Annex 2 – Capacity Assessment Scorecards
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Annex 2 – Capacity Assessment Scorecards Summary of the Capacity Assessment Scores BMB NCIP BUKLURAN CR 1: Capacities for Engagement 2.5 2 1 Indicator 1: Degree of legitimacy/mandate of lead environmental organizations 2.33 2 0 Indicator 2: Existence of operational co-management mechanisms 2.67 1 1 Indicator 3: Existence of cooperation with stakeholder groups 2,67 2 2 Indicator 4: Identification of lead personnel 2.5 1 2 Indicator 5: Articulation of stakeholder’s interest Average 2.534 1.600 1.200 CR 2: Capacities to Generate, Access and Use of Information and Knowledge 2.67 1 2 Indicator 6: Degree of environmental awareness of stakeholders 2 1 1 Indicator 7: Access and sharing of environmental information by stakeholders 1.67 1 0 Indicator 8: Existence of Environmental education programmes 1.67 1 0 Indicator 9: Extent of the linkage between environmental research/science and policy development 2.17 1 2 Indicator 10: Extent of inclusion/use of traditional knowledge in environmental decision-making 2.5 1 2 Indicator 11: Knowledge of local environmental issues Average 2.113 1.000 1.167 CR 3: Capacities for Strategy, Policy and Legislation Development 2 1 1 Indicator 12: Extent of environmental planning and strategy development process 2 1 0 Indicator 13: Existence of adequate environmental policies and regulatory frameworks 1.17 1 1 Indicator 14: Adequacy of the environmental information available for decision-making BMB NCIP BUKLURAN Average 1.723 1.000 0.667 CR 4: Capacities for Management and Implementation Indicator 15: Existence and mobilization of resources 2 2 0 2.83 1 1 Indicator 16: Availability of required technical skills and technology transfer Average 2.415 1.500 0.500 CR 5: Capacities to Monitor and Evaluate Indicator 17: Adequacy of the project /programme monitoring process 3 0 0 Indicator 18: Adequacy of the project/programme evaluation process 1 0 Indicator 19: Previous experience on monitoring and evaluation 1 0 Average 2.943 0.667 0.000 Project Name: Strengthening National System to Improve Governance and Management of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities Conserved Areas and Territories Project Cycle Phase: Preparation Date: 10 November 2014; validated on April 13, 2015 Biodiversity Management Bureau Capacity Contribution to Staged Indicator Rating Comments Next steps Result/Indicator which Outcome CR 1: Capacities for Engagement Organizational responsibilities for environmental management are not 0 clearly defined Organizational responsibilities for environmental management are Indicator 1: Degree of 1 legitimacy/mandate of identified lead environmental Authority and legitimacy of all lead organizations responsible for 2 organizations environmental management are partially recognized by stakeholders. 2.5 Authority and legitimacy of all lead organizations responsible for 3 environmental management recognized by stakeholders No co-management mechanisms are in place 0 Indicator 2: Existence of Some co-management mechanisms are in place and operational 1 operational co- Some co-management mechanisms are formally established through management mechanisms 2 agreements, MOUs, etc. 2.33 Comprehensive co-management mechanisms are formally established 3 and are operational / functional Identification of stakeholders and their participation/involvement in 0 decision-making is poor Indicator 3: Existence of Stakeholders are identified, but their participation in decision-making cooperation with 1 is limited stakeholder groups Stakeholders are identified, and regular consultations mechanisms are 2 established 2.67 Capacity Contribution to Staged Indicator Rating Comments Next steps Result/Indicator which Outcome Stakeholders are identified, and they actively contribute to established 3 participative decision-making process No personnel involved yet 0 Depends on who is available 1 Indicator 4: Identification of lead personnel Regular personnel is assigned but not formalized 2 2.67 Regular personnel assigned formally 3 Stakeholderts are not articulate as to their interests 0 Some members are capable of articulating their interests 1 Indicator 5: Articulation of stakeholder’s interest Many members of the stakeholders group are capable of articulating 2 their interests 2.5 Interest of the stakeholders group are formally articulated in a written 3 documents and well understood by its members CR 2: Capacities to Generate, Access and Use of Information and Knowledge Stakeholders are not aware of global environmental issues and their 0 relevant possible solutions Stakeholders are aware of the global environmental issues, but not the 1 Indicator 6: Degree of possible solutions environmental awareness Stakeholders are aware of the global environmental issues and the of stakeholders 2 possible solutions, but do not know how to participate 2.67 Stakeholders are aware of the global environmental issues, and are 3 actively participating in the implementation of relevant solutions Environmental information needs are not identified, and the Indicator 7: Access and 0 sharing of environmental information management infrastructure is inadequate information by The environmental information needs are identified, but the 1 stakeholders information management infrastructure is inadequate Capacity Contribution to Staged Indicator Rating Comments Next steps Result/Indicator which Outcome The environmental information is partially available and shared among stakeholders, but not covering all focal areas and/or the information 2 2 management infrastructure is limited Comprehensive environmental information is available and shared 3 through an adequate information management infrastructure No environmental programmes are in place 0 Environmental education programmes are partially developed and 1.67 1 Indicator 8: Existence of partially delivered Environmental education Environmental education programmes are fully developed but partially 2 programmes delivered Comprehensive environmental education programmes exist and are 3 being delivered No linkage exist between environmental policy development and 0 science/research strategies and programmes Research needs for environmental policy development are identified, Indicator 9: Extent of the but are not translated into relevant research strategies and 1 1.67 linkage between programmes environmental research/science and Relevant research strategies and programmes for environmental policy policy development development exist, but the research information is not responding fully 2 to the policy research needs Relevant research results are available for environmental policy 3 development Traditional knowledge is ignored and not taken into account for 0 relevant participative decision-making processes Indicator 10: Extent of Traditional knowledge is identified and recognized as important, but inclusion/use of traditional not collected and used in relevant participative decision-making 1 knowledge in processes environmental decision- Traditional knowledge is collected, but is not used systematically into 2 making relevant participative decision-making processes 2.17 Traditional knowledge is collected, used and shared for effective 3 participative decision-making processes Indicator 11: Knowledge of No knowledge 0 local environmental issues Capacity Contribution to Staged Indicator Rating Comments Next steps Result/Indicator which Outcome Mere awareness of local environmental issues 1 Knowledge of local environmental issues including root causes 2 2.5 Knowledge of local environmental issues and the possible solutions / 3 remedies to these problems CR 3: Capacities for Strategy, Policy and Legislation Development The environmental planning and strategy development process is not coordinated, and does not produce adequate environmental plans and 0 strategies The environmental planning and strategy development process does produce adequate environmental plans and strategies, but they are not 1 Indicator 12: Extent of implemented or used environmental planning Adequate environmental plans and strategies are produced, but are and strategy development process only partially implemented because of funding constraints and / or 2 2 other problems Environmental planning and strategy development process is well coordinated by the lead environmental organizations, and produces 3 the required environmental plans and strategies that are being implemented Environmental policy and regulatory frameworks are insufficient; they 0 do not provide an enabling environment Some relevant environmental policies and laws exist, but few are 1 implemented and enforced There is no explicit Indicator 13: Existence of 2 policy supporting adequate environmental ICCA recognition. policies and regulatory Advocate for the However, there frameworks Adequate environmental policy and legislation frameworks exist, but approval/ passage 2 are already there are problems in implementing and enforcing them of these policy existing drafts for measures. the documentation and recognition of ICCA. Capacity Contribution to Staged Indicator Rating Comments Next steps Result/Indicator which Outcome Adequate policy and legislation frameworks are implemented, and provide an adequate enabling environment; a compliance and 3 enforcement mechanism is established and functions The availability of environmental information for decision-making is 0 lacking Some environmental information exists, but it is not sufficient to Need to process 1 support environmental decision-making processes 1.17 and consolidate New information these information, Indicator 14: