Uncovering a Shift in Russian

CEU eTD Collection R USSIAN USSIAN M APPING In requirements for fulfillmentof the MastersArts thedegree partial of of F OREIGN OREIGN Department of InternationalDepartment and Relations European of Stud C HANGES IN HANGES P OLICY BETWEEN THE BETWEEN OLICY AND Supervisor: Central European University Word count: 14,95 Word D U Budapest, Hungary Jacqueline Dufalla ISCOURSE KRAINIAN KRAINIAN Submitted to Submitted Alexander Astrov 2015 By

U 3

RISIS

NCOVERING A NCOVERING

USSO

- G EORGIAN EORGIAN ies

S HIFT IN

W AR AR CEU eTD Collection the moment,Russian the midst complexitypatterns inthecurrent andin discourse, different foreign policy Russian isstill andRussia some other cou previ change for implications hasforeign Russian indiscourse serious policy. has appeared.In nowperceivesaddition, Russia theinternational as order This broken. oforder international disc andemphasized wereand law officials,Russian pattern discourse. adifferent in2008,the emergeslegitimacy While inthe experiencinga However, surgeanalyzing innationalism. bygiven by speeches top or continuation of theRusso two events. someforeign scholars Russian While current tendtoseeas anescalation policy exp thesis aimsto Throughcomparing Russo the 2008 ous common international framework, which will makeous commoninternationalframework,will between futurewhich interactions of a change. lore whether f ornot ashiftinRussian foreign The The ntries form -

Georgianresponding as War, or toNATO policy is

, such as theUS, and outcomes - Georgian and 2013 War neither neither A BSTRACT entirely i

of this new discourse remain tobeseen, new discourseof butat remain this

more difficult.

clear nor oreign policy occurredbetween the ussed, byextra 2014, - present Ukrainian C present Ukrainian

unified. Moreover, notedbyMoreover, the

, others see as, others it

It the eliminates - legal rhetoric risis, this this risis, - level level CEU eTD Collection finally fullyappreciated T not onlya loveof instilled knowledge continue and tosupport foste inme butalso both keep engaged mefocused and with Iwould li o my sisters: ke toexpress

Michele,

deep gratitudedeepand appreciati . who

always listened A CKNOWLEDGEMENTS

my topic.my , and ii

Nicole

Iwould alsotothankmy like parents, who on toAlexander Astrov, who , whose years, whose ofwork hard

managed to r tha are t love.

CEU eTD Collection Bibliography of 1:List SpeechesAppendix Conclusion Rhetoric Chapter 3:The 2013 International OrderLaw and Chapter 2:The Russo Chapterbetween Discourse Foreign 1:The Relationship Policy and I ntroduction 1.2 Foreign Discourseand Policy Connection toForeign its Policy 1.1 DiscourseForeign Policy and Discourse:Defining theTerms 3.3 Victory Dayand in2014 2015:Competing Speeches Patterns Rhetoric International3.2 The Perceivedthe End of and theAppearance an Order, of 3.1 Before The C November 2013: Legitimacy2.3 After Continued AugustInternational The 2008: ofthe Order and Order 2.2 RhetoricInternational Surrounding ActionLaw the Conflict: Justified inaccord with Georgian War 2.1 2007 3.2.2 Lavrov’s3.2.2 February2015 Munich Speech:International EndofOrder the The 3.2.1 The of Annexation Crimea inMarch AppearanceaRhetoric New 2014:The of 2.1.2 After theRecognition theMunich and ofKosovo Conference: OnNATO International Order Conference:2.1.1 The 2007Munich Openly Displaying Understanding Russia’s ofthe

......

...... -

2008 Rhetoric: Russia’s Perception of the International2008 Rhetoric: Perception Russia’s before of Order the theRusso ......

......

...... -

- Present the Appearance Crisis Extra and Ukrainian of

Georgian Rhetoric: War in and Belief Desireand The for ......

......

...... T ...... ABLE OF ...... ontinued Legitimacyontinued InternationalLaw of and Order ...... iii C

ONTENTS ......

......

...... Extra

...... - legal

- ...... legal

......

.. .. -

18 16 15 15 10 50 45 42 39 36 30 29 28 28 25 21 .

8 8 1

CEU eTD Collection georgia News 3 21 the in 2 1 involvement Russia’s tends todemonstrate that border, Russiahaving began militaryexercises lining and uptroopsnearby. the annexation of Crimea. from assistance,with Russian Georgia as in2008pa actual republics. Abkhazia evenand Ossetia,the Some South tworepublicsbroke see away that in part and concern Russian supportfor tookplace breakaway regions informerSoviet 2008 Russo andRussia other countries. foreign policy c The magnitudewhat are Russian consequences ofthein ofa supposedchange? the shift indicates an paradigmatic ideologicalthere Finally,alternative or explanation? shift,oran is Second, iftherechange isa inRussian policya Russo result as of the 2008 interrelated regardingforeign questions policy. Russian Tothisareoccurred, th end,this and theimplications? ifso,what large surge innationalism Russo foreign policy of Russia’s The annexation of Cr

Nick Logan, “Will Crimea b Crimea “WillLogan, Nick Georgia “Russiaand Nygren, Bertil wi Russia and Federation Russian simplicity,the the sakeof For , 28 February 2014, accessed 5 May 2015, May2015, accessed 5 February 2014, 28 , - - Georgian War, war st Scholars and alike journalists were eagercrisis tocompare the with theUkrainian

Century, - russia 1 -

Georgian War, and onthesurface indeed, similari several foreign perceptibly. relations Headlines havethe impression thatRussia’s left reflected - ould have serious ramifications for future seriousould have between for ramifications internationalrelations

stakes ed. Roger Kanet (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011), 110. 2011), Macmillan, Palgrave Kanet(London: ed.Roger imea -

higher a

an escalationcontinuationan of theforeign or policy during the2008 react e a repeat of Georgia War? Probably not, but Russia’s stakes are higher,” are stakes but Russia’s not, Probably War? Georgia of repeat a e

. Naturally arise: questions inforeign hasa twomain policy shift 2

in 2014andongoingUkrainian

- Even before war broke out on the South Ossetia out ontheEven South before broke war ukraine

ion

–

against the North Atlan theNorth against From Confrontation to War: What is Next?” in isNext?” What War: to Confrontation From - euromaidan/ - Georgian and 2013 War I NTRODUCTION foreign policy,a nationalism merelythat surge isit in http://globalnews.ca/news/1177664/will

in Ukraine is simply another stepin Ukraine toRussia’s issimply another ll be used interchangeably in thesis. this interchangeably used ll be

First, tic Treaty or simply Organization, C rts of Russia, which then mimics thenmimics rts of which Russia, risis have impacted the landscape - current Ukrainian Crisis? current Ukrainian

has ashift o

esis aims to examine three

ties appear.Both crises Russian Foreign Policy Policy Foreign Russian - ccurred in crimea 3 –

The comparison

Georgian - be - repeat

foreign Global Global

- of

a - CEU eTD Collection 9 138 2011), Macmillan, (London: Palgrave 8 7 http://mearsheimer.uchicago.edu/pdfs/Ukraine%20Article%20in%20Foreign%20Affairs.pdf Affairs, Foreign 6 http://eng.globalaffairs.ru/number/The 5 319832 May2015, 4 accessed 4 Ukraine also“thinly NATO. veiled tojoin received threats”ifitdecided the Russo Mette Skak goalabandoned its thealliance”. ofbringingUkraine Georgiainto and NATO expansion.He clear “Yet concludes: never publicly warning, despiteNATO this In Inmembership. a well policy.glosses over the Moreover,important it events. differences between thetwo comparison andeffect Crisis its uniqueness Russian eclipses the oftheUkrainian on clearlyescalating as seen an of series attempt toprotect some authorsgofar even thattheRusso as so toclaim war with Ukraineall aworking represent outofth incorporation of theGeorgian territo Newsweek continuedgreat imperial power ambitions.appeared orFor inanarticle instance, that in

Ibid, 138. Ibid, New “Russia’s Skak, Mette 3. Ibid, Putin,” Provoked that Delusion Liberal The Fault: West’s is the Crisis Ukraine “Why the Mearshimer, John Boundaries,” World Russian “The Zevelev, Igor “ StephenBlank,

this case, Mearshimer views theRusso case, Mearshimerthis

Georgiancrystal also war clear. made effort turnthosecountriesagainst to Russia consider Georgia into any expansion NATO unacceptable, andalong with Ukraine leadersRussian have tol Other Mearshimer,the twoevents’ scholars, asNATO to John discussrelation such

- , the author claimed: “ claimed: , theauthor Georgianwas War thewillingnessGeorgia NATO. tojoin of , shares opinion. Mearshimer’s

September/October 20 September/October Putin’s Ukraine War is About Founding a New Russian Empire,” Empire,” Russian New a Founding is About War Ukraine Putin’s its citizensits withthe anduseof compatriotsforce abroad http://www.newsweek.com/putins - known article, argues:known Mearshimer

Monroe Doctrine,” in Doctrine,” Monroe

d theirmany Western on counterparts they occasionsthat - The K Russian 14, accessed 12 January 2015, January12 2015, accessed 14,

ries of Abkhazia and Ossetiainto South andries Russia, the ofAbkhazia actions remlin’s 2008warremlin’s with Georgia,… - World - Russia in Global A Global in Russia Georgian as War awarningagainst shot continued S Russian Foreign Policy in the 21 in Policy Foreign Russian h

6 - reflectinggrowingaggression. Yet Russia’s the e c Boundaries

ukraine la is logic ofwar”. imperialism and im — s a messagethatthe2008Russian

- - one ofthe war Georgian“ was War - 16707 ffairs, -

about

7 June 2014, accessed 4 May 2015, May2015, accessed 4 June2014, 7 - founding

b ig ge Newsweek 7 s st

t reasonsthat caused - 8 Another scholAnother Century new 9

Skak mentionshow I …” n anothern article its coerciveits Russia’s firstRussia’s - russian , 6. , 5

, ed. Roger KanetRoger ed. , , 6 April 2015, April 2015, 6 , The are events

- 4 empire

Indeed, foreign - ar, - CEU eTD Collection 13 policy/500352.html May2015, 12 11 the April 2014 10 absencecommon understanding. a Problems ar of international conducted. relations Hall are Michael writes C. feared onhowHobbes the driving force foreign inRussian policy, occ foreign policytonationalism, as succumbing overarchingforeign rationalefor policy decisions “ during theRusso to claim thatthere foreign isa“paradigmatic shift” inRussian asgrowing aforce theRussianFederation, in thatunleashed goingas even nationalism sofar important therefore, for and Russia, a event. different Ukraine,have citeactions thefact taken. been also ismor nosuch Many that Ukraine givingnote isthat Georgiawar, first, justificationtogo attacked while the Russia to in Georgianand theUkrainian War Crisis. with Ukraine.time such For scholars,result ofNATO the Russo the was expansion both present once Russia 2008 andaggressively, in withexpansion, acted continuing again this against NATO,incurring andhostility. its thus, focuses and asignoring bothevents protestations primarily he views Russia’s onNATO, entitled, “ Putin appearsPutin toembrace decided tohave ethno

Ibid. Policy,” Foreign Russia’s inShift Rutland, “A Paradigm Peter Ibid. in Crisis Ukraine,” thefor Lessons in War Georgia: 2008 “The OlegShakirov, - crisis urred

The ramifications ofmisinterpretingchange a affect way inforeigncan policy the Not all s - in . Following the Ukrainian. Following the , accessed 18 May 18 2015, accessed , http://www The 2008 War in Georgia: Lessonsin Georgia:The Ukraine the 2008 War in Crisis for - ukraine/ cholars comparingTypical believe thetwoevents. in scholars differences that

Georgian War. Georgian .themoscowtimes.com/opinion/article/a

http://globalinterests.org/2014/04/24/the 12

Forarticle an instance, in C risis, he also claims nationalherisis, interests also are the nolonger which would havewhich serious would consequences.

eclipsing any other 3 10

Due toN ” nationalism andnotstate interestsnationalism as the ise as: . 13 - paradigm

11 The author frames broadlyRussian The Moscow Times Moscow The

They seeUkrainian instead the Crisis

ATO ignoring the warningATO ignoring the signs - The shift policy that did not occur not policy thatdid - 2008

changes thatmay have Moscow Times in - russia Center on Global Interests Global on Center - war ,” the author,” similarly the , 18 May 2014, accessed 5 5 accessed 2014, May 18 , - - in s - - foreign georgia

claims: - -

lessons e - - for , 24 24 , - CEU eTD Collection discu in (mostly itself as anobject discourse notion of underthe other 17 16 15 218. (Spring 1996): 2 14 creating foreignpolicy. foreign policy hasare as Topofficials occurred. themain,albeit sole, actors not seen in specifically, foreigncoming from speechesand presidents m cooperation. interpreting Thus,correctly importance. foreignpolicy ofthe remains upmost be thatwouldnodoubt a serious division leave ideological room little correct, wouldindicate then it a there opposite tothe shift one Morgenthaudescribed; would e foreign policy allowed twocountriesbetterIf, these tofoster internationalfor cooperation. wide victory the ofone other”. or confrontation bet he longer stated,as governmentsconceived “relationsare a no by the concerned opportunity were for cooperative because more divisions action nolonger ideological. Union and U foreign unprecedented cooperation. policyfor allowed thattheSoviet of claimed levels He 1974, situationin similar whereUnited States’ arguedand thatchanges the he inSoviet countries and Russia, execution of theidea. Such conflict interpretationscanbetween in relations hinder other agreements internationalIndeed, in relations. a common sharedmean idea not the does From isclear it example, this that xample, scholarsxample, claiming foreignpolicy Russian is nowsolelydictated bynationalism are

In this thesis, the idea of psychological factors of leaders as a guiding factor of foreign policy is subsumed subsumed is policy offoreign factor guidinga as offactorsleaders ofpsychological idea the thesis, Inthis 53. Ibid, HansMorgenthau, reconsideration,” a relations: international and “Hobbes Hall, Michael C. To this end,isimportantTo this it analyze to thediscourseofRussian governmental actors, againstto bestsecure them. themselves agree threatswhat howtoreact thatpreservation, orhow compromised to on them, to Even if all wereon theright to agree self to

S agreeing on a agreeing policyS divided on Germany the then towards an indicated ween two incompatible philosophies… which incompatible philosophies… can inthe worldween two end only “The

escalatingalready Hans wrote Morgenthau tensions. ona brewing

New Diplomacy ofDiplomacyMovement,” New 17

The goal todiscoveroverarching is anand pattern any deviations

differences in interpretations exist even when even therearedifferences exist ininterpretations

In thelowered instance, this of ideology importance in 4 14

Encounter - preservation, all needpreservation, notnecessarily ssed by Michel Foucault and Louis and Foucault Michel by ssed , (August 1974) inisters toascertain a if in shift International Organization International

for international : 53.

15 50, No. No. 50,

As -

CEU eTD Collection defi Guardian 20 22. 1997), Routledge, 19 policy. foreign meaningsin setof underlying the provides It actions. to addition in policy foreign understanding 18 itself. in the discourse to as secondary is treated leaders ofthe individualism the officials, political fromranking high comes the discourse though even Thus, Althusser). ofspeeches. speeches follows. classification The narrative,researchgreat butduringthe a process, was there focus on specificspeeches acknowledgementare order in without toconvey theoverarching used come from Throughout theRussian Federation’sPutin. the president,Vladimir chapters, the officials, haveforeignministers, suchas made speeches them thesis, discussed inthis behindwould bemotives were the relevantshift the if focus. the internationalIn case, events. need thereisno this micro for through policy analyzing foreign rhetoric,and specifically rhetoricreferring surrounding to discourse is discoursePolitical analysis the research. were clear and patterns However, indicators still from the pattern. irregulariti While

Shaun Walker, “Western leaders’ snub casts shadow over Russia’s lavish Victory Day celebrations,” celebrations,” Day Victory lavish Russia’s over casts shadow snub leaders’ “Western ShaunWalker, Larsen, Henrik isacc defined term discourse’ ‘political The ant 1.

- victory the most important ofthethe most viewpoints government Russian onthe international Incommunity. paper, they this provid readwill the these speeches, officialsspeech. ofthe and thoughare innodoubt factsome Even foreigners can the all indomestic rhetoric.The Presid Together, theseshowaand international domestic, nationalistic, holidays perspective general,very much acknowledgement without any of internationalsituations. Unityn Day typically has important holiday and holiday inRussia as aninternational inRussia. These holidays were inparticular chosen asDaymost Victory isconsideredthe Day celebra bycitizens event.Day, natureofthe Unity National Victory the and Year’s Day, New Domestic speeches: In thereare thesis, threegeneral this ofspeeches. classifications a other few While , 15 April 2015, accessed 18 May 2015, May accessed 18 2015, April 2015, , 15 in constitutinggeneralframework the a for policy foreign line”. - day Discourse Analysis and Foreign Policy: France, Britain and and Britain France, Policy: Foreign and Analysis Discourse - parade

tions are examples ofdomestic speeches are examples astheytions are national holidays. - european

This category speeches specifically targetedinwardlytoward of is

is best suited foris bestsuited goal this because “the ofpolitical strength - kim ationalistic rhetoric, NewDay while Year’s are speeches - es are inthe thesis,theyes not emphasized did emerge during jong target audience ording to Henrik Larsen, who sees it as an independent factor in factor an independent seesit as who Larsen, Henrik to ording - un - http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/15/moscow 9 ent’s annual address can also be seen as adomesticent’salso addresscanas annual beseen - may e bothabaseline for as as show discourse well 5

- russia

is not primarily theinternational is not - ukraine - level or public dis public level or

prominent

Europe the differences between , (London, , York: New

and thefocus.and

19 20

course, which This is doneThis is

National ajority The The -

CEU eTD Collection 22 http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/text/speeches/2008/04/04/1949_type82915_163150.shtml Russia ofthe Meeting a Following Questions Journalists’ Answers to Statement and Press Kremlin, (The controversial”. and candid “ he stated, speech, Munich 21 dependent v independent theeffect concerning while order variables, onrhetoric isthe theinternational in English. independent From variableemerged. events the this, anddependent The are read inthe original if Russian to account validity for translations.English the Additionally,of the phrases occasional were comingthe most speeches. from domestic bewill referredas to that therea inrhetoric, legal wasdifference from speeches, ofAnnexation 2007MunichCrimeaI Speechand Speech,and the2014 the noticed primarily from domestic speeches 9May 2003 The paper framework this was preliminary of offresearchconducted by built of reading

A complete list of the speeches in their appropriate categories can be found in Appendix 1. 1. Appendix in found categories canbe appropriate intheir speeches the of Alist complete his2007 Regarding audience. target the on depending in rhetoric thedifferences to admitted has Putinhimself 3. 2. 1.

are commonality, typically tothis comparedpreviously due as mentioned. seen were internationally asstage reasserteditselfontheworld moments Russia a and the2013 Events: two countries. includetheYear Examples speech atUkraine in2003. inRussia the of arenot entirely domestic as neither nor they tobebetwe international, tend paper,this andRussia the relationship mainly Ukraine. speeches between These tosee Country appropr freelyabout views howit theinternational as,setting, ismore community inthis it Conferences. speechesat as conferences, international theMunichSecurity such issued present,the proceedingsreports on their engages, andhomeaudie to This includes speeches where given atforeign press conferences, media isoften International speeches: international activity speech, during it a domestic community. The takesgovernment toincorporate reason the beingtime isthatif ariable. iate.

- Two events are the main focus of this thesis: the 2008Russo Two events mainfocus thesis: the ofthis are specific speeches: - NATO Council, 4 April 2008, accessed 19 April 2015, April 2015, 19 accessed April 2008, 4 Council, NATO

- 21 present Ukrainian crisis. These events werepresent crisis. Ukrainian events chosenThese becausewere they extra

Thesegive speechesgovernment the more Russian liberty tospeak in Munich I was speaking at an international confer international an speakingwasat MunichI in

- legal.

the statements were ofthe statementsorphrased particular were significance oddly

These are speeches thattargetthe internationalcommunity.

Altogether, 72 speech

Therearea country few only 22

A few speeches were read in the original wereA fewspeeches read inthe Russian 6 -

9 MayIFirst,9 read 2015. two - based to another form, which in this paperbased inthis form, toanother which es were read from all threees wereall categories, read from

must bemust ofimportance. - specific speeches included in speeches specific

ence. That implies a certain certain a implies That ence. )

nces, and and nces, - Georgian War

international

en only nd style, style,

CEU eTD Collection change foreign policy inRussian theconsequences shift. has and occurred ofthis looking specifically at from rhetorical shifts legal focus will The onthe discourse official theevents, remainder of surrounding the thesis 2.

legal andextra level, of Kosovo.From suchas twotypes the recognition this, rhetoricemerged, of discussing inte internationalchanged. order Thiswascommon phrases measured when bythe used order:View ofinternational b. a.

rhetoric. rhetoric thestandard to international and order mentions constitutes extra Extra UN orSecurity Council. of precedentreferences totheinternational and under auspice order the the of particularly Charter.Nations’ legalrhetoric theUnited idea Other includes the Legal rhetoric: - legal: - rnational order, institutions, laws, rnational and actions institutions, order, made ontheinternational legal rhetoric. rhetoric. legal

Simply, iswhat it legal Rheto isnot. rhetoric

It references includes le tointernational often

Based on the events, I events, wanted ofBased ifthe the on thetosee view

to extra - legal in an attempt to showthatlegal to a an in attempt

ric outside oflegal gislation,

- legal CEU eTD Collection 27 26 25 24 23 Naturally,surface requires aformation distinctly. discursive to time discursive formation; and rather,itexpands covers several at once. planes temporal theory,andabstractions. other anthus, overarchingFoucault somewhat whichdetermines is pattern, similar toideology, ofinclusion thenew addition. discourse; remains discourseinclu butit the itself same, pattern occur whena new A discursive thenappears ofrules formation via used Changes thepattern indiscourse. inthe relevant of discourse.‘system thedefinition offor to A discourse thesis. used through the 1.1 changerhetoric policya inforeign indicates change policy. inforeign areforeign relationship defined,exploring and between discourse the policyrevealwill howa solidifyimportant to definitions ofd the changereflect can indiscourse foreign ashiftinstate’s First, itis however, policy. overarching themerelationship ofthe betweenforeign Specifically, and discourse policy. ifa C

Ibid, 74. Ibid, 74. Ibid, 38). (Ibid, words with those associated the heavyconnotations avoid to used formation’is ‘Discursive 74. Ibid, MichelFoucaul HAPTER

Discourse organized. made,a forand conceptbe such to such used, forandto such a strategy related,to be for and inaparticularpractice, discursive such such an enunciation a group that complex lays functionsrelations asit arule: be of downwhat must Foucault’s Beyond potentialchange of a thequestion inRuss

1: t,

T The Archaeology of Knowledge, of Archaeology The and and 23 HE The Archaeology ofKnowledge The Archaeology

R F oreign ELATIONSHIP

object, idea, strategy, 24

P Through process, canappear, regularities theformation and It import is olicy

His discussion ofHis discussion a ‘system isparticularly offormation’

D iscourse, rhetoric, and foreignpolicy. the After terms BETWEEN isc

ant notethat a to thereto anorigin isnot (New York: Pantheon Books, 1972), 73. 1972), Books, (New Pantheon York: ourse 8

or similar primarily provides theunderstanding of : Definingthe D ISCOURSEAND mation’ is: des new rules that follow the des newfollow rules that ian foreign policy lies the

meets thealready existing

27 T

Instead, discourses, erms F OREIGN

26 P be

OLICY

CEU eTD Collection 32 31 30 29 28 views offorum, discourse andaareadiscussion conflicting type aswhere an appear thoughts of discourse whic mode of alteringnot by reality, of e thedirect application reason, takena entirely candid “rhetoric asresponse. be rhetoriccannot Thus, honest or rhetorical discourse. purpose necessarily to isnot required; nor create isit action, persuade suchlectures or are not necessity. For certain response. LloydBitzer argues, when becomesathat rhetorical occurs discourse situation requiresa reason this. for strategy, et cetera. eclipse ofIt the pattern rules. previous indicatesnew merely theobject,a emergence of transientnew discourse. natureThe patterna rule emergence of of ignoredaway swepttheya Rather, if or pattern. indicate donotmatch discontinuities the withinadiscourseDiscontinuities forming are part thediscourse,and of they notbe should not consciously an goal to ultimate speaking expressinganmanifes overarching or himself may determined”. be idea, butit appearance Discourse of a one. an merely new ofgiven isnot expression a or fullyformed time. understood as particularhist “a

Ibid, 4. Ibid, 3. Ibid, 3. “Rhetorical,” Bizter, Foucaul Larsen, 28

At this point, rhetoric point, At this and discourse been have interchangeably, used and thereisa Exposing an irregularitydoes indicate not ortheof the aformation end discursive

t, “Archaeology,” 55. “Archaeology,” t, Discourse Analysis, Discourse is “a which thesubject totality, thedispersion of andhisdiscontinuity in with

instance, a theremay philosophical be orscientificgiven, butthe lecture Rhetoric isgeneral 30 h changes realityh through theme

In words, rhetoricalcomes does it simply discourse from not other appear; 31

Persuasion aparticularly is aspectrhetoric important of

16.

orical appear formation,”can ofdiscursive instance inless In thea discourse, subject,speaker/writer the short, or is of ly defined as the art definedasofly orpersuasion. the discourse 9

dia tion oftion thought andaction nergy by but toobjects, thecre

s does notnecessarilys does . For this ”. 32

Yet, as t.

Bitzer

is a ation CEU eTD Collection 37 Analysis 36 35 34 war. suchas a 33 writes onhowanalyzingdiscourse changes can show inthinkin typicallyrelationship abetweenDaniel thought andgeneral. Garst discourse in political discourse, between explored in theconnection be thetwomust 1.2 identity; changingflexible, discourse andexternal is the withinternal conditions. Thus, foreign policyisaset thatgover discourse ofrules Inforeign words, environment other policyproduce which makers the in they operate. given elementsactions, rather, setfield but constructed of orthat is isa by it policy makers. has theabilitya political believes effect. toproduce foreignis Gaskarth policy events,generally other policies, and countries, international Moreover, relations. discourse unders these within implied discoursespolitical astheyeffects”. may have theme,certain formIt a discoverthat are important to discourse. is “therules offormation adding foreignpolicy disc discourseFoucault’s and offof original builds discourses, foreign policy. ofanalysis He thesis, wereeither Rhetoric invited toa orrequired. refers specific ofdiscourse exploredinthis type speechesfrom officials. required and interact.Furthermore, Bitzer claims thatrhetorical oreven discourse isofteninvited

Ibid, 326. Ibid, Policy,” BritishForeign Constructionof Social The Ethics: and “Discourses JaimeGaskarth, ana only Foucault originally 8. “Rhetorical,” Bizter, event, an important to well response a as as rhetoric require events traditional or example,ceremonial For

Foreign tanding whichagovernment becomes rules clearerhow it they follows, perceive and theterms are therefore used interchangeably.

In toaffirma policy order thatinforeign indeed shift appears via Inregards Gaskarth, onBritish to foreignI toJamie policy whowrote discourse, turn 2, (2006): 327. (2006): 2, 33

, meaning, thesituation

P olicy

D 34 iscourse its and

lyzed three fields as examples: medicine, grammar, and economics. economics. and grammar, medicine, as examples: fields three lyzed

Speechesdiscourse; are classified thesis rhetorical they inthis as ourse. severalas Gaskarthelements, styleand statesthat such

calls forcertainresponse, aform typically of inthe C onnection toonnection 10

n and and illustratea actions state’s

F oreign oreign - g and perceptions. Hegand perceptions. depth. Tobegin there with, is

Or inother words, by P olicy a change in a change

not merelya Foreign Policy Policy Foreign

CEU eTD Collection 40 39 38 according toR to the traditional understandings betweenSelf. Hobbes, relationship and ofthe theState discourse, identity a state’s isformed. makers and onthe international states interact then thenatural level, Ifwhose identity? themediumthrough foreignpolicy weunderstand foreign as which policy Inconceptions.forbuilding, istheplayground short,discourse identityandbut shaping placenew a meanings;aflexible for mold is newtestpolicies it countriesidentityand to and practice”. we are producing its be explored.AsGaskarth concludes,an “inactivity orperforming linguistically, describing changes ashiftinthinking. reflect inrhetoric destroyedculture” “rhetorical its ability and tojustify actions its intelligibly. Theref indicates shift that this seeds ashas owndestruction, it Athenshasofits sowed the greater importanc before war,when stressed “energy,and Athens the nowplaces generosity,” it innovation, argues has rhetoric thatAthenian shiftedand asattitude its perceptionsthan changed. Rather also matters. One exampl prominent over time”. is articulated,and conventions andwhether the norms associatedwithit, notthey or decay Garst suggests, “Thucydidesconcerned languag is withthe illustrate how thereawork interpretation. toThucydides’andmaterial realist than is more specificallyspeeches analyzes the inThucydides’

Gaskarth, “Discourses,” 327. “Discourses,” Gaskarth, Ibid Neoreali and “Thucydides DanielGarst, ,

15. This is not thewhole not picture,This is alternative proposes however. Erik there isan Ringmar In indicatingaddition a to a rhetoric shift, alsoforum which provides in concepts can

In short,self 40 ingmar, theState considers as protecting chaos,orseeing from a the person

According toGaskarth,rhetoriccountry’s and a toexplore allows it create e on “wearye tobase andabdication onrealism necessity”.

meaning and so creating,meaning and orchanging so policy reinforcing, understanding

interest theway are but andactions they important, are discussed

sm,” e theMelian Garst is wherein Dialogue, provides Garst

International Studies Quarterly Studies International

The Peloponnesian WarThe Peloponnesian e through which this self ethis through which

33, (1989): (1989): 6. 33,

assumption is that from is assumption 39

in order to Garst concludesGarst

- ore, ore, interest and CEU eTD Collection 555. 2001): (September 46 45 44 43 42 446. (1996): 41 production of power. about and Self of Statepolitical identityrealization goals, orthe for the isessential the very of political foundation stabilitycivilization”. and actionunderstanding; required language common was thevehiclethi of narrative,Lebow writes regarding Richard Thucydides’ narrativesresultsIndeed inanidentity a crisis. change ontheimportanceunified orof moment”. alternatives; isa“formative hecalls it anthe and it “identity forstate, crisis”, for individuals, “potential,” and i find their He identities. gap always argueswill a there “actual” be between the and abouttold us”. subjects… neither norless is more than thetota these relation in concepts other areto subjects, understood concluding, “What we are as shown categorically solely oras abstract,toapiece similarly ofmusic. Ringmar provides satisfactory argues thatneither a as theS answer and doesa have not coherent also identity time, reflects which over theidentity State. of on composed”. “Leviathan who…broughttheindividual men ofwhichas peace asuperman he to was

Richard Ned Lebow, “Thucydides the Constructivist,” theConstructivist,” “Thucydides Lebow, Ned Richard 456. Ibid, 4 Ibid, 450. Ibid, 448. Ibid, State,” ofthe Status Ontological “Onthe ErikRingmar,

the other hand, as believed theidea theSelf impossible, Selfisever was ofthe 52. Byadheringa producing story,aSelf by to,orby story, recognizing and bothState 45

41 Thus, stories are told both by individuals andThus, stories arebothby told The individuals cl states.

Therefore, State gainsidentity therole its the from itplays Self.for Hume, the 44

n this void, narratives void, n this thatdetailcreated either arethecurrent identity or

12 l collection of tellandthat storiesthatl collection are we American Political Science Review Review Science Political American

European Journal of International Relations of International Journal European The Peloponnesian War Peloponnesian The 46

A unifiedaccepted and narrative

elfState cannot and be 43 s understanding and

Instead,argues, he ash between 95, No. 3 No.3 95, : “Common : “Common - changing , 2, no. 4 4 2, no. , 42

CEU eTD Collection 50 49 48 47 Indeed,createsfunctions. asserts: illustrateshow anidentity,thestate which soon he beingmaterialistica Ringmar shadow occurrences, of thatdiscourse more contests itself This means that rather actio than Inessence, identity ofpower. through also thenarrative its perception indicates the state’s Fortunately,meana for state’s power? ananswer exact Ringmar tothis question: provides narrative findtheiridentity, individuals gain the State and ability and that thus thetoact. derived butitself an power fromof expression social social power”. discourse identity constituting iscentral in a LarsenFoucault: referencingalso topower asserts, linked insociety “language isand meaningless, exercise the ability powerand to a can communityapart. very break As Henrik communication becomesdifficult, andcivilizati meaningfulthat without words, force, that “conventions depend their onthemlost throughLebowcannot tofollow expresses inorder bepower theview onambitions. similarly the Self, withoutWithout thenarrativeth ofthe Self, awithout rhetoricalculture: power. Garst,foreventually instance, describes self howAthens onlyfought for

Ringmar, “On the Ontologi “On the Ringmar, Larsen, 558. “Thucydides,” Lebow, 16. “Thucydides,” Garst, significanceweactions theyundertake. determine since which hencealso acert Our narrativesperspective support,orand undermine, will certain world a onthe however,What, isex community.without One cannot self be comprehensible there world be can it. ofreasoning noway within about oracting it Not onlyit ofsortunlimited, this isincoherent isambition and irrational; f disharmonyWith inthe narra Discourse Analysis Discourse

ain distribution ofpower.Butain distribution willalsohave stories political , 14. 14. , cal Status,” 454. Status,” cal

- interested withoutalanguage theinterested self; power of onecannot have 47

actly ofthe purpose and thenarrative and doesit identity, what

ns or events dictating discourse, or evenns orevents dictatingdiscourse, or merely discourse tives, there is not onlytives, isnot there a of ofidentity butloss loss

nd social beliefs… Discourse is not just an just entity not beliefs… Discoursend social is 13 on declines”.

ere becommunity, cannot and there 48

As words become

50 It through the is

- interest interest or a without

CEU eTD Collection 51 identity, andchanges mimic thus, policy. inforeign explored. Changes thestate shiftsin narrat policyindicate discourse inforeign of powerandtheinternational place its a and space order, where inisformed identity and policy. Thus,for other states, ofnarratives theinterplay intheform and ofpowerexists foreign exercise Inabsence acompeting rhetoric, arelations majoror of state discontinuity with isabletoact. power, even From national percepti interests. this be acceptedas absolute. concrete Narratives or the ofown state’s indicate its perception rhetoricaudience topersuade acannot bothaims anand it platform provides exploration, for the Self and of State, as self part Competingthat mayexist. competing identity, narratives aunderstanding indicate of bothof Discourse accounting competingcomes thus from inpartfor narratives, any discontinuities Rhetorical thatastate rules as discourse bothfollowsand aset create is understood of theseboth illustrates patterns of anddiscussion for identity.a is the space Overall, tohave ofidentity theharmony a isessential state theabilitytoact. for

Ringmar, “On the Ontological Status,” 455. Status,” Ontological “On the Ringmar, What thenWhat isthespecificrelationship between foreign policy and discourse? policy topursue. play howour ‘national inthe world; are tobedefined, interests’ which foreign or The narrativesc we eign policy specifically theofa identity isboth discourse state, perception its 51

onstruct aboutour statespecifyonstruct will are whowe and role what we

- identity comes from stateidentit comesidentity from

on and thesuccess ofthenarrative,ason inthe

y and vice

- versa. As ive and Discourse s. CEU eTD Collection http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01419870500465207 2015, May6, accessed belonging” collective of the and production sports, Holidays, nation: the “Consuming Fox, E. Jon See affairs. international cohesionthan national on more focuses which 54 April 2015, accessed 19 May 9 War, 2007, Patriotic 53 https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russia 52 to the intern ‘common responsibility equal national and holiday partnership’. referring As rhetoric directly Two keybecome phrases already apparent: dictate exclusive the and ‘an over world’ beginreadyexample comes a from with, 2007Victory Putin’s DayHe states: speech. threats theinternational order, to To andways these threats? were perceived tocombat there the UN, twoorganizations representing community? Wha theinternational sawRussia theinternationalIn orderparticular, beforehand. ofNATOand whatwasview its the Russo 2.1 unearth any or patterns irregularities inthe discourse. official Russo rhetoricbefore shortly the Thischapterperception order, effect? international w what ofand the ifso, followingthe USSR. the collapse of R Five“The King, Charles ussia’s way ofreassertinga ratherlengthy itself after from absencearena the world C Typically, national holidays are a chance for countries to produ to chancecountries for a are holidays national Typically, Kremlin, Speec The

HAPTER 2007 conflictsglobal andundermine security. challenges forcesenableto join and usany inresistingattempt conviction that onlyresponsibility common and partnership equal life toestablish andaspiration thesame These under theshow thesam new as ThirdReich, threats, just Before theRusso discussing For andalike, many scholars theRusso observers - 2008 Rhetoric:2008 Russia’s ational entirelyis not order typical, - Ge 2: orgian orgian War

T AND h at the Military Parade Celebrating the 62nd Anniversary of Vic Anniversary of 62nd Celebratingthe MilitaryParade hthe at HE - Day War,” War,” Day R B USSO

ELIEFIN

- Foreign Affairs Foreign G EORG - I 52 Georgian first importanthow War,to itis understand NTERNATIONAL

- Did sucheffect event a an significant have onRussia’s fsu/2008 P - erception ofthe IAN Georgian War, during, War, andGeorgian to afterwardinorder http://en.kremlin.ru/events , November/December 2008, accessed 8 May 2015, May 8 2015, accessed 2008, November/December , 15 W - 11 54 anIt exclusive dictate the over world. my is 53

these twophrases inparticular. chosen were 01/five R AND R Ethnic and Racial Studies Racial and Ethnic

ce a sense of national “collective belonging,” belonging,” “collective national sensea ofce O - day -

RDERAND Georgianappearedto be War R

- war HETOR I nternational nternational .

/president/transcripts/24238. IC s to unleash new armeds tounleash new L : e contempt fore human contempt

AW T tory in the Great tory

29, no. 2 (Aug 2 no. 29, can counterthesecan HE HE t were themain ill explore the explore ill O

D rder before before rder ESIREFOR ust 2006), ust 2006),

CEU eTD Collection dyn/content/article/2007/02/12/AR2007021200555_pf.html. 2 Accessed17, March 2007. February 10, Post, 56 55 ‘dialogue brings Putin between upunipolarity, nations,’ ascentre it “one defining of on theint poverty,economic and security a developing nations”. dialogue between to militaryandIt political stability. global ofthe thestability involves overcoming economy, providing of internatio a definition Indeed, perceivesRussia as and overlooked in notime unaddressed wastes issues. Putin In way, this taken seriously,aneventual could into leav develop crisis, understood theinternationalPutin that,place not order, issues if Russia’s anddangerous init, collapse of the Union. Soviet Russia’s newglobalorder. assertiveness ontheaftert To stage many,symbolized it what nowaclearlyaddress Russia’s is wheretheinternational famousheview of illustrated 2.1. desire for inclusivity. more foreignfeatures of 2007 Russianpolicyappear: discourseaglobal fear ofdictatorship and a threat that there for isa clear ancapable desire internationalorder dictatorial ofcountering this the Third Reich tobecome primarily asand world athreat aimed a it dictatorship, because governmentRussian perceived theIt international notetha order. important to is They trends pre twoimportant indicate

Vladimir Putin. "Putin's Prepared Remarks at 43rd Munich Conference on Security Policy." The Washington The Policy." Security on Conference Munich Remarks 43rd at Prepared "Putin's Putin. Vladimir Five “The King, 1

I The only through nternational Veryinternational defining soonafter included security, therequiring which caveat of At t ernationalare ofsecurity. level through seen theprism

2007 Munich 2007 Munich Conference: Openl he 43

it is more than Russia’s debut ismoreit than - DayWar”. rd

Munich Conference onSecurity delivered PolicyinFebruary 2007,Putin

cooperation and alread equality. Thus O rder

Yet, speech; therethis providesinsight it ismore how to into nal security sent before the Russo before sent 015. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp 015.

but a serious warninganbut aserious of illustration what and y 16

as comprisingthan issuesrelatingas more “much D

isplaying Russia’s isplaying

y speech, short two key inthis ing theinternational order inruins. - Georgian

U nderstanding of thenderstanding War 56 -

Most issues then Most

about howthe t Russia sawt Russia he CEU eTD Collection 60 59 58 57 primary violator of internationallaw, andbecause security, this,international claims and of and effectivefollowit.Heall parties immediately if USasbeingaccusesthen openlythe the and morality as what isunderstood action moral theinternational order disturbs a foundation, bytohave common it notallowing his understanding morality order international and shouldbe of howthe structured.Unipolar coming toone increasingly closer state’s legalsystem”. basic principles of internationallaw. And independent legal matter normsare,as offact, a resolvedandgreater continues: anygreater aand “Weare seeing disdain problems,” for the unipolarity frequently“Unilateral withillegitimacy, stating: and ac illegitimate possibility a ofhaving common against unipolar decision other they issues, but areonly ofsecurity. relevant thecontext in additionally He warns cooperation and ofsecurityencompasses sake foreconomics, politics is which the purposes, makesbeginningPutin several clear.Internat ofthe viewpoints speech, “there moral andmodern foundations can for civilisation”. no [are] be decisions.according The problem,of unipolarityconditions toPutin, where creates isthatit suggests want learn to themselves”. are cons decision one master, one sovereign”. authority,centre o one

Ibid. Ibid. Ibid. Remarks”. Prepared "Putin's Putin, Vladimir

From arise,Putin questions obvious ismorality this, ties such as, how defined? tantly being taught aboutdemocracy.for Butteach sometantly beingreason those taught who usdonot -

that democratic countriesthat democratic areguilty perhaps those most unipolar ofmaking making. makes He quipafterward, abrief then stating, “Incidentally f force,centre ofdecision one - makingas athreat against 58 57

It views unipolarityalreadyPutin clear that is and negatively

This confirms stated Russia’s desirefor more inclusive moral is legal. considered law Aninternational isonly legitimate

foundation.

- security rids it theworld because ofthe making. It whichmaking. thereworld in is a is 60

At this moment,heanswersAt this both

59 ional discussion and discussion ional

Thus, even at the -

Russia Russia tions havetions not – we -

CEU eTD Collection law. was international against declaration its that protests Russian despite 64 63 62 61 stated: would be. question about theofKosovoand, recognition occurred, ifit reaction would what the Russian beforemonths theRusso 2.1.2 of unipolarity. remains, a andremain, prominent will Thisthreat concern forPutin. international onlyconducted security be can conceptionapplication and ofnorms”. its necessary tomake thatinternational sure the lawin have a character universal both because from Russia isexcluded these organization stressesstatement, thattheEU Putin undoubtedly and are NATO notsubstitutes, partially the UN isthe nationsindeed, internationalforumparticipating. themost with afterthis And UN by theUN”. Putin withallmembersdiscussion representedequally. security”. time in states, point this Putin about “wethink the a seriously must considered legitimate, leadingIt collapse to instabilitysecurity. and of the at international is thus

On February 17, 2008, Kosovo 2008, On17, February Ibid. Ibid. Remarks”. Prepared “Putin's Putin, Vladimir 64 .

international order, is at risk. Ifinternational atrisk. order, thispattern international is cannot continues, law be It previous evident Putin’s rhetoric is based theo on whyis this

Due controversial nature, toits Russia After

states: “Theforce use ofcan consideredsanctioned legitimate beiftheis only decision give

On February 14,2008,threedaysKosovodec before moment,the UNAt this isseenglobalgoverning as theonlylegitimate institution. 61

insight into insight the Muni Thus, order but respectneed and isin theit exist, ofreform law for still a and 62

I nternational militarynternational force is ch Conference: the NATO Onand

Russia’s viewRussia’s onthe firstIn internationalorder. response, Putin -

Georgian War, Putin gaveGeorgian aconference. War, Putin press was He a asked direct

declared independence and was recognized by many states, including the US, the including manystates, by recognized was and independence declared

’s response to international recognition ofKosovo tointernational’s response recognition For legitimate Putin, sake for action the of

thus through the UN, as it will counter as will through theUN, it thehuge threat 18

onlylegitimate iflegally sanctified by the

s. He verifies “it bystating, is this R lared independence and six six lared independenceand ecognition of ecognition of Kosovo

rchitectureglobal of nly mechanism; viable

CEU eTD Collection withthe intenti ambitions 68 67 66 htt 65 byIran toward sayingthe actions framework thathis beUN will of “within Security the Nations andSecurity its Council”. creating st a new states, about inresponseglobal anewsecurity toa key question structure, “the role in that refersKosovo’s still Indeed action,of theUN Putin law. totheauthority and he international Security tooperateeffectivel Council internationalparticular. security Security depends in UN still and onthe ability the of and inthe press heprovides statement, important perceives insightshowRussia into and recognition its att by Putin countries, many moment,global despite thechallenges,respectable theisstill order and usable. owing decision tounilateral interests countries,’ he ‘particular andmentions butmorewarns actions importantly,he when we undermine will internat only outofpolitical expediency political interests and of servethe only decidingor wrongfactor toa ontheglobal “ later rightaction stage. states: Putin heavily oni decision Victoryhis 2007 He address Day andMunichspeech. again of‘unilateral’ theills stresses Althoughwords differenta using AnnualPress Big of Kremlin, Transcript The Specifically, the question addressed the issue of Iran’s nuclear program and how to stop its nuclear power power its nuclear howstop programto and nuclear Iran’s theof issue addressed the question Specifically, Statement. Kremlin, Press The Ibid. p://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/text/speeches/2008/02/14/1011_type82915_160266.shtml

Continuing the trend in AprilContinuing 2008,after thetrend declaration inbothKosovo’s of independence Serbia’s territorial integrity, respectall UNmust andmembers resolution. this international law. The 1244,whichspeaks Security Resolution has Council of issued and against the law. Terri thattosupport think We a unilateral of independence isamoral declaration by Kosovo - making, and how ‘ making, and how nternational law duringdirectlyeven hisresponse,as quotingnternational thefinal law legislation, ructure of international today’sructure in to the United relations belongs world on creating nuclear weapons. nuclear creating on

ional lawgeneral and order”. the

- all making, international or making, international

UN a members,’ few, He followthe not must rules. also relies torial integrity of fundamental isone ofthe principles nd phrases, the message is essentially the same asnd phrases, themessagewas isessentially thesame it in 67

When Putin is Putin When asked Iran, a questionabout ysole decisionas the and

Conference, 14 February 2008, accessed 19 April 2015, April19 2015, accessed February 2008, 14 Conference,

19 ends a meeting the Russia of

der could become 66

He atexclusivity hints of - maker. Thus, despite Thus, maker.

delegitimized. At this Atthis delegitimized. particular countries .

- NATO council, 68

If weact

he answers 65

CEU eTD Collection 71 70 69 to dialogue internationaland, inessence, thefunctioningH order. ofthe listened excluding to.He result unilateralism warns will inanend Russia that anddiscussions unaccommod then there for be can cooperation.arguesmay nobasis thatRussia He seen be as givesHe Russia islistened aformula:if to alsolisten simple very will to,it others, and ifnot, operate.states: he point At one Indeed, tha thereisoptimism the proposal continue thattalkswill wasbuthe accepted, not remainsoptimistic positively. defensemissile inEurope”. namely Russia system], UnitedStates, the ones, which“provide democratic equal, access t conference Hecountered says confirmsNATO thathewithmore initiatives inclusive this. members. remains ofunipolarity Thus, dislike his still strong,and hispress therest of making forarea decisions an heseesasencompassi that included inIn isnot Russia the discussions. general, heviewsas it aunilateral organization, about cooperation ontheinternational level currently, buthow the‘newstructure’indicates shouldlook.This isoptimistic that hestill which istheUNSecurity andnotthe international is the this believes order He Council. security, give a countryauthority waytothe higher should present i case,this thecase thatin he relationsinternational emphasizes thatjeopardize ofinternational Cou Ibid. Ibid. Ibid. Statement. Kremlin, Press The on one youwere know,todoeverythingas Butunilaterally, listening… respondTreat will accordingly. ButI andourpartners usproperly we today that thought ncil” and has that Russia Iran. already acted accordingly to withthe UN inregards

Putin, asMunich 2007 inhis Putin, speech,critiques inpartthat NATO duetothefact - side, that is a dead end. side, thatisadead ating, because butthat is always not correctly, itis although felt treated today he

t thecontinueto international will despite structure, failings, its

despite challenges. despite 20 o everyone in charge of [Russia’s proposedo everyone [Russia’s incharge of

ngactors only more than NATO

n the international order, n theinternational order,

to try to put allthe blame to try toput 70

owever, at point, this However, he states 69

In CEU eTD Collection http://mid.ru/brp_4.nsf/newsline/A59A69A0C7C68415C32574A500375421. May2015. 7 Accessed August 14 2008. "Russia"). weekly the in Ossetia,published Secretary withState (Interview “Rossiya”. v ezhenedelnike opublikovannoe Osetii, Yuzhnoi po Karasina B. G. Rossii del innostrannykh 74 73 war. in the involved wereheavily 72 important aspectsmost oftheconflict leverage Russia’s th was tonowengage directly itselfIt orrelated theconflict. oneconflict theparties ofthe in totheshowshow better able tocontinuea tohavewhat goodrelationship, more, is andtherelationship clearlyThis phrasing the will firstthatbe for theWest andRussia time. hethinks indicates an opportunity Russia and th for claimsconflict; truthcomesway, frominthis theRusso seems it distressing thattheWest doesnotagree actions. interesting withRussia’s is What isthathe perspective,which believes Russia change afterop will doesRussia go not defensive butinstead indicatesa onthe different that thehad West asked thewarabout the withtheHe effectofonrelations West. InAffairs, gave Ossetia. heSouth question, is Karasin, Grigory an aboutfirst interview the Munich speech. desire asgreat itself a toreestablish a2007 physical ofPutin’s or power, even manifestation 2.2 failingsobvious growing whichare and challenges, andexclusivity. unilateralism the international isnotbroken,retains order still andauthority, theUN although thereare

Minis 138. New,” “Russia’s Skak, the Russo 2008, August On 8,

I Rhetoric nternation On AugustRusso 2008,the 8,

than it was before. This is theveryThis is than itwas before.first Karasin opinion isnot which expresses, try of Foreign Affairs tryofForeign final settlementof inthe thesituation region should surroundingsituation Georgia… andthat originally different partners position of ourWestern athe had different view The iswellk truth, as it

be S 73 al al urrounding the

found Right after L awand

on whi

of the Russian Federation Russian the of - -

Georgian War began and lasted for five days. South Ossetia and Abkhazia also Abkhaziaalso and Ossetia South five for days. lasted began and War Georgian Deputy Minister ofF Minister Deputy

the end of the war on August the on the endofForeign war Deputy 14, of Minister

O ch we will be able to join forces we bewithWesterna partnersforch will able tojoin nown, is born in disputes. Andnown, isbornindisputes. rder e West to improvee see to their West relations, each toperhaps other C - Georgian War onflict: Action

oreign Affairs of Russia Grigory Karasin on South South on Karasin Grigory AffairsofRussia oreign result 21 , Interv’yu stats Interv’yu ,

. of

74 started, consideredRussia’s by many

such en see Henot discussions. as does it ustified inustified accord with

- open sekretarya sekretarya

there

responds:

, -

Georgia isviewedWar as joint

is –

nothing

zamestitelya Ministra Ministra zamestitelya discussions

e West in ae in West alarming in may even be

, an

option

CEU eTD Collection 76 75 from afterward stating, “ thatincludesdiscussion and Western Russia notjust count phrasing canifall thatthis sidesare implies be meaning, only accomplished a listened to, to the previous a speeches, resolutiontheUN in information order in toa tocome resolution. Clearly,response, as previous inhis final decision backgrou for themaintenanceand ofinternational peaces hasthat Russia decisions avoice made inthe in Council. ope important subtletythat he statement, inhis confirmsbelieves asit still theUN moreover, that the opportunity developin Security proposals are thatour Council by “ stating, also how shows viewRussia’s ofchanged theUN ifso,howitchanged.Furthermore, tothe war,and due he interviewer toseeasked UNorder.From ispossible if relateshow the it totheworld this, what decide theUN hethinks will anddiscussion decision onadiscussion more ground. even earliermore Putin’s for inclusive Thisreflects wishes

Ibid. Affairs ofForeign Ministry

westerncountries

Karasin continues: “ Later thea effectiveness on, askedKarasin directly questionabout is UN, and ofthe nd of the August events in August nd of the gevents”. Ito convinceable soonwe thatvery intheUN beourcolleagues will hope - maker, and he and work hopesmaker, will togettheappropriate thatthe UN background

Russia nowviewsRussia toglobal the UN firstresponds inregards Karasin order. I must admitI that ourdiplomatic efforts and must representatives contacts with 75

Thus, Karasin and theideathatcooperation expresses possible, is

- over theandover past days, making.

of the Russian Federation Russian the of The UN the mainorganThe Security resolution, Council responsible

still exists still

concerning actions Russia’s Georgia. in Specifically, the the conflict zone”.

well

to convince an theUNThisis Council. Security - founded andfounded motivated by 22 , I our reasonedour oncurrent position events ecurity, a also should include

nterv’yu stats nterv’yu must

take noteof His all theinformation. 76

Thus, Karasin theUN as views the

ries. He verifies this by this He rightries. verifies - sekretarya

the logic of

clear, overall

and similar rates, and CEU eTD Collection http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/text/speeches/2 79 78 77 Meaning, violated because internationalGeorgia Georgia is wrong. law, and synonymousas heuses actions. law withreason international tochastise Georgian thatMedvedevthis toconsider internation continues thecurrent of reason,an armedconflict unleashed the UN and Charter obligations agreements their underand international contrary tothe voice First, atthevery “ beginningsays, ofhisspeech, he Inafterrecognition the ofKosovo. regard, Medvedev this makes statements. twosignificant Karasin’s which statement, time had passedlittle after the war. statement Medvedev’s inone ofthe fills gaps left by awhy point, Atthis as recognizeAbkhazia and independentstates. will Russia Ossetia South roleasessence its UN aglobal and tocontinuemaintain forum. mediator forthe inorder to beaddressed, and said,these asisofthe thattime he are issues, ‘pressing’ meaning has changed. not However, asalso stated before, Putin therear totheattitude worldwar,Thus, theUNtoward this and isessential order,Russia’sit despite had discu heard by theWest. was operatingRusso during the eventually

The Kremlin, The Ibid. stats Interv’yuAffairs, ofForeign Russia,Ministry

Later intheonAugust Medvede month 26, reform and Security its theorganization both Council. issues ofworld However,recent order. eve continues toconsider one it of ofthepressing discussion themost key for platforms regardWith theUNrole aswhole, has of tothe Russia considered aalwaysand viewAs tohis of order,what theworld Karasininterview Putin inline endsthe with ssed at length in his Munichstates: hisspeech. ssed at lengthHe in led tousbeing heard”. Statement by President of Russia Dmitry Medvedev RussiaDmitry of President by Statement

is whether or not Russia still respects still notRussia is whether law, especially international or

- Georgian afterward War and specifically because Russia was 77

It is 008/08/26/1543_type82912_205752.shtml

victimizing innocentvictimizing civilians”. therefore obvious thatKarasintherefore thattheUN obvious thinks - sekretarya 23

nts have confirmed the pressing need confirmed pressingnts have to the v released an v released statement official explaining The Georgian leadership, in violation of The inviolation Georgian leadership, .

, 26 August 2008, Accessed 7 May 2015, May Accessed 7 2015, 2008, August 26 , 78 e issues with theUN thate need issues with

al important, order legitimate,

It easy is from totell

CEU eTD Collection 81 80 present Munich speech Putin’s in “ thatrequires inastatement interpretation, little during anotherinterview and and Abkhaz citizens, because thisdemocratic process, of berespected. must it Even action thatthis wasEurope. Ossetian also through South Hefree emphasizes ofthe will the legislation the UN andinboth rules Thus, Medvedevexplains actions Russia’s recognize Ossetiaand South Abkhazia as independentstates.He explains: wants bring to these to issues light sothe severeLike aggressive. Karasin,though Munich speech, andPutin’s or Medvedev as seems it frustrationbut proposals thatRussian werewordingat his ignored allinstitutions, isnot system; wanted withother countrie hediscussion a still perceived international toworktheestablished as within continued aviolationof law, he how He dissatisfactionexpress his withthe institutions. does soby In does aggressively statement, not this Medvedev NATO andUN,criticize buthedoes the onthemattereffectopinion its and law and oninternational clear. order

Ibid. Kremlin, The even though

independence. on therecognition Federation Russian the by ofOssetia'sand South Abkhazia's Finaland Act other of1975 fundamentalinternatio InternationalLaw Governing Friendly RelationsBetween Helsinki States, theCSCE guided ofthe Declaration UN by the theprovisions Charter, onthePrinciplesof 1970 Consideringexpressed will thefreelyof Medvedev government Russian decided speech by his justifying has to closes why the andat even the UnitedNations. independence of ourseven position this after the of unilateral proclamation Kosovo's repeatedlyWe returningcalled tothe negotiating for fromand deviate didnot table Furthermore,touched which onthetopicof Medvedevthus Kosovo, Statement by President by Statement

the recognitionthe thegovernment ofKosovooccurred,Russian what … Regrettably, [our proposals… Regrettably, [our 81

five very that were days closely later,sentiments mimics Medvedev

and the Commission onSecurityand theCommission Cooperationand in 80

yaddressed be can they before increase inseverity. through theframework law through of international 24

Ossetian and Abkhaz peoples and being andand AbkhazOssetian peoples to Georgia s. He his also then expresses nal instruments, Inal instruments, Decrees signed first mentioning Kosovo,and ] were ignored also by were also ignored NATO ]

makes his makes Russia Russia , citing

CEU eTD Collection http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/speeches/2009/11/12/1321_type70029type82 April 2015, 25 accessed 83 http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/text/ May 7 2015, accessed 2008, August 82 wean had effectiveinstitution that would such and Karasin,Putin “ Medvedevremarksabout NATO: Moreover, UN the isstrengthening, despite maysituation even opportunity sothatthe formore and open better between discussion theWest andRussia This reflects byKarasin, statement thesimilar asinp November gaveannual 2009,Medvedev address. the presidential stated: He government continuedto years notthe case. is yearthis a Evenafterand two Munich speech, later, Putin’s theRussian changed theand internationalorder towards law. thelegitimacy However, ofinternational on theRusso 2.3 Georgian has War, very little changed respect. in this international effect. order in isstill Despite therecognition Russo ofKosovoand the afterward, policy Russian foreign that demonstrates international lawgeneral and the arg recognises of the international fundamental principles theprimacy of law

The Kremlin, The Kremlin, The ue against a unipolar world. aue unipolar against

After That tosay, not is however,thesystem thatAgain, Medvedevsuggests perfect. is like And we position. actively will tostrengthen encourage it its the so yearscollectiveIn approach. recent haveWe theuniversal mechanismNations a help ofthe to develop us United Itaftera maylogical period seem that of wherein more time could Russia fully reflect

August 2008: The - - Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation ofthe Russian Assembly the Federal to Address Presidential Rossia,NTV One, Channel Channels Television to Medvedev by Dmitry given Interview Georgian andWar recognition called Cold War, the United Nations has once again started to gaincalled UnitedNationsmomentum. the War, hasstarted again once Cold to improve.

have rhetoric similar regardingandIn eventsinternational the order. speeches/2008/08/31/1850_type82912type82916_206003.shtml

Medvedev thinks thisMedvedev thinks scenariothroughUN. occur willonly the

82 C

Therefore, duringat point this shortly and thewar ontinued

and perhaps for theendand since perhapsverytime of for first the war andwar Kosovocontroversy.the

of Kosovo, its opinion andattitudeof opinion Kosovo, its may have L 25

egitimacy ofthe egitimacy haveable been tohalt an aggressor, then

erhaps the Russo

We need a new, efficient platform. If needWe platform. efficient a new, 912_222702.shtml

I 83 nternational

- Georgia War wasGeorgia War an ,” and continues to ,” , 12 November 2009, 2009, November 12 ,

O rder - , 31 31 ,

CEU eTD Collection differenc The similar. threat as the he perceives isclear community,it a and cooperation international for need suchas the 86 http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/text/speeches/2009/05/09/1613_type127 April 2015, Accessed 25 2009, 85 84 action. importance security, ontheinternational community, and and shared discussion cooperative even afterthe Russo with the international communitythreats. potential, tocombat violent inorder holiday. importantly, More callechoesgreater however,Putin’s for Medvedev cooperation MedvedevThus, like Putin, remarkson international confirming issues, byemphasizing this theimportance ofinternational security. speech.By the speaking ‘planet’,already of Medvedev isreferring indicating he to although reflects different thesame style, in sentiment dueDespite tothe Russo thechanges in2008 VictoryDay delivered speech,He now bystates: Medvedev. new institution. thinki conflicts at behandled should the international andinline withthe current level way of international appears duetoNATO. it conflict At point, resolution this supportssuch he still UN isimprovingforum and of the seems rhetoric.Medvedev,the behis thinks contradiction is aforementioned, to a slight as Georgiahad thenerve tost would have not ofVictory Anniversary of64th in Honour Reception Kremlin,at Speech The Unlike Putin, however, Medvedev does not state openly that the threat is a world dictate, but by context clues, clues, context but by worlddictate, a thethreat is openlythat notstate does Medvedev however, Putin,Unlike Kremlin, The ng, be not a butNATOpart should of thedecision

e can perhaps be accredited to personal rhetoric styles. rhetoric personal to accredited be canperhaps e generalguarantee lasting for world. peace inthe collaboratiso in international security. have We todo principles strengthened these andcontinue will planet, whyand we calm stableofand human value theimportant life principles p [The It end chapter this asbegan, perhaps appropriate it is to withaquote 2009 from the Presidential Address Presidential rice WWII] we in paid

- G eorgian Russian foreign clearly War, policy still thatplaces it indicates on withother states community, andand theinternational create a

the future, butthere ofuncertainty isapparentlya trace in

is why we so dearly want our apeacefulfuturefor sodearly is whywe

the international order during national an important art a against war Ossetia”. South - 26 Georgianstatement, Medvedev’s War,

present 2007Victory Putin’s Day in 85 - making, perhaps beingmaking, perhaps by replaced a

286_216102.shtml

in Great Patriotic War, 9 May War, Patriotic Great in

86 Thus, there

Therefore CEU eTD Collection discussi Georgianas achancewiththeduetomore WarforWest cooperation inclusive better the validity orderindeed, ofthe and seems international view even law, theRusso to collapse of the inte versus multipolarworld, andthe continuedcould existenceworld lead ofthe tothe unipolar haveworld particularlyIn a affairs, therhetoric, say inRussia. described is as this aunipolar to the collapse ofTocombatRuss thethis, system. particularlydominancecountries, US. Continually of some the rules could breaking the lead internationalInaddition, aserious law. flaw sees Russia intheinternationalorder isthe on securityUN andensured and could the thelegitimacy be only through internationalFor order. government, Russian and order the international stability depended of 2007 Kosovo, rhetoricfrom Overall, events despite such astheRusso important ons.

rnational system. At this point, however, Russia remains optimistic about system.rnational however,optimistic point, Atthis Russia remains - 2009 changed littleconceptualized interms of howRussia 27

ia continually thatmore proposes countries - Georgianrecogniand the War

and recognitionand of - tion tion CEU eTD Collection http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/17490 87 Nations the central inthe pillar international inword but also just systemnot indeed”. strict compliance withthe principleofmake ofsupremacy internationaland the United law believe international inthe primacy lawUN and mu when of “We the he states, viewed theinternational order withserious problems. as He albeit still continues intact, to previou Ministry staff.aligns His speech neatly discussed withtheand patterns inthe uncovered meeting, celebrated Diplomats’ Day Putin and overviewed ofthe themain purpose Foreign before Ukrainiancr the 3.1 surroundingof collapse theinternational the order. had changed,appearance signifiedextra bythe of the international law. and explorehowby Thischapter order will isclear 2014,it histhinking foreign policy seen recognize ofmoment,a Crimea Atthis Russia. part as anevident signs 2014addres appeared shift inPutin’s ofthis Novembercrisis Ukrainein rhetoric in in notable 2013,a brokeout appears. most shift The pressed theframework operating within existing of when internationallaws. However, the early continuedFebruary toviewPutin the as internation 2013,

C The Kremlin, Meeting with Russian ForeignM Russian with Kremlin, Meeting The

HAPTER O Before November

before, during, or afterbefore, theGeorgian during, introduces or crisis.Putin rder On February 11, 2013, Putin metwiththe RussianOn February Foreign 11,2013,Putin months Staff Ministry nine Following s chapter, and thus indicates Novembers chapter,andthat government before the thus 2013,the Russian

3 discourse. Since 2007, Putin hadSince beendiscourse. 2007,Putin stressing importance ofkeeping with the :

T 2009 HE 2013 isis began and six years beganand afterinfamous six Putin’s isis Munich Speech. Atthis

little seemedtochangelittle official regarding foreignpolicy rhetoric. As

2013: The 2013: -

OF OF P RESENT E XTRA C ontinued

inistry Staff, 11 February 2013, Accessed 15 April 2015, 15 Accessed February 2013, 11 Staff, inistry - U LEGAL KRAINIAN 28

- s totheDuma asked inwhichhe them to legal and rhetoric theincreas L

R egitimacy of egitimacy HETORIC C RISIS ANDRISIS THE al order as workingal asand order

extra change I nternational - legal

occu A

rhetoric his into rs that was not PPEARANCE ed rhetoric st strive st strive for L aw and 87

CEU eTD Collection speeches. onlydomestic in and found it isoften order, or law international theof supremacy under subsuming focus, main the it isnever Ukraine. in Revolution theOrange about questiona to in response conference press presidential 2004 a in sotechestvenniki) usednow, term the‘compatriots’ typicalto as opposed russkie, Russians(etnicheskie througho examples similar find also youcan Periodically, above. mentioned as phrases and terms similar in was discussed it well,and as discussions wassuch also Russia,there B World Russian Zevelev,The between Partnership and Cooperation Friendship, on Treaty ofthe ratification 90 89 88 3.2 how the discussed government Russian ‘compatriots abroad’ November 2013. before compatriots abroad. address.It necessaril not is issuesof intheframework the security foreignministry Russian which issues with must difficult circumstances abroad”. makes one mentionofsupporting“our small the decision true. holds UN, Toimprove necessary still thesystem,is more it toincorporatevoices into the Russo 2007 toPutin’s Therefore,similar Munich Speech is thepattern rhetoric in2009after and the andboth his years”.coming over“promote andUN] the approaches these law and principles international [from the stating is thatRussia legitimacy. Inattainablegoal consideredaddition, the UN highest instill of nonetheless. tobethe form isevidentthatPutinviewsThus, it still theinternationa

Legislation specifically dealing with citizens abroad was discussed heavily in the late 1990s with the 1990s late in the washeavily discussed abroad withcitizens dealing specifically Legislation Ibid. ForeignM Russian with Kremlin, Meeting The

E The xtra

However, there is one additional aspectHowever, there additional speech ofPutin’s isone worth He thatis noting. asFurthermore, Russia perceives essential preserving order, Putin for international the P - - Georigan The international War. law, and as order well as thesupremacy legal erce

- making process. Medvedev’s previous voice. Russia’s speeches; requires order theinternational 88 ived

R Here in a differentHere isstating ina was a Putin theme similar way presentin that hetoric hetoric

becoming more organizationsand involved ininternational must E

At this point, it is is it point, simplyAt this recognize important to exampleof as it an nd of the

oundaries y abroadcitizens unusualreferences for tomake or him toRussian

. Itat mentioneda theofother offhandedlyend is list of

I During 2002 and 2003, the year of Russian in Ukraine and Ukraine in Ukraine and yearUkraine in theof Russian 2003, and During2002 nternational nternational in istry. compatriots abroad and for Russian citizens in in abroad citizens compatriots for and Russian 29

O rder, and rder, the ut 2003 l ordera as work an but in progress - 2013, including a reference to ethnic to reference a including 2013,

Russia A ppearance of ppearance an

and Ukraine and

(See Igor Igor (See of the of However, However,

CEU eTD Collection 91 to rem 3 undergoingmoment”. a “formative producingconcepts; and exploring indeed, In itappearspartactions. time, isin being essence,forum rhetoric as at a for used this fororder internationalandfor tothenew search lawformfor a international ofjustification rhetorica foreign inRussian indicates shift policy; a from shift t issufficientis, andit todefine itas t order. underrhetoric Thisdebate chapter newamong currently, scholars is which will this other ormatching international organizations, actions Russia’s international thecurrent to the oldinternational a Rather,goal new order. international the altogether. tobuild is order international there inorderwas order tobe seems chance criticized fixed, little at repairing indicategaps theweaknesses of and th In case, rathersupport orwas this thanusinginternationaljustification,it as more to law credibilityinternational its order lost thecontinued had despite reference tointernational law. yethad change,difference The anoticeable first patt occurred. shift wereclear at new notentirely what i.e. was inthe therhetoric time, and what precisely annexation of Crimea rhetoric. occurred,in components alsoa Theofthis therewas shift international international supremacy and and order ofthe the law.whe UN However, ouchIt upononly define thegoalnew thesisto not briefly.rhetoric very is ofthe what this .2.1

Ringmar, “On the Ontological,” 456. Ontological,” “On the Ringmar,

The The ain Ukraine jointhe in Federation. Russian or The results indicated ofthe referendum On March order options: held one 16,2014,Crimea areferendumtochoose of two in Inaddition, a it point, At this isclear held view thatapositive foreignof still Russian the policy A nnexation ofCrimeannexation March2014: in

new of involve form rhetoricthelaw,appeared not the UN thatdid or

91 extra

e international order. Unlike before, where order.e Unlike international before, the - legal it may be foreign saidthatRussian mayit policy could be 30 rhetoric. The appearance of

The

A ppearance aNe of ern evident wasevident thattheern he prominence and respect

extra w R - legal hetoric n the

CEU eTD Collection 94 http://en.kremli 93 options. wereonly two as there especially inaccuratereferendum, wasillegal, claimed an it people 92 star I firstwill discussthe view ofthe international andextra order then length theconnection personal andhistorical However,the for ofcontinuity, toCrimea. sake international order. reason onthe Russia’s actions international for stageinthe current beunderstood cannot Itstandard available for tounderstand thesituation. outsiders logically followsthenthat the interpretations places;there common, ofthose otherisno two in words, Crimeaalways have for meant each other’ isaquite statement the history of places betweena thetwo vaguenotion and actions based not is onlegalityrespect orainternational forprimary the The order. reas Legal note. important to vanished, behind rhetoric but‘the Russia’s reason’ has entirely not meant for each oth a the choice history Crimea isenough toknow it and of whatalways andhave Russia Crimea figuresreferendum. However, then states: Putin ofthe “To understand reason behind such the Heprevious speeches s shown. have actions. and wouldimply This is legitimate, exists still that theinternational order as the theprimarythat legaland rhetoric ‘international norms’are still ofjustifyingRussia’s means democratic international proceduresand norms”. officials he and referendum immediatelycompliance others, states was thatthe “in held with and Sevastopolthe territory into Federation. ofthe first After Russian theDuma addressing later, addressed Putin State Duma the inorder for toask incorpora permission to that themajority theFederation. Russian wished residents tojoin ofCrimean

Ibid. Ibid. 2015, March accessed 17 2014, March 18 Federation, Russian the of AddressPresident by Kremlin, The will n paper This by the referendum. iscontroversysurrounded There ts to discussinternationalts to law interms He ofthereferendum heldinCrimea. argues,

Putin beginsPutin talkin to n.ru/events/president/news/20603 er”.

Thus, inthe beginning speech, important ofthe patterns are two

depth a depth eems to support this by supportthis going to eems thefacts then into and bout international law andbout international only order after discussing law at

At thebegi something else ot go into the controversy, but some but controversy, intogothe ot

nning appears speech it ofthe dependent

- legal first Putin rhetoric.

. ‘What Russia and Russia . ‘What international

on thepersonal 92

Two days te Crimea te Crimea

on is CEU eTD Collection 97 96 95 in the secondand Medvedev chapter, whatPutin pass has warned come against to the international previously. thathas one clearly been promoted as order, indicated Moreover, aWhile lo international order is: order. important Perhaps thestatement thespeech most in perspective regarding on Russia’s actions Ukraine. in law. Thus,byCrimea seemsattaching be toKosovo,he to delegitimizing also Russ Kosovo isaprecedent, was tothegovernment, Russian it aclear violationofinternational as From th with the UN Charter’s right self to has legitimacy lost respectability. and eventheir adisregard makesjokeaboutfor internat believes thatRussia obvious thatthe hasnot,anddoes West followinternational law. not, that theresucha thing exists as law international areFirstly, normsofagood violating law. international it’s le thatthey thing at “what colleaguesTheyfrom doweEurope our hear America? and inWestern say North we

Ibid. Ibid. Ibid. AddressPresident. by Kremlin, The

and theUN overall. if for some reasondoeswork, this not ignore they simply UN Security the Council legitimate, necessary theyinternationaland resolutions force from organisations, the destinies of onl theworld, that come tobelieveexclusivity thattheyand intheir exceptionalism, canthe decide internationalpractical law intheirthe rulehave gun. of by policies, but the They Our by partners, western led However, becomesafter hisintention discusses clear he whensoontheinternational from authorities. thecentral country’s exactly whatisdoing legitimateand Crimea now,was permission require didnot any hands… thattheunilateralagreed of when Kosovofrom they Serbia, separation Kosovo precedent e statements 2007about in seems previous Kosovo,it thatPutin odd wouldclaim ng resolutely ishighly passage, it Putin his new significant. view Here, on shows

– 97

a precedent

- determination, and moreover,that Crimeadetermination, followsthe the United States of America, guided nottobe the United prefer by States of

ycanright… they beTomake ever look aggression this He also argues that the Crimean referendum is in line also inline He arguesthatthe is Crimean referendum our western colleaguescreatedour western with their own 96 32

–

better late than never”. ional law, showinginternational how law

It ispainfully ast remember . Unilateral ia’s

He CEU eTD Collection 99 98 understand be a theremust a symbol, shared background. Sevastopol assymbolic,as once this again inorder apersonal connotation because has to feel plea;a understandas personal to wellemotional as thesignificance place, an ofthe must one the word ‘ there foreignpolicy formrhetoric inRussian isanew instance, ofFor uses discourse. Putin dear military Russian glory toour symbolising hearts, and outstanding valour”. Crimea andtheir Sevastopol and focuses and onRussia “shared pride”. Crimea’s historyand ratherjoined Russia, as ajustification than as to international law,reference and that infactdealt with the very there beginning few paragraphs ofthe isonlyone Address, reference the to somehowthat is beyondIndeed, and develops lawtheAddress. international surfaces in in noticeable foreign void inRussian policy rhetoric. seems be nolonger to explaining islegitimate. whyThis leaves theinternational order a order. provide not a Notably, does ne Putin dangers he but issaying of actions, have these thatthey finally destroyedtheinternational andwill, ineffective unlike before, ingoverning. Putin, warning longer isno about the butnowitis seeninstitute, onlyan instrument usedfor as theW the validity and legislation.Nolonger oforganizations legitimateas istheUN a held decision

Ibid. Ibid. AddressPresident. by Kremlin, The

the importance,is furtheredrather than idea knowit.This he when

Thelaw idea takingarole theappe ofinternational lesser and - making and exceptionalism havemaking and apparently exceptionalism order destroyed international and the dear to our hearts’, arelation toourinternationaldear phrase thathas to hearts’, no It law and order. is

importance to Russia, endingimportanceof these with“Each toRussia, places is w idea of maingoal theinternationalhis w idea order; 33

why

Crimea could join Russia. Instead,Crimea could Russia. join Putin

justifyingin whichCrimea theprocess

He describes thehistory of est’s bidding, bending toits

arance of a new rhetorica new arance of

refers toCrimearefers and 99

Obviously, CEU eTD Collection 102 101 one. emotionalconnec personal, ofa more implies again which “consciousness”, “ word Russian “minds,” the as purposes colloquial for perhaps 100 legal rheto is amatter order. isconcerned,as a AsPutin sharedand far due historical Crimea, to history injustices, Theimplications. addition ofplunder which ofan gives theconnotation action of Crimea was washandled it plunder, simplyunder not can but robbery, the which be law, says,“Russia realised was simply it not it that robbed, existed,continued it Union still toseem collapse, a ofRussia.theUSSR like When Putin part consideration wishesby theSoviet Khrushchev, butbecause population’s for the Nikita Crimea At wasgiven Crimea first,hestates ofwas apart that Ukraine. and situation. this law in nolonger isrelevant longexisted before current internationa the justice’, or rathertheandjustice’to justify now ‘truth inCrimea, used has actions Russia’s the framework ofthe international order thatthegenerations. currentspanned implies form of‘truth This and justic rational foundation. Furthermore, comes from thejustification ‘truththat and has justice’ appe generation…” generationfirmon truthandwasto based convictionjustice is and passed from “In

Ibid. Ibid. AddressPresident. by Kremlin, The Russian: the original Note people’s hearts and minds, hearts andpeople’s

al; another appealal; another people’s to and toa sharedbackground

Similarly, makesinteresting Putin an that regardingabout itcame statement how Moreover, when justifies Putin ric. beyond law. 101

Once again, it is important to notethat to isimportant makes it Onceagain, emotional another Putin However, notentirely itis whatat point encompassesextra this clear В сердце, в сознании людей в сознании сердце, В

100

Crimea has been always This ofRussia. an inseparable part gives howRussiaviews into theinternational insight why could apply not beyond law beyond l order. Thisindicates that the internationall order. order Crimea should be a part of Russia, he explains, beexplains, aRussia, heCrimea part should of 34

(V serdtse, v soznanii lyudei). While translated translated While lyudei). v soznanii serdtse, (V , one personal thatis withmoral and сознании

was plundered”.

in this casein this actualand because ‘truth

(soznanii)” is better translated as translated is better (soznanii)” feeling tion rather than a logical, common common logical, a than rather tion

rather than arather common,

102 away anywithout

For Russia, theloss ForRussia, e’ inthe worlde’ and - CEU eTD Collection 104 103 ethnic the politicians “were he minorities, says immediately‘disciplined’ bythe foreign the languagewasclaims which was introduced policy he that against inUkraine, the rights of internationalfor toproperly order Ukrainefor failing punish v this beforewhen appealed and tointernational Putin theUN, he admonishes legislation instead international law,Ukraine and However, isthemainissue. that violated which rather it, than Indeed,broken. believes wouldseem it showthatstill intheprimacy to Russia o developed”. with th speakers“in afriendly, and democraticcivilised state that rights wouldprotect their line in was accommodating becauseUkraine toUkraine and itexpected citizens totreatRussian following theinternational order of intention foreign isnolongerRussian the policy. only ‘heartand indicates What isthat knowninathis the mind’. priority person’s of based extra ona new, internationalwasand the order and respected law,thepast. thefuture are butthat Thepresent tied with‘the fraternal followed admits thatRussia Thus, people’. Ukrainian Putin the now is This order, standpoint. th and from this operate and However, after minds’. mentions he had thisthat Russia tocontend withthe international Once makes anemotionallegal Putin again, ratherthan orlogical appeal, referring to‘hearts of actions Russia’s Indeed, when attitude Crimea. this in confirms he mentions: Putin

Ibid. AddressPresident. by Kremlin, The

e normsof internationallaw. However”, continues,howthe not situation he “thisis Moreover, acc Putin to us. fraternal remainalways havewill people Ukrainian ofimporta and been foremost independentaour relations new on basis. Ukraine withUkraine,the Meanwhile, to proceedfromgoodand therealityour existing build we all knew inourheartsb [Crimea land] ishistoricallyRussian and minds, The under order view been ofthe has extra international subsumed 104 103

Yet, this does not indicate not thatinternationalgeneral necessarily Yet, does law this in is

- legal rhetlegal

uses Ukraine law.uses He of Russia breaking international states that

oric, which includes theideaoric, includes offraternalism which andknowledge

e past, the while ‘willremain’ future - neighbourly relations with with relations neighbourly

iolation. When referencingWhen iolation. - legal justifications justifications legal f ut we had

nce CEU eTD Collection 105 decline while another init, patt and order. than rather anextra Thus, increase in does include not muchextra new areasfailuresof international ofthe law. and Hissp order Address,Lavrovliketo howrepair Putin’s than rather as simply offer it, solutions exposes goal exactlyhowthe internationalandfault toexplain is.Much isbroken is whoseit order the internationalbrokenIndeed, as order andthough almost illegitimate. seems it on his as the 51 3 pattern thatfully not is changing. butinstead developed emergingand The confusionforeign Russian indicates that policyin someregards isworking withanew although point, this has it facetsas well minority as rights, others. ethnicism, ofnationalism, country previously. speeches form specific The extra extra violators, international and isbroken. order law appearance However, there isalsothe of one ora few international due tothe order factthatit exists nolonger it exis law still few the outside interferedwithinternal actors nosolution; and politics, Ukrainian there was International remains.suspended, butthe ideaorder case still was inthis as ineffective a only sponsors of these so .2.2 previously did

The Kremlin, AddressPresident. by Kremlin, The - Lavrov’s Fe legal which rhetoric, st

Almost a year a Almost Clearly, theinternationalnot haveat point, this theva order does Munich SecurityConference,government indicated andthe speech his Russian views

ts in draftts in form. actors . There are significanttheAddress in moments indicate that directly that bruary 2015 Munich Speech: The 2015Munich bruary . - I called politicians”. n Putin’s view, if cannotinternational order effectivelyn Putin’s thediscipline later, Sergei Lavrov, Sergei Foreignlater, ofAffairs, speech Minister delivered a at

is unusual, asis unusual, rhetoric typicallythis was indomestic and seen - legal focuses butmainly ondiscrediting rhetoric theoldrhetoric

ern is instead emerging.ern isinstead

105

36 continues by hascontinues thatthelaw only stating been -

legal thereisalready rhetoric, a noticeable - legal rhetoric is taking is not clear isnot rhetoriclegal at istaking E

nd of thend has many been violated too time eechalso notable because he is

I nternational

lidity and l and lidity O egitimacy rder

s by ly CEU eTD Collection 107 2015, Conference Security Munich the51st at debates during answersquestions 106 valid. were into nottaken echoesearlier warnings interests Russia’s Munich thespeech about inPutin’s unilateralism; building architecture an open security w wereguided and beliefs by illusions “ of all, he says thattheWest categorically hascaused the collapse the international of order: andtimes, he provides examples oftimes when internat that those preventable collapse. issues have finally ledtoits sawRussia inthe internationalsystem, and at years. theprevious against rhetoric theflaws chapter, Asdiscussedthe in fact was warn didin of theinternationaldelegitimization It have wasit order. prevented, been testedover could as by foreignpolicy Russian andunilateral(exceptionalism decision earlier theinternational Munich Speech.Essentially theproblems and order with law outlined had Lavrov argument countersthecollapse traditional byinternational of thatthe the saying order by theHehas international collapsed outrightexplainingwhy. states: how order and Thea projectofbuilding “common Europeanfailed home” ourwestern because partners

Ibid. Federation, Russian the Affairsof ofForeign Ministry clearand warning indeed,had warned Putin during signs, against potentialproblems his http://www.mid.ru/brp_4.nsf/0/4E7CDDD252FDEF1F43257DE60031E493

Lavrov additionally outright thattheinternational orderseveral collapsed asserts has fromyearsVladimir Putin these standseight ago. youIgeneral. delivered wouldlike toremind of byPresident Russian thespeech problems ofEuropean theorganisation and in inte security developmentsthe correctness confirmed warningssystemic profound, of our against sudden andcollapse rapid of for thehad existed worlddecades that order isimpossibleit toagreewith the argumentsof ou ofsome Lavrov, immediately unlike discussthe Putin, international to begins He order. starts

account, andthat part is ofthe reason order international isnolonger the

of winners in the Cold War rather War the Cold winnersthe interests in of than ith mutual respectith ofinterests”.

37 this point, Russian foreign Russian point, this policy isclaiming

Foreign Minister Sergey Lavr Sergey Minister Foreign ional law was tested and failed.ional law tested was Most 106

, 7 February 2015, Accessed 23 March March Accessed 23 2015, February 7 ,

r colleagues that therer colleaguesa was that - rnational in relations making) making)

107 ov delivers a speech and and speech a delivers ov

Lavrov thus have ledtothe … last year’slast

CEU eTD Collection 109 108 international order and isbroken, thereneeds a new be to system place. in a is changethis earlier fromthinking and ind involved inconflicts Already,organizations become than rather multilateral have involved. Lavrovmoment, have cangeneralIt isto withparties abilateral onlyprovide talks one. Medvedev suggestionstheinternatio several offered improve to discoursesand and interacting. are surfacing Putin ratherthan Therefore, before when also indicates thata‘formative there is moment’ and occurring, patterns wherein new rhetoricwas hadproblems was asystembut place therein as before, that is expressing believes thatheoccurring. still isachange there from differs this earlier Again, change of to offerremarks: a He“ solution. precisely orderand whoisat whyhas fault, theinternational take he collapse does a moment bycontinued ofunilateral practice the decision areexamples helists general proofthe further of system ofthe degrading caused international idea of‘inclusive which dialogue,’ some casesactors. onlywiththe permissionLavrov also ofa and includesthe Moreover, few many he speech.stresses First, inhis thefact principles that universal are onlyapplied in onlyThis is Lavrov’s exampleof one accusations agai meaningless ofinternational law and Heexplains: order.

Ibid. Ibid. F Russian the Affairsof ofForeign Ministry

While themajorityWhile of whereasextremists, intheUkrainiancrisi withrebels, some with opposition, casesthe governments in talkwith even to casesIraq,Afghanistan,Libya, of inclusive political dialogueWhy between theprotagonists. inthe doour partners the universal settling whichpresuppose, all, principlesabove anconflicts of internal Itforhard veryexplain usto is Lavrov also states thatAmericanparticular exceptionalism in ledtothe has historical eras”. historical

109

Ratherorder,Lavrov there thanbelievingworld that isastable Lavrov’s speech isdirectedtoward and explaining clearly

The world isnowfacingThe world aconnected shift drastic wit

again refers to the problemForLavrov, of refersagain exclusivity.the tothe whycolleagues our toapplyUkraine many of fail to ederation, ederation,

Yemen, Mali andforYemen, Sudan, South instance, Mali urge icates that the Russian government thinks the thinks thattheRussiangovernment icates 38 - makingand exceptionalism.

Foreign Minister Foreign s, ourpartners act differently… nst American of exceptionalism out

nal systemandhow, at this

still operative.Itstill

108

h the CEU eTD Collection War Patriotic 113 speech. 112 111 ofRussia. outside anarea includes it as significant thus mentionis 110 national holidayThere speech. extra isthesame Crimea,a there surge theinternational suchagainst isnot indiscourse that enters order it a light Ukraine.Y oftheevents in domestic rhetoric, ofdefending theidea thecountry’s isofparticularsignificance interests in and todefend howimportantis country’s it ourinterests”. holiday “feel citizensto causes especiallywhat it acutely II. significance War World tothe sharedstates that due the toRussia also historyfrom He acknowledgements hold indicateoutsideofRussia, still thatcertain these areas, some Dnieper, domestic importance holiday.However, ofthe does hethesacrifices near mention the Ukraine international state and ofthe speech The the order. focused on the ismuchmore be undergoing‘formative moment’. a The simultaneously patterns tobe appear appearing and interacting, indicating could Russia rhetoric, more a whilein2015much the twoVictory DayIn thetrend extra speeches, also is reflected. 2014,thereismore Marchextra 2014speech, broken,Lavrov’s which is particularly in2015Muni shown oflegitimate. Crimea inparticular, Afterthe saw annexation Russia theas internationalorder Ukrainian governmentthe Russian viewed crisis, andas still theinternational law order 3.3

The Kremlin, The his in presence their explain which also could militarybattles, important and significant had also areas These o border the city on Russian isKursk a His Sea. Black the in ending Ukraine, and Russia through fromBelarus, extending river is a Dnieper The

Victory Day Speeches in 2014 2015:and

Interestingly, speech, makes 2014 Putin very inhis referencelittle Thus farbeenclear shift a foreign hasshowninRussian rhetor policy 110 , 9 M 9 ,

in Kursk Speech at military parade marking the 69th anniversary of Victory in the 1941 the in ofVictory anniversary marking69th the militaryparade at Speech ay 2014, accessed 15 May 2015, May accessed 15 2015, ay2014, 111

and Sevastopol, aswelland other asRuss Sevastopol, several

- legal rhetoric appeared in the discussion ofin the discussion legal internationalIn appeared rhetoric affairs.

et, even in May 2014, two months after twomonths et, inMay theannexation even 2014, of fUkraine. ttention is paid tothe demise ofthepaid is internationalttention order.

http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/20989

39 -

legal rhetoric evident in Putin’s March evident rhetoric legal inPutin’s 2014 Competing

means toourhomeland be to loyal 113 ch Speech. However, inPutin’s

While this is this While perhaps typical

P atterns ian cities. to the events in in events to the

ic. Up tothe Up ic. 112 – 1945 Great Great 1945

His His

- legal CEU eTD Collection 115 http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/49438 th 114 international asand orderthesystem legitimate.While law beyond flaws, not was it had countries. II War theUS, France,Britain, victory, Mongolia,India, including and Great CIS China, further by several of notion supportsthis thecontributions mentioning totheWorld states shoul needsit ofa becreation’ to ‘thenew and one thinks non He instead thatthe “creation proposes be of should a abasedglobal “regional system” onand but rather thanwarning against he ‘strong it, indicates that foundation respected for not itis orhementions the Again, problem followed. of unipolarity, Thus, simila amount oninternational lawfor and especially a order, domestic states: speech. He offersPutin aLavrov proposed system, tothe oneremarks similar new afair proffered. Putin apparent. the po alsoindicates This present2014 speech his totheLavrov’s Duma in 2015Address and more become have the international onceIn 2015Victory has Putin’s resurged. order again Speech theideas Day legal rhetoric present. thecollapsepoint, international ofquite theas significant orderextra andthere isnot ismore speech wh e 1941 e

Ibid. Ibid. Kremlin, The - block basis”.

– In conclusion, was it shown development. strong increasingly sawWe ignored… attemptsa toestablish unipolar world. see We the in the lastdecades, yearInstead, overa a after little the anne 1945 Great Patriotic War, 9 May 2015, accessed 10 May10 accessed 2015, 9 May War, 2015, Great Patriotic 1945

en he refers to the shared anden inside Russia. hetonear Thus,at historyofterritories refers this rlyLavrov, stresses thattheinternational Putin to broken systemis because the - Speech at military parade on Red Square in Moscow to mark the 70th anniversary of Victory in in Victory of markanniversary the 70th to Moscow in Square Red on militaryparade at Speech armgaining blockthinkingthat underminesglobal sustainable All momentum. 115

Therefore,again onceindicates as the broken, there Putin systemis 114

the basic principles of basic cooperation international have tobethe come

ssibility that competing patterns are at play.ssibilityare competing patternsat that Moreover, that in2013thegovernment Russian viewed still

40 xation of Crimea, ofxation theperceivedcollapse

d be based onmultilateralism. He - arm blockthinkin

g’ iswinning.

- CEU eTD Collection foreignRussian policy developinbut is has discourse appeared not rhetoric isfacing Russia indicatesmoment’ wherein apattern that anew ‘formative in Lavrov and continue tostress Putin The the demiseinternational competing ofthe system. Duma. Notably, in2015,extra actions,Russia’s which isseen2014Victory inPutin’s the DayAddress to Speechand des exceptionalismRussia, andunilateralism, had issuesRussia warned two against, eventually broken violated sofrequently because ithasbeen actors, byother US.To primarily the justifying actions its ofrepair. Crimea,inrhetoric. shift thereisadistinct annexation Rather the After than 2014 troyedof thelegitimacy anew theworld this, Due rhetoric order. appears tojustify to

based oninternational nowviewsbased the internationalsystem law, Russia as - legal as e apparent, rhetoric does albeit it isnot 41

xist. Rather xist. CEU eTD Collection tendencies,asIfat continuallyNATO or keeping bay. foreign Russian policy didindeed understoodcontinuation as aRussia’s as void it this to fill is unclearas well as apparentlyfromfading use. order v filling rather the than foreign policy discourse broken particularlyLavrov’s international Yet in Russian order, Munich visible Speech. hasInstead, already a begun smaller role. toplay thereis strongest likely 2014,most totheInrhetoric annexationof in Crimea. due already 2015,this aspects historical claims, and others. ofnationalism, ethnicism, Extra actions Ukraine.its in rulesextra The of the international broken. introduces order isnow Moreover, Russia extra of Crimea, a change but maintained the legitimacy ofthe internationalorder andUN. the internationa rule that werefrequentlyrepeated were unilateral perceived decision exclusive and however, 2009, changes emerged including inthe appearanceextra discourse, the of during, war afterthe and 2008 foreign policychanges appears through indiscourse - breaking. This is exemplified reactionin Russia’s exemplified tothe recognitionbreaking. Thisis ofKosovo.Yet, the

the Russian Federation still usedlegal Federationthe Russian still inorder rhetoric to Since a has shift theRusso occurred, Inwith the beginning 2013crisisUkraine, and theannexation ofthein in2014with By comparing Russo the claim that the internat l order was not broken. Instead, broken. continuallywasl orderwarned these not against issues Russia begins to occur to begins foreign inRussian before, policyUnlike discourse. the appearsfocusing the beontheabsence tomerely international of oid frequently on relied ional system or law were problems.ional system orlaw without Twomain issues -

left by it Georgianand Russian ashiftin Ukrainian WarCrisis, C supposed long ONCLUSION . The ill . The - - legal rhetoriclegalclear; the are notentirely Georgian and be cannot Ukrainian Crisis War 42

- defined extra

legal rhetoric, while in 2014 multiple legalwhile in2014multiple rhetoric, .

Russian foreignRussian policy before,discourse

- standing imperialistic or aggressivestanding imperialistic

an increase in the discussion ofdiscussion the an inthe increase - legal rhetoric cannot rhetoric legal besaid justify its actions. Itjustify actions. its di

legal rhetoric. Inlegal rhetoric. 2007 - -

legal rhetoriclegal tojustify legal rhetoriclegal appears - making and re arere d not - , CEU eTD Collection ambitions. moment’. A relatively u patterns. a During time, state this a can type ofidentity crisis, undergo or ‘formative therepoint, competing are multiple disco the dis ispossible competing it then narratives, something new there being thecurrent into However, introduced when are discourse. many Irregularitiesstrategies, mean thusdonot et thatthere cetera. apattern, butthat isnot th discourse. andthe exploration fluctuation They ofcompeting concepts, indicate ideas, reflect how,in formation, meaning isasmallpart a thatit to bigger picture. and patterns rules Second, that foreign ways.First,amoment isunderstood intwo is discursive it policy. Discourse perceives theinternationalas order beingand itselfbroken illegitimate. foreignRussian policy does has justified Instead,not disappeared altogether. there While is more complex. are nation the appearanceextra of the foreign policy dis would nothave occurredeither. 2008. a new rhetorical o pattern continue linearly Russo from the reversed, international against order. speaking law and Additionally, if More From this,

Russia

over this case,athis stateact can ands ’ s

, t coursehas occurred between 2007

actions, theperceived with of the collapse international legalrhetoric order, it must be must concludedit that differen theare events he changef inRussian he

the goal inrhetoric ward shift eventsNATO,the off a was of both to then nified state narrative astatenified allows r the disappearance same had rhetoric ofthe it legitimizing used in - legal rhetoric,nationalistic aspects,legal actual the mainly picture the

not merely

- Georgian there War, then notbethe emergence wouldbe of

it has changed. Rather haslegalit changed. thanbefore rhetoric when indicate a surge that but a innationalism, indicate alistic tendencieslegal rhetoric inthe discourse, urses, which urses, oreign policya inRussian indicates shift discourse imultaneouslyform identity its 43 course change will perceptiblya because

and some 2014.While

will undoub will

This change to realize and

tedly new form rules and t and that a shift in Russian in Russian and thata shift t

shows further

scholars appear in

that c Russia Russia

its its

urrent focus on focus t this t this ere is

has has CEU eTD Collection Yet, a time, with clearerdiscourse which require research. will emerge, should further hindered by t Interacting foreignRussia’s settled. not policyinternationally has withRussia be will countries. Yet, ot instead issimplyemphasi be saiddefinitively which at moment rules this isusing. Russia foreign Russian policy ‘formative moment,’concepts, exploring wherein is other it etcetera,and cannot strategies, it rhetoric, thepattern only isnot it emerging. Russ imperialistic tendencies.Second, qualities inRussia’s whilethereare nationalistic extra 2014. Clearly,beenchange a therehas policy asacting isnot entirely isnot it unified a under narrative. single This processmeaning, happening is rapidly,at currentlyforeign the andmoment, Russian while the ontheperceived continued emphasis inthe collapse international void left by The rhetoric. legal rhetoric useof nationalistic appears tobe already decreasing, rhetoric indica thereRussia; that longer isno inter foreign policy absence rhetoric, its i legitimacy was order adiscursive international inRussian ofthe andAs staple this law. foreignRussia’s policy along withcertain First, ramifications. ofthe there istheloss nationalundoubtedly framework, Therefore, i From thechanges thereappe in discourse, he loss of a commonhe framework ofa loss asforeign anunclear well Russian policy. tes that severalcetera ideas,tes that et strategies, areinteracting competing and inthe her extra her t is necessary toreevaluate necessary t is foreign Russian policy betwee zing theend of theinternationaland order t - legal indicating hasaltogether, rhetoric disappeared not that

particular s noticeable. If nolonger Russia acommons noticeable. respects

other states will findmorewill it difficult interact to other with states ,

and

common base.appearance Second,commonextra the of

44 is not simplyis not a

ia cania possibly besta describedas be having arseveral in emerging tobe patterns n indication of possible Russia’s n indication

he fault ofotherhe fault

order is growing.order is n 2008 and n 2008

- - legal legal

CEU eTD Collection 2005 2004 2003 specific asterisk speech, whileno indicatesspeech. a domestic An asteriskan aste international (*) indicates speech,two 3. 2. 1. 13. 12. 11. 10. 9. 8. 7. 6. 5. 4.

http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/22869 **March 19: - **Ma http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/22794 **January UkrainianViktor Yushchenko 24:Meeting with President http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/22795 **January 24: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/speeches/48213 December 683c3256f740024dec4!OpenDocument http://mid.ru/bdomp/brp_4.nsf/e78a48070f128a7b43256999005bcbb3/4fb0f1f9c0d53 *December 23: d7cbc3256f73004f2636!OpenDocument http://mid.ru/bdomp/brp_4.nsf/e78a48070f128a7b43256999005bcbb3/8b0195a871eb LettersPresentation Credentials of of December 22:SpeechPresidentata Russian VladimirPutin Ceremony by of fc3256f580041c274?OpenDocument http://www.mid.ru/brp_4.nsf/e78a48070f128a7b43256 Russia Federation,Russian Vladimi *Novemberspeech 26:Openinganswerstoquestionsby andthe thePresident of http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/speeches/22453 May Day 9:Victory Spe http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/speeches/22333 Ukraine Rada Pereyaslavl 350thAnniversary and ofthe the **January 23: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/speeches/22272 December Address Year’s 31: New WarPatriotic May 9: http://en.kremlin.ru/e **Januarythe Opening atofRussia Year 27:Speech inUkraine

http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/22867 rch 19: - EU summit, TheEU summit, Hague Speech at a Reception toMark theSpeech at 58thAnniversary aReception Victory ofinthe Great 31: New Year’s Address Year’s 31: New

Press Conference ofRus Results onthe Beginningof Meeting Yulia Prime Minister withUkrainian Timoshenko - Speech at the Ceremony Speech at marking the Press Conference FollowingPress Conference Russian

http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/trans Press Conference by President Vladimir Putin Press Vladimir Conferenceby President A vents/president/transcripts/21849 PPENDIX ech - r Putin, ata pressr Putin, joint conferenceat the the end of

1 :

- - L

IST OF - 45

S PEECHES risks (**) a indicate country - End of Russia in theYear of Ukrainian Talks sian

999005bcbb3/f2bf256d6eb8afe

cripts/speeches/21992 Ukrainian Talks

- -

CEU eTD Collection 2008 2007 2006 19. 18. 17. 16. 15. 14. 28. 27. 26. 25. 24. 23. 22. 21. 20.

http://mid.ru/brp_4.nsf/newsline/A59A69A0C7C68415C32574A500375421 Grigory Ossetia, Karasin South on (Interview Secretarywith State G.B.Rossii Karasina Osetii,o Yuzhnoi po *August http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/speeches/31 May ml http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/text/speeches/2008/04/04/1949_type82915_163150.sht of theRussia *April 4: ml http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/text/speeches/2008/02/14/1011_type82915_160266.sht February 14: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/speeches/24755 December http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/sp November May Day 9:Victory Speech dyn/content/article/2007/02/12/AR2007021200555_pf.html Policy *February Prepared 10:Putin’s atthe43 Remarks http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/speeches/23988 December Ad Year’s 31: New http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/23882 November Unity 4:National Day Speech May Day 9:Victory Speech http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/speeches/23370 December Year’ 31: New http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/speeches/23252 November Unity 4:National Day Speech May Day 9:Victory Speech 7086.shtml http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/text/speeches/2005/04/25/2031_type70029type82912_8 April 25:

9: Victory Day9: Victory Speech –

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp 14: Press and Statement Questions Answers Following toJournalists’ Annual totheFederal Address Federation Assemblyof theRussian 31: New Year’s Address Year’s 31: New 4: National Unity4: National Day Speech

Interv’yu stats - Transcript of AnnualTranscript Conference Big Press NATO Council s Address - - sekretarya - - -

- http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/24238 http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/23576 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4528999.stm dress

Deputy Minister of Deputy Foreign Affairs Minister of Russia published published in the weekly"Russia - – -

46 –

zamestitelya Ministra inostrannykh del Ministra inostrannykh zamestitelya - - -

publikovannoe“Rossiya” vezhenedel’nike - rd eeches/24648

Munich Conference Security on

") -

a Meeting

CEU eTD Collection 2010 2009 32. 31. 30. 29. 45. 44. 43. 42. 41. 40. 39. 38. 37. 36. 35. 34. 33.

http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/speeches/9976 December http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/statements/9 December http://en.k November 4: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/statements/8882 *September http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/statements/7688 May 9:V http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/statements/7518 April District April 1: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/presi December Address Year’s 31:New Federation November Address 12:Presidential http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/statements/5148 ** Council *July 24: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/speeches/4016 May Day 9:Victory Speech http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/trans Federation,Russian Republic ofAbkhazia theRepublic Ossetia theand ofSouth * http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/speeches/6033 December http://en.kreml November Unity 4:National Day Speech Ossetia CooperationAssistance ofAbkhazia and and withthe MutualRepublics South **September 17: ml http://archive August 26: *April 30: August

21:

- - - Speech

http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/statements/1436 ictory Dayictory Speech http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transc Joint NewsJoint Conference UkraineViktor Yanukovych withPresident of Opening at Remarks Meeting Members withPermanent o http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/statements/4876 remlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/speeches/9425 8: 31: New Year’s Address Year’s 31: New 31: New Year’s Address Year’s 31: New 24: -

Statement by President ofRussiaDmitryStatement by Medvedev

Speech at Ce

10 http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/statements/5979 Excerpts from Conversation Ossetia Excerpts from withResidentsofSouth

.kremlin.ru/eng/text/speeches/2008/08/26/1543_type82912_205752.sht National UnityNational Da

Review th of in.ru/events/president/transcripts/speeches/1966 :

at Meeting with Leaders North within Federalat Caucasus Republics Meeting with of Meeting Statements following Signing of theTreatiesStatements following Friendship, Signing of on remonythe forBilateral Signing between Documents with leading foreign and Russian political analysts e Yearwith President ofRussia - -

dent/transcripts/speeches/6557 y -

- - - to the Federal Assembly to theRussian ofthe

- cripts/statements/3921

ripts/statements/7308

888

f Security -

CEU eTD Collection 2014 49. 2012 48. 47. 46. 2011 62. 61. 60. 59. 58. 57. 56. 55. 54. 53. 2013 52. 51. 50.

http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcript March 18: http://en.kremlin. March http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/speeches/20022 December Address Year’s 31:New - **December 17: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/statements/19825 December 12: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/speeches/1 November Unity 4:National Day Speech http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/speeches/19161 *September 5: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/speeches/18963 ** http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/speeches/18092 May http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/speeches/17490 *February http://en.kremlin.ru/events/presi December http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/speeches/16752 November http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/speeches/15272 May 9 http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/statements/ March 2: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/speeches/14193 December http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/speeches/13340 November Unity 4:National Day Speech medvedev May Day 9:Victory Speech

http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/19853 J uly 28: 9: Victo : Victory Day: Victory Speech 18: Address to Russian Citizens: Citizens: Russian Address to -

11: Address Year’s 31: New Address Year’s 31: New Meeting theRussianFederation: ofCrimea’s inSupport to Accession PresidentAddress by ofthe Federation: Russian Celebrations ofCelebrations gives 4:

ry Day Speech National UnityNational Day

Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly: AddressPresidential the to Meetin Opening RemarksOpening - victory Speechat ameeting ofthe ru/events/president/transcripts/statements/20603 g with Russian Foreigng Russian with staff Ministry - parade Russian NavyUkrainianRussian and Day Day Navy - - -

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/ximaco_president - dent/transcripts/speeches/17260 speech_news

at BRIC the meeting of leaders Speech - - -

- - -

Russian

s/speeches/20607 - Ukrainian InterstateUkrainian Commission

9562 - 14647

CEU eTD Collection 2015 68. 67. 66. 65. 64. 63. 72. 71. 70. 69.

May Day 9:Victory Speech http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/speeches/47878 March 18: http://www.mid.ru/brp_4.nsf/0/4E7CDDD252FDEF1F43257DE60031E493 during Mu at debates the 51st *February 7: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/speeches/47446 December 31 http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/statements/47173 December 4 http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/speeches/ November 4: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/statements/46554 * http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/speeches/46506 **August 29: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/speeches/46262 *July 21: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/speeches/20993 May Day 9:Victory Speech September

Statement by President ofRussia the

Concert Ce Concert

: 3:

: New Year’s Address Year’s : New Foreign Minister SergeyLavrov questions aForeign delivers answers Minister speech and Presidential

National UnityNational Day President of Russia Vladimir Puti President of The Plan’ for ‘Putin Ukraine in conflict settling the lebrating Reunification Crimean Address to the Federal Assembly Address theFederal to - -

nich Security Conference http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcr

Speech -

Vladimir Putin Vladimir n addressed Novorossiya militia -

46916 -

ipts/49438

CEU eTD Collection Palgrave 2011. Macmillan, ForeignRussian Policy inthe 21 Nygren,Bertil. Georgia and “Russia Morgenthau, Hans http://mearsheimer.uchicago.edu/pdfs/Ukrain Provoked Putin.” Mearshimer, Fault:West’s “WhytheUkraine Th the is John. Crisis higher http://globalnews.ca/news/1177664/will higher.” Logan, 95, no.3(September 547 2001): Lebow, RichardNed. “Thucydides theConstructivist,” London, York: New Routledge, 1997. Larsen, 8 May 2015. King,Five “The Charles. Organization Hall, and Michael international a “Hobbes reconsideration.” C. relations: Foreign Policy Analysis Gaskarth, 27. Garst,“Thucydides Daniel.and Neorealism.” http:// belonging.” E.“Consuming Jon Fox, thenation: Holidays, and theproductioncollective of sports, Foucault, Michel. war Newsweek Blank, 1968): 1 LloydBitzer, F.

- about dx.doi.org/10.1080/01419870500465207 -

Stephen. “Putin’s UkraineFoundingStephen. a RussianEmpire.” “Putin’sWar isAboutNew ukraine

Nick. “Will Crimea be aNick. CrimeaProbably repeat beWar? “Will ofGeorgia stakes Russia’s not,but are Henrik. - Global News 14.

- Jaime. “Discourses of andConstruction Jaime. British Ethics: TheSocial Foreign Policy.” , 6 April 2015. Accessed, 6April4 2015. founding Ethnic and Racial Studies Racial Ethnic and

https://w

50, No.2(Spring 1996): 213 - euromaidan/ Discourse Analysis and Foreign Policy: France, Britain andEurope France, AnalysisandForeignPolicy: Britain Discourse “The Rhetorical Situation. Foreign Affairs, The Archaeology of Knowledge. The ofKnowledge. Archaeology .

“TheNew Movement.” Diplomacy of - new , 28February 5May 2014.Accessed 2015, ww.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russia

2, (20 - - russian Day War.”

06): 325 - - st 559. empire

September/October 2014:1 Century, – Foreign Affairs Foreign May 2015.

From Confrontation to War: What is Whatis In War: From to Next?” Confrontation 29, no.2(August Accessed May 2006). 6,2015. - 341. IBLIOGRAPHY - - crimea 319832 ” -

236. ed

Penn State UniversityPenn Press e%20Article%20in%20Foreign%20Affairs.pdf 50 International Studies Quarterly International ited byKanet, Roger 101 .

be . http://www.newsweek.com/putins

- New York: Pan repeat

(November/December 2008). Accessed American Political

- Encounter of - fsu/2008 - georgia - 12. Accessed 12January12. Accessed 2015.

theon Books, 1972. Books, theon e Liberal Delusionthat e , - - 11 war (August 1974) (August - - 120. London: 120.

01/five 1, No. 1(January 1, International International - russia

Science Review

33, (1989): 3 - - day stakes - ukraine - : . war 52

- - . 56.

- -

CEU eTD Collection 2015. anniversary the1941 Victory of in TheRussia, Kremlin,at Speech military RedSquare paradetomark the on inMoscow 70th http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/20989 the 1941 TheRussia, Kremlin, http://archi Meeting the Russia of Questions TheRussia, and Statement Kremlin, Answers toJournalists’ Press Followinga http: Federation TheRussia, Kremlin, Accessed 15April 2015. TheRussia, Kremlin,February Meeting Foreign Staff. withRussian Ministry 11 2013. html http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/text/speeches/20 One, NTV Rossia, TheRussia, Kremlin, Accessed 17March 2015. Russia http weekly Minister opublikovannoe vezhenedel’nike “Rossiya” zamestitelya Ministra inostrannykhOsetii, G.B. Rossii Karasina poYuzhnoi del MinistryRussia, Foreign Affairs of http://www.mid.ru/brp_4.n Conference Lavrovand deliversa answersquestions during speech Munich Security at debates the 51st MinistryRussia, Foreignthe Federation, Russian Affairs of of Relations Ringmar,Ontological“OnState.” the Erik. ofthe Status dyn/ http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp The March Washington February Post, 17,2015. 10,2007.Accessed Vladimir. "Putin'sPutin, Prepared Munich atConferenceSecurity Remarks 43rd on Policy." :// content/article/2007/02/12/AR2007021200555_pf.html. //archive.kremlin.ru/eng/speeches/2009/11/12/1321_type70029type82912_222702.shtml .

mid http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/49438 , The Kremlin, Federation.Russian President by Address ofthe 18March 2014.

– Russia of

. 1945 Great War Patriotic 2, no.4(1996): 439 ru . 12 November 2009.. 12November Accessed 2015. 25April ve.kremlin.ru/eng/text/speeches/2008/04/04/1949_type82915_163150.shtml

. 7 February2015. Accessed. 7 23March 2015. Foreign / brp ") _4. .

. 31 August 2008. Accessed 7 May. 31August Accessed 2008. 7 2015. 14

nsf Affairs August 2008. Speechat military paradeVictory 69thanniversary marking of in the - AddressPresidential theFederal to the Russian Assemblyof Interviewgiven by / NATO Council. 4April Council. 2008.Accessed NATO 19April 2015. newsline http://en.kremlin.ru/events/presiden http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/20603 sf/0/4E7CDDD252FDEF1F43257DE60031E493

of -

Russia 466. / A – 59 . 9MayAccessed 15May 2014. 2015.

1945 Great War. 9 May Patriotic Acces 2015. Accessed of the Federation Russian of -

A Grigory 69

DmitryMedvedev Channels Channel toTelevision A 0 C (

7 08/08/31/1850_type82912type82916_206003.s I 7 Karasin nterview C May 2015.

. 68415

C with European Journal of International of European Journal 32574

South

. t/news/17490 State

, Foreign Minist Interv’yu stats A

Ossetia

500375421

Secretary , published

. .

er Sergey sekretarya Deputy sed 10May sed

the

–

CEU eTD Collection 16707 Accessed 4May 2015. Zevelev, european http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/15/moscow celebrations.” Walker, Century, Skak, ukraine/ http://globalinterests.org/2014/04/24/the Global Interests Shakirov, Oleg. inGeorgia: “TheWar Lessons for inUkraine.” 2008 theCrisis shift 2014. Accessed 5May 2015. Peter.Rutland, “A ParadigmForeign Russia’s in Shift Pol http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/text/speeches/2008/02/14/1011_type82915_160266.shtml Accessed 19 April 2015. TheRussia, Kremlin, http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/text/speeches/2008/08/26/1543_type82912_205 Accessed 7 May 2015. TheRussia, Kremlin, http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/24238 VictoryGreat War. 9May Patriotic inthe Acces 2007. TheRussia, Kremlin,at Speech the Military CelebratingAnniversary Parade the62nd of http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/text/speeches/2009/05/09/1613_type127286_216102.shtml War.Patriotic 9Ma TheRussia, Kremlin,at of Speech 64thAnniversaryVictory Reception inHonour Great - in

. Mette. “Russia’s ‘MonroeIn New Doctrine’”.

russia . Shaun. “Western leaders’Shaun. “Western Victory overcasts shadow Russia’sDay lavish snub

- Igor. “TheBoundaries.” World Russian edited E.Kanet, by Roger 138 kim - - The Guardian jong s - , 24 April 2014. Accessed 18 May 2015. 2014.Accessed, 24April 18May foreig - y Accessed 25April 2009. 2015. un TranscriptBig ofAnnual Conference Press Statement by Dmitry ofRussia President Medvedev - n 9 http://eng.globalaffairs.ru/number/The - - policy/500352.html may , 15April 2015.Accessed 18May 2015. http://www.themoscowtimes.com/opinion/article/a - russia - ukraine - - 154. London 154. 2008 . .

52 - war

Russia in Global Affairs, inGlobal Russia - in Russian Foreign Policy inthe Foreign21 Russian Policy : Palgrave2011. Macmillan, - georgia

sed 19 April 2015. sed 19 - defiant icy.” - - Russian lessons The Moscow Times The Moscow -

. 14 February. 14 2008. victory - - for World - day - . 26 August. 2008. the

7 June 2014. June - 752.shtml - - parade crisis Boundaries Center on - paradigm

, 18May - in - st -

- -