SMART METERS (Docket No
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
OPEN MEETING AGENDA ITEM ORIGINAL TO: Docket Control 00001 45981 ~ ~~ Director Utilities Division DATE: June 28,2013 RE: INVESTIGATION OF SMART METERS (Docket No. E-00000C-11-0328) Staff is submitting the following three reports regarding the health effects of smart meters for review. These reports include: 0 Public Utility Commission of Texas, Project No. 40190, Project Relating to Advanced Metering Issues (2012). 0 Vermont Department of Health, Radio Frequency Radiation and Health: Smart Meters (2012). 0 Richard Tell Associates, An Evaluation of Radio Frequency Fields Produced by Smart Meters Deployed in Vermont (2013). Staff submits these reports for informational purposes. If the Commission desires to have its own independent study of the health effects of smart meters, Staff recommends that the Commission request that such a study be conducted by the Arizona Department of Health Services. SMO:EAH:tdp/MAS Originator: Eric A. Hill Service List For: Generic Investigation - Energy Policy Act of 1992 Docket No: E-00000C-11-0328 Michael Cepuch Thomas Mumaw 2949 E. Shgri-La Rd P.O. Box 53999, Station 8695 Phoenix, Arizona 85028 Phoenix, Arizona 85072-3999 Jeff Woner K.R. Michael Curtis Saline 8z Associates, PLC 501 East Thomas Road 160 N. Pasadena, Ste 101 Phoenix, Arizona 85012-3205 Mesa ,Arizona 85201 6/20/2013 William Sullivan Warren Woodward 501 East Thomas Road 55 Ross Circle Phoenix, Arizona 85012-3205 Sedona, Arizona 86336 Charles Moore Cynthia Zwick 1878 W. White Mountain Blvd. 2700 N. Third St. - 3040 Lakeside, Arizona 85929 Phoenix, Arizona 85004 Tyler Carlson Patrick Black P.O. Box 1045 Fennemore Craig, P.C Bullhead City, Arizona 86430 2394 E. Camelback Rd, Ste 600 Phoenix, Arizona 85016 Peggy Gillman Mohave Electric Cooperative, Inc. C. Webb Crockett P.O. Box 1045 Fennemore Craig, P.C Bullhead City, Arizona 86430 2394 E. Camelback Rd, Ste 600 Phoenix, Arizona 85016 M. Jo Smith 88 E. Broadway Elizabeth Kelley Tucson, Arizona 85701 Electromagnetic Safety Alliannce, Inc 303 N. Gaia P1 Bradley Carroll Tucson, Arizona 85745 88 E. Broadway Blvd. MS HQE910 P.O. Box 71 1 Fxank Mead Tucson, Arizona 85702 2141 E. Highland Ave., Ste. 105 Phoenix, Arizona 85016 Michael Patten Roshka DeWulf & Patten, PLC Jeffkey Johnson One Arizona Center Arizona Public Service Company 400 E. Van B~renSt. - 800 P.O. Box 53999, STA. 9905 Phoenix, Arizona 85004 Phoenix, Arizona 85072-3999 John Wallace 120 N. 44th St. - 100 Phoenix, Arizona 85034 ~ ATTACMENT 1 Donna L. Nelson Rick Perry Chairman Governor Kenneth W, Anderson, Jr. Commissioner Rolando Psblos Commisrioaer Brian €I.Lloyd Execative Director Public Utility Commission of Texas Date: December 17,2012 To: Chairman Donna L. Nelson Commissioner Kenneth W. Anderson, Jr. Commissioner Rolando Pablos From: Alan Rivaldo Infrastructure & Reliability Division Subject: Project No. 40190, Project Relating to Advanced Metering Issues Report on Health and Radiojkquency Electromagnetic Fiel&Ji.oRzAdvanced Meters Recently, some citizens of Texas have expressed concern over the potential health effects of exposure to the radiofiequency emissions fiom the wireless technology of advanced metering. Some of the& individuals have appeared before or submitted comments to the Commission (under Project 40190, Project Relating to Advanced Metering Issues) and the Texas Senate Committee on Business and Commerce (at http://www.senate.state.tx.us/75r/senate/co~t/c51O/c51O.htm). Some have relied on social media as a source of information because it disseminates ideas rapidly and widely, but it also can be inaccurate and lack objectivity. Therefore, Staff decided to investigate the health concem expressed by citizens and other interested parties. The product of this investigation is the attached document intended to objectively address the issue and help inform decision makers. Staff reviewed recent research on the potential health effects of radio fkequency electromagnetic field (RF EMF), reported on the findings, and assessed disputes regarding the findings. Staff found many scientific research papers published on the effects of EMF on health over a period of nearly 90 years; they number in the thousands. Despite this extensive body of work, scientific research continues, and dozens of papers are published each year. Stafl has determined that the large body of scientific research reveals no definite or proven biological ejJiects porn exposure to low-level RF signals. Further, Stagfound no credible evidence to suggest that advanced meters emit harm@ amounts of EMF. While many different organizations have performed Primary research on health and RF EMF, Staff relied heavily on the following sources: 1. The California Council on Science and Technology (CCST), an independent state agency, assessed the available evidence of whether FCC standards provide sufficient protection of public health. Its report also questioned whether additional standads are needed to ensure adequate protection fkom adverse health effects of wireless communication technology. 2. The Michigan Public Service Commission requested help from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) in assessing claims made by some individuals who refuted the findings of the CCST report. The PUCT report summarizes the LBNL work. 3. The measurements and assessments per€omed by the Electrical Power Research Institute (EPFU), an organization that perfoms research and provides technical expertise to the electrical utility industry. Stafffound the CCST conclusions, LBNL 's work, and the investigations by EPRI to be highly credible and based on sound scientijk principles. Other material Staff reviewed, found valuable, and used to inform the report came fkom: 0 The federal government (FCC, NIH, and other agencies); 0 The Canadian government and its provincial health authorities; Countries in Western Europe; 0 Several municipalities deploying advanced meters; 0 Various governmental entities in Australia; 0 Academia; 0 The United Nations' World Health Organization; 0 Utility industry org&tions; and 0 International standards-settingsorganizations. Alan Rivaldo is available to answer any questions you may have. 2 Healt and RF EMF from Advanced Meters An Overview of Recent Investigations and Analyses Public Utility Commission of Texas Infrastructure & Reliability Division Staff Report Prepared by Alan Rivaldo Project No. 4019 December 2012 This document is work supported by the Department of Energy under award numbers DE-OE0000092 and DE-OE0000180. Any views presented in this paper do not necessarily represent a Commission decision. Health and RF EMF from Advanced Meters ii Public Utility Commksion of Texas Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 The Science .............................................................................................................................................................. 6 Background - Radiation, Science ........................................................................................................................ 6 Radiation .........................................................................................................................................................6 Figure 1: Chart ofthe Electromagnetic Spectrum ........................................................................................... 7 Figure 2: Types of Radiation and Their Frequency Ranges ............................................................................. 8 Fgure 3: Calculated Average Power Density vs . Distance for a Typical Smart Meter .................................... 9 The Scientific Method. the Value of Meta.analysis. Laymen Difficulties. and other Cautions ..................... 14 Recent Studies and Expert Opinions ..................................................................................................................... 24 California Council on Science and Technology Report and Responses ............................................................. 24 Response to CCST Report: County of Santa Cruz Health Services Agency .................................................... 24 Michigan Public Service Commission: SGTAP Assessment of Santa Crut Memo.......................................... 25 Michigan Public Service Commission: SGTAP Assessment of AAEM Submittal ............................................ 26 Table 1: SGTAP Assessment Using Hill Criteria ............................................................................................. 28 Electric Power Research Institute ..................................................................................................................... 30 EPRl Technical Report on RF Emissions from Two Models of Smart Meters ................................................ 30 EPRl Comments on the Santa Cruz and AAEM Memoranda ......................................................................... 32 Table 2: EPRl Findings - Radio Frequency Levels from Various Sources ...................................................... 37 EPRl Comments on Sage Report ................................................................................................................... 38 Joint White Paper of EEI, UTC, and AEIC ..........................................................................................................