Checklist of the Species of the Genera Amanita and Limacella (Agaricomycetes) in Estonia
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Molecular Phylogenetic Studies in the Genus Amanita
1170 Molecular phylogenetic studies in the genus Amanita I5ichael Weiß, Zhu-Liang Yang, and Franz Oberwinkler Abstracl A group of 49 Amanita species that had been thoroughly examined morphologically and amtomically was analyzed by DNA sequence compadson to estimate natural groups and phylogenetic rclationships within the genus. Nuclear DNA sequences coding for a part of the ribosomal large subunit were determined and evaluated using neighbor-joining with bootstrap analysis, parsimony analysis, conditional clustering, and maximum likelihood methods, Sections Amanita, Caesarea, Vaginatae, Validae, Phalloideae, and Amidella were substantially confirmed as monophyletic groups, while the monophyly of section Lepidell.t remained unclear. Branching topologies between and within sections could also pafiially be derived. Stbgenera Amanita an'd Lepidella were not supported. The Mappae group was included in section Validae. Grouping hypotheses obtained by DNA analyses are discussed in relation to the distribution of morphological and anatomical chamcters in the studied species. Key words: fungi, basidiomycetes phylogeny, Agarrcales, Amanita systematics, large subunit rDNA, 28S. R6sum6 : A partir d'un groupe de 49 esp,ces d'Amanita prdalablement examinees morphologiquement et anatomiquement, les auteurs ont utilisd la comparaison des s€quences d'ADN pour ddfinir les groupes naturels et les relations phylog6ndtiques de ce genre. Les sdquences de I'ADN nucl6aire codant pour une partie de la grande sous-unit6 ribosomale ont 6t6 ddterminEes et €valu6es en utilisant l'analyse par liaison en lacet avec le voisin (neighbor-joining with bootstrap), l'analyse en parcimonie, le rcgroupement conditionnel et les m€thodes de ressemblance maximale. Les rdsultats confirment substantiellement les sections Afiarira, Caesarea, Uaqinatae, Ualidae, Phalloideae et Amidella, comme groupes monophyldtiques, alors que la monophylie de la section Lepidella demerxe obscure. -
A Nomenclatural Study of Armillaria and Armillariella Species
A Nomenclatural Study of Armillaria and Armillariella species (Basidiomycotina, Tricholomataceae) by Thomas J. Volk & Harold H. Burdsall, Jr. Synopsis Fungorum 8 Fungiflora - Oslo - Norway A Nomenclatural Study of Armillaria and Armillariella species (Basidiomycotina, Tricholomataceae) by Thomas J. Volk & Harold H. Burdsall, Jr. Printed in Eko-trykk A/S, Førde, Norway Printing date: 1. August 1995 ISBN 82-90724-14-4 ISSN 0802-4966 A Nomenclatural Study of Armillaria and Armillariella species (Basidiomycotina, Tricholomataceae) by Thomas J. Volk & Harold H. Burdsall, Jr. Synopsis Fungorum 8 Fungiflora - Oslo - Norway 6 Authors address: Center for Forest Mycology Research Forest Products Laboratory United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service One Gifford Pinchot Dr. Madison, WI 53705 USA ABSTRACT Once a taxonomic refugium for nearly any white-spored agaric with an annulus and attached gills, the concept of the genus Armillaria has been clarified with the neotypification of Armillaria mellea (Vahl:Fr.) Kummer and its acceptance as type species of Armillaria (Fr.:Fr.) Staude. Due to recognition of different type species over the years and an extremely variable generic concept, at least 274 species and varieties have been placed in Armillaria (or in Armillariella Karst., its obligate synonym). Only about forty species belong in the genus Armillaria sensu stricto, while the rest can be placed in forty-three other modem genera. This study is based on original descriptions in the literature, as well as studies of type specimens and generic and species concepts by other authors. This publication consists of an alphabetical listing of all epithets used in Armillaria or Armillariella, with their basionyms, currently accepted names, and other obligate and facultative synonyms. -
LIMACELLA Earle 1909 (F) Pluteaceae (6 Gattungen) Bull.N.Y.Bot.Gard. 5:447,1909 Agaricales (26 Familien) Basidiomycetes SCHLEIMSCHIRMLING
LIMACELLA Earle 1909 (f) Pluteaceae (6 Gattungen) Bull.N.Y.Bot.Gard. 5:447,1909 Agaricales (26 Familien) Basidiomycetes SCHLEIMSCHIRMLING = Amanitella Maire 1913, = Myxoderma Fayod ex Kühner 1926 Typus Agaricus delicatus Fr. (= L. glioderma (Fr.) Maire) Artenzahl Gminder 5, Ludwig 7, Moser 8, Persson 3 (Weltflora: Ainsworth-Bisby 20) Kennzeichnung Bodensaprobiont, seltener an morschem Holz Fruchtkörper kleiner bis großer Blätterpilz von lepiotioidem Habitus, fleischig Hut schleimig, ohne Hüllreste, in recht verschiedenen Farben Lamellen angeheftet bis fast frei, dünn, gedrängt, weiß Stiel zylindrisch-keulig, auch spindelig, trocken oder schleimig, häutig beringt oder mit schleimiger bzw. auch cortinaartiger Ringzone, ohne Volva Fleisch weiß, oft nach Mehl riechend Hyphensepten mit Schnallen Epikutishyphen in Schleim eingebettet Lamellentrama zunächst bilateral, später fast irregulär keine Zystiden Sporenpulver weiß bis hellocker Sporen klein, ellipsoid-kugelig, glatt oder sehr feinwarzig, hyalin, Wandung homogen, inamyloid, nicht cyanophil, bisweilen etwas dextrinoid Bemerkungen Amanita unterscheidet sich durch das Wachstum in Ektomykorrhiza, die geringere oder fehlende Schleimigkeit von Hut und Stiel, das Vorhandensein einer Stielvolva und eines Universalvelums (Hutflocken) und die jung nicht bilaterale Lamellentrama Chamaemyces hat keine schleimigen, allenfalls schmierige Fruchtkörper, freie Lamellen, stärker ockerlich gefärbtes Sporenpulver und große Zystiden Hygrophorus wächst in Ektomykorrhiza, besitzt stärker herablaufende dickliche Lamellen und längere Basidien Literaturhinweise Smith The genus Limacella in N.America Pap.Michigan Acad.Sci.Arts 30:125-147,1944 Singer The Agaricales in modern taxonomy S.430,1975 Krieglsteiner ZfM 49(1):87, 1983; ZfM Beiheft 3:154-155,159-161,1983 Moser Die Röhrlinge und Blätterpilze in Gams Kl. Kryptogamenflora Bd.IIb/2, S.225,1983 Krieglsteiner-Enderle ZfM 53(1):12-13,1987 (L. -
The Macrofungi Checklist of Liguria (Italy): the Current Status of Surveys
Posted November 2008. Summary published in MYCOTAXON 105: 167–170. 2008. The macrofungi checklist of Liguria (Italy): the current status of surveys MIRCA ZOTTI1*, ALFREDO VIZZINI 2, MIDO TRAVERSO3, FABRIZIO BOCCARDO4, MARIO PAVARINO1 & MAURO GIORGIO MARIOTTI1 *[email protected] 1DIP.TE.RIS - Università di Genova - Polo Botanico “Hanbury”, Corso Dogali 1/M, I16136 Genova, Italy 2 MUT- Università di Torino, Dipartimento di Biologia Vegetale, Viale Mattioli 25, I10125 Torino, Italy 3Via San Marino 111/16, I16127 Genova, Italy 4Via F. Bettini 14/11, I16162 Genova, Italy Abstract— The paper is aimed at integrating and updating the first edition of the checklist of Ligurian macrofungi. Data are related to mycological researches carried out mainly in some holm-oak woods through last three years. The new taxa collected amount to 172: 15 of them belonging to Ascomycota and 157 to Basidiomycota. It should be highlighted that 12 taxa have been recorded for the first time in Italy and many species are considered rare or infrequent. Each taxa reported consists of the following items: Latin name, author, habitat, height, and the WGS-84 Global Position System (GPS) coordinates. This work, together with the original Ligurian checklist, represents a contribution to the national checklist. Key words—mycological flora, new reports Introduction Liguria represents a very interesting region from a mycological point of view: macrofungi, directly and not directly correlated to vegetation, are frequent, abundant and quite well distributed among the species. This topic is faced and discussed in Zotti & Orsino (2001). Observations prove an high level of fungal biodiversity (sometimes called “mycodiversity”) since Liguria, though covering only about 2% of the Italian territory, shows more than 36 % of all the species recorded in Italy. -
The Good, the Bad and the Tasty: the Many Roles of Mushrooms
available online at www.studiesinmycology.org STUDIES IN MYCOLOGY 85: 125–157. The good, the bad and the tasty: The many roles of mushrooms K.M.J. de Mattos-Shipley1,2, K.L. Ford1, F. Alberti1,3, A.M. Banks1,4, A.M. Bailey1, and G.D. Foster1* 1School of Biological Sciences, Life Sciences Building, University of Bristol, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1TQ, UK; 2School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Cantock's Close, Bristol, BS8 1TS, UK; 3School of Life Sciences and Department of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK; 4School of Biology, Devonshire Building, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK *Correspondence: G.D. Foster, [email protected] Abstract: Fungi are often inconspicuous in nature and this means it is all too easy to overlook their importance. Often referred to as the “Forgotten Kingdom”, fungi are key components of life on this planet. The phylum Basidiomycota, considered to contain the most complex and evolutionarily advanced members of this Kingdom, includes some of the most iconic fungal species such as the gilled mushrooms, puffballs and bracket fungi. Basidiomycetes inhabit a wide range of ecological niches, carrying out vital ecosystem roles, particularly in carbon cycling and as symbiotic partners with a range of other organisms. Specifically in the context of human use, the basidiomycetes are a highly valuable food source and are increasingly medicinally important. In this review, seven main categories, or ‘roles’, for basidiomycetes have been suggested by the authors: as model species, edible species, toxic species, medicinal basidiomycetes, symbionts, decomposers and pathogens, and two species have been chosen as representatives of each category. -
9B Taxonomy to Genus
Fungus and Lichen Genera in the NEMF Database Taxonomic hierarchy: phyllum > class (-etes) > order (-ales) > family (-ceae) > genus. Total number of genera in the database: 526 Anamorphic fungi (see p. 4), which are disseminated by propagules not formed from cells where meiosis has occurred, are presently not grouped by class, order, etc. Most propagules can be referred to as "conidia," but some are derived from unspecialized vegetative mycelium. A significant number are correlated with fungal states that produce spores derived from cells where meiosis has, or is assumed to have, occurred. These are, where known, members of the ascomycetes or basidiomycetes. However, in many cases, they are still undescribed, unrecognized or poorly known. (Explanation paraphrased from "Dictionary of the Fungi, 9th Edition.") Principal authority for this taxonomy is the Dictionary of the Fungi and its online database, www.indexfungorum.org. For lichens, see Lecanoromycetes on p. 3. Basidiomycota Aegerita Poria Macrolepiota Grandinia Poronidulus Melanophyllum Agaricomycetes Hyphoderma Postia Amanitaceae Cantharellales Meripilaceae Pycnoporellus Amanita Cantharellaceae Abortiporus Skeletocutis Bolbitiaceae Cantharellus Antrodia Trichaptum Agrocybe Craterellus Grifola Tyromyces Bolbitius Clavulinaceae Meripilus Sistotremataceae Conocybe Clavulina Physisporinus Trechispora Hebeloma Hydnaceae Meruliaceae Sparassidaceae Panaeolina Hydnum Climacodon Sparassis Clavariaceae Polyporales Gloeoporus Steccherinaceae Clavaria Albatrellaceae Hyphodermopsis Antrodiella -
Phd. Thesis Sana Jabeen.Pdf
ECTOMYCORRHIZAL FUNGAL COMMUNITIES ASSOCIATED WITH HIMALAYAN CEDAR FROM PAKISTAN A dissertation submitted to the University of the Punjab in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in BOTANY by SANA JABEEN DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY UNIVERSITY OF THE PUNJAB LAHORE, PAKISTAN JUNE 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTENTS PAGE NO. Summary i Dedication iii Acknowledgements iv CHAPTER 1 Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2 Literature review 5 Aims and objectives 11 CHAPTER 3 Materials and methods 12 3.1. Sampling site description 12 3.2. Sampling strategy 14 3.3. Sampling of sporocarps 14 3.4. Sampling and preservation of fruit bodies 14 3.5. Morphological studies of fruit bodies 14 3.6. Sampling of morphotypes 15 3.7. Soil sampling and analysis 15 3.8. Cleaning, morphotyping and storage of ectomycorrhizae 15 3.9. Morphological studies of ectomycorrhizae 16 3.10. Molecular studies 16 3.10.1. DNA extraction 16 3.10.2. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) 17 3.10.3. Sequence assembly and data mining 18 3.10.4. Multiple alignments and phylogenetic analysis 18 3.11. Climatic data collection 19 3.12. Statistical analysis 19 CHAPTER 4 Results 22 4.1. Characterization of above ground ectomycorrhizal fungi 22 4.2. Identification of ectomycorrhizal host 184 4.3. Characterization of non ectomycorrhizal fruit bodies 186 4.4. Characterization of saprobic fungi found from fruit bodies 188 4.5. Characterization of below ground ectomycorrhizal fungi 189 4.6. Characterization of below ground non ectomycorrhizal fungi 193 4.7. Identification of host taxa from ectomycorrhizal morphotypes 195 4.8. -
Classification of Amanita Species Based on Bilinear Networks With
agriculture Article Classification of Amanita Species Based on Bilinear Networks with Attention Mechanism Peng Wang, Jiang Liu, Lijia Xu, Peng Huang, Xiong Luo, Yan Hu and Zhiliang Kang * College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an 625000, China; [email protected] (P.W.); [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (L.X.); [email protected] (P.H.); [email protected] (X.L.); [email protected] (Y.H.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-186-0835-1703 Abstract: The accurate classification of Amanita is helpful to its research on biological control and medical value, and it can also prevent mushroom poisoning incidents. In this paper, we constructed the Bilinear convolutional neural networks (B-CNN) with attention mechanism model based on transfer learning to realize the classification of Amanita. When the model is trained, the weight on ImageNet is used for pre-training, and the Adam optimizer is used to update network parameters. In the test process, images of Amanita at different growth stages were used to further test the generalization ability of the model. After comparing our model with other models, the results show that our model greatly reduces the number of parameters while achieving high accuracy (95.2%) and has good generalization ability. It is an efficient classification model, which provides a new option for mushroom classification in areas with limited computing resources. Keywords: deep learning; bilinear convolutional neural networks; attention mechanism; trans- fer learning Citation: Wang, P.; Liu, J.; Xu, L.; Huang, P.; Luo, X.; Hu, Y.; Kang, Z. -
Fungi of National Park Mavrovo
Project “Protection, Economic Development and Promotion of Eco Tourism in Mavrovo National Park” Fungi of National Park Mavrovo Final Report Mitko Karadelev Institute of Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Ss Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Macedonia 1 Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Review of Fungi Research in the Area 5 3. Inventory of Fungi Species in Mavrovo NP 7 3.1. Fungi Species from Mavrovo NP on European Fungi Red List 8 3.2. Fungi Species from Mavrovo NP on Preliminary Red List of Macedonia 14 3.3. Threatened Fungi Species from Mavrovo NP - Candidates for Listing in Appendix I of the Bern Convention 17 3.4. Threatened Fungi Species Included in ECCF Atlas of 50 Threatened European Species 18 3.5. Macrofungi Known Only from Mavrovo NP in Macedonia 20 3.6. New Fungi Species for Macedonia Recorded for the First Time from Mavrovo NP in 2009-2010 22 3.7. Species from Mavrovo NP with Globally Significant Status 29 3.8. Key Species from Mavrovo NP 30 4. Species and Habitat Analysis 34 4.1. Edible and Toxic Species in MNR 42 5. Conservation Problems 46 5.1. Gaps in Knowledge of Macromycetes 46 5.2. Fragility 47 6. Protection Measures 47 7. Prime Mushroom Areas 49 8. Recommendations 54 9. References 55 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Annex I: List of Published Fungi Species from MNP Annex II: Full List of Recorded Fungi Species from MNP Annex III: List of New Species for MNP (Project Results) Annex IV: List of Edible and Poisonous Fungi in MNP Annex V: List of New Species for MK 2 1. -
Collecting and Recording Fungi
British Mycological Society Recording Network Guidance Notes COLLECTING AND RECORDING FUNGI A revision of the Guide to Recording Fungi previously issued (1994) in the BMS Guides for the Amateur Mycologist series. Edited by Richard Iliffe June 2004 (updated August 2006) © British Mycological Society 2006 Table of contents Foreword 2 Introduction 3 Recording 4 Collecting fungi 4 Access to foray sites and the country code 5 Spore prints 6 Field books 7 Index cards 7 Computers 8 Foray Record Sheets 9 Literature for the identification of fungi 9 Help with identification 9 Drying specimens for a herbarium 10 Taxonomy and nomenclature 12 Recent changes in plant taxonomy 12 Recent changes in fungal taxonomy 13 Orders of fungi 14 Nomenclature 15 Synonymy 16 Morph 16 The spore stages of rust fungi 17 A brief history of fungus recording 19 The BMS Fungal Records Database (BMSFRD) 20 Field definitions 20 Entering records in BMSFRD format 22 Locality 22 Associated organism, substrate and ecosystem 22 Ecosystem descriptors 23 Recommended terms for the substrate field 23 Fungi on dung 24 Examples of database field entries 24 Doubtful identifications 25 MycoRec 25 Recording using other programs 25 Manuscript or typescript records 26 Sending records electronically 26 Saving and back-up 27 Viruses 28 Making data available - Intellectual property rights 28 APPENDICES 1 Other relevant publications 30 2 BMS foray record sheet 31 3 NCC ecosystem codes 32 4 Table of orders of fungi 34 5 Herbaria in UK and Europe 35 6 Help with identification 36 7 Useful contacts 39 8 List of Fungus Recording Groups 40 9 BMS Keys – list of contents 42 10 The BMS website 43 11 Copyright licence form 45 12 Guidelines for field mycologists: the practical interpretation of Section 21 of the Drugs Act 2005 46 1 Foreword In June 2000 the British Mycological Society Recording Network (BMSRN), as it is now known, held its Annual Group Leaders’ Meeting at Littledean, Gloucestershire. -
Mycology Praha
f I VO LUM E 52 I / I [ 1— 1 DECEMBER 1999 M y c o l o g y l CZECH SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY FOR MYCOLOGY PRAHA J\AYCn nI .O §r%u v J -< M ^/\YC/-\ ISSN 0009-°476 n | .O r%o v J -< Vol. 52, No. 1, December 1999 CZECH MYCOLOGY ! formerly Česká mykologie published quarterly by the Czech Scientific Society for Mycology EDITORIAL BOARD Editor-in-Cliief ; ZDENĚK POUZAR (Praha) ; Managing editor JAROSLAV KLÁN (Praha) j VLADIMÍR ANTONÍN (Brno) JIŘÍ KUNERT (Olomouc) ! OLGA FASSATIOVÁ (Praha) LUDMILA MARVANOVÁ (Brno) | ROSTISLAV FELLNER (Praha) PETR PIKÁLEK (Praha) ; ALEŠ LEBEDA (Olomouc) MIRKO SVRČEK (Praha) i Czech Mycology is an international scientific journal publishing papers in all aspects of 1 mycology. Publication in the journal is open to members of the Czech Scientific Society i for Mycology and non-members. | Contributions to: Czech Mycology, National Museum, Department of Mycology, Václavské 1 nám. 68, 115 79 Praha 1, Czech Republic. Phone: 02/24497259 or 96151284 j SUBSCRIPTION. Annual subscription is Kč 350,- (including postage). The annual sub scription for abroad is US $86,- or DM 136,- (including postage). The annual member ship fee of the Czech Scientific Society for Mycology (Kč 270,- or US $60,- for foreigners) includes the journal without any other additional payment. For subscriptions, address changes, payment and further information please contact The Czech Scientific Society for ! Mycology, P.O.Box 106, 11121 Praha 1, Czech Republic. This journal is indexed or abstracted in: i Biological Abstracts, Abstracts of Mycology, Chemical Abstracts, Excerpta Medica, Bib liography of Systematic Mycology, Index of Fungi, Review of Plant Pathology, Veterinary Bulletin, CAB Abstracts, Rewicw of Medical and Veterinary Mycology. -
Index of Synonyms
Index of Synonyms Current Name in Boldface Synonym Codes: A Autonym: species is listed as a collective term (V) and its autonym is a separate entry (A), and the two taxa are not linked as synonyms C Complex: taxon is thought to comprise more than one species (see Group) D Dated: homotypic synonym not in use for decades E Exotic: name of a foreign species applied to more local species, which may be distinct G Group: taxon is thought to comprise more than one species (see Complex) H Homotypic Synonym L Lumped: multiple taxa determined to be a single species M Misapplied: taxon has been used in a sense which is different from that as represented by the type of the name O Orthographic Error: spelling variant or error, or gender of genus has been misconstrued S Split: determined to be separate species U Unclear: it has not been established what the taxon should be V Varieties: species is listed as a collective term (V) and its autonym is a separate entry (A), and the two taxa are not linked as synonyms X Extra: taxon is listed in index, but has never been reported in the collection area Abortiporus biennis Abortiporus biennis (Bull.:Fr.) Sing. Polyporus biennis Abortiporus fractipes Abortiporus fractipes (Berk.&Curt.)Gilbn.&Ryv. Polyporus fractipes Acetabula vulgaris Acetabula vulgaris Helvella acetabulum (L.ex Fr.)Quel. Paxina acetabulum (L.ex St.Amans)Kuntze Peziza acetabulum L.ex Fr. Sunday, April 24, 2011 Page 1 of 418 Aegerita candida Aegerita candida Pers. Agaricus abruptibulbus Agaricus abruptibulbus Peck Agaricus abruptus Pk.