 3USDA–ARS Bee Biology and Sytematics Laboratory, Pollinating Insect Research Unit, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-5310 ([email protected]) Subject Editor: Sean ODonnell Received 24 March 2017; Editorial decision 9 June 2017 Abstract This article explores the occurrence of hatching spines among bee taxa and how these structures enable a larva on hatching to extricate itself from the egg chorion. These spines, arranged in a linear sequence along the sides of the first instar just dorsal to the spiracles, have been observed and recorded in certain groups of solitary and cleptoparasitic bee taxa. After eclosion, the first instar remains loosely covered by the egg chorion. The fact that this form of eclosion has been detected in five families (Table 1 identifies four of the families. The fifth family is the Andrenidae for which the presence of hatching spines in the Oxaeinae will soon be announced.) of bees invites speculation as to whether it is a fundamental characteristic of bees, or at least of solitary and some clep- toparasitic bees. The wide occurrence of these spines has prompted the authors to explore and discover their presence in the highly eusocial Apis mellifera L. Hatching spines were indeed discovered on first instar A. melli- fera. The honey bee hatching process appears to differ in that the spines are displayed somewhat differently though still along the sides of the body, and the chorion, instead of splitting along the sides of the elongate egg, seems to quickly disintegrate from the emerging first instar in association with the nearly simultaneous removal of the serosa that covers and separates the first instar from the chorion. Unexpected observations of spherical bodies of various sizes perhaps containing dissolving enzymes being discharged from spiracular openings dur- ing hatching may shed future light on the process of how A. mellifera effects chorion removal during eclosion. Whereas hatching spines occur among many groups of bees, they appear to be entirely absent in the Nomadinae and parasitic Apinae, an indication of a different eclosion process. Key words: hatching spine, eclosion, bee, Apis mellifera The term “hatching spine” was used by Wigglesworth (1947) for a Methods variety of cuticular structures sometimes found on the embryonic All SEM micrographs were captured using a Hitachi S5700 in the cuticle or other times on the cuticle of the first instars of insects, Microscopy and Imaging Facility of the American Museum of which are used to cut through the embryonic cuticle or chorion at Natural History. All figures (except for Figs. 4–6) are SEM micro- the time of hatching from the egg. Sometimes termed “egg bursters,” graphs of A. mellifera, oriented with anterior ends toward the left. they have been observed in many groups of insects but, until re- Larval specimens had been preserved and stored in Kahle’s Solution cently, have gone unnoticed by melittologists. The purpose of this [acetic acid (glacial) 10%; formalin 10%; water 25%, ethyl alcohol article is to point out that hatching spines in the form of very small (74%) 55%]. spicules are widely dispersed among bee taxa and, furthermore, ap- pear to be a signature marker of the identity of a first larval instar for many (but not all) taxa, often necessary for distinguishing first Hatching Spines of Solitary and Cleptoparasitic Bees instars from later stages. Table 1 is a taxonomically arranged survey of the literature dealing This study is presented in three parts: (1) a survey of hatching with larval eclosion among solitary and cleptoparasitic bees. Among spines and hatching processes in solitary and cleptoparasitic bees, first instars of solitary and some cleptoparasitic bees (i.e., nonsocial (2) an investigation of hatching spines in first larval instars of the bees), hatching spines appear as a row of sharp-pointed, minute spi- highly eusocial bee, Apis mellifera, and (3) an investigation into the cules that extend along both sides of the body just above the spi- egg hatching process of species of Apidae the first instar of which do racles of the first instar. In most cases they are a narrow, not exhibit hatching spines. continuous, linear row of spicules on the surface of each segment VC The Authors 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. 1 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unre- stricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jinsectscience/article-abstract/17/4/89/3966742 by Materials Acquisitions Dept., University Libraries user on 07 November 2017 2 Journal of Insect Science, 2017, Vol. 17, No. 4 Fig. 1. Apis mellifera egg that had accidently been broken while being mounted on SEM stub, so that chorion above) had been torn off exposing, in lateral view, anterior end to left, the embryo covered by a thin, transparent, cuticular-like serosa amnion (not visible) covered by a fibrous layer revealing the head shape and segmentation of the first instar. Fig. 2. Close-up of anterior end of the chorion clearly revealing reticulated surface pattern. Fig. 3. Surface of fibrous layer in the vicinity of spiracle (arrow) on third thoracic segment in association with apices of hatching spines. Fig. 4. Close-up of rectangle in Fig. 3, showing fibers clinging to spines as well as to invisible serosa. above but close to the spiracular line. Because of their small size, they are rarely identifiable when viewed by stereomicroscope, prob- ably accounting for their being overlooked by numerous researchers studying late embryogenesis and eclosion. Further, they may be ob- scure because the widespread practice of immersing hatching eggs in paraffin oil for microscopic observation tends to render the spines transparent (DuPraw 1963). The presence of hatching spines in bees was initially detected in Tetrapedia diversipes Klug (Apidae: Tetrapediini) by Alves-dos- Santos et al. (2002: p. 28) as “a linear row of granules” along the two sides of the body of a hatching larva. The authors concluded that the first larval instar was pharate within the chorion before the chorion ruptured above the spiracular line. No function was ascribed to the “granules”. Instead, it was hypothesized that the rup- turing resulted solely from increase in body size caused by ingestion of amniotic fluid. The chorion was shed with the first instar exuviae, Fig. 5. First instar still covered by serosa showing position of spiracles and allowing the recognition of the second instar, which was actively small quantity of chorion on thorax and head, lateral view. Position of abdom- feeding. inal spiracles 1, 2, and 3 circled on micrograph. Distribution of hatching spines not visible because obscured by serosa. Four years later, most of the same authors used SEM to examine egg hatching of Monoeca haemorrhoidalis (Smith) and related taxa (Apidae: Tapinotaspidini) (Rozen et al. 2006: Figs. 14 and 15). They split along this line not only in M. haemorrhoidalis but in many determined that the “granules” above the spiracular line were in fact groups of solitary and cleptoparasitic bees (see Table 1). This ex- extremely small, sharp-pointed spicules. Furthermore, when food planation accords with a good many observations of lateral chorion provisions were colored with dye, the pharate first instar was seen to splitting among a range of taxa by various authors. Good illustra- ingest not only amniotic fluid but also liquid from the surface of the tions of the hatching process in a solitary bee can be found in Rozen provisions possibly through the micropylar opening on the chorion. et al. (2011: Figs. 15–20) for Centris flavofasciata Friese. See Table Because of the spicules’ stout bases, sharply pointed apices, and their 1 for references to solitary and cleptoparasitic bees exhibiting fea- position just above the spiracular line, the authors at first thought tures of this eclosion process. While we first thought that hatching that the spicules may be a tearing mechanism causing the chorion to spines alone were responsible for a mechanical splitting along the Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jinsectscience/article-abstract/17/4/89/3966742 by Materials Acquisitions Dept., University Libraries user on 07 November 2017 Journal of Insect Science, 2017, Vol.
Recommended publications
  • Xhaie'ican%Mllsllm
    XhAie'ican1ox4tate%Mllsllm PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK 24, N.Y. NUMBER 2 244 MAY I9, I 966 The Larvae of the Anthophoridae (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) Part 2. The Nomadinae BY JEROME G. ROZEN, JR.1 The present paper is the second of a series that treats the phylogeny and taxonomy of the larvae belonging to the bee family Anthophoridae. The first (Rozen, 1965a) dealt with the pollen-collecting tribes Eucerini and Centridini of the Anthophorinae. The present study encompasses the following tribes, all of which consist solely of cuckoo bees: Protepeolini, Epeolini, Nomadini, Ammobatini, Holcopasitini, Biastini, and Neolarrini. For reasons presented below, these tribes are believed to represent a monophyletic group, and consequently all are placed in the Nomadinae. It seems likely that the cleptoparasitic tribes Caenoprosopini, Ammoba- toidini, Townsendiellini, Epeoloidini, and Osirini are also members of the subfamily, although their larvae have not as yet been collected. Although the interrelationships of the numerous taxa within the Nomadinae need to be re-evaluated, the tribal concepts used by Michener (1944) are employed here. Adjustments in the classifications will certainly have to be made in the future, however, for Michener (1954) has already indicated, for example, that characters of the adults in the Osirini, the Epeolini, and the Nomadini intergrade. The affinities of the Nomadinae with the other subfamilies of the Antho- phoridae will be discussed in the last paper of the series. Because of char- 1 Curator, Department of Entomology, the American Museum of Natural History. 2 AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of the Ammobatini and Revision of the Afrotropical Genera (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae: Nomadinae)
    PHYLOGENY OF THE AMMOBATINI AND REVISION OF THE AFROTROPICAL GENERA (HYMENOPTERA: ANTHOPHORIDAE: NOMADINAE) by CONNAL DESMOND EARDLEY Submitted in fulfilment of the academic requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Zoology and Entomology University of Natal Pietermaritzburg 1994 ABSTRACT The phylogeny of the Ammobatini was studied, with regard to the principles of cladistics using parsimony, and the classification is revised. It is concluded that the tribe fonns a monophyletic group that comprises six distinct monophyletic genera: Pasite Jurine, Sphecodopsis Bischoff, Ammobates Latreille, Me/anempis Saussure, Spilwpasites Warncke and Oreopasites Cockerell, of which Pasites, Sphecodopsis, Ammobates and MeLanempis occur in the Afrotropical Region. The Afrotropical species of these four genera are revised. Pseudopasites Bischoff and Pseudodichroa Bischoff are synonymized with Sphecodopsis. Pasites includes 17 Afrotropical species, Sphecodopsis 10 species, and Ammobates and MeLanempis are each known from a single Afrotropical species. Ten new species are described: Pa..~ites nilssoni, P. paulyi, P. humecta, P. glwma, P. namibiensis, P. somaLica, Sphecodopsis vespericena, S. longipygidium, S. namaquensis and Ammobates auster. Thirty-three names are synonymized: they are P. nigerrima (Friese), P. argentata (Baker) (= P. barkeri (Cockereil»; P. chubbi Cockerell, P. nigritula Bischoff, P. peratra Cockerell (= P. atra Friese); P. nigripes (Friese), P. fortis Cockerell, P. subfortis Cockerell, P. stordyi Cockerell, P. voiensis Cockerell, P. aitior Cockerell (= P. carnifex (Gerstaecker»; P. Ilataiensis (Cockerell), P. aiboguttatus (Friese), P. ogiiviei (Cockerell) (= P. jenseni (Friese»; P. alivalensis (Cockerell), P. rufitarsis (Cockerell) (= P. histrio (Gerstaecker»; P. marshaUi (Cockerell) (= P. jonesi (Cockerell»; P. abessinica (Friese), P. fulviventris (Bischoff), P. rhodesialla (Bischoff), P. apicalis (Bischoff), P.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.CLEPTOPARASITE BEES, with EMPHASIS on THE
    Acta Biológica Colombiana ISSN: 0120-548X [email protected] Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Bogotá Colombia ALVES-DOS-SANTOS, ISABEL CLEPTOPARASITE BEES, WITH EMPHASIS ON THE OILBEES HOSTS Acta Biológica Colombiana, vol. 14, núm. 2, 2009, pp. 107-113 Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Bogotá Bogotá, Colombia Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=319027883009 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Acta biol. Colomb., Vol. 14 No. 2, 2009 107 - 114 CLEPTOPARASITE BEES, WITH EMPHASIS ON THE OILBEES HOSTS Abejas cleptoparásitas, con énfasis en las abejas hospederas coletoras de aceite ISABEL ALVES-DOS-SANTOS1, Ph. D. 1Departamento de Ecologia, IBUSP. Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão 321, trav 14. São Paulo 05508-900 Brazil. [email protected] Presentado 1 de noviembre de 2008, aceptado 1 de febrero de 2009, correcciones 7 de julio de 2009. ABSTRACT Cleptoparasite bees lay their eggs inside nests constructed by other bee species and the larvae feed on pollen provided by the host, in this case, solitary bees. The cleptoparasite (adult and larvae) show many morphological and behavior adaptations to this life style. In this paper I present some data on the cleptoparasite bees whose hosts are bees specialized to collect floral oil. Key words: solitary bee, interspecific interaction, parasitic strategies, hospicidal larvae. RESUMEN Las abejas Cleptoparásitas depositan sus huevos en nidos construídos por otras especies de abejas y las larvas se alimentan del polen que proveen las hospederas, en este caso, abejas solitarias.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera, Apidae, Biastini)
    JHR 69: 23–37 (2019)Monotypic no more – a new species of the unusual genus Schwarzia... 23 doi: 10.3897/jhr.69.32966 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://jhr.pensoft.net Monotypic no more – a new species of the unusual genus Schwarzia (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Biastini) Silas Bossert1,2 1 Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA 2 Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560, USA Corresponding author: Silas Bossert ([email protected]) Academic editor: Michael Ohl | Received 10 January 2019 | Accepted 21 March 2019 | Published 30 April 2019 http://zoobank.org/F30BBBB6-7C9C-44F0-A1C6-531C1521D3EC Citation: Bossert S (2019) Monotypic no more – a new species of the unusual genus Schwarzia (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Biastini). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 69: 23–37. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.69.32966 Abstract Schwarzia elizabethae Bossert, sp. n., a previously unknown species of the enigmatic cleptoparasitic genus Schwarzia Eardley, 2009 is described. Both sexes are illustrated and compared to the type species of the genus, Schwarzia emmae Eardley, 2009. The male habitus of S. emmae is illustrated and potential hosts of Schwarzia are discussed. Unusual morphological features of Schwarzia are examined in light of the pre- sumably close phylogenetic relationship to other Biastini. The new species represents the second species of Biastini outside the Holarctic region. Keywords Bees, cleptoparasitism, East Africa Introduction Biastini (Apidae, Nomadinae) is a small tribe of cleptoparasitic bees with just 13 de- scribed species in four genera (Ascher and Pickering 2019). Their distribution is pri- marily Holarctic. Biastes Panzer, 1806 is Palearctic and has five described species.
    [Show full text]
  • Noqvitatesamerican MUSEUM PUBLISHED by the AMERICAN MUSEUM of NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST at 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, N.Y
    NoqvitatesAMERICAN MUSEUM PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, N.Y. 10024 Number 3066, 28 pp., 45 figures June 11, 1993 Nesting Biologies and Immature Stages of the Rophitine Bees (Halictidae) with Notes on the Cleptoparasite Biastes (Anthophoridae) (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) JEROME G. ROZEN, JR.' CONTENTS Abstract .......................... 2 Introduction .......................... 2 Nesting Biology of the Rophitinae .......................... 3 Sphecodosoma dicksoni .......................... 3 Conanthalictus conanthi .......................... 11 Rophites trispinosus .......................... 15 Profile of the Biology of the Rophitinae .......................... 16 Mature Larvae of the Rophitinae .......................... 17 Key to the Mature Larvae .......................... 18 Sphecodosoma dicksoni .......................... 18 Conanthalictus conanthi .......................... 21 Rophites trispinosus .......................... 23 Pupa of Sphecodosoma dicksoni .......................... 24 Discussion .......................... 24 References .......................... 26 lCurator, Department of Entomology, American Museum of Natural History. Copyright C American Museum of Natural History 1993 ISSN 0003-0082 / Price $2.90 2 AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES NO. 3066 ABSTRACT Information on the nesting biology ofthe ground- The mature larvae of the Rophitinae are char- nesting Sphecodosoma dicksoni (Timberlake) and acterized on the basis of six genera, and a key to Conanthalictus conanthi
    [Show full text]
  • Novitatesamerican MUSEUM PUBLISHED by the AMERICAN MUSEUM of NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST at 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, N.Y
    NovitatesAMERICAN MUSEUM PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, N.Y. 10024 Number 3029, 36 pp., 67 figures, 3 tables November 27, 1991 Evolution of Cleptoparasitism in Anthophorid Bees as Revealed by Their Mode of Parasitism and First Instars (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) JEROME G. ROZEN, JR.1 CONTENTS Abstract .............................................. 2 Introduction .............................................. 2 Acknowledgments ............... ............................... 3 Historical Background ................ .............................. 4 Evolution of Cleptoparasitism in the Anthophoridae ............. ................... 6 Systematics of Cleptoparasitic First-Instar Anthophoridae ......... ................. 12 Methods .............................................. 12 Description of the Nomadinae Based on First Instars .......... .................. 13 Description of the Protepeolini Based on the First Instar ......... ................ 13 Description of the Melectini Based on First Instars ............ .................. 17 Xeromelecta (Melectomorpha) californica (Cresson) ........... ................. 17 Melecta separata callura (Cockerell) ......................................... 20 Melecta pacifica fulvida Cresson ............................................. 20 Thyreus lieftincki Rozen .............................................. 22 Zacosmia maculata (Cresson) ............................................. 22 Description of the Rhathymini Based on First Instars .........
    [Show full text]
  • Specialization in Plant–Pollinator Networks
    Villalobos et al. BMC Ecol (2019) 19:34 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-019-0250-z BMC Ecology RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Specialization in plant–pollinator networks: insights from local-scale interactions in Glenbow Ranch Provincial Park in Alberta, Canada Soraya Villalobos1* , José Manuel Sevenello‑Montagner2 and Jana C. Vamosi1 Abstract Background: The occurrence and frequency of plant–pollinator interactions are acknowledged to be a function of multiple factors, including the spatio‑temporal distribution of species. The study of pollination specialization by exam‑ ining network properties and more recently incorporating predictors of pairwise interactions is emerging as a useful framework, yet integrated datasets combining network structure, habitat disturbance, and phylogenetic information are still scarce. Results: We found that plant–pollinator interactions in a grassland ecosystem in the foothills of the Rocky Mountains are not randomly distributed and that high levels of reciprocal specialization are generated by biological constraints, such as foral symmetry, pollinator size and pollinator sociality, because these traits lead to morphological or pheno‑ logical mismatching between interacting species. We also detected that landscape degradation was associated with diferences in the network topology, but the interaction webs still maintained a consistently higher number of recip‑ rocal specialization cases than expected. Evidence for the reciprocal evolutionary dependence in visitors (e.g., related pollinators visiting related plants) were weak in this study system, however we identifed key species joining clustered units. Conclusions: Our results indicate that the conserved links with keystone species may provide the foundation for generating local reciprocal specialization. From the general topology of the networks, plant–pollinators interactions in sites with disturbance consisted of generalized nodes connecting modules (i.e., hub and numerous connectors).
    [Show full text]
  • The Very Handy Bee Manual
    The Very Handy Manual: How to Catch and Identify Bees and Manage a Collection A Collective and Ongoing Effort by Those Who Love to Study Bees in North America Last Revised: October, 2010 This manual is a compilation of the wisdom and experience of many individuals, some of whom are directly acknowledged here and others not. We thank all of you. The bulk of the text was compiled by Sam Droege at the USGS Native Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab over several years from 2004-2008. We regularly update the manual with new information, so, if you have a new technique, some additional ideas for sections, corrections or additions, we would like to hear from you. Please email those to Sam Droege ([email protected]). You can also email Sam if you are interested in joining the group’s discussion group on bee monitoring and identification. Many thanks to Dave and Janice Green, Tracy Zarrillo, and Liz Sellers for their many hours of editing this manual. "They've got this steamroller going, and they won't stop until there's nobody fishing. What are they going to do then, save some bees?" - Mike Russo (Massachusetts fisherman who has fished cod for 18 years, on environmentalists)-Provided by Matthew Shepherd Contents Where to Find Bees ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Nets ............................................................................................................................................................. 2 Netting Technique ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Melittology No
    Journal of Melitology Bee Biology, Ecology, Evolution, & Systematics The latest buzz in bee biology No. 94, pp. 1–3 26 February 2020 BRIEF COMMUNICATION An overlooked family-group name among bees: Availability of Coelioxoidini (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Michael S. Engel1,2, Victor H. Gonzalez3, & Claus Rasmussen4 Abstract. Recent phylogenetic analysis of the family Apidae has applied the tribal name Co- elioxoidini to the distinctive genus Coelioxoides Cresson, which has been thought to be related to Tetrapedia Klug. However, the nomenclatural status of such a family-group name has not yet been assessed. Herein, we determine that this family-group name is available and discuss its authorship and proposal date. INTRODUCTION The genus Coelioxoides Cresson includes four rather wasp-like cuckoo bees (Fig. 1) that has historically been considered a close relative of their hosts in the genus Tet- rapedia Klug (Roig-Alsina, 1990; Michener, 2007). More recently, the genus has been suggested to be related to other cleptoparasitic bees, and distant from Tetrapediini (Martins et al., 2018; Bossert et al., 2019), and each has employed the tribal name Co- elioxoidini to accommodate the genus. The availability of a family-group name based on the type genus Coelioxoides was questioned by Rocha-Filho et al. (2017), who wrote, “no taxonomic study has been performed in order to assign Coelioxoides to a distinct tribe as its type genus.” Indeed, a family-group name formed from Coelioxoides was not mentioned in any of the recent 1 Division of Entomology, Natural History Museum, and Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, 1501 Crestline Drive – Suite 140, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045-4415, USA ([email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • A Supermatrix Approach to Apoid Phylogeny and Biogeography Shannon M Hedtke1*, Sébastien Patiny2 and Bryan N Danforth1
    Hedtke et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:138 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/138 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access The bee tree of life: a supermatrix approach to apoid phylogeny and biogeography Shannon M Hedtke1*, Sébastien Patiny2 and Bryan N Danforth1 Abstract Background: Bees are the primary pollinators of angiosperms throughout the world. There are more than 16,000 described species, with broad variation in life history traits such as nesting habitat, diet, and social behavior. Despite their importance as pollinators, the evolution of bee biodiversity is understudied: relationships among the seven families of bees remain controversial, and no empirical global-level reconstruction of historical biogeography has been attempted. Morphological studies have generally suggested that the phylogeny of bees is rooted near the family Colletidae, whereas many molecular studies have suggested a root node near (or within) Melittidae. Previous molecular studies have focused on a relatively small sample of taxa (~150 species) and genes (seven at most). Public databases contain an enormous amount of DNA sequence data that has not been comprehensively analysed in the context of bee evolution. Results: We downloaded, aligned, concatenated, and analysed all available protein-coding nuclear gene DNA sequence data in GenBank as of October, 2011. Our matrix consists of 20 genes, with over 17,000 aligned nucleotide sites, for over 1,300 bee and apoid wasp species, representing over two-thirds of bee genera. Whereas the matrix is large in terms of number of genes and taxa, there is a significant amount of missing data: only ~15% of the matrix is populated with data.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Classification of the Parasitic Bee Tribe Epeolini (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Nomadinae)^
    Ac Scientific Papers Natural History Museum The University of Kansas 06 October 2004 Number 33:1-51 Phylogeny and classification of the parasitic bee tribe Epeolini (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Nomadinae)^ By Molly G. Rightmyer y\CZ Division of E)itoiiiologi/, Nntuinl History Museiiui mid Biodizvrsity Rcsenrch Center, jV^Ar^^ and Eiitomology Progrniii, Department of Ecology nnd Evolutionary Biology, The Unii>ersity of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 66045-7523 CONTENTS ^AB'"^^?Sy ABSTRACT 2 lJHIVE^^^ ' INTRODUCTION 2 Acknowledgments 2 HISTORICAL REVIEW 3 METHODS AND MATERIALS 5 MORPHOLOGY 7 PsEUDOPYGiDiAL Area 7 Sting Apparatus 7 Male Internal Sclerites 11 PHYLOGENETIC RESULTS 11 SYSTEMATICS 13 Tribe Epeolini Robertson 13 Subtribe Odyneropsina Handlirsch new status 14 Genus Odyneropsis Schrottky 14 Subgenus Odyneropsis Schrottky new status 15 Subgenus Parammobates Friese new status 15 Rhogepeolina new subtribe 15 Genus Rhogepeolus Moure 15 Rhogepeolina + (Epeolina + Thalestriina) 16 Epeolina + Thalestriina 16 Subtribe Epeolina Robertson new status 16 Genus Epeolus Latreille 16 'Contribution No. 3397 of the Division of Entomology, Natural History Museum and Biodiversity Research Center, University of Kansas. Natural ISSN No. 1094-0782 © History Museum, The University of Kansas _ . «i„,, I <*»ro»V Ernst K'ayr Li^^rary Zoology Museum of Comparawe Harvard University Ac Scientific Papers Natural History Museum The University of Kansas 06 October 2004 NumLx-r 33:1-51 Phylogeny and classification of the parasitic bee tribe Epeolini (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Nomadinae)'
    [Show full text]
  • Scenarios for Pollinator Habitat at Denver International Airport
    Scenarios for Pollinator Habitat at Denver International Airport by Tiantong Gu (Landscape Architecture) Xuan Jin (Landscape Architecture) Jiayang Li (Landscape Architecture) Annemarie McDonald (Conservation Ecology) Chang Ni (Conservation Ecology) Client: Sasaki Adviser: Professor Joan Nassauer Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degrees of Master of Landscape Architecture and Master of Natural Resources and Environment at the University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability April 17th 2018 Acknowledgments We would like to thank our adviser, Joan Nassauer, for her patience and thoughtful advice throughout the course of this project. We would also like to thank Tao Zhang, our client liaison, for his critiques and suggestions. We are grateful to the staff at the Rocky Mountain Arsenal National Wildlife Refuge, especially Tom Wall, and the Applewood Seed Company for their assistance in the planting designs in this project. Funding for our project was provided by University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability. Finally, we would like to thank all of our families for their support and encouragement during this process. Table of Contents Contents Habitat Corridor Scenarios 71 Scenario Performance Hypothesis 71 Abstract 7 Development Pattern 80 Landscape Element Typologies 82 Introduction 8 Reserach Goals 12 Scenario Assessment 87 InVEST Crop Pollination Model 87 Literature Review 13 Pollinator Guild Table 87 The Shortgrass Prairie Ecosystem 13 Biophysical Table 89 Airport Impacts on
    [Show full text]