Scientific Report for 2009 ESI the Erwin Schrödinger International
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Automorphy Lifting Theorems Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5br5g0fq Author Kalyanswamy, Sudesh Publication Date 2017 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Automorphy Lifting Theorems A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Mathematics by Sudesh Kalyanswamy 2017 c Copyright by Sudesh Kalyanswamy 2017 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Automorphy Lifting Theorems by Sudesh Kalyanswamy Doctor of Philosophy in Mathematics University of California, Los Angeles, 2017 Professor Chandrashekhar Khare, Chair This dissertation focus on automorphy lifting theorems and related questions. There are two primary components. The first deals with residually dihedral Galois representations. Namely, fix an odd prime p, and consider a continuous geometric representation ρ : GF ! GLn(O), where F is either a totally real field if n = 2, or a CM field if n > 2, and O is the integer ring of a finite extension of Qp. The goal is to prove the automorphy of representations whose residual representation ρ¯ has the property that the restriction to GF (ζp) is reducible, where ζp denotes a primitive p- th root of unity. This means the classical Taylor-Wiles hypothesis fails and classical patching techniques do not suffice to prove the automorphy of ρ. Building off the work of Thorne, we prove an automorphy theorem in the n = 2 case and apply the result to elliptic curves. The case n > 2 is examined briefly as well. The second component deals with the generic unobstructedness of compatible systems of adjoint representations. -
A Conference in Honor of HARUZO HIDA on His 60Th Birthday P -Adic Modular Forms and Arithmetic
A Conference in Honor of HARUZO HIDA on His 60th Birthday p -adic Modular Forms and Arithmetic List of Registered Participants as of June 16th, 2012 Name E-Mail Affiliation Adebisi Agboola [email protected] UC Santa Barbara Patrick Allen [email protected] UCLA Daniel Barrera [email protected] Université Paris 7 Joel Bellaiche [email protected] Brandeis University John Bergdall [email protected] Brandeis University Manjul Bhargava [email protected] Princeton University Stephane Bijakowski [email protected] Université Paris 13 Saikat Biswas [email protected] Georgia Tech Don Blasius [email protected] UCLA George Boxer [email protected] Harvard University Miljan Brakocevic [email protected] McGill University Hunter Brooks [email protected] University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Ashay Burungale [email protected] UCLA Kevin Buzzard [email protected] Imperial College Rene Cabrera [email protected] UCLA Bryden Cais [email protected] University of Arizona Francesc Castella [email protected] McGill University Tommaso Centeleghe [email protected] Heidelberg University Ching-Li Chai [email protected] University of Pennsylvania Narasimha Kumar Cheraku [email protected] University of Heidelberg Liubomir Chiriac [email protected] Caltech Dohoon Choi [email protected] KAU John H. Coates [email protected] University of Cambridge Dan Collins [email protected] Princeton University Pierre Colmez [email protected] Institut -
Curtis Frank Review
Curtis Franks, The Autonomy of Mathematical Knowledge: Hilbert’s program revisited. Cambridge University Press, 2009 Reviewed by Solomon Feferman According to Curtis Franks’ preface, this book bundles his historical, philosophical and logical research to center around what he thinks are “the most important and most overlooked aspects of Hilbert’s program … a glaring oversight of one truly unique aspect of Hilbert’s thought,” namely that “questions about mathematics that arise in philosophical reflection⎯questions about how and why its methods work⎯might best be addressed mathematically… Hilbert’s program was primarily an effort to demonstrate that.” The standard “well-rehearsed” story for these oversights is said to be that Hilbert’s philosophical vision was dashed by Gödel’s incompleteness theorems. But Franks argues to the contrary that Gödel’s remarkable early contributions to metamathematics instead drew “significant attention to the then fledgling discipline,” a field that has since proved to be exceptionally productive scientifically (even through the work of such logicians as Tarski, who mocked Hilbert’s program). One may well ask how the author’s effort to put this positive face on the patent failure of Hilbert’s program can possibly succeed in showing that mathematical knowledge is autonomous, that mathematics has only to look to itself for its proper foundations. Let us see. The first two chapters of Franks’ elegantly written book (whose text, unfortunately, is marred by numerous typos) are devoted to the development of Hilbert’s “new science” within his overall conception of mathematics and his philosophical naturalism.1 In particular, much of Ch. 2 draws on the Hamburg lectures [Hilbert 1922] in which Hilbert threw down the gauntlet against his primary opponents, the foundationalist skeptics Kronecker, Brouwer and Weyl, and laid out the plans and means 1 Franks takes Hilbert’s famous 1899 work on the foundations of geometry as a point of departure. -
• Hermann Weyll, 1927. Comments on Hilbert's
Hermann Weyll, 1927. Comments on Hilbert's second lecture on the • foundations of mathematics. Response to Hilbert's 1927 lecture. Weyll defends Poincar´ewho had a problem (circularity in the justification) with the with the metamathematical use of mathematical induction. Most important point: in constructive mathematics, the rule of generalization and of induction blend. Paul Bernays, 1927. Appendix to Hilbert's lecture \The foundations • of mathematics". This paper by Bernays presents a proof of Ackermann (second version) of the consistency of a certain system. The proof idea comes from Hilbert but is here formally worked out in a more general setting. The setting is not so general that it comprises all of analysis. Luitzen Egbertus Jan Brouwer, 1927a. Intuitionistic reflections on • formalism. This text is the first paragraph of a longer paper by Brouwer. He comes back to an earlier statement of his that dialogue between logicism (?) and intuitionism is excluded. In this paper his list four point on which formalism and intuitionism could enter a dialogue. The relevant (subjective!) points concern the relation between finite metamathematics and some parts of intuitionism. Wilhelm Ackermann, 1928. On HIlbert's constructoin of the real num- • bers/ I cannot really match the title with the content of the introduction. Probably Hilbert uses primitive recursive functions in constructing his real numbers. Ackermann presents a study of a generalized version of the recursion schema by allowing functions of lower type to occur in the re- cursing definitions. A function is introduced which is shown to be larger than every primitive recursive function. This function can be represented by a type-1 recursion simultaious on two variables. -
PETER SCHOLZE to RECEIVE 2013 SASTRA RAMANUJAN PRIZE the 2013 SASTRA Ramanujan Prize Will Be Awarded to Professor Peter Scholze
PETER SCHOLZE TO RECEIVE 2013 SASTRA RAMANUJAN PRIZE The 2013 SASTRA Ramanujan Prize will be awarded to Professor Peter Scholze of the University of Bonn, Germany. The SASTRA Ramanujan Prize was established in 2005 and is awarded annually for outstanding contributions by young mathematicians to areas influenced by the genius Srinivasa Ramanujan. The age limit for the prize has been set at 32 because Ramanujan achieved so much in his brief life of 32 years. The prize will be awarded in late December at the International Conference on Number Theory and Galois Representations at SASTRA University in Kumbakonam (Ramanujan's hometown) where the prize has been given annually. Professor Scholze has made revolutionary contributions to several areas at the interface of arithmetic algebraic geometry and the theory of automorphic forms. Already in his master's thesis at the University of Bonn, Scholze gave a new proof of the Local Langlands Conjecture for general linear groups. There were two previous approaches to this problem, one by Langlands{Kottwitz, and another by Harris and Taylor. Scholze's new approach was striking for its efficiency and simplicity. Scholze's proof is based on a novel approach to calculate the zeta function of certain Shimura varieties. This work completed in 2010, appeared in two papers in Inventiones Mathematicae in 2013. Scholze has generalized his methods partly in collaboration with Sug Woo Shin to determine the `-adic Galois representations defined by a class of Shimura varieties. These results are contained in two papers published in 2013 in the Journal of the American Mathematical Society. While this work for his master's was groundbreaking, his PhD thesis written under the direction of Professor Michael Rapoport at the University of Bonn was a more mar- velous breakthrough and a step up in terms of originality and insight. -
David Donoho COMMENTARY 52 Cliff Ord J
ISSN 0002-9920 (print) ISSN 1088-9477 (online) of the American Mathematical Society January 2018 Volume 65, Number 1 JMM 2018 Lecture Sampler page 6 Taking Mathematics to Heart y e n r a page 19 h C th T Ru a Columbus Meeting l i t h i page 90 a W il lia m s r e lk a W ca G Eri u n n a r C a rl ss on l l a d n a R na Da J i ll C . P ip her s e v e N ré F And e d e r i c o A rd ila s n e k c i M . E d al Ron Notices of the American Mathematical Society January 2018 FEATURED 6684 19 26 29 JMM 2018 Lecture Taking Mathematics to Graduate Student Section Sampler Heart Interview with Sharon Arroyo Conducted by Melinda Lanius Talithia Williams, Gunnar Carlsson, Alfi o Quarteroni Jill C. Pipher, Federico Ardila, Ruth WHAT IS...an Acylindrical Group Action? Charney, Erica Walker, Dana Randall, by omas Koberda André Neves, and Ronald E. Mickens AMS Graduate Student Blog All of us, wherever we are, can celebrate together here in this issue of Notices the San Diego Joint Mathematics Meetings. Our lecture sampler includes for the first time the AMS-MAA-SIAM Hrabowski-Gates-Tapia-McBay Lecture, this year by Talithia Williams on the new PBS series NOVA Wonders. After the sampler, other articles describe modeling the heart, Dürer's unfolding problem (which remains open), gerrymandering after the fall Supreme Court decision, a story for Congress about how geometry has advanced MRI, “My Father André Weil” (2018 is the 20th anniversary of his death), and a profile on Donald Knuth and native script by former Notices Senior Writer and Deputy Editor Allyn Jackson. -
An Interview with Martin Davis
Notices of the American Mathematical Society ISSN 0002-9920 ABCD springer.com New and Noteworthy from Springer Geometry Ramanujan‘s Lost Notebook An Introduction to Mathematical of the American Mathematical Society Selected Topics in Plane and Solid Part II Cryptography May 2008 Volume 55, Number 5 Geometry G. E. Andrews, Penn State University, University J. Hoffstein, J. Pipher, J. Silverman, Brown J. Aarts, Delft University of Technology, Park, PA, USA; B. C. Berndt, University of Illinois University, Providence, RI, USA Mediamatics, The Netherlands at Urbana, IL, USA This self-contained introduction to modern This is a book on Euclidean geometry that covers The “lost notebook” contains considerable cryptography emphasizes the mathematics the standard material in a completely new way, material on mock theta functions—undoubtedly behind the theory of public key cryptosystems while also introducing a number of new topics emanating from the last year of Ramanujan’s life. and digital signature schemes. The book focuses Interview with Martin Davis that would be suitable as a junior-senior level It should be emphasized that the material on on these key topics while developing the undergraduate textbook. The author does not mock theta functions is perhaps Ramanujan’s mathematical tools needed for the construction page 560 begin in the traditional manner with abstract deepest work more than half of the material in and security analysis of diverse cryptosystems. geometric axioms. Instead, he assumes the real the book is on q- series, including mock theta Only basic linear algebra is required of the numbers, and begins his treatment by functions; the remaining part deals with theta reader; techniques from algebra, number theory, introducing such modern concepts as a metric function identities, modular equations, and probability are introduced and developed as space, vector space notation, and groups, and incomplete elliptic integrals of the first kind and required. -
Curriculum Vita James W. Cogdell Address: Department Of
Curriculum Vita James W. Cogdell Address: Department of Mathematics Telephone: (614)-292-8678 The Ohio State University Fax: (614)-292-1479 231 W. 18th Avenue e-mail: [email protected] Columbus, OH 43210 Education: B.S.: Yale University, 1977. Ph.D.: Yale University, 1981. Positions: Rutgers University, 1982{1988, Assistant Professor. Oklahoma State University, 1987{1988, Assistant Professor. Oklahoma State University, 1988{1994, Associate Professor. Oklahoma State University, 1994{2004, Professor. Oklahoma State University, 1999{2001, Southwestern Bell Professor. Oklahoma State University, 2000{2004, Regents Professor. Oklahoma State University, 2003{2004, Vaughn Foundation Professor. The Ohio State University, 2004{present, Professor. Visiting Positions: University of Maryland, 1981{1982, Visiting Instructor. UCLA, Fall 1982, NSF Postdoctoral Fellow. Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, Fall 1983, NSF Postdoctoral Fellow. Institute for Advanced Studies, Hebrew University, Spring 1988, Member. Yale University, 1991{1992, Visiting Associate Professor. Yale University, Spring 1995, Visiting Fellow. Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, 1999{2000, CMI Scholar. Yale University, Fall 2002, Visiting Fellow / CMI Scholar. Fields Institute, Spring 2003, Senior Researcher. Erwin Schr¨odingerInstitute, Vienna, Autumn 2011 & Winter 2012, Senior Research Fellow. Editorial Boards: 1. GAFA (Geometric and Functional Analysis), 2001 - present. 2. IMRN (International Mathematics Research Notices), 2005 - present. 3. JNT (Journal of Number Theory), 2006 - 2012. Publications { Papers: 1. Fabrication of submicron Josephson microbridges using optical projection lithography and lift off tech- niques (with M.D. Feuer & D.E. Prober). A.I.P. Conference Proceedings 44 (1978), 317{321. 2. Congruence zeta functions for M2(Q) and their associated modular forms. Math. Annalen 266 (1983), 141{198. -
Institute for Pure and Applied Mathematics at the University of California Los Angeles
Institute for Pure and Applied Mathematics at the University of California Los Angeles Annual Progress Report NSF Award/Institution #0439872-013151000 Submitted November 30, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................2 A. PARTICIPANT LIST ...............................................................................4 B. FINANCIAL SUPPORT LIST....................................................................4 C. INCOME AND EXPENDITURE REPORT ....................................................4 D. POSTDOCTORAL PLACEMENT LIST ........................................................5 E. INSTITUTE DIRECTORS’ MEETING REPORT ...........................................5 F. PARTICIPANT SUMMARY.....................................................................10 G. POSTDOCTORAL PROGRAM SUMMARY ................................................11 H. GRADUATE STUDENT PROGRAM SUMMARY .........................................14 I. UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT PROGRAM SUMMARY ..............................20 K. PROGRAM CONSULTANT LIST .............................................................60 L. PUBLICATIONS LIST ...........................................................................72 M. INDUSTRIAL AND GOVERNMENTAL INVOLVEMENT .............................72 N. EXTERNAL SUPPORT ...........................................................................76 O. COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP ..................................................................77 P. CONTINUING IMPACT -
Of the American Mathematical Society June/July 2018 Volume 65, Number 6
ISSN 0002-9920 (print) ISSN 1088-9477 (online) of the American Mathematical Society June/July 2018 Volume 65, Number 6 James G. Arthur: 2017 AMS Steele Prize for Lifetime Achievement page 637 The Classification of Finite Simple Groups: A Progress Report page 646 Governance of the AMS page 668 Newark Meeting page 737 698 F 659 E 587 D 523 C 494 B 440 A 392 G 349 F 330 E 294 D 262 C 247 B 220 A 196 G 145 F 165 E 147 D 131 C 123 B 110 A 98 G About the Cover, page 635. 2020 Mathematics Research Communities Opportunity for Researchers in All Areas of Mathematics How would you like to organize a weeklong summer conference and … • Spend it on your own current research with motivated, able, early-career mathematicians; • Work with, and mentor, these early-career participants in a relaxed and informal setting; • Have all logistics handled; • Contribute widely to excellence and professionalism in the mathematical realm? These opportunities can be realized by organizer teams for the American Mathematical Society’s Mathematics Research Communities (MRC). Through the MRC program, participants form self-sustaining cohorts centered on mathematical research areas of common interest by: • Attending one-week topical conferences in the summer of 2020; • Participating in follow-up activities in the following year and beyond. Details about the MRC program and guidelines for organizer proposal preparation can be found at www.ams.org/programs/research-communities /mrc-proposals-20. The 2020 MRC program is contingent on renewed funding from the National Science Foundation. SEND PROPOSALS FOR 2020 AND INQUIRIES FOR FUTURE YEARS TO: Mathematics Research Communities American Mathematical Society Email: [email protected] Mail: 201 Charles Street, Providence, RI 02904 Fax: 401-455-4004 The target date for pre-proposals and proposals is August 31, 2018. -
2014 Annual Report
CLAY MATHEMATICS INSTITUTE www.claymath.org ANNUAL REPORT 2014 1 2 CMI ANNUAL REPORT 2014 CLAY MATHEMATICS INSTITUTE LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT Nicholas Woodhouse, President 2 contents ANNUAL MEETING Clay Research Conference 3 The Schanuel Paradigm 3 Chinese Dragons and Mating Trees 4 Steenrod Squares and Symplectic Fixed Points 4 Higher Order Fourier Analysis and Applications 5 Clay Research Conference Workshops 6 Advances in Probability: Integrability, Universality and Beyond 6 Analytic Number Theory 7 Functional Transcendence around Ax–Schanuel 8 Symplectic Topology 9 RECOGNIZING ACHIEVEMENT Clay Research Award 10 Highlights of Peter Scholze’s contributions by Michael Rapoport 11 PROFILE Interview with Ivan Corwin, Clay Research Fellow 14 PROGRAM OVERVIEW Summary of 2014 Research Activities 16 Clay Research Fellows 17 CMI Workshops 18 Geometry and Fluids 18 Extremal and Probabilistic Combinatorics 19 CMI Summer School 20 Periods and Motives: Feynman Amplitudes in the 21st Century 20 LMS/CMI Research Schools 23 Automorphic Forms and Related Topics 23 An Invitation to Geometry and Topology via G2 24 Algebraic Lie Theory and Representation Theory 24 Bounded Gaps between Primes 25 Enhancement and Partnership 26 PUBLICATIONS Selected Articles by Research Fellows 29 Books 30 Digital Library 35 NOMINATIONS, PROPOSALS AND APPLICATIONS 36 ACTIVITIES 2015 Institute Calendar 38 1 ach year, the CMI appoints two or three Clay Research Fellows. All are recent PhDs, and Emost are selected as they complete their theses. Their fellowships provide a gener- ous stipend, research funds, and the freedom to carry on research for up to five years anywhere in the world and without the distraction of teaching and administrative duties. -
History of Valuation Theory Part I
History of Valuation Theory Part I Peter Roquette (Heidelberg)∗ 23.7.2003 Abstract The theory of valuations was started in 1912 by the Hungarian mathe- matician Josef K¨ursch´akwho formulated the valuation axioms as we are used today. The main motivation was to provide a solid foundation for the theory of p-adic fields as defined by Kurt Hensel. In the following decades we can observe a quick development of valuation theory, triggered mainly by the discovery that much of algebraic number theory could be better understood by using valuation theoretic notions and methods. An out- standing figure in this development was Helmut Hasse. Independent of the application to number theory, there were essential contributions to valuation theory given by Alexander Ostrowski, published 1934. About the same time Wolfgang Krull gave a more general, universal definition of valuation which turned out to be applicable also in many other mathe- matical disciplines such as algebraic geometry or functional analysis, thus opening a new era of valuation theory. In the present article which is planned as the first part of more to come, we report on the development of valuation theory until the ideas of Krull about general valuations of arbitrary rank took roots. That is, we cover the pre-Krull era. As our sources we use not only the published articles but also the information contained in letters and other material from that time, mostly but not exclusively from the legacy of Hasse at the University library at G¨ottingen. ∗This copy contains some minor corrections of the published version.