DOCSLIB.ORG

Load Master Certification Working Group Recommendation Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Load Master Certification Working Group Recommendation Report Loadmaster Certification Working Group Recommendation Report REVISION REVISION DATE Final May 17, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .........................................................................................................................v 1. Background ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 The Task .......................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Working Group Activity .................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Participants in the Working Group ................................................................................... 4 2. Working Group Activities .......................................................................................................... 5 2.1. Review the Assigned Tasks and Any Other Related Materials or Documents .............. 5 2.2. Draft and Submit a Work Plan for Completion of the Task, Including the Rationale Supporting Such a Plan, for Consideration by the ARAC .............................. 5 2.3. Provide a Status Report at Each ARAC Meeting ............................................................ 5 2.4. Draft and Submit the Recommendation Report Based on the Review and Analysis of the Assigned Tasks ....................................................................................... 6 2.4.1. Risk Mitigation Activities Implemented Since the Accident ................................. 6 2.4.2. Rationale for Limiting Scope of the Recommendation to 14 CFR Part 121 Operations ............................................................................................. 7 2.4.3. Definition of Special Cargo .................................................................................. 8 2.4.4. Consideration of Fatigue and Creation of Duty-Hour Limitations ....................... 8 2.5. Task Elements ................................................................................................................. 8 2.5.1. Additional Considerations/Assumptions .............................................................. 9 2.6. Determine Which Persons or Positions Should be Considered ................................... 10 2.6.1. Consensus Position ........................................................................................... 11 2.6.2. Dissenting Position ............................................................................................ 11 2.7. Present the Recommendation Report at the ARAC Meeting ....................................... 11 2.8. Summary of Working Group Activities........................................................................... 11 3. Safety Enhancement Options Considered ............................................................................. 12 3.1. Options Evaluated ......................................................................................................... 12 3.1.1. FAA-Approved Special Cargo Program ............................................................ 14 3.1.2. Repairman Subpart E ........................................................................................ 16 3.1.3. Repairman Subpart G ........................................................................................ 16 3.1.4. Flight Attendant .................................................................................................. 17 3.1.5. Airframe and Powerplant Mechanic .................................................................. 18 3.1.6. Hybrid (FAA-Approved Special Cargo Program and Repairman Subpart G) ....................................................................................................................... 19 3.1.7. Designated FAA Representative ....................................................................... 20 3.1.8. Airmen Other than Flightcrew Members............................................................ 21 3.2. Evaluation Aspects ........................................................................................................ 21 3.2.1. Likert Scale ........................................................................................................ 22 3.2.2. Further Evaluation of Options with Best Scores................................................ 22 4. Working Group Recommendation .......................................................................................... 25 4.1. Dissenting Position for Recommendation ..................................................................... 25 4.2. General Consensus Recommendation ......................................................................... 25 May 17, 2018 Recommendation Report ii 4.3. Additional Considerations .............................................................................................. 27 4.3.1. Economic Impact ............................................................................................... 27 4.3.2. Rule—Performance-Based ................................................................................ 27 4.3.3. Oversight ............................................................................................................ 28 5. Glossary .................................................................................................................................. 29 6. References .............................................................................................................................. 34 Appendix A. Dissenting Position from Professional Loadmaster Association and Consensus Response ........................................................................................................... A–1 Appendix B. Loadmaster Certification Working Group Work Plan ............................................ B–1 Appendix C. Benefits and Cost Impacts ..................................................................................... C–1 I. Overview .......................................................................................................................... C–2 II. Benefits for the FAA-Approved Special Cargo Program and the Repairman Subpart G models ........................................................................................................ C–2 A. Type of Accident ..............................................................................................C–2 B. Benefit Model ...................................................................................................C–2 C. Assumptions.....................................................................................................C–3 D. Total Accident Costs ........................................................................................C–3 E. Effectiveness Methodology ..............................................................................C–5 F. Benefits of the FAA-Approved Special Cargo Program and the Repairman Subpart G ......................................................................................C–8 III. Cost Impacts for the FAA-Approved Special Cargo Program and the Repairman Subpart G ..................................................................................................................... C–8 Appendix D. Examples of Special Cargo ................................................................................... D–1 May 17, 2018 Recommendation Report iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. By definition, this is considered special cargo because it requires special handling and restraining procedures. ................................................................. D–1 Figure 2. By definition, this is considered special cargo because it requires special handling and restraining procedures. ................................................................. D–2 Figure 3. By definition, this is considered special cargo because it requires special handling and restraining procedures. ................................................................. D–3 Figure 4. By definition, this is considered special cargo because it requires special handling and restraining procedures. ................................................................. D–4 Figure 5. By definition, this is considered special cargo because it requires special handling and restraining procedures (for cargo not contained within the net). ............................................................................................................... D–5 Figure 6. By definition, this is considered special cargo because it requires special handling and restraining procedures. ................................................................. D–6 Figure 7. Items classified as company materials (COMAT) may still be considered special cargo because they require special handling and restraining procedures. ....................................................................................... D–7 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Total Accident Costs .................................................................................................... C–4 Table 2. FAA-Approved Special Cargo Program Effectiveness Scoring .................................. C–6 Table 3. Repairman Subpart G Effectiveness Scoring ............................................................. C–6 Table 4. Benefits of the FAA-Approved Special Cargo Program and the Repairman Subpart G Models ..............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DAO Level 4 Certificate in Applied Aviation Studies (Fixed Wing Aircraft Loadmaster)
    Qualification Handbook DAO Level 4 Certificate in Applied Aviation Studies (Fixed Wing Aircraft Loadmaster) QN: 603/0925/8 The Qualification Overall Objective for the Qualifications This handbook relates to the following qualification: DAO Level 4 Certificate Applied Aviation Studies (Fixed Wing Aircraft Loadmaster) This Level 4 Certificate provides the standards that must be achieved by individuals that are working within the Armed Forces. Pre-entry Requirements Entry requirements are detailed in the Course prospectus. Learners who are taking this qualification should be employed in the WSOp trade Unit Content and Rules of Combination This qualification is made up of a total of 16 mandatory units and no Optional units. To be awarded this qualification the candidate must achieve a total of 35 credits as shown in the table below. URN Unit of assessment Level TQT GLH Credit Value D/615/4342 Duties of the WSOp CMN Fixed Wing and associated aircraft 3 7 7 1 K/615/4344 WSOp Regulations 3 16 10 2 T/615/4346 Weight and balance in fixed wing aircraft 4 46 40 5 A/615/4347 Loading and Restraint of Aircraft Cargo 4 42 42 5 F/615/4348 Cargo and Mail in Fixed Wing Operations 4 38 36 4 J/615/4349 Dangerous Goods (DG) on AT & ARR aircraft 4 45 45 5 A/615/4350 Passengers in the AT & ARR aircraft 3 6 6 1 J/615/4352 In–flight catering for WSOp 2 9 9 1 K/615/4361 Regulations of AT & ARR operations 3 25 25 3 M/615/4362 Pre Flying Exercise checks 4 14 14 2 T/615/4363 Radio operation (Crewman) 4 6 6 1 A/615/4364 WSOp (CMN) during aircraft operations (Simulator) 4 6 6 1 F/615/4365 WSOp Crewman procedures 4 9 9 1 J/615/4366 Duties of the WSOp CMN Fixed Wing when away from home base 4 5 5 1 L/615/4367 Principles of aircraft servicing (WSOp) 4 8 8 1 R/615/4368 Agencies associated with WSOP (CMN) operations 3 7 7 1 Age Restriction This qualification is available to learners aged 18+.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Aviation Administration Administration
    Federal Aviation Federal Aviation Administration Administration Cargo Focus Team And Air Cargo Operations Presented to: EMI FSDO Operators By: AFS-330 Date: February 2016 Overview Background Cargo Focus Team . NTSB . Working with Stakeholders . Short and Long Term Goals . Accomplishments . AC 120-85A Highlights Cargo Operations Changes to the AFM/WBM Current Issues and Initiatives February 2016 Cargo Focus Team Federal Aviation 2 Administration Background Cargo Aircraft Accident likelihood 20 times more likely than a passenger aircraft (according to IATA data) FAA CAST team is currently showing 30 to 50 February 2016 Cargo Focus Team Federal Aviation 3 Administration Background Following the Air Cargo accident in Afghanistan, a team was assembled to determine whether or not systemic problems exist regarding special cargo loads Aircraft Certification (AIR) and Flight Standards (AFS) are working jointly to address Cargo Operation with a focus on “Special Cargo” February 2016 Cargo Focus Team Federal Aviation 4 Administration Cargo Focus Team The FAA, Cargo Focus Team (CFT) exists as a permanent technical resource for cargo operations For cargo operations questions or suggestions contact CFT @ [email protected] February 2016 Cargo Focus Team Federal Aviation 5 Administration Cargo Focus Team Team Structure Interdependency Multi Discipline . Transport Airplane Directorate (ANM-100) . Air Transport Operations (AFS-200) . Aircraft Maintenance Division (AFS-300) . National Field Office (AFS-900) . Field Inspector (CMO- Detailees) February 2016 Cargo Focus Team Federal Aviation 6 Administration Cargo Focus Team The CFT Vision is to enhance the safety of air cargo operations. The CFT Mission is to directly support FAA field personnel, act as a focal point for the integrity of air cargo operations while serving as the FAA’s technical matter expert in air cargo operations February 2016 Cargo Focus Team Federal Aviation 7 Administration NTSB NTSB final report on from B-747 accident published July 29, 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Operations Group Chairman's Factual Report
    NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Office of Aviation Safety Washington, D.C. 20594 October 30, 2014 Group Chairman’s Factual Report OPERATIONAL FACTORS DCA13MA081 1 OPS FACTUAL REPORT DCA13MA081 Table Of Contents A. ACCIDENT ............................................................................................................................ 4 B. OPERATIONAL FACTORS GROUP ................................................................................... 4 C. SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ 5 D. DETAILS OF THE INVESTIGATION ................................................................................. 5 E. FACTUAL INFORMATION ................................................................................................. 6 1.0 History of Flight .............................................................................................................. 6 2.0 Flight Crew Information ................................................................................................. 9 2.1 The Captain ............................................................................................................... 10 2.1.1 The Captain’s Pilot Certification Record ............................................................ 11 2.1.2 The Captain’s Certificates and Ratings Held at Time of the Accident ............... 11 2.1.3 The Captain’s Training and Proficiency Checks Completed .............................. 11 2.1.4 The Captain’s
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Aviation Safety Team WHITE HOUSE COMMISSION on AVIATION SAFETY and the NATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION REVIEW COMMISSION (NCARC)
    Commercial Aviation Safety Team WHITE HOUSE COMMISSION ON AVIATION SAFETY AND THE NATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION REVIEW COMMISSION (NCARC) 1.1 . Reduce Fatal Accident Rate . •. Strategic Plan to Improve Safety . •. Improve Safety Worldwide . CAST BRINGS TOGETHER KEY STAKEHOLDERS TO COOPERATIVELY DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT A PRIORITIZED SAFETY AGENDA. Industry Government A4A DOD AIA FAA Airbus NASA ALPA ICAO** ACI–NA Commercial Aviation CAPA TCCA IATA** Safety Team NATCA NACA NTSB** Boeing EASA** GE* RAA FSF * Representing P&W and RR ** Observer CAST GOAL CAST came together in 1997 to form an unprecedented industry-Government partnership. Voluntary commitments, data-driven risk management, implementation-focused. Goal: Original Reduce the US commercial aviation fatal accident rate 80% by 2007. New Reduce the U.S. commercial aviation fatality risk by at least 50% from 2010 to 2025. CAST SAFETY STRATEGY Data Implement Safety Analysis Enhancements (SE) – United States Set Safety Priorities Agree on problems and interventions Influence SEs – Achieve consensus on Worldwide priorities Integrate into existing work and distribute RESOURCE COST VS. RISK REDUCTION 100% 10000 Risk Reduction APPROVED PLAN 9000 $ Total Cost in $ (Millions) 8000 75% 7000 6000 50% $ 5000 2007 2020 4000 3000 25% Resource Cost ($ Millions) Resource 2000 Risk Eliminated by Safety Enhancements 1000 $ $ $ 0% 0 COST SAVINGS Part 121 Aviation Industry Cost Due to Fatal/Hull Loss Accidents Historical cost of 100 accidents per flight cycle 80 Savings ~ $71/Flight Cycle 60 or ~ $852 Million
    [Show full text]
  • USFS MAFFS Operating Plan
    6 August 2019 Operations MAFFS OPERATING PLAN OPERATIO NS AUTHORITIES AND INSTRUMENTS .MODULAR AIRBORNE FIRE FIGHTING SYSTEM (MAFFS) DEPLOYMENT, OPERA TIO NS AND TRAINING Paul Linse Reviewed By: MAFFS Training Officer, Depl!-tY/4 ssistant Director, Operations - NIFC Kim Christensen .J><f - �- - b/: � _ '- .J CertifiedBy: Assistant Director,_ Aviation- W eadquarters t JeffPower / I . µ), // - ----------- -- Certified By: National MLO, Assistant Director forOperations - NIFC BethLund �� Supersedes 2016 MAFFS Operating Plan Distribution: USFS/F AM, BLM/A VN, NGB/A3, AFRC/ A3, AMC/ A3, AEG/CC, CAL FIRE 2 6 AUGUST 2019 ACCESSIBILITY: This publication is available digitally on the National Interagency Coordination Center web site https://www.nifc.gov/nicc/logistics/references/MAFFS_Operations_Plan .pdf. RELEASABILITY: Attachment 4 contains PII, shall not be released to the general public, and shall only be made available to authorized personnel. This instruction implements Forest Service Operations Guidelines for the Modular Airborne Fire Fighting Systems (MAFFS) training and operations program. It provides guidance regarding the activation, operation, and training; and outlines actions associated with MAFFS operations. This publication applies to Air National Guard (ANG) Wings and Air Force Reserve (AFRC) Wings authorized for MAFFS deployment and agency employees holding the appropriate wildland firefighting certifications for MAFFS operations. Restrictions in this document may only be waived by the NMLO or Deputy NMLO unless otherwise specified. The attachments in this publication may be updated individually without the update of the whole instruction and will be dated accordingly to ensure that the most current copy of the attachment is referenced for operational purposes. A supplement to this instruction may be issued with each update.
    [Show full text]
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • Airline Business & Law: Aircraft Acquisition, Finance & Leasing
    Airline Business & Law: Aircraft Acquisition, Finance & Leasing Airline Business & Law (ASPL 614) McGill Institute of Air & Space Law Mark Lessard Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP Table of Contents 1. Introduction: Aircraft as Investments 2. The Principal Players a. Aircraft Operators b. The Metal-Heads c. Sources of Finance 3. Aircraft Acquisition Process a. Selecting Equipment b. OEM Aircraft Purchase Agreements c. Pre-Delivery Payments and Financing d. Secondary Market 4. The Aircraft Leasing Industry a. Operating Leasing vs. Finance Leasing b. Asset Risk Arbitrage vs. Credit Arbitrage c. Depreciation Table of Contents 5. Aircraft Financing Methods a. Airline Credit vs. Asset Values b. Commercial Bank Lending c. Export Credit Agencies d. Capital Markets 6. Legal and Contractual Protections a. Perfecting Security in Aircraft b. Operation, Maintenance and Return Conditions c. Insurance 7. Default and Remedies a. Lease and Loan Defaults b. Airline Bankruptcies c. Foreclosure and Repossession d. Transition and Deficiency 8. Conclusion: Risk and Reward Introduction: Aircraft as Investments Q: What is the surest way to become a millionaire? A: Become a billionaire and start an airline… - Richard Branson Introduction: 10 Reasons for Investor Caution 1. Danger and liability = highly regulated industry (SAFETY!) 2. Variable operating costs, mainly driven by fuel and personnel 3. Highly mobile, crossing national borders and subject to expropriation 4. Expensive to maintain even when not in use 5. Value dependent on maintenance status, variant, upgrades, engine type, operating conditions, line number etc… 6. Highl y cycli cal i nd ust ry (GDP growth necessary b u t not suffi c ien t) 7. Long-dated asset (30 + years) 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force Transitions to a Single Combat Uniform
    189th Airlift Wing WARRIOR Vol. 21 No. 46 June 2018 Arkansas Air National Guard Little Rock Air Force Base, Ark. ANG flight engineer student rocks the 154th TRS school house, pgs. 4-5 Commander’s Commentary, pg. 2//C-130H upgrades underway, pg. 3//154th TRS trains student loadmasters, pg. 6-7// Demon 51: 30 years later, pg. 8//Summer safety, pg. 9//Air Force transitions to single combat uniform, pg. 10-11// 2 Warrior, June 2018 Warrior, June 2018 3 www.facebook. Commander’s Commentary com/189AW C-130H upgrades underway By Col. Thomas D. Crimmins www.instagram. 189th Airlift Wing Commander com/189AW reetings Warriors! We have a very busy super UTA this month, followed Publication Staff Gby our Annual Training in Gulfport, MS. If you can’t tell already, the heat has arrived and summer is already here in Arkansas. With Memorial Day behind Col. Thomas D. Crimmins 189th Airlift Wing us, summer activities are now in full swing. Please remember to stay hydrated, Commander use appropriate personal protective equipment (including sunscreen), and obey all applicable laws and safety guidelines for your specific form of recreation. VACANT As you all know, the Chief of Staff of the Air Force and Director of the Air Public Affairs Officer National Guard have directed an Air Force-wide Safety Stand Down to pause and Tech Sgt. Jessica Condit reflect on our safety culture and practices in light of recent mishaps. We will take Public Affairs Superintendent the entire day Sunday to focus on safety in all areas -operational, personal and Senior Airman Kayla K.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Operations Officer & Loadmaster
    Ground Operations Officer & Loadmaster Location Description of the position LGG, Liege Airport (Belgium) The Ground Operations Officer & Loadmaster assists the Ground Operations Department in day-to-day operations and acts as company loadmaster. Corporate responsibilities: About Challenge Supervise all cargo handling operations at home base (LGG) and Airlines (BE) outstations; Challenge Airlines (BE) Supervise cargo build-up, loading and offloading of company aircraft; S.A. is a new airline Act as company loadmaster on B747-400BCF/ERF; Assist in day-to-day Ground Operations tasks; based in Liege Airport (LGG) with a Belgian Act as Challenge Airlines (BE) Ground Operations Representative on AOC. The airline operates charter flights when needed; daily scheduled cargo Ensure and monitor compliance with Ground Operations Procedures flights and charter considering safety, quality and On Time Performance; services carrying Assist in composing handling and airport cost quotations. nonstandard goods and general cargo internationally. Challenge . Technical responsibilities: Airlines (BE) is part of a Proper use of Aviation industry and Aviation terminology; Global airline group that Application of precise and correct weight and balance procedures; carries approximately Supervision and guidance towards proper use of the company Aircraft 200,000 tons of cargo Cargo Loading System; annually. The Group is in Oversight and ownership of the safe and careful use of company aircraft rapid growth and is during loading and unloading processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Occurrence Report Declared Emergency/Wheel Failure Advance Air Charters Mcdonnell Douglas Dc-8-62F C-Fhaa Calgary Inte
    AVIATION OCCURRENCE REPORT DECLARED EMERGENCY/WHEEL FAILURE ADVANCE AIR CHARTERS MCDONNELL DOUGLAS DC-8-62F C-FHAA CALGARY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, ALBERTA 08 MARCH 1994 REPORT NUMBER A94W0026 MANDATE OF THE TSB The Canadian Transportation Accident Investigation and Safety Board Act provides the legal framework governing the TSB's activities. Basically, the TSB has a mandate to advance safety in the marine, pipeline, rail, and aviation modes of transportation by: ! conducting independent investigations and, if necessary, public inquiries into transportation occurrences in order to make findings as to their causes and contributing factors; ! reporting publicly on its investigations and public inquiries and on the related findings; ! identifying safety deficiencies as evidenced by transportation occurrences; ! making recommendations designed to eliminate or reduce any such safety deficiencies; and ! conducting special studies and special investigations on transportation safety matters. It is not the function of the Board to assign fault or determine civil or criminal liability. However, the Board must not refrain from fully reporting on the causes and contributing factors merely because fault or liability might be inferred from the Board's findings. INDEPENDENCE To enable the public to have confidence in the transportation accident investigation process, it is essential that the investigating agency be, and be seen to be, independent and free from any conflicts of interest when it investigates accidents, identifies safety deficiencies, and makes safety recommendations. Independence is a key feature of the TSB. The Board reports to Parliament through the President of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada and is separate from other government agencies and departments. Its independence enables it to be fully objective in arriving at its conclusions and recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Loadmaster Certification Working Group (LMCWG) Aviation
    Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 92/Thursday, May 12, 2016/Notices 29609 Dated: April 18, 2016. By issuing this notice, the Board is Board decisions and notices are John F. Kerry, instituting an exemption proceeding available on our Web site al Secretary ofState. pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 10502(b). A final "WWW.STB.DOT.GOV." (FR Doc. 2016-11281 Filed 5-11-16; 8:45 am] decision will be issued by August 10, Decided: May 9, 2016. BILLING CODE 4711>-42-P 2016. By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell. Any OFA under 49 CFR 1152.27(b)(2) Director, Office of Proceedings. to subsidize continued rail service will Jeffrey Henig, SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD be due by August 19, 2016, or 10 days Clearance Clerk. after service of a decision granting the (FR Doc:. 2016-11189 Filed 5-11-16; 8:45 aml [Docket No. AB 290 (Sub-No. 381X)) petition for exemption, whichever BILLING CODE 491H1..P Norfolk Southern Railway Company­ occurs first. Each OFA must be Abandonment Exemption-In Hamilton accompanied by a $1,600 filing fee. See 49 CFR 1002.2(0(25). County, Ohio DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION All interested persons should be On April 22, 2016, Norfolk Southern aware that, following abandonment, the Federal Aviation Administration Railway Company (NSR) filed with the Line may be suitable for other public Surface Transportation Board (Board) a use, including interim trail use. Any Aviation Rulemaking Advisory petition under 49 U.S.C. 10502 for request for a public use condition under Committee-New Task exemption from the prior approval 49 CFR 1152.
    [Show full text]
  • National Aviation Safety Inspection Program Federal Aviation Administration
    Memorandum U.S. Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary of Transportation Office of Inspector General Subject: INFORMATION: Report on the National Date: April 30, 1999 Aviation Safety Inspection Program, Federal Aviation Administration, AV-1999-093 From: Lawrence H. Weintrob Reply to Attn. of: JA-1:x61992 Assistant Inspector General for Auditing To: Federal Aviation Administrator This report summarizes our review of the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) National Aviation Safety Inspection Program. We are providing this report for your information and use. Your April 30, 1999, comments to our April 9, 1999, draft report were considered in preparing this report. An executive summary of the report follows this memorandum. In your comments to the draft report, you concurred with all recommendations. We consider your actions taken and planned to be responsive to all recommendations. The recommendations are considered resolved subject to the followup provisions of Department of Transportation Order 8000.1C. We appreciate the cooperation and assistance provided by your staff during the review. If you have questions or need further information, please contact me at (202) 366-1992, or Alexis M. Stefani, Deputy Assistant Inspector General for Aviation, at (202) 366-0500. Attachment # Alongtin/Rkoch/Arobson/jea/4-29-99 V:\Airtran\A-report\Final1.doc A:\NASIPRPT2.doc EXECUTIVE SUMMARY National Aviation Safety Inspection Program Federal Aviation Administration AV-1999-093 April 30, 1999 Objectives and Scope Congressman Peter A. DeFazio requested the Office of Inspector General to review the National Aviation Safety Inspection Program (NASIP) final report on ValuJet Airlines, Inc. (ValuJet)1 issued in February 1998.
    [Show full text]