A64 Brambling Fields Interchange Community Involvement Report May 2011

[Type text]

Status of Document Work in Preliminary Released for Final Issue Progress Comments WIP PRE RFC FIN X

Distribution:

Document to support Planning th A Karen Sanderson Adrian Kemp Ian Smith 6 May 2011 Application Revision Remarks Prepared by Checked by Authorised by Date

Identification Number & Revision Index

Contract Doc Type Issuer Location Discipline Sequence Revision A 6 4 R E P C I V S 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 A

A64 Brambling Fields Interchange – Community Involvement Report

QM WSP Revision Description of the change(s) - Comments Date of Issue Date of No. Reply A Document to support Planning Application 6th May 2011

A64/REP/CIV/S00/0100/0002/A A64 Brambling Fields Interchange – Community Involvement Report

Contents

!"# $ % ! " & ' ( $)

A64/REP/CIV/S00/0100/0002/A A64 Brambling Fields Interchange – Community Involvement Report

1 Introduction

* +&+,(-%+.&/(

1.1.1 This document summarises the community involvement and consultation that has been undertaken regarding the proposed A64 Brambling Fields Interchange Improvement. It supports the Planning Application being put forward by North Yorkshire County Council to develop the existing junction by providing an all- movements Interchange.

* (-&-&.&

The Existing Situation: 1.2.1 Brambling Fields is an Interchange situated north east of Malton at the junction of the A64(T) and the B1248 Scarborough Road. The A64(T) is a 2 lane dual carriageway with no hardshoulder and the B1248 is a two way single carriageway road. 1.2.2 The existing Interchange does not cater for all movements. It is possible to join the A64(T) and travel eastbound or westbound, however it is only possible to exit the A64(T) whilst travelling westbound. 1.2.3 The scheme has previously been identified as a transport priority within the Ryedale Area, and is supported by the Malton and Norton Traffic Management Strategy. The proposal will not only enhance local accessibility but will contribute to the economic ambitions of the area as well supporting local housing and employment growth. The Proposal: 1.2.4 It is proposed to convert the existing Interchange into a dumb-bell type grade separated junction that caters for all movements. This provides an alternative route for A64 eastbound traffic travelling to Norton as well as those travelling from Malton to Norton. The centre of Malton currently experiences congestion and heavy goods vehicles (HGVs) find it difficult to make the left turn from the Pickering Road junction onto the B1257 in the centre of Malton, or to pass through the congested centres of Malton and Norton. The congestion within the centre of Malton has resulted in elevated concentrations of nitrogen dioxide which have exceeded the UK’s Air Quality objectives which has resulted in it being designated an Air Quality Management Area (AQMA). 1.2.5 It is anticipated that the re-routeing of traffic will improve air quality at Butcher Corner and as a consequence of the scheme there will be a positive impact on the performance of the local transport system due to reduced demand caused by the reassignment of traffic. Traffic using this alternative route would avoid the railway level crossing and Butcher’s Corner, two locations where congestion is currently an issue. An evaluation of this impact has been undertaken in the form of a transport assessment that will be provided in support of the Planning Application. 1.2.6 This work involves the construction of a new eastbound diverge slip road, two roundabouts and tie ins to the existing slip roads. The existing bridge over the A64(T) will remain, however the carriageway will be widened to allow two way traffic over it. 1.2.7 The proposal will require significant earthworks, pavement and drainage works associated with the realignment of the B1248 and A64 slip roads. The mainline A64 trunk road will not be affected by the works other than the provision of new signs to inform motorists of the new slip road facility. 1.2.8 A copy of the scheme plan (as recently displayed at the public exhibition in March 2011) is shown at Appendix A.

A64/REP/CIV/S00/0100/0002/A 1 A64 Brambling Fields Interchange – Community Involvement Report

2 Public Consultation Undertaken

* 0&%!& !/1(-&0&%!&!+!%&2&!+ .&/(,.&3+456%,( +&((&70 88

2.1.1 A Draft Core Strategy was published by Ryedale District Council for consultation in summer 2010. This document is the strategic part of the Council's Local Development Framework (LDF) known as the Ryedale Plan and sets out broadly where new homes, jobs and shops will be provided, together with the required services and facilities to support them. The draft Core Strategy builds on previous consultation carried out particularly that in the summer of 2009 (Paragraph 2.2 below). In particular it sets out the local authorities detailed policy approach on areas such as housing, economy, community facilities and infrastructure, the environment and development management. 2.1.2 Within the draft Core Strategy (Paragraph 3.17) it was recognised that the highway authority, North Yorkshire County Council, had identified a range of strategic transport improvements to reduce traffic congestion within Malton and Norton one of which included improvements to the Brambling Fields Interchange. It was stated that the development identified in the Ryedale Plan could be accommodated by improvements at the existing junction with a package of associated traffic management measures and improvements on the local highway network. 2.1.3 The draft Core Strategy (Paragraph 3.18) made clear that the Brambling Fields Improvement would be fully funded by developers. Ryedale District Council has been collecting developer contributions from major development towards the Brambling Fields improvement since 2007 and will continue to do so through the Local Development Framework (LDF) by means of a community infrastructure levy (CIL) tariff. However, as the improvement is an essential element of the delivery of the LDF strategy North Yorkshire County Council and Ryedale District Council have agreed to front fund the scheme to ensure timely delivery and support the growth envisaged in the Ryedale District Council’s Core Strategy. It is understood that this money will be ‘clawed back’, from developer contributions over time. 2.1.4 The draft Core Strategy recognised the importance of the Brambling Fields Improvement to support delivery of Ryedale District Council’s Spatial Strategy.

* 0&%!&!+!%&2&!+ .&/(,.&3+41!%,5 889

2.2.1 Between 15 June and 7 August 2009 the Council consulted the general public on issues and options for managing development and planning for new development in Ryedale. 2.2.2 The 2009 consultation process brought issues forward from the previous Draft Core Strategy, including consulting on issues raised by the Inspector, updating and checking on different options and setting out and re-publishing the proposed spatial hierarchy which would underpin the new Draft Core Strategy. 2.2.3 Improvements for the A64 Brambling Fields Interchange were not specifically mentioned in the consultation document. However the information boards displayed at exhibitions alongside the consultation document made reference to Brambling Fields.

* .!(+//%/+(+/(,,./7&.&/(((&70

2.3.1 North Yorkshire County Council has in recent years carried out studies of the major market towns in North Yorkshire examining the transportation arrangements, identifying traffic related problems and drawing up a preferred strategy based upon public consultation. For Malton and Norton the lack of full turning movements at both the Brambling Fields and Musley Bank A64 Junctions has long been identified as a key issue in improving the transport arrangements of the two towns. The public consultation response from the Traffic Management Strategy strongly supported improvements to these junctions. The Malton and Norton

A64/REP/CIV/S00/0100/0002/A 2 A64 Brambling Fields Interchange – Community Involvement Report

Strategy was completed in 2005 with a recommendation that work continue on securing the necessary funding and agreements for these strategic highway improvements to be delivered.

* 0&%!&!+!%&2&!+ .&/(,.&3+4N+&((&70 886 88;

2.4.1 An earlier version of the Core Strategy (produced from 2004-2007) was found to be ‘unsound’ by the Planning Inspectorate in 2007. 2.4.2 In the Submission draft Core Strategy (2005) the action and implementation table for draft policy CP6 stated that in order to promote an effective transport system and public transport network, the Local Development Framework will: ii) Achieve improved access onto the A64, primarily through improved junctions at Scarborough Road, Norton and York Road, Malton. 2.4.3 The Spatial Strategy topic paper for the Examination lists the limited accessibility of traffic movements to/from the A64 in certain directions as affecting the Spatial Strategy. Work undertaken by North Yorkshire County Council has identified that the junctions within the centre of Malton / Norton, principally Butcher Corner, are at or near capacity, restricting the amount of new development that can be accommodated within the towns. Several highway infrastructure schemes have been identified in a transportation study covering Malton/Norton, which, if constructed, would release significant highway capacity within the two towns. These include upgrading the western and eastern junctions onto the A64(T) at Brambling Fields.

*< &2&&/(&(/ +((+/((&70

2.5.1 The Local Transport Plan 2006 – 2011 (LTP) which was adopted by the County Council on the 15 th February 2006 included the preparation of Service Centre Transportation Strategies (SCTS). These Strategies are a development of the successful Traffic Management Strategies (TMS), which included one undertaken for Malton and Norton. The SCTS differed from the TMS in that they covered a much larger area, including the surrounding hinterland from where residents would travel to the service centre to access services. 2.5.2 As part of the normal SSCTS process a public consultation is undertaken to gauge the opinion of those who live and work within the strategy area regarding the proposals being put forward. This gives local people the opportunity to highlight issues which may not have been identified in the design process. 2.5.3 Following recent budget cuts the consultations have normally been conducted through local County Councillors. However as the Malton and Norton SCTS consultation was to include the Brambling Fields Interchange Improvement and Ryedale District Council’s Public Realm proposals it was decided that a broader consultation should be undertaken. 2.5.4 The consultation was launched on the 18 th March 2011 with an exhibition staged over two days in the Green Man Public House in Malton Market Place. Residents and those from the local business community within the area were invited to talk to officers of North Yorkshire County Council, Ryedale District Council, the Highways Agency and their consultants WSP. Leaflets and response questionnaires were made available at the exhibition and afterwards in libraries, council offices; responses could also be made online through the County Council’s website. The consultation process closed on 18th April 2011. 2.5.5 A copy of the leaflet and questionnaire is at Appendix B. 2.5.6 Mention of the consultation was also made in the local press. A press clipping is included at Appendix C. 2.5.7 A list of stakeholders consulted on the proposals is listed in Appendix D

A64/REP/CIV/S00/0100/0002/A 3 A64 Brambling Fields Interchange – Community Involvement Report

3 Response to Public Consultation

* 0&%!& !/1!+!%&2&!+ .&/(,.&3+456%,(+& ((&70..& 88

3.1.1 Feedback from the consultation on this document as detailed in Paragraph 2.1.1 above, which closed in November 2010, is not yet available. The Councils responses to the comments made will be reported within the next stage of the consultation process i.e. the publication of the draft Core Strategy which is due to be reported to Ryedale Members in June 2011.

* 0&%!&!+!%&2&!+ .&/(,.&3+41!%,5 889

3.2.1 Although improvement of the A64 Brambling Fields Interchange was not specifically mentioned within the consultation document discussed in Paragraph 2.2 above, although it was highlighted on the exhibition boards and these were available alongside the consultation document. The need for improvements to be provided at the Interchange was recognised and raised numerous comments by the public. In particular the need to remove heavy goods vehicles from the town centre which an all movements Interchange at Brambling Fields as proposed would facilitate. However there was also support for preferred alternatives e.g. a link road from the Westfield Way link to the A64/A169 Interchange.

* 0&%!&!+!%&2&!+ .&/(,.&3+4N+&((&70 886 88;

3.3.1 There were no specific comments made with respect to the junctions on the A64 as part of the consultation process discussed in Paragraph 2.4 above, although comments were made with respect to the dualling and operation of the A64. 3.3.2 The Consultation statement (Regulation 31 Statement) for the Core Strategy lists comments made to support the Core Strategy with respect to references made to reflect the adopted Traffic Management Strategies for the Market Towns and the emerging Local Transport Plan.

* &2&&/(&(/ +((+/((&70

3.4.1 In all 160 responses were received as part of the consultation process identified within Paragraph 2.5 above and of those 127 (over 79%) indicated their support for the Improvement to the Brambling Fields Interchange. Only 19 respondents disagreed with the scheme and 14 gave no view. Various tables showing the responses received is provided in Appendix E. 3.4.2 The main reasons given by those who opposed the scheme were: (i) Preferred alternatives: • Preference for an extra road to the south of Malton linking to Beverley Road. • Provision of a roundabout on the A64(T) instead of the interchange proposed • Improvements to the other A64(T) junctions around Malton

(ii) Concerns from residents living at Brambling Fields: • Disruption during construction • Visual impact due to loss of vegetation and new street lighting • Additional traffic noise

A64/REP/CIV/S00/0100/0002/A 4 A64 Brambling Fields Interchange – Community Involvement Report

*< & +/&(++/&/

3.5.1 Whilst other major highway improvements were identified in the Malton and Norton TMS, subsequent traffic modelling has shown the scheme at Brambling Fields could deliver the reduction in traffic flows through the town centre that would address the existing air quality problem. It is also the least costly of the possible strategic highway improvements that were identified in the TMS. Whilst the scheme at Brambling Fields has been given priority to date, to facilitate further growth of Malton and Norton it is possible additional strategic highway improvement schemes will be required in future years. 3.5.2 The Highways Agency, who are highway authority for the A64 have no plans to upgrade or improve the A64 or its junctions in the area. In particular, provision of an at grade roundabout on the A64 would be against current policy to maintain a safe and free flowing strategic network for long distance traffic. 3.5.3 The A64 Brambling Fields improvement is supported by Ryedale District Council, North Yorkshire County Council (as local highways authority) and the Highways Agency. 3.5.4 The scheme design has given consideration to all the environmental impacts including visual, noise and ecological. Full details are available in the Environmental Statement that accompanies the Panning Application. 3.5.5 Although some disruption is inevitable during construction this will be minimised by strict contractual conditions imposed on the works contractor and liaison with the local authority’s Environmental Health Officer and other statutory authorities. 3.5.6 Planting and other mitigation works will be incorporated in to the proposed works to minimise environmental impact in the longer term.

A64/REP/CIV/S00/0100/0002/A 5 A64 Brambling Fields Interchange – Community Involvement Report

4 Conclusions

* +/!+/

4.1.1 Since 2009 there has been public awareness of the intention to improve the A64 Brambling Fields Interchange. 4.1.2 This has been achieved through publication of the Ryedale Local Development Framework in 2009 and 2010 and the Service Centre Transportation Strategy in 2011. 4.1.3 There has been consistent overall support for the scheme. The most recent consultation, which included more detailed design information, showing the proposed alignment, lighting and non-motorised user provisions, also received an overwhelming positive response. 4.1.4 Concerns expressed by the public, where possible, have been addressed through the scheme design and are explained in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Planning Application.

A64/REP/CIV/S00/0100/0002/A 6 A64 Brambling Fields Interchange – Community Involvement Report

Appendices, Figures & Tables

M1MM/REP/---/---/----/----/A1 A64 Brambling Fields Interchange – Community Involvement Report

Appendix A Scheme Plan

A64/REP/A64/ REP/CIV/S00/0100/0002/A

A64 Brambling Fields Interchange – Community Involvement Report

Appendix B Consultation Leaflet and Questionnaire

A64/REP/A64/ REP/CIV/S00/0100/0002/A Malton & Norton Highway Improvements

Consultation Questionnaire – March 2011

www.northyorks.gov.uk/maltonandnortontransport

The Ordnance Survey mapping shown in this publication is provided by North Yorkshire County Council under license from the Ordnance Survey in order to fulfil its public function to publicise local public services. 1. Background MALTON AND NORTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS North Yorkshire County Council (NYCC), Each proposal in this leaflet has a location Ryedale District Council (RDC) and the map and a brief description of the scheme. Highways Agency (HA) are proposing a number of improvements to the highway The major scheme being proposed is the network in and around the twin towns of provision of an additional slip road at the Malton and Norton. Brambling Fields junction at the eastern end of the A64 Malton Bypass, the majority of Details of the proposals being promoted by proposals for the centres of Malton and each of the partner authorities are set out in Norton seek to build on the decrease in the this leaflet. volume of traffic passing through the towns Section 2 (pages 3 to 12, in green ) describes that this will deliver. In addition to the main a number of schemes (A to M) being benefit of reducing through traffic and considered for inclusion by NYCC in its therefore improving the air quality in the Service Centre Transportation Strategy for vicinity of Butcher Corner, these Malton and Norton, subject to funding. complementary schemes will provide (NYCC funding of £150k.) improved conditions for shoppers and pedestrians. Other schemes included in this Section 3 (pages 13 to 20, in blue ) describes leaflet have been identified following various a major improvement scheme for the A64 discussions with local stakeholders, and your Malton Bypass at the Brambling Fields views are also being sought on these now. junction which has funding allocated by the HA, NYCC and RDC. This section also Each of the partners is keen to find out the describes a complementary scheme, which is views of local residents and businesses to be funded by NYCC, to ensure the new regarding these proposals and that is why slip road at Brambling Fields on the A64 will you have been sent this leaflet and be used to its full potential. questionnaire. NYCC is collating all of the questionnaire responses, and will then Section 4 (pages 21 to 27, in red ) sets out a consult with the HA and RDC before any number of possible improvements to recommendations are made by the highways in Malton which would bring about responsible organisation to implement any environmental and safety improvements for particular scheme. shoppers and pedestrians generally. These are described as ' Public Realm' schemes, Please take a few minutes to read through and are being promoted by Ryedale District the leaflet, complete the questionnaire Council. At present no funding has been indicating your views on each of the allocated and assistance from partners would schemes, and return it in the pre paid be required. envelope which is also enclosed. If you prefer you can respond on-line at www.northyorks.gov.uk/malton&nortontransport .

It is crucial that we obtain your views in order to take the strategy forward. Please complete the online questionnaire.

If you require any further information regarding this strategy, please telephone 0845 872374. 2 Malton & Norton Highways Improvements: Consultation Questionnaire – January 2011

2. NYCC SCTS Schemes and Options

The County Council is in the process of Please note: developing 28 Service Centre Transportation Strategies (SCTS) across North Yorkshire. Improvement schemes and maintenance This SCTS focuses on the needs of Malton, schemes, in the same or similar locations, Norton and nearby settlements. have been identified separately for clarity.

The strategy forms part of the county-wide However, where ever possible schemes Second Local Transport Plan (2006-2011) that are located in the same area will be and aims to address a broad range of delivered together to minimise disruption transport issues. and minimise cost.

This section outlines the schemes which the County Council has put forward to tackle identified transport issues in the SCTS area. These range from improvements to pedestrian facilities to road safety schemes.

Kirkby Mills

Amotherby Foxholes

Malton

Norton Luttons

Buttercrambe

The mapping used in this document is reproduced from Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. 2010. 100017946

3 Malton & Norton A: Improvements to the Finkle Street and Spital Street Junctions on Newbiggin.

It is proposed to introduce a one-way traffic system along Finkle Street and Spital Street which will allow footpaths on both streets to be widened to improve visibility and pedestrian safety.

(Estimated Cost : £20,000) A

Finkle Street Spital Street

This scheme is part of a package of schemes previously identified in the 2005 Malton Transport Management Strategy. The scheme is aimed at improving safety by implementing a 20mph limit, using appropriate signing and lining, in the area identified below.

(Estimated Cost : £45,000) B Wheelgate N

Market Place

Yorkersgate

Castlegate

20mph Zone

4 Malton & Norton Highways Improvements: Consultation Questionnaire – January 2011 Buttercrambe (For information only)

C: Buttercrambe Bridge. Buttercrambe Mill Bridge is being damaged by large vehicles, due to it’s narrow width, which hit the parapet when trying to cross the bridge. The County Council is currently developing a scheme to reduce the vehicle damage to the parapet and the cost of the development and implementation of this proposal will be funded from elsewhere and will not be taken from the allocation for the delivery of the SCTS.

C Buttercrambe Bridge Dolegate

Buttercrambe Mill Bridge

To Stamford N Bridge & A166

5 Amotherby to Kirkby Mills

D: Amotherby to Kirkby Mills Safety Scheme .

This scheme takes the form of a Route Study to assess vehicle speeds and address any issues with speeding traffic on the route. The findings of the study will be used to identify any speed reduction measures that are required and a package of works will be drawn up for delivery. The study costs will be kept to a minimum to maximise funding for safety measures

(Estimated Cost (including works): £75,000)

Kirkby Mills N

Route for Safety Scheme

Amotherby

6 Malton & Norton Highways Improvements: Consultation Questionnaire – January 2011 Luttons to Foxholes

E: Luttons to Foxholes – Speed Reduction Measures .

To improve safety traffic calming measures will be implemented to slow traffic in East Lutton and Helperthorpe.

The traffic calming will comprise of signing and lining and possibly Ripple Print which is a type of road surfacing that creates noise and vibration for motorists when they drive over it but is virtually silent to those outside the vehicle.

(Estimated Cost : £55,000)

E Foxholes

East Lutton

Helperthorpe

West Lutton

7 Showfield Lane Industrial Estate, Malton

F: Footway renewal on the Showfield Lane Industrial Estate

The footways need to be reconstructed as they are being damaged by HCVs and other vehicles parking on them, measures to prevent this happening in future will be taken into account as part of the proposed scheme.

(Estimated Cost : £70,000) F

Showfields Industrial Estate

Langton Road, Norton

G: Resurface The Horsewalk on Langton Road

The existing surface is becoming too slippery for horses in times of wet and winter weather.

(Estimated Cost : £55,000) G

8 Bazeleys Lane, Norton Malton & Norton Highways Improvements: Consultation Questionnaire – January 2011

H: Passing places on Bazeleys Lane, Norton

This is a popular route for local drivers wishing to avoid the centre of Norton which is very narrow in places with poor forward visibility.

(Estimated Cost : £60,000) H N

I: Resurfacing Railway Street, Malton

This is the main artery between the town centre and the bus / railway station. The surface is uneven as a result of several different patches / repairs. Any works undertaken will be coordinated with elements of scheme M.

(Estimated Cost : £66,000) I N

9 Saville Street, Norton

These schemes would not be required if scheme N3 is approved and taken forward

J: Resurfacing Saville Street, Malton

This is a key route between Yorkersgate and the Market Place. The existing surface is showing signs of deterioration with major chipping loss and some potholes.

(Estimated Cost : £36,000)

K: Footway Improvements - Saville Street, Malton

This is the main footpath between the Market Place and the southern part of the town. The existing footpath surface is showing its age and is in need of full reconstruction.

(Estimated Cost : £44,000)

J K

10 Malton & Norton Highways Improvements: Consultation Questionnaire – January 2011

The Luttons to Butterwick

L: Footpath Improvements between The Luttons and Butterwick

This well used footway between the villages has become overgrown and needs the grass and soil removing to restore it to its former width. In addition to this several areas will need resurfacing to remove the most uneven parts.

(Estimated Cost : £37,000)

Extent of proposed footpath works shown in red

11 Page intentionally left blank

12 Malton & Norton Highways Improvements : Consultation Questionnaire – January 2011 3. HA Scheme and NYCC Complementary Measures

M: A64 Brambling Fields Interchange Scheme and NYCC Complimentary Measures

This section provides details of a scheme, on the A64, which will be undertaken by the HA under a funding agreement with NYCC and RDC, together with Complementary Traffic Management Measures within Malton and Norton to improve Air Quality at Butcher Corner Malton .

One of the main traffic related issues in Malton / Norton is the congestion and associated air quality issues in the vicinity of the Butcher Corner signalised junction in Malton. The issue is made worse by traffic queues resulting from the closure of the level crossing on Castlegate to allow trains to cross the road. RDC has declared an Air Quality Management Area in the vicinity of Butcher Corner where the air quality has deteriorated below acceptable levels. The current issues if not addressed will result in further deterioration of air quality, increased congestion and would adversely impact the ability to accommodate new homes, jobs and shops at Malton and Norton, as identified in the Ryedale District Council Local Development Framework.

In order to address the Air Quality issue it is necessary to reduce the traffic volumes passing through Butcher Corner and reduce the number of vehicles queuing in the vicinity of the traffic signals.

The A64 Brambling Fields Grade Separated Junction improvement is designed to provide an alternative route for traffic travelling east bound on the A64 to gain access to Norton avoiding the need to travel through Malton (i.e. Butcher Corner). The Brambling Fields Grade Separated Junction improvement also provides an alternative route for local traffic to travel between Malton and Norton without the need to cross the level crossing and Butcher Corner.

The following section sets out the:

• Proposed improvements to Brambling Fields Grade Separated Junction (Estimated cost : £5.5 million)

• Complementary Measures to improve air quality at Butcher Corner Malton. (Estimated Cost : £100,000)

The proposed A64 Brambling Fields Grade Separated Junction improvement together with the following Complimentary Measures is expected to reduce the volume of traffic passing through the Butcher Corner junction, in Malton, by up to a third.

13 A64 Brambling Fields Interchange Scheme

The A64 Brambling Fields Interchange improvement is a scheme jointly funded by the HA, NYCC and RDC.

Construction of a new eastbound slip road from the A64 will allow traffic from the west to access Norton and the south without having to travel through Malton.

This improvement, along with complementary schemes proposed by NYCC within Malton and Norton, will reduce traffic and improve the environment within the town centres.

The Brambling Fields Improvement is currently at design stage with technical and environmental surveys having been being undertaken. The estimated cost of the scheme is around £5.5m.

Detailed design and environmental assessments are programmed to be completed early in 2011 and a planning application submitted in the Spring.

If approval is granted, construction could then start in late 2011 / early 2012. Construction will take around nine months. Environmental surveys and assessments have been carried out to determine the impact that the proposed junction changes may have.

Tree and ecology surveys have been undertaken. Noise and air quality changes have also been assessed as well as possible effects on heritage and water quality. This work will inform the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process.

An EIA will be completed to support the forthcoming planning application for Brambling Fields.

Appropriate mitigation measures will be incorporated into the design of the scheme to minimise any effects on the environment.

Details of the proposed scheme layout and a location plan are included in pages 15 to 17.

14 Map to show location

A64(T) N A64 Proposed slip road

B1248 Malton & Norton Highways Improvements Highways Norton & Malton Scarborough Road Malton

Brambling Fields

Junction : Consultation Questionnaire – January 2011 January – Questionnaire Consultation

Norton

17 Complementary Measures to improve the Air Quality at Butcher Corner and to improve the environment on Railway Street, Wells Lane and Norton Road. In addition to the Brambling Fields junction improvement the following measures are also required to be made in the town centre to reduce the number of vehicles passing through Butcher Corner, and to reduce the number of vehicles queuing in the immediate vicinity of the junction. The opportunity is also being taken to provide enhanced facilities for pedestrians at this location and to improve the overall environment.

• HGV ban across the level crossing, except for access to Castlegate.

• HGVs will be banned, except for access, from using Railway Street and Norton Road. • The removal of one traffic lane on the Castlegate approach to the traffic signals to reduce the number of vehicles queuing in the immediate vicinity of the junction and the footpath widened. • A change in the signal timings at Butcher Corner to include an additional pedestrian phase.

• Alterations / Improvements to Railway Street, Wells Lane and Norton Road (see page 19)

Butcher Corner Extra pedestrian phase at traffic lights.

Castlegate Removal of traffic lane and improved footway.

Railway Street & Norton Road HGV ban (except for access).

The total estimated cost to implement the above measures is £100,000 At the time of implementing the improvements, to Railway Street, Wells Lane and Norton Road, should additional funding be made available, through other sources, consideration will be given to enhancing the appearance of the improvements by using natural stone materials for elements such as footpaths.

18 Malton & Norton Highways Improvements : Consultation Questionnaire – January 2011 Alterations / Improvements to Railway Street, Wells Lane and Norton Road. This will improve the footways, including those on Railway Street and Wells Lane, and provide an enhanced crossing for pedestrians outside the doctor's surgery. The junction of Railway Street and Wells Lane will also be simplified and a one-way section on Norton Road will be introduced. This route, which links Malton and Norton, will be made more appealing for pedestrians and cyclists, with a dedicated cycle lane and enhancements such as new planting.

Butcher Corner N

Railway Street / Wells Lane Improvements

One-way with bus contra- Bus Station flow on Norton Road – see insert below Buses only

One-way section with bus contra flow on Norton Road. This will introduce a one-way section on Norton road, which will be open to westbound traffic only. The eastbound direction will be open for buses only, this will prevent long distance traffic from rat running southbound on Railway Street and eastbound on Norton Road.

INSERT – Bus Contra-flow Measures

Cyclists

les All Vehic

nly Buses O

Raised Planter

19 Page intentionally left blank

20 Malton & Norton Highways Improvements : Consultation Questionnaire – January 20011 4. Ryedale District Council - Public Realm Schemes and Options Background

In addition to the other proposals detailed in this consultation (where Ryedale DC will work with the County Council to ensure any highway changes complement the historic town centre), Ryedale District Council is keen to improve Malton town centre to make it more attractive for shoppers and visitors, and to support the local economy. Experience elsewhere (including nearby Whitby and Beverley) has shown that investing in better public spaces in town centres often leads to improved shops and more successful towns. When we asked local people in 2008 there was strong support for such improvements in Malton, including a mostly traffic-free section in part of the Market Place. Designers were asked to produce some initial proposals for Malton that would: • Provide a better environment for pedestrians, including a mostly traffic-free area in part of the Market Place for events, activities, and outdoor eating and drinking. The Saturday Market could potentially relocate to the area and so allow car parking on the current site. The Farmer’s Market could also move here. • Provide improved pedestrian routes through Malton to better link the Market Place and town centre car parks. • Ensure central parking for those with limited mobility, and minimise loss of existing parking. • Improve the quality of materials used and so complement the historic town centre. • Make Malton town centre a place where residents and visitors want to spend time and support the local economy. No decision has been made to proceed with any of the changes and we want your views before any decisions are taken. No funding has yet been agreed and there is no certainty that funding can be found – work is only likely to occur if funding becomes available from a number of sources. However, should such funding become available we want to know which changes would have the support of local people.

The initial proposals below need to be refined before any of them happen and they could happen in separate phases. Changes to the Market Place could be made for a trial period so that local people could see the impacts before a final decision is made. To avoid unnecessary costs and disruption we aim to coordinate any street works with other improvements and maintenance. Other enhancements to the town centre spaces and routes may come forward as part of planning proposals to redevelop sites in and around the town centre. Market Place Options

There are two options for providing a mostly traffic-free area in part of the Market Place, with vehicle access maintained to all other parts of the Market Place. Each of these options includes: • Resurfacing existing concrete or tarmac footways with high quality natural stone, and car parking areas with paving blocks to match with the eastern Market Place. • Resurfacing Saville Street and St Michael Street in high quality materials. • Retaining existing high-quality pavings in the eastern Market Place. In each of these two options one of the four sides of the Market Place is closed to general traffic - but access would be retained to the area for emergency vehicles and deliveries, and other vehicles could be allowed during quiet times of the day. The other 3 sides of the Market Place remain open to vehicles and parking. There would be some reduction in the numbers of car parking spaces within the Market Place, although this varies between the options. Additional parking spaces close to the town centre are anticipated to be provided as part of the redevelopment of nearby town centre sites. 21 Market Place Improvements N1 : Market Place Improvements: Option One

A traffic-free section on the northern side of the Market Place. Traffic can enter Market Place from Wheelgate via Finkle Street, flowing around the southern side of the Market Place and exit onto Yorkersgate via a two-way Market Street. There is a raised pedestrian crossing area on the southern side of the Market Place (where only vehicles travelling towards Market Street can pass through). Vehicles from Yorkersgate can access parking near the Church and the Milton Rooms only via Market Street (Estimated Cost : £1,550,000)

N1 Finkle Street H o p p e rs Wheelgate Pedestrianised Area

Car Parks One-way System

Market Place

Church

Saville Raised Crossing Street Area – One Way Only For Vehicles

Milton Market Street Rooms

Yorkersgate

22 Malton & Norton Highways Improvements : Consultation Questionnaire – January 20011 Market Place Improvements - Photomontage

The image below illustrates what the Market Place could look like, with a traffic-free section on the northern side, as outlined in Option N1.

23 Market Place Improvements N2 : Market Place Improvements: Option Two

A traffic-free section of the southern edge of the Market Place. Traffic can enter Market Place from Wheelgate via Finkle Street, to access parking close to Hoppers or to flow along the northern side of the Market Place to access parking close to the Church and Milton Rooms or to exit onto Yorkersgate via a two way Market Street. Vehicles from Yorkersgate can access parking near the Church and the Milton Rooms only via Market Street (Estimated Cost : £1,450,000)

N2 Finkle Street H o p p e rs Wheelgate

Car Parks

Market Place

Church Saville Street

One-way System

Pedestrianised Area

Market Street Milton Rooms

Yorkersgate

24 Malton & Norton Highways Improvements : Consultation Questionnaire – January 20011 Market Place Improvements N 3: Market Place Improvements: Shared Space Option

As an alternative to Options One or Two some people may like the idea of a ‘shared space’, where vehicles are still allowed in all areas but mix with pedestrians and cyclists in a shared level that combines road and footpath space. Traditional road markings like kerbs, lines, signs and traffic signals are removed to slow traffic and create a more considerate and safer mix of vehicles and pedestrians. This has worked well on the continent although there are major concerns about the impacts on those with impaired hearing or vision and this approach can prove difficult in car parking areas, where vehicles are reversing and manouvering. If you support the idea of shared space would you like to see this applied to the Market Place only or to Saville Street and St Michael’s Street as well? Please mark your comments in the space provided, in question 2, on the enclosed questionnaire. (Estimated Cost : £1,275,000)

N3 Finkle Street

Wheelgate

St Michael’s Street

Shared Space Market Place

Saville Street

Market Street

Yorkersgate

25 Other Town Centre Options

Do you support this package of smaller-scale changes to improve the appearance of other town centre streets? Please mark your comments in the space provided, in question 3, on the enclosed questionnaire

O: Newbiggin & Wheelgate

Move the on-street parking from the east to the west side of the road to improve visibility and safety at Butcher Corner, widen footpaths, provide an additional pedestrian crossing point to help access, and resurface footpaths with higher quality conservation paving.

(Estimated Cost : £360,000)

O Wheelgate

N Existing Parking

Puffin Crossing on Wheelgate to be retained

Existing Parking Re-located Parking

Pedestrian Crossing

Butcher Corner

26 Malton & Norton Highways Improvements : Consultation Questionnaire – January 20011

Other Town Centre Options

P: Yorkersgate

Resurface footways with higher quality conservation paving and install new raised crossing point at the pedestrian exit from Water Lane.

(Estimated Costs : £200,000)

P Raised footpaths across access roads N

Market Street

Yorkersgate

Railway Street

Pedestrian Crossing Water Lane

27 www.northyorks.gov.uk/maltonandnortontransport

The Ordnance Survey mapping shown in this publication is provided by North Yorkshire County Council under license from the Ordnance Survey in order to fulfil its public function to publicise local public services. The mapping used in this document is reproduced from Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. 100017946 2010

Reference: Bxxx xx/xx Malton & Norton Service Centre Transportation Strategy Consultation Questionnaire - March 2011

Please tell us which schemes you would like to see progressed, by ticking ONE box for EACH of the schemes. It is important that you give us your views on all the schemes (A to M). Information provided will be held for the sole purpose of and used in connection with the above project, in accordance with the Data Protection Act 1998.

Malton Strongly Agree No Disagree Strongly agree view disagree A: Improvements to the Finkle Street and Spital Street junctions on Newbiggin. B: Central Area and Commercial Street 20 mph zone.

Surrounding villages Strongly Agree No Disagree Strongly agree view disagree C: Buttercrambe Bridge (for information only) No response required D: Amotherby (B1257) to Kirkby Mills (A170) route study. E: Luttons to Foxholes - speed reduction measures

Maintenance schemes Strongly Agree No Disagree Strongly agree view disagree F: Footway renewal on the Showfield Lane Industrial Estate. G: Resurface The Horsewalk on Langton Road. H: Passing places on Bazeleys Lane, Norton. I: Resurfacing Railway Street, Malton J: Resurfacing Saville Street, Malton. K: Footway improvements - Saville Street, Malton. L: Footway improvements - The Luttons to Butterwick. HA Scheme and NYCC complementary measures M: A64 Brambling Fields interchange, the alterations/improvements to Railway Street, Wells Lane and Norton Road and the associated complementary measures would be delivered as a package of works. Strongly Agree No Disagree Strongly agree view disagree Please indicate if you support the proposed package of works:

Comment: Malton Town Centre Enhancement on behalf of Ryedale District Council

Ryedale District Council are seeking your views on potential Town Centre Improvements for Malton Please give us your comments on which schemes you would like to see progressed, by completing the survey below. Information provided will be held for the sole purpose of and used in connection with the above project, in accordance with the Data Protection Act 1998.

Q1 Which is your preferred option for the Market Place?

Option N1 Option N2 Option N3 Option N4 No change

Other option (please explain your preferred option):

Q2 Are you in favour of incorporating shared space into Saville Street and St Michael's Street?

a Saville Street Comment: Yes No

b St Michael's Street Comment: Yes No

Q3 Are you in favour of the proposed approach to the enhancements to:

O Newbiggin/Wheelgate Comment: Yes No

P Yorkersgate Comment: Yes No

Q4 Do you have any other comments to make about these ideas? Equality monitoring

For the purposes of equality monitoring, please complete the following questions.

Any information provided will be kept confidential.

North Yorkshire County Council is committed to the elimination of discrimination. We ask that you complete the monitoring form below which is based on information that could lead to bias or discrimination. This is to ensure that our services are provided without discrimination, in a fair manner which encourages equality of outcome. All information is treated in confidence and only used for statistical monitoring.

Please write your year of birth below:

Y Y Y Y

Gender

Male Female

Do you consider yourself to be a disabled person or to have a long term, limiting condition? Yes No

What is your ethnic group?

White Asian/British Asian Black/African/Caribbean/Black British

Mixed/Multiple ethnic groups Other ethnic group

Please tell us the first part of your home postcode:

Y O 1 7 7

Thank you for completing this survey

North Yorkshire County Council, County Hall, Northallerton, North Yorkshire, DL7 8AD

If you require any further information regarding this strategy, or if you require it in another language or format please contact our Customer Service Centre, Monday to Friday 8.00am - 5.30pm (closed weekends and bank holidays). Tel: 0845 8727374 email: [email protected] or visit our website at www.northyorks.gov.uk A64 Brambling Fields Interchange – Community Involvement Report

Appendix C Press Clipping

A64/REP/A64/REP/CIV/S00/0100/0002/A

A64 Brambling Fields Interchange – Community Involvement Report

Appendix D List of Stakeholders

A64/REP/A64/REP/CIV/S00/0100/0002/A MALTON & NORTON SCTS STAKEHOLDER LIST Name Address 1 Address 2 Address 3 Address 4 Address 5 PostCode Organisation Michael Knaggs New Uplands Castle Howard Road Malton North Yorkshire YO17 6NJ NYCC Members David Lloyd-Williams Hawthorn House 2 Langton Road Norton North Yorkshire YO17 6NJ NYCC Members Ronald Haigh High Croft Main Street Wombleton York YO62 7RX NYCC Members Clare Wood Brockfield Hall Warthill YORK YO19 5XJ NYCC Members Julian Rudd / Daniel Wheelwright Ryedale DC Ryedale House Malton North Yorkshire YO17 7HH Ryedale District Council Paul Andrews 2 The Beeches Great Abton Malton North Yorkshire YO17 6RS Ryedale District Council Anthony Hemesley Applebye House 99 Town Street Old Malton Malton Ryedale District Council Lindsay Burr Sutton Grange Langton Road Norton Malton YO17 9PU Ryedale District Council Howard Keal 19 St. Nicholas Street Norton Malton North Yorkshire YO17 9AQ Ryedale District Council Elizabeth Shields Firby Hall Firby North Yorkshire YO60 7LH Ryedale District Council David Jackson 25 The Ridings Norton Malton North Yorkshire YO17 9AP Ryedale District Council Dinah Keal 19 St. Nicholas Street Norton Malton North Yorkshire YO17 9AQ Ryedale District Council Jane Wilford 19 Horsemarket Road Malton North Yorkshire YO17 7NB Ryedale District Council Robert Wainwright Hall Farm Hovingham York North Yorkshire YO62 4LF Ryedale District Council Brian Maud Sleights Farm Low Moor Rillington Malton YO17 8JU Ryedale District Council John Raper 2 White House Farm Cottages Foxholes Driffield North Yorkshire YO25 3QG Ryedale District Council Eric Hope Rose Cottage High Street Thornton le Clay York YO60 7TE Ryedale District Council Edward Legard Appleton House Appleton-le-Street Malton North Yorkshire YO17 6PG Ryedale District Council Ms N Littler Impala Cottage Acklam Malton North Yorkshire YO17 9RG Parish Clerk Mrs B M Borrett 2 Meadowfield Amotherby Malton North Yorkshire YO17 6TS Parish Clerk Mr R Ellis 8 Quarry Hill Appleton le Street Malton North Yorkshire YO17 6PQ Parish Clerk Mrs J Gibbs 2 Festival Cottages Barton le Willows York North Yorkshire YO60 7PD Parish Clerk Mrs M Hardy 2 Low Farm Cottage Barton le Street Malton North Yorkshire YO17 6PL Parish Clerk Mrs Warren 22 Chapel Road Settrington Malton North Yorkshire YO17 8NP Parish Clerk Mr I Brown (Parish Chairman) Riverdale Brawby Malton North Yorkshire YO17 6PY Parish Clerk Mrs G Woodhead The Holt Main Street Broughton Malton YO17 6QJ Parish Clerk Sarah Summers 3 Beech Tree Cottages Bulmer York North Yorkshire YO60 7BS Parish Clerk Mrs S Sims Mount Farm House Burythorpe Malton North Yorkshire YO17 9LJ Parish Clerk Mr E H Wicks Barnby Farm Bossall York North Yorkshire YO60 7NS Parish Clerk Mrs M Hardy 2 Low Farm Cottage Barton le Street Malton North Yorkshire YO17 6PL Parish Clerk Mr J C Thompson Springwell House Main Street Claxton York YO60 7SD Parish Clerk Dr C Ridgeway c/o Castle Howard Estate Ltd Castle Howard York North Yorkshire YO60 7DA Parish Clerk Mr E L Thompson Pond Farm Crambe York North Yorkshire YO60 7JR Parish Clerk Mrs L Harrison Harton House Station Road Gilling East York YO62 4JL Parish Clerk Ms A Fothergill Southview House Westow York North Yorkshire YO60 7NE Parish Clerk Mrs Elizabeth Hudson Busk Lodge Oak Busk Lane Flaxton York YO60 7RL Parish Clerk Mrs Fiona Hill The Brye Field House Farm Thornton-le-Clay York YO60 7QA Parish Clerk Mr D A Batley Apple Garth Green Dyke Lane Slingsby York YO62 4AP Parish Clerk Miss K Barker 15 Main Street Ganton Scarborough North Yorkshire YO12 4NR Parish Clerk Mrs M Parker Whinfield The Lane Gate Helmsley York YO41 1JT Parish Clerk Mrs L Harrison Harton House Station Road Gilling East York YO62 4JL Parish Clerk Mr R Scott Pear Tree Cottage Great Habton Malton North Yorkshire YO17 6TU Parish Clerk Mr I J Walters (Parish Chairman) Cherry Tree Cottage Harton York North Yorkshire YO60 7NP Parish Clerk Mr H Rayment (Parish Chairman) The Estate Office Castle Howard York North Yorkshire YO60 7DA Parish Clerk Mrs C Lintern Colourfield Sand Lane West Heslerton Malton YO17 8SG Parish Clerk Mrs J Wood 5 Blue Row High Street Hovingham York YO62 4LA Parish Clerk Mr M Cassell 1 Howsham Village York North Yorkshire YO60 7PH Parish Clerk Mrs Parsons 9 Southfields Scagglethorpe Malton North Yorkshire YO17 8DS Parish Clerk Mrs K Husband Field House Kirby Grindalythe Malton North Yorkshire YO17 8DB Parish Clerk Ms H Milner (Parish Chairman) Carrier House Langton Malton North Yorkshire YO17 9QP Parish Clerk Mrs J C Woods Millbeck York Road Leavening Malton YO17 9SL Parish Clerk Mrs A Bailey Rose Villa West Lilling York North Yorkshire YO60 6RP Parish Clerk Mr J Corbett Blueberry Coft West Lutton Malton North Yorkshire YO17 8TA Parish Clerk Mr M P C Skehan (Town Clerk) 2 Leysthorpe Cottages Oswaldkirk York North Yorkshire YO62 5YD Parish Clerk Mrs R Tierney (Town Clerk) The Old Courthouse 84b Commercial Street Norton-on-Derwent Malton YO17 9ES Parish Clerk Mr C Adnitt 11 Cormorant Close Filey YO14 0ED North Yorkshire YO14 0ED Parish Clerk Mr J C Thompson Springwell House Main Street Claxton York YO60 7SD Parish Clerk Mr C Lane Jasmine Cottage Scagglethorpe Malton North Yorkshire YO17 8DU Parish Clerk Mrs Carol Lyon Cundill Cottage Scampston Malton North Yorkshire YO17 8NG Parish Clerk Mr P Jones Mill Cottage Leppington Malton North Yorkshire YO17 9RN Parish Clerk Mrs A E Corner 12 / 13 Town Green Lane Settrington Malton North Yorkshire YO17 8NR Parish Clerk Mrs M Walker Laburnum Cottage 18a Hilda's Street Sherburn Malton YO17 8PG Parish Clerk Mr B C Taylor The Mill House Lilling Wood West Lilling York YO60 6RP Parish Clerk Mr D A Batley Apple Garth Green Dyke Lane Slingsby York YO62 4AP Parish Clerk Mr B C Taylor The Mill House Lilling Wood West Lilling York YO60 6RP Parish Clerk Mrs J Holtby 30 The Ridings Norton Malton North Yorkshire YO17 9AP Parish Clerk Mrs A Hartas The Pheasantry Main Street Terrington York YO60 6PU Parish Clerk Mrs Lynne Boyes Round the Bend Thixendale Malton North Yorkshire YO17 9TG Parish Clerk Mrs G Rivis Rivendell Thorpe Bassett Malton North Yorkshire YO17 8LU Parish Clerk James Stout The Cottage Warthill York North Yorkshire YO19 5XL Parish Clerk Miss A Lee 1 Rarey Drive Weaverthorpe Malton YO17 8HA North Yorkshire YO17 8HA Parish Clerk Mr R J I Corden Conrad Cottage Welburn York North Yorkshire YO60 7DX Parish Clerk Ms A Fothergill Southview House Westow York North Yorkshire YO60 7NE Parish Clerk Mr C C May Ceng FI Mech E (Parish Chairman) White Rose House Wharram-le-Street Malton North Yorkshire YO17 9TL Parish Clerk Mr C Adnitt 11 Cormorant Close Filey North Yorkshire YO14 0ED Parish Clerk Mr G Croft 2 Deepdale Wintringham Malton North Yorkshire YO17 8HX Parish Clerk British Red Cross Red Cross House Zetland Street Northallerton North Yorkshire DL6 1NB RYECAT Ltd George House Derwent Road York Rd Industrial EstateMalton YO17 6YB Wheels2Work Ryedale and Scarborough George House Derwent Road York Rd Industrial EstateMalton YO17 6YB York Wheels York Hospitals Bridge Lane York North Yorkshire YO31 8HE North Yorkshire Police Police Station Old Malton Rd Malton North Yorkshire YO17 7EY North Yorkshire Police Steve Burrell Traffic Management Officer Central Area Fulford Road York YO10 4BY North Yorkshire Fire & Rescue Malton Castlegate Malton North Yorkshire YO17 7EA Settrington All Saints CofE VC Primary School Mrs Catherine Hanch Settrington Malton North Yorkshire YO17 8NP Malton Community Primary School Mr M Poole Highfield Road Malton North Yorkshire YO17 7DB St Mary's RC Primary School Mr David Harrison Highfield Road Malton North Yorkshire YO17 7DB Norton Community Primary School Position Vacant Grove Street Norton Malton North Yorkshire Norton College Mr Tony Rawdin Langton Road Norton Malton North Yorkshire YO17 9PT Rillington Community Primary School Mr D Swann High Street Rillington Malton North Yorkshire YO17 8LA Malton School Rob Williams Middlecave School Malton North Yorkshire YO17 7NH Langton Primary School Miss Louise Partridge Langton Malton North Yorkshire YO17 9QP Amotherby Community Primary School Mr R Audsley Meadowfield Amotherby North Yorkshire YO17 6TG West Heslerton CofE VC Primary School Mrs Rachel Wells High Street West Heslerton Malton North Yorkshire YO17 8RD Leavening Community Primary School Mrs Mellor Back Lane Leavening Malton YO17 9SW Welburn Community Primary School Helen Thomson Welburn York North Yorkshire YO60 7DX Luttons Community Primary School Mrs T Gilbank West Lutton Malton North Yorkshire YO17 8TF Slingsby Community Primary School Mrs G Hardacre The Green Slingsby York YO62 4AA Sherburn CofE VC Primary School Mrs C Barnes St. Hilda's Street Sherburn Nr Malton North Yorkshire YO17 8PG Weaverthorpe CofE VC Primary School Mrs J Asquith Weaverthorpe Malton North Yorkshire YO17 8ES Terrington CofE VA Primary School Ms McCallay (Until October 2008) Terrington York North Yorkshire YO60 6QB Hovingham CofE VC Primary School Mrs M Skinner Main Street Hovingham York YO62 4LF Sheriff Hutton Primary School Mrs P Powell West End Sheriff Hutton York YO60 1PH Sand Hutton CofE VC Primary School Janet Wardell Sand Hutton York North Yorkshire YO41 1LB Warthill CofE VC Primary School Janet Wardell Warthill York North Yorkshire YO19 5XL Ryedale Voluntary Action Sarah Richardson Wentworth Street Malton North Yorkshire YO17 7BN Ryedale Child and Youth Projects Memorial Hall Potter Hill Pickering YO18 8AA Age Concern Scarborough & District 39 Aberdeen Walk Scarborough North Yorkshire YO11 1BD Scarborough and Ryedale Carers Resource Outgang Road Pickering North Yorkshire YO18 7EL Yorkshire Motorcycle Action Group David Short 23 Larch Rise Easingwold York YO61 3RZ YO61 3RZ Disability Action Yorkshire Unit i4A Hornbeam Park Oval Harrogate HG2 8RB North Yorkshire Federation of Womens Institute Norby Front Street Thirsk North Yorkshire YO7 1BG Ryedale-in-Touch In-touch Office The Portakabin Wentworth Street Malton YO17 7BN Road Haulage Association - Northern Region Roadway House 35 Monument Hill Weybridge Surrey KT13 8RN Freight Transport Association - Northern Region Low Lane Horsforth Leeds LS18 5NU Yorkshire Wildlife Trust 1 St. Georges Pl York North Yorkshire YO24 1GN Yorkshire Tourist Board 312 Tadcaster Road York North Yorkshire YO24 1GS Yorkshire Forward Ian Stewart Spitfire House Aviator Court Clifton Moor York YO30 4GY British Horse Society Wendy Suddes Stoneleigh Deer Park Kenilworth Warwickshire CV8 2XZ Sustrans 2 Cathedral Square College Green Bristol BS1 5DD Ramblers Association Peter Leese The School House Fimber Driffield YO25 9LY Cycle / Touring Club (CTC) Gerry Boswell 5 Invicta court Foxwood Lane Acomb York YO24 3NL Right to Ride Colin Clarke Yorkshire Ambulance Service Fairfields Shipton Road Skelton York YO30 1XW Landowners/Tenants: Lord Middleton Birdsall Estates Malton North Yorkshire YO17 9NU Ralph Michael Rodney Brewis 17 Woodthorp Road Putney London SW15 6UE Graham and Amanda Batchelor Wold View Scarborough Road Norton Malton North Yorkshire YO17 8EE Norman Christopher Lamb Fishers Farm Town Street Settrington Malton North Yorkshire YO17 8NR

Environment Agency North East Regional Office Rivers House 21 Park Square South Leeds West Yorkshire LS1 2QG Canals? N/A Drainage Boards? N/A The Caravan Club Limited The Caravan Club Limited, East Grinstead House, East Grinstead, West Sussex RH19 1UA The Automobile Association The Automobile Association Fanum House UG Basing View Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 4EA RAC Motoring Services 8 Surrey St Norwich Norfolk NR1 3NG British Waterways 64 Clarendon Road Watford Herts WD17 1DA

Integrated Passenger Transport North Yorkshire County Council County Hall Northallerton North Yorkshire DL7 8AH A64 Brambling Fields Interchange – Community Involvement Report

Appendix E Responses to Service Centre Transportation Strategy Consultation

A64/REP/A64/REP/CIV/S00/0100/0002/A Malton & Norton SCTS - 160 responses total Responses: 64 Online 96 Scanned

Malton No Answer Strongly Agree Agree No View Disagree Strongly Disagree Total A Im provements to Finkle & Spital St junctions on Newbiggin 8 5.00% 22 13.75% 69 43.13% 40 25.00% 13 8.13% 8 5.00% 160 100.00%

B Central Area and Commercial St 20mph zone 11 6.88% 31 19.38% 55 34.38% 32 20.00% 20 12.50% 11 6.88% 160 100.00%

Surrounding villages No Answer Strongly Agree Agree No View Disagree Strongly Disagree Total C Buttercrambe Bridge (information only)

D Asmotherby to Kirkby Mills route study. 35 21.88% 26 16.25% 23 14.38% 64 40.00% 6 3.75% 6 3.75% 160 100.00%

E Luttons to Foxholes - speed reduction measures 31 19.38% 35 21.88% 27 16.88% 46 28.75% 11 6.88% 10 6.25% 160 100.00%

Maintenance schemes No Answer Strongly Agree Agree No View Disagree Strongly Disagree Total F Footway renewal on the Showfield Lane Industrial Estate 10 6.25% 15 9.38% 62 38.75% 39 24.38% 19 11.88% 15 9.38% 160 100.00%

G Resurface the horsewalk on Langton Rd 14 8.75% 12 7.50% 33 20.63% 66 41.25% 17 10.63% 18 11.25% 160 100.00%

H Passing places on Bazeleys Lane 12 7.50% 22 13.75% 44 27.50% 60 37.50% 11 6.88% 11 6.88% 160 100.00%

I Resurfacing Railway St, malton 10 6.25% 35 21.88% 76 47.50% 32 20.00% 7 4.38% 0 0.00% 160 100.00%

J Resurfacing Saville St, Malton 12 7.50% 28 17.50% 66 41.25% 42 26.25% 11 6.88% 1 0.63% 160 100.00%

K Footway improvements - Saville St, Malton 11 6.88% 27 16.88% 64 40.00% 42 26.25% 11 6.88% 5 3.13% 160 100.00%

L Footway improvements - The Luttons to Butterwick 8 5.00% 47 29.38% 18 11.25% 69 43.13% 6 3.75% 12 7.50% 160 100.00%

HA scheme and NYCC No Answer Strongly Agree Agree No View Disagree Strongly Disagree Total M A64 Brambling fields interchange complementary measures 10 6.25% 71 44.38% 46 28.75% 14 8.75% 9 5.63% 10 6.25% 160 100.00%

Ryedale District Council

No Answer Option N1 Option N2 Option N3 No Change Total Q1 Which is your preferred option for the Market Place? 20 12.50% 47 29.38% 10 6.25% 12 7.50% 71 44.38% 160 100.00%

Shared space into Saville & St Michael's Street? No Answer Yes No Total Q2a Saville Street 25 15.63% 45 28.13% 90 56.25% 160 100.00%

2b St Michael's Street 28 17.50% 41 25.63% 91 56.88% 160 100.00%

Proposed approach to the enhancements to: No Answer Yes No Total Q3a Newbiggin/Wheelgate 26 16.25% 58 36.25% 76 47.50% 160 100.00%

3b Yorkersgate 29 18.13% 71 44.38% 60 37.50% 160 100.00%

Gender No Answer Male Female Total 10 6.25% 86 53.75% 64 40.00% 160 100.00%

Disability No Answer Yes No Total 12 7.50% 24 15.00% 124 77.50% 160 100.00% Count of Postcode_1 Count of Postcode_1 Postcode_1 Postcode_2 Total Postcode_1 Postcode_2 Total No Ans No Ans 6 No Ans No Ans 3.75% No Ans Total 6 No Ans Total 3.75% YO11 9 1 YO11 9 0.63% YO11 Total 1 YO11 Total 0.63% YO14 0 1 YO14 0 0.63% YO14 Total 1 YO14 Total 0.63% YO17 1 1 YO17 1 0.63% 6 12 6 7.50% 7 41 7 25.63% 8 44 8 27.50% 9 25 9 15.63% No Ans 7 No Ans 4.38% YO17 Total 130 YO17 Total 81.25% yo18 No Ans 2 yo18 No Ans 1.25% yo18 Total 2 yo18 Total 1.25% YO32 No Ans 1 YO32 No Ans 0.63% YO32 Total 1 YO32 Total 0.63% YO41 No Ans 1 YO41 No Ans 0.63% YO41 Total 1 YO41 Total 0.63% YO60 6 1 YO60 6 0.63% 7 4 7 2.50% No Ans 1 No Ans 0.63% YO60 Total 6 YO60 Total 3.75% YO62 4 1 YO62 4 0.63% 6 10 6 6.25% YO62 Total 11 YO62 Total 6.88% YO17 9 No Ans 1 YO17 9 No Ans 0.63% YO17 9 Total 1 YO17 9 Total 0.63% Grand Total 160 Grand Total 100.00% Count of Age Gender Count of Age Gender Age Male Female No Ans Grand Total Age Male Female No Ans Grand Total 1917 1 1 1917 0.00% 1.56% 0.00% 0.63% 1922 2 2 1922 2.33% 0.00% 0.00% 1.25% 1923 1 1 1923 1.16% 0.00% 0.00% 0.63% 1925 1 1 1925 1.16% 0.00% 0.00% 0.63% 1929 1 1 1929 1.16% 0.00% 0.00% 0.63% 1930 1 1 2 1930 1.16% 1.56% 0.00% 1.25% 1931 1 1 1931 1.16% 0.00% 0.00% 0.63% 1932 1 1 1932 1.16% 0.00% 0.00% 0.63% 1934 1 1 2 1934 1.16% 1.56% 0.00% 1.25% 1935 3 1 4 1935 3.49% 1.56% 0.00% 2.50% 1936 1 1 1936 1.16% 0.00% 0.00% 0.63% 1937 1 2 3 1937 1.16% 3.13% 0.00% 1.88% 1938 1 1 2 1938 1.16% 1.56% 0.00% 1.25% 1939 1 3 4 1939 1.16% 4.69% 0.00% 2.50% 1941 2 2 4 1941 2.33% 3.13% 0.00% 2.50% 1942 5 1 6 1942 5.81% 1.56% 0.00% 3.75% 1943 3 3 1943 3.49% 0.00% 0.00% 1.88% 1944 4 1 5 1944 4.65% 1.56% 0.00% 3.13% 1945 5 1 6 1945 5.81% 1.56% 0.00% 3.75% 1946 5 5 10 1946 5.81% 7.81% 0.00% 6.25% 1947 3 4 1 8 1947 3.49% 6.25% 10.00% 5.00% 1948 6 2 8 1948 6.98% 3.13% 0.00% 5.00% 1949 1 3 4 1949 1.16% 4.69% 0.00% 2.50% 1950 2 1 3 1950 2.33% 1.56% 0.00% 1.88% 1951 3 3 6 1951 3.49% 4.69% 0.00% 3.75% 1952 1 1 2 1952 1.16% 1.56% 0.00% 1.25% 1953 1 1 2 1953 1.16% 1.56% 0.00% 1.25% 1954 2 2 4 1954 2.33% 3.13% 0.00% 2.50% 1955 1 1 1955 0.00% 1.56% 0.00% 0.63% 1956 1 2 3 1956 1.16% 3.13% 0.00% 1.88% 1957 1 1 2 1957 1.16% 1.56% 0.00% 1.25% 1958 1 2 3 1958 1.16% 3.13% 0.00% 1.88% 1960 3 2 5 1960 3.49% 3.13% 0.00% 3.13% 1961 1 1 2 1961 1.16% 1.56% 0.00% 1.25% 1963 1 1 2 1963 1.16% 1.56% 0.00% 1.25% 1964 3 3 1964 0.00% 4.69% 0.00% 1.88% 1965 2 2 1965 2.33% 0.00% 0.00% 1.25% 1966 1 1 2 1966 1.16% 1.56% 0.00% 1.25% 1967 1 1 1967 1.16% 0.00% 0.00% 0.63% 1968 2 2 1968 0.00% 3.13% 0.00% 1.25% 1969 2 2 1969 0.00% 3.13% 0.00% 1.25% 1971 2 1 3 1971 2.33% 1.56% 0.00% 1.88% 1972 1 1 1972 0.00% 1.56% 0.00% 0.63% 1973 1 1 1973 1.16% 0.00% 0.00% 0.63% 1974 1 1 1974 0.00% 1.56% 0.00% 0.63% 1975 1 1 1975 0.00% 1.56% 0.00% 0.63% 1976 1 1 1976 0.00% 1.56% 0.00% 0.63% 1978 1 1 1978 0.00% 1.56% 0.00% 0.63% 1983 1 1 1983 1.16% 0.00% 0.00% 0.63% 1984 1 1 1984 0.00% 1.56% 0.00% 0.63% 1985 4 4 1985 4.65% 0.00% 0.00% 2.50% 1986 2 2 1986 2.33% 0.00% 0.00% 1.25% 1987 1 1 1987 0.00% 1.56% 0.00% 0.63% 1989 1 1 1989 1.16% 0.00% 0.00% 0.63% No Ans 3 1 9 13 No Ans 3.49% 1.56% 90.00% 8.13% 1933 1 1 1933 1.16% 0.00% 0.00% 0.63% Grand Total 86 64 10 160 Grand Total 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% QM comments I think the A64 needs all Junctions improving along with the Broughton road Junction to give access to and from the A64 1 from the B1257 which would ease traffic in malton, also I support the B1257 Amotherby to A170 Kirkby mills route study that's a busy road with many dangers I use the road everyday and safety needs looking at so that scheme needs to go I welcome the improvements to (1) Brambling Fields junction and (2) HGV ban at the level crossing ( except for access ). 2 Some of the associated " one way" proposals are less appealing and not necessarily tied to the success of 1 and 2. Some of proposed "one way" introductions and the loss of the traffic lane at Castlegate/Butcher corner is not obviously an meant to take from hull to BATA at Amotherby it can only pass through norton and malton via castlegate and wheelgate! If all Junctions on the A64 malton bypass were all movement including a B1257 Junction then HGV's could be banned 3 but you are not providing another route for them! Also speed limits on Amotherby to Kirkby mills route do need looking at along with sections of double white lines! I have seen some stupid overtaking on that road! a route study is a must on 4 HadAll the to maltontick box bypass because Junctions I support need Brambling improving, Fields B12 - 57however, and York totally road against the "complementary measures". To say you have to have both as a total package is akin to a bribe/threat. Making use of these roads more difficult than now is likely to drive people away from Malton and will only move the air quality problems further along the respective roads. The air quality at Butcher Corner wants improving by improving the drains! Why on earth can we not simply have a 5 weight restriction to force heavy vehicles to use the by pass instead of this hammer to crack a nut attitude? And why waste money at a time when money is scarce. There are more deserving schemes than this to spend tax payers money on. Put the money aside to spend on getting a Scarborough access onto the bypass at Musley Bank instead of wasting it on these "complementary measures" which are far from complimentary. So I have changed my mind and decided to There needs to be a further solution to the problem of increased traffic over the railway crossing once all the proposed 6 houses in Norton have been built - this does not go far enough although it is a much-needed improvement for access Traffic calming should not include speed bumps(or whatever one calls them) rumble strips should be used instead. 7 Speed bumps cause damage to tyres in some cases and suspension problems and extra emissions from braking and re- 8 I think the work should be done asap extend road past bacon factory to link in.40 mph sign required near to Mile post, north side of Great Barugh, slows traffic 9 near to caravan park and allows safety access from Brawby. I would Just like to comment on the A170 Kirkbymoorside to B1257 Amotherby route study this something that is a must I use that road daily and feel for the people that live in Malton, Normanby, Great Barugh and Amotherby the speed limits are Just abused and need enforcing in a better way its a busy route! also bends need better signing and sections where 10 its unsafe to overtake need double white lines! the fact is with that route is that it will only get busier as its such a short way to malton with the only other route via pickering but that's longer and more congested so people will always use the route Via Amotherby as I do, as its a main link it should also be B class status from Amotherby through to the A170 at Entirely agree with improvements to Brambling Fields junction, and to increasing pedestrian safety at Butcher Corner. However suggested one-way on Railway street will be a total disaster, requiring all vehicles to get caught up in both the 11 Butcher Corner traffic lights and Morrisons traffic. Since railway street is not a residential area, I don't see why traffic passing along this road is a problem - except for the junction at the railway crossing which could do with some safety The lowering of the speed limit in luttons and helperthorpe is essential. Children have to cross the road to get to school 12 busses and the current speed of vehicles often peeks at 60+ mph with vehicles hitting higher speeds at kicking out time from the Blue Bell pub in weaverthorpe. It is an area where people have to back out onto the road from drives and sooner Please note - re: L Footway improvements Luttons - Butterwick The only shop accessible without a car from 13 Weaverthorpe is at Butterwick and the footpath has all but disappeared. It would be a massive improvement to have this The wolds valley urgently needs footpath improvements, also the 30 mph speed restrictions, increased use by HGV / 14 tractors can make it dangerous standing on the pavements outside your own house Is there a need for additional slips at the east end of the bypass to cater for hgv traffic from the coast that will be 15 prevented from accessing the industrial units on the east of town by the ban at Castlegate? 16 The damage to the road surface from the Luttons to Foxholes is at danger levels and any one of the potholes could cause serious 17 Interchange itself is urgently needed. Other associated works except resurfacing are totally unnecessary. Removal of one lane in Castlegate will result in longer queues as traffic turning right will be unable to get out of the way of 18 traffic wanting to go straight on. Will be unnecessary if 30% reduction in traffic flow achieved. Footways wide enough Concern re lots of traffic lane on Castlegate will lead to longer queues approaching lights. Mill Street very unsatisfactory 19 as part of B1248 - improve/replace. 20 Safety reasons more people should walk that using their cars but not safe at the moment. From one who knows. An awareness and publicity campaign should be aimed al local haughliers eg Deans Distribution Whatts Ian Moset etc 21 highlighting the necessary changes. I disagree strongly with arrangements at Butcher Corner. Traffic moving up Castlegate to turn to Pickering will block the 22 other traffic to Helmsley because of the flow of traffic south from Wheelgate round Castlegate. I would suggest either the existing two lanes be retained or a flilter arrow be inserted to allow traffic to turn right to Pickering. I strongly support the Norton Road element which would massively improve pedestrian and cycle links between the 23 towns. I'm less sure about removing the Castlegate turning lane. 24 Do Brambling Fields interchanges then do look at the rest. 25 Why no a availability to comment on proposals for Butchers Corner/Castlegate? I strongly disagree with the signing of Until such time as improvements are made to western end of bypass traffic from the east will still use the town centre. 26 Also traffic from north (B1257) have no alternative route. Strongly agree with A64 interchange. However not sure about Norton Rd alterations as it means Norton residents going 27 home from station will have to use Wells Lane/Butchers Corner. Can taxis use bus lane? Strongly disapprove of lane 28 Stop parking in Saville Street. 29 The road on Showfield Lane is in need of repair. Horse walk on Langton Rd should be kept by the stables. 30 Brambling Fields interchange giving access to Norton for eastbound A64 heavy traffic would surely solve other traffic 31 This must be the highest priority with effective enforcement against HGV at level crossing and Railway St. 32 Why has this taken so long when we all know what needed doing years ago? 33 The Brambling Fields scheme could be solved better by a roundabout!! 34 If finance is limited scheme M and its associated measures should have priority over all the other schemes. 35 Butcher Corner traffic lights should be replaced to operate in the same way as those at Newbiggin/The Mount junction. For the scheme to work as a whole the present restriction on turning right from the bridge on to Norton Rd MUST be 36 enforced. Currently no one seems to be able to enforce this along with the right turn at the top of Railway Street. The upgrade of Brambling Fields is now less priority owing to decreased bacon factory traffic. Consideration should be 37 given to other A64 junctions also. Re. Removal of traffic lane Castlegate/Butchers Corner. Unless traffic light sequence is changed eg. to one road a time 38 cars/vehicles wishing to turn right to Old Malton will hold up through traffic making the queue longer. 39 Some proposals are expensive and of marginal value. But the main thrust - in Malton - is very low value. 40 A complete waste of money. Like the so called improvements to Norton footpaths. Money could be better spent on a 41 Money could be spent better elsewhere so filling pot homes in and resurfacing rods in the area. 42 These expensive measures just move congestion. Helmsley junction to A64 would be more greater benefit for much The junction of Wells Lane and Castlegate it is clearly difficult to turn right from Wells Lane because of traffic backed 43 from the Railway crossing and the entrance/exit to Morrisons without waiting (illegally) on the hatched area. I strongly support the Brambling Fields interchange but think the changes in access to Railway St and Norton Rd are 44 unworkable. They do need resurfacing badly. The removal of one lane of traffic in Castlegate is wrong as traffic will Whilstqueue itbehind is possible right turningto walk traffic pretty for much longer adjacent and c auseto the more A64 pollution.from the York Rd entrance to the Malton Eden Camp there should also be a footpath from the Pickering Road to the New Ship road proposed at Brambling Field thus enabling a 45 northern necklace or arc around Malton. I seriously agree with the A64 Brambling Fields interchange. However I strongly disagree with the Butchers 46 Corner/Castlegate traffic lane removed. I have no views regarding Railway St/Wells Rd and Norton Rd alternatives. A: No need to improve pavements. Agree one way. M: Strongly agree Brambling Fields. Strongly disagree with removing 47 one lane at Castlegate Butchers Corner as this will cause chaos. If you must traffic lights should be phased to allow 48 Removal of one traffic lane at Butchers Corner is a no brainer. The back up of traffic would be horrendous in Norton. 49 Whilst the junction has always been needed the package of works is not accessible. 50 I have always opposed the opening up to traffic of Bazleys Lane. Much used by pedestrians horses and cyclists. Removing the 2 lanes to one at Butcher Corner from Castlegate should be removed (bad enough already with 51 Morrisons!) All other measures OK. HGV's coming into the town from Beverly Buttercrambe and Thirsk will still come via existing routes. Therefore the plan 52 will only go some way to reducing large vehicle congestion. more transportation consideration for Norton. Look at St Nicholas St. Paths damaged by HGV's when Commercial St was 53 being re-piped (water). Bazeleys Lane to Whitewall weight restrictions stop HGV's using it at a short cut. Grants from 54 Essential that a weight restriction order is imposed. Also improve 20mph zone to slow traffic in same street 55 Important to have a weight restriction on St Nicholas St also 20mph zone. 56 Brambling Fields interchange should have been done years ago. Don't agree with losing 1 lane of traffic from Castlegate to Butcher Corner. How will the HGV ban be policed - is every 57 lorry to be stopped to see if it is delivering in town? 58 What about HGV's usage through Malton and Norton towards Helmsley? Not in consideration? Plans not going to remove heavy traffi 59 Proposals to reduce Castlegate to one lane is ridiculous and will cause more congestion and queues. re Item B: The plan on page 4 of the consultation document wrongly labels Castlegate at the end of Church Street (Norton). The recent reconstruction of Commercial Street provides for a 20mph restriction but ideally the restriction 60 should be extended along Church Street and County bridge to link up with restrictions proposed for Norton Rd and Castlegate to provide continuity and avoid reversion to 30mph over a comparatively short section of highway. This would Two lanes in Castlegate should be retained on the approach to the traffic lights. Reduction in traffic levels will improve air 61 quality. The proposals in another example of theory triumphing over practicality. This project while solving some of the problems will not make any difference to traffic going to Beverley. The quickest 62 route is through Malton and Norton and drivers will continue to do so. I cannot understand how making Norton Rd one way to cars will improve traffic through Malton. This is a ridiculous idea. 63 Remaining one traffic lane on Castlegate will only make queuing times much worse! F: Where will HGV's park after reconstruction of path? They hinder exits to sites making it difficult for other road users 64 but where will you give them alternative parking areas? 65 Retain the Castlegate traffic lane through for right turning traffic if signal phasing is not changed. 66 K: Saville Street - the west pavement should be widened to make it a one carriage way - no waiting. I consider that exiting from Spital St is more difficult than from Frinkle St especially because of the cross roads. When 67 used properly the mirrors is more than adequate. because of tree roots and the general disrepair. our village has no speed limit but has had more fatal smashes than any. we would like a wieght limit put on the road from skedhills down to butterwick as we are getting a lot of hgvs using it as a 68 short cut for driffield i and others have young children and the traffic problems are getting worse. we would like a 30mph speed limit put in place. We are only a village of 16 homes and for far to long been over looked. 69 B1257 needs link to A64 to get traffic out of malton! doubt if car numbers would decrease greatly. Overall traffic reduction measures encouraging people to walk, cycle and take public transport would be far less costly and would certainly result in improved air quality. This consultation does not 70 include the £135,000 scheme to upgrade the footpath from Malton to Appleton-le-Street for dual use by cycles which I find surprising. Schemes like this would encourage non-car modes of travel into and out of Malton. provisions for public transport & cycling. The Brambling Fields scheme WILL reduce the number of HGVs from the west having to go through the centre to get to Norton & the south BUT there is still a massive volume of traffic heading north through the town either onto the A169 or the B1257. I fear that the increasing use of SatNavs is directing traffic along 71 these routes. This makes cycling along the B1257 for instance far more dangerous and I am furious that you can consider works to the little used pavements on Showfield Lane whilst neglecting the repeated appeals to rectify the appalling state of the footpath from Broughton into Malton and upgrade it for cycle use. Overall I do not believe the package of works as presented will achieve the reduction in traffic that you claim. I also think that removing the two lanes We need footpaths that can be used to walk from our village to Weaverthrope and Lttuns wihtout having to go in the road 72 (bugy /disabled use only possible on road) Traffic is fast and there are many more large lorries and tractors rushing past at speed, it feels unsafe to walk village paths both in and out of the villages The stupid idea to remove one traffic lane at the traffic lights in castlegate will only increase congestion and could only 73 have been proposed by a university educated dimwit who knows nothing about Malton,congestion,or life in general, also the proposal to change the parking in wheelgate could only have been dreamed up by a brain dead plonker. Please can the route syudy on the road between Amotherby and Kirkby mills be done as its so important I live at normanby and we suffer very high traffic speeds in our 30 zone and other actions are needed along the route to help stop 74 accidents at bends and so on we have not got a problem with traffic using the road as its the main link from kirkby to Malton it could also do with a malton or amotherby sign at Keldholme on the A170 to direct people, its not the traffic just 75 I don't agree with the removal of a traffic lane in Castlegate at Butcher corner. All traffic would be held up by vehicles because of tree roots and the general disrepair. our village has no speed limit but has had more fatal smashes than any. we would like a wieght limit put on the road from skedhills down to butterwick as we are getting a lot of hgvs using it as a 76 short cut for driffield i and others have young children and the traffic problems are getting worse. we would like a 30mph speed limit put in place. We are only a village of 16 homes and for far to long been over looked. 77 B1257 needs link to A64 to get traffic out of malton! doubt if car numbers would decrease greatly. Overall traffic reduction measures encouraging people to walk, cycle and take public transport would be far less costly and would certainly result in improved air quality. This consultation does not 78 include the £135,000 scheme to upgrade the footpath from Malton to Appleton-le-Street for dual use by cycles which I Thefind surprising.whole strategy Schemes will not like properly this would address encourage the issue non-car of reducing modes traffic. of travel There into should and out be of much Malton. more emphasis on better provisions for public transport & cycling. The Brambling Fields scheme WILL reduce the number of HGVs from the west having to go through the centre to get to Norton & the south BUT there is still a massive volume of traffic heading north through the town either onto the A169 or the B1257. I fear that the increasing use of SatNavs is directing traffic along 79 these routes. This makes cycling along the B1257 for instance far more dangerous and I am furious that you can consider works to the little used pavements on Showfield Lane whilst neglecting the repeated appeals to rectify the appalling state of the footpath from Broughton into Malton and upgrade it for cycle use. Overall I do not believe the package of works as presented will achieve the reduction in traffic that you claim. I also think that removing the two lanes We need footpaths that can be used to walk from our village to Weaverthrope and Lttuns wihtout having to go in the road 80 (bugy /disabled use only possible on road) Traffic is fast and there are many more large lorries and tractors rushing past at speed, it feels unsafe to walk village paths both in and out of the villages The stupid idea to remove one traffic lane at the traffic lights in castlegate will only increase congestion and could only 81 have been proposed by a university educated dimwit who knows nothing about Malton,congestion,or life in general, also the proposal to change the parking in wheelgate could only have been dreamed up by a brain dead plonker. normanby and we suffer very high traffic speeds in our 30 zone and other actions are needed along the route to help stop accidents at bends and so on we have not got a problem with traffic using the road as its the main link from kirkby to 82 Malton it could also do with a malton or amotherby sign at Keldholme on the A170 to direct people, its not the traffic just the speeds that are the problem! please do what you can to help the situation 83 I don't agree with the removal of a traffic lane in Castlegate at Butcher corner. All traffic would be held up by vehicles 84 Implications not fully considered I support the Brambling Fields interchange but not the Norton Rd changes. Commercial St is already 20mph. The signs 85 are difficult to see whilst watching traffic at the mini roundabout and other road signs We certainly need to ban HGV's except for access but to reduce the traffic lanes at Castlegate would only increase the 86 length of queuing traffic and therefore wasting time! Other than that I agree. Generally support but abosolutely oppose any proposal to increase or speed up traffic on Bazleys Lane which is a rat run. 87 To speed up traffic would increase risk of accidents and encourage HGV vehicles to use it. We need a 'No HGV sign', a 20mph limit and traffic calming like Langton Rd. 88 Maintenance is long overdue on footway improvements - they are a disgrace! Numerically, alas, fewer people will make the footway improvements L a priority because it’s a rural location as opposed 89 to Malton. That said, ladies pushing prams to school, oldies on walks, have to face speeding trucks on the road as opposed to footpath, impassable in places forces them out. The idea of an interchange is good 'but' this scheme can be made much less expensive if only I roundabout is built - also 90 saving more farming land from cumpolsary purchase. Placed at the eastern end of the interchange it would have the added benefit of slowing the direct A64 traffic down in readiness for the two way traffic before the Scagglethorpe bend - RDC1_comment - Other option (please explain your preferred option): 1 N3, including Saville Street and St Michael Street.

If you are going to interfere with the Market Place then please change the flow of traffic along Saville Street to make it an EXIT from the Market Place. Market Street is not a wide enough junction to carry all that traffic which will have to exit using this if you prevent traffic using 2 Spital Street. But fully agree with one way up Finkle Street and one way down Spital Street. If we have to have some sort of pedestrianised area I would prefer N2 but with two way traffic along Market Place. And why are we doing Continental driving from Finkle Street to Saville Street? Against the shared space - too many possible dangers and we don't have the same laid back attitude in this country as they do on the Continent. And why do we have to try and be like them - let's stay different. Keep Malton as a working market town. I think this is a lovely option and would be a huge improvement for Malton, but I am not convinced of the need for two-way traffic flow to the car-parks up Market Street. Also there should be no parking allowed at any time on Saville Street and St Michael Street should be allowed 3 access at all times. This would help with traffic flow to the central parking space which I hope will remain as free parking to encourage people to stay and spend! 4 Please leave parking for disabled 5 Without change the town keeps it traditional appeal and looks oldish, interesting orginal layout. Changes would detract from appeal.

I prefer N2 with the south side of the market square pedestrianised, although I would also include the area outside the milton rooms, St 6 Michael Street and Saville Street, leaving the Northern edge accessible to traffic. Alternatively I would pedestrianise the whole of the market square and re-route the traffic entirely via Yorkersgate, Wheelgate/Newbiggin and Spital Street. In my opinion closing the north side to traffic but having cars and other vehicles squeezing through the smaller harder to access streets does not make any sense. 7 What a waste of money, the current system works fine. N1 offers greater benefit than N2 and should help frame a greater area of the market square than N2. N3 is likely to result in a jumble of 8 cars and people although illustrations may help dispel this To the North & South of Market Place widen pavements, restrict road to single width and prevent parking, change & raise road surface to 9 indicate a pedestrian priority. St Michaels & Saville streets to be shared spaces with new level surface, no parking and vehicles for access only. 10 Leave it all alone .There is nothing wrong with the system as it is. Stop wasting public money Sack all the stupid consultants. 11 All schemes a total waste of money no advantages but create difficulties. Option N1 especially stupid. 12 Better for pedestrians more spaces as many shops have goods outside their shops. The north sie of the square is [?] for the sunniest to set ie relax in. Also it would [?] the least disruption although there would be the loss of 13 parking spaces in the north side of the church. 14 Option N1 is attractive but better still would be N1 plus N2 the setting of the church would be vastly improved by removing parked cars. More attractive traffic - free area for sitting and relaxing . Neither Malton of Norton has anywhere for wheelchair users of people with small 15 children to sit away from traffic. 16 As N1 but only allow southbound traffic on east side of Market place at present. Two way is too hazardous. 17 Where do we comment on traffic flow at Butchers Corner. I suggest NO CHANGE 18 All other options appear to create more problems then they would solve. 19 All other options seem to create more problems 20 It would improve the appearance of the Market Place and be more pedestrian friendly. A type of 'shared space' arrangement is used by motorists and pedestrians at the awkward level crossing junction! People adapt very well 21 to such a situation. 22 Option 1 Plus more disabled parking. 23 Prefer with option 1 with ample provision for disabled drivers. 24 But the parkign places lost must be replaced by using the cattle market area more effectively. 25 To stop spending money things that are not goign to help Malton bring in tourists. Before this would be effective premises need attention ensuring viable business and sustainable environment. Do not want focus for late 26 night drinking and ASB 27 NW side of Market Place gets all the sun in preference to N2 for pedestrians. N3 offer very limited parking. Two way traffic outside Hoppers would be dangerous. Parking on the south side of the Market Place (even blue badge) causes 28 obstructions to larger vehicles. 29 Any seating on new pedestrian area needs to look down on [?] not up! it is vital that there should ne NO reduction in parking spaces for cars as well as maximum flexibility for access otherwise shoppers such as 30 me will be driven away from Malton altogether. 31 Need for traffic to obtain access to shops and need for parking. 32 Leave it as it is. 33 I have no problem with shared space but if this proved impossible then leave the circulation of the market place as is. 34 I have encountered no serious problems and have lived here all my life (72 years) Option N1 would give an attractive amenuty area in a bright and sunny part of the market place. The pavement cafes would add to the 35 sociability. Could be a good area for outdoor concerts and other events. 36 Why can we not do both N1 and N2?? With two way traffic either side 37 Options show lack of understanding. 38 N3 but with pedestrian only in St Michaels St as explained below. 39 Brilliant option. Start it today. Marvellous 40 Smarted up areas in Market Place nice footpaths. Resurfacing roads keep traffic movement as it is now. 41 All the current proposals have potential grave problems with traffic particularly from Yorkersgate. 42 N3 - different attiitude in UK from cyclists and drivers to continent. N1 and N2 and N3 why do we need pedestrianisation - leave as is. 43 N1 but only if Newgate is retained as 2 way. 44 Possibly keep market street one way to the south. 45 N2 preferred but only if Newgate remains 2 way Not ideal but better than the others. If the Saturday market was transferred to this area. Cover would be an advantage to both shops and 46 traders. 47 P -Yorkersgate - Yes please! None. Two way traffic in front of Hoppers would be a nightmare. Leave it one way. It's difficult enough now trying to drive one-way with 48 people parking and backing out. 49 Especially if the livestock auction site is to be developed as proposed. 50 I am very concerned that any change might make the only exit from a lot of the market place into Yorkersgate. Pedestrianisation will kill the shopping trade in the Market Place. Fewer parkign places mean fewer shoppers. People will not walk from 51 Wentworth St car park. 52 It works now - leave it along. All options could be detrimental to businesses It feels essential that traffic should be able to move freely round the market place, especially all emergency vehicles and refuse collecting 53 vehicles. No point in huge expense unless Fritzwilliam Estate drop their rents so that shops remain open/come back. If they do that then option N1 is 54 best.

RDC2a_comment - Saville Street 1 this would slow traffic and be more natural looking 2 Make Saville Street NO PARKING except for deliveries before 9.30am and after 4pm. And ENFORCE it. 3 I think that it is a nice idea but in reality too dangerous. 4 No a very busy street for cars 5 Would be better to close to vehicles except for access. However shared space better than current arrangements! 6 Yes - so long as no parking 7 see previous comment 8 If it remains a one way street 9 Many cars and vans park on footpaths so have to walk in road. 10 But I would much prefer it to be fully pesedtrianised particularly on market days and during shopping hours through the week. 11 Let us have one thing or the other 12 Improve pavement and stop the illegal parking! 13 No parking to be tolerated in Savile St. 14 As the average age of the population rises the dangers of shared space increase. 15 Traffic is already slow in Market Place and approach road so shared space option would be a natural progression. 16 Unsafe - a road means cars so pedestrians are aware of traffic. 17 Long overdue 18 No room for this. 19 Waste of money. Unnecessary 20 This is already congested and vehicles mount pavement. 21 Widen pavements and prevent parking. Existing parking restrictions are not enforced which results in vehicles mounting the pavement. 22 Could be dangerous to pedestrians 23 Traffic and pedestrians - disaster 24 No Change 25 But not in St Michaels St which should be pedestrians only 26 Put all money into N1 27 Blue badge car parking! 28 Any loss of parking would not be good 29 Widen west footpath so road has same width all the length as at Yorkersgate junction. 30 The way pedestrians use this road it is already shared space! 31 Too risky for the young/impaired. 32 Dangerous to blind and disabled users & children 33 I feel strongly that there is a safety issue 34 Too dangerous

RDC2b_comment - St Michael's Street 1 as above 2 Isin't it already shared space? Who uses the footpaths? But there is no traffic on here during daytime. 3 Would be better to close to vehicles except for access. However shared space better than current arrangements! 4 Yes - but only if current vehicle restrictions (ie access only) still apply. 5 see previous comment 6 If it remains a one way street 7 PreferSafer for acccess pedestrians only and who full use pedestrianisation it as a cut through as above. Shared space is dangerous for bind and partially sighted people the hear impaired 8 etc. 9 ditto [let us have one thing or the other] 10 What about the market stalls? 11 No parking to be tolerated in St. M St 12 This supposed to be restricted entry but this is not observed. The Spitall St exit should be blocked. 13 Examples of above - not much traffic so pedestrians often walk in the road so unprepared for moving vehicles. 14 Long overdue 15 Waste of money. Unnecessary 16 Complicated by library whose future is not know. 17 Retain existing vehicle bad but it must be enforced. 18 As you suggest danger for hard of hearign etc. 19 Very narrow. Should be pedestrian only 20 pedestrian only 21 Put all money into N1 22 Blue badge car parking! 23 But pedestrianise St Nicholas St. 24 too risky for the young/impaired. 25 Too dangerous to many pedestrians 26 I feel strongly that there is a safety issue 27 Too dangerous to many pedestrians

RDC3a_comment - Newbiggim/Wheelgate 1 both streets need improving but will still have heavy traffic until a Junction between the B1257 Amotherby road and the A64 is built. What is the point? This is not a road with a bad bend that gives bad visibility. This is tinkering for the sake of it. Surely there are more 2 important things on which to spend the cash. 3 I think the parking is fine where it is and provides more spaces for short-term shopping. 4 But I think that moving the parking is utterly pointless It is difficult to see how movingparking across the street at the top end of road improves things at the bottom. A lot of money. enforce tighter 5 restrictions on parking outside the bays. These were resurfaced in stone not many years ago. Altering car parking to the other side of Wheelgate would not make a significant 6 difference. 7 Can motorists be encouraged to park only in the direction of travel? 8 Absolutely no advantage in moving parking. Would result in few spaces. No problem with visibility at Butcher Corner. 9 Very difficult crossing at the moment. Many people cross there 10 Consefuation paving may be a luxury we can't afford. 11 Broadly supportive particularly of improved pavements. 12 Will cause more congestion than already exists until improvements are made at the York end of bypass. 13 Do not approve of lane reduction at Castlegate. Change to parking not needed. 14 Not a priority when funds are limited. 15 Need for enforcement of parkign rules. Restrict vehicle deliveries to shops before 10am or after 4pm. 16 Far too expensive and would reduce the area available for parking. 17 Unnecessary 18 Waste of money. Unnecessary 19 Very expensive 20 Widen footpaths and prevent loading/unloading hours. Leave parking on eastern side. 21 Waste of time and money especially after recent resurgacing. Leave two lanes in Castlegate. 22 Strongly disagree - total waste of money 23 I see no reason to spend money on unecessary improvements 24 IOther plans shown should remove the problems existing. 25 The curent system works ok. 26 How can you relly think of using £360k moving parking area from one side of road to the other. Use money to keep Norton library open. 27 Completely uncessary. Total waste of money. 28 not a priority 29 Put all money into N1 30 No reason for doing this. Waste of money. 31 I cannot see how this will improve Butchers Corner and in the 'austere' times that the cost is justified. 32 it works as it is. 33 Leave things as they are but offset the traffic lights. 34 Not wider paths 35 Keep parking as it is at present

RDC3b_comment - Yorkersgate 1 Not necessary. As a main thoroughfare into and out of Malton, especially for residents in Norton and the east side of Malton, impeding the flow of traffic is 2 probably an error. It's slow enough as it is. 3 Pedestrian crossing should go ahead as a minimum as facilities are limited on this busy road. 4 It has never struck me that the pavement was in a bad state. 5 except for new pedestrian crossing 6 Total waste of money and would result in vibration to buildings. 7 Better for pedestrians 8 Improved surfaces welcome and the pedestrian crossing is desperately needed. 9 Not a priority. 10 Raised footpaths across access roads would be good for prams and wheelchairs. new paving not a necessity. 11 Yes to pedestrian crossing. Raised footpaths are not a big deal. 12 Minimal benefits at excessive cost. 13 Unnecessary expenditure 14 Not cost effective 15 Waste of money. Unnecessary. 16 Pedestrian crossing needed at Water Lane but improved paving not justified. 17 Do it now. Crossing Yorkersgate is an accident waiting to happen. 18 Again strongly disagree - unnecessary waste of money 19 The current system works ok. 20 As the main entry into Malto it is about time it was cleaned up. 21 Minimal impact. Not a priority. Can not be justified. 22 not a priority 23 Pelican crossing only otherwise longest traffic. 24 Although if the pedestrian crossing is controlled by lights it may cause extra congestion. 25 Pedestrian crossing is unhelpful also get rid of inappropriate road signs. 26 Nothing wrong with it. 27 Yes to pedestrian crossing but no to raised footpath. I can only see them complicating life. 28 Not raised footways across roads

RDC4_comment - Any other coments to make about these ideas? Why is so much money being spent on Malton - again? Would it not be more sensible to look at ways of encouraging people to come into Malton instead of making it harder which is more likely to encourage out of town shopping? And why is there NO emphasis on 1 encouraging green transport - such as a cycling route along the B1257? Lets see pot holes properly repaired and a better enforced turnover of the 2 hour parking in the centre of Malton and maybe there would not be so many grumbles about shopping here. Comments already listed. I think is is a serious mistake to route more traffic via Castlegate (residential, with Morrisons & the butchers 2 corner traffic) in preference to Railway street (not residential, wider, less popular stores). 3 Don't waste money! Current systems are fine 4 no 5 Any proposals must enhance and not restrict the routes for buses and cyclists 6 Like the recent lash up in commercial street norton, nothing is any better.money wasted, so B-off and leave Malton alone. 7 Parking on the other side of Wheelgate should alleviate the congestion at the traffic lights due to vehicles parking on the double yellow lines. Mostly consultant led madness. Ger rid of through traffic by providing interchanges at both ends of town and the rest will look after itself 8 apart from cosmetics. 9 Funding it all may be an issue not wanting to see the council tax going up! 10 It would be good to see a more ambitions level of pedestrianisation in the market place. It is essential that speed bumps are made down Bazeleys Lane before someone/horses are killed. High bumps that will force drivers to 11 slow down! 12 Strongly agree with partial one way traffic on Norton Road. 13 Think you're living in cockoo land. The changes are a mixture of sense and nonsense. The ideal solution is a bridge over the rail like! The proposals for Castlegate and area 14 in Q3 are simply wasting public money. Anything to make life easier for the elderly would be an improvement. In the recent past I had to push my mother in a wheelchair - what a 15 nightmare!! I can walk into town but need to rest somewhere before walkign hack home with shopping. I am not alone! Congestion is made worse at present because parkign rules are widely disregarded in the absence of effective enforcement. Commercisl 16 delivery vehicles loading/unloading in Wheelgate make matters worse. Morrisons car park needs another exit/entrance to red 17 No change to traffic flow - turning east and west of traffic lights. 18 No Ans If and when you alter the design of the Market place study is would be most beneficial to do Option 1 and make the Market Place a place to 19 be proud of. 20 The 20mph zone should also include Mill St Norton. On street parking should be banned at all times on Mill Street Norton. The 20mph zone should also include Mill Street Norton. The amount of on street parkign on Mill Street should be reduced so giving clearer 21 views at the junctions along it. No parking outside the Hyde Park except in the car park. M: Strongly disagree with proposed removal of one traffic lane Castlegate approach to traffic lights. This will cause more congestion. 22 Disagree with new planting it. It constricts road space. 23 HGV ban in Railway St amd Norton Rd is sufficient. The one way plan for Norton Rd is a bad idea! 24 The biggest waste of money. Money could be spend on more important things like a bypass for Rillington 25 No Ans 26 We believe better to maintain existing investment then money in serve for future. Pendign final decision on future of Cattle market and Wentworth St carpark plans for Market Place must make good provisions for car 27 parking. 28 If there is to be a pedestrian area it should be on the north side as it is the sunniest/warmets. The south side is always in shade. Yes. Think outside the box. Strike a deal with First Trans Pennine Express for a new footbridge and platform at Malton Rail Station to be 29 paid for by the councils whilst they pay for more railway to deliver a half hour service to Scarborough - York thus h Market St us in urgent need of total resurfacing. Much more important than any expenditure in areas such as 30 Newbiggin/Wheelgate/Yorkersgate 31 Roads which most meed resurfacing is market street. 32 Total rubbish 33 Í am a resident of Malton and surprised to see that some business in Malton are not even aware of the proposals?? Why? Malton is only unable to cope with excess people and cars once a year when the Food and Drink festival is on. The rest of the year it 34 is fine. 35 Opinion N1 As sun has more impact this side (opinion N2 more in the shade). It must be this option. 36 If no shared space parking restrictions must be enforced ie. yellow lines 37 Please clean the streets. Autumn leaves down York Rd are now TWO years old. Very poor management. 38 I agree with the idea of some pedestrianisation but the traffic still has to be able to flow. 39 Some ridiculous ideas. Coordination with future plans for Market needed 40 In these difficult times I cannot believe that we are even considering changing a system which is basically OK. Access to the A64 from York Road Industrial Estate needs to be improved so lorries and other vehicles head to Scarborough/Old Malton 41 and Pickering/Brambling fields without needing to go through Malton itself. Malton SCTS Web March 11 No AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No AnsNo Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans # QA QB QD QE QF QG QH QI QJ QK QL QM SCTS_comments RDC1 RDC1_comment RDC2a_comment RDC2a RDC2b_comment RDC2b RDC3a_comment RDC3a RDC3b_comment RDC3b RDC4_comment Age Gender Disability Ethnicity Postcode_1 Postcode_2 I think the A64 needs all Junctions improving along with the Broughton road Junction to give access to and from the A64 from the B1257 which would ease traffic in malton, also I support the B1257 Amotherby to A170 1 24143432333 1 Kirkby mills route study thats a busy road with 1 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 2 No Ans 1985 1 2 1 YO62 6 I welcome the improvements to (1) Brambling Fields junction and (2) HGV ban at the level crossing ( except for access ). Some of the associated " one way" proposals are less appealing and not necessarily tied to the N3, including Saville Street and St Michael 2 21331332113 4 success of 1 and 2. Some of proposed "one 3 Street. No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1960 1 2 1 YO17 No Ans The only thing I don't agree with is banning HGV's in malton town centre for example what route is a HGV fuel tanker meant to take from hull to BATA at Amotherby it can only pass through norton and malton via castlegate and wheelgate! If all Junctions on the A64 malton bypass were all movement including a B1257 Junction then HGV's could be banned 3 23134433234 1 but you are not providing another route for 2 No Ans No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1960 1 2 1 YO17 7 both streets need improving but All the malton bypass Junctions need will still have heavy traffic until 4 24142542234 1 improving, B1257 and York road 1 No Ans this would slow traffic and be more natural looking1 as above 1 a Junction between the B1257 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1956 2 No Ans 1 YO60 6 5 32132332233 1 HadNo Ans to tick box because I support Brambling 1 IfNo you Ans are going to interfere with the Market No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 WhyNo Ans is so much money being spent on 1986 1 2 1 yo62 6 Fields - however, totally against the Place then please change the flow of traffic Malton - again? Would it not be more "complementary measures". To say you have along Saville Street to make it an EXIT from sensible to look at ways of encouraging to have both as a total package is akin to a the Market Place. Market Street is not a wide people to come into Malton instead of bribe/threat. Making use of these roads more enough junction to carry all that traffic which making it harder which is more likely to difficult than now is likely to drive people away will have to exit using this if you prevent encourage out of town shopping? And from Malton and will only move the air quality traffic using Spital Street. But fully agree with why is there NO emphasis on problems further along the respective roads. one way up Finkle Street and one way down What is the point? This is not encouraging green transport - such as a The air quality at Butcher Corner wants Spital Street. If we have to have some sort of a road with a bad bend that cycling route along the B1257? Lets see improving by improving the drains! Why on pedestrianised area I would prefer N2 but with gives bad visibility. This is pot holes properly repaired and a better earth can we not simply have a weight two way traffic along Market Place. And why Isin't it already shared space? tinkering for the sake of it. enforced turnover of the 2 hour parking restriction to force heavy vehicles to use the are we doing Continental driving from Finkle Make Saville Street NO PARKING Who uses the footpaths? But Surely there are more in the centre of Malton and maybe there by pass instead of this hammer to crack a nut Street to Saville Street? Against the shared except for deliveries before 9.30am there is no traffic on here during important things on which to would not be so many grumbles about No 6 11335552353 No Ansattitude? And why waste money at a time 4 space - too many possible dangers and we and after 4pm. And ENFORCE it. 2 daytime. No Ans spend the cash. 2 No Ans 1 shopping here. Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans There needs to be a further solution to the I think this is a lovely option and would be a problem of increased traffic over the railway huge improvement for Malton, but I am not crossing once all the proposed houses in convinced of the need for two-way traffic flow Norton have been built - this does not go far to the car-parks up Market Street. Also there I think the parking is fine where enough although it is a much-needed should be no parking allowed at any time on it is and provides more spaces 7 1 1 241 1 11 No Ans 2 5 1 improvement for access from the bypass. 1 Saville Street and St Michael Street should be I think that it is a nice idea but in reality too dange2rous. No Ans 2 for short-term shopping. 2 Not necessary. 2 No Ans 1964 2 2 1 YO17 9 8 2 3 No AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo Ans 2 2 2 No Ans 1 No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1964 2 2 1 yo18 No Ans 9 32152552125 2 No Ans 2 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1975 2 2 1 YO62 6 Traffic calming should not include speed bumps(or whatever one calls them) rumble strips should be used instead. Speed bumps 10 23352222221 1 cause damage to tyres in some cases and 4 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1931 1 2 1 YO17 8 11 24134323325 1 No Ans 3 No Ans No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 2 No Ans 1948 1 2 1 yo17 7 12 11222112221 1 I think the work should be done asap 1 Please leave parking for disabled No a very busy street for cars 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1950 1 1 1 YO17 8 A64 Brambling fields interchange, consider an extra road south, linking to Beverly Rd, taking traffic out of Norton, or extend road past Without change the town keeps it traditional bacon factory to link in.40 mph sign required appeal and looks oldish, interesting orginal 13 4 2 2 2 No AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo Ansnear to Mile post, north side of Great Barugh, 4 layout. Changes would detract from appeal. No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1948 1 2 1 YO41 No Ans 14 32133322224 2 No Ans 1 No Ans No Ans 1 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1978 2 1 1 yo62 6 15 12152444235 1 No Ans 1 No Ans No Ans 1 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1986 1 2 1 yo17 6 16 23242332234 2 No Ans 4 No Ans No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1946 1 No Ans 1 yo17 7 17 22134323323 3 No Ans 1 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 2 No Ans 1955 2 1 1 yo62 6 I would Just like to comment on the A170 Kirkbymoorside to B1257 Amotherby route study this something that is a must I use that road daily and feel for the people that live in Marton, Normanby, Great Barugh and Amotherby the speed limits are Just abused and need enforcing in a better way its a busy route! also bends need better signing and sections where its unsafe to overtake need double white lines! the fact is with that route is that it will only get busier as its such a short 18 22143332223 1 way to malton with the only other route via 4 No Ans No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1952 1 2 1 Yo17 7 Entirely agree with improvements to I prefer N2 with the south side of the market Brambling Fields junction, and to increasing square pedestrianised, although I would also pedestrian safety at Butcher Corner. However include the area outside the milton rooms, St As a main thoroughfare into and Comments already listed. I think is is a suggested one-way on Railway street will be a Michael Street and Saville Street, leaving the out of Malton, especially for serious mistake to route more traffic via total disaster, requiring all vehicles to get Northern edge accessible to traffic. Would be better to close to vehicles Would be better to close to residents in Norton and the east Castlegate (residential, with Morrisons & caught up in both the Butcher Corner traffic Alternatively I would pedestrianise the whole except for access. However shared vehicles except for access. side of Malton, impeding the flow the butchers corner traffic) in preference lights and Morrisons traffic. Since railway of the market square and re-route the traffic space better than current However shared space better than of traffic is probably an error. It's to Railway street (not residential, wider, 19 25332424423 1 street is not a residential area, I don't see why 2 entirely via Yorkersgate, arrangements! 2 current arrangements! 2 But I think that moving the parking is utterly1 slowpointless enough as it is. 2 less popular stores). 1976 2 2 1 yo17 No Ans 20 22212222221 2 No Ans 2 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1972 2 2 1 YO17 8 The lowering of teh speed limit in luttons and helperthorpe is essential. Children have to cross the road to get to school busses and the current speed of vehicles often peeks at 60+ mph with vehicles hitting higher speeds at What a waste of money, the current system 21 44312552221 2 kicking out time from the Blue Bell pub in 4 works fine. No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 Don't waste money! Current systems are fine1973 1 2 1 yo17 8 22 No AnsNo AnsNo Ans 1 No AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo Ans 1 2 No Ans 4 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1969 2 2 1 yo17 8 23 No AnsNo AnsNo Ans 1 No AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo Ans 1 2 No Ans 4 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1968 2 2 1 yo17 8 Please note - re: L Footway improvements Luttons - Butterwick The only shop accessible without a car from Weaverthorpe is at 24 33313333331 1 Butterwick and the footpath has all but 4 No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans 1951 2 2 1 YO17 8 25 33313333331 1 No Ans 4 No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans 1947 1 2 1 YO17 8 26 22132332223 2 No Ans 1 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1960 2 2 1 YO62 6 27 33313333331 1 No Ans 4 No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans 1945 1 1 1 YO17 8 28 22312333321 2 No Ans 4 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 no 1946 1 2 1 yo17 8 29 32323333331 3 No Ans 4 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1960 2 2 1 yo17 8 30 22312223331 3 No Ans 4 No Ans No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1987 2 2 1 yo17 8 31 44323333331 4 No Ans 4 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1957 1 2 1 yo17 8 32 32313333331 3 No Ans 4 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1989 1 2 1 yo17 8 33 42313333331 3 No Ans 4 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1917 2 1 1 yo17 8 34 33313333331 3 No Ans 4 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1967 1 2 1 yo17 8 35 33313333331 3 No Ans 4 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1971 2 1 1 yo17 8 The wolds valley urgently needs footpatch improvements, also the 30 mph speed 36 3 2 3 1 2 3 No Ans 3 3 3 1 2 restrictions, increased use by HGV / tractors No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans 1951 2 2 1 YO17 8 37 23313332331 1 No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans 1941 1 2 1 YO17 8 38 33313332331 2 No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans 1941 2 2 1 YO17 8 39 24413322221 2 No Ans 1 No Ans No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1958 2 2 1 YO17 8 40 33313333331 1 No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1963 2 2 1 Yo17 8 41 24152332225 1 No Ans 1 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1971 1 2 1 yo17 6 42 33313323331 3 No Ans 4 No Ans No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1951 1 2 1 yo17 8 43 23323322321 3 No Ans 4 No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans 1946 2 1 1 yo17 8 44 32312332221 2 No Ans 4 No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans 1968 2 2 1 yo17 8 45 33313333331 2 No Ans 4 No Ans No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1957 2 No Ans 1 yo17 8 Is there a need for additional slips at the east N1 offers greater benefit than N2 and should It is difficult to see how end of the bypass to cater for hgv traffic from help frame a greater area of the market movingparking across the Pedestrian crossing should go the coast that will be prevented from square than N2. N3 is likely to result in a street at the top end of road ahead as a minimum as facilities 46 23332213323 1 accessing the industrial units on the east of 1 jumble of cars and people although No Ans 1 No Ans 1 improves things at the bottom. 2 are limited on this busy road. 1 No Ans 1963 1 2 1 YO17 9 47 22143444434 1 No Ans 4 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1984 2 2 3 yo17 7 48 32133332223 2 No Ans 2 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1985 1 2 No Ans yo62 6 The damage to the road surface from the Luttons to Foxholes is at danger levels and 49 33313333331 1 any one of the potholes could cause serious No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans 1942 1 2 1 YO17 8 50 2 2 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 2 3 2 No Ans 1 No Ans No Ans 1 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1956 2 2 1 yo17 6 51 2 2 1 5 2 4 3 3 3 2 5 1 No Ans 1 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1974 2 1 3 yo17 6 No 52 2 2 Ans 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 No Ans 4 No Ans No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1946 1 2 1 YO17 8 i live in butterwick next village to weaverthorpe were you can break your ankle just by walking down the foot path because of tree roots and the general disrepair. our village has no speed limit but has had more fatal smashes than any. we would like a wieght limit put on the road from skedhills down to butterwick as we are getting a lot of 53 33313333331 3 hgvs using it as a short cut for driffield i and 4 No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans 1971 1 2 1 yo17 8 54 2 3 1 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 B1257 needs link to A64 to get traffic out of 4 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 2 No Ans 1985 1 2 1 YO62 6 No No No No An No No No No No 55 3 1 3 2 Ans Ans Ans s Ans Ans Ans Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans I can see that the Brambling Fields Interchange woud help reduce the number of HGVs in Malton to some extent. But I doubt if car numbers would decrease greatly. Overall traffic reduction measures encouraging people These were resurfaced in stone to walk, cycle and take public transport would not many years ago. Altering be far less costly and would certainly result in Yes - but only if current vehicle car parking to the other side of improved air quality. This consultation does restrictions (ie access only) still Wheelgate would not make a It has never struck me that the 56 31325322232 4 not include the £135,000 scheme to upgrade 1 No Ans Yes - so long as no parking 1 apply. 1 significant difference. 2 pavement was in a bad state. 2 No Ans 1946 2 1 1 YO17 6 The whole strategy will not properly address the issue of reducing traffic. There should be much more emphasis on better provisions for public transport & cycling. The Brambling Fields scheme WILL reduce the number of HGVs from the west having to go through the centre to get to Norton & the south BUT there is still a massive volume of traffic heading north through the town either onto the To the North & South of Market Place widen A169 or the B1257. I fear that the increasing pavements, restrict road to single width and use of SatNavs is directing traffic along these prevent parking, change & raise road surface routes. This makes cycling along the B1257 to indicate a pedestrian priority. St Michaels & for instance far more dangerous and I am Saville streets to be shared spaces with new No furious that you can consider works to the little level surface, no parking and vehicles for except for new pedestrian Any proposals must enhance and not 57 3 2 225 3 222 Ans 2 4 used pavements on Showfield Lane whilst No Ans access only. see previous comment 1 see previous comment 1 No Ans 2 crossing 2 restrict the routes for buses and cyclists 1951 1 2 1 YO17 6

58 3 3 3 1 3 3 33 3 3 1 2No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans 1983 1 2 1 yo17 8 We need footpaths that can be used to walk from our village to Weaverthrope and Lttuns wihtout having to go in the road (bugy /disabled use only possible on road) Traffic is 59 33313333331 3 fast and there are many more large lorries No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans 1943 1 2 1 yo17 8 The stupid idea to remove one traffic lane at the traffic lights in castlegate will only increase Like the recent lash up in commercial congestion and could only have been Leave it all alone .There is nothing wrong with street norton, nothing is any proposed by a university educated dimwit who the system as it is. Stop wasting public money better.money wasted, so B-off and leave 60 55335552233 5 knows nothing about Malton,congestion,or life 4 Sack all the stupid consultants. No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 Malton alone. 1935 1 2 1 YO17 7 61 3 2 1 5 2 3 2 2 2 2 5 1 No Ans 1 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1947 1 2 1 Yo17 7 Please can the route syudy on the road between Amotherby and Kirkby mills be done as its so important I live at normanby and we suffer very high traffic speeds in our 30 zone and other actions are needed along the route to help stop accidents at bends and so on we have not got a problem with traffic using the 62 22132222223 1 road as its the main link from kirkby to Malton 4 No Ans No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1985 1 2 1 YO62 6 I don't agree with the removal of a traffic lane Can motorists be encouraged Parking on the other side of Wheelgate in Castlegate at Butcher corner. All traffic to park only in the direction of should alleviate the congestion at the 63 41222321111 2 would be held up by vehicles waiting to turn 3 No Ans If it remains a one way street 1 If it remains a one way street 1 travel? 1 No Ans 1 traffic lights due to vehicles parking on 1950 2 2 1 Yo17 7 64 5 1 5 5 2 4 3 1 4 4 3 4 No Ans 3 No Ans No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1951 1 2 1 YO17 7 Interchange itself is urgently needed. Other Mostly consultant led madness. Ger rid associated works except resurfacing are of through traffic by providing 1 55532542422 5 totally unnecessary. 4 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 interchanges at both ends of town and 1952 2 2 1 YO17 6 REmoval of one lane in Castlegate will result Absolutely no advantage in in longer queus as traffic turning right will be All schemes a total waste of money no moving parking. Would result unable to get out of the way of traffic wanting advantages but create difficulties. Option N1 in few spaces. No problem with Total waste of money and would 2 35125543323 1 to go straight on. Will be unneccessary if 30% 4 especially stupid. No Ans 2 No Ans 2 visibility at Butcher Corner. 2 result in vibration to buildings. 2 No Ans 1951 2 2 1 YO17 6 Concern re lots of traffic lane on Castlegate will lead to longer queues approaching lights. 3 21131321213 2 Mill Street very unsatisfactory as part of 1 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1943 1 2 1 YO17 7 4 5 1 No AnsNo Ans 5 5 51115 1 No Ans 4 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1944 1 2 1 YO17 7 5 23314433331 2 No Ans 3 No Ans No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1943 1 2 1 YO17 8 Safety reasons more people should walk that Better for pedestrians more spaces as many Many cars and vans park on footpaths Safer for pedestrians who use it as Very difficult crossing at the 6 11211121111 1 using their cars but not safe at the moment. 1 shops have goods outside their shops. so have to walk in road. 2 a cut through 2 moment. Many people cross 1 Better for pedestrians 1 No Ans 1945 2 1 1 YO17 7 An awareness and publicity campaign shoud The north sie of the square is [?] for the be aimed al local haughliers eg Deans sunniest to set ie relax in. Also it would [?] the 7 11322321111 1 Distribution Whatts Ian Moset etc highlighting 1 least disruption although there would be the No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1947 1 2 1 YO17 7 8 2 2 No AnsNo Ans 4 4 32443 2 No Ans 3 No Ans No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1949 1 2 1 YO17 7 I disagree strongly with arrangements at Butcher Corner. Traffic moving up Castlegate to turn to Pickering will block the other traffic Consefuation paving may be a Funding it all may be an issue not 9 11243312223 2 to Helmsley because of the flow of traffic 1 No Ans No Ans 1 No Ans 1 luxury we can't afford. 1 No Ans 1 wanting to see the council tax going up! 1954 1 2 1 YO17 9 I strongly support the Norton Road element Option N1 is attractive but better still would be But I would much prefer it to be fully Prefer acccess only and full Improved surfaces welcome and It would be good to see a more which would massively improve pedestrian N1 plus N2 the setting of the church would be pesedtrianised particularly on market pedestrianisation as above. Broadly supportive particularly the pedestrian crossing is ambitions level of pedestrianisation in 10 1 1 No AnsNo Ans 1 1 11111 1 and cycle links betweek the towns. I'm less 1 vastly improved by removing parked cars. days and during shopping hours 1 Shared space is dangerous for 1 of improved pavements. 1 desperately needed. 1 the market place. 1958 1 2 1 YO17 9 It is essential that speed bumps are made down Bazeleys Lane before 11 31335114543 1 No Ans 1 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 someone/horses are killed. High bumps 1945 1 1 1 YO17 9 12 23332231233 1 No Ans 1 No Ans Let us have one thing or the other 2 ditto [let us have one thing or the 2 No Ans 1 Not a priority. 1 No Ans 1925 1 2 1 YO17 7 13 No AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo Ans 2 3 31133 1 Do Brambling Fields interchanges then do 4 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1934 1 1 1 YO17 7 Why no a vailability to comment on proposals for Butchers Corner/Castlegate? I strongly 14 22222212222 1 disagree with the signing of traffic in 2 No Ans No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1941 1 2 1 YO17 7 Until such time as improvements are made to Will cause more congestion western end of bypass traffic from the east wil than already exists until Strongly agree with partial one way 15 24333222233 2 lstill use the town centre. Also traffic from 4 No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans improvements are made at the 2 No Ans 2 traffic on Norton Road. 1930 1 2 1 YO17 No Ans 16 42332422443 2 No Ans 4 No Ans No Ans 2 What about the market stalls? 2 No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans Think you're living in cockoo land. 1947 2 2 1 YO17 7 Strongly agree with A64 interchange. The changes are a mixture of sense and However not sure about Norton Rd alterations Do not approve of lane nonsense. The ideal solution is a bridge as it means Norton residents going home from Improve pavement and stop the illegal reduction at Castlegate. over the rail like! The proposals for 17 12233332223 1 station will have to use Wells Lane/Butchers 2 No Ans parking! 2 No Ans 2 Change to parking not needed. 2 No Ans 2 Castlegate and area in Q3 are simply 1942 1 2 1 YO17 7 18 22332331233 2 No Ans 4 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1934 2 1 1 YO17 7 19 32332331233 2 Stop parking in Saville Street. 4 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1961 2 2 1 YO17 7 The road on Showfield Lane is in need of 20 3 5 No AnsNo Ans 5 5 31233 2 repair. Horse walk on Langton Rd should be 4 No Ans No Ans 1 No Ans 2 No Ans No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 1946 1 2 1 YO17 7 21 12111221113 2 No Ans 2 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1954 2 2 1 YO17 8 Anything to make life easier for the Brambling Fields interchange giving access to More attractive traffic - free area for sitting Raised footpaths across access elderly would be an improvement. In the Norton for eastbound A64 heavy traffic would and relaxing . Neither Malton of Norton has roads would be good for prams recent past I had to push my mother in a surely solve other traffic problems in the anywhere for wheelchair users of people with Not a priority when funds are and wheelchairs. new paving not wheelchair - what a nightmare!! I can 22 2 1 No AnsNo Ans 1 1 13323 1 towns. 1 small children to sit away from traffic. No Ans 2 No Ans 2 limited. 2 a necessity. 2 walk into town but need to rest 1939 2 1 1 YO17 7 Congestion is made worse at present Need for enforcement of because parkign rules are widely This must be the highest priority with effective As N1 but only allow southbound traffic on parkign rules. Restrict vehicle Yes to pedestrian crossing. disregarded in the absence of effective enforcement against HGV at level crossing east side of Market place at present. Two way No parking to be tolerated in St. M deliveries to shops before Raised footpaths are not a big enforcement. Commercisl delivery 23 21332342223 1 and Railway St. 1 is too hazardous. No parking to be tolerated in Savile St. 2 St 2 10am or after 4pm. 1 deal. 1 vehicles loading/unloading in Wheelgate 1938 1 2 1 YO17 7 Where do we comment on traffic flow at No change to traffic flow - turning east 24 22222222222 2 No Ans 4 Butchers Corner. I suggest NO CHANGE No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 and west of traffic lights. 1932 1 2 1 YO17 1 25 21323333322 1 No Ans 1 No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans 1 No Ans No Ans No Ans 1954 1 2 1 YO17 8 If and when you alter the design of the Why has this taken so long when we all know Market place study is would be most 26 12232322222 1 what needed doing years ago? 1 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 beneficial to do Option 1 and make the 1937 2 2 1 YO17 7 27 2 No Ans 332431113 2 The Brambling Fields scheme could be silved 1 No Ans No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1936 1 1 1 YO60 7 If finance is limited scheme M and its All other options appear to create more As the average age of the population Far too expensive and would Minimal benefits at excessive The 20mph zone should also include 28 11331212342 1 associated measures should have priority 4 problems then they would solve. rises the dangers of shared space 2 No Ans 2 reduce the area available for 2 cost. 2 Mill St Norton. On street parking should 1945 1 2 1 YO17 9 The 20mph zone should also include Butcher Corner traffic lights should be Mill Street Norton. The amount of on replaced to operate in the same way as those All other options seem to create more street parkign on Mill Street should be 29 21331211231 1 at Newbiggin/The Mount junction. 4 problems No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 reduced so giving clearer views at the 1944 2 2 1 YO17 9 For the scheme to work as a whole the present restriction on turning right from the bridge on to Norton Rd MUST be enforced. 30 2 1 No AnsNo Ans 1 5 11112 1 Currently no one seems to be able to enforce 4 No Ans No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1944 1 2 1 YO17 9 It would improve the appearance of the 31 2 No AnsNo AnsNo Ans 2 3 34223 2 No Ans 1 Market Place and be more pedestrian friendly. No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1937 2 2 1 YO17 7 The upgrade of Brambling Fields is now less A type of 'shared space' arrangement is used M: Strongly disagree with proposed priority owing to decreased bacon factory by motorists and pedestrians at the awkward Traffic is already slow in Market Place removal of one traffic lane Castlegate traffic. Consideration should be given to other level crossing junction! People adapt very and approach road so shared space approach to traffic lights. This will cause 32 24234413333 2 A64 junctions also. 3 well to such a situation. option would be a natural progression. 1 No Ans 1 Unnecessary 2 Unnecessary expenditure 2 more congestion. Disagree with new 1949 2 2 1 YO17 9 This supposed to be restricted 33 1 1 No AnsNo Ans 4 4 32213 1 No Ans 1 Option 1 Plus more disabled parking. No Ans 1 entry but this is not observed. The 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1929 1 2 No Ans YO17 No Ans Re. Removal of traffic lange Examples of above - not much Castlegate/Butchers Corner. Unless traffic traffic so pedestrians often walk in light sequence is changed eg. to one road a Unsafe - a road means cars so the road so unprepared for moving 34 1 1 No AnsNo Ans 2 3 11113 1 time cars/vehicles wishing to turn right to Old 1 No Ans pedestrians are aware of traffic. 2 vehicles. 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1947 2 2 1 YO17 9 35 2 4 No AnsNo Ans 2 5 31113 1 No Ans 1 Prefer with option 1 with ample provision for Long overdue 1 Long overdue 1 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1945 1 1 1 YO17 No Ans 36 1 1 2 1 2 No Ans 22 2 1 2 1 No Ans 1 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1960 1 2 1 YO14 0 Some proposals are expensive and of But the parkign places lost must be replaced HGV ban in Railway St amd Norton Rd 37 24444342223 1 marginal value. But the main thrust - in Malton 1 by using the cattle market area more No room for this. 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 Not cost effective 2 is sufficient. The one way plan for 1953 1 2 1 YO60 7 A complete waste of money. Like the so To stop spending money things that are not The biggest waste of money. Money 38 35555522453 5 called improvements to Norton footpaths. 4 goign to help Malton bring in tourists. Waste of money. Unnecessary No Ans Waste of money. Unnecessary No Ans Waste of money. Unnecessary No Ans Waste of money. Unnecessary. No Ans could be spend on more important 1946 2 2 No Ans YO17 8 Money could be spent better elsewehere so 39 24333412253 5 filling pot homes in and resurfacing rods in the 4 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans YO17 8 These expensive measures just move Before this would be effective premises need We believe better to maintain existing congestion. Helmsley junction to A64 would attention ensuring viable business and investment then money in serve for 40 42424524425 5 be more greater benefit for much lower cost. 4 sustainable environment. Do not want focus No Ans 2 No Ans 2 Very expensive 1 No Ans 2 future. No Ans 1 2 1 YO62 4 The junction of Wells Lane and Castlegate it Pendign final decision on future of is clearly difficult to turn right from Wells Lane NW side of Market Place gets all the sun in Widen footpaths and prevent Pedestrian crossing needed at Cattle market and Wentworth St carpark because of traffic backed from the Railway preference to N2 for pedestrians. N3 offer This is already congested and vehicles Complicated by library whose loading/unloading hours. Leave Water Lane but improved paving plans for Market Place must make good 41 24443321323 1 crossing and the entrance/exit to Morrisons 1 very limited parking. mount pavement. 2 future is not know. 2 parking on eastern side. 2 not justified. 2 provisions for car parking. 1922 1 1 No Ans YO17 9 I strongly support the Brambling Fields Two way traffic outside Hoppers would be Widen pavements and prevent If there is to be a pedestrian area it interchange but think the changes in access to dangerous. Parking on the south side of the parking. Existing parking restrictions should be on the north side as it is the Railway St and Norton Rd are unworkable. Market Place (even blue badge) causes are not enforced which results in Retain existing vehicle bad but it sunniest/warmets. The south side is 42 22222221112 No AnsThey do need resurfacing badly. The removal 4 obstructions to larger vehicles. vehicles mounting the pavement. 2 must be enforced. 1 No Ans 2 No Ans No Ans always in shade. 1946 1 1 1 YO17 7 Whilst is is possible to walk pretty much Yes. Think outside the box. Strike a deal adjacent to the A64 from the York Rd Waste of time and money with First Trans Pennine Express for a entrance to the Malton Eden Camp there especially after recent new footbridge and platform at Malton should also be a footpath from the Pickering Any seating on new pedestrian area needs to resurgacing. Leave two lanes in Do it now. Crossing Yorkersgate Rail Station to be paid for by the 43 15331331113 1 Road to the New Ship road proposed at 1 look down on [?] not up! No Ans 2 No Ans 2 Castlegate. 2 is an accident waiting to happen. 1 councils whilst they pay for more railway No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans YO17 7 I seriously agree with the A64 Brambling it is vital that there should ne NO reduction in Market St us in urgent need of total Fields interchange. However I strongly parking spaces for cars as well as maximum resurfacing. Much more important than disagree with the Butchers Corner/Castlegate flexibility for access otherwise shoppers such Strongly disagree - total waste Again strongly disagree - any expenditure in areas such as 44 4 3 334 3 4 No Ans 1 4 3 No Anstraffic lane removed. I have no views 4 as me will be driven away from Malton No Ans 2 No Ans 2 of money 2 unnecessary waste of money 2 Newbiggin/Wheelgate/Yorkersgate 1939 2 2 1 YO60 7 A: No need to improve pavements. Agree one way. M: Strongly agree Brambling Fields. Strongly disagree with removing one lane at Need for traffic to obtain access to shops and Roads which most meed resurfacing is 45 53335553353 5 Castlegate Butchers Corner as this will cause 4 need for parking. No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 market street. 1935 1 2 1 YO60 7 Removal of one traffic lane at Butchers 46 5 2 1 2 2 No Ans 4 2 No Ans 5 3 5 Corner is a no brainer. The back up of traffic 2 Leave it as it is. No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 Total rubbish No Ans 2 2 No Ans YO17 9 Whilst the junction has always been needed I have no problem with shared space but if I see no reason to spend 47 42123242123 4 the package of works is not accessable. 3 this proved impossible then leave the No Ans 1 No Ans 1 money on unecessary 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1944 1 2 1 YO17 9 I have always opposed the opening up to I have encountered no serious problems and IOther plans shown should 48 22222252222 2 traffic of Bazleys Lane. Much used by 4 have lived here all my life (72 years) Could be dangerous to pedestrians 2 No Ans 2 remove the problems existing. 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1939 1 2 1 YO17 9 Option N1 would give an attractive amenuty area in a bright and sunny part of the market 49 32333222333 1 No Ans 1 place. The pavement cafes would add to the No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1958 2 2 1 YO17 9 50 32332221123 1 No Ans 1 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1956 1 2 1 YO17 9 Removing the 2 lanes to one at Butcher Why can we not do both N1 and N2?? With Í am a resident of Malton and surprised 51 12334522223 2 Corner from Castlegate should be removed 1 two way traffic either side Traffic and pedestrians - disaster 2 No Ans 2 The curent system works ok. 2 The current system works ok. 2 to see that some business in Malton are 1965 1 2 1 YO17 7 52 32232231113 2 No Ans 4 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1942 1 1 1 YO17 No Ans 53 11234532445 1 No Ans 1 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1948 1 2 1 YO17 6 HGV's coming into the town from Beverly Why? Malton is only unable to cope with Buttercrambe and Thirsk will still come via excess people and cars once a year 54 32334251123 2 existing routes. Therefore the plan will only go 4 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 when the Food and Drink festival is on. 1965 1 2 1 YO17 9 more transportation consideration for Norton. How can you relly think of using Look at St Nicholas St. Paths damaged by £360k moving parking area Opinion N1 As sun has more impact this HGV's when Commercial St was being re- As you suggest danger for hard of from one side of road to the As the main entry into Malto it is side (opinion N2 more in the shade). It 55 No AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo Ans 1 No AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo Ans 1 piped (water). Bazeleys Lane to Whitewall 1 No Ans No Change 2 hearign etc. 2 other. Use money to keep 2 about time it was cleaned up. 1 must be this option. 1947 No Ans 2 1 YO17 No Ans 56 4 5 No AnsNo Ans 2 2 22123 2 No Ans 4 Options show lack of understanding. No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1937 1 2 1 YO60 No Ans Essential that a weight restriction order is N3 but with pedestrian only in St Michaels St But not in St Michaels St which should Very narrow. Should be pedestrian Completely uncessary. Total Minimal impact. Not a priority. 57 2 2 No AnsNo Ans 3 2 42 No AnsNo Ans 2 2 imposed. Also improve 20mph zone to slow 3 as explained below. be pedestrians only 1 only 2 waste of money. 2 Can not be justified. 2 No Ans 1948 1 2 1 YO17 9 Important to have a weight restriction on St If no shared space parking restrictions 58 22232231111 1 Nicholas St also 20mph zone. 3 No Ans No Ans 1 pedestrian only 2 not a priority 1 not a priority 1 must be enforced ie. yellow lines 1948 2 2 2 YO17 9 59 2433423222 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1964 2 2 1 YO17 7 Please clean the streets. Autumn leaves 60 1 5 No AnsNo Ans 5 1 11 1 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 Brilliant option. Start it today. Marvellous Put all money into N1 2 Put all money into N1 2 Put all money into N1 2 No Ans 2 down York Rd are now TWO years old. No Ans 1 2 No Ans YO17 7 Brambling Fields interchange should have Smarted up areas in Market Place nice 61 2 2 No AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo Ans 2 2 2 No Ans 1 been done years ago. 4 footpaths. Resurfacing roads keep traffic No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans 1942 2 2 1 YO17 7 Don't agree with losing 1 lane of traffic from All the current proposals have potential grave I agree with the idea of some Castlegate to Butcher Corner. How will the problems with traffic particularly from pedestrianisation but the traffic still has 62 2 1 No AnsNo Ans 2 2 22223 2 HGV ban be policed - is every lorry to be 4 Yorkersgate. No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 to be able to flow. 1947 2 2 1 YO17 6 What about HGV's usage through Malton and N3 - different attiitude in UK from cyclists and Norton towards Helmsley? Not in drivers to continent. N1 and N2 and N3 why No reason for doing this. Waste Pelican crossing only otherwise 63 31334151223 1 consideration? Plans not going to remove 4 do we need pedestrianisation - leave as is. Blue badge car parking! 2 Blue badge car parking! 2 of money. 2 longest traffic. No Ans No Ans 1969 2 2 1 YO17 9 64 No AnsNo Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 12 2 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 4 No Ans Any loss of parking would not be good 2 No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans 1938 2 No Ans 1 YO18 No Ans Some ridiculous ideas. Coordination 65 5 3 No AnsNo Ans 5 3 31113 1 No Ans 4 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 with future plans for Market needed 1949 2 2 1 YO17 7 Proposals to reduce Castlegare to one lane is 66 2 3 No AnsNo Ans 2 3 32223 1 ridiculous and will cause more congestion and No Ans N1 but only if Newgate is retained as 2 way. No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1942 1 2 1 YO17 7 67 1 1 No AnsNo Ans 3 2 12223 1 No Ans 2 Possibly keep market street one way to the No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1941 2 2 1 YO17 7 re Item B: The plan on page 4 of the consultation document wrongly labels Castlegate at the end of Church Street 68 11121111112 1 (Norton). The recent reconstruction of 4 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1961 1 2 1 YO17 9 Two lanes in Castlegate should be retained on the approach to the traffic lights. Reduction in N2 preferred but only if Newgate remains 2 A pedestrian crossing is needed in 69 No AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo Ans 3 3 32223 1 traffic levels will improve air quality. The No Ans way No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 Yorkersgate 1922 1 1 1 YO32 No Ans This project while solving some of the Not ideal but better than the others. If the problems will not make any difference to Saturday market was transferred to this area. 70 2 2 2 No Ans 4 4 21212 2 traffic going to Beverley. The quickest route is 1 Cover would be an advantage to both shops No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1942 1 2 1 YO17 7 I cannot understand how making Norton Rd In these difficult times I cannot believe one way to cars will improve traffic through that we are even considering changing a 71 24555114445 5 Malton. This is a ridiculous idea. Remaing one 4 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 system which is basically OK. 1966 2 2 1 YO17 8 72 11332111113 4 No Ans 4 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1935 1 2 No Ans YO17 9 73 2 1 1 No Ans 3 1 12423 1 No Ans 1 P -Yorkersgate - Yes please! No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1953 2 1 1 YO11 9 74 22322222223 2 No Ans 3 No Ans No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1954 2 2 1 YO17 7 It works now - leave it along. All options could Dangerous to blind and disabled users Too dangerous to many 24545332223 5 Implications not fully considered 4 be detrimental to businesses & children 2 pedestrians 2 Not wider paths 2 Not raised footways across roads 2 No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans I support the Brambling Fields interchange but It feels essential that traffic should be able to not the Norton Rd changes. Commercial St is move freely round the market place, 2 4 No AnsNo Ans 2 2 21223 4 already 20mph. The signs are difficult to see 4 especially all emergency vehicles and refuse No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1935 2 2 1 YO17 7 We certainly need to ban HGV's except for access but to reduce the traffic lanes at I feel strongly that there is a safety I feel strongly that there is a 42422222223 2 Castlegate would only increase the length of 4 No Ans issue 2 safety issue 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1930 2 2 1 YO17 7 Generally support but abosolutely oppose any proposal to increase or speed up traffic on Bazleys Lane which is a rat run. To speed up traffic would increase risk of accidents and 3 2 No AnsNo Ans 2 2 52222 4 encourage HGV vehicles to use it. We need a 1 No Ans No Ans 1 No Ans No Ans Keep parking as it is at present 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1933 1 2 1 YO17 9 No Ans Maintenance is long overdue on footway 3 2 No Ans 1 No AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo Ans 1 1 improvements - they are a disgrace! No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans 1948 2 2 1 YO17 8 Numerically, alas, fewer people will make the footway improvements L a priority because it’s a rural location as opposed to Malton. That said, ladies pushing prams to school, oldies 3 2 No Ans 2 No AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo Ans 1 No Anson walks, have to face speeding trucks on the No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans 1948 1 2 1 YO17 8 32312222221 2 No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans 1949 2 2 1 YO17 8 No AnsNo AnsNo Ans 1 No AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo Ans 1 1 No Ans 4 No Ans No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1950 1 2 1 YO17 8 No No AnsNo AnsNo Ans 1 No AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo AnsNo Ans 1 No AnsNo Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No 2 No Ans 312 3 32221 No AnsNo Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans The idea of an interchange is good 'but' this scheme can be made much less expensive if only I roundabout is built - also saving more No point in huge expense unless Fritzwilliam farming land from cumpolsary purchase. Estate drop their rents so that shops remain Placed at the eastern end of the interchange it open/come back. If they do that then option Too dangerous to many 22554332222 5 would have the added benefit of slowing the 4 N1 is best. Too dangerous 2 pedestrians 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans 75 44444422244 2 No Ans 4 No Ans No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans No Ans No Ans 2 1 YO17 6 F: Where will HGV's park after reconstruction None. Two way traffic in front of Hoppers of path? They hinder exits to sites making it would be a nightmare. Leave it one way. It's 76 22335332223 1 difficult for other road users but where will you 4 difficult enough now trying to drive one-way No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 1947 2 1 1 YO17 7 I cannot see how this will Access to the A64 from York Road Retain the Castlegate traffic lane through for improve Butchers Corner and Although if the pedestrian Industrial Estate needs to be improved right turning traffic if signal phasing is not Especially if the livestock auction site is to be in the 'austere' times that the crossing is controlled by lights it so lorries and other vehicles head to 77 4 5 No AnsNo Ans 2 5 11112 2 changed. 4 developed as proposed. No Ans 2 No Ans 2 cost is justified. 2 may cause extra congestion. 1 Scarborough/Old Malton and 1966 1 2 1 YO17 9 K: Saville Street - the west pavement should I am very concerned that any change might Widen west footpath so road has same Pedestrian crossing is unhelpful 78 2 5 No AnsNo Ans 1 4 522 15 No Ansbe widened to make it a one carriage way - no 4 make the only exit from a lot of the market width all the length as at Yorkersgate 2 But pedestrianise St Nicholas St. 2 it works as it is. 2 also get rid of inappropriate road 1 No Ans No Ans 1 2 1 YO17 9 79 2 4 No AnsNo Ans 4 3 22243 1 No Ans 1 No Ans No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 2 No Ans 2 No Ans 1948 1 2 1 YO17 9 80 23122221113 1 No Ans 3 No Ans No Ans 1 No Ans 1 No Ans 1 Nothing wrong with it. 2 No Ans 1944 1 1 1 YO62 6 I consider that exiting from Spital St is more Pedestrianisation will kill the shopping trade in Yes to pedestrian crossing but no difficult than from Frinkle St especially the Market Place. Fewer parkign places mean The way pedestrians use this road it is Leave things as they are but to raised footpath. I can only see 81 5 3 No AnsNo Ans 3 5 32243 1 because of the cross roads. When used 4 fewer shoppers. People will not walk from already shared space! 1 No Ans 1 offset the traffic lights. 2 them complicating life. No Ans No Ans 1939 2 No Ans 1 YO17 6 82 24332222333 3 No Ans 4 No Ans Too risky for the young/impaired. 2 too risky for the young/impaired. 2 No Ans 1 No Ans 2 No Ans 1923 1 2 1 YO17 7 83 33322322331 3 No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans 1946 2 2 1 YO17 8 84 23323332321 3 No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans 1946 2 2 1 YO17 8 85 23322332221 No AnsNo Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans No Ans 1945 1 1 1 YO17 8