DOCSLIB.ORG

Regional Rail Link – Section 1: Flora and Fauna Assessment, and Net Gain Analysis, Southern Cross Station to Deer Park, Victoria

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regional Rail Link – Section 1: Flora and Fauna Assessment, and Net Gain Analysis, Southern Cross Station to Deer Park, Victoria FINAL REPORT: Regional Rail Link – Section 1: Flora and Fauna Assessment, and Net Gain Analysis, Southern Cross Station to Deer Park, Victoria ON BEHALF OF: Department of Transport August 2010 Ecology Partners Pty Ltd Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................ 6 1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 10 1.1 Background .............................................................................................. 10 1.2 Scope of Assessment............................................................................... 10 1.3 Study Area ............................................................................................... 11 2 Methods .................................................................................................. 12 2.1 Nomenclature ........................................................................................... 12 2.2 Literature Review ..................................................................................... 12 2.3 Database Searches .................................................................................. 12 2.4 Vegetation Assessment ............................................................................ 13 2.5 Net Gain Analysis ..................................................................................... 13 2.6 Fauna Survey ........................................................................................... 15 2.7 Aquatic Survey ......................................................................................... 16 2.8 Targeted Flora and Fauna Surveys .......................................................... 17 2.8.1 Targeted Flora Surveys ...................................................................................................17 2.8.2 Targeted Fauna Surveys .................................................................................................18 2.9 Assessment Qualifications and Limitations .............................................. 25 3 Results .................................................................................................... 27 3.1 Flora Species ........................................................................................... 27 3.2 Ecological Vegetation Classes ................................................................. 27 3.2.1 Vegetation condition .......................................................................................................28 3.3 Significant Flora Species and Communities ............................................. 32 3.3.1 National .............................................................................................................................33 3.3.2 State ..................................................................................................................................36 3.3.3 Regional and local ...........................................................................................................36 3.3.4 Significant communities .................................................................................................36 3.3.5 Best or remaining 50% habitat for rare and threatened flora species .......................37 3.4 Terrestrial Fauna Species ........................................................................ 39 3.5 Aquatic Fauna Species ............................................................................ 40 3.6 Fauna Habitat ........................................................................................... 41 2 Regional Rail Link – Section 1: Flora and Fauna Assessment, and Net Gain Analysis 3.7 Significant Fauna ..................................................................................... 44 3.7.1 National .............................................................................................................................44 3.7.2 State ..................................................................................................................................45 3.7.3 Regional and local ...........................................................................................................46 3.7.4 Best or remaining 50% habitat for threatened fauna species .....................................47 3.8 Ecological Significance of Study Area ...................................................... 48 3.9 Reasons for Significance .......................................................................... 48 3.10 Previous Assessments ............................................................................. 49 3.11 Adjacent Areas of Ecological Significance ............................................... 49 3.12 BioSites .................................................................................................... 50 4 Implications of the Findings .................................................................. 51 4.1 Legislative and Policy Implications ........................................................... 51 4.1.1 Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwth) ................51 4.1.2 Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 (Vic) ...................................................................54 4.1.3 Catchment and Land Protection Act 1994 ....................................................................55 4.1.4 Planning and Environment Act 1987 .............................................................................56 4.1.5 Wildlife Act 1975 and Wildlife Regulations 2002 ..........................................................57 5 Net Gain Analysis ................................................................................... 59 5.1 Habitat Hectare Calculations .................................................................... 59 Summary of Net Gain Habitat Hectare and Tree Assessments ...............................................65 5.2 Avoidance and Minimisation (First two steps) .......................................... 65 5.3 Offset Calculations (Step three) ............................................................... 66 6 Ecological Values and Management Measures ................................... 67 6.1 Ecological Values ..................................................................................... 67 6.1.1 Maribyrnong River ...........................................................................................................67 6.1.2 Tottenham to Sunshine ...................................................................................................69 6.1.3 Kororoit Creek ..................................................................................................................71 6.1.4 Kororoit Creek to Robinsons Road, Deer Park ............................................................73 7 Conclusion .............................................................................................. 74 Figures ............................................................................................................... 76 Appendices ...................................................................................................... 144 3 Regional Rail Link – Section 1: Flora and Fauna Assessment, and Net Gain Analysis References....................................................................................................... 183 Plates Plate 1. Striped Legless Lizard (Source: Ecology Partners Pty. Ltd.) ............................. 18 Plate 2. Golden Sun Moth (Source: Ecology Partners Pty. Ltd.) ..................................... 20 Plate 3. Growling Grass Frog (Source: Ecology Partners Pty. Ltd.) ................................ 22 Plate 4. Fat-tailed Dunnart (Ecology Partners Pty. Ltd.) .................................................. 24 Plate 5: Spiny Rice-flower. ................................................................................................ 34 Plate 6: Sunshine Diuris. .................................................................................................. 35 Tables Table 1. Habitat zones and their threatened species rating within the study area. ......... 37 Table 1. Aquatic species recorded at waterways within the study area. ......................... 40 Table 2. Habitat zones and their threatened species rating within the study area. ......... 47 Table 3. Threatening processes under the Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 applicable to the proposed construction works. ....................................................... 55 Table 4. Quantity and significance of native vegetation patches. ................................... 60 Table 5. Quantity and significance of native vegetation patches. ................................... 61 Table 6. Quantity and significance of native vegetation patches. ................................... 62 Table 7. Quantity and significance of native vegetation patches. ................................... 63 Table 8. Quantity and significance of native vegetation patches. ................................... 64 Table A1.1. Rare or Threatened categories for listed Victorian taxa. ............................ 145 Table A1.2. Defining Ecological Significance. ................................................................ 147 Table A1.3. Defining Site Significance. .......................................................................... 149 Table A1.4. Defining Vegetation Condition. ................................................................... 151 Table
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Native Orchid Society South Australia
    Journal of the Native Orchid Society of South Australia Inc PRINT POST APPROVED VOLUME 25 NO. 11 PP 54366200018 DECEMBER 2001 NATIVE ORCHID SOCIETY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA POST OFFICE BOX 565 UNLEY SOUTH AUSTRALIA 5061 The Native Orchid Society of South Australia promotes the conservation of orchids through the preservation of natural habitat and through cultivation. Except with the documented official representation from the Management Committee no person is authorised to represent the society on any matter. All native orchids are protected plants in the wild. Their collection without written Government permit is illegal. PRESIDENT: SECRETARY: Bill Dear Cathy Houston Telephone: 82962111 Telephone: 8356 7356 VICE-PRESIDENT David Pettifor Tel. 014095457 COMMITTEE David Hirst Thelma Bridle Bob Bates Malcolm Guy EDITOR: TREASURER Gerry Carne Iris Freeman 118 Hewitt Avenue Toorak Gardens SA 5061 Telephone/Fax 8332 7730 E-mail [email protected] LIFE MEMBERS Mr R. Hargreaves Mr G. Carne Mr L. Nesbitt Mr R. Bates Mr R. Robjohns Mr R Shooter Mr D. Wells Registrar of Judges: Reg Shooter Trading Table: Judy Penney Field Trips & Conservation: Thelma Bridle Tel. 83844174 Tuber Bank Coordinator: Malcolm Guy Tel. 82767350 New Members Coordinator David Pettifor Tel. 0416 095 095 PATRON: Mr T.R.N. Lothian The Native Orchid Society of South Australia Inc. while taking all due care, take no responsibility for the loss, destruction or damage to any plants whether at shows, meetings or exhibits. Views or opinions expressed by authors of articles within this Journal do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the Management. We condones the reprint of any articles if acknowledgement is given.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Orchid Society of South Australia
    NATIVE ORCHID SOCIETY of SOUTH AUSTRALIA NATIVE ORCHID SOCIETY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA JOURNAL Volume 6, No. 10, November, 1982 Registered by Australia Post Publication No. SBH 1344. Price 40c PATRON: Mr T.R.N. Lothian PRESIDENT: Mr J.T. Simmons SECRETARY: Mr E.R. Hargreaves 4 Gothic Avenue 1 Halmon Avenue STONYFELL S.A. 5066 EVERARD PARK SA 5035 Telephone 32 5070 Telephone 293 2471 297 3724 VICE-PRESIDENT: Mr G.J. Nieuwenhoven COMMITTFE: Mr R. Shooter Mr P. Barnes TREASURER: Mr R.T. Robjohns Mrs A. Howe Mr R. Markwick EDITOR: Mr G.J. Nieuwenhoven NEXT MEETING WHEN: Tuesday, 23rd November, 1982 at 8.00 p.m. WHERE St. Matthews Hail, Bridge Street, Kensington. SUBJECT: This is our final meeting for 1982 and will take the form of a Social Evening. We will be showing a few slides to start the evening. Each member is requested to bring a plate. Tea, coffee, etc. will be provided. Plant Display and Commentary as usual, and Christmas raffle. NEW MEMBERS Mr. L. Field Mr. R.N. Pederson Mr. D. Unsworth Mrs. P.A. Biddiss Would all members please return any outstanding library books at the next meeting. FIELD TRIP -- CHANGE OF DATE AND VENUE The Field Trip to Peters Creek scheduled for 27th November, 1982, and announced in the last Journal has been cancelled. The extended dry season has not been conducive to flowering of the rarer moisture- loving Microtis spp., which were to be the objective of the trip. 92 FIELD TRIP - CHANGE OF DATE AND VENUE (Continued) Instead, an alternative trip has been arranged for Saturday afternoon, 4th December, 1982, meeting in Mount Compass at 2.00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Protocols for Program Outcomes
    Monitoring and Reporting Framework: Technical Protocols for Program Outcomes Melbourne Strategic Assessment © The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2015 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. You are free to re-use the work under that licence, on the condition that you credit the State of Victoria as author. The licence does not apply to any images, photographs or branding, including the Victorian Coat of Arms, the Victorian Government logo and the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning logo. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en ISBN 978-1-74146-577-8 Accessibility If you would like to receive this publication in an alternative format, please telephone the DELWP Customer Service Centre on 136186, email [email protected] or via the National Relay Service on 133 677 www.relayservice.com.au. This document is also available on the internet at www.delwp.vic.gov.au Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Contents Introduction 5 Context and scope 5 Monitoring Program Outcomes 5 Reporting on Program Outcomes 8 The composition, structure and function of Natural
    [Show full text]
  • Chrysanthemoides Monilifera Ssp
    MANAGEMENT OF BONESEED (CHRYSANTHEMOIDES MONILIFERA SSP. MONILIFERA) (L.) T. NORL. USING FIRE, HERBICIDES AND OTHER TECHNIQUES IN AUSTRALIAN WOODLANDS Rachel L. Melland Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Agriculture, Food and Wine University of Adelaide August 2007 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................... II ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................ VI DECLARATION ................................................................................................................ VIII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................. IX CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 1 1.1 AIMS OF THIS THESIS .......................................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................... 5 2.1 PROCESSES OF NATIVE ECOSYSTEM DEGRADATION ............................................................ 5 2.2 GLOBAL PLANT INVASIONS – ECOSYSTEM DEGRADING PROCESSES .................................... 6 2.3 THE ENVIRONMENTAL WEED PROBLEM IN AUSTRALIA ..................................................... 10 2.4 CAUSES AND PROCESSES OF INVASIVENESS .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Salmon Gum Country (Eucalyptus Salmonophloia)
    This publication is designed to assist land Contents managers to identify the different vegetation and soil types that make up the Central and 2 Introduction Eastern Wheatbelt and enable them to best 3 Using This Guide decide the most suitable species when Find out how planning biodiverse revegetation. to prepare 4 Preparation and your site for Establishment Of Your Site regeneration 7 Revegetation Timeline 8 Red Morell Country 10 Gimlet Country 12 Salmon Gum Country Choose your soil type 14 Jam or York Gum Country 16 Tammar Country 18 White Gum Country 20 Mallee Country All flower, tree and landscape Introductory pages written Thanks to all Shire Natural 22 Sandplain or Wodjil photographs have been by Tracey Hobbs, Natural Resource Management kindly donated by Stephen Resource Management Officers in the Central Fry, Natural Resource Officer, Kellerberrin. and Eastern Wheatbelt for 24 Sandy Saline Systems Management Officer, Revegetation pages written edits and advice throughout Bruce Rock. by Stephen Fry, Natural the publishing process of Resource Management this book. Officer, Bruce Rock For further information This publication has been Publication designed Ken Hodgkiss & or assistance please contact funded by the Australian by Juliette Dujardin. friend, John Butcher, the Natural Resource Government’s Clean Energy Lawry Keeler & Management Officer Future Biodiversity Fund. Merrilyn Temby at your local Shire. 1 This publication has been written from a practical The Avon Catchment of WA has less than on-ground perspective for landholders to identify 10% of its original vegetation remaining. their own soil/vegetation types and the best species to use for their revegetation project.
    [Show full text]
  • Genomic Diversity Guides Conservation Strategies Among Rare Terrestrial Orchid Species When Taxonomy Remains Uncertain
    Annals of Botany Page 1 of 11 doi:10.1093/aob/mcx022, available online at https://academic.oup.com/aob Genomic diversity guides conservation strategies among rare terrestrial orchid species when taxonomy remains uncertain Collin W. Ahrens1,2,*, Megan A. Supple3, Nicola C. Aitken3, David J. Cantrill1, Justin O. Borevitz3 and Elizabeth A. James1 1Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria, Science Division, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia, 2Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia and 3Australian National University, Research School of Biology, Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia *For correspondence. E-mail [email protected] Received: 21 January 2017 Editorial decision: 30 January 2017 Accepted: 12 February 2017 Background and Aims Species are often used as the unit for conservation, but may not be suitable for species complexes where taxa are difficult to distinguish. Under such circumstances, it may be more appropriate to consider species groups or populations as evolutionarily significant units (ESUs). A population genomic approach was em- ployed to investigate the diversity within and among closely related species to create a more robust, lineage-specific conservation strategy for a nationally endangered terrestrial orchid and its relatives from south-eastern Australia. Methods Four putative species were sampled from a total of 16 populations in the Victorian Volcanic Plain (VVP) bioregion and one population of a sub-alpine outgroup in south-eastern Australia. Morphological measure- ments were taken in situ along with leaf material for genotyping by sequencing (GBS) and microsatellite analyses. Key Results Species could not be differentiated using morphological measurements.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Transport Corridors 9
    PaRt 3: assessment of tRansPoRt CoRRiDoRs 9. Regional Rail link (west of weRRibee to DeeR PaRk) The proposal for the Regional Rail Link – west of Werribee to Deer Park is being planned in an integrated manner with the changes to Melbourne’s Urban Growth Boundary, the Outer Metropolitan Ring / E6 Transport Corridor and the preservation of grasslands areas in Melbourne’s west. The Regional Rail Link can allow urban growth areas in Melbourne’s west to be served by high-quality public transport infrastructure early on in their development. It is of strategic importance to Victoria in achieving its wider transport planning vision as outlined in The Victorian Transport Plan and urban growth planning as outlined in Melbourne 2030 and Melbourne @ 5 million. 9.1 Understanding the Corridor The Regional Rail Link – west of Werribee to Deer Park is a 30 kilometre long section of up to 50 kilometres of the rail project linking the Melbourne-Geelong railway west of Werribee to Southern Cross Station via the Melbourne-Ballarat railway, connecting at Deer Park. The other section of the Regional Rail Link uses the existing rail corridors between Southern Cross Station and Deer Park. Both sections of the overall Regional Rail Link can be developed independently of each other, although both are proposed to be developed together to reduce construction times and ensure overall project benefits are realised as early as possible. 9.2 assessment The selection and assessment process to determine the alignment for the Regional Rail Link – west of Werribee to Deer Park involved: > Preparing route concepts to identify a broad range of options considering engineering constraints and benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Germination at Extreme Temperatures: Implications for Alpine Shrub Encroachment
    plants Communication Germination at Extreme Temperatures: Implications for Alpine Shrub Encroachment Susanna E. Venn 1,2,* , Rachael V. Gallagher 3 and Adrienne B. Nicotra 2 1 Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia 2 Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2600, Australia; [email protected] 3 Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Worldwide, shrub cover is increasing across alpine and tundra landscapes in response to warming ambient temperatures and declines in snowpack. With a changing climate, shrub encroachment may rely on recruitment from seed occurring outside of the optimum temperature range. We used a temperature gradient plate in order to determine the germination niche of 14 alpine shrub species. We then related the range in laboratory germination temperatures of each species to long-term average temperature conditions at: (1) the location of the seed accession site and (2) across each species geographic distribution. Seven of the species failed to germinate sufficiently to be included in the analyses. For the other species, the germination niche was broad, spanning a range in temperatures of up to 17 ◦C, despite very low germination rates in some species. Temperatures associated with the highest germination percentages were all above the range of temperatures present at each specific seed accession site. Optimum germination temperatures were consistently within or Citation: Venn, S.E.; Gallagher, R.V.; higher than the range of maximum temperatures modelled across the species’ geographic distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Enabling the Market: Incentives for Biodiversity in the Rangelands
    Enabling the Market: Incentives for Biodiversity in the Rangelands: Report to the Australian Government Department of the Environment and Water Resources by the Desert Knowledge Cooperative Research Centre Anita Smyth Anthea Coggan Famiza Yunus Russell Gorddard Stuart Whitten Jocelyn Davies Nic Gambold Jo Maloney Rodney Edwards Rob Brandle Mike Fleming John Read June 2007 Copyright and Disclaimers © Commonwealth of Australia 2007 Information contained in this publication may be copied or reproduced for study, research, information or educational purposes, subject to inclusion of an acknowledgment of the source. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for the Environment and Water Resources. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Australian Government does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. Contributing author information Anita Smyth: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Anthea Coggan: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Famiza Yunus: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Russell Gorddard: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Stuart Whitten: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Jocelyn Davies: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Nic Gambold: Central Land Council Jo Maloney Rodney Edwards: Ngaanyatjarra Council Rob Brandle: South Austalia Department for Environment and Heritage Mike Fleming: South Australia Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation John Read: BHP Billiton Desert Knowledge CRC Report Number 18 Information contained in this publication may be copied or reproduced for study, research, information or educational purposes, subject to inclusion of an acknowledgement of the source.
    [Show full text]
  • Origin and Age of Australian Chenopodiaceae
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 5 (2005) 59–80 www.elsevier.de/ode Origin and age of Australian Chenopodiaceae Gudrun Kadereita,Ã, DietrichGotzek b, Surrey Jacobsc, Helmut Freitagd aInstitut fu¨r Spezielle Botanik und Botanischer Garten, Johannes Gutenberg-Universita¨t Mainz, D-55099 Mainz, Germany bDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA cRoyal Botanic Gardens, Sydney, Australia dArbeitsgruppe Systematik und Morphologie der Pflanzen, Universita¨t Kassel, D-34109 Kassel, Germany Received 20 May 2004; accepted 31 July 2004 Abstract We studied the age, origins, and possible routes of colonization of the Australian Chenopodiaceae. Using a previously published rbcL phylogeny of the Amaranthaceae–Chenopodiaceae alliance (Kadereit et al. 2003) and new ITS phylogenies of the Camphorosmeae and Salicornieae, we conclude that Australia has been reached in at least nine independent colonization events: four in the Chenopodioideae, two in the Salicornieae, and one each in the Camphorosmeae, Suaedeae, and Salsoleae. Where feasible, we used molecular clock estimates to date the ages of the respective lineages. The two oldest lineages both belong to the Chenopodioideae (Scleroblitum and Chenopodium sect. Orthosporum/Dysphania) and date to 42.2–26.0 and 16.1–9.9 Mya, respectively. Most lineages (Australian Camphorosmeae, the Halosarcia lineage in the Salicornieae, Sarcocornia, Chenopodium subg. Chenopodium/Rhagodia, and Atriplex) arrived in Australia during the late Miocene to Pliocene when aridification and increasing salinity changed the landscape of many parts of the continent. The Australian Camphorosmeae and Salicornieae diversified rapidly after their arrival. The molecular-clock results clearly reject the hypothesis of an autochthonous stock of Chenopodiaceae dating back to Gondwanan times.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER?
    Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology ISSN: 1409-3871 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica BACKHOUSE, GARY N. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology, vol. 7, núm. 1-2, marzo, 2007, pp. 28- 43 Universidad de Costa Rica Cartago, Costa Rica Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44339813005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative LANKESTERIANA 7(1-2): 28-43. 2007. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA GARY N. BACKHOUSE Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Division, Department of Sustainability and Environment 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002 Australia [email protected] KEY WORDS:threatened orchids Australia conservation status Introduction Many orchid species are included in this list. This paper examines the listing process for threatened Australia has about 1700 species of orchids, com- orchids in Australia, compares regional and national prising about 1300 named species in about 190 gen- lists of threatened orchids, and provides recommen- era, plus at least 400 undescribed species (Jones dations for improving the process of listing regionally 2006, pers. comm.). About 1400 species (82%) are and nationally threatened orchids. geophytes, almost all deciduous, seasonal species, while 300 species (18%) are evergreen epiphytes Methods and/or lithophytes. At least 95% of this orchid flora is endemic to Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Survey Guidelines for Australia's Threatened Orchids
    SURVEY GUIDELINES FOR AUSTRALIA’S THREATENED ORCHIDS GUIDELINES FOR DETECTING ORCHIDS LISTED AS ‘THREATENED’ UNDER THE ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AND BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ACT 1999 0 Authorship and acknowledgements A number of experts have shared their knowledge and experience for the purpose of preparing these guidelines, including Allanna Chant (Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife), Allison Woolley (Tasmanian Department of Primary Industry, Parks, Water and Environment), Andrew Brown (Western Australian Department of Environment and Conservation), Annabel Wheeler (Australian Biological Resources Study, Australian Department of the Environment), Anne Harris (Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife), David T. Liddle (Northern Territory Department of Land Resource Management, and Top End Native Plant Society), Doug Bickerton (South Australian Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources), John Briggs (New South Wales Office of Environment and Heritage), Luke Johnston (Australian Capital Territory Environment and Sustainable Development Directorate), Sophie Petit (School of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia), Melanie Smith (Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife), Oisín Sweeney (South Australian Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources), Richard Schahinger (Tasmanian Department of Primary Industry, Parks, Water and Environment). Disclaimer The views and opinions contained in this document are not necessarily those of the Australian Government. The contents of this document have been compiled using a range of source materials and while reasonable care has been taken in its compilation, the Australian Government does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this document and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of or reliance on the contents of the document.
    [Show full text]