DOCSLIB.ORG

I Automated Finerprint I Id Ntification Tern

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
I Automated Finerprint I Id Ntification Tern If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. I I Automated Finerprint I Id ntification tern I I I I I I I I I I I I I October 1990 ILLINOIS CRIMINAL JUSTICE I INFORMATION AUTHORITY ., I I I I AUTOMATED FINGERPRINT IDENTIFICATION I SYSTEM (AFIS) REFERENCE GUIDE I I I October 1990 I I Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority I William Gould, Chairman J. David Coldren, Executive Director I I Jackie Front, Project Leader I Sheila Lally, Project Staff I John Firman, Project Advisor I . Copyright@1990 Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority 120 South Riverside Plaza Chicago, Illinois 60606·3997 I (312)793·8550 i Any portion of this pUblication may be reproduced with the correct citation. I I I ~- I I- ! I I I I- I 127129 I U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the I person or organization originating it. Poinls of view or opinions staled in Ihls document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. I Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material has been granted by Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority I to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permis­ sion of the copyright owner. I I I I I I I I I - --~------------------ ; I TABLE OF CONTENTS I I Introduction ........................................................ iii How To Use The Guide ............................................... vi I Definitions ......................................................... vii I .AFIS Site Map. .. ix .AFIS Users Listed by State, Country or Network. 1 I Alaslm . 3 California ..................................................... 4 I Canada ....................................................... 16 Colorado ...................................................... 18 Delaware . .. 20 I Florida ..... ,................................................. 21 Georgia .................................................. '. .. 25 Hawaii. .. 26 I· Illinois . .. 28 Indiana. .. 31 I Iowa ......................................................... 33 Kansas ....................................................... 35 Kentucky. .. 36 I Louisiana . .. 37 Maryland . .. 38 I Massachusetts . .. 39 Michigan . .. 40 Minnesota . 44 ·1 Missouri ...................................................... ·45 Nevada ....................................................... 47 I New Jersey. .. 48 N ev{ Mexico ................................................... 49 I illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority I. AFIS Reference Guide Page i I I , New York •••••••••••••••••••••••• 0 ••• D •••••• 0 ••••••••••••• !l. ••• 50 North Carolina ..................... -; .......................... 54 ·1 Ohio .................................................... " ... 56 Oklahoma .................................................... 57 I Pennsylvan.ia . 58 South C~olina .......................................... 0 •••••• 61 Tennessee .................................................... 62 I Texas o. 0 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• II •••••••••••••••••••••• 63 · .. VIrgIDla ," . ................... " ............... " ................. 65 I Washington ........................ ~ ............ G • " ••••••••••••• 70 Washington D.C ................................................ 75 Western Identification Network (WIN) .............................. 76 I Wisconsin .................................................... 80 AFIS Users Listed By Vendor .......................................... 81 I Identification and Security Systems, Inc .............................. 83 De La. Rue Printrak, Inc. ........................................ 84 I NEC Information Systems, Inc. .................................. 101 North American Morpho Systems, Inc. ............................ 130 Federal Bureau of Investigation AFIS .............................. 136 I ·1 I I I I I I lllinois Criminal Justice Information Authority AFIS Reference Guide I Page ii I I I I INTRODUCTION I When he unveiled the Illinois State Police's Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS) in 1989, Governor James R. Thompson called AFIS "one of the most revolutionary achievements in law enforcement and crime detection in my life as a I prosecutor, a criminal justice teacher, and a governor." But to realize the vast promise of this technology, both current and potential AFIS users need to exchange I information, experience, and ideas with one another. The Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority has created this AFIS Reference Guide to promote the sharing I of information about AFIS in Illinois, throughout the country and in Canada. The AFIS Reference Guide is a comprehensive listing of Automated Fingerprint I Identification Systems (AFIS) in the United States and Canada. As of 1989, approximately one-half of the states were operating, or were in the process of implementing, criminal justice AFIS systems. In addition, at that time, virtually every I non-AFIS state was in various stages of planning for, or implementing AFIS.l As of June 1990, the Authority had identified 68 databases throughout the United States and Canada and 164 user sites (see the definitions following). With the growing I 'number of AFIS users and the growing interest in this technological breakthrough, this guide is a timely effort to promote information. sharing among AFIS agencies I, regardless of vendor, and among states that are in different stages of implementing the technology. I The APIS Reference Guide was compiled with the assistance of many sources. Listings of current users were acquired from the various vendors, user groups and other I private organizations. Basic agency information was collected through telephone interviews with the AFIS contacts for each site. It should be noted that any guide of this type is only comprehensive at the time of publication, and the Authority realizes I that changes and additions may have occurred. I I Legal and Policy Issues Relating to Biometric .Tdentiiication Technologies, 1989, Sacramento, I California, SEARCH Group, Inc. Dlinois Criminal Justice Information Authority AFIS Reference Guide I Page iii I' I The AFIS Reference Guide is organized by state, country, or network and by vendor. The first section is in alphabetical order by state, country, or network. Within each portion of thic:; section, sites are arranged by central site, with their user sites I indented directly below. It should be noted that some shared systems, a system in which two or more agencies share a database, are also user sites to central sites. They I have been listed as user sites, but it is indicated that they are also shared systems. The vendor section is arranged by AFIS vendor, with the users of that vendor listed alphabetically (there are some technical exceptions for shared systems). It should also I be noted that none of the site categories is mutually exclusive: for example, a site that is a user site to a central site may also have its own database; therefore, it is listed I as a user site/central site. At present, different AFIS systems do not communicate effectively with one another. I Few standards exist for implementing AFIS systems and for sharing data across systems. In the future, a much broader AFIS capability will be desired. The goal of I the AFIS Reference Guide, through increased information sharing, is to assist in the development of better systems in the future. There are at least five policy issues that should be kept in mind as agencies consider implementing or expanding AFIS systems: I o System Compatibility -- the ability of AFIS systems to be interfaced and I networked is critical to improving law enforcement's crime.. solving capabilities. I' o Local Agency Access to AFIS Systems -- for many local law enforcement agencies, the cost of acquiring an AFIS system is prohibitive. For them, " the only real opportunity to take part in the technology is by accessing existing systems through remote terminals. I o Better Integration of AFIS with Computerized Criminal History Systems -- until local agencies are given remote access to AFIS systems, I and until those AFIS systems are more closely integrated with computerized criminal history systems, the true potential of AFIS will I not be realized. I Dlinois Criminal Justice Information Authority AFIS Reference Guide I Page iv I I I I o Access to AFIS by Non-Criminal Justice Agencies·- in the future, the fastest growing use of AFIS will most likely be to support the increasing number of background checks for job applicants or people seeking I licenses in fields not directly related to criminal justice. a Ongoing Research and Evaluation of AFIS -- the impact of AFIS on law I enforcement and the entire criminal justice system is not yet adequately understood Long-term research to evaluate AFIS's impact should be I initiated nationwide. I While this guide does not by itself solve any of the problems listed here, it will help users gain insight into AFIS through contact with other users, which in turn will aid I agencies in developing more effective long-range AFIS policies. It will also promote collaboration among AFIS users and prospective users. As a follow-up to the guide, the Authority is currently working with the University of Illinois at Chicago's Forensic I Science Program on an AFIS impact study on selected sites across the United States. I The Authority would also
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ron Shoemaker V. Indiana State Police Department
    ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Ryan P. Sink Gregory F. Zoeller Indianapolis, Indiana Attorney General of Indiana Aaron T. Craft Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana I N T H E COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA Ron Shoemaker, November 2, 2016 Appellant-Plaintiff, Court of Appeals Case No. 49A02-1604-PL-879 v. Appeal from the Marion Superior Court Indiana State Police The Honorable Gary L. Miller, Department, Judge Appellee-Defendant. Trial Court Cause No. 49D03-1408-PL-26357 Altice, Judge. Case Summary [1] Ronald Shoemaker, a law enforcement officer with the Indiana State Police Department (ISP) for well over twenty years, was demoted in rank and pay in 2013 shortly after a new Superintendent of ISP was appointed. Shoemaker believes that the demotion was the result of a whistleblower report he filed with Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 49A02-1604-PL-879 | November 2, 2016 Page 1 of 15 his supervisor about four years earlier. Pursuant to Ind. Code § 4-15-10-4, the Whistleblower Law (the WBL), Shoemaker initiated an administrative appeal of his demotion. After his action was dismissed by the administrative law judge (the ALJ) for being untimely filed, Shoemaker did not pursue judicial review of the administrative decision. He filed the instant breach of contract action instead. ISP sought summary judgment on the ground that Shoemaker failed to exhaust his administrative remedies and could not bring an action for breach of contract under the WBL.1 The trial court granted ISP’s motion for summary judgment, and Shoemaker
    [Show full text]
  • Rank State Population Troopers Per Capita Total Troopers 1 Florida
    Rank State Population Troopers per Capita Total Troopers 1 Florida 18,801,000 8.473 1593 2 Georgia 9,688,000 8.237 798 3 Delaware 898,000 7.272 653 4 Alaska 710,000 5.451 387 5 Vermont 626,000 5.224 327 6 West Virginia 1,853,000 3.756 696 7 Wyoming 564,000 3.475 196 8 Pennsylvania 12,702,000 3.458 4392 9 Massachusetts 6,548,000 3.129 2049 10 New Jersey 8,792,000 3.11 2734 11 Connecticut 3,574,000 3.022 1080 12 New Mexico 2,059,000 2.632 542 13 Montana 989,000 2.568 254 14 Nebraska 1,826,000 2.568 469 15 New Hampshire 1,316,000 2.492 328 16 Maryland 5,774,000 2.473 1428 17 Maine 1,328,000 2.402 319 18 New York 19,378,000 2.333 4521 19 Virginia 8,001,000 2.307 1846 20 North Dakota 673,000 2.199 148 21 Louisiana 4,533,000 2.16 979 22 Oklahoma 3,751,000 2.127 798 23 California 37,254,000 2.086 7773 24 Rhode Island 1,053,000 2.061 217 25 Kentucky 4,339,000 2.053 891 26 Missouri 5,989,000 2.047 1226 27 South Dakota 814,000 1.99 162 28 Kentucky 4,339,000 2.053 891 29 Kentucky 4,339,000 2.053 891 30 Indiana 6,484,000 1.883 1221 31 Michigan 9,884,000 1.817 1796 32 Kansas 2,853,000 1.791 511 33 Nevada 2,701,000 1.785 462 34 North Carolina 9,535,000 1.769 1687 35 South Carolina 4,625,000 1.745 807 36 Oregon 3,831,000 1.731 663 37 Idaho 1,568,000 1.665 261 38 Utah 2,764,000 1.606 444 39 Washington 6,725,000 1.573 1058 40 Arizona 6,392,000 1.492 954 41 Illinois 12,831,000 1.483 1903 42 Colorado 5,029,000 1.469 739 43 Alabama 4,780,000 1.391 665 44 Texas 25,146,000 1.375 3457 45 Ohio 11,537,000 1.252 1445 46 Iowa 3,046,000 1.244 379 47 Tennessee 6,346,000
    [Show full text]
  • IMPACT UPDATE Protecting, Preventing, Providing Larry Hogan Boyd K
    Vol. 1, Issue 6, July 2018 IMPACT UPDATE Protecting, Preventing, Providing Larry Hogan Boyd K. Rutherford Colonel William Pallozzi Governor Lt. Governor Superintendent ‘Operation Broken Heart’ Yields 56 Arrests In Maryland Maryland State Police Investigators Arrest 21 Suspects In Three-Month Initiative (COLUMBIA, Md.) – Maryland’s Inter- operation, the task forces delivered more Contents net Crimes Against Children Task Force than 3,700 presentations on Internet safe- arrested 35 suspects in Maryland, nine of ty to over 390,000 youth and adults na- Easton Barrack starts whom were arrested by Maryland State tionally. “Lose the Booze” plan Police investigators, while participating in The Maryland ICAC Task Force is com- “Operation Broken Heart,” a nation- Trooper, Orioles Honor prised of police agencies statewide. They wide, three-month initiative that targeted Baltimore Students concentrated on those offenders who offenders involved in child sexual exploi- possess, manufacture, and distribute tation. MSP Participates In child pornography and who engage in Torch Run For Special The Maryland Internet Crimes Against online enticement of children for sexual Olympics Maryland Children Task Force (ICAC) was one of purposes. They also targeted crimes in- 61 task forces included in “Operation cluding child prostitution and violators MSP, VSP Enforce Broken Heart.” Members from the Mar- traveling abroad to sexually abuse foreign “Move Over” Law yland ICAC worked tirelessly throughout children. March, April and May, initiating 426 in- The primary mission of the Task Force Frederick Barrack vestigations. Investigators served 149 continues to be to protect children from Participates In “Border search warrants and made 56 arrests. computer-facilitated sexual exploitation.
    [Show full text]
  • CAR SEAT SAFETY Safety Tips and Requirements
    CAR SEAT SAFETY Safety tips and requirements. Motor vehicle injuries are a leading cause of death among children in the United States. But many of these deaths can be prevented by properly using child car seats. Every parent and caregiver is responsible to ensure that all children under their care are as safe as can possibly be at all times. While riding in a motor vehicle, the only way to do this is to ensure the child is properly restrained. Children under 12 years old don’t belong in the front seat! Statistics Car seat safety tips • Car seat use reduces the risk for death to infants • Always follow your car seat’s height and weight (aged <1 year) by 71%; and to toddlers (aged 1–4 limits. years) by 54% in passenger vehicles. • Make sure your car seat can be correctly installed in • Booster seat use reduces the risk for serious your vehicle. injury by 45% for children aged 4–8 years when • Keep the retainer clip (chest clip) fastened at armpit compared with seat belt use alone. level - not over their belly. • For older children and adults, seat belt use reduces the risk for death and serious injury by approximately half. The timeline of car seat requirements • Children under 2 years old should always be in a rear-facing seat. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that children who are over 2 years old or who have outgrown their rear-facing car seats use a forward-facing seat with a harness until they reach the highest weight allowed by the forward-facing seat’s manufacturer.
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana State Police Alliance Celebrating 45 Years
    Challenges and Triumphs of Indiana State Police EOD Commission the Growing DNA Database Participate in Raven’s History Project Challenge INSIDE FALL 2019 VOLUME 5 • ISSUE 2 OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OFOF THETHE INDIANAINDIANA STATE STATE POLICE POLICE ALLIANCE, ALLIANCE, INC. INC. VOLUME 5 • ISSUE 2 • FALL 2019 est. INDIANA STATE POLICE ALLIANCE CELEBRATING 45 YEARS LETTERS FROM THE PRESIDENT AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FALL 2019 CONTENTS VOLUME 5 • ISSUE 2 FEATURES ISP Commission History 12 An Obsession to Document the History of Our ISP Commissions. By Mike Carrick Indiana State Police EOD Participates 8 in Raven’s Challenge Held at Muscatatuck Urban Training Center in 2017, 2018 and 2019 By Kent Havens 16 DNA Data Base Challenges and Triumphs of the Growing DNA Database By Kristine Crouch CODIS State Administrator 2006 – present 2 Indiana State Police Alliance OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE INDIANA STATE POLICE ALLIANCE, INC. VOLUME 5 • ISSUE 2 • FALL 2019 DEPARTMENTS ISPA BOARD Scott Krueger.......................President Shaun Armes .........................Area II President’s Letter . 7 Pete Wood .................Vice President Ross Johnson ........................Area III Chris Hill ............................. Area IV Celebrating the Future Mike Wood ...........Secretary/Area VI Will Etter ................Treasurer/Area V Will Etter ...............................Area V as we Look to the past Mike Jones ..............................Area I Mike Wood ..........................Area VI DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVES Executive Director . 5 Lowell
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana State Police
    HEALTH WEALTH CAREER INDIANA STATE POLICE TOTAL REWARDS REVIEW March 2016 Laura Mooser Principal [email protected] Carol Goose Principal [email protected] Kate Cross Senior Associate [email protected] Pete Eddings Analyst [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Introduction 2 • Overarching Methodology • Executive Summary Total Rewards Review 13 • Total Rewards Reported by Position Pay Structure Review 25 • Base Pay Reported by Position • Upcoming Base Pay Changes Pay Practices 38 Appendices 48 • A: Data Request • B: Participant Contact Information • C: List of Positions • D: Detailed Project Methodology • E: Police Entities Details and Footnotes • F: Benefits Assessment © MERCER 2016 1 INTRODUCTION © MERCER 2016 2 © MERCER 2016 2 INTRODUCTION • The Legislative Council of the Indiana General Assembly assigned the Budget Committee (“the Committee”) the task of completing a total rewards study (i.e., compensation and benefits) for the Indiana State Police Department (“ISP”). • The Committee asked Mercer to complete a total rewards analysis of all ranking officers of the ISP. • Mercer worked with officials within the Indiana State Budget Agency and Personnel Department (“Project Team”) to coordinate the review. • This report contains detailed analysis of the data collected by Mercer for the benefit of the State of Indiana. • This report will be provided to the Committee at a meeting in the Spring of 2016. It is important to note that Mercer collected and is reporting information used for hiring new officers, as well as data on the compensation and benefits provided to existing officers. For these reasons, the data reported is robust and in some cases, complex.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2, 2009 Annual Meeting
    IACP Drug Evaluation and Classification Program Annual Technical Advisory Panel Meeting Friday, October 1, 2009 Denver, Colorado The annual meeting of the IACP Technical Advisory Panel to the DEC Program was held on Friday, October 2, 2009, at the Grand Hyatt, in Denver, CO. PRESENT: Earl Sweeney, TAP chair; Sergeant Danny Lamm, California Highway Patrol; Gary Fief, assistant chief (retired), California Highway Patrol; T/Sergeant Doug Paquette, New York State Police; Frank Kowaleski, law enforcement liaison, Virginia Highway Safety Office; Officer Dan Mulleneaux, Phoenix, Arizona, Police Department; Joe Turner, Indiana Law Enforcement Academy; Sergeant Don Decker; Marblehead, Massachusetts, Police Department; Sergeant Rob Martin, York Regional Police, Canada; Lt. Tom Woodward, Maryland State Police; Troy Costales, Oregon Department of Transportation; Cynthia Burbach, Colorado Toxicology Laboratory; Major Jim Maisano, Norman, Oklahoma, Police Department; Dr. Jack Richman, O.D., New England College of Optometry; Garrett Morford, NHTSA; Ken Lebrato, prosecutor, Carteret, New Jersey; and Bob Jacob; director of the Institute of Police Technology and Management. IACP STAFF: Ernie Floegel and Chuck Hayes Guests: Mark George, Boulder, Colorado, Police Department; Joanne Michaels, National Traffic Law Center; Tim Gaffney, Pinal County, Arizona, Sheriff’s Office; Sergeant Courtney Stewart, state DRE coordinator, Washington State Patrol; Senior Trooper Mike Iwai, state DRE coordinator, Oregon State Police; Glenn Davis, state DRE coordinator, Colorado Department of Transportation, Jim Williamson, Littleton, Colorado, Police Department (retired); Sergeant Don Marose, state DRE coordinator, Minnesota State Patrol; Keith Benz, Minnesota State Patrol; Bill Tower, law enforcement liaison, NHTSA Region III; Commander Joe Klima, Phoenix, Arizona, Police Department; and Major Dave Salmon, New York State Police.
    [Show full text]
  • SLEOLA Contract
    MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE STATE OF MARYLAND AND THE STATE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS LABOR ALLIANCE July 1, 2019 – June 30, 2022 40 Table of Contents Article & Title Page Preamble 3 Article I Recognition 3 Article II Non-Discrimination 4 Article III Management Rights 4 Article IV Union Rights 4 Article V Labor / Management Committees 8 Article VI Salary, Compensation & Pay Plans 8 Article VII Insurance & Benefits 14 Article VIII Dispute Resolution Procedure 14 Article IX Leave With Pay 16 Article X Leave Without Pay 18 Article XI Holidays 19 Article XII Safety 19 Article XIII Reduction In Force 19 Article XIV Miscellaneous 20 Article XV Work Stoppages 20 Article XVI Personnel File 20 Article XVII Mid-Contract Negotiations 21 Article XVIII Provisions Applicable to Particular Agencies Section 1. Maryland State Police 22 Section 2. Natural Resources Police 25 Section 3. Maryland Capitol Police 26 Section 4. Office of the State Fire Marshal 27 Section 5. Department of Health Police 29 Section 6. Department of Labor, Licensing & Regulation Police 30 Section 7. Motor Vehicle Administration Police 30 Section 8. Provisions Applicable to the Department of Public Safety and Corrections IIU and WAU 29 Section 9. Provisions Applicable to the Office of the Comptroller/Field Enforcement Agents 30 Article XIX Savings Clause 30 Article XX Publication of Agreement 30 Article XXI Duration 31 Appendices Appendix A-1. Grievance Procedure for Sworn Maryland State Police Employees 32 Appendix A-2. SLEOLA Interest Arbitration 37 Appendix A-3. MSP / NRP Salary Schedule Effective July 1, 2019 40 Appendix A-4. MSP Aviation Salary Schedule Effective July 1, 2019 41 Appendix A-5.
    [Show full text]
  • The Official Publication of the Kentucky State Police Professional Association February 2015 Together We Serve
    The Official Publication of the Kentucky State Police Professional Association February 2015 Together we serve. Caring for the security and health of Kentucky’s citizens. To all of you who join us to protect the safety and well-being of the communities of the Commonwealth, we honor your commitment to excellence and faithful service. The Kentucky State Police Professional Association 633 Chamberlin Avenue Frankfort, KY 40601 www.ksppa.com 502-875-1625 TABLE OF CONTENTS This Kentucky Trooper magazine DEPARTMENTS is published for the KSPPA by Wildlife Publishing, 104 East Main Street, Auburn, KY 42206, 7 Letter from President and is dedicated to professional 23 Cold Case Files law enforcement and public education. Information on 50 Update from The Island activities within the Kentucky State Police Professional Association 61 Special Ad Section is provided for our members and 66 Gold / Silver / Bronze the public. Neither the KSPPA nor Wildlife Publishing endorses 70 Advertiser's Directory products or services listed within this publication, nor accepts any liability arising from the use of products or services listed. Purchasing advertising space in this magazine does not entitle the ON THE COVER advertiser to any special favors or privileges from any member Judge Sara Combs administered the Oath of of the Kentucky State Police Offi ce to KSP Cadet Class 92 in the rotunda Professional Association. of the State Capitol Building in Frankfort on January 13, 2015. See more on page 10. KSPPA Executive Board President ..............................................Tim Hazlette District 6, Dry Ridge.......................... Steve Wolfzorn 1st Vice President ............................ Kevin Woosley District 7, Richmond ................................Toby Coyle Treasurer ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Department of State Police Workforce Civilianization
    Special Report Department of State Police Workforce Civilianization Opportunities Exist to Increase Civilian Employment December 2016 OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE AUDITS DEPARTMENT OF LEGISLATIVE SERVICES MARYLAND GENERAL ASSEMBLY For further information concerning this report contact: Department of Legislative Services Office of Legislative Audits 301 West Preston Street, Room 1202 Baltimore, Maryland 21201 Phone: 410-946-5900 · 301-970-5900 Toll Free in Maryland: 1-877-486-9964 Maryland Relay: 711 TTY: 410-946-5401 · 301-970-5401 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.ola.state.md.us The Office of Legislative Audits operates a Fraud Hotline to report fraud, waste, or abuse involving State of Maryland government resources. Reports of fraud, waste, or abuse may be communicated anonymously by a toll-free call to 1-877-FRAUD-11, by mail to the Fraud Hotline, c/o Office of Legislative Audits, or through the Office’s website. The Department of Legislative Services does not discriminate on the basis of age, ancestry, color, creed, marital status, national origin, race, religion, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, or disability in the admission or access to its programs, services, or activities. The Department’s Information Officer has been designated to coordinate compliance with the nondiscrimination requirements contained in Section 35.107 of the Department of Justice Regulations. Requests for assistance should be directed to the Information Officer at 410-946-5400 or 410-970-5400. DEPARTMENT OF LEGISLATIVE SERvIcEs OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE AUDITS MARYLAND GENERAL ASSEMBLY Wiirren G. I)eschenaux ThomasJ. Barnickel III. CPA Executive Director Legislative Auditor December 28, 2016 Senator Edward J.
    [Show full text]
  • Women in Southern State Police and Highway Patrol Agencies, 1972-2012
    University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations Dissertations and Theses Spring 5-18-2018 Asphalt Magnolias: Women in Southern State Police and Highway Patrol Agencies, 1972-2012 Genevieve May University of New Orleans, New Orleans, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation May, Genevieve, "Asphalt Magnolias: Women in Southern State Police and Highway Patrol Agencies, 1972-2012" (2018). University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations. 2474. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/2474 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by ScholarWorks@UNO with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Asphalt Magnolias: Women in Southern State Police and Highway Patrol Agencies, 1972-2012 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of New Orleans in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Urban Studies By Genevieve L. May B.S. Southeastern Louisiana University, 1972 MPA Louisiana State University, 2002 M.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Annual Report
    LOUISIANA INSURANCE FRAUD TASK FORCE 2020 Annual Report 2020 Annual Report The Louisiana Insurance Fraud Task Force is a statutorily mandated partnership between three state agencies created to collectively investigate and deter acts of insurance fraud and auto theft in Louisiana. The following three agencies are members of the Task Force: Louisiana State Police Insurance Fraud / Auto Theft Program Office of the Attorney General Insurance Fraud Support Unit Louisiana Department of Insurance Insurance Fraud Section Louisiana Automobile Theft and Insurance Fraud Prevention Authority Insurance fraud is any fraudulent act, knowingly and willfully committed by any person in an attempt to injure, defraud, or deceive an insurance company. In Louisiana, insurance fraud is a felony, and when convicted, penalties could include jail time, fines, community service, probation and/or restitution. 2 2020 Annual Report Table of Contents Letter From Louisiana State Police Superintendent 4 Louisiana State Police Insurance Fraud / Auto Theft Program 5 Program Notes 6 Referral Information 7 Investigations and Arrests 9 Criminal Investigations by Type 10 Judicial Actions 11 Budget Expenditures 12 Investigative Highlights 13 Law Enforcement Training and Auto Theft 16 Personnel Movement and Highlights 17 Office of the Attorney General / Insurance Fraud Support Unit 18 Basic Information 19 Statutory Authority 20 Purpose and Expenditures 21 Statistical Information and Other Accomplishments 22 Department of Insurance / Insurance Fraud Section & LATIFPA 23 Claims Fraud / Crime Categories and Charges 24 Producer, Claims Adjuster and Company Fraud Actions 25 Background Investigations / LATIFPA 25 2020 Expenditures / LATIFPA Budget 26 How to Report Fraud 27 3 2020 Annual Report Letter From The Superintendent State of Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections Public Safety Services February 5, 2021 Honorable John Bel Edwards Office of the Governor State Capital LAMAR A.
    [Show full text]