FORM I
FORM - I (I) Basic Information S. No Item Details 1 Name of the project/s Bulk LPG Storage & Bottling Facility 2 S.No. in the schedule 6(b) – Isolated storage & handling of hazardous chemicals. 3 Proposed capacity / area / length / Mounded bullets for LPG storage - 3 x 600MT tonnage to be handled / command area / LPG throughput – 1,20,000MTPA lease area / number of wells to be drilled 4 New/Expansion/Modernization New 5 Existing Capacity/ Area etc. LPG storage bullets - 3 x 600MT LPG bottling capacity (throughput) – 1,20,000MTPA Consent orders were issued by Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board under Water (P&CP) Act, 1974 & Air (P&CP) Act, 1981. q Category of Project i.e. ‘A’ or ‘B’ A 7 Does it attract the general condition? If Yes. Gangaikondan Spotted Deer Sanctuary is yes, please specify. located within 5 km radius of the Project Site. 8 Does it attract the specific condition? No. However, the Indane Bottling Plant is located If yes, please specify. within SIPCOT Industrial Growth Centre, Gangaikondan village, Tirunelveli taluk & district. 9 Location Plot / Survey / Khasra No. B37/pt to B43/pt, B50/pt, B51/pt, C30 to 41 etc. Village Gangaikondan village Tehsil Tirunelveli District Tirunelveli State Tamil Nadu 10 Nearest railway station/airport along Gangaikondan Railway Station – 4km (E) with distance in Km. Tuticorin Airport – 33.55km (SW) 11 Nearest town, city, district headquarters Tirunelveli city – 13km (SSW) along with distance in Km. 12 Village panchayats, Zilla parished, The Commissioner municipal corporation, local body Tirunelveli Municipal Corporation (complete postal address with telephone Tirunelveli - 627001 nos. to be given) 13 Name of the applicant Shri Sabyasachi Mukherjee, 14 Registered address M/s Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Indane Bottling Plant) S.F. B37/pt to B43/pt, B50/pt, B51/pt, C30 to 41 etc.
Page 1
FORM I
SIPCOT Industrial Growth Centre, Gangaikondan Village, Tirunelveli Taluk & District – 627352 15 Address for correspondence Name Shri Sabyasachi Mukherjee, Designation (Owner/Partner/CEO) Chief Manager (LPG-OPS), Address IndianOil Corporation Limited No.126, Uthamar Gandhi Rd, Nungambakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu Pin Code 600034 E-Mail [email protected] Telephone No +91 9444803907 Fax No -- 16 Details of Alternative Sites Examined, Nil if any, location of these sites should be shown on a topo sheet. 17 Interlinked Projects Nil 18 Whether separate application of Not applicable interlinked project has been submitted? 19 If yes, date of submission -- 20 If no, reason -- 21 Whether the proposal involves Yes. Gangaikondan Spotted Deer Sanctuary falls approval/Clearance under the following under 26-A (1) (b) of The Wildlife (Protection) acts: if yes, details of the same and their Act, 1972. status to be given. (a)The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980? (b)The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972? (c)The C.R.Z Notification, 1991? 22 Whether there is any government order/ Nil Police relevant/ relating to the site? 23 Forest land involved (hectares) Nil 24 Whether there is any litigation pending Nil against the project and / or land in which the project is proposed to be set up? (a) Name of the Court (b) Case No. (c) Order/ directions of the Court, if any And its relevance with the proposed project
Page 2
FORM I
(II) Activity 1. Construction, operation or decommiss*ioning of the Project involving actions, which will cause physical changes in the locality (topography, land use, changes in water bodies, etc.) Details thereof with approximate quantities / Yes / S. No. Information/Checklist confirmation rates, wherever possible) with source of No information data 1.1 Permanent or temporary change in No Indane Bottling Plant is located within land use, land cover or topography SIPCOT Industrial Growth Centre, including increase intensity of land use Gangaikondan village. Total site area is (with respect to local land use plan) approximately 42 acres. 1.2 Clearance of existing land, vegetation No Not required and Buildings?
1.3 Creation of new land uses? No Not applicable 1.4 Pre-construction investigations e.g. Yes Geotechnical investigation for the existing Bore Houses, Soil testing? plant is enclosed as Annexure 1. 1.5 Construction works? Yes The Indane Bottling Plant has been established within SIPCOT Industrial Growth Centre, Gangaikondan after obtaining consent orders from TNPCB. 1.6 Demolition works? No Not applicable 1.7 Temporary sites used for construction No Not applicable works or housing of construction workers? 1.8 Above ground buildings, structures or Yes The following facilities have been set up: earthworks including linear structures, 1. Mounded bullets 3 x 600MT (1800MT cut and fill or excavations. bulk LPG storage capacity) 2. Filling stations / Carousel (2 nos.) 3. Tank Lorry Decanting Bays (8 nos.) 1.9 Underground works mining or No Not applicable tunneling? 1.10 Reclamation works? No Not applicable 1.11 Dredging? No Not applicable 1.12 Off shore structures? No Not applicable 1.13 Production and manufacturing Yes Throughput of LPG bottling will be processes? 1,20,000MTPA 1.14 Facilities for storage of goods or Yes Mounded bullets for bulk LPG storage (3 x materials? 600MT) have been set up within the Plant. 1.15 Facilities for treatment or disposal of Yes Domestic sewage (2.5KLD) is disposed solid waste or liquid effluents? through septic tank followed by soak pits.
Page 3
FORM I
Wash water from cylinder washing (0.8KLD) will be diverted to sedimentation traps and reused. No trade effluent arises from this operation. Spent lube oil will be sold to TNPCB Authorized Recyclers. 1.16 Facilities for long term housing of No Not applicable operational workers? 1.17 New road, rail or sea traffic during No Not applicable Construction or operation? 1.18 New road, rail, air waterborne or other No Not applicable transport infrastructure including new or altered routes and stations, ports, airports etc? 1.19 Closure or diversion of existing No Not applicable transport routes or infrastructure leading to changes in Traffic movements? 1.20 New or diverted transmission lines or No Not applicable pipelines? 1.21 Impoundment, damming, culverting, No Not applicable realignment or other changes to the hydrology of watercourses or aquifers? 1.22 Stream crossings? No Not applicable 1.23 Abstraction or transfers of water form Yes Water will be supplied by SIPCOT ground or surface waters? Industrial Growth Centre, Gangaikondan. 1.24 Changes in water bodies or land No Not applicable surface affecting drainage or runoff? 1.25 Transport of personnel or materials for No Not applicable construction, operation or decommissioning? 1.26 Long term dismantling or No Not applicable decommissioning or restoration works? 1.27 Ongoing activity during No Not applicable decommissioning which could have an impact on the environment? 1.28 Influx of people to an area either No Not applicable temporarily or permanently? 1.29 Introduction of alien species? No Not applicable 1.30 Loss of native species or genetic No Not applicable diversity?
Page 4
FORM I
1.31 Any other actions? No Not applicable
2. Use of Natural resources for construction or operation of the Project (such as land, water, materials or energy, especially any resources which are non-renewable or in short supply) Details there of (with approximate Information / checklist Yes / S. No. quantities/rates, wherever possible) with confirmation No source of information data 2.1 Land especially undeveloped or No Plant is located within SIPCOT Industrial agricultural land (ha) Growth Centre, Gangaikondan village. 2.2 Water (expected source & competing Yes Water for domestic & industrial usage is users) Unit: KLD around 4KLD which will be supplied through SIPCOT Industrial Growth Centre, Gangaikondan. 2.3 Minerals (MT) No Not applicable 2.4 Construction material - stone, Yes Total quantity of sand used is approximately aggregates, and / soil (expected 16,500 cu.m. The dimensions of the mound source - MT) are 9.11m (H) & 50m (L) x 64m (B). 2.5 Forests and timber (Source - MT) No Not applicable 2.6 Energy including electricity and fuels Yes Power requirement is 450kVA supplied by (source, competing users) TANGEDCO. Unit: fuel (MT), Energy (MW) D.G set of capacity 750kVA &250kVA are installed as backup power supply. High speed diesel (HSD) will be used for operating D.G sets & Fire engines. HSD tank having 20KL capacity has been set up at the Plant. 2.7 Any other natural resources No Not applicable (use appropriate standard units)
Page 5
FORM I
3. Use, storage, transport, handling or production of substances or materials, which could be harmful to human health or the environment or raise concerns about actual or perceived risks to human health Details there of (with approximate Yes / S. No. Information/Checklist confirmation quantities/rates, wherever possible) with No source of information data 3.1 Use of substances or materials, which Yes Indane Bottling Plant receives LPG through are hazardous (as per MSIHC rules) bullet trucks from M/s Indian Oil Petronas to human health or the environment Pvt Ltd. (flora, fauna, and water supplies) The consented throughput of LPG is 1,20,000MTPA. HSD for operating D.G sets & Fire engines is stored within the premises (20KL tank). 3.2 Changes in occurrence of disease or No Not applicable affect disease vectors (e.g. insect or water borne diseases) 3.3 Affect the welfare of people e.g. by No Not applicable changing living conditions? 3.4 Vulnerable groups of people who No Not applicable could be affected by the project e.g. hospital patients, children, the elderly etc. 3.5 Any other causes No Not applicable
4. Production of solid wastes during construction or operation or decommissioning (MT/month) Details there of (with approximate Information / Checklist Yes / S. No. quantities/rates, wherever possible) with confirmation No source of information data 4.1 Spoil, overburden or mine wastes No Not applicable 4.2 Municipal waste (domestic and or Yes Municipal solid waste is disposed through commercial wastes) local body.
4.3 Hazardous wastes (as per Hazardous Yes Spent / used lube oil will be sold to TNPCB Waste Management Rules) Authorized Recyclers. 4.4 Other industrial process wastes No Not applicable 4.5 Surplus product No Not applicable 4.6 Sewage sludge or other sludge from No Not applicable effluent treatment 4.7 Construction or demolition wastes No Not applicable 4.8 Redundant machinery or equipment Yes Scrap metal / old cylinders will be sold to authorized scrap dealers.
Page 6
FORM I
4.9 Contaminated soils or other materials No Not applicable 4.10 Agricultural wastes No Not applicable 4.11 Other solid wastes No Not applicable
5. Release of pollutants or any hazardous, toxic or noxious substances to air (Kg/hr) Details there of (with approximate Information / Checklist Yes/ S. No. quantities/rates, wherever possible) with confirmation No source of information data 5.1 Emissions from combustion of fossil Yes a. Point sources: D.G set fuels from stationary or mobile 1. 750kVA – 13.5m sources 2. 250kVA – 13.5m 3. Fire engines (3 nos.) – 11m b. Vehicular emissions: Movement of trucks in & out of site (adequate greenbelt will be established) 5.2 Emissions from production processes No Will not arise 5.3 Emissions from materials handling Yes Fugitive VOC emissions from cylinder filling storage or transport & storage area will be drawn through Vapour Extraction Unit & diverted to Cold Flare stack to disperse VOCs. 5.4 Emissions from construction activities No Will not arise including plant and equipment 5.5 Dust or odours from handling of No Will not arise materials including construction materials, sewage and waste. 5.6 Emissions from incineration of waste No Will not be permitted. 5.7 Emissions from burning of waste in No Will not be permitted. open air e.g. slash materials, construction debris. 5.8 Emissions from any other sources No Will not arise 6. Generation of Noise and Vibration, and Emissions of Light and Heat Details there of (with approximate Information/Checklist Yes/ quantities/rates, wherever possible) with S. No. confirmation No source of information data with source of information data 6.1 From operation of equipment e.g., Yes Noise generated during operation of D.G sets. engines, ventilation plant, crushers Adequate measures will be taken to maintain noise levels within the norms prescribed by CPCB for Industrial Area. 6.2 From industrial or similar processes No Will not arise
Page 7
FORM I
6.3 From construction or demolition No Will not arise 6.4 From blasting or piling No Will not arise 6.5 From construction or operational No Will not arise traffic 6.6 From lighting or cooling systems No Will not arise 6.7 From any other sources No Will not arise
7. Risks of contamination of land or water from releases of pollutants into the ground or into sewers, surface waters, groundwater, coastal waters or the sea Details there of (with approximate quantities Information/Checklist Yes / S. No. / rates, wherever possible) with source of confirmation No information data 7.1 From handling, storage, use or No The bullets are protected by constructing spillage of hazardous materials mounds of dimension (50m x 64m x 9.11m) 7.2 From discharge of sewage or other No Sewage will be disposed to septic tank effluents to water or the land followed by soak pits. The bottling process (expected mode and place of will not generate any trade effluent. discharge) 7.3 By deposition of pollutants emitted No D.G sets are fitted with stacks of adequate to air into the land and into water height (13.5m) for dispersion of emissions. 7.4 From any other sources No Will not arise 7.5 Is there a risk of long term build up No Will not arise of pollutants in the environment from these sources?
8. Risk of accidents during construction or operation of the Project, which could affect human health or the environment Details there of (with approximate Information/Checklist Yes / S.No. quantities/rates, wherever possible) with confirmation No source of information data 8.1 From explosions, spillages, fires No Adequate safety measures including fire etc from storage, handling, use or hydrants, extinguishers etc, are installed at production of hazardous the Bottling Plant. Apart from this, Risk substances Assessment has been carried out for the facility and On-site & Off-site Disaster Management Plan will be implemented at the plant. These have been detailed in the Prefeasibility Report. 8.2 From any other causes No Will not arise
Page 8
FORM I
8.3 Could the project be affected by No The project site falls under Seismic Zone II natural disasters causing as per Indian Standard Seismic Zoning environmental damage (e.g. Map. floods, earthquakes, landslides, cloud burst etc)?
9. Factors which should be considered (such as consequential development) which could lead to environmental effects or the potential for cumulative impacts with other existing or planned activities in the locality S. Information/Checklist Yes / Details there of (with approximate No. confirmation No quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data 9.1 Lead to development of No --- supporting. Utilities, ancillary development or development stimulated by the project which
could have impact on the environment e.g. Supporting infrastructure (roads, power supply, waste or waste water treatment, etc.)
Housing development --- No Extractive industry No --- Supply industry No --- Other No --- 9.2 Lead to after-use of the site, which No --- could have an impact on the environment. 9.3 Set a precedent for later No --- developments 9.4 Have cumulative effects due to No --- proximity to other existing or planned projects with similar effects
Page 9
FORM I
(III) Environmental Sensitivity Aerial distance S. (within 15km.) Areas Name/ Identity No. Proposed project location boundary 1 Areas protected under international Gangaikondan Spotted 1.2 Km (E) conventions, national or local legislation Deer Sanctuary for their ecological, landscape, cultural or other related value. 2 Areas which are important or sensitive Tamirabaranai river 5.9km (SSE) for Ecological reasons - Wetlands, watercourses or other water bodies, coastal zone, biospheres, mountains, forests. 3 Area used by protected, important or 1. Gangaikondan 1. 1.2 km (E) sensitive species of flora or fauna for Spotted Deer breeding, nesting, foraging, resting, over Sanctuary wintering, migration 2. Talaiyuthu RF 2. 919m (W) 3. MelpattamRF 3. 6.6km (S)
4 Inland, coastal, marine or underground Gangaikondan kulam 3.8km (ENE) waters Tamirabaranai river 5.9km (SSE) Indira kulam 7km (NE)
5 State, National boundaries Nil --- 6 Routes or facilities used by the public for Nil --- access to recreation or other tourist, pilgrim areas 7 Defense installations Nil --- 8 Densely populated or built-up area Tirunelveli City 13km (SSW) 9 Area occupied by sensitive man-made 1. Lakshmi Hospital 10.75km (SSW) land uses (Hospitals, schools, places of 2. Galaxy Hospital 11.25km (S) worship, community facilities) 3. Cathedral Higher 12.20km (S) Secondary School 4. Tirunelveli 13km (S) Medical College 10 Areas containing important, high quality Nil --- or scarce resources (ground water resources, surface resources, forestry, agriculture, fisheries, tourism, minerals)
Page 10
FORM I
11 Areas already subjected to pollution Nil --- environmental damage. (those where existing legal environmental standards are exceeded) 12 Areas susceptible to natural hazard Project site falls under Seismic Zone II as per which could cause the project to present Indian Seismic Zoning Map. environmental problems (earthquakes, subsidence, landslides, flooding, erosion, or extreme or adverse climatic conditions)
Page 11
FORM I
(IV) Proposed Terms of reference for EIA studies ToR for EIA studies in respect of the isolated storages, which are involved in handling of hazardous chemicals may include, but not limited to the following 1. Executive summary of the project – giving a prima facie idea of the objectives of the proposal, use of resources, justification, etc. In addition, it should provide a compilation of EIA report including EMP and the post-project monitoring plan, in brief. Project description 2. Justification for selecting the proposed storage capacity. 3. Land requirement for the project including its break up for various purposes, and its availability and optimization. 4. Details of proposed location layout clearly demarcating various units within the plant. 5. Mode of receiving hazardous chemicals in isolated storages and mode of its distribution. 6. Details on design parameters of the storages, procedures, piping layout, monitoring equipments, emergency requirements, safety controls, relief systems, etc. 7. Details on list of hazardous chemicals to be stored at the facility – its category, physical & chemical properties, storage quantities, etc., and compatibility with the design parameters of the storages. 8. Details of domino effect of the storage tanks and respective preventive measures including distance between storage units in an isolated storage facility. 9. Details on storage tanks including capacity and storage distance. 10. Details on transfer and handling of hazardous chemicals – piping system, handling techniques, equipments used, standard operating procedures, etc. 11. Details on specific equipments, flanges, pumps, compressors proposed to control loss of chemicals. Designed VOC loss accounting. 12. Details of proposed source-specific pollution control schemes/equipments. 13. Details on requirement and availability of power and water with its source and authorization from the concerned department. 14. Management plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage, utilization and disposal. 15. Details regarding infrastructure facilities such as sanitation, fuel storage, restroom, etc. to the workers during construction and operation phase. 16. Details on safety management plan. 17. In case of expansion of existing storages, remediation measures adopted to restore the environmental quality if the groundwater, soil, crop, air, etc., are affected and a detailed compliance to the prior environmental clearance/consent conditions. 18. Any litigation pending against the project and /or any direction /order passed by any Court of Law related to the environmental pollution and impacts in the last two years, if so, details thereof. Description of the environment
Page 12
FORM I
19. The study area shall be up to a distance of 10 km from the boundary of the proposed storage facility. 20. Location of the storage facility, nearest habitats with distances from the facility to be demarcated on a toposheet (1: 50000 scale). 21. Land use based on satellite imagery including location specific sensitivities such as national parks / wildlife sanctuary, villages, industries, etc.. 22. Demography details of all the villages falling within the study area. 23. Topography details of the project area. 24. The baseline data to be collected from the study area w.r.t. different components of environment viz. air, noise, water, land, biology and socio-economic (please refer Section 4.4.2 for guidance for assessment of baseline components and identify attributes of concern). Actual monitoring of baseline environmental components shall be strictly in accordance to the parameters prescribed in the ToR after considering the proposed coverage of parameters by the proponent in draft ToR and shall commence after finalization of ToR by the Competent Authority. 25. Geological features and geo-hydrological status of the study area. 26. Details on surface water quality of nearby water sources and other surface drains. 27. Details on ground water quality. 28. Relevant ambient air quality parameters for monitoring including combustion emissions due to traffic, VOCs and stored chemicals, etc . 29. Existing ambient air quality, expected emissions such as combustion emissions* due to traffic, VOCs*, stored chemicals*, etc.) and evaluation of the adequacy of the proposed pollution control devices to meet standards for point sources and to meet AAQ standards. (* - as applicable) 30. The air quality contours may be plotted on a location map showing the location of storage facility, habitation nearby, sensitive receptors, if any and wind roses. 31. Details on noise levels at sensitive/commercial receptor. 32. Site-specific micro-meteorological data including mixing height. 33. One season site-specific data excluding monsoon season. 34. Proposed baseline monitoring network for the consideration and approval of the Competent Authority. 35. Ecological status (terrestrial and aquatic) of the study area such as habitat type and quality, species, diversity, rarity, fragmentation, ecological linkage, age, abundance, etc. 36. If any incompatible landuse attributes fall within the study area, proponent shall describe the sensitivity (distance, area and significance) and propose the additional points based on significance for review and acceptance by the EAC/SEAC. Incompatible land use attributes include: Public water supply areas from rivers/surface water bodies, from ground water Scenic areas/tourism areas/hill resorts Religious places, pilgrim centers that attract over 10 lakh pilgrims a year
Page 13
FORM I
Protected tribal settlements (notified tribal areas where industrial activity is not permitted) Monuments of national significance, World Heritage Sites Cyclone, Tsunami prone areas (based on last 25 years); Airport areas Any other feature as specified by the State or local government and other features as locally applicable, including prime agricultural lands, pastures, migratory corridors, etc. 37. If ecologically sensitive attributes fall within the study area, proponent shall describe the sensitivity (distance, area and significance) and propose the additional points based on significance for review and acceptance by the EAC/ SEAC. Ecological sensitive attributes include: • National parks • Wild life sanctuaries Game reserve • Tiger reserve/elephant reserve/turtle nesting ground • Mangrove area • Wetlands • Reserved forests and protected forests • Any other closed/protected area under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. • Any other eco-sensitive areas, etc. 38. If the location falls in Valley, specific issues connected to the natural resources management shall be studied and presented. 39. If the location falls in CRZ area: A CRZ map duly authenticated by one of the authorized agencies demarcating LTL, HTL, CRZ area, location of the project and associate facilities w.r.t. CRZ, coastal features such as mangroves, if any. • Provide the CRZ map in 1:10000 scale in general cases and in 1:5000 scale for specific observations. • Proposed site for disposal of dredged material and environmental quality at the point of disposal/impact areas. • Fisheries study should be done w.r.t. Benthos and Marine organic material and coastal fisheries.
Anticipated environmental impacts and mitigation measures 40. Anticipated generic environmental impacts due to this project are indicated in Table 4-2, which may be evaluated for significance and based on corresponding likely impacts, VECs may be identified. Baseline studies may be conducted for all the concerned VECs and likely impacts will have to be assessed for their magnitude in order to identify mitigation measures (please refer Chapter 4 of the Manual for guidance).
Page 14
FORM I
41. Tools as given in Section 4.4.3 may be referred by the proponent for the appropriate assessment of environmental impacts and same may be submitted in draft ToR for consideration and approval by EAC/SEAC. 42. While identifying the likely impacts, also include the following for analysis of significance and required mitigation measures: • impacts due to emissions from entry and evacuation of chemicals at storage points • impacts due to temperature variations in the tanks • impacts due to emissions from handling of chemicals • impacts due to emissions from cleaning operations • impacts due to odour pollution • impacts due to generation of wastewater from drainage facilities, cleaning, tanks, seepage, etc. • impacts due to noise from tank installations, conveyors, transportation of products, etc. • impacts due to fugitive emissions/VOCs • impacts due to catastrophic failures • impacts due to residues/tank bottom sludge, etc. • impacts due to fire/accidents • impact on health of workers due to proposed project activities 43. In case of likely impacts from the proposed storage facility on the surrounding reserve forests, Plan for the conservation of wild fauna in consultation with the State Forest Department. 44. Action plan for the greenbelt development – species, width of plantations, planning schedule, etc., in accordance to CPCB published guidelines. 45. In case of likely impact from the proposed project on the surrounding reserve forests, Plan for the conservation of wild fauna in consultation with the State Forest Department. 46. For identifying the mitigation measures, please refer Chapter III for source control and treatment. Besides typical mitigation measures which may also be considered are discussed in Table 4-5. Analysis of alternative resources and technologies 47. Comparison of alternate sites considered and the reasons for selecting the proposed site. Conformity of the site with the prescribed guidelines in terms of CRZ, river, highways, railways, etc. 48. Details on improved technologies for storing and handling of hazardous chemicals. Environmental monitoring program 49. Monitoring programme for source control. 50. Appropriate monitoring network has to be designed and proposed to assess the possible residual impacts on VECs.
Page 15
FORM I
51. Monitoring pollutants at receiving environment for the appropriate notified parameters – air quality, groundwater, surface water, soil, etc. during operational phase of the project. 52. Leak detection and repair programme. 53. Specific programme to monitor occupational, safety and health protection of workers. 54. Details of in-house monitoring capabilities and the recognized agencies if proposed for conducting monitoring. Additional studies 55. Details on risk assessment and damage control during different phases of the project and proposed safeguard measures. 56. Details on status of emergency preparedness – safety procedures, training, personal protective equipments, fire fighting devises, medical aids, safety control systems, management plans, etc. 57. Details on socio-economic development activities such as commercial property values, generation of jobs, education, social conflicts, cultural status, accidents, etc. 58. Proposed plan to handle the socio-economic influence on the local community. The plan should include quantitative dimension as far as possible. 59. Details on compensation package for the people affected by the project, considering the socio-economic status of the area, homestead oustees, land oustees, and landless labourers. 60. Points identified in the public hearing and commitment of the project proponent to the same. Detailed action plan addressing the issues raised, and the details of necessary allocation of funds. 61. Details on plan for corporate social responsibility including the villages, population spread, SC/ST/backward communities, upgradation of existing schools, establishing new schools with facilities (such as laboratories, toilets, etc.), link roads, community halls, primary health facilities, health camps, etc. Environmental management plan 62. Administrative and technical organizational structure to ensure proposed post-project monitoring programme for approved mitigation measures. 63. EMP devised to mitigate the adverse impacts of the storage facility should be provided along with item-wise cost of its implementation (Capital and recurring costs). 64. Allocation of resources and responsibilities for plan implementation. 65. Details of the emergency preparedness plan and on-site and off-site disaster management plan.
Page 16
PREFEASIBILITY REPORT
A. INTRODUCTION a. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
M/s IndianOil Corporation Ltdhas set up a LPG Bulk Storage & Bottling Facility (Indane Bottling Plant) at S.F nos. B37/pt to B43/pt, B50/pt, B51/pt, C30 to 41 etc.at SIPCOT Industrial Growth Centre, Gangaikondan village, Tirunelveli Taluk &District, Tamil Nadu. LPG from M/s Indian Oil Petronas Pvt Ltd (Athipattu, Chennai) will be received through bullet trucks& stored in mounded bullets of capacity 3 x 600MT (total 1800MT). LPG will be pumped from storage bullets to filling shed where cylinders will be filled prior to dispatch through road. The current proposal has been submitted to Ministry of Environment, Forests & Climate Change for issuance of Environmental Clearance for the Tirunelveli Indane BP of bulk LPG storage (1800MT) and the LPG throughput of 1,20,000MTPA through 2 LPG Filling Stations / Carousels each having 24 filling machines.
b. NATURE OF PROJECT
Indane Bottling Plant operates strictly as a storage & packing facility for LPG into 14.2kg, 19kg, 47.5kg & 85kg cylinders. No by-products / additional products are generated / manufactured during the operations. The project site falls within 5 km radius (aerial distance) of Gangaikondan Spotted Deer Sanctuary. Hence, the present proposal is classified under Schedule 6(b) & Category ‘A’ as per General Conditions listed in EIA Notification 2006 & subsequent amendments.
c. PROFILE OF PROJECT PROPONENT
Indian Oil Corporation Limited is an Indian state-owned oil and gas corporation with its headquarters in New Delhi, India. It is the world's 88th largest corporation, according to the Fortune Global 500 list, and the largest public corporation in India when ranked by revenue. IndianOil is the highest ranked Indian company in the latest Fortune ‘Global 500’ listings, ranked at the 96th position. The company is mainly controlled by Government of India which owns approximately 79% shares in the company. It is one of the seven Maharatna status companies of India, apart from Coal India Limited, NTPC Limited, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation, Steel Authority of India Limited, Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited and Gas Authority of India Limited.
Page 1
PREFEASIBILITY REPORT
IndianOil and its subsidiaries account for a 49% share in the petroleum products market, 31% share in refining capacity and 67% downstream sector pipelines capacity in India. The IndianOil Group of companies owns and operates 10 of India's 22 refineries with a combined refining capacity of 65.7 million metric tonnes per year. In FY 2012 IOCL sold 75.66 million tonnes of petroleum products and reported a PBT of Rs.37.54 billion, and the Government of India earned an excise duty of Rs.232.53 billion and tax of INR10.68 billion. d. NEED FOR THE PROJECT & ITS IMPORTANCE
The present demand for packed LPG in Tamil Nadu is 780TMT as against the rated bottling capacity of 682TMTPA as on 1st April 2011. MOP&NG has mandated coverage of 75% population with LPG connection by the year 2014-15 including LPG connection in rural markets under RGGLV Scheme. The packed LPG demand projections in the State of Tamil Nadu are estimated to be 1051 TMT by the year 2014-15. Even after exhausting the available possibilities of additional capacity generation of 300 TPTMA in the Tirunelveli LPG Bottling Plants in Tamil Nadu, the available LPG capacity would not be sufficient to meet the increased demand of 1051 TMT during the year 2014-15. Therefore there is a requirement of setting up a new LPG Bottling Plant in the state of Tamil Nadu. Presently, there are no IOCL bottling plants in down south of Madurai, i.e. in the districts of Tirunelveli, Tuticorin, Kanyakumari and Nagercoil. There is a backlog at times during monsoon season and festival seasons. In order to overcome this problem, a bottling plant is very much necessary to be established in Tirunelveli to cater to the customers in the above districts so that there would not be a shortfall in supplies and customers will not be affected on any account. e. DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT PROPOSAL
The present proposal has been submitted to MoEF-CC for obtaining EC for the Tirunelveli Indane BP of bulk LPG storage capacity of 1800MT to achieve the consented LPG bottling throughput of1,20,000MTPA.The throughput will be achieved by installing two LPG cylinder Filling Carousels each having 24 Filling Machines within the plant.
Page 2
PREFEASIBILITY REPORT
B. SITE ANALYSIS
M/s. IndianOil Corporation Ltd has set up the Indane Bottling Plant located at S.F nos. B37/pt to B43/pt, B50/pt, B51/pt, C30 to 41 etc. at SIPCOT Industrial Growth Centre, Gangaikondan village, Tirunelveli Taluk & District. The Google map showing the project site is given in Figure 2.1. The general location of the project area is shown in Figure 2.2.
FIGURE 2.1 GOOGLE IMAGE OF PROJECT SITE
Page 3
PREFEASIBILITY REPORT
FIGURE 2.2 LOCATION MAP OF PROJECT SITE
Page 4
PREFEASIBILITY REPORT
a. CONNECTIVITY
The project site is well connected by road and rail network. The project site is located adjacent to NH 7 which connects Varanasi & Kanyakumari. Gangaikondan Railway Station is located at the distance of 4km(E). Tuticorin Airport is located at the distance of 33.55km (SW). Map showing the road network around the site is given in Figure 2.3.
FIGURE 2.3 CONNECTIVITY MAP b. SITE CHARACTERISTICS
Table 2.1 Environmental Settings of the Project Site S. No. Particulars Details 1 Latitude 8°49'50.10"N 2 Longitude 77°44'41.27"E 3 Site Elevation above MSL 0 m 4 Topography Plain 5 Present land use at the site Industrial 6 Nearest highway National Highway 7 – 850m (SE) 7 Nearest railway station Gangaikondan Railway Station – 4km (E) 8 Nearest airport Tuticorin Airport – 33.55 km (SW) 9 Nearest town / city Tirunelveli city – 13km (S)
Page 5
PREFEASIBILITY REPORT
S. No. Particulars Details 10 Water body Tamirabarani river – 5.9km (SSE) Gangaikondan kulam – 3.8km (ENE) Indira kulam – 7km (NE) Mannur pond – 11.3km (W) Nainarkulam lake – 11.2km (SSW) 11 Nearest Port Tuticorin Port – 46km (ESE) 12 Hills / valleys Nil in 15km radius 13 Archaeologically important Nil in 15km radius places 14 National parks / Wildlife Gangaikondan Spotted Deer Sanctuary– 1.2 Sanctuaries/Eco sensitive zones km (E) as per Wild Life Protection Act, 1972 15 Reserved / Protected Forests Talaiyuthu RF – 919 m (W) Melpattam RF- 6.6 km (s) 16 Seismicity Zone II according to the Indian Standard Seismic Zoning Map 17 Defense Installations Nil in 15km radius c. CLIMATE
The district enjoys a tropical climate. The period from April to June is generally hot and dry. The weather is pleasant during the period from November to January. d. TEMPERATURE
The district enjoys a Sub tropical climate. The period from May to June is generallyhot and dry. The weather is pleasant during the period from December to January. The mean minimumtemperature is 22.9°C and mean maximum daily temperature is 33.5°C respectively. e. RAINFALL
The district receives the rain under the influence of both southwest and northeast monsoons. The northeast monsoon chiefly contributes to the rainfall in the district.Rainfall data from IMD stations over the period 1901-2000 were utilized and a perusal of the data shows that the normal annual rainfall over the district is 879 mm. Itis the maximum around Senkottai, Sankarankoil and all along the coast and it decreases towards inland. The areas around Ambasamudram, Tirunelveli and Kadayanallur receive minimum rainfall.
Page 6
PREFEASIBILITY REPORT
f. RELATIVE HUMIDITY
Therelative humidity is on an average between 79 and 84%.
g. GEOMORPHOLOGY
Tirunelveli district is bordered by Western Ghats (Ridge and valley complex) in the West. A major part of the district constitutes a plain terrain with a gentle slope towardEast and Southeast, except for the hilly terrain in the west The general elevation of the area varies from less than 10 to 1408 m amsl (Tulukkaparai hill range)The prominent geomorphic units identified in the district through interpretation of Satellite imagery are Structural Hill, Bazada Zone, Valley Fill, Flood Plain, Pediment,Shallow buried pediment, Deep buried pediment and Coastal Plain.
h. SOIL
Soils in the area have been classified into i ) Deep Red soil ii). Red Sandy Soil. iii) Block Cotton Soil. iv) Saline Coastal Alluvium, and v) River Alluvium. Major parts of the area are covered by Deep Red soil and are found in Sivakasi, Tenkasi, Senkottai and Sankarankoil blocks and it is suitable for cultivating coconut andpalmyrah trees. Red sandy soil also in reddish yellow in colour and are found in Nanguneri, Ambasamudram, and Radhapuram blocks and it is suitable for cultivatinggroundnut, millets and pulses etc., The Block Cotton Soil is found in Tirunelveli, Palayankottai and Sankarankoil blocks, and it is suitable for cultivating Paddy, Ragi,and Cholam etc., The Saline Coastal Alluvium are dark grey to deep brown in colour and spread over the Nanguneri and Radhapuram blocks. The River alluvial soils occuralong the river courses of Tamrabarani and Chittar river covering in the blocks Tirunelveli and Palayankottai and it is suitable for cultivating Groundnut, Chillies and Cumbu.
i. INFRASTRUCTURE
i. INDUSTRIES
1. SIPCOT INDUSTRIAL GROWTH CENTRE Industrial Growth Centre, Gangaikondan – SIPCOT (www.sipcot.com) is located at about 17 KMs from Tirunelveli in a village called Gangaikondan at an area of 2073.86 acres. As on January 2013 there are 13 units functioning at an area of 174.87 acres and 8 units are under construction at about 594.38 acres in Gangaikondan growth Centre.
Page 7
PREFEASIBILITY REPORT
2. SIDCO INDUSTRIAL ESTATES To cater to the needs of the entrepreneurs SIDCO has developed three Industrial Estates at Pettai (Tirunelveli), Kesavaneri (Vallioor), Mangalapuram, (Kadayanallur).
3. SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE Sipcot has promoted a multiproduct SEZ at Nangunari called AMRL High Tech City Ltd. Some industries located in the vicinity of IOCL are shown in the following table, Table 2.3 List of industries in vicinity of IOCL
1. Elcot IT Park 2. Alliance Tire Group 3. M/s.BOSCH Limited. 4. M/s.Ramco Industries Ltd. 5. M/s.South India Bottling Company Pvt Ltd.
Page 8
PREFEASIBILITY REPORT
C. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
M/s IndianOil Corporation Ltd has set up a LPG cylinder bottling plant i.e. Indane Bottling Plant (IBP) at SIPCOT, Gangaikondan village. Prior to commencing construction activities M/s IOCL have obtained Consent to Establish from Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board (TNPCB) vide Consent Order No. 6045/5985 dtd. 18.09.2012enclosed as Annexure 2. Subsequently they have obtained Consent to Operate from TNPCB vide Consent Order No. 23108/19145 dtd. 07.04.2015enclosed as Annexure 3. The current proposal has been submitted to MoEF-CC for issuance of Environmental Clearance for theTirunelveliIndane BP of bulk LPG storage (1800MT) and the LPG throughput of 1,20,000MTPA through 2 LPG Filling Stations / Carousels. a. LAYOUT OF PROJECT SITE
The total area occupied by Indane Bottling Plant is approximately 42 acres &has been leased to M/s IndianOil Corporation Ltd. Land vide documents enclosed as Annexure4. The layout of the plant is shown in Figure 3.1.
Page 9
PREFEASIBILITY REPORT
FIGURE 3.1 SITE LAYOUT
Page 10
PREFEASIBILITY REPORT
b. DETAILS OF ALTERNATE SITES CONSIDERED
The reasons favorable to setting up the Indane Bottling Plant at SIPCOT, Gangaikondan village are, 1. The Plant is located in the SIPCOT Industrial Growth Centre hence basic infrastructure of roads, power, water etc. is readily available. 2. There is an estimated saving of Rs. 14.48 Crores/annum towards logistic cost. 3. The site is located near high demand area. 4. There is no likelihood of any residential development in the vicinity of the Plant. 5. Possible mutual aid in emergency will be available in the Industrial Area. 6. There is potential for future growth in demand. 7. Adequate availability of land within the site for future expansion. c. SIZE & MAGNITUDE OF OPERATION
The Indane Bottling Planthas a consented LPG bottling throughput of 1,20,000MTPA and bulk storage capacity is 1800MT (3mounded bullets x 600MT capacity). Table 3.1 Details on current proposal
Bulk LPG storage facility LPG bottling throughput 3 x 600MT (mounded bullets) 1,20,000MTPA
M/s IOCL have obtained Petroleum & Explosives Safety Organization (PESO) License for the mentioned quantity of LPG storage (enclosed as Annexure 5) and NOC from Tamil Nadu Fire & Rescue Services, Tirunelveli Circle (enclosed as Annexure 6). d. PROCESS DESCRIPTION
Indane Bottling Plant at SIPCOT Gangaikondan village will be operated by M/s IndianOil Corporation Ltd. The plant will function primarily as LPG receipt, storage & bottling unit for filling into cylinders. The plant operations are categorized as, 1. Receipt of product a. Transfer of LPG from M/s Indian Oil Petronas Pvt Ltd (M/s IPPL) through bullet trucks b. Truck unloading c. LPG transfer to storage bullets d. Storage of LPG in bullets
Page 11
PREFEASIBILITY REPORT
2. Receipt of empty LPG cylinders & segregation 3. a.Bottling e. Pumping of LPG to filling shed f. Bottling of LPG cylinders a. Quality check on filled cylinders
b.Loading into Trucks 4. Dispatch g. Loading of packed cylinders in trucks a. Supply & distribution to markets (through Authorized Vendors)
i. RECEIPT OF PRODUCT
LPG dosed with mercaptan will be received from M/s IPPL through bullet trucks. There are 8 nos of Tank Lorry Decantation Bays for the purpose of unloading bullet trucks and the product will be stored in mounded vessels(3 x 600MT storage capacity). ii. RECEIPT OF EMPTY LPG CYLINDERS & SEGREGATION
Empty LPG cylinders are received from vendor trucks & faulty cylinders are segregated at the point of receipt and diverted towards valve refitting section. iii. A.BOTTLING
LPG from storage bullets will bepumped to LPG Filling Shed (2 carousels having 24 filling machines each). Cylinder bottling will be the primary process carried out. After filling, each cylinder is subjected to quality check i.e. to check for leaks. iv. DISPATCH
Filled cylinders are loaded into respective Authorized Vendor trucks and dispatched. Cylinders that are damaged are stored separately and subsequently sold as scrap metal to Authorized Dealers.
Page 12
PREFEASIBILITY REPORT
e. PROCESS DESCRIPTION
Figure 3.2 Process flow chart
f. RAW MATERIAL REQUIREMENT & MATERIAL BALANCE
LPG is the only input & output for the entire bottling process. LPG is received from M/s IPPLthrough bullet trucks. The mass balance for the bottling capacity has been detailed below, Table 3.1 Mass balance for LPG bottling throughput
Flowrate Hours of operation LPG bottling Number of days Total (cum/hr) (day-1) (Tons /day) working (month-1) throughput (MTPA) 85 16 385 26 1,20,000
Page 13
PREFEASIBILITY REPORT
g. POWER REQUIREMENT & SOURCE
Power required for theoperations is 450kVA sourced from Tamil Nadu Electricity Board and D.G sets are used & their specifications are detailed below, Table 3.2 Details on D.G sets
S. No. Capacity Number Fuel used Stack height Stack diameter (m) (in) 1 750 1 HSD BS III 12 13.5 2 250 1 HSD BS III 6
h. MANPOWER REQUIREMENT
The total manpower requirement will be 75 persons which includes,
S. No. Grade Number 1. Officers 6 2. Workmen (Blue collar) 9 3. Contract labourers 40 4. Security 15 5. Electrical personnel 5 Total 75 75
i. WATER REQUIREMENT, SOURCE& WASTEWATER GENERATION
Total water requirement for the plant is 4KLD which is sourced through SIPCOT Industrial Growth Centre, Gangaikondan village. Permission letter is enclosed as Annexure4. Water balance table &diagram are given below Table 3.3 Water balance table
S. Domestic water Industrial water requirement Domestic sewage Wastewater from No. requirement (KLD) generation (KLD) process / cylinder (KLD) Cylinder washing washing (KLD)* 1 3 1 2.4 0.8 Total 4 3.2 * Note – Wastewater generated from cylinder washing will be primarily dirty water with suspended solids. After sedimentation, this water will be reused for cylinder washing. There will be no process / trade effluent generated during operations.
Page 14
PREFEASIBILITY REPORT
Figure 3.3 Water balance chart j. INDUSTRIAL WASTE GENERATION & DISPOSAL METHODS
No industrial solid waste will be generated during the bottling process. Damaged cylinders will besegregated & stored on site prior to disposal as scrap metal. Hazardous waste generated from D.G set operation will be disposed to TNPCB Authorized Recyclers.
D. INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS
The list of equipments present at the Indane Bottling Plant is Table 4.1 List of equipments / facilities & number
Sl no EQUIPMENT TOTAL NUMBER CAPACITY 1 LPG PUMPS 2 85 CUM/HR 2 LPG COMPRESSORS 2 3.85CUM/MIN 3 SCREW AIR COMPRESSORS 2 500 CUM/HR 4 MOUNDED BULLET 3x600 MT 1800MT 5 DG SET-1 1 750KVA 6 DG SET-2 1 250KVA 7 AUTOMATIC FILLING TYPE 2 24 POINT—1600- CARAOSAL 1800 CYL/HR 8 FIRE ENGINES 3 615CUM/HR 9 JOCKEY PUMPS 2 10CUM/HR
Page 15
PREFEASIBILITY REPORT
10 LOADING ARMS 8 - 11 AIR DRYER 1 540NM3/HR 12 EVACUATION COMPRESSOR 1 165NM3/HR 13 EVACUATION VESSEL 2 1CUM 14 VALVE CHANGING 2 - WITHOUT EVACUATION 15 AIR RECEIVER-1 1 1.5CUM 16 AIR RECEIVER-2 1 0.5CUM 17 SECURITY AIR 2 - COMPRESSOR
The land-use breakup of the project site is, Table 4.2 Land-use breakup
S. No. Land use parameter Area 1. Process building area 7000 sqm 2. Non-process building area 2.26 acres 3. Storage area 3250 sqm 4. Parking Area 6.7 acres 5. Driveway & pathway area 6000 sqm 6. Future expansion area 8 acres 7. Green belt development area 11.95 acres 8. Open area 16 acres 9. Total Area 42 acres
Page 16
PREFEASIBILITY REPORT
a. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL MEASURES
No emissions are generated during the operations as the entire bottling process is carried out through pipelines from Storage Area to Filling Shed. The only point sources of emissions are D.G sets & Fire Engines. They have been fitted with stacks of adequate height to disperse the pollutants. Table 4.3 Details on APCs
S. Source of emission Control Material of Top Height No. measure construction diameter above (m) GL (m) 1 750kVA D.G set &250kVA D.G set Stack MS Pipe 12” & 6” 13.5 2 Fire engines (3 nos.) Stack MS Pipe 6” 11
b. WASTEWATER TREATMENT METHOD
Sewage is disposed through septic tanks & soak pits (1 nos.) of dimensions 2m x 1.5m x 1.5m. Washing water generated from cylinder washing will be diverted to sedimentation trapsfitted with oil separator &clarified water will be reused for cylinder washing. The dimension of the sump is 2m x 1.5m x 1.5m.
c. FIRE FIGHTING & DISASTER MANAGEMENT MEASURES
M/s IOCL is classified as “Major Accident Hazard (MAH)” Installation under Manufacture, Storage & Import of Hazardous Chemicals (MSIHC) Rules 1989, 2000. Accordingly they have formulated & implemented On-site & Off-site Emergency Plans. The safety aspects taken into account during pipeline design are,
• Pipelines have been designed in accordance with the requirements of ASME B3.14 and OISD 141.
• Cathodic protection is provided for the pipelines to prevent external corrosion.
• Thickness of the pipeline as provided presently (6.4mm) is more than the calculated thickness (as per design). The calculated thickness is 2.17mm (inclusive of corrosion allowance) for the LPG pipelines.
Page 17
PREFEASIBILITY REPORT
• The pipelines are being provided with enhanced external corrosion 3LPE coating compared to the standard requirements of DIN 30670, which would significantly improve the in-filed performance of the coating. M/s IOCL have also conducted a Risk Assessment study. Findings & recommendations of the RA study have been summarized as follows,
• In mounded bullets, catastrophic failure will not take place. They are non-credible scenarios with a very low frequency of occurrence i.e. 1/106 years.
• Hazard distance due to road tanker catastrophic failure and unloading arm failure will not go beyond the plant boundary.
• The individual risk level of 1 x 10-6 /yr is limited to a distance of about 200m on either side of the pipeline corridor.
• Small holes when undetected may lead to large holes in the pipeline system. Large holes are associated with a very low frequency of occurrence and can be considered as rare. The results of such a failure are to be used for developing a meaningful emergency plan. The large hole scenario case (wherein the hazard distances are larger when compared to small holes) can be averted if the leak is determined in the initial stage itself when the leak size is small and the pipeline is isolated immediately on detection of the leak.
• It is advised to have a leak detection system to detect leaks in the pipeline due to small holes. Operator on detection of leak could then isolate this line by closing the valves remotely.
• Majority of pipeline incidents are caused by external interference. This external interference could be due to excavation, drilling etc. Frequent patrolling / full walking surveys of pipeline along the pipeline route will enable to detect, as early as possible, such activities near the pipeline.
• Emergency Response Plan / Disaster Management Plan which would be prepared for the system shall address the action plans to be taken in event of releases from LPG pipelines. The Hydrant Layout showing location of Fire Hydrants & Water Lines is shown in the following figure.
Page 18
PREFEASIBILITY REPORT
Figure 4.1 Fire Hydrant Layout
Page 19
PREFEASIBILITY REPORT
d. DESCRIPTION OF MOUNDED BULLETS
The mounded storage of LPG has proved to be safer compared to above ground storage vessels since it provides intrinsically passive and safe environment and eliminates the possibility of Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapour Explosion (BLEVE). The cover of the mound protects the vessel from fire engulfment, radiation from a fire in close proximity and acts of sabotage or vandalism. The area of land required to locate a mounded system is minimal compared to conventional storage. Excavation up to a depth of 0.75 M was done for construction of mounded bullet foundation (Below FGL). Cathodic protection through sacrificial anode method has been provided for all the three bullets for their protection.
i. SAFETY ASPECTS FOR SETTING UP MOUNDED BULLETS
• Mounded tanks are semi-conventional pressure vessels, covered by a layer of soil or sand. By mounding LPG tanks with an adequate layer of sand and earth, the possibility of fire engulfment and a BLEVE is removed.
• Mounded vessel(s) placed on a firm foundation will not suffer from flotation. Thus mounded tanks have the advantage over underground LPG tanks, which require protection against possible floatation.
• Mounding allows safety distances around the facility to be considerably reduced, compared to an equivalent unprotected design.
• The extra cost associated with a mounded system is offset by the lower cost of the land required, and the virtual exclusion of fire fighting systems.
• Mounded systems have also been installed where the available space, or environmental pressure, precluded traditional storage methods. ii. ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS
• Large volume of water required for the fire systems of conventional storage are eliminated thus reducing the demand on valuable water sources, and problems associated with the drainage and disposal of the water.
• Mounded LPG gas tanks can be landscaped to blend with the environment.
Page 20
PREFEASIBILITY REPORT
e. RAINWATER HARVESTING MEASURES
Storm water drains have been developed to collect run-off water from paved areas. Three recharge pits (2 on-site & 1 truck parking area) have been set up at the site to harvest run-off water. The storm water layout is shown in the following figure.
Page 21
PREFEASIBILITY REPORT
Figure 4.2Storm water layout
Page 22 PREFEASIBILITY REPORT
E. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
M/s IOCL will constructsanitary facilities in nearby Girls Government School as per directive from Ministry. Estimated cost will be Rs 42 lakhs.
Time frame (year) Activity
Construction of Toilet Facility for Government Girls High School, 2015-16 Gangaikondan village at a cost of Rs 7.5 lakhs School students sitting benches and desks for Gangaikondan village at 2015-16 a cost of Rs. 7.0 Lakhs Construction of bore well and pipeline facility Chirancherry village at 2016-17 cost of Rs. 9.5 Lakhs 2016-17. Provision of RO plant at Uraiyur village at a cost of Rs 9.5 Lakh Renovation of Toilet Facility for Government High School, 2017-18 Chirancherry village at a cost of Rs 8.0 lakhs
Total 42 Lakhs (0.5% of project cost)
F. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
Sl Environmental management plan Capital costs in Recurring costs in no Rs Rs ( Annual ) 1 Gardening / Horticulture 5 Lac 2 Lac 2 Rain water Harvesting 3 Lac 0.2 Lac 3 Septic tank / soak pits 3.4 Lac 0.3 Lac 4 Gas monitoring system 46 Lac 1.0 Lac 5 Vapour extraction unit 11.5 Lac 0.3 Lac 6 Monitoring of air and noise - 0.5 Lac pollution 7 Water water management – cylinder 1.5 Lac 0.2 Lac washing unit and In line bath Total 70.4 Lac 4.5 Lac
G. PROJECT COST & IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
Cost for setting up the Indane Bottling Plant at SIPCOT, Gangaikondan village is estimated at 78.58 crores. Upon obtaining Environmental Clearance, M/s IOCL will commence LPG bottling at the Indane Bottling Plant.
Page 23