Insect Pests of Cowpeas Vigna Unguiculata(L.)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Insect Pests of Cowpeas Vigna Unguiculata(L.) \\ INSECT PESTS OF CCWPEAS VIGNA UNGUICULATA (L.) WALP. AND STUDIES ON COWPEA YIELD ASSESSMENT UNDER DIFFERENT CHEMICAL SPRAY REGIMES AND MINIMUM USE OF INSECTICIDES AGAINST THE DOMINANT INSECT PEST SPECIES AT KATUMANI DRYLAND RESEARCH STATION, KENYA • By FLORENCE R.A.|mABONGA p.r.EN accepted foe 1HI8 THESIS n \<2 ...... i h e d e g r f f t £KL> A Ci'.PV p {~ i LACED TUB* JMUVEBSI'XV LiUUARY A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment for the Degree of Master of Science in the University of Nairobi. DECLARATION BY CANDIDATE This is my original work and has not been presented for a degree in any other University. F.R.A. Mabonga DECLARATION BY SUPERVISOR This thesis has been submitted for examination with my approval as University Supervisor. Professor Canute P.M. Khamala 111 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TITLE ............................................. i DECLARATION........................................ii TABLE OF CONTENTS................................iii LIST OF TABLES...................................vii TEXT OF FIGURES.................................. x LIST OF PLATES...................................xii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.................................xiv ABSTRACT...........................................xv CHAPTER 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES, LITERATURE REVIEW AND GENERAL MATERIALS AND METHODS ............................ 1 1.0 GENERAL INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES.......................... 1 1.10 LITERATURE REVIEW................... 4 1.20 GENERAL MATERIALS AND METHODS.... -.17 CHAPTER 2 INSECT PESTS OF FIELD COWPEA CROP IN KENYA....................... 25 2.0 INTRODUCTION........................ 25 2.10 MATERIALS AND METHODS................25 2.20 RESULTS 27 2.21 List of Field cowpea Insect Pests,Plant Part Attacked and their Pest Status at Katumani Dryland Agricultural Research Station...................... 27 2.22 Brief Description of Common Feild Cowpea Insect Pests at Katumani Dryland Agricultural Research Station....................... 36 2.23 Relative Abundance of Common Major Cowpea Insect Pest Species during 1978 and 1979 short and long rainy seasons respectively................. 46 2.24 Seasonal Abundance of some of the Common major cowpea insect pest species at Katumani during short (1978) and long (1979) rainy seasons....................... 48 2.30 DISCUSSIONS........................ 62 V Page CHAPTER 3 DETERMINATION BY SEED YIELD ASSESSMENT OF THE MOST SUITABLE PERIOD TO APPLY INSECTICIDES ON SOLE CROP COWPEA FOR EFFECTIVE PROTECTION AGAINST INJURIOUS INSECT PESTS....................... 56 3.0 INTRODUCTION....................... 56 3.10 MATERIALS AND METHODS............. 58 3.11 Seed Yield Assessment....... 61 3.20 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ............ 61 3.21 Effect of Spraying on flower and pod production............ 61 3.22 Influence of various insecticidal spraying regimes against insect pests on seed yields by ten cowpea varieties...................... 63 CHAPTER 4 DETERMINATION OF MINIMUM INSECTICIDAL USE FOR CONTROL OF THE DOMINANT COWPEA CROP INSECT PESTS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE GROUNDNUT APHID APHIS CRACCIVQRA KOCH ............ 68 4.G INTRODUCTION...................... 68 VI Page 4.10 MATERIALS AND METHODS.......... 68 4.20 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION............. 70 CHAPTER 5 GENERAL DISCUSSION................. 75 REFERENCES............... :...................... 79 V 1 1 LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1. A list of Field Cowpea Insect Pests, Plant Part Attacked and their Pest Status at Katumani Dryland Agricultural Research Station............................ 29 Table 2. Relative Abundance of the common major Cowpea Insect pests at Katumani Dryland Agricultural Research Station during the 1978 and 1979 short and long rainy seasons respectively....... 47 Table 3A. Seasonal Abundance of the common major cowpea insect pest species at Katumani during short (1978) and long (1979) rainy seasons as shown by random stem, flower and pod sampling...................... 49 Table 3B. Seasonal Abundance of the common major cowpea insect pest species at Katumani during short (1973) and long (1979) rainy seasons as shown by sweep-net sampling...... 50 v i i i Page Table 4 Dates of planting, insecticide application and first harvest of cowpea at Katumani , Kenya, 1 978/79.................... 59 Table 5 Days to first flower appearance of 10 varieties of cowpea under different spray regimes at Katumani , 1979 ................... 62 Table 6 Seed yield performance by ten cowpea varieties grown during the short rains of 1978 at Katumani and treated with insecticide twice, at germination and at first flower appearance and with the control.... 64 Table 7 Seed yield performance by ten cowpea vari eties. grown during the long rains of 1979 at Katumani and •treated with insecticide four times at 14 days intervals from germin­ ation to 55 days after planting (D.A.P.) (Block A) (Pre-flowering); and from 55 to 97 D.A.P. (Block B) (Post-flowering), with the control..65 Table 8. Plant growth habit, dates of sampling, number of times sprayed and yields of the ten cowpea varieties studied at Katuraani during the short rains crop of 1978........................... Table 9. Plant growth habit, dates of spraying, number of times sprayed and yields of the ten cowpea varieties studied at Katumani during the short rains crop X TEXT OF FIGURES Figure 1 Field Layout of Experimental Plots and Subplots Figure 2a Wingless Adult of Groundnut aphid Aphis cracci vora Figure 2b Winged Adult of Groundnut aphid Aphis cracci vora Figure 2c Showing drawing of the Nycnph Groundnut aphid Aphis craccivora Figure 3a Drawing of Adult Callosobruchus maculatus Figure 3b. Antennae of Callosobruchus maculatus showing sexual dimorphism Figure 4a. Drawing of Adult Flower thrip Megalurothrips sjostedti Figure 4b Drawing of Nymph of the flower thri p "egalurothrips / sjostedti Figure 5 Field Layout of Plots for the Determination by Seed Yield Assessment of the Most Suitable Period to Apply Insecticides on Sole Crop Cowpea for li fetuvs protection Against Injurious Insect Pests xi Figure 6 Effect of insecticide applications on flowering patterns and flower production in ten varieties of cowpea Figure 7. Effects of insecticide app1icationson pod formation patterns and pod production in ten varieties of cowpea . LIST OF PLATES Plate 1. Adult Spiny Brown Coreid bug Acanthomia horrida showing characteristic pronounced thoracic spines Plate 2a. Mature Larva of cutworm Agrotis segetum Plate 2b. Male and Female Adults of cutworm A. segetum Plate 3 Male and Female Adults of Giant Coreid bug Anop1ocnemi s curvi pes Plate 4 Groundnut Aphid Aphi s ere cci vora on cowpea young shoots in the field at Katumani Plate 5a Straight cowpea pods before attack by the Groundnut Aphid Aphis craccivora in the field at Katumani Plate 5b Cowpea pods at initial stage of attack by the Groundnut Aphid Aphis cracci vora Place 5c. Second stage of attack of cowpea pods by Groundnut Aphid Aphis craccivora / Pods curve in severe attack Plate 6<j Aduit African uoiiworin ne \ i o ut i s a rm i ge r a at rest Plate 6b Mature Larva of African bollworm Heliothis o v»m ] nof 9 xi i i Plate 7 Adult beetle of Lagri a vi11osa i Plate 8a Showing mature larva of legume pod borer Maruca testulalis Plate 8b Showing characteristic wing markings on Legume Pod borer Maruca testu1 a 1is Plate 9 Nymph and Adult of Green stink bug Nezara vi ri du 1 a Plate 10 Showing Green stink bug Nezara vi ridula mating on cowpea crop in the field at Katumani xi v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was carried out at Katumani Dryland Research Station of the Ministry of Agriculture, Machakos District. I am grateful to the then Director of the station, Mr. A.M. Marimi, for the facilities put to my disposal. I am most grateful to the Federal Republic of Germany for granting me the scholarship (DAAD) that enabled me to carry out these studies. My special thanks go to my Supervisor, Professor C.P.M. Khamala, whose supervision and constant encouragement made the completion of this work possible. I wish tc express sincere gratitude to the entire- technical staff of Zoology Department especially Mr. N. Mwanga who solved my photographic problems. I am thankful to the staff of the National Agricultural Laboratories, Nairobi; the National Museums of Kenya, Nairobi; and Commonwealth Institute of Entomology, London, for their assistance in identification of many of my insect specimens. The typing talents of two ladies, Mrs. Ruth Watulo and Miss Martha Ndwiga enabled me to type both my scripts and final thesis. Most of all, I am grateful to members of my family especially my husband for their patience and enccurange iient. throughout the course of inv work. XV ABSTRACT Studies to identify major insect pests attacking cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp., in the field and to assess cowpea yields under different chemical control regimes were conducted at Katumani, Kenya during the short and the long rainy seasons of 1978 and 1979 respectively. From materials collected in unsprayed plots, the cowpea crop was found to be attacked by a total of 43 species of insects which were classified into seven orders: Diptera (1), Coleoptera (10), Heteroptera (15), Homoptera (3), Lepidoptera (8), Orthoptera (4) and Thysanoptera (2). Only a few of these were considered major pests, namely, Acanthomi a horri da Germ, A g r o 11s seqetum D and S, Anoplocnemis curvipes F., Aphis cracci vora Koch,. Cal 1 osobruchus macul at us Fab., Heli oth i s armi gera Hb , L a gr i a v i11 os a Fab., Maruca tes tula 1i s Geyer, Mega!urothri ps sjostedti Trybom, Nezara vi ri dula
Recommended publications
  • 1983 Annual Report Technical Summary the Bean/Cowpea Collaborative
    1983 ANNUAL REPORT TECHNICAL SUMMARY THE BEAN/COWPEA COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH SUPPORT PROGRAM ( CRSP) MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY Furced through USAID/BIFAD Grant NJo. AID/DSAN-XII-G-0261 The complete 1983 Technical Summary is available in Spanish. The reports of those projects underway in Brazil are available in Portuguese and those in Senegal and Cameroon are available in French. These special language editions are available from the MO. For further information contact: Bean/Cowpea CRSP 200 Center for International Programs Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1035 U.S.A. Telephone: (517) 355-4693 Telex: 810-251-0737 MSU INT PRO ELSG COVER PHOTOS: Center -- Rust on cowpea leaves. Bottom -- Bruchid on stored bean. Top -- Beans cooking at home site. Right -- Harvested cowpeas in pods. L TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........... .............. .... I ORGANIZATION OF THE BEAN/COWPEA CRSP . ... 4 PROJECT ANNU/, REPORTS: FY 83 . ..... 9 Botswana . .. 11 Brazil (Boyce Thompson Institute) . 18 Brazil (University of Wisconsin/Bliss) . 25 Brazil (University of Wisconsin/Hagedorn) . 33 Cameroon .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 39 Dominican Republic (liversity of Nebraska) . 45 Dominican Republic (University of Puerto Rico) . 52 Ecuador . .*. 57 Guatemala . 65 Honduras . 72 INCAP . 77 Kenya . 86 Malawi . 91 Mexico . 100 Nigeria (Michigan State University) . .. .. 109 Nigeria (University of Georgia) . 112 Senegal .. .... .......... 120 Tanzania . 130 TABLE OF ACRONYMS . 139 C INTRODUCTION The Bean/Cowpea CRSP is a program of coordinated projects in Africa and Latin America addressing hunger ano malnutrition through research on the production and utilization of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) and cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata). The goal of the Bean/Cowpea CRSP reflects the mission of the Title XII "Famine Prevention and Freedom from Hunger Act" of the US Foreign Assistance Act under which the program is funded.
    [Show full text]
  • Jechnical Basis for the Production Ofgroundnutseeds
    • • e s 0 Jechnical basis for the production ofgroundnutseeds 2 3 4 Document prepared by: A. Mayeux1, A. Dasylva , F. Massaly , M. Baldé , 5 B. Ntare , M. Giner6 1. Cirad/GGP, BP 6478, Dakar-Etoile, Sénégal. 2. ISRNUPSE, BP 53, CNRA Bambey, Sénégal. 3. USAID/Peace Corps, BP 2534, Dakar, Sénégal. 4. ISRNUPSE, BP 53 Cnra Bambey, Sénégal. 5. ICRISAT/GGP, BP 320, Bamako, Ma li. 6. Cirad-Ca • 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France Guidelines for groundnut seed production, storage and distribution for traditional farming systems c 0 Introduction ·- ne of the most efficient means for the African farmèr to improve the productivity of his/her farm is by the use of high quality groundnut seed. Organizing high quality seed production 0 and distribution is critical to the implementation of any development plan. This precondition also applies to other factors that affect productivity. Pod and grain size of a specific variety is an important parameter for determining seed value. The crop should be grown under appropriate conditions of climate and soil fertility to ensure good pod formation , filling, and seed maturity. Cultivation techniques müst be perfectly mastered in order for the plant to attain its full potential and ensure quality production. These standards are fundamental for producers who want to sign up for a national multiplication program. The farmer must also accept controls and conform to production certification standards (session 3). Cil "O Q) Q) Seed physiology Cil ....... ::i Planting non-viable seeds that cannot germinate and therefore ensure a good harvest, is the c farmer's greatest risk. Determining seed crop value is the L!ltimate objective of any .analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5. Cowpea (Vigna Unguiculata)
    5. COWPEA (VIGNA UNGUICULATA) – 211 Chapter 5. Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) This chapter deals with the biology of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). It contains information for use during the risk/safety regulatory assessment of genetically engineered varieties intended to be grown in the environment (biosafety). It includes elements of taxonomy, centres of origin and distribution, crop production and cultivation practices, morphological characters, reproductive biology, genetics and genome mapping, species/subspecies hybridisation and introgression, interactions with other organisms, human health considerations, common pests and pathogens, and biotechnological developments. This chapter was prepared by the OECD Working Group on the Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology, with Australia as the lead country. It was initially issued in December 2015. Updates have been made to the production data from FAOSTAT. SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF TRANSGENIC ORGANISMS IN THE ENVIRONMENT: OECD CONSENSUS DOCUMENTS, VOLUME 6 © OECD 2016 212 – 5. COWPEA (VIGNA UNGUICULATA) Introduction Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) is grown in tropical Africa, Asia, North and South America mostly as a grain, but also as a vegetable and fodder crop. It is favoured because of its wide adaptation and tolerance to several stresses. It is an important food source and is estimated to be the major protein source for more than 200 million people in sub-Saharan Africa and is in the top ten fresh vegetables in the People’s Republic of China (hereafter “China”). In the English-speaking parts of Africa it is known as cowpea whereas in the Francophone regions of Africa, the name “niébé” is most often used. Local names for cowpea also include “seub” and “niao” in Senegal, “wake” or “bean” in Nigeria, and “luba hilu” in the Sudan.
    [Show full text]
  • Interactive Effects of Growth Retardants in the Production of Cowpea (Vigna Unguiculata) in Niger Biological
    International Journal of Hydrology Research Article Open Access Interactive effects of growth retardants in the production of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) in Niger biological Abstract Volume 3 Issue 1 - 2019 This food competition between man and insects as race against up each part in a context Moussa Maazou,1 Moussa Maazou,2 Ibrahim where the first makes the feat on the last. strategies are to retard the growth of cowpea by 2 2 performing removal interactive effects Raw old leaves, flowers, young pods and green pods Baoua, Issoufou Hassane 1National Institute for Agricultural Research of Niger (INRAN), between 20-40% respectively at the stage of branching, flowering and post-flowering. Thus Niger the experimental device is a split-split plot with 4 factors not the same order of importance 2University Dan Dan Dicko Koulodo Maradi (UDDD/Maradi), in terms of food. The setting up of absolute witness is biased because migration of the insect Niger complex, uncontrolled variation source and makes it difficult to analyze the results.1,2 Moussa Maazou, Faculty of Agriculture and After twenty observations conducted on this test, the entomological challenge knows a Correspondence: Environmental Sciences, University Dan Dan Dicko koulodode partial solution with technologies for saving 0% infestation of major pests observed in 93% Maradi, Department Productions Plant Science and Technology, of the plots and the population of these insects was kept below the threshold severity in Niger, Email other plots on which few unmated individuals were observed and killed. a. A recontamination of the plots was observed following trivial movements of bugs from Received: January 09, 2019 | Published: January 24, 2019 neighboring plots andgrass near the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Screening Techniques for Host Plant Resistance To
    SCREENINGTECHNIQUES FOR HOST PLANT RESISTANCETO COWPEAINSECT PESTS1 L.E.N.Jackai and S.R. Singh2 Abstract: As research on food crops inlensifiesin the tropics, the spotlightis being increasingly focused on the developmentof varietieswith resistanceto pests and diseases. Much of lhe time, mon€y and patience needed to conduct research on host plant resistance(HpR) is spent on the developmentof methodologiesthat are eventuallyused to screengermplasm and breedinglines. The productsof this screeningprovide the buildingblocks for the developmentof resistantvarieties. Methodologiesdiffer from one place to anotherand from one crop to the other,and are usually tailored to suit local and/or individual circumstances. There is, however, a need to develop standardiz€dmethodology to make comparisonsacross locationseasier. Any methodologyis capable of improvement,but improvementscome only aflsr use and evaluation. In this pap€r we try to defin€the currsntstatus of HPR screeningmethodology in cowpeaentomology, concentrating mainly on techniques developedand used with considerablesuccess at llTA. In addition,the shortcomingsof some of these techniquesare pointedout and areasneeding improvement indicated. An important component of crop 2. Non-preference when he plant improvementprograms the world over is possessesattributes that ad to the the development of pest resistant crop non-useor reduceduse o' ne plant by varieties. The ability of a plant to resist the insect for food, shelt , oviposilion attackby anotherorganism is knownas host or any combinationof ,1€s€. This plant resislance(HPR). The original modality has been r€ hristened by definitionof HPR (Painrer1951) is the Kogan and Ortman (1978) as "relative "antixenosis" "bad amounl of heritable plant meaning host" to qualitiesthat influencethe ultimatedegree reflect a characteristicof the plant, as of damage sufferedby the planl" under a in other modalities, rather than a known/giveninsect pest population.
    [Show full text]
  • L'arachide Au Senegal
    ISRA-CNRA Bambey em Phytotechnie Arachide Note de synthèse sur l’infestation de vers blancs de 1998 José Martin, agronome Cirad Résumé Dans les environs de Gapakh (région de Kaolack), les cultures d’arachide ont été sinistrées en 1998 : faibles densités, plants chétifs et chlorotiques, racines dénudées, récoltes en gausses et fanes très faibles, voire nulles dans certains champs. D’après les anciens, cette situation est sans précédent. Ce désastre est dû à une pullulation également sans précédent de larves de hannetons qui se nourrissent de racines, nodules, gousses et graines. Il s’agit selon toute vraisemblance de Schizonycha aficana, mais à l’instar de la plupart des hannetons ennemis de l’arachide, notamment en Afrique, sa biologie et son écologie sont mal connues. Cette pullulation pourrait être fortuite, avec une probabilité de récidive très faible, ou bien pourrait révéler un changement de statut du ravageur, impliquant des risques importants de réinfestation et d’extension géographique pour les années suivantes, Il convient donc, sans être alarmiste, de rester extrêmement vigilant, car la pullulation de cette année pourrait provenir d’une augmentation progressive de la pression de ce ravageur dans le sud du bassin arachidier, passée jusqu’ici inaperçue. Les problèmes de mortalité de l’arachide qui semblent en augmentation dans le Sud-Bassin-Arachidier au cours de la première moitié du cycle ne sont-ils pas imputables, en partie, directement ou indirectement (attaques fongiques sur lésions racinaires) à une pression accrue des vers blancs ? En Inde et en Afrique Australe, les vers blancs ne sont reconnus parmi les ravageurs principaux de l’arachide que depuis moins de 10 ans.
    [Show full text]
  • PDABC748.Pdf
    f)ROJECT' HP 1:R -UPPORI 1("~l L l 8l PURODLIPOON (~~~~~~::.! ? ......... Amoin L; 20,000, 00 Subir:i 1 l.oki l.o A rE/W NoerNEX' 8 6. ANNE'XES ANNEX A PID APPROVAL CABLE -ACT1 I32INl ctI RIG f' RTTADS' 4O' e .M ZliRjU UU UU ! ZZHC . P231755Z APRI6 C~G AI 'F4 rSECjSTATZ, WASllDC, rq0 DtIbSfAI'M RfIORhI~r 7,,L43. UNGLAS-- SiCITION -(),01 7- -- T 25 AIDAOQ 1Z.0 . 1 23 5 6 :, N/A SUBJECT: SE N-GAL AG PRODUCTION SUPPORT 535-2259 1. ZC PRA PROV7E DTH s P ID E0R TaY SUzJEC"T, PF.OjZ'T ON .ARIL 11 19 S AND, DI F CT; T T TTK PP B3'SU 1'1T .,,"0T 0.- A D1110,'TONFO S F1,1:1.,??PROVAL.T:H TEtS S ON CANBE E CGiIMI tD"OK TEE SIGN 1IICARK MR~ET IN T43, EID DOCUMZ ,T OVER 'IHE 2ARL 17I( RES lGj L*iU~ R A'~ STILL i&. qU! 'T1ON SC OIcRN';IN3CN TH z17Ar S~cC4 T0 ~At iD ,TH7-CRE DIT CONPOWL-TS, TEE EC'?l E'~OLYSUPO -$i~~SIC CONCEPT. OF E PRzOJCT ' -' 0 LLOW IM, GCU IDANC Z WAS D-LVi;LO0P -S 3Y T EE ECFE AND THE F OJZCT C ASAC~ITE DIREC7TTD BY T E :C?R, TOR IN'CLUJI)N Ii TH'S' '~FPO I AGRCULTRAL ~rleg Cc ; iOflUCTI ON iN SEt'i'GAL AND TEE C0,1?LK IT 3? D7 11EL~W 1.N Ki- W PRI1AT2 S'ECTOR CAPAEI-LILI -S , THE E?;RE7 ,A.,CO.ND LEC T ;AT ,E1A IL TD ~'AF7 31IIL I Y ANAL "S;'- 3Z 0."1?L T D ?R 10 TO S ' JulGAlT 1N N:DS,.
    [Show full text]
  • Pesticide Evaluation Report & Safer Use Action Plan
    PESTICIDE EVALUATION REPORT & SAFER USE ACTION PLAN (PERSUAP) USAID/SENEGAL ECONOMIC GROWTH AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES July 2016 This document has been developed by The Cadmus Group, Inc. under the GEMS II contract (award number AID-OAA-M-13- 00018) for USAID review. Until and unless this document is approved under the processes established by 22 CFR 216, it may not represent the views of USAID or the United States Government. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY USAID/SENEGAL AGRICULTURAL PORTFOLIO Senegal is one of the countries where the USAID Feed the Future (FtF) program is being implemented. FtF is a Multi-Year Strategy that outlines the five-year strategic plan for the U.S. Government’s global hunger and food security initiative. FtF program activities under USAID/Senegal’s Development Objective (DO) 1, “Increased, Inclusive Economic Growth.” contribute to USAID/Senegal’s goal to increase the agriculture sector’s contribution to economic growth through an inclusive, private sector-led value chain approach. Specifically, USAID/Senegal’s primary FtF goal is to establish formal agriculture production and market systems in three selected value chains: rice, maize and millet. USAID funded nutrition programs in Senegal focus on other crops including cereals, legumes, tubers, green leafy vegetables, vegetables, fruit and also on livestock. PEST MANAGEMENT NEEDS OF USAID/SENEGAL DO1 AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES Effective pest management is required to achieve intended development outcomes in these USAID/Senegal agricultural activities. Even in the context of USAID’s policy commitment to integrated pest management (IPM), effective pest management often requires the use of products defined as pesticides by the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).
    [Show full text]
  • Inventaire Et Importance Des Insectes Ravageurs Du Mil, Pennisetum Glaucum (Leek) R
    BURKINA FASO UNITE-PROGRES-JUSTICE MINISTERE DES ENSEIGNEMENTS SECONDAIRE, SUPERIEUR ET DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE UNIVERSITE POLYTECHNIQUE DE BOBO-DIOULASSO INSTITUT DU DEVELOPPEMENT RURAL MEMOIRE DE FIN DE CYCLE en vue de l'obtention du DIPLOME D'INGENIEUR DU DEVELOPPEMENT RURAL OPTION: AGRONOMIE THEME: INVENTAIRE ET IMPORTANCE DES INSECTES RAVAGEURS DU MIL, PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (LEEK) R. Br. EN ZONE SAHELIENNE DU BURKINA FASO Présenté par: DABRE Elisée Emmanuel Maître de stage: Pro Clémentine DABIREIBINSO Directeur de mémoire: Pro Idrissa O. DICKO JUIN 2008 N°:...-200S/(AGRO) DEDICACE .:. }l Ca mémoire ciefeue mamère, Lengam Setto et à Ca mémoire de feu mon petitfrère, (])a6ré jlcliift:e; •••• }l mon pere;, .:. }l toutemafamiûe TABLE DES MATIERES DEDICACE i REMERCIEMENTS v LISTE DES SIGLES ET ABREVIATIONS vi LISTE DES TABLEAUX vii LISTE DES FIGURES viii LISTE DES CARTES ET DES PHOTOS viii RESUME ix INTRODUCTION GENERALE 1 PREMIERE PARTIE: GENERALITES 3 CHAPITRE 1. Le milieu d'étude 3 1.1. Milieu physique 3 1.1.1. La situation de la zone d'étude 3 1.1.2. Le Climat. 4 1.1.2.1. La pluviométrie et les températures 5 1.1.2.2. Les vents 6 1.1.2.3. Evapotranspiration 6 1.1.2.4. L'humidité relative 7 1.1.3. Le reliefet les sols 7 1.1.4. L'hydrographie 8 1.1.5. La végétation 8 CHAPITRE 2. Le mil, Pennisetum glaucum (Leek) R.Br 9 2.1. Systématique, origine, aires de culture et production 9 2.1.1. Systématique 9 2.1.2. Origine, aires de culture et production 9 2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Smic Document
    SMIC DOCUMENT SORGHUM AND MILLETS INFORMATION CENTER international Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics lCR ISAT Patancheru P.O. Andhra Pradesh, India 502 324 BIOLOGICAL CO-ROL OF PESTS: ITS POTEmZAL IN WEST AJ?RI_CA Proceedinpof International Conference held in Dakar, SGnggal, February 9-13, 1981 USAID -GIONAL FOOD CROP PROTECTION PROJECT 625-0928 PHASE I1 B-P, 49 Dakar, SGniEgal International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Cooperative Programme in Senegal, CNRA, B.P. 51, Bnmbey Abstrcct Present situation of insect pests of sorghum and pearl millet in Weet Africa is summarized. Notes on distribution and host range of parasites, predators and pathogens are presented and the scope of biological control is discussed. Among parasites reported from West Africa : Apanteles seskae Cam., Tetrnstichus atriclavus Wts., Pediobius furvus Gah., HyperchdLcidin soudanensis Stef., Sturmiop~parasiticn Cur. are major parasites of stem- borers and Tetrastichus diplosidis Cravf. and Eupelmus RO_E Gir. are of grain midges. Ants, coccinellids, syrphids and bugs may prove useful as potentid. predators. Surveys and further studies on insect pests and natural erlemieo are suggested. I - Introduction In West Africa, sorghum (Sorhum bicolor (L.) Wench) and pearl millet (~enniseturntyphoides Stapf. & Hubb.) are the major food crops occupying an area of about 17 million hectares. These crops are damaged by a range of insect pests. Efforts have been made to evolve auitable control strategies in order to reduce the pest populations and thua the crop losses; viz. stem- borers (~arris,1962) ; grain midges (Harris, 1961 ; Coutin, 1970 a,b) ; millet earhead caterpillars (Vercambre , 1978) end shootfly (~desiyun, 1978 ) .
    [Show full text]
  • International Pearl Millet Workshop
    Cover: Ex-Bornu, an important landracc population from the Bornu region of northeast Nigeria, which is extensively used as parental material in breeding programs in India. Proceedings of the International Pearl Millet Workshop 7-11 April 1986 ICRISAT Center, India Sponsored by USAID Title XII Collaborative Research Support Program on Sorghum and Pearl Millet (INTSORMIL) and International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) ICRISAT International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh 502 324, India 1987 Correct citation: ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics). 1987. Proceedings of the International Pearl Millet Workshop, 7-11 April 1986, ICRISAT Center, India. Patancheru, A.P. 502 324, India: ICRISAT. Scientific Editor J.R. Witcombe Publication Editor Seth R. Beckerman ISBN 92-9066-134-8 The International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics is a nonprofit scientific educational institute receiving support from donors through the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research. Donors to ICRISAT include governments and agencies of Australia, Belgium, Canada, Federal Republic of Germany, Finland, France, India, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, People's Republic of China, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States of America, and the following international and private organizations: Asian Development Bank, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), Global 2000 Inc., International Development Research Centre, International Fertilizer Development Center, International Fund for Agricultural Development, The European Economic Community, The Ford Foundation, The Leverhulme Trust, The Opec Fund for International Development, The Rocke- feller Foundation, The World Bank, United Nations Development Programme, and the University of Hohenheim.
    [Show full text]
  • Pnaar229.Pdf
    (xl *1I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF PESTS: ITS POTENTIAL IN WEST AFRICA Proceeding of an International Conference held in Dakar, S~n6gal, February 9-13, 1981 USAID REGIONAL FOOD CROP PROTECTION PROJECT 625-0928 PHASE II B.P. 49 Dakar, S~nigal 1 CONTENTS Acknowledgements v Preface C. Castleton (USDA/USAID) vi PART 1: INTRODUCTION " An outline of Biological Methods to Control Crop and Farm Produce Pests" G. Pierrard (FAO) 1. PART II. INTERNATIONAL SCOPE OF BIOCONTROL " A brief review of Biological Control in the United States Department of Agriculture" John J. Drea, Jr. (USDA) 20. "Biological Control at C.E.R.D.A.T." J. Breni~re (GERDAT) 27. "GTZ Plant and Post-Harvest Protection Projects, Worldwide" Carlos Kelin-Koch and Ludwig Luchtrach (GTZ) 42. "The International Organization of Biological Control (IOBC) A.L. MBIELE (OAU) 46. "CAB's Biological Control Service to World Ariculture" Fred D. BENNETT (CIBC) 56 "Biological Control of Insect Pests of Sorghum rnd Pearl Millet in West Africa" R.T. Gahukar (ICRISAT) 69. "Crrent Biological Control Research at IITA, with special Emphasis on the Cassava Mealybug (Phenacoccus manihoti Mat-Fer) Hans R. Herren (IITA) 92. "The Role of Biological Control in the organization and Implementation of the CILSS Integrated Pest Management Project" Jean Tetefort (FAO) 99. PART III. TOPICS OF INTEREST TO SAHELIAN AGRICULTURE "Stem-borers of Cereals in Sahelian West Africa: Relative Importance and Control" K.F.NUANZE (ICRISAT) 115. "Slowing Preimago development of Ephestia Kuehntelle Zell.(Lepi Pyralidae)" J. VOEGELE et al. (GERDAT) 124. "The use of Insect Pathogens in Integrated Pest Management" Jerry FOWLER (USDA/USAID) 136.
    [Show full text]