Monolithically Integrated Boost Converter Based on 0.5- M CMOS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Monolithically Integrated Boost Converter Based on 0.5- M CMOS 628 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, VOL. 20, NO. 3, MAY 2005 Monolithically Integrated Boost Converter Based on 0.5-"m CMOS Process Haifei Deng, Student Member, IEEE, Xiaoming Duan, Nick Sun, Yan Ma, Alex Q. Huang, Senior Member, IEEE, and Dan Chen, Fellow, IEEE Abstract—Today and in the future, a huge market arises for mo- in monolithic integration. In order to reduce cost, logic CMOS bile power [1]. Efficient performance, functionality, small profile technology is considered to be a good option for portable ICs and low cost are the most desired features for mobile power man- due to its low cost and the good electrical performance of the agement integrated circuits. Compared with the discrete-switching dc–dc converter, monolithic integration offers many benefits and sub-micron NMOS and PMOS [4]–[6]. In particular, sub-mi- new design challenges. In this paper, a monolithically integrated cron MOSFETs outperforms the vertical power MOSFET in high-efficiency boost dc–dc converter for nickel metal hydride or terms of switching speed; this makes the CMOS-based mono- alkaline battery-powered applications is designed based on the lithic converter suitable for high-frequency applications. Since low-voltage CMOS process. Several novel concepts are proposed the battery source for portable power can be a single 1.2-V for compensator design, low-voltage startup, light-load efficiency and power device optimization. nickel metal hydride with a final discharge voltage of 0.8 V to several 4.3-V LiIon batteries in series [1], both low-voltage Index Terms—CMOS, dc–dc converter, monolithic. and high-voltage operation may be required for portable power ICs. At the low-voltage end, low-voltage analog IC design is I. INTRODUCTION a challenge in terms of safely starting up the boost converter chip. At the high-voltage end, higher-voltage CMOS or CMOS ORTABLE power is increasingly becoming the most variants are needed for high-input-voltage applications. P important application area for power semiconductor in- tegrated circuits (ICs). Small form factor, high efficiency and II. STRUCTURE OF THE MONOLITHIC BOOST CONVERTER low cost are the most desired features for portable power ICs. In order to reduce the form factor, monolithic integration is In this paper, a monolithic low-voltage high-efficiency boost preferred, which means that everything from the compensator, dc–dc converter for Ni-Metal hydride or alkaline battery- pow- external ramp, driver and power switches will be integrated ered application is designed based on the low-voltage 0.5- onto a single chip. With current technology, the energy storage m CMOS process. Fig. 1 shows the simplified block diagram elements like inductor and output capacitor have to be placed for the converter chip. Table I lists the key operation speci- off silicon because of the low value of inductor and high cost fications for this converter. Peak-current control pulse width to build large size on-silicon capacitor. Future development will modulation (PWM) and pulse frequency modulation (PFM) are even make it possible to integrate the energy storage elements, used for heavy-load and light-load operations respectively. A such as the inductor and capacitor. This development relies start-up controller is used for low-voltage start-up. 0.5- mlow- on further technology development in the area of high-density voltage NMOSFET is used as the boost switch and a sub-mi- inductor and capacitor design that is compatible with semi- cron PMOSFET is used as a synchronous rectifier to further im- conductor technology, as well as the techniques to operate the prove efficiency. An external Schottky diode is paralleled with converter at extremely high frequencies [2], [3]. Since the right the PMOSFET to prevent the body diode from conduction and half-plane zero and resonant poles of the boost converter move to conduct the inductor current during the dead-time period. The according to input voltage, output voltage and load current, controller power is supplied by the output voltage. The min- how to design a fixed compensator built inside the chip for a imum start-up voltage is 1.1 V, which is limited by the threshold wide operation range is a big challenge. Since the power device voltage of the PMOSFET and NMOSFET. After start-up, the and driver are integrated with the control circuit, noise can be converter can operate with an input voltage as low as 0.7 V, easily injected from the power stage to the analog control part. which is determined by the maximum duty cycle of the con- Noise separation between these areas is therefore a major issue verter. Manuscript received April 7, 2004; revised November 9, 2004. Recom- III. CHIP DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS mended by Associate Editor J. A. Ferreira. H. Deng, N. Sun, and Y. Ma are with the Center for Power Electronics A. Stability Modeling and Adaptive Compensation Design for Systems, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia a Wide Application Range Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24060-0179 USA (e-mail: [email protected]). Fig. 2 shows the simplified diagram for peak-current PWM X. Duan and A. Q. Huang are with the Semiconductor Power Electronics control. Since the right half-plane zero and resonant poles of the Center, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North Carolina power stage for boost move according to duty cycle State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7571 USA. D. Chen is with National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. and load current, it is quite difficult to design a fixed Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TPEL.2005.846551 on-chip compensator to stabilize the converter system for a wide 0885-8993/$20.00 © 2005 IEEE DENG et al.: MONOLITHICALLY INTEGRATED BOOST CONVERTER 629 Fig. 1. Functional block diagram of the developed monolithic boost converter chip. TABLE I KEY PARAMETERS FOR THE CHIP Fig. 2. Simplified block diagram of peak current control PWM controller. operation range. For monolithic integration, since the compen- sator, ramp compensation and current sensor are fixed inside the Fig. 3. q with different load and input voltage (a) q without constant silicon; the loop-gain design for the monolithic boost converter ripple assumptions and (b) q with constant ripple assumptions. becomes very challenging. According to Ridley [7], when the current loop is closed, the this purpose, we proposed the following two constant-ripple de- power stage is degraded to a one-order system. The compensa- sign approaches: Constant inductor current ripple assumption tion is designed based on the transfer function from to as shown in Fig. 2. Fig. 3 shows the bode plot of . There are a dominant pole , a right half-plane zero and a double-pole at the half switching frequency in . For different applications, the dominant pole and right half-plane zero (1) move with duty cycle and the load current, as shown in Fig. 3(a). In order to make the system stable for all cases, it Constant output voltage ripple assumption is desirable to keep and constant for different ap- plications (different and load current) so that a fixed compensator can be used to compensate the whole system. For (2) 630 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, VOL. 20, NO. 3, MAY 2005 In this design approach, and should be selected as constants by choosing correct values for and in different applications. Based on (1) and (2), the and can be simplified as (3) (4) Now, is close to a constant and will only change with load current. Fig. 3(b) shows under these two assump- tions. Compared with the in Fig. 3(a), the in Fig. 3(b) allows for much easier compensation by a two-pole-one-zero network. Fig. 3(b) shows that when the load current increases, the dc gain of will drop down and will move to a lower frequency. If the second pole of the compensator is much higher than due to the rise of load current, the final system loop gain may rise above unity gain and cause the system to be unstable. In order to achieve high bandwidth and stability for different series of duty cycle and different load current; an adaptive compensation concept is proposed. In the adaptive compensation, when the load current increases, the dc gain of the compensator will increase; meanwhile, the second pole will move to lower frequency to damp the of so that the gain of will not rise above 0 dB and cause stability problems. Fig. 4(a) shows the adaptive compensation concept, and Fig. 4(b) shows the system loop gain at different conditions. The bandwidth of the system loop gain is close to a constant 10 kHz for different application conditions. The stability is obviously improved by constant ripple assumptions and adaptive compensation. Fig. 4(a) shows that the compensator requires a zero at around 1 kHz and one pole at around 30 kHz; Fig. 5(a) shows the widely used op-amp-based two-pole-one-zero compensator network. According to the equations in the right hand part of Fig. 5(a), the needed passive components are 17.5 k 10 k , 16.7 K , 500 k , 308 pF and 18.2 pF. However, it is typically very difficult to implement large-value resistors and capacitors on silicon. The capacitors needed for this op-amp-based compensator are too large to be integrated. In order to reduce the area needed for the compensator, a novel Fig. 4. Adaptive compensation concept and system loop gain with constant compensator structure called active feedback compensator is ripple assumption and adaptive compensation (a) adaptive compensation and proposed for this chip. The basic idea of this compensator is (b) system loop gain.
Recommended publications
  • A Buck-Boost Transformerless DC–DC Converter Based on IGBT Modules for Fast Charge of Electric Vehicles
    electronics Article A Buck-Boost Transformerless DC–DC Converter Based on IGBT Modules for Fast Charge of Electric Vehicles Borislav Dimitrov 1,* , Khaled Hayatleh 1, Steve Barker 1, Gordana Collier 1, Suleiman Sharkh 2 and Andrew Cruden 2 1 School of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics, Oxford Brookes University, Wheatley campus, Oxford OX33 1HX, UK; [email protected] (K.H.); [email protected] (S.B.); [email protected] (G.C.) 2 Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK; [email protected] (S.S.); [email protected] (A.C.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-(0)1865-482962 Received: 9 January 2020; Accepted: 25 February 2020; Published: 28 February 2020 Abstract: A transformer-less Buck-Boost direct current–direct current (DC–DC) converter in use for the fast charge of electric vehicles, based on powerful high-voltage isolated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) modules is analyzed, designed and experimentally verified. The main advantages of this topology are: simple structure on the converter’s power stage; a wide range of the output voltage, capable of supporting contemporary vehicles’ on-board battery packs; efficiency; and power density accepted to be high enough for such a class of hard-switched converters. A precise estimation of the loss, dissipated in the converter’s basic modes of operation Buck, Boost, and Buck-Boost is presented. The analysis shows an approach of loss minimization, based on switching frequency reduction during the Buck-Boost operation mode. Such a technique guarantees stable thermal characteristics during the entire operation, i.e., battery charge cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Single Stage Ac-Dc Step up Converter Using Boost and Buck- Boost Converters
    ISSN (Print) : 2320 – 3765 ISSN (Online): 2278 – 8875 International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering (An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization) Vol. 2, Issue 9, September 2013 SINGLE STAGE AC-DC STEP UP CONVERTER USING BOOST AND BUCK- BOOST CONVERTERS Kumar K1, S.V. Sivanagaraju2, Rajasekharachari k3 PG Student, Department Of EEE, Sri Venkateswara College Of Engg.& Technology, Chittoor, A.P, India1 Associate Professor , Department Of EEE, Sri Venkateswara College Of Engg.& Technology , Chittoor, A.P, India2 PG Student, Department Of EEE, Sri Venkateswara College Of Engg.& Technology, Chittoor, A.P, India3 ABSTRACT: This paper presents a single stage AC-DC step up power converter that avoids the bridge rectification and directly converts the low AC input voltage to the required high DC Output voltage at a higher efficiency. In order to convert AC-DC we need a bridge rectifier and boost converter for step up the DC output voltage to meet the load demand. This two- stage conversion process increases the converter cost and reduces the efficiency of converter due to presence of more no. of semi conductor devices. The proposed converter consists of a boost converter in parallel with a buck–boost converter. Boost converter operated in the positive half cycle and buck-boost converter in the negative half cycle. As a result we obtain a high DC output voltage from a low AC input voltage in single stage conversion. The proposed converter has been designed by using MATLAB. Keywords: AC-DC converter, boost converter, buck-boost converter. I. INTRODUCTION Power electronics may be defined as the subject of applications of solid state power semiconductor devices (Thyristors) for the control and conversion of electric power.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Select a Proper Inductor for Low Power Boost Converter
    Application Report SLVA797–June 2016 How to Select a Proper Inductor for Low Power Boost Converter Jasper Li ............................................................................................. Boost Converter Solution / ALPS 1 Introduction Traditionally, the inductor value of a boost converter is selected through the inductor current ripple. The average input current IL(DC_MAX) of the inductor is calculated using Equation 1. Then the inductance can be [1-2] calculated using Equation 2. It is suggested that the ∆IL(P-P) should be 20%~40% of IL(DC_MAX) . V x I = OUT OUT(MAX) IL(DC_MAX) VIN(TYP) x η (1) Where: • VOUT: output voltage of the boost converter. • IOUT(MAX): the maximum output current. • VIN(TYP): typical input voltage. • ƞ: the efficiency of the boost converter. V x() V+ V - V L = IN OUT D IN ΔIL(PP)- xf SW x() V OUT+ V D (2) Where: • ƒSW: the switching frequency of the boost converter. • VD: Forward voltage of the rectify diode or the synchronous MOSFET in on-state. However, the suggestion of the 20%~40% current ripple ratio does not take in account the package size of inductor. At the small output current condition, following the suggestion may result in large inductor that is not applicable in a real circuit. Actually, the suggestion is only the start-point or reference for an inductor selection. It is not the only factor, or even not an important factor to determine the inductance in the low power application of a boost converter. Taking TPS61046 as an example, this application note proposes a process to select an inductor in the low power application.
    [Show full text]
  • Ultra-Efficient Cascaded Buck-Boost Converter
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2017 Ultra-Efficient Cascaded Buck-Boost Converter Anirudh Ashok Pise University of Central Florida Part of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Ashok Pise, Anirudh, "Ultra-Efficient Cascaded Buck-Boost Converter" (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 6064. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/6064 ULTRA-EFFICIENT CASCADED BUCK-BOOST CONVERTER by ANIRUDH ASHOK PISE B.E. Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology, 2013 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering in the College of Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Fall Term 2017 Major Professor: Issa Batarseh © 2017 ANIRUDH ASHOK PISE ii ABSTRACT This thesis presents various techniques to achieve ultra-high-efficiency for Cascaded- Buck-Boost converter. A rigorous loss model with component nonlinearities is developed and validated experimentally. An adaptive-switching-frequency control is discussed to optimize weighted efficiency. Some soft-switching techniques are discussed. A low-profile planar-nanocrystalline inductor is developed and various design aspects of core and copper design are discussed. Finite-element-method is used to examine and visualize the inductor design.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing Boost Converter TPS61372 in Low Power Application Report
    Application Report SLVAE31–October 2018 Designing Boost Converter TPS61372 in Low Power Application Jasper Li ABSTRACT The application report introduces how to design a small power, small solution size boost converter using the TPS61372 device. The external components of the converter are calculated and selected based on the designed target. The stable and transient performances are measured at different conditions to show the behavior of the converter. Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 2 2 External Component Design ............................................................................................... 2 3 Bench Test Result ........................................................................................................... 3 4 Summary...................................................................................................................... 5 5 References ................................................................................................................... 5 List of Figures 1 Operating Mode at Different Load Conditions ........................................................................... 2 2 Output Voltage Ripple at No Load Condition ............................................................................ 3 3 Output Voltage Ripple at 50-mA Load condition ........................................................................ 3 4 Output Ripple at 5-V Output and no load condition ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • LECTURE 9 A. Buck-Boost Converter Design 1. Volt-Sec Balance: F(D)
    LECTURE 9 A. Buck-Boost Converter Design 1. Volt-Sec Balance: f(D), steady- state transfer function 2. DC Operating Point via Charge Balance: I(D) in steady-state 3. Ripple Voltage / “C” Spec 4. Ripple Current / “L” Spec 5. Peak Switch Currents and Blocking Voltages / Worst Case Transistor Specs B. Practical Issues for L and C Components 1. Inductor:L = f(I)? L= f(fsw)? a. Cost of Cores b. Inductor Core Materials Unique to Each fsw Choice c. Core Saturation above i(crit) B > Bsat, L = f(i) B < Bsat, L ¹ f(i) 2. Capacitor: C(fsw, ic, vc) a. Costs b. Dielectric Materials (1) e(fsw) (2) E(breakdown) C. Appendix 2 A. Buck-boost Converter Design 1.Volt-Sec Balance: f(D), steady-state transfer function We can implement the double pole double throw switch by one actively controlled transistor and one passive diode controlled by the circuit currents so that when Q1 is on D1 is off and when Q1 is off D1 is on. General form Q1-D1 Switch Implementation Q1 D1 1 2 + + Vg v v C R Vg C R i(t) i(t) L - - Two switch cases occur, resulting in two separate circuit topologies. Case 1: SW 1 on, SW 2 off; Transistor Q1 is on Knowing Vout is negative means diode D1 is off and load is not connected to input. This is a unique circuit topology as given below. Only Q1 is active turned on/off by control signals. Input Circuit Topology: Q1 is on; Von small (2V) compared to Vg.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring and Understanding the Output Voltage Ripple of a Boost Converter
    www.ti.com Table of Contents Application Report Measuring and Understanding the Output Voltage Ripple of a Boost Converter Jasper Li ABSTRACT The output ripple waveform of a boost converter is normally larger than the calculation result because of the voltage spike. Such behavior is related to the measurement method, the operating principle and the non-ideal characteristics of the boost circuit. The application note analyzes the root cause of the spike in the output ripple and proposes a simple solutions to solve the problem. Table of Contents 1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................................................................2 2 Observation in Bench Test.....................................................................................................................................................3 3 Root Cause Analysis.............................................................................................................................................................. 5 4 A Simple Solution................................................................................................................................................................... 8 5 Summary............................................................................................................................................................................... 10 List of Figures Figure 1-1. Simplified Schematic of TPS61022..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DC/DC Converter Output Capacitor Benchmark
    DC/DC Converter Output Capacitor Benchmark R. Šponar, R. Faltus, M. Jáně, Z. Flegr, T. Zedníček AVX Czech Republic s.r.o., Dvorakova 328, 563 01 Lanskroun, Czech Republic email: [email protected] Abstract Switched-mode power supplies (SMPS) are commonly found in many electronic systems. Important SMPS requirements are a stable output voltage with load current, good temperature stability, low ripple voltage and high overall efficiency. If the electronic system in question is to be portable, small size and light weight are also important considerations. A key component in switching power systems is the output capacitor – used to store the charge and for smoothing - therefore its careful selection plays a vital role in determining the overall parameters of the power supply. Different capacitor technologies – tantalum, ceramic MLCC, niobium oxide (NbO) and aluminium - are suitable to meet different electrical requirements. This paper presents the results of an output capacitor benchmark study used in a step-down DC/DC converter design, based on a well-used control IC (Maxim’s MAX 1537 – Ref.1) with a 6-24V input voltage range and two separate voltage outputs of 3.3 and 5V. The behaviour of different output capacitor technologies was evaluated by measuring the output ripple voltage. Defined fixed load and fixed switching frequency settings were used for all measurements. Introduction The selection of a suitable output capacitor plays an important part in the design of switching voltage converters. “Some 99 percent of so-called ‘design’ problems associated with linear and switching regulators can be traced directly to the improper use of capacitors”, states the National Semiconductor IC Power Handbook (Ref.2).
    [Show full text]
  • A New Three-Level Flying-Capacitor Boost Converter with an Integrated LC2D Output Network for Fuel-Cell Vehicles: Analysis and Design
    Article A New Three-Level Flying-Capacitor Boost Converter with an Integrated LC2D Output Network for Fuel-Cell Vehicles: Analysis and Design Nour Elsayad *, Hadi Moradisizkoohi and Osama Mohammed Energy Systems Research Laboratory, Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33174, USA; [email protected] (H.M.); [email protected] (O.M.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-786-328-8450 Received: 21 July 2018; Accepted: 22 August 2018; Published: 28 August 2018 Abstract: In this paper, a new three-level boost converter with continuous input current, common ground, reduced voltage stress on the power switches, and wide voltage gain range is proposed. The proposed converter is composed of a three-level flying-capacitor switching cell and an integrated LC2D output network. The LC2D output network enhances the voltage gain of the converter and reduces the voltage stress on the power switches. The proposed converter is a good candidate to interface fuel cells to the dc-link bus of the three-phase inverter of an electric vehicle (EV). A full steady-state analysis of the proposed converter in the continuous conduction mode (CCM) is given in this paper. A 1.2 kW scaled-down laboratory setup was built using gallium nitride (GaN) transistors and silicon carbide (SiC) diodes to verify the feasibility of the proposed converter. Keywords: boost converter; multilevel; wide-bandgap; GaN; SiC; canonical switching cell; flying capacitor; renewable energy; fuel cells; electric vehicles 1. Introduction There is a growing global interest in reducing greenhouse gases by developing new clean energy technologies that address the challenges associated with the increasing penetration of renewable energy systems and the need to reduce fossil fuel consumption.
    [Show full text]
  • Design of the Boost Converter
    © 2017 solidThinking, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved. An Altair Company BOOST CONVERTER • ACTIVATE solidThinking © 2017 solidThinking, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved. An Altair Company Description of Boost Converter In a boost converter, the output voltage is greater than the input voltage, hence the name “boost”. The function of boost converter can be divided into two modes, Mode 1 and Mode 2. Mode 1 begins when Switch “ S ” is ON at time t=0. The input current rises and flows through inductor L and Switch. Mode 2 begins when Switch “ S ” is OFF at time t = t1. The input current now flows through L, C, load, and diode . The inductor current falls until the next cycle. The energy stored in inductor L flows through the load. By the proper design of the inductor and the capacitor values and the duty cycle of the triggering pulse with the suitable switching frequency, gives the output from the converter. • ACTIVATE solidThinking © 2017 solidThinking, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved. An Altair Company Circuit Topology • ACTIVATE solidThinking © 2017 solidThinking, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved. An Altair Company Inductor & Capacitor Parameters With the Given parameters in the system obtaining the nearest practical calculated values and Simulating the file. The Voltage and the current waveforms of the simulated Boost converter are given below. • ACTIVATE solidThinking © 2017 solidThinking, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved. An Altair Company Voltage Waveform V o l t a g e Time • ACTIVATE solidThinking © 2017 solidThinking, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved. An Altair Company Current Waveform C u r r e n t Time • ACTIVATE solidThinking © 2017 solidThinking, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • (Boost) Converter Covered in Chapter 7 of Mohan, Undeland and Robbins
    DC/DC Converters: The Step up (Boost) Converter Covered in Chapter 7 of Mohan, Undeland and Robbins Topics xCircuit and Basic Operation xContinuous Mode Analysis o Voltage Transfer Ratio o Inductor Ripple Current o Input Current o Output Current and Voltage Ripple o Capacitor Ripple Current xDiscontinuous Mode Analysis o Boundary Condition o Duty cycle as a function of current (Constant Vo) Circuit Continuous Mode Boost Converter Waveforms D.Ts (1-D).Ts Switch On Off T s time vL Vd Vo time Vd-Vo iL 'IL IL time IDiode 'IL Average = Io time Continuous Mode Boost Converter Relationships (You must be able to derive) V Voltage Transfer Ratio: V d o (1 D) V .D.T Inductor Peak to Peak Ripple Current: ' I d s L L I Input Current I I o d L (1 D) ' I I Diode Current: Peak to Peak Ripple = I L | I | o L 2 L (1 D) I .esr Peak to Peak Output Voltage Ripple (approximation) = o (1 D) Ripple Current Rating of the Output Capacitor Electrolytic capacitors have a maximum ripple current rating and the output capacitor of the boost converter is exposed to high ripple. The easiest way to determine the required ripple rating of the output capacitor is to use the following relationships, which hold for any waveform: T s I 2 (t).dt ³0 I rms Ts T s I (t).dt ³0 I dc Ts 2 2 2 2 I rms I dc I ac I dc I rms I ac Use the general formula for rms to calculate the rms of the diode current waveform and assume that the ac component of this goes into the capacitor while the dc component flows into the load.
    [Show full text]
  • Sliding Mode Output Regulation for a Boost Power Converter †
    energies Article Sliding Mode Output Regulation for a Boost Power Converter † Jorge Rivera 1,∗ , Susana Ortega-Cisneros 2 and Florentino Chavira 3 1 CONACYT–Advanced Studies and Research Center (CINVESTAV), National Polytechnic Institute (IPN), Guadalajara Campus, Zapopan 45015, Mexico 2 Advanced Studies and Research Center (CINVESTAV), National Polytechnic Institute (IPN), Guadalajara Campus, Zapopan 45015, Mexico; [email protected] 3 Ceti Unidad Colomos, Calle Nueva Escocia 1885, Providencia 5a Sección, Guadalajara 44638, Mexico; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +52-33-3777-3600 † This paper is an extended version of our paper published in CCE 2012, Mexico city, Mexico, 26–28 September 2012. Received: 21 November 2018; Accepted: 21 February 2019; Published: 6 March 2019 Abstract: This work deals with the novel application of the sliding mode (discontinuous) output regulation theory to a nonlinear electrical circuit, the so-called boost power converter. This theory has excelled due to the fact that trajectory tracking plays a central role. The control of a boost power converter for the output tracking of a DC biased sinusoidal signal is a challenging problem for control engineers. The main difficulties are the computation of a proper reference signal for the inductor current, and the stabilization of the inductor current dynamics or to guarantee the correct output tracking of the capacitor voltage. With the application of the discontinuous output regulation these problems are solved in this work. Simulations and real time experiments were carried out with an unknown variation of the DC input voltage, where the good output tracking of the capacitor voltage was verified along with the stabilization of the inductor current.
    [Show full text]