Children's Environmental Health: Risks and Remedies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Children's Environmental Health: Risks and Remedies Making the Link POPULATION REFERENCE BUREAU CHILDREN’S ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH: RISKS AND REMEDIES by Liz Creel verall child mortality declined signifi- cantly in the 1990s, but environmental hazards still kill at least 3 million children O 1 under age 5 every year. Such young children make up roughly 10 percent of the world’s popu- lation, but comprise more than 40 percent of the population suffering from health problems related Photo removed for to the environment.2 Children worldwide require copyright reasons. special protection from longstanding risks such as smoke from traditional fuels and from emerging risks such as exposure to an increasing number of hazardous chemicals. Although new regulatory standards and greater awareness of children’s vulnerability to such hazards have improved children’s situation in a number of more developed countries, many children, especially in less developed countries, continue to be exposed to toxins. Their vulnera- Children are vulnerable to a variety of environmental hazards, and may absorb toxins from the air, food, bility is exacerbated by the lack of protective poli- water, and soil. cies and medical and public health interventions. Short-term curative responses can save some lives, but addressing underlying risk factors is key for long-term change. Efforts to measure children’s 20 percent of deaths worldwide in children under environmental health risks, develop policies and age 5.4 Furthermore, fetal exposure to chemicals programs to mitigate such exposures worldwide, such as lead increases a child’s chances of having and strengthen efforts to address the problem at brain damage or developmental problems. all levels are needed. This policy brief, part of Children at all ages, not just the very young, PRB’s Emerging Policy Issues in Population, are at greater risk than adults. Children under Health, and Environment series, explores chil- age 5 breathe more air, drink more water, and eat dren’s special vulnerability, outlines the risks and the more food per unit of body weight than adults conditions that increase such risks, and highlights do, so they may experience higher rates of expo- what is being done to address the problem. sure to pathogens and pollutants. Typical child- hood behaviors, such as crawling and putting Children’s Vulnerability objects in the mouth, can also lead to increased Due to their size, physiology, and behavior, risks. Children between ages 5 and 18 may face children are more vulnerable than adults to envi- higher risks of injuries, including exposure to ronmental hazards. Children are more heavily hazardous chemicals, due to their growing partic- exposed to toxins in proportion to their body ipation in household chores and work outside of weight, and have more years of life ahead of them the home. Many school-age children attend in which they may suffer long-term effects from schools without sanitation facilities, making early exposure.3 Perinatal conditions, which can them more likely to contract various diseases and be influenced by environmental conditions, cause less likely to go to school. According to 2 PRB Making the Link 2002 UNICEF, about 10 percent of school-age African cent every 10 years since 1980; urbanization and girls either do not attend school during menstru- increased time spent indoors are strongly associ- ation or drop out at puberty because of the lack ated with this increase.12 According to WHO, of sanitary facilities.5 prevalence of asthma symptoms in children in Brazil, Costa Rica, Panama, Peru, and Uruguay Environmental Risks to varies from 20 percent to 30 percent; in Kenya, it Children’s Health approaches 20 percent.13 Indoor Air Pollution The strongest risk factors for development of Half of the world’s households use biomass fuels, asthma appear to be exposure to indoor allergens including wood, animal dung, or crop residues, and a family history of asthma or allergies. that produce particulates, carbon monoxide, and Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS, other indoor pollutants. The World Health or secondhand smoke), chemical irritants, air pol- Organization (WHO) has determined that as lutants, and cold weather are also risk factors for many as 1 billion people, mostly women and the disease, as are low birth weight, respiratory children, are regularly exposed to levels of indoor infections, and physical exercise. Children whose air pollution that are up to 100 times those con- mothers smoke have 70 percent more respiratory sidered acceptable.6 Young children, who spend problems and middle-ear infections than children more time indoors, are more exposed to the nox- of nonsmokers. Studies show that asthmatic chil- ious byproducts of cooking and heating. In India, dren’s condition is significantly likely to be wors- where 80 percent of households use biomass fuel, ened by ETS.14 estimates show that nearly 500,000 women and children under age 5 die every year from indoor Outdoor Air Pollution pollution, largely from acute respiratory infec- Data suggest that over 60 percent of the diseases tions (ARIs).7 The figure for other less developed associated with respiratory infections are linked countries is similar.8 to exposure to air pollution.15 Outdoor pollutants Exposure to indoor pollutants can cause or such as sulfur dioxide, ozone, nitrogen oxide, car- aggravate ARIs, including upper respiratory infec- bon monoxide, and volatile organic compounds tions such as colds and sore throats, and lower come mainly from motor vehicle exhaust, power respiratory infections such as pneumonia. Acute plant emissions, open burning of solid waste, and lower respiratory infections are one of the primary construction and related activities. According to causes of child mortality in developing countries, one report, children in cities with populations and led to 2.2 million deaths in children under greater than 10 million are exposed to levels of age 5 in 2001.9 ARIs can also increase mortality air pollution two times to eight times higher than from measles, malaria, and other diseases. Other the level WHO considers acceptable.16 In Mexico factors that can worsen ARIs include low birth City, pollution levels are well above WHO’s weight, poor nutrition, inadequate housing and limits of 90 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3) poor hygiene conditions, overcrowding, and for particulates and 50 µg/m3 for sulfur dioxide reduced access to health care. and nitrogen dioxide (see Figure 1).17 Asthma Unsafe Drinking Water and Poor Sanitation Studies in less developed countries have linked Contaminated water and inadequate sanitation indoor air pollution to lung cancer, stillbirths, cause a range of diseases, many of which are low birth weight, heart ailments, and chronic life-threatening. The most deadly are diarrheal respiratory diseases, including asthma.10 Asthma, diseases, 80 percent to 90 percent of which a disease characterized by recurrent attacks of result from environmental factors. In 2001, breathlessness and wheezing, affects between diarrheal infections caused nearly 2 million 100 million and 150 million people worldwide. deaths in children under age 5, primarily due The disease causes over 180,000 deaths every to dehydration; many more children suffer from year, including 25,000 children’s deaths.11 nonfatal diarrhea that leaves them underweight, Worldwide rates of asthma have risen by 50 per- physically stunted, vulnerable to disease, and PRB Making the Link 2002 3 Figure 1 Pollution Levels in Selected Cities Micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3) Total suspended particulates (1995) 279 Sulfur dioxide (1998) Nitrogen dioxide (1998) 240 223 130 WHO limit on total suspended particulates (90 µg/m3) 74 68 WHO limits on total sulfur dioxide 49 50 39 and nitrogen dioxide (50 µg/m3) 26 33 18 23 18 11 Mexico City Tokyo Bangkok Berlin Mumbai (Bombay) NOTE: WHO limits for nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide are 50 µg/m3 for each type of pollutant. SOURCE: World Bank, World Development Indicators 2002. drained of energy.18 Poor sanitation conditions contributes to low birth weight, one of the lead- and inadequate personal, household, and ing risk factors for infant mortality, because community hygiene are responsible for most pregnant women are more susceptible to both diarrheal infections.19 malaria and anemia.23 Despite significant investments in improving The prevalence of malaria is strongly related water supplies and sanitation over the last 20 to environmental factors such as irrigation and years, about 18 percent of the world’s population other agricultural practices, land clearing, and still lacks access to safe drinking water, and nearly changing demographic patterns. Higher tempera- 40 percent have no access to sanitation.20 At pres- tures, heavier rainfall, and other changes in cli- ent, people in rural areas are the most affected, mate, as well as deforestation, increase the risk of although continual urbanization means that malaria and related epidemics.24 increasing numbers of people live in densely populated cities, where they face shortages of Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals potable water supplies and sanitation systems, As countries pursue economic development, the as well as growing pollution. More than 1 billion increased risk of exposure to chemical hazards people, mostly in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, may worsen other risks to children’s health, such currently live in slums or as squatters.21 as unsafe water and poor hygiene. Industrializa- tion and modernized agriculture have many Infectious Disease Vectors benefits, but they have often been accompanied Vector-borne diseases, such as malaria, represent by problems, such as exposure to pesticides, that an international public health problem, particu- disproportionately affect children. Other poten- larly in tropical areas of Africa, Asia, and Latin tial toxins include lead discharged from battery- America. Approximately 1 million children under recycling operations; mercury in fish; and age 5 in sub-Saharan Africa die of malaria each nitrates, arsenic, and fluoride in drinking water. year; malaria causes about 25 percent of all In many countries, children are exposed deaths among children in the region, especially to toxic chemicals in the workplace.
Recommended publications
  • Understanding Lead Uptake and Effects Across Species Lines: a Conservation Medicine Based Approach
    UNDERSTANDING LEAD UPTAKE AND EFFECTS ACROSS SPECIES LINES: A CONSERVATION MEDICINE BASED APPROACH MARK A. POKRAS AND MICHELLE R. KNEELAND Center for Conservation Medicine, Tufts University Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, 200 Westboro Rd., North Grafton, MA 01536, USA. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT.—Conservation medicine examines the linkages among the health of people, animals and the environment. Few issues illustrate this approach better than an examination of lead (Pb) toxicity. We briefly review the current state of knowledge on the toxicity of lead and its effects on wildlife, humans, and domestic animals. Lead is cheap and there is a long tradition of its use. But the toxic effects of Pb have also been recognized for centuries. As a result, western societies have greatly reduced many traditional uses of Pb, including many paints, gasoline and solders because of threats to the health of humans and the environment. Legisla- tion in several countries has eliminated the use of lead shot for hunting waterfowl. Despite these advances, a great many Pb products continue to be readily available. Conservationists recognize that hunting, angling and shooting sports deposit thousands of tons of Pb into the environment each year. Because of our concerns for human health and over 100 years of focused research, we know the most about lead poisoning in people. Even today, our knowledge of the long-term sublethal effects of Pb on human health continues to grow dramatically. Our knowledge about lead poisoning in domestic animals is signifi- cantly less. For wild animals, our understanding of lead poisoning is roughly where our knowledge about humans was in the mid-1800s when Tanquerel Des Planches made his famous medical observations (Tan- querel Des Planches 1850).
    [Show full text]
  • 10Neurodevelopmental Effects of Childhood Exposure to Heavy
    Neurodevelopmental E¤ects of Childhood Exposure to Heavy Metals: 10 Lessons from Pediatric Lead Poisoning Theodore I. Lidsky, Agnes T. Heaney, Jay S. Schneider, and John F. Rosen Increasing industrialization has led to increased exposure to neurotoxic metals. By far the most heavily studied of these metals is lead, a neurotoxin that is particularly dangerous to the developing nervous system of children. Awareness that lead poison- ing poses a special risk for children dates back over 100 years, and there has been increasing research on the developmental e¤ects of this poison over the past 60 years. Despite this research and growing public awareness of the dangers of lead to chil- dren, government regulation has lagged scientific knowledge; legislation has been in- e¤ectual in critical areas, and many new cases of poisoning occur each year. Lead, however, is not the only neurotoxic metal that presents a danger to children. Several other heavy metals, such as mercury and manganese, are also neurotoxic, have adverse e¤ects on the developing brain, and can be encountered by children. Al- though these other neurotoxic metals have not been as heavily studied as lead, there has been important research describing their e¤ects on the brain. The purpose of the present chapter is to review the neurotoxicology of lead poisoning as well as what is known concerning the neurtoxicology of mercury and manganese. The purpose of this review is to provide information that might be of some help in avoiding repeti- tion of the mistakes that were made in attempting to protect children from the dan- gers of lead poisoning.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of LEAD POISONING in the WORLD Dr. Herbert L. Needleman Introduction the Center for Disease Control Classified the Cause
    HISTORY OF LEAD POISONING IN THE WORLD Dr. Herbert L. Needleman Introduction The Center for Disease Control classified the causes of disease and death as follows: 50 % due to unhealthy life styles 25 % due to environment 25% due to innate biology and 25% due to inadequate health care. Lead poisoning is an environmental disease, but it is also a disease of life style. Lead is one of the best-studied toxic substances, and as a result we know more about the adverse health effects of lead than virtually any other chemical. The health problems caused by lead have been well documented over a wide range of exposures on every continent. The advancements in technology have made it possible to research lead exposure down to very low levels approaching the limits of detection. We clearly know how it gets into the body and the harm it causes once it is ingested, and most importantly, how to prevent it! Using advanced technology, we can trace the evolution of lead into our environment and discover the health damage resulting from its exposure. Early History Lead is a normal constituent of the earth’s crust, with trace amounts found naturally in soil, plants, and water. If left undisturbed, lead is practically immobile. However, once mined and transformed into man-made products, which are dispersed throughout the environment, lead becomes highly toxic. Solely as a result of man’s actions, lead has become the most widely scattered toxic metal in the world. Unfortunately for people, lead has a long environmental persistence and never looses its toxic potential, if ingested.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Health Playbook: Investing in a Robust Environmental Health System Executive Summary
    Environmental Health Playbook: Investing in a Robust Environmental Health System Executive Summary Background and Need for Action Environmental Health is the branch of public health that focuses on the interrelationships between people and their environment, promotes human health and well-being, and fosters healthy and safe communities. As a fundamental component of a comprehensive public health system, environmental health works to advance policies and programs to reduce chemical and other environmental exposures in air, water, soil, and food to protect residents and provide communities with healthier environments. Environmental health protects the public by tracking environmental exposures in communities across the United States and potential links with disease outcomes. To achieve a healthy community, homes should be safe, affordable, and healthy places for families to gather. Workplaces, schools, and child care centers should be free of exposures that negatively impact the health of workers or children. Nutritious, affordable foods should be safe for all community members. Access to safe and affordable multimodal transportation options, including biking and public transit, improves the environment and drives down obesity and other chronic illnesses. Outdoor and indoor air quality in all communities should be healthy and safe to breathe for everyone. Children and adults alike should have access to safe and clean public spaces, such as parks. When a disaster strikes, a community needs to be prepared; it should have the tools and resources to be resilient against physical (infrastructure and human) and emotional damage. All these activities require the participation of federal, state, local, and tribal governments. Building a Robust Environmental Health System Investing in essential governmental environmental health services through dedicated resources will create an effective environmental health system that proactively protects communities and helps everyone attain good health.
    [Show full text]
  • Advancing Healthy Housing: a Strategy for Action Abbreviations
    healthyhomes.hud.gov Advancing Healthy Housing A STRATEGY FOR ACTION 2013 A Report from the Federal Healthy Homes Work Group Table of Contents Abbreviations __________________________________________________________________3 Executive Summary ________________________________________________________________4 Introduction __________________________________________________________________8 Advancing Healthy Housing Goals ___________________________________________________16 Goal 1 Establish Healthy Homes Recommendations _________________________________17 1.1 Establish Recommendations for Assessing Health and Safety Hazards ______17 Goal 2 Encourage Adoption of Healthy Homes Recommendations _____________________19 2.1 Obtain Commitments from Agencies to Advance Healthy Housing ________19 2.2 Strengthen Federal Efforts to Reduce Public Health Risks in Housing _______20 2.3 Explore Ways to Leverage Funding across Federal and Non-Federal Programs _______________________________________________21 Goal 3 Create and Support Training and Workforce Development to Address Health Hazards in Housing ______________________________________________________22 3.1 Support Enhanced Healthy Homes Training and Workforce Development __22 3.2 Accelerate Replication of Successful Local Healthy Housing Programs ______23 3.3 Encourage Pilots or Demonstration Programs that Advance Healthy Housing ____________________________________________23 Goal 4 Educate the Public about Healthy Homes ____________________________________24 4.1 Develop a Communications Strategy
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Threats to Children's Health in Southeast Asia and The
    Children’s Health Review Environmental Threats to Children’s Health in Southeast Asia and the Western Pacific William A. Suk,1 Kuhnying Mathuros Ruchirawat,2 Kalpana Balakrishnan,3 Martha Berger,4 David Carpenter,5 Terri Damstra,6 Jenny Pronczuk de Garbino,7 David Koh,8 Philip J. Landrigan,9 Irma Makalinao,10 Peter D. Sly,11 Y. Xu,12 and B.S. Zheng13 1Center for Risk and Integrated Sciences, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA; 2Chulabhorn Research Institute, Bangkok, Thailand; 3Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Porur, Chennai, India; 4Office of Children’s Health Protection, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA; 5School of Public Health, University at Albany, Rensselaer, New York, USA; 6World Health Organization, International Programme on Chemical Safety, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA; 7World Health Organization, International Programme on Chemical Safety, Geneva, Switzerland; 8National University of Singapore, Department of Community, Occupational and Family Medicine, Singapore; 9Center for Children’s Health and the Environment, Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA; 10Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of the Philippines College of Medicine, Manila, Philippines; 11Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Child Health Research, Subiaco, Washington, USA; 12Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China; 13Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang, People’s Republic of China chemicals. In recognition of these new threats, The Southeast Asia and Western Pacific regions contain half of the world’s children and are among the evaluation and management of risk to the most rapidly industrializing regions of the globe.
    [Show full text]
  • CDC's National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network
    CDC’s National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network Keeping Track, Promoting Health Key Features Closing the Gap • Standardized environment For decades, the United States has faced a gap in knowing how and health data across environmental contaminants affect people’s health. The Centers for Disease contributing states Control and Prevention (CDC) is working to close this gap by improving • Information by location surveillance through the Environmental Public Health Tracking Network • Easy to read maps, charts, and (Tracking Network). tables The Tracking Network is a dynamic Web-based tool that, for the first time, Health conditions on the provides health and environmental data in one easy to find location. Tracking Network: • Health professionals and researchers will have access to more and better • Asthma scientific data allowing them to learn more about health conditions • Birth defects related to the environment. • Cancer • Parents can learn about conditions such as asthma or the presence of • Carbon monoxide poisoning contaminants in the air where they live and take action to protect their children. • Childhood lead poisoning • Heart attacks • Elected officials can make more informed health policy decisions. For example, they can see their community’s air quality trends to determine • Population characteristics if actions taken to reduce pollution levels are working. • Reproductive and birth outcomes Using New and Existing Data Environmental data on the To lay the foundation for the national Tracking Network, CDC is funding Tracking Network: health departments in 23 states and New York City to build local tracking • Air quality related to ozone networks. and particulate matter (PM2.5) Each health department is building a local network to: • Climate change • Monitor environmental public health issues important in their • Community design communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Lead Poisoning
    3 Dec 2003 21:51 AR AR206-ME55-13.tex AR206-ME55-13.sgm LaTeX2e(2002/01/18) P1: GBC 10.1146/annurev.med.55.091902.103653 Annu. Rev. Med. 2004. 55:209–22 doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.55.091902.103653 Copyright c 2004 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved First published online as a Review in Advance on Aug. 18, 2003 LEAD POISONING Herbert Needleman Professor of Psychiatry and Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213; email: [email protected] ■ Abstract Understanding of lead toxicity has advanced substantially over the past three decades, and focus has shifted from high-dose effects in clinically symptomatic individuals to the consequences of exposure at lower doses that cause no symptoms, particularly in children and fetuses. The availability of more sensitive analytic methods has made it possible to measure lead at much lower concentrations. This advance, along with more refined epidemiological techniques and better outcome measures, has lowered the least observable effect level until it approaches zero. As a consequence, the segment of the population who are diagnosed with exposure to toxic levels has expanded. At the same time, environmental efforts, most importantly the removal of lead from gasoline, have dramatically reduced the amount of lead in the biosphere. The remaining major source of lead is older housing stock. Although the cost of lead paint abatement is measured in billions of dollars, the monetized benefits of such a Herculean task have been shown to far outweigh the costs. INTRODUCTION In recent years, the focus in lead poisoning has shifted away from adults exposed to high doses in industrial settings to the larger population of asymptomatic chil- dren with lesser exposures.
    [Show full text]
  • Lead Poisoning Investigative Guidelines
    Lead Poisoning 1. DISEASE REPORTING 1.1 Purpose of Reporting and Surveillance 1. To assess the magnitude of lead exposure in Oregon. 2. To identify all tested individuals with elevated blood lead levels (EBLL). 3. To identify the sources of lead exposure for individuals with EBLL and to identify, notify, and evaluate others who may be at risk from those sources. 4. To ensure that individuals with EBLL receive proper medical management, including follow-up, until their blood lead concentration drops to acceptable levels. 5. To ensure that adequate environmental follow-up occurs, to reduce or eliminate the risk of further lead exposure from identified sources for the affected child and any family members, playmates, etc. who could also be exposed to the same source. 6. For occupational exposures, to ensure that the Oregon Occupational Safety and Health Division (OR-OSHA) is aware in a timely manner. 1.2 Laboratory Disease Reporting Requirements 1. Laboratories must report all blood lead test results directly to the local health authority or Oregon Health Authority (OHA) within seven days [333-018-0015 4(d)]. Lead poisoning (>= 5ug/dL under 18 years of age, >= 10 µg/dL over 18 years) must be reported within one local health department working day [333-018-0015 4(c)]; results may be sent electronically or faxed to (971) 673-0457. 2. Oregon law requires labs that send an average of >30 records per month to OHA to submit the data electronically. Please contact OHA at 971-673-1111 for Electronic Laboratory Reporting (ELR) initiation, assistance and approval. 1.3 Clinician Disease Reporting Requirements 1.
    [Show full text]
  • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY WHO Library Cataloguing-In-Publication Data
    PREVENTING DISEASE THROUGH HEALTHY ENVIRONMENTS Towards an estimate of the environmental burden of disease EXECUTIVE SUMMARY WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Prüss-Üstün, Annette. Preventing disease through healthy environments : towards an estimate of the environmental burden of disease : executive summary / Prüss-Üstün A, Corvalán C. 1.Environmental monitoring. 2.Cost of illness. 3.Risk factors. I.Corvalán, Carlos F. II.World Health Organization. III.Title. ISBN 92 4 159420 9 (NLM classification: WA 30.5) ISBN 978 92 4 159420 2 © World Health Organization 2006 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – should be addressed to WHO Press, at the above address (fax: +41 22 791 4806; e-mail: [email protected]). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Lead, Mercury and Cadmium in Fish and Shellfish from the Indian Ocean and Red
    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Review Lead, Mercury and Cadmium in Fish and Shellfish from the Indian Ocean and Red Sea (African Countries): Public Health Challenges Isidro José Tamele 1,2,3,* and Patricia Vázquez Loureiro 4 1 Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Eduardo Mondlane University, Av. Julius Nyerere, n 3453, Campus Principal, Maputo 257, Mozambique 2 Institute of Biomedical Science Abel Salazar, University of Porto, R. Jorge de Viterbo Ferreira 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal 3 CIIMAR/CIMAR—Interdisciplinary Center of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Terminal de Cruzeiros do Porto, Avenida General Norton de Matos, 4450-238 Matosinhos, Portugal 4 Department of Analytical Chemistry, Nutrition and Food Science, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, 15782 A Coruña, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 20 March 2020; Accepted: 8 May 2020; Published: 12 May 2020 Abstract: The main aim of this review was to assess the incidence of Pb, Hg and Cd in seafood from African countries on the Indian and the Red Sea coasts and the level of their monitoring and control, where the direct consumption of seafood without quality control are frequently due to the poverty in many African countries. Some seafood from African Indian and the Red Sea coasts such as mollusks and fishes have presented Cd, Pb and Hg concentrations higher than permitted limit by FAOUN/EU regulations, indicating a possible threat to public health. Thus, the operationalization of the heavy metals (HM) monitoring and control is strongly recommended since these countries have laboratories with minimal conditions for HM analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • An Update and Review of Unconventional Metals Testing and Treatment
    Toxics 2014, 2, 403-416; doi:10.3390/toxics2030403 OPEN ACCESS toxics ISSN 2305-6304 www.mdpi.com/journal/toxics Review An Update and Review of Unconventional Metals Testing and Treatment Diana J. Felton 1,2,*, Stefanos N. Kales 2,3,4,† and Rose H. Goldman 2,3,4,† 1 Harvard Medical Toxicology Fellowship, Boston Children’s Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA 2 Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA; E-Mails: [email protected] (S.N.K.); [email protected] (R.H.G.) 3 Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Cambridge Health Alliance, 1493 Cambridge St, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 4 Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, 667 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA † These authors contributed equally to this work. * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-617-355-5189; Fax: +1-617-730-0521. Received: 20 May 2014; in revised form: 29 July 2014 / Accepted: 30 July 2014 / Published: 11 August 2014 Abstract: Most patients who receive unconventional testing for metals do not have any remarkable exposure history and typically lack symptoms or objective findings compatible with classic heavy metal intoxication. Unconventional tests results are usually promoted by alternative practitioners as the basis for recommending, promoting, and selling to the patient questionable and often inappropriate therapies/interventions supposedly aimed at ―detoxification‖. Most of these patients will have no evidence of overexposure to metals on the basis of a thorough history and will have levels of metals on conventional tests performed at reliable laboratories that are undetectable, within population background ranges or above population background, but well below levels associated with toxicity.
    [Show full text]