Workers, Managers, Productivity Kaizen in Developing Countries

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Workers, Managers, Productivity Kaizen in Developing Countries Workers, Managers, Productivity Kaizen in Developing Countries Edited by Akio Hosono · John Page · Go Shimada Workers, Managers, Productivity Akio Hosono • John Page • Go Shimada Editors Workers, Managers, Productivity Kaizen in Developing Countries Editors Akio Hosono John Page JICA Research Institute The Brookings Institution Tokyo, Japan Washington, DC, USA Go Shimada School of Information and Communication Meiji University Tokyo, Japan ISBN 978-981-15-0363-4 ISBN 978-981-15-0364-1 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0364-1 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2020 This book is an open access publication. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the pub- lisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institu- tional affiliations. This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. The registered company address is: 152 Beach Road, #21-­01/04 Gateway East, Singapore 189721, Singapore FOREWORD Development practitioners and researchers have long been confronted to the reality of a productivity gap between developed and developing coun- tries. However, the role of management methods as an important deter- minant for quality and productivity outcomes has only surfaced in the recent past, and little is known about the effectiveness of initiatives that aim to increase managerial capital and improve productivity in the private or public sector in developing countries. Kaizen, as a model that has attracted much attention and captured imaginations from the 1960s on, and that has been adopted in many firms all over the world, provides an interesting lens to study the mechanisms at stakes. Kaizen can be defined as an inclusive and participatory approach to continuous improvement in quality and productivity, rooted in a distinctive philosophy and using spe- cific tools and methods. In 2015, the Japan International Cooperation Agency—Research Institute (JICA-RI) and the Global Development Network (GDN) felt that there would be high value in taking stock of the experiences of the various initiatives that disseminated and implemented Kaizen in different contexts and hence decided to join forces to document the adoption of Kaizen approaches. This partnership was based on shared interests and strong complemen- tarity. JICA-RI, the research arm of JICA, had invested much in private sector development. It was particularly interested in assessing how a now famous Japanese innovation, dating back to the 1960s and that it contrib- uted to disseminate, can unleash innovation and productivity gains in v vi FOREWORD developing country firms. GDN, a public international organization devoted to building research capacity in social sciences in developing countries, had supported research on productivity and industrial policies. It reckoned that a firm-based approach would provide both ample ground for capacity development and an opportunity to learn more about the driving forces underpinning the adoption of new managerial practices and their impact as a complement to research work on the conduct and impact of industrial policies. This book is the product of this cooperation, which involved research- ers from developing countries and Kaizen practitioners who worked on specific case studies and three co-editors, Akio Hosono, John Page, and Go Shimada who took the leadership in directing the book toward a coherent and meaningful object. It also involved researchers who advised research teams while they conducted their research, and we are grateful to Jocelyn Olivari, Aniceto Orbeta, and Tetsushi Sonobe for their comments and reviews. Because a book like this is more than a collection of individ- ual studies, the contributors gathered several times in Tokyo, Nagoya, Bangkok, and Washington to discuss their research, identify commonali- ties and differences across context, and learn from the experience of each other. We hence hope to have planted the seed of a community of research- ers in developed and developing countries interested in the dissemination and implementation of Kaizen approaches. Through the voices of its co-editors, developing country researchers, and Kaizen practitioners, the book aims to present the diversity of Kaizen approaches in firms in developing countries and to address a number of a questions related to their effectiveness. Going beyond a traditional theory of firms, and by providing a deep dive into the intervention mechanisms used to introduce and sustain Kaizen, it also aims to put in the organiza- tions- and countries-specific context the different experiences it describes. Such a book usually raises more question than it answers, but we hope it will provide the reader with an understanding of the mechanisms through which Kaizen initiatives may or may not work, how is Kaizen shaping the relations between workers and managers and the conditions for its adop- tion in a variety of firms from SMEs to Multinational corporations. We would like to thank the book’s chapter authors for their unerring dedicated involvement and the three co-editors Akio Hosono, John Page and Go Shimada for their invaluable analytical and editorial contributions. FOREWORD vii We would also like to add here a special word for our colleague, Professor Nestor Raneses who led the work on Chap. 13 on the MPex Program in the Philippines and express our deep sadness at his passing before the pub- lication of this book. Global Development Network, New Delhi, India Pierre Jacquet JICA Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan Izumi Ohno ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The editors are most grateful to the Global Development Network (GDN), Japan International Cooperation Agency Research Institute (JICA-RI), and the Brookings Institution, which provided efficient logis- tical support for our research, the organization of authors’ workshops, and the preparation of this volume. The editors would like to extend their deepest gratitude to the President of GDN, Pierre Jaquet, and former and current directors of JICA-RI, Ichiro Tambo, Naohiro Kitano, Nobuko Kayashima, and Izumi Ohno, who all supported us during the process of conceiving, proposing, and carrying out the research project. The editors would like to express their sincerest thanks to advisers to the research and writing of case-study chapters: Tetsushi Sonobe, the National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS), shared many valuable insights with us in the course of the project. The editors deeply appreciate valuable suggestions from Tsuyoshi Kikuchi, Japan Development Services Co., Ltd., Hiroyuki Tomita, JICA, and William Maloney, the World Bank. The editors would also like to express special gratitude to several orga- nizations that allowed us and the chapter authors to learn about the imple- mentation, significance, and nature ofKaizen on site: Toyota Motor Corporation, Tahara Plant, Aichi, Japan, Denso (Thailand) Co., Ltd., Samrong Plant, Samutprakarn, Thailand, and Thai-Nichi Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand. We appreciate the support of the JICA Offices in Bangkok, Nagoya, and Washington as well. The editors and chapter authors would like to express their deep appre- ciation to those who supported the research and writing of individual ix x ACKNOWLEDGMENTS chapters: members of the Malaysia Productivity Corporation (MPC), Petaling Jaya, Malaysia; Leo Guzman-Anaya, University of Guadalajara, Mexico; members of the Brazilian Development Bank (BNDES); mem- bers of the Institute of Applied Economic Research (IPEA), Brazil; mem- bers of the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB); Fekadu Nigussie Deresse, Agriculture Transformation Agency (ATA); Ethiopia; Girum Abebe Tefera, Ethiopian Development Research Institute (EDRI); Mekonnen Yaie, and Seblewongel Hargawin, Ethiopia Kaizen Institute (EKI); Nigusse Gebre Gebremedhin, Federal TVET Agency (FTA), Ethiopia; Gebeyehu Benti, Yasuto Kikuma, and Hiroyuki Tanana, JICA Ethiopia Office; Getafun Tadesse Mekonnen, Ethiopia; members of the Automotive Industry Development Centre (AIDC), Rosslyn, South Africa; Jocelyn Olivera, Universidad Alfonso Ibanez, Chile; Aniceto Orbeta,
Recommended publications
  • Pacifism in the Constitution of Japan and Strategies of National Security
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Tsukuba Repository Pacifism in the Constitution of Japan and Strategies of National Security 著者 Hirayama Asaji, Silver Tim 内容記述 Japanese version (平山朝治「日本国憲法の平和 主義と、安全保障戦略」『国際日本研究』第7号 http://hdl.handle.net/2241/00124619 )was published in March 2015. Translated from Japanese version by Tim Silver (Master of Pacific Studies, UCSD) and Asaji Hirayama. year 2015 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2241/00125662 PACIFISM IN THE CONSTITUTION OF JAPAN AND STRATEGIES OF NATIONAL SECURITY ENGLISH VERSION ⓒ Asaji Hirayama, 2015. Japanese version (平山朝治「日本国憲法の平和主義と、安全保障戦略」『国際日本研究』第7号 http://hdl.handle.net/2241/00124619 )was published in March 2015. Translated from Japanese version by Tim Silver (Master of Pacific Studies, UCSD) and Asaji Hirayama. Pay-off matrices and theoretical explanations of Japanese version are replaced with daily expressions according to the advice of Professor Takeo Hoshi (Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center, Stanford University). The matrices appear in Appendix of English version. Cover photographs: Piazza San Marco ⓒ Hinako Hirayama Masks ⓒ National Noh Theatre Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Legislative Intent of Article 9 and Efforts to Hide that Intent ....................................................................... 4 (1) MacArthur’s true intentions ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Unconditional Surrender, the Emperor and the Tokyo Trial 59
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Unconditional Surrender, the Emperor and the Tokyo Trial 59 Unconditional Surrender, the Emperor and the Tokyo Trial: Implications for the Present-Day Japan-US Alliance Kazuhiko TOGO 無条件降伏・天皇・東京裁判: 現在の日米同盟に対して有する意味合い 東 郷 和 彦 <Abstract> In August 1945, when Japan was on the brink of total defeat, opinions among Japanese top leaders on when and how to surrender were divided, although everyone agreed that one condition would have to be met before any surrender: the preservation of the Imperial House. The Potsdam Declaration had been formulated in such a manner that this issue was left ambiguous. The final US reply, however, allowed sufficient room for the interpre- tation that the Imperial House would be preserved. So the Japanese Government surrendered. Since the surrender was only based on this interpretation, the defeated Government’s immediate efforts were concentrated on realiz- ing this condition through the establishment of a new Constitution (Article One) and the Tokyo Trial (not indicting the Emperor). Thus the final and only condition of the falling Empire was met. However, the crucial aspect of “honoring the commitment” was forgotten through a prevailing notion that Japan had made an unconditional surrender and that the US occupation was using the Emperor for the expediency of its occupation policy. After the signing of the San Francisco Peace Treaty even the Japanese Government itself began to acknowledge that Japan had indeed made an unconditional surrender. It is time to go back into history and recall this forgotten commit- ment in order to consolidate the contemporary Japan-US alliance.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan in the World, the World in Japan
    Japan in the World, the World in Japan Japan in the World, the World in Japan Fifty Years of Japanese Studies at Michigan Edited by the Center for Japanese Studies, The University of Michigan The Center for Japanese Studies The University of Michigan Ann Arbor, 2001 Open access edition funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities/ Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Humanities Open Book Program. 2001 The Regents of the University of Michigan Published by the Center for Japanese Studies, The University of Michigan, 202 S. Thayer St., Ann Arbor, MI 48104-1608 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Japan in the world, the world in Japan : fifty years of Japanese studies at Michigan / edited by the Center for Japanese Studies, the University of Michigan. p. cm. ISBN 0-939512-95-5 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Japan—Study and teaching (Higher)—United States. 2. University of Michigan. Center for Japanese Studies—History. I. University of Michigan. Center for Japanese Studies. DS834.95J318 2001 952.0071'173—dc21 00-064354 Cover design by Seiko Semones This book was set in Garamond. This publication meets the ANSI/NISO Standards for Permanence of Paper for Publications and Documents in Libraries and Archives (Z39.48-1992). Published in the United States of America ISBN 978-0-939512-95-9 (paper) ISBN 978-0-472-12796-2 (ebook) ISBN 978-0-472-90192-0 (open access) The text of this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Contents Note on Personal Names viii Preface ix Hitomi Tonomura Opening Remarks 1 Philip H.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Inclusive Industrial Development and Development Aid of Japan – New opportunities for pro-poor regional cooperation through inclusive business in the Mekong region Go Shimada1 Associate Professor, University of Shizuoka Visiting Scholar, Columbia University [email protected], [email protected] Summary. – This paper aims to analyze the factors that have made the economic growth of Japan inclusive in the post-World War II period. The factors identified in this paper are: (1) the GHQ policy to transition Japan from the old regime to a democratic, non-autocratic and non-military country; (2) inclusive industrial development, especially through productivity movement, transferring the relationship with labor from confrontational to constructive; and (3) social security policy, such as UHC (Universal Health Care), to protect people from poverty and starvation, and to improve living standards. These factors are reflected in Japanese ODA policy on poverty reduction. This paper focuses mainly on inclusive industrial development because this is one aspect that East Asian countries have in common, and a good common ground to consider possible future collaboration among East Asian countries to reduce poverty in the region. For future possible collaboration among Japan, China and South Korea, this paper proposes the “horizontal collaboration” approaches. In horizontal collaboration, each donor will implement projects independently, but in parallel under the coordination of the ADB. The projects could be implemented geographically in any sector. The new programs and projects should be implemented in a “starting from small to grow bigger” approach (or a “gradual” approach). This paper proposes to start from an exchange of ideas, good practices, and history, among staff members of donor agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacifism in the Constitution of Japan and Strategies of National Security English Version
    PACIFISM IN THE CONSTITUTION OF JAPAN AND STRATEGIES OF NATIONAL SECURITY ENGLISH VERSION ⓒ Asaji Hirayama, 2015. Japanese version (平山朝治「日本国憲法の平和主義と、安全保障戦略」『国際日本研究』第7号 http://hdl.handle.net/2241/00124619 )was published in March 2015. Translated from Japanese version by Tim Silver (Master of Pacific Studies, UCSD) and Asaji Hirayama. Pay-off matrices and theoretical explanations of Japanese version are replaced with daily expressions according to the advice of Professor Takeo Hoshi (Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center, Stanford University). The matrices appear in Appendix of English version. Cover photographs: Piazza San Marco ⓒ Hinako Hirayama Masks ⓒ National Noh Theatre Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Legislative Intent of Article 9 and Efforts to Hide that Intent ....................................................................... 4 (1) MacArthur’s true intentions ......................................................................................................................... 4 (2) Shigeru Yoshida’s distorted response ........................................................................................................... 9 (3) The truth of the Ashida Amendment .......................................................................................................... 11 (4) Suspicion that Ashida stole the Tan theory ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]